Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2
On 12/10/16 8:35 AM, Valentin Gosu wrote: I had some patches posted in bug 1263722, but then I started working on other things, and I haven't been watching the spec in the mean time. I'll try to get the patches ready to land later next week, and I'll try to see if there are any relevant changes the spec has made that affect our implementation. Great, thank you. The high priority here is really to check whether the spec makes sense, both in terms of whether the timings it exposes are the right/useful ones and in terms of whether it can actually be implemented sanely. If you can do that, that would be very much appreciated. -Boris ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2
I had some patches posted in bug 1263722, but then I started working on other things, and I haven't been watching the spec in the mean time. I'll try to get the patches ready to land later next week, and I'll try to see if there are any relevant changes the spec has made that affect our implementation. On 9 December 2016 at 23:06, Boris Zbarsky wrote: > On 12/9/16 6:22 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > >> Performance Timeline Level 2 >> W3C TR draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline-2/ >> W3C Editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/ >> deadline: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 >> > > Has anyone on our end been tracking this work or implementing this? In > general, this is one of the specs we would be expected to implement, so we > should make sure _someone_ looks at it > > -Boris > ___ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Intent to ship: Presentation API on Fennec
On 12/5/16 3:20 AM, Mounir Lamouri wrote: Correct. Intent to ship has been sent on blink-dev. Chrome Android should follow. Do you have any idea what the timeframe is? The answers to these two questions is very similar. The spec allows to pass an array of URLs to the `PresentationRequest` constructor. That will allow developers to pass Chrome Cast, DIAL and HTTP links (usually called 1-UA mode). Potentially also a Firefox OS TV app URL if they are still different from regular HTTP links. OK, but a website doing this won't work in Chrome Android. So what would websites actually do in practice? -Boris ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: W3C Candidate Recommendation: Performance Timeline Level 2
On 12/9/16 6:22 PM, L. David Baron wrote: Performance Timeline Level 2 W3C TR draft: https://www.w3.org/TR/performance-timeline-2/ W3C Editor's draft: https://w3c.github.io/performance-timeline/ deadline: Tuesday, February 28, 2017 Has anyone on our end been tracking this work or implementing this? In general, this is one of the specs we would be expected to implement, so we should make sure _someone_ looks at it -Boris ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
