date:20240526

[edk2-devel] [PATCH] ShellPkg/Pci.c: Update supported link speed to PCIe Gen6

2024-05-26 Thread Lien, HoraceX

From: HoraceX Lien 

REF: https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4779

Refer to PCI express base specification Reversion 6.2,
table 7-23 Link Capabilities Register.
Supported Link Speeds Vector bit 5: speed 64 GT/s.
Add the support to shell command 'pci'.

Signed-off-by: HoraceX Lien 
Cc: Zhichao Gao 
---
 ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/Pci.c | 6 ++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/Pci.c 
b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/Pci.c
index 7b11f49d0d..93622733a5 100644
--- a/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/Pci.c
+++ b/ShellPkg/Library/UefiShellDebug1CommandsLib/Pci.c
@@ -4809,6 +4809,9 @@ ExplainPcieLinkCap (
 case 5:
   MaxLinkSpeed = L"32.0 GT/s";
   break;
+case 6:
+  MaxLinkSpeed = L"64.0 GT/s";
+  break;
 default:
   MaxLinkSpeed = L"Reserved";
   break;
@@ -5015,6 +5018,9 @@ ExplainPcieLinkStatus (
 case 5:
   CurLinkSpeed = L"32.0 GT/s";
   break;
+case 6:
+  CurLinkSpeed = L"64.0 GT/s";
+  break;
 default:
   CurLinkSpeed = L"Reserved";
   break;
-- 
2.43.0.windows.1



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119273): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119273
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106325909/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202405

2024-05-26 Thread Wenxing Hou

Hi Liming,


Our PR: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5645 need to be merged too.
And the CryptoPkg maintainer Li Yi  can not add the Push label.

Could you please merge this PR?

Thanks,
Wenxing


From: gaoliming 
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 10:21 PM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Hou, Wenxing ; Kinney, Michael 
D ; 'Andrew Fish' ; 'Leif 
Lindholm' 
Cc: 'Ard Biesheuvel' ; sam.kay...@arm.com; 
dougfl...@microsoft.com; Mathews, John ; Li, Yi1 
; Yao, Jiewen 
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202405

Wenxing:
  We are in hard feature freeze phase. In this phase, only bug fixes will be 
accepted 
(https://github.com/tianocore/tianocore.github.io/wiki/HardFeatureFreeze).

So, this patch set may be merged after the stable tag is created.

Thanks
Liming
发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io 
mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> 代表 Wenxing Hou
发送时间: 2024年5月17日 23:10
收件人: gaoliming mailto:gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>>; 
Kinney, Michael D 
mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>; 
devel@edk2.groups.io; 'Andrew Fish' 
mailto:af...@apple.com>>; 'Leif Lindholm' 
mailto:quic_llind...@quicinc.com>>
抄送: 'Ard Biesheuvel' mailto:a...@kernel.org>>; 
sam.kay...@arm.com; 
dougfl...@microsoft.com; Mathews, John 
mailto:john.math...@intel.com>>; Li, Yi1 
mailto:yi1...@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen 
mailto:jiewen@intel.com>>
主题: Re: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202405

Hi Liming and Mike,

For the PATCH: Add more crypt APIs based on Mbedtls 
(https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118772),
I have fixed the code based on Mike’s feedback
and added the platform integration test table in commit message.

Could you approve this PATCH to catch this table tag?


Thanks,
Wenxing
From: gaoliming mailto:gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>>
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2024 8:49 AM
To: Kinney, Michael D 
mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>; 
devel@edk2.groups.io; 'Andrew Fish' 
mailto:af...@apple.com>>; 'Leif Lindholm' 
mailto:quic_llind...@quicinc.com>>
Cc: 'Ard Biesheuvel' mailto:a...@kernel.org>>; 
sam.kay...@arm.com; 
dougfl...@microsoft.com; Mathews, John 
mailto:john.math...@intel.com>>; Hou, Wenxing 
mailto:wenxing@intel.com>>; Li, Yi1 
mailto:yi1...@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen 
mailto:jiewen@intel.com>>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202405

Mike:
  Thanks for your comments. I update the status below.

Thanks
Liming
发件人: Kinney, Michael D 
mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>
发送时间: 2024年5月15日 0:35
收件人: gaoliming mailto:gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>>; 
devel@edk2.groups.io; 'Andrew Fish' 
mailto:af...@apple.com>>; 'Leif Lindholm' 
mailto:quic_llind...@quicinc.com>>
抄送: 'Ard Biesheuvel' mailto:a...@kernel.org>>; 
sam.kay...@arm.com; 
dougfl...@microsoft.com; Mathews, John 
mailto:john.math...@intel.com>>; Hou, Wenxing 
mailto:wenxing@intel.com>>; Li, Yi1 
mailto:yi1...@intel.com>>; Yao, Jiewen 
mailto:jiewen@intel.com>>; Kinney, Michael D 
mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>
主题: RE: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202405

Hi Liming,

My responses below in [Mike].

Mike


From: gaoliming mailto:gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>>
Sent: Friday, May 10, 2024 8:29 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Kinney, Michael D 
mailto:michael.d.kin...@intel.com>>; 'Andrew Fish' 
mailto:af...@apple.com>>; 'Leif Lindholm' 
mailto:quic_llind...@quicinc.com>>
Cc: 'Ard Biesheuvel' mailto:a...@kernel.org>>; 
sam.kay...@arm.com; 
dougfl...@microsoft.com; Mathews, John 
mailto:john.math...@intel.com>>; Hou, Wenxing 
mailto:wenxing@intel.com>>
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202405

Stewards:
  Now, there are several patches to catch this table tag. Could you give the 
comments for them?


1. Adding support for verbose UEFI Table dumping to Dmem.c 
(https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118582)

[Liming] This patch set has been reviewed before soft feature freeze. It plans 
to catch this stable tag.



[Mike] I see this PR: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5653 that is not 
passing CI and appears it will require additional code changes



[Mike] Reject for edk2-stable202405



2.  MdePkg/BaseLib: Fix AARCH64 compilation error 
(https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118690)

[Liming] This bug fix is reviewed in soft feature freeze phase. It plans to 
catch this stable tag.

[Mike] Approved for edk2-stable202405

[Liming] I add push label for https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/5642



3.  MdeModulePkg: Potential UINT32 overflow in S3 ResumeCount 
(https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118745)

[Liming] This security fix is reviewed in

Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] OvmfPkg: Add no hardcode version of FtdNorFlashQemuLib

2024-05-26 Thread xianglai


Hi Marcin:

W dniu 17.05.2024 o 09:17, Chao Li via groups.io pisze:

This library is copied from ArmVirtPkg, in the Arm version, the value of
PcdFlashNvStorageVariableBase, PcdFlashNvStorageFtwWorkingBase and
PcdFlashNvStorageFtwSpareBase are hardcoded in INC file.

This version will calculate them from FDT resource and using the set PCD
to store when the NorFlashInitialise is called. By default, the first
available flash(not used for storage UEFI code) as NV variable storage
medium.

In this way, UEFI can better handle the change of flash base address,
which is suitable for different cpu architecture board implementation.

BZ:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4770

Cc: Ard Biesheuvel
Cc: Leif Lindholm
Cc: Sami Mujawar
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann
Cc: Jiewen Yao
Signed-off-by: Chao Li
Signed-off-by: Xianglai Li


Can you split it into driver itself and part which uses DT data to 
setup parameters?


This way driver can be used on other platforms as well, despite do 
they hardcode flash data, read it via Firmware Handoff protocol, SMC 
calls to embedded controller or have other way to keep flash data.


This lib is provided for resolving pfalsh base addresses for virtual 
machines emulated by qemu.


The pfash base address of the arm and riscv architectures emulated by 
qemu is hardcoded in UEFI.
After this lib is committed, arm and riscv can easily use this lib by 
modifying the dsc and VarStore.fdf.inc files.
Later, we will send out the patch of arm and riscv, then arm and riscv 
will also be realized by resolving the pflash base address through fdt.


So, what other qemu emulation platforms do you think will hard-code fdt 
base addresses?:-)
Or are there specific scenarios that require hard-coded pflash base 
addresses?:-)


I admit that there is more flexibility, but do we really need to do 
that?:-)


Thanks!
Xianglai.



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119271): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119271
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106149595/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib:Do not assume BSP is #0.

2024-05-26 Thread Ni, Ray

I modified the commit message to add more Cc tags to by-pass CI checks.

And I found it has been merged. Thanks, Liming!


Thanks,
Ray

From: gaoliming 
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2024 20:00
To: devel@edk2.groups.io ; Ni, Ray ; 
Feng, Ning 
Subject: 回复: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib:Do not assume BSP is #0.


Ray:

  This PR doesn’t pass CI. Please check.



Thanks

Liming

发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io  代表 Ni, Ray
发送时间: 2024年5月25日 9:35
收件人: Feng, Ning ; devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray 
; Gao, Liming 
主题: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib:Do not assume BSP is #0.



I created PR for merge: UefiCpuPkg/MpLib:Do not assume BSP is #0. by niruiyu ・ 
Pull Request #5683 ・ tianocore/edk2 
(github.com)

But, I cannot set "push" label.



@Gao, Liming?



Thanks,

Ray



From: devel@edk2.groups.io 
mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>> on behalf of Ni, Ray 
mailto:ray...@intel.com>>
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2024 9:32
To: Feng, Ning mailto:ning.f...@intel.com>>; 
devel@edk2.groups.io 
mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>>
Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib:Do not assume BSP is #0.



Reviewed-by: Ray Ni mailto:ray...@intel.com>>



Thanks,

Ray



From: Feng, Ning mailto:ning.f...@intel.com>>
Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2024 15:42
To: devel@edk2.groups.io 
mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io>>
Cc: Feng, Ning mailto:ning.f...@intel.com>>; Ni, Ray 
mailto:ray...@intel.com>>
Subject: [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib:Do not assume BSP is #0.



REF:https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4778
MPInitlib have wrong expectation that BSP index should always be 0 in
MpInitLibInitialize(), SwitchBsp(),ApWakeupFunction().
That will cause the data mismatch, if the initial BSP is not 0.
Cc: Ray Ni mailto:ray...@intel.com>>
Signed-off-by: Ning Feng mailto:ning.f...@intel.com>>
---
 UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c | 47 ++--
 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c 
b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
index d724456502..ba497cbfd9 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/MpInitLib/MpLib.c
@@ -114,6 +114,10 @@ FutureBSPProc (
   SaveVolatileRegisters (>APInfo.VolatileRegisters);

   AsmExchangeRole (>APInfo, >BSPInfo);

   RestoreVolatileRegisters (>APInfo.VolatileRegisters, FALSE);

+  //

+  // Restore VolatileReg saved in CpuMpData->CpuData

+  //

+  CopyMem (>CpuData[DataInHob->BspNumber].VolatileRegisters, 
>APInfo.VolatileRegisters, sizeof (CPU_VOLATILE_REGISTERS));

 }



 /**

@@ -761,11 +765,11 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
   BistData = (UINT32)ApStackData->Bist;



   //

-  // CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters is initialized based on BSP 
environment,

+  // CpuMpData->CpuData[BspNumber].VolatileRegisters is initialized based 
on BSP environment,

   //   to initialize AP in InitConfig path.

-  // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters 
points to a different IDT shared by all APs.

+  // NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in 
CpuMpData->CpuData[BspNumber].VolatileRegisters points to a different IDT 
shared by all APs.

   //

-  RestoreVolatileRegisters (>CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters, 
FALSE);

+  RestoreVolatileRegisters 
(>CpuData[CpuMpData->BspNumber].VolatileRegisters, FALSE);

   InitializeApData (CpuMpData, ProcessorNumber, BistData, ApTopOfStack);

   ApStartupSignalBuffer = 
CpuMpData->CpuData[ProcessorNumber].StartupApSignal;

 } else {

@@ -798,10 +802,10 @@ ApWakeupFunction (
 // 1. AP is re-enabled after it's disabled, in either PEI or DXE phase.

 // 2. AP is initialized in DXE phase.

 // In either case, use the volatile registers value derived from BSP.

-// NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in CpuMpData->CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters 
points to a

+// NOTE: IDTR.BASE stored in 
CpuMpData->CpuData[BspNumber].VolatileRegisters points to a

 //   different IDT shared by all APs.

 //

-RestoreVolatileRegisters (>CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters, 
FALSE);

+RestoreVolatileRegisters 
(>CpuData[CpuMpData->BspNumber].VolatileRegisters, FALSE);

   } else {

 if (CpuMpData->ApLoopMode == ApInHltLoop) {

   //

@@ -927,7 +931,7 @@ DxeApEntryPoint (
 AsmWriteMsr64 (MSR_IA32_EFER, EferMsr.Uint64);

   }



-  RestoreVolatileRegisters (>CpuData[0].VolatileRegisters, FALSE);

+  RestoreVolatileRegisters 
(>CpuData[CpuMpData->BspNumber].VolatileRegisters, FALSE);

   InterlockedIncrement ((UINT32 *)>FinishedCount);

   PlaceAPInMwaitLoopOrRunLoop (

 CpuMpData->ApLoopMode,

@@ -2151,11 +2155,16 @@ MpInitLibInitialize (
   CpuMpData->BackupBufferSize = ApResetVectorSizeBelow1Mb;

[edk2-devel] Event: Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series - Monday, May 27, 2024 #cal-reminder

2024-05-26 Thread Group Notification

*Reminder: Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series*

*When:*
Monday, May 27, 2024
4:30pm to 5:30pm
(UTC-07:00) America/Los Angeles

*Where:*
https://teams.microsoft.com/l/meetup-join/19%3ameeting_ZDI2ZDg4NmMtMjI1My00MzI5LWFmYjAtMGQyNjUzNTBjZGYw%40thread.v2/0?context=%7b%22Tid%22%3a%2272f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2223af6561-6e1c-450d-b917-d9d674eb3cb6%22%7d

View Event ( https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/viewevent?eventid=2159800 )

*Description:*

TianoCore community,

Microsoft and Intel will be hosting a series of open meetings to discuss build, 
CI, tools, and other related topics. If you are interested, have ideas/opinions 
please join us. These meetings will be Monday 4:30pm Pacific Time on Microsoft 
Teams.

MS Teams Link in following discussion: * 
https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/discussions/2614

Anyone is welcome to join.

* tianocore/edk2: EDK II (github.com)
* tianocore/edk2-basetools: EDK II BaseTools Python tools as a PIP module 
(github.com) https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-basetools
* tianocore/edk2-pytool-extensions: Extensions to the edk2 build system 
allowing for a more robust and plugin based build system and tool execution 
environment (github.com) https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-pytool-extensions
* tianocore/edk2-pytool-library: Python library package that supports UEFI 
development (github.com) https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-pytool-library

MS Teams Browser Clients * 
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/get-clients?tabs=Windows#browser-client


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119269): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119269
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106322301/21656
Mute #cal-reminder:https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/mutehashtag/cal-reminder
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdePkg:Update UEFI version to 2.10

2024-05-26 Thread Li, Walon

Hi Mike,

Nope. I didn't try all changes with UEFI 2.10 specification. I just noticed 
that edk2 had been merged serval 2.10 changes but this version is still keeping 
to 2.7.
Only checked the UEFI version number in efi-shell (QEMU), it changes to 2.100 
from 2.70.
I'm neutral on this change, if you think we're not yet to declare edk2 is 2.10 
compliant this moment.

Thanks!
Walon

-Original Message-
From: Kinney, Michael D  
Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2024 12:59 AM
To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Li, Walon (UEFI Development) 
Cc: Lin, Derek (UEFI Development) ; 
gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn; Kinney, Michael D 
Subject: RE: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdePkg:Update UEFI version to 2.10

Have you verified that every feature from 2.10 is in edk2?

That includes both the include file content as well as all the Library/module 
implementations.

A platform can always update this version value in their tables if the platform 
is using a subset of features that are all 2.10 conformant.

Thanks,

Mike

> -Original Message-
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io  On Behalf Of Li, 
> Walon
> Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2024 7:49 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Lin2, Derek ; Li, Walon ; 
> gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn
> Subject: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdePkg:Update UEFI version to 2.10
> 
> Follow UEFI specification 2.10 to update system table revision.
> ---
>  MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h | 8 +---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h 
> b/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h index 79fc8c72ca..5cabb196b7 100644
> --- a/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h
> +++ b/MdePkg/Include/Uefi/UefiSpec.h
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
>  /** @file
> 
>Include file that supports UEFI.
> 
> 
> 
> -  This include file must contain things defined in the UEFI 2.7 
> specification.
> 
> -  If a code construct is defined in the UEFI 2.7 specification it 
> must be included
> 
> +  This include file must contain things defined in the UEFI 2.10
> specification.
> 
> +  If a code construct is defined in the UEFI 2.10 specification it 
> + must be
> included
> 
>by this include file.
> 
> 
> 
>  Copyright (c) 2006 - 2021, Intel Corporation. All rights 
> reserved.
> 
> @@ -1840,6 +1840,8 @@ EFI_STATUS
>  // EFI Runtime Services Table
> 
>  //
> 
>  #define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_SIGNATURE  SIGNATURE_64 ('I','B','I','
> ','S','Y','S','T')
> 
> +#define EFI_2_100_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION ((2 << 16) | (100))
> 
> +#define EFI_2_90_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (90))
> 
>  #define EFI_2_80_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (80))
> 
>  #define EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (70))
> 
>  #define EFI_2_60_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (60))
> 
> @@ -1852,7 +1854,7 @@ EFI_STATUS
>  #define EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((2 << 16) | (00))
> 
>  #define EFI_1_10_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((1 << 16) | (10))
> 
>  #define EFI_1_02_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION  ((1 << 16) | (02))
> 
> -#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION   EFI_2_70_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION
> 
> +#define EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION   EFI_2_100_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION
> 
>  #define EFI_SPECIFICATION_VERSION   EFI_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION
> 
> 
> 
>  #define EFI_RUNTIME_SERVICES_SIGNATURE  SIGNATURE_64
> ('R','U','N','T','S','E','R','V')
> 
> --
> 2.23.0.windows.1
> 
> 
> 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=
> Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
> View/Reply Online (#119071): 
> INVALID URI REMOVED
> 071__;!!NpxR!mB7x3kTUEcviqRRJF9uqlrvMWEVg0fQ3_tIm8s-W-zcDbaQMFZz9NxhOp
> eveHiQoACrlRk-Jru0nV8Zd_7TAIqI$ Mute This Topic: 
> https://groups.io/mt/106197340/1643496
> !NpxR!mB7x3kTUEcviqRRJF9uqlrvMWEVg0fQ3_tIm8s-W-zcDbaQMFZz9NxhOpeveHiQo
> ACrlRk-Jru0nV8Zd5SpoWG0$ Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
> Unsubscribe: 
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub
> pxR!mB7x3kTUEcviqRRJF9uqlrvMWEVg0fQ3_tIm8s-W-zcDbaQMFZz9NxhOpeveHiQoAC
> rlRk-Jru0nV8Zd2GYv47o$
> [michael.d.kin...@intel.com]
> -=-=-=-=-=-=
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#119268): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/119268
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/106197340/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

[edk2-devel] [PATCH] ShellPkg/Pci.c: Update supported link speed to PCIe Gen6

Re: [edk2-devel] Soft Feature Freeze starts now for edk2-stable202405

Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v1 1/2] OvmfPkg: Add no hardcode version of FtdNorFlashQemuLib

Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] UefiCpuPkg/MpLib:Do not assume BSP is #0.

[edk2-devel] Event: Tools, CI, Code base construction meeting series - Monday, May 27, 2024 #cal-reminder

Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] MdePkg:Update UEFI version to 2.10

6 matches

Site Navigation

Mail list logo

Footer information