Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes
On Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:37:37 + Rawhide Report wrote: Broken deps for x86_64 -- FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgText.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgSim.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgParticle.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgGA.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgFX.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgDB.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosg.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libOpenThreads.so.11()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosgParticle.so.74 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosgDB.so.74 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosg.so.74 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libOpenThreads.so.11 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgParticle.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgDB.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosg.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libOpenThreads.so.11()(64bit) Some i686 updates make it to the broken deps for x86_64, others don't... Why that? Tom -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
What is Error: Protected multilib versions: ...?
I get this error all the time, but I can't find a coherent explanation for what it means. What is the precise meaning of the protected multilib versions error? # yum install /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [...] Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 != glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64 # yum install /lib/ld-linux.so.2 glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Package glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 already installed and latest version Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package glibc.i686 0:2.14.90-4 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so for package: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so(NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3) for package: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package nss-softokn-freebl.i686 0:3.12.10-4.fc16 will be installed -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 != glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64 # yum install glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Package glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 already installed and latest version Nothing to do Bonus question. How come rpm/yum has allowed me to install multiple different versions of glibc? (I have never knowingly forced any installation on this machine). # rpm -qa | grep glibc glibc-utils-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64 glibc-headers-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-debuginfo-common-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-static-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-debuginfo-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-debuginfo-common-2.14-2.x86_64 glibc-common-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-common-2.14.90-1.x86_64 Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: What is Error: Protected multilib versions: ...?
And now to the list as well... On 4 Sep 2011 10:01, Niels de Vos ni...@nixpanic.net wrote: On 4 Sep 2011 09:45, Richard W.M. Jones rjo...@redhat.com wrote: I get this error all the time, but I can't find a coherent explanation for what it means. What is the precise meaning of the protected multilib versions error? # yum install /lib/ld-linux.so.2 [...] Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 != glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64 # yum install /lib/ld-linux.so.2 glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Package glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 already installed and latest version Resolving Dependencies -- Running transaction check --- Package glibc.i686 0:2.14.90-4 will be installed -- Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so for package: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 -- Processing Dependency: libfreebl3.so(NSSRAWHASH_3.12.3) for package: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 -- Running transaction check --- Package nss-softokn-freebl.i686 0:3.12.10-4.fc16 will be installed -- Finished Dependency Resolution Error: Protected multilib versions: glibc-2.14.90-4.i686 != glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64 # yum install glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 Loaded plugins: auto-update-debuginfo, presto, refresh-packagekit Setting up Install Process Package glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 already installed and latest version Nothing to do Bonus question. How come rpm/yum has allowed me to install multiple different versions of glibc? (I have never knowingly forced any installation on this machine). # rpm -qa | grep glibc glibc-utils-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-2.14.90-1.x86_64 glibc-headers-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-debuginfo-common-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-static-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-debuginfo-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-devel-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-debuginfo-common-2.14-2.x86_64 glibc-common-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-common-2.14.90-1.x86_64 It seems that you have 2x glibc.x86_64, not a 32-bit one. Likely some previous update was interrupted and never finished? yum-complete-transaction or similar might be able to help you here. Hth, Niels Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: What is Error: Protected multilib versions: ...?
Richard W.M. Jones writes: glibc-common-2.14.90-4.x86_64 glibc-common-2.14.90-1.x86_64 This means that rpm/yum aborted in a middle of a upgrade. You should clean this up using rpm -e glibc-common-2.14.90-1.x86_64 pgpf62s8f7GEk.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rawhide report: 20110904 changes
Compose started at Sun Sep 4 08:15:02 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgViewer.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgUtil.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgText.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgSim.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgParticle.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgGA.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgFX.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgDB.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosg.so.74()(64bit) FlightGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libOpenThreads.so.11()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosgParticle.so.74 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosgDB.so.74 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libosg.so.74 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.i686 requires libOpenThreads.so.11 SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgParticle.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosgDB.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libosg.so.74()(64bit) SimGear-2.0.0-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libOpenThreads.so.11()(64bit) acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) awn-extras-applets-0.4.2-0.1.bzr1523.fc16.x86_64 requires libgnome-menu.so.2()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) caribou-0.3.5-1.fc16.i686 requires libgee.so.2 caribou-0.3.5-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libgee.so.2()(64bit) 1:cheese-3.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libgee.so.2()(64bit) 1:cheese-libs-3.0.2-2.fc16.i686 requires libgee.so.2 1:cheese-libs-3.0.2-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libgee.so.2()(64bit) cluster-snmp-0.18.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires rvm-tools coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-18.noarch requires comoonics-base-py comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-24.noarch requires comoonics-base-py contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1 contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.14()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.10()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-applet dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper ease-0.4-7.fc17.i686 requires libgee.so.2 ease-0.4-7.fc17.x86_64 requires libgee.so.2()(64bit) ease-devel-0.4-7.fc17.i686 requires pkgconfig(gee-1.0) ease-devel-0.4-7.fc17.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(gee-1.0) ekiga-3.3.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libpt.so.2.10.1()(64bit) ekiga-3.3.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.28()(64bit) emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-5.fc15.noarch requires gwave emerillon-0.1.2-17.fc16.x86_64 requires libethos-ui-1.0.so.0()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.2-17.fc16.x86_64 requires libethos-1.0.so.0()(64bit) empathy-3.1.90.1-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libgee.so.2()(64bit) fawkes-core-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libopencv_video.so.2.2 fawkes-core-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libopencv_objdetect.so.2.2 fawkes-core-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libopencv_ml.so.2.2 fawkes-core-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libopencv_legacy.so.2.2 fawkes-core-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libopencv_imgproc.so.2.2 fawkes-core-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libopencv_highgui.so.2.2
emacs and libotf.so.0
Hello, I just came onto a tricky dependency issue, and thought it could be of interest to the list. emacs requires libotf.so.0, which is the library handling Open Type Fonts (OTF), provided by the libotf package. Well, fine enough. But libotf.so.0 is also provided by the OpenMPI package (not in /usr/lib, but rather in /usr/lib/openmpi/lib). So, RPM/Yum is misleaded when installing, whenever OpenMPI has installed. It results in a cryptic emacs: error while loading shared libraries: libotf.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory error message (I put it here in plain, so that it can be indexed by our favourite Web crawlers), or so, when trying to launch emacs from a terminal. I see no clean solution, as both packages (libotf, openmpi) have some legitimity to name that libotf.so library like that. And it seems impracticable to have RPM handles full paths rather than just library names. I leave the floor open for debates :) D -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: emacs and libotf.so.0
Hi, On 09/05/2011 12:59 AM, Denis Arnaud wrote: Hello, I just came onto a tricky dependency issue, and thought it could be of interest to the list. emacs requires libotf.so.0, which is the library handling Open Type Fonts (OTF), provided by the libotf package. Well, fine enough. But libotf.so.0 is also provided by the OpenMPI package (not in /usr/lib, but rather in /usr/lib/openmpi/lib). So, RPM/Yum is misleaded when installing, whenever OpenMPI has installed. It results in a cryptic emacs: error while loading shared libraries: libotf.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory error message (I put it here in plain, so that it can be indexed by our favourite Web crawlers), or so, when trying to launch emacs from a terminal. I see no clean solution, as both packages (libotf, openmpi) have some legitimity to name that libotf.so library like that. And it seems impracticable to have RPM handles full paths rather than just library names. I leave the floor open for debates :) I have faced this issue before, and have also raised this on this list, Pls see [1] for the mail thread. [1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-July/153812.html -Amit -- http://echorand.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net writes: the alpha was release and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd is at 0% - why will F16 released WITHOUT making the system clean which should have been done for F15 How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb in the distribution exist until the OS can be called as clean like before F15? The following page appears to have an updated status: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Johannbg/Features/SysVtoSystemd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Review swap request: moonscript, lua-alt-getopt, lua-inotify
I'm ready to swap on any from my packages awaiting review. I going to reviewing now. 24.08.2011 00:58, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: Dear contributors, Is anyone interested in some review swaps? These packages should be quite straightforward: moonscript -- moonscript is to Lua what coffeescript is to Javascript (improved syntax, lots of convenience features -- from for-comprehensions to OOP) You need to recompile lua-filesystem and lua-lpeg from Rawhide, but that should be straightforward. They'll be built for F-16 as well, but we're probably not going to build them for F-15 unless requested https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731003 lua-alt-getopt -- an alternative getopt module, modeled after BSD's getopt_long (needed by moonscript) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731000 lua-inotify -- inotify bindings for Lua (optional requirement for moonscript) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731001 Thanks, -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F-16 Branched report: 20110904 changes
Compose started at Sun Sep 4 13:15:51 UTC 2011 Broken deps for x86_64 -- 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpagent.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmpmibs.so.25()(64bit) 389-ds-base-1.2.9.0-1.fc16.2.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) acheck-0.5.1-4.fc15.noarch requires perl(Text::Aspell) airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires libstdair.so.0.36 airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.i686 requires libstdairuicl.so.0.36 airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libstdairuicl.so.0.36()(64bit) airrac-0.1.0-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libstdair.so.0.36()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.26()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserverui-3.0.so.0()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libecal-1.2.so.9()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.14()(64bit) almanah-0.7.3-12.fc16.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.11()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.3.0-1.fc16.i686 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.14 1:anerley-0.3.0-1.fc16.i686 requires libebook-1.2.so.11 1:anerley-0.3.0-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.11()(64bit) 1:anerley-0.3.0-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.14()(64bit) assogiate-0.2.1-5.fc15.x86_64 requires libgnomevfsmm-2.6.so.1()(64bit) awn-extras-applets-0.4.2-0.1.bzr1523.fc16.x86_64 requires libgnome-menu.so.2()(64bit) bibletime-2.8.1-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libclucene.so.0()(64bit) cluster-snmp-0.18.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires libnetsnmp.so.25()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-backup-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-client-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires rvm-tools coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libseglwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librvmlwp.so.1()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires libse.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librpc2.so.5()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires liblwp.so.2()(64bit) coda-server-6.9.5-6.fc16.x86_64 requires librdslwp.so.1()(64bit) comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-18.noarch requires comoonics-base-py comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-24.noarch requires comoonics-base-py contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1 contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.10()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-applet deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libcamel-1.2.so.23()(64bit) deskbar-applet-2.32.0-4.fc15.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.14()(64bit) dh-make-0.55-3.fc15.noarch requires debhelper emacs-spice-mode-1.2.25-5.fc15.noarch requires gwave emerillon-0.1.2-17.fc16.x86_64 requires libethos-ui-1.0.so.0()(64bit) emerillon-0.1.2-17.fc16.x86_64 requires libethos-1.0.so.0()(64bit) evolution-rss-0.2.90-25.20110716git.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.14()(64bit) evolution-rss-0.2.90-25.20110716git.fc16.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.11()(64bit) exaile-0.3.2.1-1.fc16.noarch requires hal fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgvc.so.5 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libcdt.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.i686 requires libgraph.so.4 fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgvc.so.5()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libcdt.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-guis-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgraph.so.4()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_signals-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.46.1()(64bit) fawkes-plugin-player-0.4.2-4.fc16.x86_64 requires libgeos-3.2.1.so()(64bit) ffgtk-plugin-evolution-0.7.94-5.fc16.x86_64 requires libedataserver-1.2.so.14()(64bit) ffgtk-plugin-evolution-0.7.94-5.fc16.x86_64 requires libebook-1.2.so.11()(64bit) file-browser-applet-0.6.6-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libpanel-applet-2.so.0()(64bit) flaw-1.2.4-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libSDL_gfx.so.0()(64bit) fldigi-3.21.7-1.fc16.x86_64 requires
Re: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SysVtoSystemd
Am 04.09.2011 02:20, schrieb Tom Lane: Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes: Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 07:46, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote: How many releases will this dirty mix of systemd/sysvinit(lsb in the distribution exist until the OS can be called as clean like before F15? As many as it takes to get it done. We need to get a provenpackager to just poke through all the packages and fix them instead of waiting for the maintainers. That doesn't seem to me to be a very good idea. Having recently worked on the systemd migrations for mysql and postgresql, I know that there are frequently package-specific considerations that are not obvious to the casual onlooker. Having somebody who thinks he knows what he's doing hack all the unfixed services is likely to make things worse not better. We should also remove this stupid cannot migrate to a native systemd unit in an update rule. If a native systemd unit file gets written, it should be pushed out to F16 and F15 immediately. That policy annoyed me at first but I've seen the wisdom of it. Doing something like that will very likely break users' customizations of their service setups, which is not something you want to have happen after a routine yum update this wisdom is a little too late and should have been there before forcing the switch - no as we have systemd if we want it or not it must not take years to get all services converted hopefully the next time a big change like i fear wayland will be is introduced this wisdom comes BEFORE release give out a notice or somewaht else if a package brings a new systemd-service but stop tell us we have to wait until F17 or F18 to get the state which should have been for F15 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Non responsive maintainer : gouldwp
Hi, It seems gouldwp is non-responsive. User: gouldwp, Name: None, email: w...@gouldfamily.org, Creation: 2008-01-19, Status: active Approved Groups: cla_fpca cla_fedora fedorabugs cla_done packager Bug (open 2011-08-06, ping 2011-08-25) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=728665 Direct request for co-maintainer via pkgdb without answer Direct email without answer Last build from gouldwp : 2009-11-09 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=591 Without response, I like to take ownership on perl-Net-NBName (required by another package I own) Remi. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: rawhide report: 20110903 changes
On Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:31:21 +0200 Thomas Spura toms...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Some i686 updates make it to the broken deps for x86_64, others don't... Why that? This is multilib. Basically packages that have a -devel subpackage have that devel subpackage and it's requirements (if available) shipped in the 64bit tree. The theory is that this allows people to develop and run 32bit applications if they need on 64bit machines. The 32bit packages in the 64bit repo that don't show up in the report, don't have broken deps. ;) You can see the exact logic used in the 'mash' project: http://git.fedorahosted.org/git/?p=mash;a=blob;f=mash/multilib.py;h=9ae98f0adef296451e0ceffa7589b985d20725af;hb=980e4863b241bcb4bd18e1a82f6256aa1d28b65a If you are wanting to fix issues as a maintainer, http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/MultilibTricks may provide some ideas. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
php-pear package build problem
Hello. I have couple of bugs with FBFS similar to [1]. At first glance it is trivial - php-config doesn't found [2]. But what interesting, it still there as was in Fedora 15: [pasha@vbox temp]$ repoquery --whatprovides '*/php-config' php-devel-0:5.3.6-2.fc15.i686 [pasha@vbox temp]$ repoquery --disablerepo='*' --enablerepo='rawhide' --whatprovides '*/php-config' php-devel-0:5.3.8-1.fc17.i686 And php-devel BR is explicitly mentioned in spec as: BuildRequires: php-devel = 5.1.0 But what very interesting according to root.log [3] it wasn't pulled, and even no error produced? What happened?? 1 - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=715709 2 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3323691name=build.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3323691name=build.log 3 - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3323691name=root.log http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3323691name=root.log -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bundle question
Hello. I'm review jreen library and there found [1] very interesting issue - psi and kdenetwork bundle iris, jdns [2] and simplesasl. For example: $ find kdenetwork-4.6.5 psi-0.14 -iname simplesasl\* kdenetwork-4.6.5/kopete/protocols/jabber/libiris/iris/xmpp/xmpp-core/simplesasl.h kdenetwork-4.6.5/kopete/protocols/jabber/libiris/iris/xmpp/xmpp-core/simplesasl.cpp psi-0.14/iris/src/xmpp/xmpp-core/simplesasl.h psi-0.14/iris/src/xmpp/xmpp-core/simplesasl.cpp Should I fill bugs about it against both? iris (simplesasl its part) is psi [3] library, and as I understand released in it. So I think it may contain it. But how deal with kdenetwork? Patch jreen to use system versions. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries for guidance. 1 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731456#c8 2 http://delta.affinix.com/jdns/ 3 http://psi-im.org/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaned: vpnc
Hi David, On 08/31/2011 09:37 AM, Woodhouse, David wrote: On Wed, 2011-08-31 at 02:42 +0200, Christian Krause wrote: I have looked at the list of open bugs for vpnc and it looks like that there are a couple of packaging issues, some problems with the vpnc-script and some other issues which may require some upstream help. Are there any problems with vpnc-script that *aren't* fixed by simply updating to the one in http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git ? I have looked at the git repository and I'm unsure about one change: The commit: http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/vpnc-scripts.git/commitdiff/ea98b094e8f75fcd696db81bc6c5160dc67b4e4f seems to fix https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693235 (negative MTU) in case ip route ... does not report the mtu. However, at least on my systems, ip route ... does never return the mtu in its output and so the script will always use the hard-coded fallback value 1412 as MTU. The proposed patch attached to the bug report ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=515615 ) uses a different approach: It extracts the actual interface via ip route and retrieves the MTU via ip link show $interface. What do you think about this patch? Best regards, Christian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-Dist-Zilla/f16] update to 4.300000
Summary of changes: 7bb2939... update to 4.30 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Dist-Zilla/f15] update to 4.300000
Summary of changes: 7bb2939... update to 4.30 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Dist-Zilla/f14] update to 4.300000
Summary of changes: 7bb2939... update to 4.30 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-9.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Hash-FieldHash
perl-Hash-FieldHash has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc15.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4) On i386: perl-Hash-FieldHash-0.10-2.fc15.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.4) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch
perl-NOCpulse-Gritch has broken dependencies in the F-16 tree: On x86_64: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) On i386: perl-NOCpulse-Gritch-1.27.9-1.fc16.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.12.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Version/f15] Initial import (perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3)
Summary of changes: 6beed13... Initial import (perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8/f16] Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2)
Summary of changes: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8/f14] Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2)
Summary of changes: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.el4
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.el4' was created pointing to: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.el5
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.el5' was created pointing to: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.el6
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.el6' was created pointing to: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc14
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc14' was created pointing to: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc15' was created pointing to: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc16' was created pointing to: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8] Created tag perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc17
The lightweight tag 'perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2.fc17' was created pointing to: 63560f8... Initial import (perl-Unicode-CheckUTF8-1.03-2) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Test-Version/f14] Initial import (perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3)
Summary of changes: 6beed13... Initial import (perl-Test-Version-1.0.0-3) (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Module-Metadata-1.000006.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Metadata: a9b445f7aac0230015f9e193ecfa6f04 Module-Metadata-1.06.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Metadata] Update to 1.000006
commit 62563eb06a4ac0f8aaec321b2d4776f95497a306
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sun Sep 4 23:17:20 2011 +0100
Update to 1.06
- New upstream release 1.06
- Support PACKAGE BLOCK syntax
perl-Module-Metadata.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Module-Metadata.spec b/perl-Module-Metadata.spec
index 6b65ddc..dbd7625 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Metadata.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Metadata.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Module-Metadata
-Version: 1.05
+Version: 1.06
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Gather package and POD information from perl module files
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -51,6 +51,10 @@ make test TEST_FILES=t/*.t xt/*.t
%{_mandir}/man3/Module::Metadata.3pm*
%changelog
+* Sun Sep 4 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.06-1
+- Update to 1.06
+ - Support PACKAGE BLOCK syntax
+
* Wed Aug 3 2011 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.05-1
- Update to 1.05
- Localize $package::VERSION during version discovery
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 97e0974..f6cf8f0 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3944bd9e514d802e6d43560e6225220b Module-Metadata-1.05.tar.gz
+a9b445f7aac0230015f9e193ecfa6f04 Module-Metadata-1.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Metadata/f16] Update to 1.000006
Summary of changes: 62563eb... Update to 1.06 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000006-1.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.06-1.fc16' was created pointing to: 62563eb... Update to 1.06 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Metadata] Created tag perl-Module-Metadata-1.000006-1.fc17
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-Metadata-1.06-1.fc17' was created pointing to: 62563eb... Update to 1.06 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File GD-SecurityImage-1.71.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-GD-SecurityImage: 0f8be735452d733e675c77d70c0cfea7 GD-SecurityImage-1.71.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-GD-SecurityImage] Update to 1.7
commit af3deb36e6bca511e7391038baba3c2f1f26aa25
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr
Date: Mon Sep 5 03:00:40 2011 +0200
Update to 1.7
.gitignore |1 +
perl-GD-SecurityImage.spec | 17 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 01b2e3c..d0b1ed5 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
GD-SecurityImage-1.70.tar.gz
+/GD-SecurityImage-1.71.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-GD-SecurityImage.spec b/perl-GD-SecurityImage.spec
index dc2e3ed..1017277 100644
--- a/perl-GD-SecurityImage.spec
+++ b/perl-GD-SecurityImage.spec
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
Name: perl-GD-SecurityImage
-Version:1.70
-Release:4%{?dist}
+Version:1.71
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Security image (captcha) generator
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/GD-SecurityImage/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/B/BU/BURAK/GD-SecurityImage-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl(GD)
BuildRequires: perl(Image::Magick)
BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
%{?perl_default_filter}
@@ -34,8 +34,6 @@ mv -f README.UTF-8 README
./Build
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
@@ -44,16 +42,17 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {}
2/dev/null \;
%check
./Build test
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc Changes eg LICENSE README SPEC StayPuft.ttf
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Sep 05 2011 Emmanuel Seyman emmanuel.sey...@club-internet.fr - 1.71-1
+- Update to 1.71
+- Clean up spec file
+- Add Test::Pod::Coverage as a BR to enable all tests
+
* Tue Jun 28 2011 Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.70-4
- Perl mass rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 43c7692..6edb040 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-44198b091ad179241dcd1b0d270e04bc GD-SecurityImage-1.70.tar.gz
+0f8be735452d733e675c77d70c0cfea7 GD-SecurityImage-1.71.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
