Re: Intent to implement and ship: Overflow media queries
On 12/23/18 2:59 AM, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: Summary: More explicitly expose the kind of handling for overflowing content in media queries. Using a media expression instead of the print media type allows for more flexibility, see the bug description. Implementation wise, we already expose the same kind of information via @media print right now, given we don't have any kind of built-in EBook mode or something like that. A volunteer sent patches for this, and I see no reason not to take them, unless somebody objects here. Thanks a lot quasicomputational@! :) Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1422235 Link to standard: https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries-4/#mf-overflow-inline https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries-4/#mf-overflow-block Platform coverage: all Estimated or target release: 66 Preference behind which this will be implemented: None Is this feature enabled by default in sandboxed iframes: Yes DevTools bug: N/A, existing devtools features should cover this. Do other browser engines implement this? No, we'd be the first ones implementing this part of the spec, but I think it's uncontroversial. The spec author was the one that filed the bug requesting implementation, so spec-wise the feature should be stable as well. General CSSWG policy is that any spec in CR has the consensus of the CSSWG to be implemented and shipped. “Once a specification reaches the Candidate Recommendation stage, implementers should release an unprefixed implementation of any CR-level feature they can demonstrate to be correctly implemented according to spec, and should avoid exposing a prefixed variant of that feature.” -- https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS/#testing Media Queries Level 4 is in CR, so anything there is good to go. ~fantasai ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Intent to implement and ship: Overflow media queries
On 1/2/19 5:18 PM, James Graham wrote: On 23/12/2018 10:59, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: web-platform-tests: Minimal parsing tests are being added to: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries/test_media_queries.html Unfortunately WPT has no way to test print preview or pagination right now so the rest of reftests are Gecko-only. Mind filing an issue on the wpt repo about the inability to test these features? It seems like something we could at least investigate, although I don't think there's currently any cross-browser API (including via e.g. WebDriver) for getting paginated layout. I think this is covered already by: https://github.com/web-platform-tests/wpt/issues/7760 We have reftest-paged for this and also a programatic (yet not ideal) way to test print preview: https://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/rev/0ee0b63732d35d16ba22d5a1120622e2e8d58c29/layout/base/tests/chrome/printpreview_helper.xul#26 -- Emilio ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Re: Intent to implement and ship: Overflow media queries
On 23/12/2018 10:59, Emilio Cobos Álvarez wrote: web-platform-tests: Minimal parsing tests are being added to: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries/test_media_queries.html Unfortunately WPT has no way to test print preview or pagination right now so the rest of reftests are Gecko-only. Mind filing an issue on the wpt repo about the inability to test these features? It seems like something we could at least investigate, although I don't think there's currently any cross-browser API (including via e.g. WebDriver) for getting paginated layout. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Intent to implement and ship: Overflow media queries
Summary: More explicitly expose the kind of handling for overflowing content in media queries. Using a media expression instead of the print media type allows for more flexibility, see the bug description. Implementation wise, we already expose the same kind of information via @media print right now, given we don't have any kind of built-in EBook mode or something like that. A volunteer sent patches for this, and I see no reason not to take them, unless somebody objects here. Thanks a lot quasicomputational@! :) Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1422235 Link to standard: https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries-4/#mf-overflow-inline https://drafts.csswg.org/mediaqueries-4/#mf-overflow-block Platform coverage: all Estimated or target release: 66 Preference behind which this will be implemented: None Is this feature enabled by default in sandboxed iframes: Yes DevTools bug: N/A, existing devtools features should cover this. Do other browser engines implement this? No, we'd be the first ones implementing this part of the spec, but I think it's uncontroversial. The spec author was the one that filed the bug requesting implementation, so spec-wise the feature should be stable as well. web-platform-tests: Minimal parsing tests are being added to: https://wpt.fyi/results/css/mediaqueries/test_media_queries.html Unfortunately WPT has no way to test print preview or pagination right now so the rest of reftests are Gecko-only. Is this feature restricted to secure contexts? No, same as all other media expressions. ___ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
