RAM and page faults
As requested I xcan told you that with the latest cvs, smsc=at2 on windows2000 there are no RAM problems, by the way about 4 page faults every seconds. Everyone know why? Maybe due to cygwin dll, 1.1.8? Andrea
Re: RAM and page faults
> As requested I xcan told you that with the latest cvs, smsc=at2 on > windows2000 there are no RAM problems, > by the way about 4 page faults every seconds. Everyone know why? Maybe due > to cygwin dll, 1.1.8? don't know. You may try Cygwin 1.3.3-2 and see what happens. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de --- wapme.net - wherever you are
Re: Known bug in 1.1.4?
yes, it's a known bug on emi2 code.
use cvs/snapshot version or change your 1.1.4 somewhere in XSER encoding:
emimsg->fields[E50_NB] =
octstr_format("%04d", 8 * octstr_len(str));
to the %04d
--
Bruno David Rodrigues
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Rapaport" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "'Orazio. Granato@A-Tono. Com'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2001 5:26 PM
Subject: Known bug in 1.1.4?
>
> Hey all, my kannel version is based on 1.1.4.
>
> When trying to send binary SMS (e.g. ringtones)
> from an EMI2 group, I find myself sending invalid
> packages like this: (carriage returns added for readability)
> (...)
>
> Yes, that is a SPACE %20 you see in the indicated position, where there
> should be
> a length count. Definitely not part of the IA5 encoding.
Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?
do you get the panic even if you don't specify the dlr_* in http push ? 5.3.1 Submit Short Message operation (positive result) The following list shows the parameters in the positive result data field: Parameter Type Presence Description ACK Char "A" M Positive acknowledgement MVP String of char O Modified validity period SM String of char. O System message MVP is optional. DLR code should be aware of that and documentation should mention that too in dlr documentation. -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andreas Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:03 AM Subject: Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR? > > I've never seen a crash in smsbox because of this. SMSbox is > > unchanged as far as DLR's are concerned. If you got an assert, in > > your case, thats normal because your EMI reply is not what bearerbox > > would expect. Of course this should be fixed and is relatively easy > > to fix. But it also means that in your case DLR's will not work > > because no timestamp imformation is given back from the SMSC. > > Could you provide the fix for emi2 here? We would like to have again a > working CVS tree for development. > > BTW, please instruct me on how I can help you in figuring out if the > timestamp's are supported using our SMSC and I'll provide for > information on this. >
Re: Sms gateway performance...
I don't know about 300/sec but I once introduced a little bug in my code and my message was sent repeatedly :). I've hit my smsc account limit of 50/sec without any problem. Except that the guys didn't liked it very much :) And some days ago, there were another bug (not mine this time) and my kannel was hited by 23k messages to the same number in http interface in a period of three hours. Fortunatly the smsc blocked the number and only 165 messages were sent to him, but even then kannel behaved correctly and send/received every other message from smsc or from other http interfaces. Kannel has a persistant storage (store.lock) that worked ok to me too. There might be a limit of 100 messages to each emi connection because TRN in emi is only two digits and that way, kannel (and any other software) can only be waiting for a maximum of 100 ack's at any time. If you try it, tell us the experience, please. -- Bruno David Rodrigues - Original Message - From: "Basar Koprucu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 3:16 PM Subject: Sms gateway performance... > Hi there.. > Did anyone have experience, what the performance of kannel is, as an SMS > gateway? > (msgs / sec for a certain system) > (We are planning to connect it to an CMG gateway with 300 / sec... > What is the size of it's queue? How many messages can it handle? > > Any idea for storing queue on a persistent storage for crash recovery? > > > Thanks > Basar > > >
