Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14
Here are the latest results of our python-2.7-rebuilds. http://oget.fedorapeople.org/python27/python-27-rebuild-errors-20100731-1.html Build failed in root.log: 25 packages Build failed in build.log: 38 packages Build succeeded, but may depend on old python (please check): 45 packages --- Total : 108 packages Help from provenpackagers is appreciated. Thanks, Orcan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:21 AM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: As opposed to leaving off a ; which NEVER happens. I never happens.. if you always use left handed emoticons -; -jef -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
Hi Mike, On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org. -Mike when running the command I get permission denied errors. do you need to belong to another group to be able to create a repo? Gerard Creating repo directory structure Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/i386 Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/x86_64 Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/SRPMS Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/i386 Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/x86_64 Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/SRPMS Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied Some repos could not be created. They means your new repos may not work. -- Gerard Braad — 吉拉德 Project-lead Fedora-MIPS http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:gbraad -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:04:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath wrote: MM I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org. MM Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central MM location to store packages that users might find interesting. Ah OK this explains the error message of spots chromium repo... Thx Stefan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:04:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath wrote: MM MM http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople_Repos http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/ There is one repo called bioinfornatics, I am pretty sure it should be bioinformatics Stefan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:11:57 +0200, Stefan wrote: On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:04:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath wrote: MM MM http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople_Repos http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/ There is one repo called bioinfornatics, I am pretty sure it should be bioinformatics And still you're mistaken: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/bioinfornatics ;) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org. Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central location to store packages that users might find interesting. It's still a bit manual (but coprs should fix that). When the time comes we'll be able to properly mirror or move this if we need to (I do still have some performance questions) but since we've never done anything like this before it's hard to determine demand. Enjoy: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople_Repos What about signing the packages? Should they just be unsigned or should every repo provide its own key? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:21:10 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote: MS There is one repo called bioinfornatics, I am pretty sure it MS should be bioinformatics MS MS And still you're mistaken: MS https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/bioinfornatics MS MS ;) Oh gosh pardon me I was not prepared for that one sorry bioinfornatics, ;-) Stefan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg
Dear all, I tried to make a chain build today: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts? Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg
2010/7/31 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com: Dear all, I tried to make a chain build today: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts? Julian -- Do you already push changes to the remote git repo? Try 'git status' Chen Lei -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg
W dniu 31.07.2010 10:03, Chen Lei pisze: 2010/7/31 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com: Dear all, I tried to make a chain build today: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts? Julian -- Do you already push changes to the remote git repo? Try 'git status' Chen Lei Yes, changes were pushed. Even if they weren't, I guess 0.8.7-1 should be picked, right? Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote: Hello, all: This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have to do for this? Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14? | qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer of it either. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
fre 2010-07-30 klockan 16:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath: I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org. Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central location to store packages that users might find interesting. Cool! Clicking on -release rpms in the browser is probably the most convenient way for users to add repos. (Should it be convenient?) This script can be used to generate them: http://abo.fedorapeople.org/tmp/fedorapeople-repo-releaserpm.sh The third argument Fedora release number would be the oldest release you intend to support in the repo as it will require system-release = N. The included .repo file is independent of the release. /Alexander -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 07/31/2010 05:44 PM +9:00: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote: Hello, all: This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have to do for this? Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14? | qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer of it either. I guess because you built it (that EVR). Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: The move to git!
Hi all, I do not know anything about GIT and I tried to follow this thread and the Using_Fedora_GIT in the wiki to make my first commit The workflow was more or less the following: $ fedpkg clone zaz $ cd zaz/ $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 . $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/zaz.spec . $ fedpkg new-sources zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 $ git diff $ git config --global --add push.default tracking $ fedpkg clog $ fedpkg commit -F clog -p I tried to use federa-packager available from updates. fedpkg commit -F clog -p did not succeed. Then I installed the latest federa-packager from updates-testing and fedpkg commit -F clog -p now crashes. It even crashes with fedpkg clog. The error is the same. $ fedpkg clog Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module args.command(args) File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 390, in clog mymodule = pyfedpkg.PackageModule(args.path) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 744, in __init__ self.distval = self._findmasterbranch() File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 694, in _findmasterbranch return(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1) IndexError: list index out of range Help is really appreciated. Thanks! Andrea. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: The move to git!
On 07/31/2010 03:19 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: lreturn(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1) IndexError: list index out of range Help is really appreciated. Thanks! make sure you update fedora-packager to 0.5.1, remove and clone the repo again and follow the same steps. It will work. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: The move to git!
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote: On 07/31/2010 03:19 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: l return(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1) IndexError: list index out of range Help is really appreciated. Thanks! make sure you update fedora-packager to 0.5.1, remove and clone the repo again and follow the same steps. It will work. OK. I deleted the current repo and started again. I do have fedora-packager 0.5.1. Now fedora-packager crashes when uploading new sources. $ fedpkg clone zaz Cloning into zaz... [..] Resolving deltas: 100% (11/11), done. $ cd zaz/ $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 . $ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/zaz.spec . $ fedpkg new-sources zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 Uploading: 6a63f986a80b4f4e1852ecf9871e9735 zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module args.command(args) File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 540, in new_sources mymodule.upload(args.files, replace=args.replace) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 1278, in upload if lookaside.file_exists(self.module, file_basename, file_hash): File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 580, in file_exists curl.perform() pycurl.error: (35, 'SSL connect error') [and...@panoramix zaz]$ Regards, Andrea. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
Hi. On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:48:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote I got some info from McGrath and added it to the wiki. I don't think it's a good idea to save informations that are used to authenticate a connection in a wiki. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: repos.fedorapeople.org
Sorry, it was owned by packagers, I've changed that. -Mike On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Gerard Braad wrote: Hi Mike, On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org. -Mike when running the command I get permission denied errors. do you need to belong to another group to be able to create a repo? Gerard Creating repo directory structure Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/i386 Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/x86_64 Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/SRPMS Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/i386 Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/x86_64 Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/SRPMS Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied Some repos could not be created. They means your new repos may not work. -- Gerard Braad — 吉拉德 Project-lead Fedora-MIPS http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:gbraad -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Issue checking out
Hello I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS a couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors. [ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 812, in module args.command(args) File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 408, in clone pyfedpkg.clone(args.module[0], args.user, args.path, args.branch) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 170, in clone raise FedpkgError('Could not clone %s: %s' % (giturl, e)) pyfedpkg.FedpkgError: Could not clone ssh:// mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c: 'git clone ssh:// mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c' returned exit status 128: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/local/bin/gl-auth-command line 65. R access for frama-c DENIED to mrader fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Does anyone have an idea what is causing this? Mark Rader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Issue checking out
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mark Rader wrote: Hello I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS a couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors. [ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 812, in module args.command(args) File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 408, in clone pyfedpkg.clone(args.module[0], args.user, args.path, args.branch) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 170, in clone raise FedpkgError('Could not clone %s: %s' % (giturl, e)) pyfedpkg.FedpkgError: Could not clone ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c: 'git clone ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c' returned exit status 128: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/local/bin/gl-auth-command line 65. R access for frama-c DENIED to mrader fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Does anyone have an idea what is causing this? You need the newer version of fedora-packager. Note your connect string is pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org the newer version will have you hitting pkgs.fedoraproject.org - Mike-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Issue checking out
Am Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:37:19 -0500 schrieb Mark Rader msra...@gmail.com: Hello I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS a couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors. [ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 812, in module args.command(args) File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 408, in clone pyfedpkg.clone(args.module[0], args.user, args.path, args.branch) File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 170, in clone raise FedpkgError('Could not clone %s: %s' % (giturl, e)) pyfedpkg.FedpkgError: Could not clone ssh:// mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c: 'git clone ssh:// mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c' returned exit status 128: Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/local/bin/gl-auth-command line 65. R access for frama-c DENIED to mrader fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Does anyone have an idea what is causing this? You have a wrong version of fedora-packager. Your repo is not at pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c it's at: pkgs.fedoraproject.org/frama-c Grab the latest version from koji and it will work for you: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=186865 Thomas -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:45:13 +0200, Ralf Ertzinger fed...@camperquake.de wrote: Hi. On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:48:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote I got some info from McGrath and added it to the wiki. I don't think it's a good idea to save informations that are used to authenticate a connection in a wiki. The fingerprint is there, where to look for the public key info or how to use a dns check is. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Issue checking out
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 15:29, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: You need the newer version of fedora-packager. Note your connect string is pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org the newer version will have you hitting pkgs.fedoraproject.org it might be good to put something about this on the wiki. I also had the problem. Christof -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Need help for review Tango for D Programming Feature
hello, I works all days on D Programming Feature. * ldc package is done * but not tango, link: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069 This package need a review i need help for finish this. Thanks for any help best regards -- Jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:30:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote: Michael Schwendt wrote, at 07/31/2010 05:44 PM +9:00: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote: Hello, all: This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have to do for this? Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14? | qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer of it either. I guess because you built it (that EVR). Fascinating. A build from end of 2009. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Config-Model
perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree: On x86_64: perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) = 0:0.303 On i386: perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) = 0:0.303 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
fedoraproject.org certificate has expired
Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun already ... My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET, ie about three hours ago. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote: Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun already ... My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET, ie about three hours ago. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-July/002844.html should be corrected shortly. -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 11:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun already ... My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET, ie about three hours ago. regards, tom lane It's already being addressed. Thanks for the note. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:08:02 -0400, Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote: Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun already ... My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET, ie about three hours ago. McGrath posted an outage notice on the announce list about this. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/31/2010 01:00 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, I tried to make a chain build today: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts? I have to admit, the chain-build target is really untested. I'll have to look further into what happened here. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxUUWgACgkQ4v2HLvE71NXV2gCglfI8XYSk+8JVhC1wSGk8eE8x d3QAmwfpXFspHE7tn0owcEFRD8kbUAZU =CPRV -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/31/2010 09:38 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: On 07/31/2010 01:00 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote: Dear all, I tried to make a chain build today: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts? I have to admit, the chain-build target is really untested. I'll have to look further into what happened here. Actually I found the bug, and fixed it at least for building from rawhide. It'll be in the next build of fedora-packager. If you really care, you can locally patch /usr/lib/python-2.?/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py with: @@ -359,7 +359,9 @@ def get_latest_commit(module): # This is stupid that I have to use subprocess :/ url = ANONGITURL % {'module': module} - -cmd = ['git', 'ls-remote', url, 'master'] +# This cmd below only works to scratch build rawhide +# We need something better for epel +cmd = ['git', 'ls-remote', url, 'refs/heads/master'] try : proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stderr=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE) - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxUVU8ACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVxKgCfTBlQzkpouEAKZi5beE5Fcyob VDAAnRddHzvfkTgdX/imT0nr/r6VCW8i =dcMm -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/30/2010 07:50 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: Jesse Keating wrote, at 07/31/2010 11:36 AM +9:00: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 7/30/10 7:13 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have to do for this? Yes, you can ignore this. It was my fault. Tomorrow a better compose should go through. Thank you. Now another question for tag issue. Currently how is it going about the inheritance of dist-rawhide tag? About pygtk2 618944 bug I saw Toshio rebuilt pygtk2-0.17.0-7.fc14, however I firstly thought that this new pkg was not rebuild for rawhide yet because: [tasa...@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f14-build pygtk2 Build Tag Built by pygtk2-2.17.0-7.fc14 dist-f14-override toshio [tasa...@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-rawhide pygtk2 Build Tag Built by pygtk2-2.17.0-6.fc14 dist-f14 dmalcolm So I tried to rebuild pygtk2 also on rawhide but it failed with koji's reporting that it already exists. Actually: [tasa...@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f15 pygtk2 Build Tag Built by pygtk2-2.17.0-7.fc15 dist-f15 toshio Regards, Mamoru That's my fault. I forgot to update the dist-rawhide tag. Should be cleared up now. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxUUHIACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVCqgCgojLtZoMyQluk1b3dqGkZgnLx yEYAoJlqPpZAp/0KlaaE+MjG7LlTnBN4 =DKl1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07/31/2010 01:44 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote: Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14? Because I'm breaking the inheritance chain now that we've branched, otherwise stable updates from F13/F12 could leak into dist-f14 and bypass bodhi for dist-f14. I had forgotten to add this to my SOP last release which is why we had massively broken deps in the first branched compose. Since I was in a hurry I didn't have time to write a full script that would do the tagging without notification. | qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer of it either. This was answered later in the thread. - -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkxUUNwACgkQ4v2HLvE71NULggCfR6OJxxzRGrkn9BFBGQsEwsS6 /3EAnRESnlge3K1bLl+uHKwcIDwLfK2e =ngGf -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:30 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote: Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun already ... My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET, ie about three hours ago. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-July/002844.html should be corrected shortly. https://lists.fedoraproject.org is not sending the GeoTrust SSL CA intermediate certificate, so it gives an unknown issuer error (unless one happens to already have that intermediate certificate from visiting another site, for clients such as Firefox that cache intermediate certificates). Please fix. -- Matt -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote: On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:30 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote: Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun already ... My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET, ie about three hours ago. http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-July/002844.html should be corrected shortly. https://lists.fedoraproject.org is not sending the GeoTrust SSL CA intermediate certificate, so it gives an unknown issuer error (unless one happens to already have that intermediate certificate from visiting another site, for clients such as Firefox that cache intermediate certificates). Please fix. Fixed -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ACLs working with dist-git?
Hi, I only have commit ACLs on el6 and el5 for python-gdata, but it seems I am able to push to all branches. Is this correct? My username is agoode. Thanks, Adam signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Cannot checkout package
Trying to check out vtk (or other packages): $ fedpkg co vtk Cloning into vtk... Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. open log failed: Permission denied fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone', 'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 128 I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have the latest fedora-package for F13. - Orion -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Cannot checkout package
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote: Trying to check out vtk (or other packages): $ fedpkg co vtk Cloning into vtk... Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. open log failed: Permission denied fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone', 'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 128 I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have the latest fedora-package for F13. Looking now, I can't even get a shell anymore remotely. Console time. -mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Cannot checkout package
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote: Trying to check out vtk (or other packages): $ fedpkg co vtk Cloning into vtk... Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. open log failed: Permission denied fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone', 'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 128 I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have the latest fedora-package for F13. Looking now, I can't even get a shell anymore remotely. Console time. fixed.. looking for a permanent fix now. Basically the logs got rotated, dmaphy was the first one in and the default umask was too restrictive for anyone else to write to the logs. -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Cannot checkout package
I thought I had fixed that. There is a umask in the gitolote.RC that should cover it. And a setgid on the log dir. Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote: On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote: Trying to check out vtk (or other packages): $ fedpkg co vtk Cloning into vtk... Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding. open log failed: Permission denied fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone', 'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 128 I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have the latest fedora-package for F13. Looking now, I can't even get a shell anymore remotely. Console time. fixed.. looking for a permanent fix now. Basically the logs got rotated, dmaphy was the first one in and the default umask was too restrictive for anyone else to write to the logs. -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
modification of sources file causes git corruption.
Check this out.. (00:13:25:da...@gelk:kernel)$ fedpkg -v upload patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 Creating module object from /mnt/data/src/fedora/kernel Uploading: f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 Running curl -k --cert /home/davej/.fedora.cert --fail -o /dev/null --show-error --progress-bar -F name=kernel -F md5sum=f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c -F fi...@patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi directly on the tty 100.0% Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file (00:13:35:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full (00:13:59:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2 1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81 patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2 6488f89f618d7e03af865534b31d3419 patch-2.6.35-rc6-git5.bz2 f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 (00:14:02:da...@gelk:kernel)$ vim sources (00:14:05:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2 1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81 patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2 f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 (00:14:06:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full (00:14:43:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git commit -a [master 89d0d88] 2.6.35-rc6-git6 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (00:16:40:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full dangling blob 64802926167a6aef0d71a5e6de35f0857674947b git show on that blob shows the variant of 'sources' before I removed the git5 entry. It seems if there's a pending staged commit to a file, and then you modify it, git loses its shit. Why can't fedpkg upload just leave the file modified instead of staging the commit ? This would also have the advantage of showing up in git diff without the need for --cached before doing the actual commit. If we're modifying sources for an upload, chances are we're going to want to remove a stale entry anyway, and having to do this as two commits seems a bit dumb. Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: modification of sources file causes git corruption.
No reason really. Just didnt have anybody call me on it. I can fix that in the next fedpkg build. -- Jes Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote: Check this out.. (00:13:25:da...@gelk:kernel)$ fedpkg -v upload patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 Creating module object from /mnt/data/src/fedora/kernel Uploading: f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 Running curl -k --cert /home/davej/.fedora.cert --fail -o /dev/null --show-error --progress-bar -F name=kernel -F md5sum=f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c -F fi...@patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi directly on the tty 100.0% Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file (00:13:35:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full (00:13:59:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2 1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81 patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2 6488f89f618d7e03af865534b31d3419 patch-2.6.35-rc6-git5.bz2 f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 (00:14:02:da...@gelk:kernel)$ vim sources (00:14:05:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2 1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81 patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2 f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 (00:14:06:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full (00:14:43:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git commit -a [master 89d0d88] 2.6.35-rc6-git6 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (00:16:40:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full dangling blob 64802926167a6aef0d71a5e6de35f0857674947b git show on that blob shows the variant of 'sources' before I removed the git5 entry. It seems if there's a pending staged commit to a file, and then you modify it, git loses its shit. Why can't fedpkg upload just leave the file modified instead of staging the commit ? This would also have the advantage of showing up in git diff without the need for --cached before doing the actual commit. If we're modifying sources for an upload, chances are we're going to want to remove a stale entry anyway, and having to do this as two commits seems a bit dumb. Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
File MooseX-Declare-0.33.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Declare: 6af7bbdcecd2f4d866cd043e0fb05136 MooseX-Declare-0.33.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Package-DeprecationManager-0.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Package-DeprecationManager: bc1d60d004b8b4d6aa8c11f3c4ccbc5f Package-DeprecationManager-0.04.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) On i386: perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File PPI-1.209.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI: 1211b049bc91c38335a306516b3baac0 PPI-1.209.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File PPI-1.210.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI: 524ee5cee8039313ae5e221ed2ea2f5d PPI-1.210.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File PPI-1.212.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI: 359e0b4afe4021ce4e37e5f8720f7840 PPI-1.212.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File PPI-1.213.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI: aa5eb0a2bdaa87ee37a0c3bc730eef5e PPI-1.213.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Test-Pod-1.44.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Pod: 02380af5539521524d5df17273a57ae7 Test-Pod-1.44.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Pod/f14/master] Update to 1.44
Summary of changes: cb5fa6b... Update to 1.44 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPI] Modernize spec and improved test coverage
commit 29035f87427cfc1d648833051b852cab5ee0c346 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Fri Jul 30 21:23:09 2010 +0100 Modernize spec and improved test coverage - BR: perl(Task::Weaken) and perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) for improved test coverage - Enable AUTOMATED_TESTING - Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT perl-PPI.spec | 27 --- 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec index 3535760..8dc98cb 100644 --- a/perl-PPI.spec +++ b/perl-PPI.spec @@ -1,14 +1,12 @@ Name: perl-PPI Version:1.206 -Release:5%{?dist} +Release:6%{?dist} Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl - Group: Development/Libraries License:GPL+ or Artistic URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPI/ Source0:http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/PPI-%{version}.tar.gz BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) - BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) # Perl core modules @@ -22,12 +20,13 @@ BuildRequires: perl(File::Remove) = 1.42 BuildRequires: perl(IO::String) = 1.07 BuildRequires: perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.16 BuildRequires: perl(Params::Util) = 1.00 +BuildRequires: perl(Task::Weaken) BuildRequires: perl(Test::ClassAPI) = 1.04 -BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Object) = 0.07 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00 BuildRequires: perl(Test::SubCalls) = 1.07 -BuildRequires: perl(Task::Weaken) Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) %description @@ -36,7 +35,6 @@ Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl (without perl). %prep %setup -q -n PPI-%{version} - %{?filter_setup: %filter_from_provides /^perl(PPI::.*)$/d %?perl_default_filter @@ -45,6 +43,7 @@ iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8 Changes Changes.1 mv Changes.1 Changes chmod -c 644 lib/PPI/Document/File.pm + %build %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make %{?_smp_mflags} @@ -52,14 +51,14 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT +make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';' -chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %check -make test +make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1 %clean @@ -69,11 +68,17 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files %defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes LICENSE README inline2test.conf inline2test.tpl -%{perl_vendorlib}/PPI* -%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm* +%{perl_vendorlib}/PPI/ +%{perl_vendorlib}/PPI.pm +%{_mandir}/man3/PPI*.3pm* %changelog +* Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.206-6 +- BR: perl(Task::Weaken) and perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) for improved test coverage +- enable AUTOMATED_TESTING +- use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT + * Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.206-5 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPI] Update to 1.208
commit 552034513165a9bb7a7cda113833b02eac5f7ca2 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Fri Jul 30 21:32:45 2010 +0100 Update to 1.208 - This is a general bug fix and accuracy release: - don't assign '' to $^W, it generates a warning on Gentoo - added missing PPI::Token::Regexp fix to Changes file - updating Copyright to the new year - fixed #50309: literal() wrong result on qw (a b c) - PPI::Dumper no longer causes Elements to flush location data - PPI::Dumper no longer disables location information for non-Documents - +{ package = 1 } doesn't create a PPI::Statement::Package - extra methods in PPI::Token::Regexp and PPI::Token::QuoteLike::Regexp - use %{_fixperms} macro instead of our own chmod incantation .gitignore|2 +- perl-PPI.spec | 18 +++--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 521589f..63cb017 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1 @@ -PPI-1.206.tar.gz +PPI-1.208.tar.gz diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec index 8dc98cb..f689e9d 100644 --- a/perl-PPI.spec +++ b/perl-PPI.spec @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ Name: perl-PPI -Version:1.206 -Release:6%{?dist} +Version:1.208 +Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl Group: Development/Libraries License:GPL+ or Artistic @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';' find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';' -chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %check @@ -74,6 +74,18 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.208-1 +- update to 1.208 + - don't assign '' to $^W, it generates a warning on Gentoo + - added missing PPI::Token::Regexp fix to Changes file + - updating Copyright to the new year + - fixed #50309: literal() wrong result on qw (a b c) + - PPI::Dumper no longer causes Elements to flush location data + - PPI::Dumper no longer disables location information for non-Documents + - +{ package = 1 } doesn't create a PPI::Statement::Package + - extra methods in PPI::Token::Regexp and PPI::Token::QuoteLike::Regexp +- use %%{_fixperms} macro instead of our own chmod incantation + * Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.206-6 - BR: perl(Task::Weaken) and perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) for improved test coverage - enable AUTOMATED_TESTING diff --git a/sources b/sources index f9f50e8..a765a63 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -82b1bd95be146fc742bcfdf067715650 PPI-1.206.tar.gz +d8b870c4dac08a901424220b1e9a9b7f PPI-1.208.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPI] Update to 1.209
commit 19fa416e6b8252ab44d0734238eb6a335e1e5d62 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Sat Jul 31 11:03:08 2010 +0100 Update to 1.209 - Small optimisation release: - No functional changes - Upgrading to Module::Install 0.92 - Moved the Test::ClassAPI test to only run during RELEASE_TESTING to reduce the dependency load (and occasionally Test::ClassAPI seems to FAIL on CPAN Testers) .gitignore|2 +- perl-PPI.spec |5 - sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 63cb017..62d9cae 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1 @@ -PPI-1.208.tar.gz +PPI-1.209.tar.gz diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec index f689e9d..fd78902 100644 --- a/perl-PPI.spec +++ b/perl-PPI.spec @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Name: perl-PPI -Version:1.208 +Version:1.209 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl Group: Development/Libraries @@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.209-1 +- update to 1.209 (small optimisation release, no functional changes) + * Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.208-1 - update to 1.208 - don't assign '' to $^W, it generates a warning on Gentoo diff --git a/sources b/sources index a765a63..cecfff8 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -d8b870c4dac08a901424220b1e9a9b7f PPI-1.208.tar.gz +1211b049bc91c38335a306516b3baac0 PPI-1.209.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPI] Update to 1.210
commit 54bb97dfa09bff7b5459081c2f943937e024467e Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Sat Jul 31 14:31:16 2010 +0100 Update to 1.210 - Packaging fix release: - No functional changes - Upgrading to Module::Install 0.93 - Added missing test_requires dependency for Class::Inspector - Use RELEASE_TESTING rather than AUTOMATED_TESTING for better test coverage .gitignore|2 +- perl-PPI.spec |8 ++-- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 62d9cae..ecfe64a 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1 @@ -PPI-1.209.tar.gz +PPI-1.210.tar.gz diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec index fd78902..cf1fa1b 100644 --- a/perl-PPI.spec +++ b/perl-PPI.spec @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Name: perl-PPI -Version:1.209 +Version:1.210 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl Group: Development/Libraries @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';' %check -make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1 +make test RELEASE_TESTING=1 %clean @@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.210-1 +- update to 1.210 (packaging fixes) +- use RELEASE_TESTING rather than AUTOMATED_TESTING for better test coverage + * Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.209-1 - update to 1.209 (small optimisation release, no functional changes) diff --git a/sources b/sources index cecfff8..633d9cf 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -1211b049bc91c38335a306516b3baac0 PPI-1.209.tar.gz +524ee5cee8039313ae5e221ed2ea2f5d PPI-1.210.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPI] Update to 1.212
commit cd85bb8e32f77b1a80368942631da38fac902714 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Sat Jul 31 15:21:18 2010 +0100 Update to 1.212 - Experimental/development support and bugfix release: - Fixed bug in ForLoop back-compatibility warning (CPAN RT#48819) - Added support for $ENV{X_TOKENIZER} -- $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER - Upgraded to Module::Install 0.93 - Added support for $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER, so that alternate experimental tokenizers can be swapped in for testing - Added an extra 14_charsets.t case to validate we handle byte order marks properly - Moved author tests from t to xt to reduce spurious test failures in CPAN Testers, when the testing modules change across versions - Fixed #26082: scalar { %x } is misparsed - Fixed #26591: VMS patch for PPI 1.118 - Fixed #44862: PPI cannot parse package Foo::100; correctly - Fixed #54208: PPI::Token::Quote::Literal::literal is missing due to case-sensitivity error - Run release tests as well as regular test suite - BR: perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.32, perl(File::Find::Rule::Perl) = 1.09, perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24 and perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 0.101080 for release tests .gitignore|2 +- perl-PPI.spec | 28 +--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index ecfe64a..4f80ad6 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1 @@ -PPI-1.210.tar.gz +PPI-1.212.tar.gz diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec index cf1fa1b..5a7e2e6 100644 --- a/perl-PPI.spec +++ b/perl-PPI.spec @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Name: perl-PPI -Version:1.210 +Version:1.212 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl Group: Development/Libraries @@ -16,15 +16,19 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.86 BuildRequires: perl(Digest::MD5) = 2.35 # CPAN modules BuildRequires: perl(Clone) = 0.30 +BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.32 +BuildRequires: perl(File::Find::Rule::Perl) = 1.09 BuildRequires: perl(File::Remove) = 1.42 BuildRequires: perl(IO::String) = 1.07 BuildRequires: perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.16 BuildRequires: perl(Params::Util) = 1.00 +BuildRequires: perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24 BuildRequires: perl(Task::Weaken) BuildRequires: perl(Test::ClassAPI) = 1.04 BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) -BuildRequires: perl(Test::Object) = 0.07 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 0.101080 BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Object) = 0.07 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00 BuildRequires: perl(Test::SubCalls) = 1.07 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) @@ -58,7 +62,8 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';' %check -make test RELEASE_TESTING=1 +make test +make test TEST_FILES=xt/*.t RELEASE_TESTING=1 %clean @@ -74,6 +79,23 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.212-1 +- update to 1.212 (experimental/development support and bugfixes) + - Fixed bug in ForLoop back-compatibility warning (CPAN RT#48819) + - Added support for $ENV{X_TOKENIZER} -- $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER + - Upgraded to Module::Install 0.93 + - Added support for $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER, for alternate tokenizers + - Added an extra test case to validate we handle byte order marks properly + - Moved author tests from t to xt + - Fixed CPAN RT#26082: scalar { %%x } is misparsed + - Fixed CPAN RT#26591: VMS patch for PPI 1.118 + - Fixed CPAN RT#44862: PPI cannot parse package Foo::100; correctly + - Fixed CPAN RT#54208: PPI::Token::Quote::Literal::literal missing +- run release tests as well as regular test suite +- BR: perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.32, perl(File::Find::Rule::Perl) = 1.09, + perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24 and perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 0.101080 + for release tests + * Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.210-1 - update to 1.210 (packaging fixes) - use RELEASE_TESTING rather than AUTOMATED_TESTING for better test coverage diff --git a/sources b/sources index 633d9cf..356dd74 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -524ee5cee8039313ae5e221ed2ea2f5d PPI-1.210.tar.gz +359e0b4afe4021ce4e37e5f8720f7840 PPI-1.212.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-PPI] Update to 1.213
commit fcd2e65f377e7867e063aca6eaeae8904724fd23 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Sat Jul 31 17:02:18 2010 +0100 Update to 1.213 - Targeted bug fix release, no changes to parsing or normal usage: - Updated to Module::Install 1.00 - Updated module dependencies in xt author tests - Fixed extremely broken PPI::Token::Pod::merge and added test case - Bump perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) requirement to 1.25 - Bump perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) requirement to 0.17 - Bump perl(Test::Pod) requirement to 1.44 .gitignore|2 +- perl-PPI.spec | 17 + sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 4f80ad6..5f77400 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1 @@ -PPI-1.212.tar.gz +PPI-1.213.tar.gz diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec index 5a7e2e6..d68f58f 100644 --- a/perl-PPI.spec +++ b/perl-PPI.spec @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ Name: perl-PPI -Version:1.212 +Version:1.213 Release:1%{?dist} Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl Group: Development/Libraries @@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ BuildRequires: perl(File::Remove) = 1.42 BuildRequires: perl(IO::String) = 1.07 BuildRequires: perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.16 BuildRequires: perl(Params::Util) = 1.00 -BuildRequires: perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24 +BuildRequires: perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.25 BuildRequires: perl(Task::Weaken) BuildRequires: perl(Test::ClassAPI) = 1.04 -BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) +BuildRequires: perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) = 0.17 BuildRequires: perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 0.101080 BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084 BuildRequires: perl(Test::Object) = 0.07 -BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.44 BuildRequires: perl(Test::SubCalls) = 1.07 Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) @@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %changelog +* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.213-1 +- update to 1.213 (targeted bug fix, no changes to parsing or normal usage) + - Updated to Module::Install 1.00 + - Updated module dependencies in xt author tests + - Fixed extremely broken PPI::Token::Pod::merge and added test case +- bump perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) requirement to 1.25 +- bump perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) requirement to 0.17 +- bump perl(Test::Pod) requirement to 1.44 + * Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.212-1 - update to 1.212 (experimental/development support and bugfixes) - Fixed bug in ForLoop back-compatibility warning (CPAN RT#48819) diff --git a/sources b/sources index 356dd74..96f62df 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -359e0b4afe4021ce4e37e5f8720f7840 PPI-1.212.tar.gz +aa5eb0a2bdaa87ee37a0c3bc730eef5e PPI-1.213.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[pkgdb] perl-DBI-Dumper had acl change status
cweyl has set the approveacls acl on perl-DBI-Dumper (Fedora devel) to Approved for perl-sig To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-DBI-Dumper -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[pkgdb] perl-DBI-Dumper had acl change status
cweyl has set the commit acl on perl-DBI-Dumper (Fedora devel) to Obsolete for perl-sig To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-DBI-Dumper -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[pkgdb] perl-DBI-Dumper had acl change status
cweyl has set the approveacls acl on perl-DBI-Dumper (Fedora devel) to Obsolete for perl-sig To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-DBI-Dumper -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel