W3C Proposed Recommendation: Web Storage

2013-04-22 Thread L. David Baron
The Web Apps Working Group at W3C has published a Proposed
Recommendation, Web Storage (the stage before W3C's final stage,
Recommendation):
  http://www.w3.org/TR/2013/PR-webstorage-20130409/

There's a call for review to W3C member companies (of which Mozilla
is one) open until Tuesday, May 7.

If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the
review, or if you think Mozilla should voice support or opposition
to the specification, please say so in this thread.  (I'd note,
however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make
comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla   http://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


W3C Proposed Recommendation: Web Storage (Second Edition)

2016-01-06 Thread L. David Baron
A W3C Proposed Recommendation is available for the membership of W3C
(including Mozilla) to vote on, before they proceed to the final
stage of being W3C Recomendation:

  Web Storage (Second Edition)
  http://www.w3.org/TR/webstorage/
  deadline: January 8, 2016 (Friday!)

This specification is derived from an upstream WHATWG specification.

If there are comments you think Mozilla should send as part of the
review, or if you think Mozilla should voice support or opposition
to the specification, please say so in this thread.  (I'd note,
however, that there have been many previous opportunities to make
comments, so it's somewhat bad form to bring up fundamental issues
for the first time at this stage.)

(Sorry, should have sent these out a bit sooner.)

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla  https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
 What I was walling in or walling out,
 And to whom I was like to give offense.
   - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: Web Storage (Second Edition)

2016-01-06 Thread Anne van Kesteren
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:05 AM, L. David Baron  wrote:
> This specification is derived from an upstream WHATWG specification.

And therefore hasn't removed the storage mutex concept it seems. Not
sure if that's careworthy since we don't implement from TR/ anyway,
but I thought I'd mention it.


-- 
https://annevankesteren.nl/
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: Web Storage (Second Edition)

2016-01-07 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-01-07 08:52 +0100, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 6:05 AM, L. David Baron  wrote:
> > This specification is derived from an upstream WHATWG specification.
> 
> And therefore hasn't removed the storage mutex concept it seems. Not
> sure if that's careworthy since we don't implement from TR/ anyway,
> but I thought I'd mention it.

Could you give a brief explanation of what the storage mutex is, and
why it was/should be removed?

-David

-- 
𝄞   L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/   𝄂
𝄢   Mozilla  https://www.mozilla.org/   𝄂
 Before I built a wall I'd ask to know
 What I was walling in or walling out,
 And to whom I was like to give offense.
   - Robert Frost, Mending Wall (1914)


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform


Re: W3C Proposed Recommendation: Web Storage (Second Edition)

2016-01-07 Thread Andrew Overholt
On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren  wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 10:24 AM, L. David Baron  wrote:
> > Could you give a brief explanation of what the storage mutex is, and
> > why it was/should be removed?
>
> It prevents races for storage and cookies when your tabs run in
> independent processes. It was removed because nobody cared for
> implementing it.


Is that related to https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666724 ?
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform