Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

2010-07-31 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
Here are the latest results of our python-2.7-rebuilds.
http://oget.fedorapeople.org/python27/python-27-rebuild-errors-20100731-1.html

Build failed in root.log: 25 packages
Build failed in build.log: 38 packages
Build succeeded, but may depend on old python (please check): 45 packages
---
Total : 108 packages

Help from provenpackagers is appreciated.
Thanks,
Orcan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Python 2.7 status: python2.7 is in dist-f14

2010-07-31 Thread Jeff Spaleta
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:21 AM, seth vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
 As opposed to leaving off a ; which NEVER happens.

I never happens.. if you always use left handed emoticons  -;

-jef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread Gerard Braad
Hi Mike,

On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
 I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
        -Mike

when running the command I get permission denied errors. do you need
to belong to another group to be able to create a repo?


Gerard


Creating repo directory structure

 Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/i386
 Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied
 Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/x86_64
 Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied
 Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/SRPMS
 Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied
 Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/i386
 Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied
 Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/x86_64
 Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied
 Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/SRPMS
 Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied
Some repos could not be created.  They means your new repos may
not work.


-- 
Gerard Braad — 吉拉德
   Project-lead Fedora-MIPS
   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:gbraad
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread Stefan Grosse
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:04:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath wrote:

MM I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
MM Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central
MM location to store packages that users might find interesting.

Ah OK this explains the error message of spots chromium repo...

Thx
Stefan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread Stefan Grosse
On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:04:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath wrote:

MM 
MM http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople_Repos

http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/

There is one repo called bioinfornatics, I am pretty sure it should be
bioinformatics

Stefan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:11:57 +0200, Stefan wrote:

 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:04:20 -0500 (CDT) Mike McGrath wrote:
 
 MM 
 MM http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople_Repos
 
 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/
 
 There is one repo called bioinfornatics, I am pretty sure it should be
 bioinformatics

And still you're mistaken:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/bioinfornatics

;)
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread drago01
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
 I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
 Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central location
 to store packages that users might find interesting.

 It's still a bit manual (but coprs should fix that).  When the time comes
 we'll be able to properly mirror or move this if we need to (I do still
 have some performance questions) but since we've never done anything like
 this before it's hard to determine demand.

 Enjoy:

 http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedorapeople_Repos

What about signing the packages?
Should they just be unsigned or should every repo provide its own key?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread Stefan Grosse
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 09:21:10 +0200 Michael Schwendt wrote:

MS  There is one repo called bioinfornatics, I am pretty sure it
MS  should be bioinformatics
MS 
MS And still you're mistaken:
MS https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/bioinfornatics
MS 
MS ;)

Oh gosh pardon me I was not prepared for that one
sorry bioinfornatics,
;-)
Stefan
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg

2010-07-31 Thread Julian Sikorski
Dear all,

I tried to make a chain build today:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385
For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the
proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts?

Julian

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg

2010-07-31 Thread Chen Lei
2010/7/31 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com:
 Dear all,

 I tried to make a chain build today:
 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385
 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the
 proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts?

 Julian

 --

Do you already push changes to the remote git repo?

Try 'git status'


Chen Lei
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg

2010-07-31 Thread Julian Sikorski
W dniu 31.07.2010 10:03, Chen Lei pisze:
 2010/7/31 Julian Sikorski beleg...@gmail.com:
 Dear all,

 I tried to make a chain build today:
 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385
 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the
 proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts?

 Julian

 --
 
 Do you already push changes to the remote git repo?
 
 Try 'git status'
 
 
 Chen Lei
Yes, changes were pushed. Even if they weren't, I guess 0.8.7-1 should
be picked, right?

Julian

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

2010-07-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote:

 Hello, all:
 
 This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
 massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
 I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have
 to do for this?

Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14?

| qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating

I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer
of it either.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread Alexander Boström
fre 2010-07-30 klockan 16:04 -0500 skrev Mike McGrath:
 I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
 Intended for non-transient package hosting, it's a good central location
 to store packages that users might find interesting.

Cool!

Clicking on -release rpms in the browser is probably the most convenient
way for users to add repos. (Should it be convenient?)

This script can be used to generate them:
http://abo.fedorapeople.org/tmp/fedorapeople-repo-releaserpm.sh
The third argument Fedora release number would be the oldest release
you intend to support in the repo as it will require system-release =
N. The included .repo file is independent of the release.

/Alexander


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

2010-07-31 Thread Mamoru Tasaka
Michael Schwendt wrote, at 07/31/2010 05:44 PM +9:00:
 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote:

 Hello, all:

 This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
 massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
 I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have
 to do for this?

 Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14?

 | qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating

 I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer
 of it either.

I guess because you built it (that EVR).

Mamoru
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: The move to git!

2010-07-31 Thread Andrea Musuruane
Hi all,
I do not know anything about GIT and I tried to follow this thread
and the Using_Fedora_GIT in the wiki to make my first commit

The workflow was more or less the following:
$ fedpkg clone zaz
$ cd zaz/
$ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 .
$ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/zaz.spec .
$ fedpkg new-sources zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2
$ git diff
$ git config --global --add push.default tracking
$ fedpkg clog
$ fedpkg commit -F clog -p

I tried to use federa-packager available from updates. fedpkg commit
-F clog -p did not succeed.

Then I installed the latest federa-packager from updates-testing and
fedpkg commit -F clog -p now crashes. It even crashes with fedpkg
clog. The error is the same.

$ fedpkg clog
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module
args.command(args)
  File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 390, in clog
mymodule = pyfedpkg.PackageModule(args.path)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line
744, in __init__
self.distval = self._findmasterbranch()
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line
694, in _findmasterbranch
return(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1)
IndexError: list index out of range

Help is really appreciated.

Thanks!

Andrea.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: The move to git!

2010-07-31 Thread Rahul Sundaram
 On 07/31/2010 03:19 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
 lreturn(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1)
 IndexError: list index out of range

 Help is really appreciated.

 Thanks!

make sure you update fedora-packager to 0.5.1, remove and clone the repo
again and follow the same steps. It will work.

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: The move to git!

2010-07-31 Thread Andrea Musuruane
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Rahul Sundaram methe...@gmail.com wrote:
  On 07/31/2010 03:19 PM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
 l    return(int(fedoras[-1].strip('f')) + 1)
 IndexError: list index out of range

 Help is really appreciated.

 Thanks!

 make sure you update fedora-packager to 0.5.1, remove and clone the repo
 again and follow the same steps. It will work.

OK. I deleted the current repo and started again. I do have
fedora-packager 0.5.1.

Now fedora-packager crashes when uploading new sources.

$ fedpkg clone zaz
Cloning into zaz...
[..]
Resolving deltas: 100% (11/11), done.
$ cd zaz/
$ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SOURCES/zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2 .
$ cp -a ~/rpmbuild/SPECS/zaz.spec .
$ fedpkg new-sources zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2
Uploading: 6a63f986a80b4f4e1852ecf9871e9735  zaz-0.8.0.tar.bz2
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 959, in module
args.command(args)
  File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 540, in new_sources
mymodule.upload(args.files, replace=args.replace)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line
1278, in upload
if lookaside.file_exists(self.module, file_basename, file_hash):
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line
580, in file_exists
curl.perform()
pycurl.error: (35, 'SSL connect error')
[and...@panoramix zaz]$

Regards,

Andrea.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-31 Thread Ralf Ertzinger
Hi.

On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:48:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote

 I got some info from McGrath and added it to the wiki.

I don't think it's a good idea to save informations that are used
to authenticate a connection in a wiki.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: repos.fedorapeople.org

2010-07-31 Thread Mike McGrath
Sorry, it was owned by packagers, I've changed that.

-Mike


On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Gerard Braad wrote:

 Hi Mike,

 On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 5:04 AM, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
  I'm happy to announce the availability of repos.fedorapeople.org.
         -Mike

 when running the command I get permission denied errors. do you need
 to belong to another group to be able to create a repo?


 Gerard


 Creating repo directory structure

  Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/i386
  Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied
  Creating 
 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/x86_64
  Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied
  Creating 
 http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/fedora-13/SRPMS
  Could not create fedora-13 - Permission denied
  Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/i386
  Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied
  Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/x86_64
  Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied
  Creating http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/gbraad/freeswitch/epel-5/SRPMS
  Could not create epel-5 - Permission denied
 Some repos could not be created.  They means your new repos may
 not work.


 --
 Gerard Braad — 吉拉德
    Project-lead Fedora-MIPS
    http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:gbraad
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Issue checking out

2010-07-31 Thread Mark Rader
Hello

I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS a
couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors.

[ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c
Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 812, in module
args.command(args)
  File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 408, in clone
pyfedpkg.clone(args.module[0], args.user, args.path, args.branch)
  File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 170, in
clone
raise FedpkgError('Could not clone %s: %s' % (giturl, e))
pyfedpkg.FedpkgError: Could not clone ssh://
mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c: 'git clone ssh://
mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c' returned exit status 128: Use of
uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/local/bin/gl-auth-command line 65.
R access for frama-c DENIED to mrader
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly

Does anyone have an idea what is causing this?

Mark Rader
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Issue checking out

2010-07-31 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mark Rader wrote:

 Hello

 I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS a 
 couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors. 

 [ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c
 Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 812, in module
     args.command(args)
   File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 408, in clone
     pyfedpkg.clone(args.module[0], args.user, args.path, args.branch)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line 170, in 
 clone
     raise FedpkgError('Could not clone %s: %s' % (giturl, e))
 pyfedpkg.FedpkgError: Could not clone 
 ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c: 'git clone 
 ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c' returned exit status 128:
 Use of uninitialized value in string eq at /usr/local/bin/gl-auth-command 
 line 65.
 R access for frama-c DENIED to mrader
 fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly

 Does anyone have an idea what is causing this?


You need the newer version of fedora-packager.  Note your connect string
is pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org the newer version will have you hitting
pkgs.fedoraproject.org

-   Mike-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Issue checking out

2010-07-31 Thread Thomas Spura
Am Sat, 31 Jul 2010 07:37:19 -0500
schrieb Mark Rader msra...@gmail.com:

 Hello
 
 I am trying to checkout the package I put into the repository via CVS
 a couple of weeks ago, frama-c, and i am getting a couple of errors.
 
 [ra...@tpath3 upload]$ fedpkg -v clone frama-c
 Cloning ssh://mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 812, in module
 args.command(args)
   File /usr/bin/fedpkg, line 408, in clone
 pyfedpkg.clone(args.module[0], args.user, args.path, args.branch)
   File /usr/lib/python2.6/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py, line
 170, in clone
 raise FedpkgError('Could not clone %s: %s' % (giturl, e))
 pyfedpkg.FedpkgError: Could not clone ssh://
 mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c: 'git clone ssh://
 mra...@pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c' returned exit status 128:
 Use of uninitialized value in string eq
 at /usr/local/bin/gl-auth-command line 65. R access for frama-c
 DENIED to mrader fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
 
 Does anyone have an idea what is causing this?

You have a wrong version of fedora-packager.
Your repo is not at pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/frama-c it's at:
pkgs.fedoraproject.org/frama-c

Grab the latest version from koji and it will work for you:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=186865

Thomas
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Fedora 14 branching and dist-git roll out

2010-07-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 12:45:13 +0200,
  Ralf Ertzinger fed...@camperquake.de wrote:
 Hi.
 
 On Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:48:22 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote
 
  I got some info from McGrath and added it to the wiki.
 
 I don't think it's a good idea to save informations that are used
 to authenticate a connection in a wiki.

The fingerprint is there, where to look for the public key info or how to
use a dns check is.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Issue checking out

2010-07-31 Thread Christof Damian
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 15:29, Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:
 You need the newer version of fedora-packager.  Note your connect string
 is pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org the newer version will have you hitting
 pkgs.fedoraproject.org


it might be good to put something about this on the wiki. I also had
the problem.

Christof
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Need help for review Tango for D Programming Feature

2010-07-31 Thread Jonathan MERCIER
hello,
I works all days on D Programming Feature.
* ldc package is done
* but not tango, link:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069
This package need a review i need help for finish this.
Thanks for any help

best regards
-- 
Jonathan MERCIER bioinfornat...@gmail.com

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

2010-07-31 Thread Michael Schwendt
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 18:30:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote:

 Michael Schwendt wrote, at 07/31/2010 05:44 PM +9:00:
  On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote:
 
  Hello, all:
 
  This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
  massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
  I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have
  to do for this?
 
  Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14?
 
  | qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating
 
  I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer
  of it either.
 
 I guess because you built it (that EVR).

Fascinating. A build from end of 2009.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2010-07-31 Thread buildsys


perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2010-07-31 Thread buildsys


perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


Broken dependencies: perl-Config-Model

2010-07-31 Thread buildsys


perl-Config-Model has broken dependencies in the F-14 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) = 
0:0.303
On i386:
perl-Config-Model-1.205-2.fc14.noarch requires perl(YAML::Any) = 
0:0.303
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


fedoraproject.org certificate has expired

2010-07-31 Thread Tom Lane
Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
already ...

My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
ie about three hours ago.

regards, tom lane
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired

2010-07-31 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:

 Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
 already ...

 My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
 an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
 ie about three hours ago.



http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-July/002844.html

should be corrected shortly.

-Mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired

2010-07-31 Thread seth vidal
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 11:08 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
 Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
 already ...
 
 My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
 an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
 ie about three hours ago.
 
   regards, tom lane


It's already being addressed. Thanks for the note.
-sv


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired

2010-07-31 Thread Bruno Wolff III
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 11:08:02 -0400,
  Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
 Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
 already ...
 
 My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
 an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
 ie about three hours ago.

McGrath posted an outage notice on the announce list about this.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg

2010-07-31 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07/31/2010 01:00 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
 Dear all,
 
 I tried to make a chain build today:
 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385
 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the
 proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts?

I have to admit, the chain-build target is really untested.  I'll have
to look further into what happened here.

- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxUUWgACgkQ4v2HLvE71NXV2gCglfI8XYSk+8JVhC1wSGk8eE8x
d3QAmwfpXFspHE7tn0owcEFRD8kbUAZU
=CPRV
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: strange issue with dist-git/fedpkg

2010-07-31 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07/31/2010 09:38 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
 On 07/31/2010 01:00 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
 Dear all,
 
 I tried to make a chain build today:
 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2368385
 For some reason, an ancient release was picked for goffice, and not the
 proper 0.8.8-1. Any thoughts?
 
 I have to admit, the chain-build target is really untested.  I'll have
 to look further into what happened here.
 

Actually I found the bug, and fixed it at least for building from
rawhide.  It'll be in the next build of fedora-packager.

If you really care, you can locally patch
/usr/lib/python-2.?/site-packages/pyfedpkg/__init__.py with:

@@ -359,7 +359,9 @@ def get_latest_commit(module):

 # This is stupid that I have to use subprocess :/
 url = ANONGITURL % {'module': module}
- -cmd = ['git', 'ls-remote', url, 'master']
+# This cmd below only works to scratch build rawhide
+# We need something better for epel
+cmd = ['git', 'ls-remote', url, 'refs/heads/master']
 try :
 proc = subprocess.Popen(cmd, stderr=subprocess.PIPE,
 stdout=subprocess.PIPE)


- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxUVU8ACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVxKgCfTBlQzkpouEAKZi5beE5Fcyob
VDAAnRddHzvfkTgdX/imT0nr/r6VCW8i
=dcMm
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

2010-07-31 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07/30/2010 07:50 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
 Jesse Keating wrote, at 07/31/2010 11:36 AM +9:00:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 7/30/10 7:13 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
 This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received
 massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that
 I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have
 to do for this?


 Yes, you can ignore this.  It was my fault.  Tomorrow a better compose
 should go through.

 
 Thank you.
 
 Now another question for tag issue. Currently how is it going about
 the inheritance of dist-rawhide tag?
 
 About pygtk2 618944 bug I saw Toshio rebuilt pygtk2-0.17.0-7.fc14,
 however I firstly thought that this new pkg was not rebuild for rawhide
 yet because:
 
 [tasa...@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f14-build pygtk2
 Build Tag   Built by
     
 
 pygtk2-2.17.0-7.fc14  dist-f14-override toshio
 [tasa...@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-rawhide pygtk2
 Build Tag   Built by
     
 
 pygtk2-2.17.0-6.fc14  dist-f14  dmalcolm
 
 So I tried to rebuild pygtk2 also on rawhide but it failed with koji's
 reporting that it already exists. Actually:
 [tasa...@localhost ~]$ koji latest-pkg dist-f15 pygtk2
 Build Tag   Built by
     
 
 pygtk2-2.17.0-7.fc15  dist-f15  toshio
 
 Regards,
 Mamoru


That's my fault.  I forgot to update the dist-rawhide tag.  Should be
cleared up now.

- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxUUHIACgkQ4v2HLvE71NVCqgCgojLtZoMyQluk1b3dqGkZgnLx
yEYAoJlqPpZAp/0KlaaE+MjG7LlTnBN4
=DKl1
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

2010-07-31 Thread Jesse Keating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 07/31/2010 01:44 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
 Why did we receive mails about tagging into dist-f14?

Because I'm breaking the inheritance chain now that we've branched,
otherwise stable updates from F13/F12 could leak into dist-f14 and
bypass bodhi for dist-f14.  I had forgotten to add this to my SOP last
release which is why we had massively broken deps in the first branched
compose.  Since I was in a hurry I didn't have time to write a full
script that would do the tagging without notification.

 
 | qosmic-1.4.2-4.fc13 successfully tagged into dist-f14 by jkeating
 
 I'm not subscribed to that package in koji, and I'm not a comaintainer
 of it either.

This was answered later in the thread.


- -- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxUUNwACgkQ4v2HLvE71NULggCfR6OJxxzRGrkn9BFBGQsEwsS6
/3EAnRESnlge3K1bLl+uHKwcIDwLfK2e
=ngGf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired

2010-07-31 Thread Matt McCutchen
On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:30 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
  Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
  already ...
 
  My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
  an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
  ie about three hours ago.
 
 
 
 http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-July/002844.html
 
 should be corrected shortly.

https://lists.fedoraproject.org is not sending the GeoTrust SSL CA
intermediate certificate, so it gives an unknown issuer error (unless
one happens to already have that intermediate certificate from visiting
another site, for clients such as Firefox that cache intermediate
certificates).  Please fix.

-- 
Matt

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: fedoraproject.org certificate has expired

2010-07-31 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Matt McCutchen wrote:

 On Sat, 2010-07-31 at 10:30 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
  On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Tom Lane wrote:
   Just in case you thought we weren't having enough infrastructure fun
   already ...
  
   My web browser is complaining that admin.fedoraproject.org is presenting
   an invalid SSL certificate: it expired July 31, 2010 8:17:52 AM ET,
   ie about three hours ago.
  
 
 
  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2010-July/002844.html
 
  should be corrected shortly.

 https://lists.fedoraproject.org is not sending the GeoTrust SSL CA
 intermediate certificate, so it gives an unknown issuer error (unless
 one happens to already have that intermediate certificate from visiting
 another site, for clients such as Firefox that cache intermediate
 certificates).  Please fix.


Fixed

-Mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


ACLs working with dist-git?

2010-07-31 Thread Adam Goode
Hi,

I only have commit ACLs on el6 and el5 for python-gdata, but it seems I
am able to push to all branches. Is this correct? My username is agoode.


Thanks,

Adam



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Cannot checkout package

2010-07-31 Thread Orion Poplawski
  Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):

$ fedpkg co vtk
Cloning into vtk...
Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
open log failed: Permission denied
fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone', 
'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 128

I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have 
the latest fedora-package for F13.

- Orion

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Cannot checkout package

2010-07-31 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:

   Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):

 $ fedpkg co vtk
 Cloning into vtk...
 Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
 open log failed: Permission denied
 fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
 Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone',
 'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 128

 I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have
 the latest fedora-package for F13.


Looking now, I can't even get a shell anymore remotely.  Console time.

-mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Cannot checkout package

2010-07-31 Thread Mike McGrath
On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:

 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:

Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):
 
  $ fedpkg co vtk
  Cloning into vtk...
  Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
  open log failed: Permission denied
  fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
  Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone',
  'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 128
 
  I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have
  the latest fedora-package for F13.
 

 Looking now, I can't even get a shell anymore remotely.  Console time.


fixed.. looking for a permanent fix now.  Basically the logs got
rotated, dmaphy was the first one in and the default umask was too
restrictive for anyone else to write to the logs.

-Mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Cannot checkout package

2010-07-31 Thread Jesse Keating
I thought I had fixed that. There is a umask in the gitolote.RC that should 
cover it. And a setgid on the log dir. 

Mike McGrath mmcgr...@redhat.com wrote:

On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Mike McGrath wrote:

 On Sat, 31 Jul 2010, Orion Poplawski wrote:

Trying to check out vtk (or other packages):
 
  $ fedpkg co vtk
  Cloning into vtk...
  Warning: No xauth data; using fake authentication data for X11 forwarding.
  open log failed: Permission denied
  fatal: The remote end hung up unexpectedly
  Could not clone: Command '['git', 'clone',
  'ssh://or...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/vtk']' returned non-zero exit status 
  128
 
  I was able to do this earlier today fine with other packages and have
  the latest fedora-package for F13.
 

 Looking now, I can't even get a shell anymore remotely.  Console time.


fixed.. looking for a permanent fix now.  Basically the logs got
rotated, dmaphy was the first one in and the default umask was too
restrictive for anyone else to write to the logs.

   -Mike
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


modification of sources file causes git corruption.

2010-07-31 Thread Dave Jones
Check this out..

(00:13:25:da...@gelk:kernel)$ fedpkg -v upload patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
Creating module object from /mnt/data/src/fedora/kernel
Uploading: f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
Running curl -k --cert /home/davej/.fedora.cert --fail -o /dev/null 
--show-error --progress-bar -F name=kernel -F 
md5sum=f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c -F fi...@patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 
https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi directly on the tty
 100.0%
Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file
(00:13:35:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
(00:13:59:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 
10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad  linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2
1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81  patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2
6488f89f618d7e03af865534b31d3419  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git5.bz2
f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
(00:14:02:da...@gelk:kernel)$ vim sources 
(00:14:05:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 
10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad  linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2
1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81  patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2
f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
(00:14:06:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
(00:14:43:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git commit -a
[master 89d0d88] 2.6.35-rc6-git6
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(00:16:40:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
dangling blob 64802926167a6aef0d71a5e6de35f0857674947b


git show on that blob shows the variant of 'sources' before I removed
the git5 entry. It seems if there's a pending staged commit to a file,
and then you modify it, git loses its shit.

Why can't fedpkg upload just leave the file modified instead of staging the 
commit ?
This would also have the advantage of showing up in git diff without the need
for --cached before doing the actual commit.

If we're modifying sources for an upload, chances are we're going to want to 
remove
a stale entry anyway, and having to do this as two commits seems a bit dumb.

Dave

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: modification of sources file causes git corruption.

2010-07-31 Thread Jesse Keating
No reason really. Just didnt have anybody call me on it. I can fix that in the 
next fedpkg build.

--
Jes

Dave Jones da...@redhat.com wrote:

Check this out..

(00:13:25:da...@gelk:kernel)$ fedpkg -v upload patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
Creating module object from /mnt/data/src/fedora/kernel
Uploading: f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
Running curl -k --cert /home/davej/.fedora.cert --fail -o /dev/null 
--show-error --progress-bar -F name=kernel -F 
md5sum=f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c -F fi...@patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2 
https://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/repo/pkgs/upload.cgi directly on the tty
 100.0%
Source upload succeeded. Don't forget to commit the sources file
(00:13:35:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
(00:13:59:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 
10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad  linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2
1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81  patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2
6488f89f618d7e03af865534b31d3419  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git5.bz2
f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
(00:14:02:da...@gelk:kernel)$ vim sources 
(00:14:05:da...@gelk:kernel)$ cat sources 
10eebcb0178fb4540e2165bfd7efc7ad  linux-2.6.34.tar.bz2
1205481c8d1b5ccecad87840ddaeaf81  patch-2.6.35-rc6.bz2
f73d01927a3150e729b44add5ea4923c  patch-2.6.35-rc6-git6.bz2
(00:14:06:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
(00:14:43:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git commit -a
[master 89d0d88] 2.6.35-rc6-git6
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
(00:16:40:da...@gelk:kernel)$ git fsck --full
dangling blob 64802926167a6aef0d71a5e6de35f0857674947b


git show on that blob shows the variant of 'sources' before I removed
the git5 entry. It seems if there's a pending staged commit to a file,
and then you modify it, git loses its shit.

Why can't fedpkg upload just leave the file modified instead of staging the 
commit ?
This would also have the advantage of showing up in git diff without the need
for --cached before doing the actual commit.

If we're modifying sources for an upload, chances are we're going to want to 
remove
a stale entry anyway, and having to do this as two commits seems a bit dumb.

   Dave

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


File MooseX-Declare-0.33.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by iarnell

2010-07-31 Thread Iain Arnell
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-Declare:

6af7bbdcecd2f4d866cd043e0fb05136  MooseX-Declare-0.33.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File Package-DeprecationManager-0.04.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for 
perl-Package-DeprecationManager:

bc1d60d004b8b4d6aa8c11f3c4ccbc5f  Package-DeprecationManager-0.04.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule

2010-07-31 Thread buildsys


perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires 
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

2010-07-31 Thread buildsys


perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.


--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File PPI-1.209.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI:

1211b049bc91c38335a306516b3baac0  PPI-1.209.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File PPI-1.210.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI:

524ee5cee8039313ae5e221ed2ea2f5d  PPI-1.210.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File PPI-1.212.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI:

359e0b4afe4021ce4e37e5f8720f7840  PPI-1.212.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File PPI-1.213.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-PPI:

aa5eb0a2bdaa87ee37a0c3bc730eef5e  PPI-1.213.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


File Test-Pod-1.44.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Pod:

02380af5539521524d5df17273a57ae7  Test-Pod-1.44.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-Test-Pod/f14/master] Update to 1.44

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
Summary of changes:

  cb5fa6b... Update to 1.44 (*)

(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-PPI] Modernize spec and improved test coverage

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 29035f87427cfc1d648833051b852cab5ee0c346
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Fri Jul 30 21:23:09 2010 +0100

Modernize spec and improved test coverage

- BR: perl(Task::Weaken) and perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) for improved test 
coverage
- Enable AUTOMATED_TESTING
- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT

 perl-PPI.spec |   27 ---
 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec
index 3535760..8dc98cb 100644
--- a/perl-PPI.spec
+++ b/perl-PPI.spec
@@ -1,14 +1,12 @@
 Name:   perl-PPI
 Version:1.206
-Release:5%{?dist}
+Release:6%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl
-
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
 URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/PPI/
 Source0:http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/A/AD/ADAMK/PPI-%{version}.tar.gz
 BuildRoot:  %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
-
 BuildArch:  noarch
 BuildRequires:  perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 # Perl core modules
@@ -22,12 +20,13 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(File::Remove) = 1.42
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::String) = 1.07
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.16
 BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Util) = 1.00
+BuildRequires:  perl(Task::Weaken)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::ClassAPI) = 1.04
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Meta)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Object) = 0.07
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::SubCalls) = 1.07
-BuildRequires:  perl(Task::Weaken)
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 
 %description
@@ -36,7 +35,6 @@ Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl (without perl).
 
 %prep
 %setup -q -n PPI-%{version}
-
 %{?filter_setup:
 %filter_from_provides /^perl(PPI::.*)$/d
 %?perl_default_filter
@@ -45,6 +43,7 @@ iconv -f iso8859-1 -t utf-8  Changes  Changes.1
 mv Changes.1 Changes 
 chmod -c 644 lib/PPI/Document/File.pm
 
+
 %build
 %{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
@@ -52,14 +51,14 @@ make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
 rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
-chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %check
-make test
+make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1
 
 
 %clean
@@ -69,11 +68,17 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 %files
 %defattr(-,root,root,-)
 %doc Changes LICENSE README inline2test.conf inline2test.tpl
-%{perl_vendorlib}/PPI*
-%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm*
+%{perl_vendorlib}/PPI/
+%{perl_vendorlib}/PPI.pm
+%{_mandir}/man3/PPI*.3pm*
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.206-6
+- BR: perl(Task::Weaken) and perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) for improved test coverage
+- enable AUTOMATED_TESTING
+- use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
+
 * Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.206-5
 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0
 
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-PPI] Update to 1.208

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 552034513165a9bb7a7cda113833b02eac5f7ca2
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Fri Jul 30 21:32:45 2010 +0100

Update to 1.208

- This is a general bug fix and accuracy release:
  - don't assign '' to $^W, it generates a warning on Gentoo
  - added missing PPI::Token::Regexp fix to Changes file
  - updating Copyright to the new year
  - fixed #50309: literal() wrong result on qw (a b c)
  - PPI::Dumper no longer causes Elements to flush location data
  - PPI::Dumper no longer disables location information for non-Documents
  - +{ package = 1 } doesn't create a PPI::Statement::Package
  - extra methods in PPI::Token::Regexp and PPI::Token::QuoteLike::Regexp
- use %{_fixperms} macro instead of our own chmod incantation

 .gitignore|2 +-
 perl-PPI.spec |   18 +++---
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 521589f..63cb017 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-PPI-1.206.tar.gz
+PPI-1.208.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec
index 8dc98cb..f689e9d 100644
--- a/perl-PPI.spec
+++ b/perl-PPI.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Name:   perl-PPI
-Version:1.206
-Release:6%{?dist}
+Version:1.208
+Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl
 Group:  Development/Libraries
 License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
 find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null ';'
-chmod -R u+w $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
+%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %check
@@ -74,6 +74,18 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.208-1
+- update to 1.208
+  - don't assign '' to $^W, it generates a warning on Gentoo
+  - added missing PPI::Token::Regexp fix to Changes file
+  - updating Copyright to the new year
+  - fixed #50309: literal() wrong result on qw (a b c)
+  - PPI::Dumper no longer causes Elements to flush location data
+  - PPI::Dumper no longer disables location information for non-Documents
+  - +{ package = 1 } doesn't create a PPI::Statement::Package
+  - extra methods in PPI::Token::Regexp and PPI::Token::QuoteLike::Regexp
+- use %%{_fixperms} macro instead of our own chmod incantation
+
 * Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.206-6
 - BR: perl(Task::Weaken) and perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) for improved test coverage
 - enable AUTOMATED_TESTING
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index f9f50e8..a765a63 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-82b1bd95be146fc742bcfdf067715650  PPI-1.206.tar.gz
+d8b870c4dac08a901424220b1e9a9b7f  PPI-1.208.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-PPI] Update to 1.209

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 19fa416e6b8252ab44d0734238eb6a335e1e5d62
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Sat Jul 31 11:03:08 2010 +0100

Update to 1.209

- Small optimisation release:
  - No functional changes
  - Upgrading to Module::Install 0.92
  - Moved the Test::ClassAPI test to only run during RELEASE_TESTING
to reduce the dependency load (and occasionally Test::ClassAPI seems
to FAIL on CPAN Testers)

 .gitignore|2 +-
 perl-PPI.spec |5 -
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 63cb017..62d9cae 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-PPI-1.208.tar.gz
+PPI-1.209.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec
index f689e9d..fd78902 100644
--- a/perl-PPI.spec
+++ b/perl-PPI.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-PPI
-Version:1.208
+Version:1.209
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.209-1
+- update to 1.209 (small optimisation release, no functional changes)
+
 * Fri Jul 30 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.208-1
 - update to 1.208
   - don't assign '' to $^W, it generates a warning on Gentoo
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index a765a63..cecfff8 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d8b870c4dac08a901424220b1e9a9b7f  PPI-1.208.tar.gz
+1211b049bc91c38335a306516b3baac0  PPI-1.209.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-PPI] Update to 1.210

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit 54bb97dfa09bff7b5459081c2f943937e024467e
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Sat Jul 31 14:31:16 2010 +0100

Update to 1.210

- Packaging fix release:
  - No functional changes
  - Upgrading to Module::Install 0.93
  - Added missing test_requires dependency for Class::Inspector
- Use RELEASE_TESTING rather than AUTOMATED_TESTING for better test coverage

 .gitignore|2 +-
 perl-PPI.spec |8 ++--
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 62d9cae..ecfe64a 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-PPI-1.209.tar.gz
+PPI-1.210.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec
index fd78902..cf1fa1b 100644
--- a/perl-PPI.spec
+++ b/perl-PPI.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-PPI
-Version:1.209
+Version:1.210
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null ';'
 
 
 %check
-make test AUTOMATED_TESTING=1
+make test RELEASE_TESTING=1
 
 
 %clean
@@ -74,6 +74,10 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.210-1
+- update to 1.210 (packaging fixes)
+- use RELEASE_TESTING rather than AUTOMATED_TESTING for better test coverage
+
 * Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.209-1
 - update to 1.209 (small optimisation release, no functional changes)
 
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index cecfff8..633d9cf 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-1211b049bc91c38335a306516b3baac0  PPI-1.209.tar.gz
+524ee5cee8039313ae5e221ed2ea2f5d  PPI-1.210.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-PPI] Update to 1.212

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit cd85bb8e32f77b1a80368942631da38fac902714
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Sat Jul 31 15:21:18 2010 +0100

Update to 1.212

- Experimental/development support and bugfix release:
  - Fixed bug in ForLoop back-compatibility warning (CPAN RT#48819)
  - Added support for $ENV{X_TOKENIZER} -- $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER
  - Upgraded to Module::Install 0.93
  - Added support for $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER, so that alternate 
experimental
tokenizers can be swapped in for testing
  - Added an extra 14_charsets.t case to validate we handle byte order marks
properly
  - Moved author tests from t to xt to reduce spurious test failures in CPAN
Testers, when the testing modules change across versions
  - Fixed #26082: scalar { %x } is misparsed
  - Fixed #26591: VMS patch for PPI 1.118
  - Fixed #44862: PPI cannot parse package Foo::100; correctly
  - Fixed #54208: PPI::Token::Quote::Literal::literal is missing due to
case-sensitivity error
- Run release tests as well as regular test suite
- BR: perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.32, perl(File::Find::Rule::Perl) = 1.09,
  perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24 and perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 
0.101080
  for release tests

 .gitignore|2 +-
 perl-PPI.spec |   28 +---
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index ecfe64a..4f80ad6 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-PPI-1.210.tar.gz
+PPI-1.212.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec
index cf1fa1b..5a7e2e6 100644
--- a/perl-PPI.spec
+++ b/perl-PPI.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-PPI
-Version:1.210
+Version:1.212
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -16,15 +16,19 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(Test::More) = 0.86
 BuildRequires:  perl(Digest::MD5) = 2.35
 # CPAN modules
 BuildRequires:  perl(Clone) = 0.30
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.32
+BuildRequires:  perl(File::Find::Rule::Perl) = 1.09
 BuildRequires:  perl(File::Remove) = 1.42
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::String) = 1.07
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.16
 BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Util) = 1.00
+BuildRequires:  perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24
 BuildRequires:  perl(Task::Weaken)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::ClassAPI) = 1.04
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Meta)
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Object) = 0.07
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 0.101080
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Object) = 0.07
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::SubCalls) = 1.07
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
@@ -58,7 +62,8 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type d -depth -exec rmdir {} 
2/dev/null ';'
 
 
 %check
-make test RELEASE_TESTING=1
+make test
+make test TEST_FILES=xt/*.t RELEASE_TESTING=1
 
 
 %clean
@@ -74,6 +79,23 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.212-1
+- update to 1.212 (experimental/development support and bugfixes)
+  - Fixed bug in ForLoop back-compatibility warning (CPAN RT#48819)
+  - Added support for $ENV{X_TOKENIZER} -- $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER
+  - Upgraded to Module::Install 0.93
+  - Added support for $PPI::Lexer::X_TOKENIZER, for alternate tokenizers
+  - Added an extra test case to validate we handle byte order marks properly
+  - Moved author tests from t to xt
+  - Fixed CPAN RT#26082: scalar { %%x } is misparsed
+  - Fixed CPAN RT#26591: VMS patch for PPI 1.118
+  - Fixed CPAN RT#44862: PPI cannot parse package Foo::100; correctly
+  - Fixed CPAN RT#54208: PPI::Token::Quote::Literal::literal missing
+- run release tests as well as regular test suite
+- BR: perl(File::Find::Rule) = 0.32, perl(File::Find::Rule::Perl) = 1.09, 
+  perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24 and perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 
0.101080 
+  for release tests
+
 * Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.210-1
 - update to 1.210 (packaging fixes)
 - use RELEASE_TESTING rather than AUTOMATED_TESTING for better test coverage
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 633d9cf..356dd74 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-524ee5cee8039313ae5e221ed2ea2f5d  PPI-1.210.tar.gz
+359e0b4afe4021ce4e37e5f8720f7840  PPI-1.212.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[perl-PPI] Update to 1.213

2010-07-31 Thread Paul Howarth
commit fcd2e65f377e7867e063aca6eaeae8904724fd23
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date:   Sat Jul 31 17:02:18 2010 +0100

Update to 1.213

- Targeted bug fix release, no changes to parsing or normal usage:
  - Updated to Module::Install 1.00
  - Updated module dependencies in xt author tests
  - Fixed extremely broken PPI::Token::Pod::merge and added test case
- Bump perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) requirement to 1.25
- Bump perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) requirement to 0.17
- Bump perl(Test::Pod) requirement to 1.44

 .gitignore|2 +-
 perl-PPI.spec |   17 +
 sources   |2 +-
 3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 4f80ad6..5f77400 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1 @@
-PPI-1.212.tar.gz
+PPI-1.213.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-PPI.spec b/perl-PPI.spec
index 5a7e2e6..d68f58f 100644
--- a/perl-PPI.spec
+++ b/perl-PPI.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 Name:   perl-PPI
-Version:1.212
+Version:1.213
 Release:1%{?dist}
 Summary:Parse, Analyze and Manipulate Perl
 Group:  Development/Libraries
@@ -22,14 +22,14 @@ BuildRequires:  perl(File::Remove) = 1.42
 BuildRequires:  perl(IO::String) = 1.07
 BuildRequires:  perl(List::MoreUtils) = 0.16
 BuildRequires:  perl(Params::Util) = 1.00
-BuildRequires:  perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.24
+BuildRequires:  perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) = 1.25
 BuildRequires:  perl(Task::Weaken)
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::ClassAPI) = 1.04
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Meta)
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) = 0.17
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::MinimumVersion) = 0.101080
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::NoWarnings) = 0.084
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Object) = 0.07
-BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.00
+BuildRequires:  perl(Test::Pod) = 1.44
 BuildRequires:  perl(Test::SubCalls) = 1.07
 Requires:   perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo 
$version))
 
@@ -79,6 +79,15 @@ rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
 
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.213-1
+- update to 1.213 (targeted bug fix, no changes to parsing or normal usage)
+  - Updated to Module::Install 1.00
+  - Updated module dependencies in xt author tests
+  - Fixed extremely broken PPI::Token::Pod::merge and added test case
+- bump perl(Perl::MinimumVersion) requirement to 1.25
+- bump perl(Test::CPAN::Meta) requirement to 0.17
+- bump perl(Test::Pod) requirement to 1.44
+
 * Sat Jul 31 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.212-1
 - update to 1.212 (experimental/development support and bugfixes)
   - Fixed bug in ForLoop back-compatibility warning (CPAN RT#48819)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 356dd74..96f62df 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-359e0b4afe4021ce4e37e5f8720f7840  PPI-1.212.tar.gz
+aa5eb0a2bdaa87ee37a0c3bc730eef5e  PPI-1.213.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[pkgdb] perl-DBI-Dumper had acl change status

2010-07-31 Thread Fedora PackageDB
cweyl has set the approveacls acl on perl-DBI-Dumper (Fedora devel) to Approved 
for perl-sig

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-DBI-Dumper
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[pkgdb] perl-DBI-Dumper had acl change status

2010-07-31 Thread Fedora PackageDB
cweyl has set the commit acl on perl-DBI-Dumper (Fedora devel) to Obsolete for 
perl-sig

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-DBI-Dumper
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel


[pkgdb] perl-DBI-Dumper had acl change status

2010-07-31 Thread Fedora PackageDB
cweyl has set the approveacls acl on perl-DBI-Dumper (Fedora devel) to Obsolete 
for perl-sig

To make changes to this package see:
  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/perl-DBI-Dumper
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel