Serial devices (was RE: Archives up)

2001-07-02 Thread Roy Smith

Yep

I've observed the same thing.

In at_data_read there is no code to check if the data read constitutes a
complete line, or just a fragment. The serial port is set to -ICANON, which
means that there is no buffering up to a LF being done by the OS.

Furthermore, there is no code to deal with the situation you describe, that
the data just read is in fact an incoming DeliverSM or Status Report.

I started to fix it, then gave up since I was creating too many 2nd order
problems elsewhere. My suggestion is that whoever wrote these components,
go back and revisit this problem, or document them sufficiently well that
others can take on the work without breaking everything.

I suspect that this code has only really been stressed with outound messages
since that is what most people seem to want to do (btw. what *is* a ringtone
?).

best
Roy




-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alexei Pashkovsky
Sent: 02 July 2001 12:10
To: Steve Kennedy; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Archives up
Importance: Low


Hi all,
I have a general question regarding Kannel and Serial device interfaces it
uses with Sema, AT, may be other modules..
I saw a few times situations when serial port call returns cut or corrupted
packet string, both in Sema and AT module (you may see this in AT when
message is coming and you try to send one same time, this causes Kannel to
make retries etc).
Same problem is with Sema (when there's an incoming packet request, and gw
tries to send outgoing one same time, reading from port gives corrupted
string).
Any serial device specialists with tips or propositions ?
Thanks :)







Re: Archives up

2001-07-02 Thread Alexei Pashkovsky

Hi all,
I have a general question regarding Kannel and Serial device interfaces it
uses with Sema, AT, may be other modules..
I saw a few times situations when serial port call returns cut or corrupted
packet string, both in Sema and AT module (you may see this in AT when
message is coming and you try to send one same time, this causes Kannel to
make retries etc).
Same problem is with Sema (when there's an incoming packet request, and gw
tries to send outgoing one same time, reading from port gives corrupted
string).
Any serial device specialists with tips or propositions ?
Thanks :)






Re: Archives up

2001-07-02 Thread Steve Kennedy

On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 09:26:39AM +0100, Nick Clarey wrote:

> Howdy,
> > > Just a quick note to let you all know that the archives are up. Check out;
> > > http://kannel.3glab.org/mailman/listinfo/
> > > and follow the archive link for the relevant list to see your name(s) in
> > > lights :->
> > I hope it's JUST names (not email addresses) as lists like
> > these just become SPAM targets.
> No, it's the whole kit-and-kaboodle, but I've changed permissions it so 
> that it can only be read by existing list members (with email address and 
> mailman password). This means people don't get access to anything except 
> what they'd have access to anyway by being list members.
> Is this ok, or hideously objectionable?

Sounds good to me.

Steve

-- 
NetTek Ltd  tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169  fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
Flat 2,43 Howitt Road,   Belsize Park,London NW3 4LU
mobile 07775 755503  Epage [EMAIL PROTECTED] [body only]




Re: Archives up

2001-07-02 Thread Nisan Bloch

Hi

no.. please leave them... Or enable archiving on mailman, so we can pull 
old messages and threads like b4.

Nisan
At 09:26 AM 7/2/01 +0100, Nick Clarey wrote:
>Howdy,
>
> > > Just a quick note to let you all know that the archives are up. Check 
> out;
> > > http://kannel.3glab.org/mailman/listinfo/
> > > and follow the archive link for the relevant list to see your name(s) in
> > > lights :->
> >
> > I hope it's JUST names (not email addresses) as lists like
> > these just become SPAM targets.
>
>No, it's the whole kit-and-kaboodle, but I've changed permissions it so
>that it can only be read by existing list members (with email address and
>mailman password). This means people don't get access to anything except
>what they'd have access to anyway by being list members.
>
>Is this ok, or hideously objectionable?
>
>See ya,
>
>Nick
>
>--
>Nick Clarey, System Architect| "Sometimes when you fill a vacuum,
>3G LAB   |  it still sucks."  - Rob Pike
>ph 44-1223-478900 fax 44-1223-478901 |





Re: Archives up

2001-07-02 Thread Nick Clarey

Howdy,

> > Just a quick note to let you all know that the archives are up. Check out;
> > http://kannel.3glab.org/mailman/listinfo/
> > and follow the archive link for the relevant list to see your name(s) in
> > lights :->
> 
> I hope it's JUST names (not email addresses) as lists like
> these just become SPAM targets.

No, it's the whole kit-and-kaboodle, but I've changed permissions it so 
that it can only be read by existing list members (with email address and 
mailman password). This means people don't get access to anything except 
what they'd have access to anyway by being list members.

Is this ok, or hideously objectionable?

See ya,

Nick

-- 
Nick Clarey, System Architect| "Sometimes when you fill a vacuum,
3G LAB   |  it still sucks."  - Rob Pike
ph 44-1223-478900 fax 44-1223-478901 |




Re: Archives up

2001-07-01 Thread Steve Kennedy

On Sun, Jul 01, 2001 at 01:39:21AM +0100, Nick Clarey wrote:

> Just a quick note to let you all know that the archives are up. Check out;
> http://kannel.3glab.org/mailman/listinfo/
> and follow the archive link for the relevant list to see your name(s) in
> lights :->

I hope it's JUST names (not email addresses) as lists like
these just become SPAM targets.

Steve

-- 
NetTek Ltd  tel +44-(0)20 7483 1169  fax +44-(0)20 7483 2455
Flat 2,43 Howitt Road,   Belsize Park,London NW3 4LU
mobile 07775 755503  Epage [EMAIL PROTECTED] [body only]




Archives up

2001-06-30 Thread Nick Clarey

Howdy all,

Just a quick note to let you all know that the archives are up. Check out;

http://kannel.3glab.org/mailman/listinfo/

and follow the archive link for the relevant list to see your name(s) in
lights :->

And before you ask...yes, we're working on search functionality, but
unfortunately mailman doesn't come with it by default :-<

See ya,

Nick