Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:18 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Note that if admins want to change the parameters passed to daemons they have a very easy way to do that in systemd: they can just copy the rpm-owned service file from /lib/systemd/system into /etc/systemd/systemd and then make their changes. So an admin can use the same file in both the following directories, but one dir must be called system without d and the other systemd with d? /lib/systemd/system/ /etc/systemd/systemd/ I would perceive that as unnecessarily inconsistent and confusing. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: trouble locally reproducing koji build error
Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com writes: Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated. You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error, which should give you more clues. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E And now for something completely different. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
2010/7/11 pbrobin...@gmail.com pbrobin...@gmail.com: I don't agree with the easier, and the releases are all built on tags. Well someone will have to get the policy added to the packaging guidelines. There's guidelines for using VC repos but not for using tar files from other distros source packages. Peter It seems no guideline forbid us to use tarballs extracted from upstream repo. I think using git repo for meego packages have more harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is people can validate the md5sum of the source tarball easily. Unless special case we can't find a way to get reliable souce tarballs, I think it's better to use tarballs rather than get source files from VCS. Meego repo is reliable place to get source tarballs, they also have bugzilla against those modules and they are the upstream. Also, it seems some meego packages don't have a public VCS(e.g. fennec-qt) or public VCS is not active currently(e.g. scim-panel-vkb-gtk[1]). Meego 1.0 use scim-panel-vkb-gtk 0.1.7, meego 1.1 use 0.1.8. but the latest version in the git repo is 0.1.6. [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615047 Regards, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rebuild of wxGTK without the internal crash handler in Rawhide
the result of the rebuild are: failed to build due the removed function, here I will prepare a fix multiget failed to build due other problems: audacity plee-the-bear ucblogo Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20100716 changes
Compose started at Fri Jul 16 08:15:19 UTC 2010 Broken deps for x86_64 -- BackupPC-3.1.0-14.1.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnarl-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.i686 requires libgnat-4.4.so PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.4.so()(64bit) PragmARC-20060427-6.fc13.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.4.so()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.2.14-2.fc14.i686 requires libebook-1.2.so.9 1:anerley-0.2.14-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libgladeui-1.so.9 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libgladeui-1.so.9()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libdevhelp-1.so.1()(64bit) 1:anjuta-2.30.0.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit) cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 cairo-java-1.0.5-12.fc12.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit) claws-mail-plugins-geolocation-3.7.6-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit) contact-lookup-applet-0.17-5.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) contacts-0.11-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) dap-freeform_handler-3.8.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libdap.so.10()(64bit) dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.14-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libdap.so.10()(64bit) dap-hdf4_handler-3.7.14-3.fc13.x86_64 requires libbes_dispatch.so.7()(64bit) dap-netcdf_handler-3.8.3-4.fc13.i686 requires libdap.so.10 dap-netcdf_handler-3.8.3-4.fc13.i686 requires libbes_dispatch.so.7 dap-netcdf_handler-3.8.3-4.fc13.x86_64 requires libdap.so.10()(64bit) dap-netcdf_handler-3.8.3-4.fc13.x86_64 requires libbes_dispatch.so.7()(64bit) dap-server-3.9.3-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libdap.so.10()(64bit) dap-server-3.9.3-2.fc12.x86_64 requires libbes_dispatch.so.7()(64bit) dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) dates-0.4.11-3.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.11()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.30.0-1.1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.12()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.30.0-1.1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) ekiga-3.2.7-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.1-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libchamplain-gtk-0.4.so.0()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.1-2.fc13.x86_64 requires libchamplain-0.4.so.0()(64bit) emerillon-devel-0.1.1-2.fc13.i686 requires pkgconfig(champlain-0.4) emerillon-devel-0.1.1-2.fc13.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(champlain-0.4) empathy-2.31.5.1-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-couchdb-0.4.92-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-exchange-2.31.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-exchange-2.31.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-book-1.2.so.2()(64bit) evolution-exchange-2.31.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) evolution-exchange-2.31.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) evolution-exchange-2.31.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-exchange-2.31.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libcamel-provider-1.2.so.17()(64bit) evolution-exchange-2.31.3-1.fc14.x86_64 requires libedata-cal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) evolution-rss-0.1.9-7.20100525git.fc14.x86_64 requires libwebkit-1.0.so.2()(64bit) evolution-rss-0.1.9-7.20100525git.fc14.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-editor.so.0()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.7()(64bit) evolution-sharp-0.21.1-7.fc14.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.9()(64bit) fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.i686 requires libgcj.so.10 fmt-ptrn-java-1.3.20-5.fc13.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.i386 requires libgcj.so.10 frysk-devel-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) frysk-gnome-0.4-26.fc14.x86_64 requires libgcj.so.10()(64bit) ghc-darcs-2.4.4-2.fc14.x86_64
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
2010/7/12 Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at: Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: I experienced this recently with another project (openSUSE's build service client) -- GitHub lets you download a project's tagged snapshots as tarballs, but Gitorious does not have this functionality. But on-demand autogenerated tarballs are evil because they usually don't have reproducible checksums, so there's no straightforward way to verify that the tarball has not been altered. Kevin Kofler The autogenerted tarballs from original moblin VCS[1] are not evil :), they have a permanent checksums. Unfortunately, meego moved all packages to gitorious which don't have the same feature. So I suggest to use tarballs extracted from upstream SRPM[1] instead of pulling source files directly from VCS to be easier for checking md5sum. Is it forbidden by fedora packaging guideline? When we keep consistent with upstream RPM version, we can also report some bugs to meego bugzilla directly. [1]http://git.moblin.org/cgit.cgi/scim-panel-vkb-gtk/ [2]http://repo.meego.com/ Regards, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
fre 2010-07-16 klockan 18:26 +0800 skrev Chen Lei: I think using git repo for meego packages have more harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is people can validate the md5sum of the source tarball easily. Unless special case we can't find a way to get reliable souce tarballs, I think it's better to use tarballs rather than get source files from VCS. This is not a valid argument. The guidelines specify how to document in the specfile how to reproduce a source tarball created from VCS. The reviewer in order to verify the source recreates the source using the given specification and compares his created copy with the one in the SRPM. I agree that this comparison would normally have to be done using diff -r rather than md5sum due to timestamps of directories and differences in user and group assignments of the checked out files, but the verification is still possible and valid. A checkout used in a SRPM should of course be done by giving a tag, revision or timestamp so that it can be reproduced at any later time. Using head/trunk/master without any such specification is not reproducible. Mattias smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rebuild of wxGTK without the internal crash handler in Rawhide
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 12:34:54 +0200, Dan wrote: the result of the rebuild are: failed to build due the removed function, here I will prepare a fix multiget failed to build due other problems: audacity Likely fall-out from the recent upgrade to GCC 4.5.0 a few days ago. plee-the-bear ucblogo Dan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
On Fri, 16.07.10 09:32, Hans Ulrich Niedermann (h...@n-dimensional.de) wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 16:18 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: Note that if admins want to change the parameters passed to daemons they have a very easy way to do that in systemd: they can just copy the rpm-owned service file from /lib/systemd/system into /etc/systemd/systemd and then make their changes. So an admin can use the same file in both the following directories, but one dir must be called system without d and the other systemd with d? /lib/systemd/system/ /etc/systemd/systemd/ I would perceive that as unnecessarily inconsistent and confusing. Sorry, that was a typo. It's /etc/systemd/system, too. (The story behind those names is that we eventually want to run as session managers too in which case the global user configuration is found in /etc/systemd/session and /usr/share/systemd/session) Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
2010/7/16 Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se: fre 2010-07-16 klockan 18:26 +0800 skrev Chen Lei: I think using git repo for meego packages have more harm than benefit, because the most important feature for rpm is people can validate the md5sum of the source tarball easily. Unless special case we can't find a way to get reliable souce tarballs, I think it's better to use tarballs rather than get source files from VCS. This is not a valid argument. The guidelines specify how to document in the specfile how to reproduce a source tarball created from VCS. The reviewer in order to verify the source recreates the source using the given specification and compares his created copy with the one in the SRPM. I agree that this comparison would normally have to be done using diff -r rather than md5sum due to timestamps of directories and differences in user and group assignments of the checked out files, but the verification is still possible and valid. Mattias Yes, it's no wrong to pull source from VCS, we can compare source files using diff -r, but it's not as easy as checking md5sum. Meego project have dozens of specific packages, it's not convenient to check source files for so many packages, also there are some packages don't have proper tags in meego VCS. Meego repo is a reliable place to get source and also the upstream, we don't have any security problem when using source files from upstream repo. If we have a easy way to get source files why we still use a hard way. Regrads, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Naming issue for meego 1.0 related packages
2010/7/16 Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org: But verifying a git tag is really easy too. I just disagree with you; if tarballs are provided, fine - if they aren't, it's trivial to use archives of git tags. -- Is there a script to help us to verify and pull sources from git repo? Meego project have dozens of packages(or maybe nearly one hundred packages), most of them don't provide tarballs at all except tarballs extracted from upstream SRPM. Also, some of them don't have a proper tag in the git repo or git version is older than SRPM version. Regards, Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
Le 15/07/2010 19:42, Till Maas a écrit : On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:04:49PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: In contrast to SSH it is very unlikely that dovecot will run on non-server systems. I am not sure how comm on it is, but I use dovecot to be able to access the mail that is stored on my desktop with both mutt and kmail. It is very common to run a local IMAP serveur for cross-MUA mail storage. MUA authors suck at backends and have not figured yet people like multiple clients pointing to the same storage. They write tons of import routines but want to keep copies in their own format in their own folders (and Thunderbird for example has no Maildir support at all years after every one else added it). These days it is much easier to set up a local dovecot than try to convince MUA authors to fix their stuff (and with squirrelmail you can even webmailize it) Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:11 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: These days it is much easier to set up a local dovecot than try to convince MUA authors to fix their stuff (and with squirrelmail you can even webmailize it) It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use that as your server. I don't do this because I don't want Google to have all my mail, and I know a few others who don't, but in my experience anyway, this seems to be a lot more common than running a private mail server, these days. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
Le 16/07/2010 17:29, Adam Williamson a écrit : It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use that as your server. Well, I assume that the scores of MUAs we still ship mean gmail has not taken over all our users yet. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:39:39 +0200 Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net wrote: Le 16/07/2010 17:29, Adam Williamson a écrit : It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use that as your server. Well, I assume that the scores of MUAs we still ship mean gmail has not taken over all our users yet. Gmail is available via POP and IMAP ... not antithetic to MUAs. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 17:39 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le 16/07/2010 17:29, Adam Williamson a écrit : It's even faster, however, to dump all your mail in GMail and use that as your server. Well, I assume that the scores of MUAs we still ship mean gmail has not taken over all our users yet. Well, not really. Even if no-one ran a personal mail server, we'd probably still have MUAs in Fedora. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 16:29 -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote: [ndim] nted: nted-doc-1.10.3-2.fc14.noarch nted-ntedfont-fonts-1.10.3-2.fc14.noarch Fixed in nted-1.10.12-2.fc14. [ndim] simulavr: simulavr-doc-0.1.2.6-6.fc13.noarch Fixed in simulavr-0.1.2.6-7.fc14. [ndim] terminus-fonts: terminus-fonts-console-4.30-1.fc13.noarch Fixed in terminus-fonts-4.30-2.fc14. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
On 7 July 2010 21:29, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: [jgu] emacs-auctex: tex-preview-11.86-2.fc14.noarch emacs-auctex-doc-11.86-2.fc14.noarch Fixed in rawhide (emacs-auctex-11.86-3) [jgu] shorewall: shorewall6-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch shorewall-lite-4.4.10-4.fc14.noarch Both false positives, shorewall[6]-lite sub-packages both contain COPYING file. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora 14 Alpha Blocker Meeting #1 Recap 2010-07-16
Meeting summary --- * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/showdependencytree.cgi?id=611990hide_resolved=1 (adamw, 16:03:18) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 (poelcat, 16:05:35) * LINK: http://tinyurl.com/2apxuo7 (adamw, 16:05:49) * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596985 remove from F14Alpha blocker--will reconsider if this bug impact turns out to be more widespread (poelcat, 16:11:18) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613695 (poelcat, 16:12:04) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_14_Pre-Alpha_Rawhide_Acceptance_Test_1 (adamw, 16:16:26) * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613695 request more information to determine if this bug breaks criterion or not (poelcat, 16:22:05) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613817 (poelcat, 16:22:20) * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=613817 keep as blocker unless feedback from devel is otherwise (poelcat, 16:31:45) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614488 (poelcat, 16:32:12) * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614488 leave as blocking f14alpha, need additional information (poelcat, 17:01:25) * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614538 (poelcat, 17:02:31) * ACTION: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=614538 accepted as a blocker (poelcat, 17:11:26) http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-07-16/fedora-bugzappers.2010-07-16-16.02.html 10:13:23 zodbot Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-07-16/fedora-bugzappers.2010-07-16-16.02.txt 10:13:23 zodbot Log: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-bugzappers/2010-07-16/fedora-bugzappers.2010-07-16-16.02.log.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 22:29, Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: [cdamian] sphinx: libsphinxclient-0.9.9-1.fc13.x86_64 this should be fixed in rawhide now -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in a crash backtrace
http://bugzilla.redhat.com/615422 What to do with this ticket? XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in the backtrace. What do other package maintainers do with such reports? Thread 1 (Thread 1787): #0 XCloseDisplay (dpy=0x99f9c08) at ClDisplay.c:74 ext = 0x0 i = value optimized out #1 0x060966e6 in pa_client_conf_from_x11 (c=0x99d7fa0, dname=value optimized out) at pulse/client-conf-x11.c:110 d = 0x99f9c08 ret = value optimized out t = 4642e92867766e162bfc28facd7f0356dff5d9b86f72d685dce47800bf4b4e2a4ec84dafbd4bbb9110e5a62a22b8a25019fbd6bec0dc1355a1696130bb0f8d7290a3baa23ef75a0b0064b9548733cb98ad1980248a440e42bd2fa2729e356ab9269e430b... __func__ = pa_client_conf_from_x11 __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = pa_client_conf_from_x11 #2 0x0606e970 in pa_context_new_with_proplist (mainloop=0x9a23f78, name=0x0, p=0x99f8668) at pulse/context.c:182 c = 0x99d89f0 __func__ = pa_context_new_with_proplist __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = pa_context_new_with_proplist #3 0x0087f55d in context_connect (c=0x9b9aa58, nofail=0) at pulse.c:242 l = 0x99f8668 p = 0x9965d08 ret = value optimized out __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = context_connect #4 0x0087f876 in pulse_driver_open (c=0x9b9aa58) at pulse.c:392 p = 0x9965d08 ret = value optimized out __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ = pulse_driver_open [...] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=432455 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-07-16
Minutes:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-07-16/fedora-releng.2010-07-16-17.01.html Minutes (text): http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-07-16/fedora-releng.2010-07-16-17.01.txt Log:http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora- meeting/2010-07-16/fedora-releng.2010-07-16-17.01.log.html Meeting summary --- * roll call (Oxf13, 17:01:16) * present are brunowolff poelcat notting jsmith nirik (Oxf13, 17:03:32) * Spins (Oxf13, 17:03:54) * rdieter also present (Oxf13, 17:05:42) * Spin owners must check in with testing before the go / no go date or risk having spin dropped (Oxf13, 17:37:44) * A slip of the release will reset the spin go / no go date as well and give MIA spin owners an extension (Oxf13, 17:38:05) * In case of a slip, if the updated packages are not on a spin, a re-test will not be needed (Oxf13, 17:38:25) * All releng requires is that testing be done. The amount of testing is to be determined by QA and the spin owners (Oxf13, 17:38:49) * releng will communicate to spin owners when RC phase starts, and when new packages are needed beyond nightly compose for future RCs (Oxf13, 17:39:26) * dist-git (Oxf13, 17:40:48) * Users can now use dist-git and fedpkg for cloning, committing, pushing, and building in koji.stg (Oxf13, 17:41:15) * oxf13 feels that we are pretty close to required functionality for initial roll out (Oxf13, 17:41:36) * new package creation and branch scripts have been modified to work with dist-git, as has the lookaside cgi (Oxf13, 17:41:59) * Need to detect broken conversions and attempt with git cvs-import (Oxf13, 17:49:41) * will try directory based upstream top level branches for target discovery (eg F-13/HEAD F-13/coolbranch) (Oxf13, 17:50:07) * We need to draft a roll out plan and present it to FESCo, complete with rollback plan (Oxf13, 17:51:00) * ACTION: We need people to start gathering a list of wiki pages that will need modifications for dist-git (Oxf13, 17:51:52) * ACTION: Oxf13 to talk to fedora admins about resources for pkgs.fedoraproject.org production dist-git server (Oxf13, 17:55:21) * open floor (Oxf13, 17:59:30) Meeting ended at 18:02:01 UTC. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in a crash backtrace
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 19:56 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/615422 What to do with this ticket? XLib, Pulse Audio and gtk2 in the backtrace. What do other package maintainers do with such reports? I'd pick any one of the components and CC the maintainers of all three, in the hopes that someone wants to own up =) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: bash auto completion
On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:42 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: Jonathan MERCIER wrote: why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ? me i add in bashrc: for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done instead . /etc/bash_compeltion = because do not works file do not exist! This question is probably better suited the the users list¹. But, I'm going to guess that you don't have the bash-completion package installed. That is what provides /etc/bash_completion. ¹ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users/ I don't think this is quite true, since it looks like the contents of /etc/bash_completion.d are installed by various RPMs. Maybe this is what's causing confusion. $ rpm -qf /etc/bash_completion.d yum-3.2.27-4.fc13.noarch rpmdevtools-7.8-1.fc13.noarch yum-utils-1.1.27-2.fc13.noarch PackageKit-0.6.6-1.fc13.x86_64 In more detail: $ for i in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do echo $i; rpm -qf $i; done /etc/bash_completion.d/acroread.sh AdobeReader_enu-9.3.2-1.i486 /etc/bash_completion.d/dbus-bash-completion.sh dbus-glib-devel-0.86-1.fc13.x86_64 /etc/bash_completion.d/gvfs-bash-completion.sh gvfs-1.6.2-1.fc13.x86_64 /etc/bash_completion.d/pk-completion.bash PackageKit-0.6.6-1.fc13.x86_64 /etc/bash_completion.d/rpmdevtools.bash-completion rpmdevtools-7.8-1.fc13.noarch /etc/bash_completion.d/yum-utils.bash yum-utils-1.1.27-2.fc13.noarch /etc/bash_completion.d/yum.bash -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
Till Maas wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 04:18:06PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: On Thu, 15.07.10 08:58, Till Maas (opensou...@till.name) wrote: On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 03:30:41AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: And why should acpid go away? What is there that can be used instead? Used for what exactly? To react on ACPI events, e.g. when the lid of a notebook is opened[0] or when the notebook is removed from a docking station. upowerd handles this now. It looks like it is as bad documented as hal. At least the manpages on freedesktop.org[1] did not provide any information about what one can do with it. Acpid has a very good manpage that shows how one can easily add scripts that react to any ACPI event. I have a use case which does not involve power management. Some keys on my Thinkpad generate ACPI events which I can assign to scripts run by acpid. For example the ThinkVantage button is mapped to 'sync' (acpid is one of the things which manages to work even on a half-crashed system), then I mapped some Fn-F[1-12] combinations to other system wide functions. One is mapped to kill -STOP/-CONT all running firefox processes, which I use to save battery while reading webpages, excluding the instants when I scroll or change tab. Another one helps with the display brightness control (detect brightness+ key - run command to increase brightness). Another one is used to activate the screensaver/screenlock when walking away from the machine; maybe this one could have been done in a session context, but Fn-F1 is really well positioned to be reached by my fingers. -- Roberto Ragusamail at robertoragusa.it -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: bash auto completion
Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 21:42 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote: Jonathan MERCIER wrote: why default bahrc do not contain all file in /etc/bash_completion.d ? me i add in bashrc: for file in /etc/bash_completion.d/*; do . $file; done instead . /etc/bash_compeltion = because do not works file do not exist! This question is probably better suited the the users list¹. But, I'm going to guess that you don't have the bash-completion package installed. That is what provides /etc/bash_completion. ¹ https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users/ I don't think this is quite true, since it looks like the contents of /etc/bash_completion.d are installed by various RPMs. Maybe this is what's causing confusion. Packages may drop bash_completion files in /etc/bash_completion.d and not require bash-completion. So they own that dir. To enable bash-completion fully, install the bash-completion package. I still think this is a users list question though. :) -- ToddOpenPGP - KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ I don't mean to sound cold, or cruel, or vicious, but I am, so that's the way it comes out. -- Bill Hicks pgpMMzt0hyvv6.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: bash auto completion
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 12:21:40PM -0700, Jonathan Ryshpan wrote: But, I'm going to guess that you don't have the bash-completion package installed. That is what provides /etc/bash_completion. I don't think this is quite true, since it looks like the contents of /etc/bash_completion.d are installed by various RPMs. Maybe this is what's causing confusion. Actually, it's exactly true, *and* it's what's causing confusion. :) -- Matthew Miller mat...@mattdm.org Senior Systems Architect -- Instructional Research Computing Services Harvard School of Engineering Applied Sciences -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: trouble locally reproducing koji build error
On Friday 16 July 2010 00:36:31 Andreas Schwab wrote: Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated. You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error, which should give you more clues. Thanks for the suggestion. I did that and got a more verbose and detailed log.[1] Unfortunately I'm not a big enough c++/boost guru to know what it means. I'll keep banging away at it though. And I still don't know why it can't be reproduced outside of koji. I even tried the build on one of Kevin's public machines (rawhide was natively installed there), and the error did not reproduce. -Zach [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2324390name=build.log ... | include boost/program_options.hpp | int | main () | { | boost::program_options::variables_map::variables_map dummy() | ; | return 0; | } configure:18263: g++ -o conftest -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 - fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic conftest.cpp -lboost_program_options -lboost_system -lboost_regex - lboost_program_options-mt 5 conftest.cpp: In function 'int main()': conftest.cpp:58:1: error: 'boost::program_options::variables_map::variables_map' names the constructor, not the type conftest.cpp:58:54: error: expected ';' before 'dummy' conftest.cpp:59:3: error: statement cannot resolve address of overloaded function configure:18263: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: ... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Feature 14: D programming
On 07/15/2010 07:41 AM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: hi everybody ldc compiler is in testing repos, i search some guy for test and increase his karma thanks link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldc-0.9.2-1.2.20100706hg1653.fc13 Is it possible to do anything useful with just ldc? [or...@orca build]$ cat test.d int main(char[][] args) {return args.sizeof-1;} [or...@orca build]$ ldc test.d object.d: Error: module object cannot read file 'object.d' Should ldc Require at runtime development library (tango?) like gcc Requires glibc-devel? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 09:42:33PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: I have a use case which does not involve power management. Some keys on my Thinkpad generate ACPI events which I can assign to scripts run by acpid. Keys also all generate input events, and the /proc/acpi/events interface is slated to die before too much longer. acpid is going to have to die before too much longer, but it would be good to replace it with something that can listen to arbitrary input events. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[389-devel] Please review: Bug 547503 - replication broken again, with 389 MMR replication and TCP errors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=547503 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=432492action=diff https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=432492action=edit -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: trouble locally reproducing koji build error
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 20:52, Zach Carter z.car...@f5.com wrote: On Friday 16 July 2010 00:36:31 Andreas Schwab wrote: Any insight, tips or pointers would be much appreciated. You could modify the spec file to cat the config.log file on error, which should give you more clues. Thanks for the suggestion. I did that and got a more verbose and detailed log.[1] Unfortunately I'm not a big enough c++/boost guru to know what it means. I'll keep banging away at it though. And I still don't know why it can't be reproduced outside of koji. I even tried the build on one of Kevin's public machines (rawhide was natively installed there), and the error did not reproduce. -Zach [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2324390name=build.log ... | include boost/program_options.hpp | int | main () | { | boost::program_options::variables_map::variables_map dummy() | ; | return 0; | } configure:18263: g++ -o conftest -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 - fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m64 -mtune=generic conftest.cpp -lboost_program_options -lboost_system -lboost_regex - lboost_program_options-mt 5 conftest.cpp: In function 'int main()': conftest.cpp:58:1: error: 'boost::program_options::variables_map::variables_map' names the constructor, not the type conftest.cpp:58:54: error: expected ';' before 'dummy' conftest.cpp:59:3: error: statement cannot resolve address of overloaded function configure:18263: $? = 1 configure: failed program was: ... Well the problem is obvious. The line in the test program should be: boost::program_options::variables_map dummy() and not: boost::program_options::variables_map::variables_map dummy() I however know very little about autotools (and don't intend on ever learning either) so how to actually fix it is another matter. If the configuration scripts are generated during the build maybe there is something going on there. As a temporary workaround perhaps it might be possible to just use sed to change the line in the configuration scripts after they are generated. -- There are 10 kinds of people in the world: Those who understand binary and those who don't... -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
tor 2010-07-15 klockan 08:58 +0200 skrev Till Maas: How are the /etc/sysconfig/service files now used? E.g. on F12 ntpd drops privs to ntp:ntp according to /etc/sysconfing/ntpd, but ntpd.service file seems not to do something like this. So how about this: If /etc/sysconfig/service exists and contains any line that's not a comment, empty or only whitespace, then systemd should fall back to the SysV script. Then push updates to the packages containing the sysconfig files and start scripts such that the variables are commented out in the sysconfig file and the default values are set in the start script instead, before sourceing the sysconfig file. In case the admin modifies the sysconfig file and then updates the system to use systemd, that sysconfig file won't be replaced and will probably contain something that triggers systemd to fall back to SysV style there. /Alexander -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
On Fri, Jul 09, 2010 at 12:28:46PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote: I would suggest doing PGO for the following: The kernel? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com Fedora now supports 80 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#) http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
On Thu, Jul 08, 2010 at 06:17:49PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote: It's pretty hard to imagine what you could preserve across builds of nontrivially nonidentical source trees that would continue to line up at the basic block level where it's meaningful to the compiler. Perhaps you could do something reduced to terms of source line locations, or number of basic blocks into a named function, or something. But it sounds very iffy. Can the results be folded back into the source code in any way, eg as comments or __attributes__? Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13
Bojan Smojver bojan at rexursive.com writes: Bojan Smojver bojan at rexursive.com writes: Could someone with enough karma rebuild krb5-auth-dialog 0.16 for F-13 (this is in relation to bug #597669). The 0.15 is leaking memory like there is no tomorrow and I'm not getting much traction from the assignee of the bug... Thank you! (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=183791) Tested and leaks appear to have been fixed. So, ready for updates. -- Bojan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: gcc-4.5-RH in F14
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: On 07/13/2010 11:55 AM, Brandon Lozza wrote: I'm going to keep a personal note of the apps which do perform faster and grab the src rpm's so that I can compile them myself with LTO. Jakub Jelinek said that LTO isn't really usable in 4.5. 'so that I can compile them myself with LTO.' :) It won't effect you guys, not doing anything official with it. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
In article 20100716120023.4468b...@willson.li.ssimo.org you wrote: Gmail is available via POP and IMAP ... not antithetic to MUAs. The IMAP is actually pretty non-standard. Enough to be usable, but broken beyond that. The tag/folder translation is horrible. A move requires two passes to get it right. The first sync gets it tagged as 'trash' the second sync cleans up the trash now that the message has a tag in the target directory. AFAIK, it's NOTABUG on their end. --Ben -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [HEADS-UP] The systemd unit files I'll post
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:48:44PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote: I do not see events generated by those keys. That is, if I run xev I see events for some buttons (VolumeUp, Mute) but nothing for others (ThinkVantage and many Fn-F?? combinations). This is on Fedora-10, anyway. (...I know, I know, unsupported etc...) Yeah. Run something newer. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
On 07/12/2010 05:38 PM, Jeff Spaleta wrote: On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Przemek Klosowski przemek.klosow...@nist.gov wrote: If you kill all of them you'd get rid of the ones you suggested for a legit AutoQA tests. Yes I would. And I'm okay with that. Since there been no work done to identify any scripts yet there's no real work lost. I agree about the ugliness of modifying every example file. Perhaps a directory examplesThatShouldWork with symlinks to the OK set? Maybe that's too obtrusive. What about a script that would be the basis for the autoQA run: /usr/share/doc/python-matplotlib-0.99.1.2/examples/README.fedora You write the script that operates like you want with all the examples which appear to be working out of the box for you and submit it as a bug report and we''ll rework it as necessary and get something in place in the 1.0.0 packaging in rawhide. OK, I attached the script to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582026 IT is ugly---should probably be rewritten as a loop over the result of 'find /usr/share/doc/python-matplotlib-0.99.1.2/examples -name *.py' with a blacklist of files that I know don't work Also note that several of the examples may not actually run form the examples directory because they write output files and assume they can write to current directory. Take that into considering in your script. Those examples are blacklisted (commented out). For testing maybe they could be run by 'cd /tmp ; python $EXAMPLES/example.py; popd' If it works well enough, I might be able to use as an additional build time test in the rpm build regardless of whether autoQA is available. At present the script opens over 300 windows, which have to be closed manually. I coudn't think of an automatic way of closing them; how does AutoQA going to deal with the problem of testing GUI apps? As crazy as this script is, I really think that all packages need such testing by execution over a body of known-good examples. Again, the trick is how to do it for GUI apps. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2010, 21:34 -0700 schrieb Matt McCutchen: On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 13:22 +0200, Christoph Wickert wrote: It is indeed documented in the wiki: If there are bugs which you aren't capable of fixing yourself because they deal with intricacies of the source code which you don't fully understand, then you still need to address these bugs. It can be helpful to work with the upstream maintainer of the code, ... see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_maintainer_responsibilities It's not clear to me whether that refers to true upstream bugs or only to Fedora-specific bugs that are too intricate to solve without upstream help. It refers to bugs and thus *covers* all bugs. You should first try to fix it yourself and upstream the fix if it's not Fedora specific. If you cannot fix the problem yourself, ask upstream for help. Regards, Christoph -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Feature 14: D programming
Le vendredi 16 juillet 2010 à 14:32 -0600, Orion Poplawski a écrit : On 07/15/2010 07:41 AM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote: hi everybody ldc compiler is in testing repos, i search some guy for test and increase his karma thanks link: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ldc-0.9.2-1.2.20100706hg1653.fc13 Is it possible to do anything useful with just ldc? [or...@orca build]$ cat test.d int main(char[][] args) {return args.sizeof-1;} [or...@orca build]$ ldc test.d object.d: Error: module object cannot read file 'object.d' Should ldc Require at runtime development library (tango?) like gcc Requires glibc-devel? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com Thanks for your try, for do something usefull, you need use tango (if someone would like review it :) )link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069 rebuild rpm from src.rpms and install tango-devel tango yum can use example in tango-example -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 603249] ocaml-mikmatch-devel does not work because the tophide dependency is missing
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603249 Subhendu Ghosh sgh...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||615526 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ ocaml-devel mailing list ocaml-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/ocaml-devel
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
At present the script opens over 300 windows, which have to be closed manually. I coudn't think of an automatic way of closing them; how does AutoQA going to deal with the problem of testing GUI apps? I think wmctrl would help here. Rich -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
gthumb now orphaned?
One of the gthumb bug (588039) has been generating a lot of duplicate bug entries in Bugzilla -- 2.11.x versions prior to 2.11.4 fail at startup on DRI-less systems due to a hard reliance on Clutter (the same way mutter would fail on such systems). That bug itself is on QA, now that 2.11.5 is in Rawhide (thanks, Matthias). I've simply rebuilt and pushed an F-13 update based on the Rawhide spec. I've noticed when cleaning up the dupes that the package is now orphaned (the newer bug entries are owned by the orphan username). Since PkgDb lists the package as having a lot of co-maintainers, would one of them volunteer to be the new owner? Also, what happened to Behdad? Best regards, -- Michel Alexandre Salim Fedora Project Contributor: http://fedoraproject.org/ Email: sali...@fedoraproject.org | GPG key ID: 78884778 Jabber: hir...@jabber.ccc.de | IRC: hir...@irc.freenode.net () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Question regarding dist-git aesthetics with branches
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've been struggling with a particular wrinkle in dist-git, how fedpkg is supposed to reliably discover what Fedora release a packager is working on. In the CVS world, we used a branch file. This is OK, but I think it would be cleaner if we didn't have to rely upon that. It's the last file that wouldn't be exact across all the Fedora releases if a package is kept in sync. So what I'd like to do is rely upon discovering the top level upstream branch, say F-13. This gets difficult if we allow maintainers to create and operate on their own upstream branches (which we should), as I have not found a reliable way to work from a local branch to which remote branch it tracks to which top level remote branch it was created from. One suggestion has been to make use of directory based branching, so that any maintainer created branch is in a subdir of a top level branch. EG we'd a user could create an F-13/kernel-2.7 branch, and call it whatever they want locally. fedpkg would be able to work from the local branch name to what it tracks (origin/F-13/kernel-2.7) and walk down the path from origin/ to discover F-13. Then fedpkg can assume F-13 for the branch and do all the dist conversions and koji target discovery from that. This doesn't put too much restraint on what maintainers call their branches, particularly locally. The wrinkle with the above though is the base top level branch. When we do this with directories, it's not possible to have a simple origin/F-13 branch that a user could interact with (git checkout F-13 would automatically detect that there is an origin/F-13 remote branch and setup a local F-13 branch to track it and still allow for an F-13/foobar branch. So we have to make the first base upstream branch F-13/something. One suggested something has been to call it HEAD, because git seems to have another short cut that would allow you to do git checkout -b origin/F-13 and since it finds an origin/F-13/HEAD it will automatically use that. HEAD seems to be a special name in this context. However it is pointed out that using HEAD here could be confusing to people who are more familiar with git and naming conventions. Another suggestion is to call it F-13/master since master is a more appropriate and expected name. However that means you can't use the short cut and have to do a full git checkout -b F-13 origin/F-13/master. Since you have to use the full path here, we aren't bound by the name master and we could name it anything we want, something that might make sense to Fedora or dist-git. Now, these are fairly low details which can be hidden behind fedpkg (there is a proposed patch to give fedpkg a 'switch-branch' command that will switch you from one to the other, and we can make calls to F-13 attempt origin/F-13/master or whatever), but I feel that this is a detail I shouldn't just decide on my own. So, I welcome the discussion. I also welcome anybody challenging the above assumptions and showing us an even better way of managing the branch naming and discovering client side what Fedora target a maintainer wishes to work against. I will however put some constraints on that. A maintainer shouldn't have to modify anything in their local clone to indicate what target, fedpkg should be able to do a clone of a repo, switch to a branch (which may be a branch of a branch of a branch) and be able to discover what the target should be. Thanks! - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxA9DgACgkQ4v2HLvE71NU9hwCghhorcU8oz/gAWKk3h76q+h7r T2sAn0MfdRwHR+niHYQPIAWkaMhHLF1f =xc1g -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bug 531464 - why the WONTFIX?
On Sat, 2010-07-17 at 09:55 +1000, David Timms wrote: Would it it be useful for abrt to automatically submit bugs to such a thing ? This wouldn't pollute either fedora's or upstream bug systems, yet it would capture vital info (backtrace) that would otherwise go missing. With some marketing, it might be possible for upstream developers to want to be subscribed to their apps external bug info ? Will Woods was talking about setting up a separate db for abrt crashes a while back, IIRC. Dunno what happened to that idea. Might just be ENOTIME. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
source url when upstream disappears (geocities)
I vaguely remember something about this, but can't find it in wiki or list archives: My upstream hasn't updated in years, but the package (glglobe) still builds for fedora and epel. Late in 2009, it appears that the upstream hosting site was closed: http://www.geocities.com (now yahoo). However, www.oocities.com has chosen to create an archive of various parts of geocities, and hence the original web pages and source are available within the archive; it then has a different URL. Since rpmlint complains, W invalid-URL, for the URL and Source0, it it acceptable to point to the archive site ? Concern would be: - the archive places the content in a frame, so it's not exactly the same look - content could get changed by someone else - linked source could get changed by someone else. Should I update the URL ? I was thinking to comment the original URL Source indicating the original site, but then change the tagged lines to the oocities versions. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: gthumb now orphaned?
On 07/17/2010 04:57 AM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: One of the gthumb bug (588039) has been generating a lot of duplicate bug entries in Bugzilla -- 2.11.x versions prior to 2.11.4 fail at startup on DRI-less systems due to a hard reliance on Clutter (the same way mutter would fail on such systems). That bug itself is on QA, now that 2.11.5 is in Rawhide (thanks, Matthias). I've simply rebuilt and pushed an F-13 update based on the Rawhide spec. I've noticed when cleaning up the dupes that the package is now orphaned (the newer bug entries are owned by the orphan username). Since PkgDb lists the package as having a lot of co-maintainers, would one of them volunteer to be the new owner? Also, what happened to Behdad? Behdad now works for Google. http://mces.blogspot.com/2010/06/june.html Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Broken dependencies: perl-DBI-Dumper
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) On i386: perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-B-Compiling: fce284d7a9914c9847694960235db72a B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-13 perl-B-Compiling.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29267/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-B-Compiling.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE perl-B-Compiling.spec --- Name: perl-B-Compiling Version:0.02 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Expose PL_compiling to perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Compiling/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/B-Compiling-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %{?perl_default_filter} %description This module exposes the perl interpreter's PL_compiling variable to perl. %prep %setup -q -n B-Compiling-%{version} %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/B* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-13/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Jul 2010 17:47:47 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-13/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Jul 2010 17:47:47 - 1.1 +++ sources 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fce284d7a9914c9847694960235db72a B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-12 perl-B-Compiling.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29267/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-B-Compiling.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE perl-B-Compiling.spec --- Name: perl-B-Compiling Version:0.02 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Expose PL_compiling to perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Compiling/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/B-Compiling-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %{?perl_default_filter} %description This module exposes the perl interpreter's PL_compiling variable to perl. %prep %setup -q -n B-Compiling-%{version} %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/B* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Jul 2010 17:47:47 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Jul 2010 17:47:47 - 1.1 +++ sources 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fce284d7a9914c9847694960235db72a B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-B-Compiling/devel perl-B-Compiling.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29267/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-B-Compiling.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE perl-B-Compiling.spec --- Name: perl-B-Compiling Version:0.02 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Expose PL_compiling to perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Compiling/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/B-Compiling-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %{?perl_default_filter} %description This module exposes the perl interpreter's PL_compiling variable to perl. %prep %setup -q -n B-Compiling-%{version} %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/B* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Jul 2010 17:47:47 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Jul 2010 17:47:47 - 1.1 +++ sources 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +fce284d7a9914c9847694960235db72a B-Compiling-0.02.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-13 perl-B-Compiling.spec,1.1,1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29452/F-13 Modified Files: perl-B-Compiling.spec Log Message: * Sat Jul 17 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-2 - cleanup spec for modern rpmbuild Index: perl-B-Compiling.spec === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/F-13/perl-B-Compiling.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- perl-B-Compiling.spec 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.1 +++ perl-B-Compiling.spec 17 Jul 2010 05:46:06 - 1.2 @@ -1,12 +1,11 @@ Name: perl-B-Compiling Version:0.02 -Release:1%{?dist} +Release:2%{?dist} Summary:Expose PL_compiling to perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Compiling/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/B-Compiling-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) @@ -25,8 +24,6 @@ This module exposes the perl interpreter make %{?_smp_mflags} %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; @@ -38,9 +35,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exe %check make test -%clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README @@ -49,5 +43,8 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Sat Jul 17 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-2 +- cleanup spec for modern rpmbuild + * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-B-Compiling/devel perl-B-Compiling.spec,1.1,1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv29452/devel Modified Files: perl-B-Compiling.spec Log Message: * Sat Jul 17 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-2 - cleanup spec for modern rpmbuild Index: perl-B-Compiling.spec === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-B-Compiling/devel/perl-B-Compiling.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- perl-B-Compiling.spec 17 Jul 2010 05:44:42 - 1.1 +++ perl-B-Compiling.spec 17 Jul 2010 05:46:06 - 1.2 @@ -1,12 +1,11 @@ Name: perl-B-Compiling Version:0.02 -Release:1%{?dist} +Release:2%{?dist} Summary:Expose PL_compiling to perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/B-Compiling/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/B-Compiling-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Exporter) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) @@ -25,8 +24,6 @@ This module exposes the perl interpreter make %{?_smp_mflags} %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; @@ -38,9 +35,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exe %check make test -%clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README @@ -49,5 +43,8 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Sat Jul 17 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-2 +- cleanup spec for modern rpmbuild + * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.02-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Devel-Declare: 5daf4af74683f57e516ffc9efdc14eae Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/devel perl-Devel-Declare.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/devel In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30571/devel Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Devel-Declare.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE perl-Devel-Declare.spec --- Name: perl-Devel-Declare Version:0.006000 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Adding keywords to perl, in perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Declare/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Devel-Declare-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.1 # for test - not yet in fedora # BuildRequires: perl(B::Compiling) BuildRequires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) = 0.05 BuildRequires: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.18 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Depends) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Name) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88 # necessary minimum versions not automatically detected Requires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) = 0.05 Requires: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.18 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %{?perl_default_filter} %description Devel::Declare can install subroutines called declarators which locally take over Perl's parser, allowing the creation of new syntax. %prep %setup -q -n Devel-Declare-%{version} %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/Devel* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.006000-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Jul 2010 17:48:08 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Jul 2010 05:48:44 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Jul 2010 17:48:08 - 1.1 +++ sources 17 Jul 2010 05:48:44 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +5daf4af74683f57e516ffc9efdc14eae Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-12 perl-Devel-Declare.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-12 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30571/F-12 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Devel-Declare.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE perl-Devel-Declare.spec --- Name: perl-Devel-Declare Version:0.006000 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Adding keywords to perl, in perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Declare/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Devel-Declare-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.1 # for test - not yet in fedora # BuildRequires: perl(B::Compiling) BuildRequires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) = 0.05 BuildRequires: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.18 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Depends) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Name) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88 # necessary minimum versions not automatically detected Requires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) = 0.05 Requires: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.18 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %{?perl_default_filter} %description Devel::Declare can install subroutines called declarators which locally take over Perl's parser, allowing the creation of new syntax. %prep %setup -q -n Devel-Declare-%{version} %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/Devel* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.006000-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-12/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Jul 2010 17:48:08 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Jul 2010 05:48:44 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-12/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Jul 2010 17:48:08 - 1.1 +++ sources 17 Jul 2010 05:48:44 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +5daf4af74683f57e516ffc9efdc14eae Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-13 perl-Devel-Declare.spec, NONE, 1.1 .cvsignore, 1.1, 1.2 sources, 1.1, 1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv30571/F-13 Modified Files: .cvsignore sources Added Files: perl-Devel-Declare.spec Log Message: initial import --- NEW FILE perl-Devel-Declare.spec --- Name: perl-Devel-Declare Version:0.006000 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Adding keywords to perl, in perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Declare/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Devel-Declare-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.1 # for test - not yet in fedora # BuildRequires: perl(B::Compiling) BuildRequires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) = 0.05 BuildRequires: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.18 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Depends) BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Name) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88 # necessary minimum versions not automatically detected Requires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) = 0.05 Requires: perl(B::Hooks::OP::Check) = 0.18 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %{?perl_default_filter} %description Devel::Declare can install subroutines called declarators which locally take over Perl's parser, allowing the creation of new syntax. %prep %setup -q -n Devel-Declare-%{version} %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE=$RPM_OPT_FLAGS make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f {} \; find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; %{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* %check make test %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README %{perl_vendorarch}/auto/* %{perl_vendorarch}/Devel* %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.006000-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. Index: .cvsignore === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-13/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- .cvsignore 16 Jul 2010 17:48:08 - 1.1 +++ .cvsignore 17 Jul 2010 05:48:44 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz Index: sources === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-13/sources,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- sources 16 Jul 2010 17:48:08 - 1.1 +++ sources 17 Jul 2010 05:48:44 - 1.2 @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +5daf4af74683f57e516ffc9efdc14eae Devel-Declare-0.006000.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-13 perl-Devel-Declare.spec,1.1,1.2
Author: iarnell Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-13 In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31538 Modified Files: perl-Devel-Declare.spec Log Message: * Sat Jul 17 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.006000-2 - cleanup spec for modern rpmbuild Index: perl-Devel-Declare.spec === RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Devel-Declare/F-13/perl-Devel-Declare.spec,v retrieving revision 1.1 retrieving revision 1.2 diff -u -p -r1.1 -r1.2 --- perl-Devel-Declare.spec 17 Jul 2010 05:48:44 - 1.1 +++ perl-Devel-Declare.spec 17 Jul 2010 05:52:51 - 1.2 @@ -1,13 +1,11 @@ Name: perl-Devel-Declare Version:0.006000 -Release:1%{?dist} +Release:2%{?dist} Summary:Adding keywords to perl, in perl License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Devel-Declare/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/F/FL/FLORA/Devel-Declare-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: perl = 1:5.8.1 # for test - not yet in fedora # BuildRequires: perl(B::Compiling) BuildRequires: perl(B::Hooks::EndOfScope) = 0.05 @@ -35,8 +33,6 @@ take over Perl's parser, allowing the cr make %{?_smp_mflags} %install -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; @@ -48,9 +44,6 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exe %check make test -%clean -rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README @@ -59,5 +52,8 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %{_mandir}/man3/* %changelog +* Sat Jul 17 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.006000-2 +- cleanup spec for modern rpmbuild + * Sat Jul 03 2010 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 0.006000-1 - Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.78. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel