Re: Self Introduction
Osier Yang wrote: Hello there, My name is Osier Yang, and I'm willing to be a Co-maitainer of libvirt project. Welcome! Consider using this API tracker for your library when maintaining packages: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libvirt.html Let me introduce myself briefly. I am a Software Engineer in Red Hat's Virtualization team, and the project I'm working on is libvirt, (yes, the one I want to build packages for). I joined in Redhat more than 3 years ago, and have been libvirt developer for about half past one year. I have been used Linux for about 7 years, since I was in college, the first distro I used is Hiweed, which is a light Chinese localized distro based on GNU/Debian, it was good, but I bet you don't known it. :-). Okay, I see someone was introducing the hobbies, so my hobbies are quite a lot, the most favoured one is Guita. I don't have much experience on Fedora package building yet, nor for other Linux distributions, but I could learn from the other maitainers of libvirt quickly to do that. looking forward to hear from you soon. Regards, Osier -- Andrey Ponomarenko, ROSA Lab. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Self introduction for package submission
I am a long time Fedora user and want to submit some contributed packages again. I work for IBM Brazil as an Information and IT Architect and general hacker. If there are any IBMers in this list, my BluePages ID is a...@br.ibm.com My next e-mails will be plain package submissions. Thank you AVI ALKALAY ♦ אבי אלקלעי information architect • software engineer • hacker digital media • security • mobility • business intelligence ☎ +55-11-9659-9059 (Mobile • FaceTime • WhatsApp) ✤ http://Avi.Alkalay.net/blog http://avi.alkalay.net/ ★ avibra...@gmail.com (Google Docs • Talk • Latitude) @ avibrazil (Twitter • Facebook) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Django 1.4 in F17?
Hi, Is there a possibility to see Django 1.4 in F17? Django 1.4 RC1 came out yesterday, the final release is expected within a month from now. AFAICS there are no real incomapatibilities, see: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4/ -- --Jos Vos j...@xos.nl --X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 --Amsterdam, The Netherlands| Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Please review packages: perl-WWW-Google-Contacts, perl-Net-Google-Calendar, perl-Net-Google-Spreadsheets, AtomicParsley
Here are some packages I have just submitted for review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800102 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800105 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800265 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800284 AtomicParsley is an MP4 tagger with iTunes-style tags. The perl-Net-Google-Spreadsheets package has a new dependency on perl-Net-Google-DataAPI also submitted at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800264 Thank you in advance -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Package Review Request: python-picloud
On 03/06/2012 03:11 AM, Vijay N. Majagaonkar wrote: Please, no! %{__cp} hugely decreases readability and if the situation happens that mkdir and cp are not in the $PATH we will have much bigger problems than running sed on all .spec files. I am sorry but this will hit even if you don't use macro when tools are not in $PATH, unless you use full path Use just plain Unix commands as $DEITY intended them to be used. I believe macro give you plain Unix command with full path. It does, but the current packaging guidelines say not to use these macros: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Macros Macro forms of system executables SHOULD NOT be used except when there is a need to allow the location of those executables to be configurable. For example, rm should be used in preference to %{__rm}, but %{__python} is acceptable. When reviewing a package, you need to be familiar with the guidelines and not suggest changes that are in contradiction with them. Paul. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F-17 Branched report: 20120306 changes
Compose started at Tue Mar 6 08:15:08 UTC 2012 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [HippoDraw] HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.i686 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-devel-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray HippoDraw-python-1.21.3-2.fc17.x86_64 requires python-numarray [aeolus-conductor] aeolus-conductor-0.4.0-2.fc17.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 [aeolus-configserver] aeolus-configserver-0.4.1-5.fc17.noarch requires ruby-nokogiri [alexandria] alexandria-0.6.8-2.fc17.1.noarch requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 [asterisk] asterisk-ais-10.0.0-1.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libSaEvt.so.3(OPENAIS_EVT_B.01.01)(64bit) asterisk-ais-10.0.0-1.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libSaEvt.so.3()(64bit) asterisk-ais-10.0.0-1.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libSaClm.so.3(OPENAIS_CLM_B.01.01)(64bit) asterisk-ais-10.0.0-1.fc17.1.x86_64 requires libSaClm.so.3()(64bit) [aunit] aunit-2010-3.fc16.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so aunit-2010-3.fc16.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit) [banshee] banshee-meego-2.2.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires mutter-meego [catfish] catfish-engines-0.3.2-4.fc17.1.noarch requires pinot [comoonics-cdsl-py] comoonics-cdsl-py-0.2-19.noarch requires comoonics-base-py [comoonics-cluster-py] comoonics-cluster-py-0.1-25.noarch requires comoonics-base-py [contextkit] contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.i686 requires libcdb.so.1 contextkit-0.5.15-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libcdb.so.1()(64bit) [couchdb] couchdb-1.0.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libicuuc.so.46()(64bit) couchdb-1.0.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libicui18n.so.46()(64bit) couchdb-1.0.3-2.fc16.x86_64 requires libicudata.so.46()(64bit) [curry] curry-0.9.11-7.fc12.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) [dh-make] dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper [eruby] eruby-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.i686 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.i686 requires libruby.so.1.8 eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.8 eruby-libs-1.0.5-17.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) [fantasdic] fantasdic-1.0-0.9.beta7.fc17.noarch requires ruby(gettext-package) [gcc-python-plugin] gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 gcc-python2-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 gcc-python3-plugin-0.9-1.fc17.x86_64 requires gcc = 0:4.7.0-0.10.fc17 [gdal] gdal-ruby-1.7.3-12.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) [gearmand] gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libtcmalloc.so.0()(64bit) gearmand-0.23-2.fc17.x86_64 requires libboost_program_options-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit) [genius] genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) gnome-genius-1.0.12-2.fc15.x86_64 requires libgmp.so.3()(64bit) [geos] geos-ruby-3.3.2-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libruby.so.1.8()(64bit) [gnatcoll] gnatcoll-2011-6.fc17.i686 requires libgnat-4.6.so gnatcoll-2011-6.fc17.i686 requires libgnarl-4.6.so gnatcoll-2011-6.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnat-4.6.so()(64bit) gnatcoll-2011-6.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnarl-4.6.so()(64bit) [gnome-phone-manager] gnome-phone-manager-0.66-9.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnome-bluetooth.so.9()(64bit) [gnome-user-share] gnome-user-share-3.0.1-3.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnome-bluetooth.so.9()(64bit) [gnucash] gnucash-2.4.8-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libgoffice-0.8.so.8()(64bit) [gorm] gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libobjc.so.3 gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.20 gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.i686 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.23 gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libobjc.so.3()(64bit) gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnustep-gui.so.0.20()(64bit) gorm-1.2.13-0.2.20110331.fc17.x86_64 requires libgnustep-base.so.1.23()(64bit) [gphpedit] gphpedit-0.9.95-0.2.20090209snap.fc15.x86_64 requires libgtkhtml-2.so.0()(64bit) [gpsdrive] gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires libmapnik.so.0.7()(64bit) gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires libboost_thread-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit) gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires libboost_system-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit) gpsdrive-2.11-10.fc17.x86_64 requires libboost_filesystem-mt.so.1.47.0()(64bit) [grads] grads-2.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64 requires libsx.so.0()(64bit) [grass] grass-6.4.1-5.fc17.x86_64 requires libgeos-3.3.1.so()(64bit) grass-libs-6.4.1-5.fc17.i686 requires libgeos-3.3.1.so grass-libs-6.4.1-5.fc17.x86_64 requires libgeos-3.3.1.so()(64bit) [gscribble]
Re: Fedora 18 feature processing?
On 03/05/2012 05:54 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Panu Matilainen pmati...@laiskiainen.org wrote: Hey, I'm wondering whether there's some kind of disconnect in the feature process at the moment: In order to avoid the kind of last-minute inclusion craze that everybody hates, we decided to postpone rpm-4.10 for F18 and hoped to get a pre-release version into rawhide right after branching F17, but it's been almost a month now since filing the feature (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RPM4.10) ready for wrangler, with no signs of activity from the wrangler to pass it on to FESCo (or request corrections) that I can see. Any idea what's up here? Lots of people are understandably busy with F17 preparations at this point, but now would also be the perfect time to start introducing features deemed for F18 into rawhide, rather than day before feature freeze. I'd rather have my feature done and dealt with well before F18 alpha even appears on the horizon. I don't think you need to wait for the Feature wrangler here. Just commit it to the master branch and build for F18. It's not like kernel, gcc, and glibc upgrades sit around waiting on a Feature page to get looked at. Unless there is something that requires a large coordination with other packages, I think you're good. Well, that'd be just fine with me, I've just been trying to play by the book. If it's ok for *some* features to proceed without prior acceptance then perhaps the policy should be clarified on that. - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: User session printing
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) said: For things like cloud printing, where the print server is a hosted service somewhere out in the Internet, I think the applications should be talking directly to it (via the print dialog). For a plain network printer, where the printer might not be able to accept the job while it's busy processing others, you might have to queue the job and retry it later. So if you are doing that as a user process, how should that work when you log out, and when the machine is restarted? It waits until you log in again. I wonder if that works with longer print jobs: - User: I'll kick that one off before the weekend, it might take a while, so that I won't disturb others. - (User's) cupsd: queues the job in user's home, starts printing onto the printer. - User logs off after 15 pages of 300 are printed. - systemd kills off all processes in user session cgroup, including cupsd. - User: Aiiieh!, heads off into the weekend as he has to catch a bus, forgets about it. - User returns after the weekend, logs in again, cupsd picks up the still queued print job from user's home, starts printing the remaining 285 pages. Nils -- Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: User session printing
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Nils Philippsen n...@redhat.com wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:02 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Tim Waugh (twa...@redhat.com) said: For things like cloud printing, where the print server is a hosted service somewhere out in the Internet, I think the applications should be talking directly to it (via the print dialog). For a plain network printer, where the printer might not be able to accept the job while it's busy processing others, you might have to queue the job and retry it later. So if you are doing that as a user process, how should that work when you log out, and when the machine is restarted? It waits until you log in again. I wonder if that works with longer print jobs: - User: I'll kick that one off before the weekend, it might take a while, so that I won't disturb others. - (User's) cupsd: queues the job in user's home, starts printing onto the printer. - User logs off after 15 pages of 300 are printed. - systemd kills off all processes in user session cgroup, including cupsd. - User: Aiiieh!, heads off into the weekend as he has to catch a bus, forgets about it. - User returns after the weekend, logs in again, cupsd picks up the still queued print job from user's home, starts printing the remaining 285 pages. This requires: * A network printer * ... that has a 300page paper tray, so it is clearly an industrial one * ... but does not have a separate print queue * an user that starts a print job and leaves? I don't know how much that is likely. In any case, the per-user cupsd could stay running after the user logs off until the queue is empty - then there should be no discernible difference between the system queue and per-user queue until the system reboots (when it reboots, the per-user cupsd probably wouldn't start and continue processing the job again - although that could be arranged as well). Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F17 Alpha and VMWare Fusion
Last night I attempted an install of F17 Alpha on VMWare Fusion. 1) My first attempt was using the install DVD. I was redirected into a text installer, I was not prompted to select packages. The resulting install hard lock starting SSH 2) Trying the KDE LiveCD froze during boot (don't know on what since the boot screen was up). Has anyone else seen this? -- Mark Bidewell http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: User session printing
Le Mar 6 mars 2012 14:53, Miloslav Trmač a écrit : This requires: * A network printer * ... that has a 300page paper tray, so it is clearly an industrial one ̌1. The standard paper tray for even the smallest laser is usually 250 pages, they are dirt cheap and a second paper tray is not expensive http://reviews.cnet.co.uk/printers/brother-hl-2250dn-review-50004574/ Microscopic paper trays are reserved for color inkjets where you pay an arm and a leg for a microgram of bad ink. 2. Ghostscript postscript quite often confuses postscript printers and they'll happily print hundreds of pages of garbage for one bad ps page. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [389-devel] New Transformation Plugin proposal
Hi Mark, there are already serveral plugins and/or feature requests for generating this sort of virtual attributes ( http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Roadmap, http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Wishlist): Virtual DIT/Tree Views CoS + explict scoping(i think it's closest to your idea, maybe it's wiser to extend the features of CoS) dynamic group extension @+ 2012/3/2 Mark Reynolds marey...@redhat.com Hi Everyone, I figured I'd send this out since we are looking to possibly add proxy functionality to DS down the road. This came about because someone asked if there was a way to convert gmt timestamps to local time. Things like passwordexpiretime, modifierstimestamp, etc. A postop plugin to convert attributes values of generalized time syntax to local time would handle this request fine. By why stop there... Some of the features that ldap proxy servers do is transform data before it gets to the client. I'm not proposing combining all of a ldap proxy server's features into the core DS, but we can do some with a little work. For example(just to name a few): - Hide values - Change values - Mask values - Convert values(like timestamps that I mentioned above) - Merge/Virtualize values Use the configuration to scope this out. Have different transformations for different subtrees, bind DN's, target filters, etc. I can see a lot of uses for this type of functionality. It's just an idea, but I wanted to throw it out there and see what you all think. Thanks, Mark -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.**org 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/389-develhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: F17 Alpha and VMWare Fusion
Try i686 iso, the x86_64 is broken. On 03/06/2012 03:43 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote: Last night I attempted an install of F17 Alpha on VMWare Fusion. 1) My first attempt was using the install DVD. I was redirected into a text installer, I was not prompted to select packages. The resulting install hard lock starting SSH 2) Trying the KDE LiveCD froze during boot (don't know on what since the boot screen was up). Has anyone else seen this? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F17 Alpha and VMWare Fusion
On Tue, Mar 6, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Martin Stransky stran...@redhat.com wrote: Try i686 iso, the x86_64 is broken. On 03/06/2012 03:43 PM, Mark Bidewell wrote: Last night I attempted an install of F17 Alpha on VMWare Fusion. 1) My first attempt was using the install DVD. I was redirected into a text installer, I was not prompted to select packages. The resulting install hard lock starting SSH 2) Trying the KDE LiveCD froze during boot (don't know on what since the boot screen was up). Has anyone else seen this? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.**org/mailman/listinfo/develhttps://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Thanks, will do. -- Mark Bidewell http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Orphaning a couple of packages
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Eric Smith e...@brouhaha.com wrote: Fabian Deutsch wrote: because I no longer use them I am orpahning dbh Took dbh. -J muParser scidavis I use muParser in Meshlab. I'm not a C++ whiz (as witnessed by my not yet having figured out how to make Meshlab build properly with GCC 4.7, so I'm waiting for upstream on that), so if anyone with better C++ skills wants to take over maintaining the muParser package, feel free, but otherwise I'll do it. Best regards, Eric -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: F17 Alpha and VMWare Fusion
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 15:43:23 +0100, Mark Bidewell wrote: Last night I attempted an install of F17 Alpha on VMWare Fusion. 1) My first attempt was using the install DVD. I was redirected into a text installer, I was not prompted to select packages. The resulting install hard lock starting SSH Confirming: /usr/bin/qemu-kvm -cdrom Fedora-17-Alpha-x86_64-DVD.iso -boot d -m 2048 -vga vmware fails to initialize X and falls back to text. It works with any of -vga cirrus/std/qxl. I have not found Anaconda Bug for it, if it belongs to Anaconda though. Regards, Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Detecting Postgres version during build
On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 01:13:24AM +0100, Gianluca Sforna wrote: I am trying to build a package that provides a Postegres cartridge compatible with 8.x and 9.x. Unfortunately the cartridge related files are not installed in the same path for both version so I am looking for a way to query the version against I'm building and pick the correct path. Is there any standard mean for doing what I need? If you BuildRequire the database itself (likely you don't) then postgres --version + some scripting seems to do what you want: $ postgres --version | awk '{print $3}' 9.1.2 I suspect this isn't going to do what your users need. What happens if they connect to a remote PostgreSQL database? I'm guessing they could use either cartridge depending on the remote version, so you probably want to build and install both of them, if that is possible. More context could help, including knowing which package you are trying to build and what this cartridge actually does. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [ACTION NO LONGER REQUIRED] Retired packages for F-17
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: dbh-1.0.24-9.fc12 I just took this and am working on the FTBFS nightview-0.3.3-2.fc14 Lubo maintains this, I may request ownership if I can fix the FTBFS. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Django 1.4 in F17?
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:03 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: Hi, Is there a possibility to see Django 1.4 in F17? Django 1.4 RC1 came out yesterday, the final release is expected within a month from now. AFAICS there are no real incomapatibilities, see: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4/ On a related point, the impending release of Django 1.4 means the end of upstream support for Django 1.2.x, which is currently what is shipping in EPEL 5 and 6. This puts EPEL in a bit of a pickle. 1.2.x-1.3.x or 1.4.x includes known backwards-incompatible changes. On the other hand, upstream will not be providing any fixes (security or otherwise) once 1.4 is released. As a related consideration, some other Django-derived projects such as Review Board already have Django 1.3 as a minimum for their latest releases. Review Board in particular is planning to move to Django 1.4 as its minimum for it's next major release. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic
On Sat, 2012-03-03 at 15:46 -0800, Scott Doty wrote: On 03/03/2012 03:22 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Scott Dotysc...@ponzo.net wrote: How about allowing all printer management of local printers (including adding a network printer, as Linus his daughter were dealing with) with two factors: 1) user password 2) physical access ...because PolKit already knows when the user is sitting at the console, right? Sitting at the console is not equivalent to unrestricted physical access allowed, e.g. in any university computer lab. Agreed. Since we're talking two use case though -- home user and lab user -- it would make sense to have another rpm that would be installed to give the desired behavior to one of the cases (the other case being the default). I'm not sure about the demographics of Fedora installations, but I would suspect that most lab administrators will be more cognizant of what goes into their lab machines. Thus, I suggest there be added a new package to alter the behavior for lab machines (and similar use cases), something like polkit-i-am-a-lab, or whichever. What do you think? I think that having RPM packages installed (or not) is not a suitable means for switching on and off certain (sets of) configuration. Beyond that (and I'm not through the thread completely, so forgive me if that's been stated elsewhere already), I think it'd be worthwhile to think about usage profiles like this which come with a set of configuration defaults tailored to a particular use case, overridable/extensible by the admin. We just shouldn't come up with some kind of OO-monster for which admins will hate us. Nils -- Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Django 1.4 in F17?
On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 10:31:48 -0500 Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 10:03 +0100, Jos Vos wrote: Hi, Is there a possibility to see Django 1.4 in F17? Django 1.4 RC1 came out yesterday, the final release is expected within a month from now. AFAICS there are no real incomapatibilities, see: https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4/ On a related point, the impending release of Django 1.4 means the end of upstream support for Django 1.2.x, which is currently what is shipping in EPEL 5 and 6. This puts EPEL in a bit of a pickle. 1.2.x-1.3.x or 1.4.x includes known backwards-incompatible changes. On the other hand, upstream will not be providing any fixes (security or otherwise) once 1.4 is released. As a related consideration, some other Django-derived projects such as Review Board already have Django 1.3 as a minimum for their latest releases. Review Board in particular is planning to move to Django 1.4 as its minimum for it's next major release. yeah, this sort of thing comes up sadly. I think in the EPEL world the conclusion we came to was: - Create a parallel installable 1.4 version, submit for review and get added to the collection. - Continue to maintain the 1.2 version as long as it's feasible to backport security fixes or the like. Note to the epel-announce list that 1.2 is on life support and ask people to consider moving to 1.4. - When 1.2 becomes no longer possible to support, announce to epel-announce that it's going to end of life. - After a while, end of life it. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
GSoC 2012 ideas - support expanding the list
Hello Folks, Please add your ideas and expand the GSoC 2012 idea list[1]. Ideas and mentors welcome, thanks. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2012 -- Regards, Buddhike Chandradeepa Kurera(bckurera) Fedora Ambassador Sri Lanka Event Liaison - Design Team Email: bckur...@fedoraproject.org | IRC: bckurera -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/05/2012 03:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I wanted to add selinux=0 to the kernel command line on F17. I checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I found file: /etc/default/grub Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9WOXAACgkQrlYvE4MpobOO9gCfW7AcfumcGL4tpinoMKHw3kKr 6WYAniE6FG4UuumbrJYLZ7KOV8/4a0H5 =6/u0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Daniel J Walsh wrote: Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. Or the more obvious place for people with /etc/sysconfig hardcoded in their brain, /etc/sysconfig/selinux :) Though to be honest, F17 is the first version where I have been working with selinux enabled for more then two days. In fact, I have left it enabled since I installed F17 weeks ago. I think the only somewhat valid reason to disabled selinux is if people are using special directories they made up, eg /vol or /opt or anything. (or when copying/dealing with /var/lib/libvirtd/images content in other locations :) Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
On 03/06/2012 04:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 03/05/2012 03:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I wanted to add selinux=0 to the kernel command line on F17. I checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I found file: /etc/default/grub Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. There are subtle differences with doing that apparently. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2012-02/msg00176.html cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
2012/3/6 Paul Wouters pwout...@redhat.com: On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Daniel J Walsh wrote: Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. Or the more obvious place for people with /etc/sysconfig hardcoded in their brain, /etc/sysconfig/selinux :) Though to be honest, F17 is the first version where I have been working with selinux enabled for more then two days. In fact, I have left it enabled since I installed F17 weeks ago. I think the only somewhat valid reason to disabled selinux is if people are using special directories they made up, eg /vol or /opt or anything. (or when copying/dealing with /var/lib/libvirtd/images content in other locations :) I do a lot of stupid things on my development systems. Some things I keep in /home/data, I've got many /home/samba* dirs and project dirs in /home/michal/projekty that need to be shared on samba and need to be accesible by httpd servers. I never had time to deal with SELinux on development system :) Paul -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
2012/3/6 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com: On 03/06/2012 04:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 03/05/2012 03:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I wanted to add selinux=0 to the kernel command line on F17. I checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I found file: /etc/default/grub Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. There are subtle differences with doing that apparently. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2012-02/msg00176.html Once I had a problem to disable SELinux through /etc/sysconfig/selinux - there was a problem with the policy, systemd releated or something like that. So I use big hammer - selinux=0. cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2012 11:38 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2012/3/6 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com: On 03/06/2012 04:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 03/05/2012 03:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I wanted to add selinux=0 to the kernel command line on F17. I checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I found file: /etc/default/grub Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. There are subtle differences with doing that apparently. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2012-02/msg00176.html Once I had a problem to disable SELinux through /etc/sysconfig/selinux - there was a problem with the policy, systemd releated or something like that. So I use big hammer - selinux=0. cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel I hope this does not get taken out of context. SLASHDOT/Dan Walsh says disable SELinux. :^) You should try to run with SELinux on or in permissive mode. But if you feel you have to disable SELinux, use the config file. If there are bugs we need to know about them and fix them. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9WQAQACgkQrlYvE4MpobMoTQCgvbQk8eKnJNcqAkDUrO2WDVJa hrIAnR1+2KVLMkD56P5ADtU1dcXWx+Cq =3VyF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
On 3/6/2012 11:27 AM, Paul Wouters wrote: On Tue, 6 Mar 2012, Daniel J Walsh wrote: Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. Or the more obvious place for people with /etc/sysconfig hardcoded in their brain, /etc/sysconfig/selinux :) Though to be honest, F17 is the first version where I have been working with selinux enabled for more then two days. In fact, I have left it enabled since I installed F17 weeks ago. I think the only somewhat valid reason to disabled selinux is if people are using special directories they made up, eg /vol or /opt or anything. (or when copying/dealing with /var/lib/libvirtd/images content in other locations :) Paul Alternatively you could look at Dan Walsh's 4 things SELinux is trying to tell you talk and in about 30 minutes figure out how to make those special directories work and not disable the security on your system. Dave -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: /etc/default in Fedora
W dniu 6 marca 2012 17:49 użytkownik Daniel J Walsh dwa...@redhat.com napisał: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/06/2012 11:38 AM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: 2012/3/6 Pádraig Brady p...@draigbrady.com: On 03/06/2012 04:21 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: On 03/05/2012 03:20 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote: Hi, I wanted to add selinux=0 to the kernel command line on F17. I checked /etc/sysconfig/, /etc/grub.d/, next I started to read /etc/grub.d/10_linux (this new grub2 is so user friendly..) and I found ${GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX}. So I grepped /etc for GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX. I found file: /etc/default/grub Why /etc/default dir is used instead of /etc/sysconfig? To be honest - it's not really user friendly from long time RH Linux user POV. Just disable SELinux in /etc/selinux/config. There are subtle differences with doing that apparently. http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/coreutils/2012-02/msg00176.html Once I had a problem to disable SELinux through /etc/sysconfig/selinux - there was a problem with the policy, systemd releated or something like that. So I use big hammer - selinux=0. cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel I hope this does not get taken out of context. SLASHDOT/Dan Walsh says disable SELinux. :^) You should try to run with SELinux on or in permissive mode. Now I have a laptop with CPU that is virtualization capable, so if I find a little more free time I'll try to prepare configuration on VM. But if you feel you have to disable SELinux, use the config file. If there are bugs we need to know about them and fix them. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9WQAQACgkQrlYvE4MpobMoTQCgvbQk8eKnJNcqAkDUrO2WDVJa hrIAnR1+2KVLMkD56P5ADtU1dcXWx+Cq =3VyF -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
New Member
My name is Samuel Patterson and I'm the new guy on the block. I'm 21 years old and live in the United States, Im not good with introductions, so i'll make it short. I've been using fedora since the fedora core years and, I decided to start contributing to my fellow man in the open-source community; specifically in fedora. What I want to do is learn how to patch and code. I know it's a mouthful, but I just recently started to learn about both c/c++ and would like to see how I can code software as well as patch things up. I'm in the market for a mentor so anyone is welcome. Thanks, Samuel Patterson -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1
Hi , I found this error /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../lib64/libgpac_static.a(base_encoding.o): undefined reference to symbol 'deflate' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'deflate' is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /lib64/libz.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Could someone help me , to understand what happens ? Thanks in advance, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:10 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Hi , I found this error /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../lib64/libgpac_static.a(base_encoding.o): undefined reference to symbol 'deflate' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'deflate' is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /lib64/libz.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Could someone help me , to understand what happens ? AIUI, it looks like the code you try to compile uses the deflate() function from libz, and doesn't link it directly (i.e. the -lz compiler option) but indirectly (i.e. links a library which uses libz). You need to explicitly link all libraries that you use, you may not depend on other libraries pulling these in. Nils -- Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1
Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2012, 17:10 + schrieb Sérgio Basto: Hi , I found this error /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../lib64/libgpac_static.a(base_encoding.o): undefined reference to symbol 'deflate' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'deflate' is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /lib64/libz.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status DSO is something like an auto-symbol-resolver (so linking in libraries that are used by other directly-linked libraries, google for with with fedora). DSO is deactivated on fedora, therefor you need to pass each library required to the linker. In the above case you need to additionally pass -lz to the linked (e.g. using LDLAGS=-lz), as suggested by gcc (which says: is defined in) Greetings fabian Could someone help me , to understand what happens ? Thanks in advance, -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1
yeah ,I think, I install zlib-devel and fix the problem , because detect zlib. Thanks On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:21 +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2012, 17:10 + schrieb Sérgio Basto: Hi , I found this error /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../lib64/libgpac_static.a(base_encoding.o): undefined reference to symbol 'deflate' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'deflate' is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /lib64/libz.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status DSO is something like an auto-symbol-resolver (so linking in libraries that are used by other directly-linked libraries, google for with with fedora). DSO is deactivated on fedora, therefor you need to pass each library required to the linker. In the above case you need to additionally pass -lz to the linked (e.g. using LDLAGS=-lz), as suggested by gcc (which says: is defined in) Greetings fabian Could someone help me , to understand what happens ? Thanks in advance, -- Sérgio M. B. -- Sérgio M. B. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 17:10 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: Could someone help me , to understand what happens ? Thanks in advance, Wiki page alert ;) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UnderstandingDSOLinkChange -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur: FranciscoD http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha http://dodoincfedora.wordpress.com/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Bodhi problems?
On Tue, 6 Mar 2012 19:50:22 +0200 Gilboa Davara gilb...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:14 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote: We may have tracked this down to a new app server that only had 1 vcpu. (It was thus getting bogged down and not processing as normal). We have that app server all fixed up now. Can anyone who sees this problem again let us know? (Either reply here, file a ticket in fedora infrastructure trac or drop by #fedora-admin). A few minutes ago I tried pushing the updated remctl package to all Fedora branches. F17 worked, but F16 and F15 repeatedly fail with 500 Internal error. - Ken Same here. Still getting 500's. Unpushed a two packages. Needed ~3 attempts per-package. ok. I've filed: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/3178 to track and work on this issue. Please do add any additional info you have there and we will try and get this fixed up. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: what means is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1
On Tue, 2012-03-06 at 18:21 +0100, Fabian Deutsch wrote: Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2012, 17:10 + schrieb Sérgio Basto: Hi , I found this error /usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.7.0/../../../../lib64/libgpac_static.a(base_encoding.o): undefined reference to symbol 'deflate' /usr/bin/ld: note: 'deflate' is defined in DSO /lib64/libz.so.1 so try adding it to the linker command line /lib64/libz.so.1: could not read symbols: Invalid operation collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status DSO is something like an auto-symbol-resolver (so linking in libraries that are used by other directly-linked libraries, google for with with fedora). DSO is deactivated on fedora, therefor you need to pass each library required to the linker. DSO means dynamic shared object and is more or less just another word for shared library. In the above case you need to additionally pass -lz to the linked (e.g. using LDLAGS=-lz), as suggested by gcc (which says: is defined in) Nils -- Nils Philippsen Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase Red Hat a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty n...@redhat.com nor Safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759 PGP fingerprint: C4A8 9474 5C4C ADE3 2B8F 656D 47D8 9B65 6951 3011 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: [389-devel] Please review: coverity 12563 Read from pointer after free
On 03/06/2012 09:30 AM, Rich Megginson wrote: -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel ACK -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: [389-devel] Please review: coverity 12563 Read from pointer after free
Rich Megginson wrote: -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel ack. -- 389-devel mailing list 389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Re: ImageMagick update coming to 6.7.6-5 (.so.5)
05.03.2012 21:47, Sérgio Basto wrote: On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 21:11 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote: 05.03.2012 01:04, Sérgio Basto пишет: On Sun, 2012-03-04 at 19:33 +0100, Mario Santagiuliana wrote: In data domenica 26 febbraio 2012 18:39:14, Pavel Alexeev ha scritto: Hello. ImageMagick-6.7.6-5 will land to rawhide in short time. Soname change happened (.so.5), so dependency rebuild needed. Does it land on F17 ? , if not, why ? Do you think it have worth? I ready to do it. yes , not in koji ? Ok, that's done. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.7.5.6-3.fc17 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: libbluray soname bump
W dniu 11.12.2011 13:01, Xavier Bachelot pisze: Hi, libbluray has made its first official release a few days ago. The soname was bumped to 1.0.0 just before the release, in order to make sure it's incompatible with older snapshots they have produced. The snapshots I've made and packaged for Fedora are compatible with the release, so Fedora/RPM Fusion packages should be fine after a simple rebuild. I would like to have a clean start with this library and have the updated package pushed to devel, but also to all currently active releases ( F-16, F-15 and EL-6), despite the soname breakage. Now that upstream is ready to push releases, I think it will be easier to keep the package in good shape if we follow them. Affected packages are as follow : For F17 and F16 : gvfs(fedora) mplayer (rpmfusion-free) xbmc(rpmfusion-free) For F15 : mplayer (rpmfusion-free) xbmc(rpmfusion-free) EL-6 doesn't have any affected package. Please let me know if you're ok with that, and I'll proceed with the builds and the build overrides request. Regards, Xavier So what happened with pushing libbluray to older Fedora branches? I am fine with rebuilding mplayer, do other apps rebuild cleanly? Julian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
netcdf 4.2 update coming - package split, reviews needed
I'm building netcdf 4.2-rc2 in rawhide now. This splits out the C++ and Fortran APIs into separate packages. Not sure I have time to do a swap, but I need the following reviews done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742605 - netcdf-cxx4 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744334 - netcdf-fortran Especially the latter one. This used to be part of the netcdf package but has been split off. They should be pretty straightforward. netcdf-cxx the old deprecated C++ api is already reviewed and in. Packages that need these will need to add a BR on netcdf-api-devel as appropriate. After these are reviewed I'll be pushing 4.2 into F17 as well. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GSoC 2012 ideas - support expanding the list
Hello: On 03/07/2012 03:08 AM, Buddhika Kurera wrote: Hello Folks, Please add your ideas and expand the GSoC 2012 idea list[1]. Ideas and mentors welcome, thanks. I have an idea and I would like to work on it as a student. Is it appropriate to add it to the wiki page there and put myself in the contacts and leave the Mentor blank? Thanks! -Amit -- http://echorand.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GSoC 2012 ideas - support expanding the list
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Amit Saha droid...@gmail.com wrote: Hello: I have an idea and I would like to work on it as a student. Is it appropriate to add it to the wiki page there and put myself in the contacts and leave the Mentor blank? Thanks! -Amit Dear Amit, Can you please share the idea on the list requesting a mentor. Then with a mentor you can add it to the list. AFAIK, you are a Fedora contributor[1], but adding student as a contact make some confusion I suppose. Therefore the best thing is share your idea on the list and then find a mentor. Therefore please share your idea on the list so that we can get some thoughts of other Fedorians as well. Thanks for the interest. [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Amitksaha -- Regards, Buddhike Chandradeepa Kurera(bckurera) Fedora Ambassador Sri Lanka Event Liaison - Design Team Email: bckur...@fedoraproject.org | IRC: bckurera -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GSoC 2012 ideas - support expanding the list
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Buddhika Kurera bckur...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Can you please share the idea on the list requesting a mentor. Then with a mentor you can add it to the list. AFAIK, you are a Fedora contributor[1], but adding student as a contact make some confusion I suppose. Therefore the best thing is share your idea on the list and then find a mentor. Therefore please share your idea on the list so that we can get some thoughts of other Fedorians as well. In the past there have been interested candidates/students who put up the ideas on the Talk: or, even the Main list with a note looking for a mentor and thereafter discussed the idea over the lists. Having it on the wiki page helps more eyes look over it than having to search through the email archives. -- sankarshan mukhopadhyay http://sankarshan.randomink.org/blog -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GSoC 2012 ideas - support expanding the list
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Amit Saha droid...@gmail.com wrote: Hello: I have an idea and I would like to work on it as a student. Is it appropriate to add it to the wiki page there and put myself in the contacts and leave the Mentor blank? Thanks! -Amit Hello Amit, I have added a new wiki page for Students Ideas[1], you can add your idea to that page. This age is linked with the main idea page so that every one can find the students idea page as well. Still I think it will be a good idea to forward your idea to the mailing list after adding it to the wiki. Thanks for the interest.. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2012/Students_Idea -- Regards, Buddhike Chandradeepa Kurera(bckurera) Fedora Ambassador Sri Lanka Event Liaison - Design Team Email: bckur...@fedoraproject.org | IRC: bckurera -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Self Introduction
On 03/06/2012 04:36 PM, Andrey Ponomarenko wrote: Osier Yang wrote: Hello there, My name is Osier Yang, and I'm willing to be a Co-maitainer of libvirt project. Welcome! Consider using this API tracker for your library when maintaining packages: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/libvirt.html Thanks!, it looks useful. Let me introduce myself briefly. I am a Software Engineer in Red Hat's Virtualization team, and the project I'm working on is libvirt, (yes, the one I want to build packages for). I joined in Redhat more than 3 years ago, and have been libvirt developer for about half past one year. I have been used Linux for about 7 years, since I was in college, the first distro I used is Hiweed, which is a light Chinese localized distro based on GNU/Debian, it was good, but I bet you don't known it. :-). Okay, I see someone was introducing the hobbies, so my hobbies are quite a lot, the most favoured one is Guita. I don't have much experience on Fedora package building yet, nor for other Linux distributions, but I could learn from the other maitainers of libvirt quickly to do that. looking forward to hear from you soon. Regards, Osier -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
GSoC fedora org application review
Dear Folks, GSoC mentoring organization application period will be end up with in less than 3 days. The draft of the application is read for review[1]. Please make your comments about the application with in today and tomorrow. The talk page[2] of the application wiki page, can be used for discussions. Then it is possible to submit it by 9th March 2012. Thanks for the support. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/GSoC_2012_org_application [2] https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:GSoC_2012_org_applicationaction=editredlink=1 -- Regards, Buddhike Chandradeepa Kurera(bckurera) Fedora Ambassador Sri Lanka Event Liaison - Design Team Email: bckur...@fedoraproject.org | IRC: bckurera -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Review Swap
Hi, I would like for a review swap for the following packages. They are sugar activities. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=795069 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=768700 -- Best Regards, Kalpa Pathum Welivitigoda http://about.me/callkalpa -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: GSoC 2012 ideas - support expanding the list
Hi Buddhika: On 03/07/2012 02:00 PM, Buddhika Kurera wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Amit Sahadroid...@gmail.com wrote: Hello: I have an idea and I would like to work on it as a student. Is it appropriate to add it to the wiki page there and put myself in the contacts and leave the Mentor blank? Thanks! -Amit Hello Amit, I have added a new wiki page for Students Ideas[1], you can add your idea to that page. This age is linked with the main idea page so that every one can find the students idea page as well. Still I think it will be a good idea to forward your idea to the mailing list after adding it to the wiki. Thanks for the interest.. Thank you for setting up the page. I added my idea here at [1]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Summer_coding_ideas_for_2012/Students_Idea#Fedora_On-Demand_Build_Service Best, Amit -- http://echorand.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Test-Announce] Test Days tomorrow (03-07) and Thursday (03-08)
Hey, folks - just another reminder, in case you've been under a rock, that we have the first two F17 Test Days coming up this week. Tomorrow is desktop localization Test Day[1], focusing on translation completeness and accuracy, and Thursday is OpenStack Test Day[2]. I have a blog post up with more blurb[3] if you're not familiar with the process or just love my writing THAT MUCH. Hope to see you at the test days! [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-07 [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2012-03-08_OpenStack_Test_Day [3] http://www.happyassassin.net/2012/03/05/fedora-17-test-days-start-up-this-week-desktop-localization-and-openstack/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Test-Announce] Fedora 17 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) Available Now!
As per the Fedora 17 schedule [1], Fedora 17 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including changes, can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5116 . Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing instructions. Normally dl.fedoraproject.org should provide the fastest download, but download-ib01.fedoraproject.org is available as a mirror (with an approximately 1 hour lag) in case of trouble. To use it, just replace dl with download-ib01 in the download URL. Installation: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Installation_Test Base: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Base_Test Desktop: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Current_Desktop_Test Ideally, all Alpha and Beta priority test cases for Installation [2], Base [3], and Desktop [4] should pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [5]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [6], or on the test list [7]. Create Fedora 17 Beta test compose (TC) - live and traditional https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5116 F17 Beta Blocker tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=752649 F17 Beta Nice-To-Have tracker bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=752652 [1] http://rbergero.fedorapeople.org/schedules/f-17/f-17-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Installation_validation_testing [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Base_validation_testing [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Desktop_validation_testing [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Beta_Release_Criteria [6] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [7] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ test-announce mailing list test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test-announce-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Bug 247250] Conflicting Provides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247250 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 03:37:23 EST --- mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc17 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 17. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc17 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 247250] Conflicting Provides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247250 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 03:56:52 EST --- mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Archive-Any] Created tag perl-Archive-Any-0.0932-9.el5
The lightweight tag 'perl-Archive-Any-0.0932-9.el5' was created pointing to: 437a544... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER] (11 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: fbfbd94... update to 0.16 (*) e0c02d2... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-SUPER (*) e542a60... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 9288f70... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 04f0a15... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-SUPER (*) 05e667c... dist-git conversion (*) eef2d54... dist-git conversion (*) f1c3082... Merge branch 'master' into el6 5611499... Merge branch 'master' into el5 0995cf1... Changelog clean-up 2a0b790... Spec clean-up (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER: 8/11] Merge branch 'master' into el6
commit f1c30826d7d47f732a031d4358f1dd7dcc64fa37 Merge: eef2d54 2b9c372 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 10:49:59 2012 + Merge branch 'master' into el6 perl-SUPER.spec | 17 - 1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER: 9/11] Merge branch 'master' into el5
commit 56114997e4695b33bbd4ce6ef7903239438c6125 Merge: 05e667c f1c3082 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 10:52:07 2012 + Merge branch 'master' into el5 Conflicts: .gitignore perl-SUPER.spec sources .gitignore |2 +- filter-provides.sh |3 -- perl-SUPER.spec| 66 +-- sources|2 +- 4 files changed, 55 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER: 10/11] Changelog clean-up
commit 0995cf1650d20c15190266f4712e8dc425a4991f Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 10:59:32 2012 + Changelog clean-up .gitignore |2 +- perl-SUPER.spec | 54 +++--- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index ee7a5a4..3436c98 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1 @@ -SUPER-1.17.tar.gz +/SUPER-[0-9.]*.tar.gz diff --git a/perl-SUPER.spec b/perl-SUPER.spec index fe59959..8a0424b 100644 --- a/perl-SUPER.spec +++ b/perl-SUPER.spec @@ -68,19 +68,19 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Dec 22 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.17-3 -- 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib +- Rebuild to fix problems with vendorarch/lib (#661697) * Thu May 06 2010 Marcela Maslanova mmasl...@redhat.com - 1.17-2 - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 -* Sun Sep 27 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.17-1 -- update filtering -- auto-update to 1.17 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01) -- added a new br on perl(Scalar::Util) (version 1.20) -- altered br on perl(Sub::Identify) (0 = 0.03) -- altered br on perl(Test::Simple) (0 = 0.61) -- added a new req on perl(Scalar::Util) (version 1.20) -- added a new req on perl(Sub::Identify) (version 0.03) +* Sun Sep 27 2009 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 1.17-1 +- Update filtering +- Auto-update to 1.17 (by cpan-spec-update 0.01) +- Added a new br on perl(Scalar::Util) (version 1.20) +- Altered br on perl(Sub::Identify) (0 = 0.03) +- Altered br on perl(Test::Simple) (0 = 0.61) +- Added a new req on perl(Scalar::Util) (version 1.20) +- Added a new req on perl(Sub::Identify) (version 0.03) * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.16-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild @@ -88,28 +88,28 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot} * Thu Feb 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.16-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild -* Tue Mar 04 2008 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com 1.16-3 -- rebuild for new perl +* Tue Mar 04 2008 Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com - 1.16-3 +- Rebuild for new perl -* Wed Jan 02 2008 Ralf Corsépius rc040...@freenet.de 1.16-2 -- Adjust License-tag. -- BR: perl(Test::Simple) (BZ 419631). +* Wed Jan 02 2008 Ralf Corsépius rc040...@freenet.de - 1.16-2 +- Adjust License-tag +- BR: perl(Test::Simple) (BZ 419631) -* Wed Apr 04 2007 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.16-1 -- update to 1.16 +* Wed Apr 04 2007 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 1.16-1 +- Update to 1.16 -* Tue Oct 03 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.15-1 -- update to 1.15 -- add explict requires on perl(Exporter); missed due to a use base construct +* Tue Oct 03 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 1.15-1 +- Update to 1.15 +- Add explict requires on perl(Exporter); missed due to a use base construct -* Thu Sep 07 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.14-4 -- bump +* Thu Sep 07 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 1.14-4 +- Bump -* Thu Sep 07 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.14-3 -- update %%description and %%summary +* Thu Sep 07 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 1.14-3 +- Update %%description and %%summary -* Thu Sep 07 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.14-2 -- filter errant perl(DB) provide +* Thu Sep 07 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 1.14-2 +- Filter errant perl(DB) provide -* Tue Sep 05 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu 1.14-1 -- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.69.1. +* Tue Sep 05 2006 Chris Weyl cw...@alumni.drew.edu - 1.14-1 +- Specfile autogenerated by cpanspec 1.69.1 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER: 11/11] Spec clean-up
commit 2a0b790122ade04a085bccecf37bf38b49535729 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 11:39:02 2012 + Spec clean-up - Add provides filters that work with all supported distributions - BR: perl(Carp) and perl(Exporter) - Make %files list more explicit - Drop explicit requires of perl(Exporter) since it's auto-detected by rpm 4.9 onwards, and is bundled with perl on all older distributions - Don't need to remove empty directories from buildroot - Don't use macros for commands - %defattr redundant since rpm 4.4 - Use tabs perl-SUPER.spec | 76 ++ 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-SUPER.spec b/perl-SUPER.spec index 8a0424b..077c8f3 100644 --- a/perl-SUPER.spec +++ b/perl-SUPER.spec @@ -1,49 +1,47 @@ -Name: perl-SUPER -Version:1.17 -Release:6%{?dist} -Summary:Sane superclass method dispatcher -License:GPL+ or Artistic -Group: Development/Libraries -URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/SUPER/ -Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CH/CHROMATIC/SUPER-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildArch: noarch -Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) - -BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) -BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple) = 0.61 -BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Identify) = 0.03 -BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.20 - -Requires: perl(Exporter) -Requires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.20 -Requires: perl(Sub::Identify) = 0.03 - -%{?perl_default_filter: -%filter_from_provides /perl(UNIVERSAL)/d; /perl(DB)/d -%perl_default_filter -} +Name: perl-SUPER +Version: 1.17 +Release: 7%{?dist} +Summary: Sane superclass method dispatcher +License: GPL+ or Artistic +Group: Development/Libraries +URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SUPER/ +Source0: http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/C/CH/CHROMATIC/SUPER-%{version}.tar.gz +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) +BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: perl(Carp) +BuildRequires: perl(Exporter) +BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) +BuildRequires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.20 +BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Identify) = 0.03 +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Simple) = 0.61 +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) +Requires: perl(Scalar::Util) = 1.20 +Requires: perl(Sub::Identify) = 0.03 + +# Filter out bogus provides (rpm 4.9 onwards) +%global __provides_exclude ^perl\\((DB|UNIVERSAL)\\) %description When subclassing a class, you occasionally want to dispatch control to the -superclass -- at least conditionally and temporarily. This module provides +superclass - at least conditionally and temporarily. This module provides an easier, cleaner way for class methods to access their ancestor's implementation. %prep %setup -q -n SUPER-%{version} +# Filter out bogus provides (prior to rpm 4.9) +%global provfilt /bin/sh -c %{__perl_provides} | grep -Evx 'perl[(](DB|UNIVERSAL)[)]' +%define __perl_provides %{provfilt} + %build -%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor +perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor ./Build %install rm -rf %{buildroot} - ./Build install destdir=%{buildroot} create_packlist=0 -find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; - -%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/* +%{_fixperms} %{buildroot} %check ./Build test @@ -52,12 +50,22 @@ find %{buildroot} -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; rm -rf %{buildroot} %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes README -%{perl_vendorlib}/* -%{_mandir}/man3/* +%{perl_vendorlib}/SUPER.pm +%{_mandir}/man3/SUPER.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Mar 6 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.17-7 +- Add provides filters that work with all supported distributions +- BR: perl(Carp) and perl(Exporter) +- Make %%files list more explicit +- Drop explicit requires of perl(Exporter) since it's auto-detected by rpm + 4.9 onwards, and is bundled with perl on all older distributions +- Don't need to remove empty directories from buildroot +- Don't use macros for commands +- %%defattr redundant since rpm 4.4 +- Use tabs + * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.17-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER/f17] (9 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into el5
Summary of changes: fbfbd94... update to 0.16 (*) e0c02d2... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-SUPER (*) e542a60... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 9288f70... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 04f0a15... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-SUPER (*) 05e667c... dist-git conversion (*) eef2d54... dist-git conversion (*) f1c3082... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) 5611499... Merge branch 'master' into el5 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER/f17] (2 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: 0995cf1... Changelog clean-up (*) 2a0b790... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER/f16] (12 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: fbfbd94... update to 0.16 (*) e0c02d2... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-SUPER (*) e542a60... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 9288f70... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 04f0a15... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-SUPER (*) 05e667c... dist-git conversion (*) eef2d54... dist-git conversion (*) 2b9c372... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) f1c3082... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) 5611499... Merge branch 'master' into el5 (*) 0995cf1... Changelog clean-up (*) 2a0b790... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER/f15] (13 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: fbfbd94... update to 0.16 (*) e0c02d2... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-SUPER (*) e542a60... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 9288f70... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 04f0a15... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-SUPER (*) 05e667c... dist-git conversion (*) eef2d54... dist-git conversion (*) 39deb4f... Perl mass rebuild (*) 2b9c372... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) f1c3082... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) 5611499... Merge branch 'master' into el5 (*) 0995cf1... Changelog clean-up (*) 2a0b790... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER/el6] (15 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: fbfbd94... update to 0.16 (*) e0c02d2... Initialize branch EL-5 for perl-SUPER (*) 4b43244... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 9288f70... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) d32bbf9... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 05e667c... dist-git conversion (*) e2a8b7e... dist-git conversion (*) f73923e... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*) a379bec... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*) 39deb4f... Perl mass rebuild (*) 2b9c372... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) f1c3082... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) 5611499... Merge branch 'master' into el5 (*) 0995cf1... Changelog clean-up (*) 2a0b790... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER/el5] (20 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: 09d10e6... update to 0.16 (*) 5482f50... - Adjust License-tag. - BR: perl(Test::Simple) (BZ 419631). (*) 694d4a4... new perl (*) a82acfe... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass (*) b90dc43... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass (*) 752f284... - update filtering - auto-update to 1.17 (by cpan-spec-upda (*) 4b43244... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) e542a60... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) d32bbf9... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 04f0a15... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-SUPER (*) e2a8b7e... dist-git conversion (*) eef2d54... dist-git conversion (*) f73923e... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*) a379bec... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*) 39deb4f... Perl mass rebuild (*) 2b9c372... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) f1c3082... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) 5611499... Merge branch 'master' into el5 (*) 0995cf1... Changelog clean-up (*) 2a0b790... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER] Created tag perl-SUPER-1.17-7.el5
The lightweight tag 'perl-SUPER-1.17-7.el5' was created pointing to: 2a0b790... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER] Created tag perl-SUPER-1.17-7.el6
The lightweight tag 'perl-SUPER-1.17-7.el6' was created pointing to: 2a0b790... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER] Created tag perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc15
The lightweight tag 'perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc15' was created pointing to: 2a0b790... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER] Created tag perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc16
The lightweight tag 'perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc16' was created pointing to: 2a0b790... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER] Created tag perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc17
The lightweight tag 'perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc17' was created pointing to: 2a0b790... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-SUPER] Created tag perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc18
The lightweight tag 'perl-SUPER-1.17-7.fc18' was created pointing to: 2a0b790... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 800241] Catalyst fails to locate user application library via Catalyst::ScriptRunner-run('MyApp', 'Server')
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=800241 Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com 2012-03-06 07:58:17 EST --- Upstream has a fix committed - and according to catalyst users' mailing list, should be releasing it soon. I prefer to wait for the release rather than patching in Fedora. In the meantime, running ./script/myapp_server.pl from the top-level MyApp directory works for me - only running /path/to/MyApp/script/myapp_server.pl fails when run from some other directory. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff] Spec clean-up
commit 8287e8154e45e5af3f1490154ddeaafc8dd7e404 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 15:14:06 2012 + Spec clean-up - Explicitly require perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) unless we have rpm ≥ 4.9, which can auto-detect the dependency - Drop buildreq perl(Module::Install) - Makefile.PL explicitly uses the one bundled in inc/ - Don't need to remove empty directories from buildroot - Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT - Make %files list more explicit - Don't use macros for commands - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 - Improve %description and %summary perl-Array-Diff.spec | 48 +++- 1 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Array-Diff.spec b/perl-Array-Diff.spec index 0ae474b..d272c87 100644 --- a/perl-Array-Diff.spec +++ b/perl-Array-Diff.spec @@ -1,44 +1,47 @@ +# Only need manual requires for use base XXX; prior to rpm 4.9 +%global rpm49 %(rpm --version | perl -pi -e 's/^.* (\\d+)\\.(\\d+).*/sprintf(%d.%03d,$1,$2) ge 4.009 ? 1 : 0/e') + Name: perl-Array-Diff Version:0.07 -Release:6%{?dist} +Release:7%{?dist} # Because 0.07 compares newer than 0.05002 in Perl world # but not in RPM world :-( Epoch: 1 -Summary:Diff two arrays +Summary:Find the differences between two arrays License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Array-Diff/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/T/TY/TYPESTER/Array-Diff-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) BuildArch: noarch BuildRequires: perl(Algorithm::Diff) BuildRequires: perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) -BuildRequires: perl(Module::Install) BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) -Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) +%if ! %{rpm49} +Requires: perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) +%endif %description -This module do diff two arrays, and return added and deleted arrays. It's -simple usage of Algorithm::Diff. +This module compares two arrays and returns the added or deleted elements in +two separate arrays. It's a simple wrapper around Algorithm::Diff. + +If you need more complex array tools, check Array::Compare. %prep %setup -q -n Array-Diff-%{version} %build -%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor +perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor make %{?_smp_mflags} %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT - -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; +make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \; - -%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %check make test @@ -47,13 +50,24 @@ make test rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) %doc Changes LICENSE README -%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Array +%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Array/ %{perl_vendorlib}/Array/Diff.pm -%{_mandir}/man3/*3pm* +%{_mandir}/man3/Array::Diff.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Mar 6 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1:0.07-7 +- Explicitly require perl(Class::Accessor::Fast) unless we have rpm ≥ 4.9, + which can auto-detect the dependency +- Drop buildreq perl(Module::Install) - Makefile.PL explicitly uses the one + bundled in inc/ +- Don't need to remove empty directories from buildroot +- Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT +- Make %%files list more explicit +- Don't use macros for commands +- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 +- Improve %%description and %%summary + * Fri Jan 13 2012 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1:0.07-6 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff/el5] Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: 8287e81... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff] Created tag perl-Array-Diff-0.07-7.el5
The lightweight tag 'perl-Array-Diff-0.07-7.el5' was created pointing to: 8287e81... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff] Created tag perl-Array-Diff-0.07-7.fc18
The lightweight tag 'perl-Array-Diff-0.07-7.fc18' was created pointing to: 8287e81... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff] (5 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into el6
Summary of changes: 4ddafe0... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Array-Diff (*) 53f1780... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) deda462... dist-git conversion (*) 432aea5... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) 48bf4c6... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff: 5/5] Merge branch 'master' into el6
commit 48bf4c6bd3a155ba28d62e5fc0f8e113b6de1a47 Merge: 432aea5 8287e81 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 15:54:44 2012 + Merge branch 'master' into el6 .gitignore |4 ++- perl-Array-Diff.spec | 74 + sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff/el5] (5 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into el6
Summary of changes: 4ddafe0... Initialize branch F-12 for perl-Array-Diff (*) 53f1780... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) deda462... dist-git conversion (*) 432aea5... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) 48bf4c6... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff/el6] (10 commits) ...Merge branch 'master' into el6
Summary of changes: e0898be... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*) c9b196c... Update to 0.07 release (*) 2fbd898... Bump epoch to ensure 0.07 is considered newer than 0.05002 (*) b5313f0... Bump release too because Fedora requires RPM binaries to be (*) f5302c1... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*) 01ab603... Perl mass rebuild (*) 12b719c... Perl mass rebuild (*) ba42f88... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) 8287e81... Spec clean-up (*) 48bf4c6... Merge branch 'master' into el6 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Array-Diff] Created tag perl-Array-Diff-0.07-7.el6
The lightweight tag 'perl-Array-Diff-0.07-7.el6' was created pointing to: 48bf4c6... Merge branch 'master' into el6 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 798235] perl-GStreamer-0.17 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798235 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-GStreamer-0.17-1.fc18 |perl-GStreamer-0.17-1.fc17 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-03-06 15:23:50 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 15:23:50 EST --- perl-GStreamer-0.17-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 798962] perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.007 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798962 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Glib-Object-Introspect ||ion-0.007-1.fc17 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-03-06 15:25:24 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 15:25:24 EST --- perl-Glib-Object-Introspection-0.007-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 798961] perl-Dancer-1.3093 is available
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=798961 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Dancer-1.3093-1.fc17 Resolution||ERRATA Last Closed||2012-03-06 15:39:32 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-06 15:39:32 EST --- perl-Dancer-1.3093-1.fc17 has been pushed to the Fedora 17 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse] Spec clean-up
commit 5e3161d81a72e76164e66d964fae610fec98d1ea Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 20:14:38 2012 + Spec clean-up - BR: perl(Carp) and perl(version) - Don't use macros for commands - Make %files list more explicit - Package example - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec | 29 + 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec b/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec index 4a73c7e..b5d5261 100644 --- a/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec +++ b/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@ Name: perl-Module-ExtractUse Version:0.24 -Release:1%{?dist} +Release:2%{?dist} Summary:Find out what modules are used License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ExtractUse/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Module/Module-ExtractUse-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) BuildRequires: perl(Parse::RecDescent) = 1.94 BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Strip) = 1.00 @@ -16,7 +17,8 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) BuildRequires: perl(UNIVERSAL::require) -Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) +BuildRequires: perl(version) +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) %description Module::ExtractUse is basically a Parse::RecDescent grammar to parse Perl @@ -27,16 +29,13 @@ from CPAN) used by the parsed code. %setup -q -n Module-ExtractUse-%{version} %build -%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor +perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor ./Build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - ./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0 -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; - -%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %check ./Build test @@ -46,15 +45,21 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc Changes README -%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Module +%doc Changes README example/ +%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ExtractUse.pm %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ExtractUse/ %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ExtractUse/Grammar.pm -%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm* +%{_mandir}/man3/Module::ExtractUse.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Mar 6 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.24-2 +- BR: perl(Carp) and perl(version) +- Don't use macros for commands +- Make %%files list more explicit +- Package example +- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 + * Mon Feb 13 2012 Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com - 0.24-1 - Update to 0.24, removing previous grammar hack (rhbz #789976) -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse/f17] Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: 5e3161d... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse/el6] (14 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: 21874ae... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) 4456391... - rebuild against perl 5.10.1 (*) ccdea86... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 7ddb186... - Mass rebuild with perl-5.12.0 (*) 5305630... dist-git conversion (*) 2d84645... - 661697 rebuild for fixing problems with vendorach/lib (*) 780164f... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_15_Mass (*) e8053ae... Reinstate %check (*) 9220ac1... Perl mass rebuild (*) a881c8e... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass (*) f4492af... Regenerate grammar for new Parse::RecDescent (rhbz#786849) (*) 671c144... Update to 0.24 (rhbz 789976) (*) b1e7c74... Merge branch 'el6' into el5 a97f7cb... Spec clean-up (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse/el6: 13/14] Merge branch 'el6' into el5
commit b1e7c74c589d88c38af7f76c4ed1a6457c8b422c Merge: 671c144 a5e4634 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 21:17:57 2012 + Merge branch 'el6' into el5 Conflicts: .gitignore .gitignore |5 + perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec | 34 +++--- sources |2 +- 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-) --- -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse/el6: 14/14] Spec clean-up
commit a97f7cb24656bbab33cae80e5e19575fd9eb58b2 Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org Date: Tue Mar 6 20:14:38 2012 + Spec clean-up - BR: perl(Carp) and perl(version) - Don't need to remove empty directories from buildroot - Don't use macros for commands - Explicitly run the Pod tests - Make %files list more explicit - Package example - Drop %defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 .gitignore |5 - perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec | 32 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 6fcbb75..aa4a9d9 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -1 +1,4 @@ -Module-ExtractUse-0.23.tar.gz +*.tar.gz +.build*.log +noarch/ +*.src.rpm diff --git a/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec b/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec index 8699db4..4c7a2d9 100644 --- a/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec +++ b/perl-Module-ExtractUse.spec @@ -1,13 +1,14 @@ Name: perl-Module-ExtractUse Version:0.23 -Release:3%{?dist} +Release:4%{?dist} Summary:Find out what modules are used License:GPL+ or Artistic Group: Development/Libraries URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-ExtractUse/ Source0: http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Module/Module-ExtractUse-%{version}.tar.gz -BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) +BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu) BuildArch: noarch +BuildRequires: perl(Carp) BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build) BuildRequires: perl(Parse::RecDescent) = 1.94 BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Strip) = 1.00 @@ -16,7 +17,8 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::NoWarnings) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) BuildRequires: perl(UNIVERSAL::require) -Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo $version)) +BuildRequires: perl(version) +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version)) %description Module::ExtractUse is basically a Parse::RecDescent grammar to parse Perl @@ -27,33 +29,39 @@ from CPAN) used by the parsed code. %setup -q -n Module-ExtractUse-%{version} %build -%{__perl} Build.PL installdirs=vendor +perl Build.PL installdirs=vendor ./Build %install rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT - ./Build install destdir=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT create_packlist=0 -find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \; - -%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/* +%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %check ./Build test +./Build test --test_files=xt/*.t %clean rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT %files -%defattr(-,root,root,-) -%doc Changes README TODO -%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Module +%doc Changes README TODO example/ +%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ExtractUse.pm %dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ExtractUse/ %{perl_vendorlib}/Module/ExtractUse/Grammar.pm -%{_mandir}/man3/*.3pm* +%{_mandir}/man3/Module::ExtractUse.3pm* %changelog +* Tue Mar 6 2012 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.23-4 +- BR: perl(Carp) and perl(version) +- Don't need to remove empty directories from buildroot +- Don't use macros for commands +- Explicitly run the Pod tests +- Make %%files list more explicit +- Package example +- Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4 + * Sun Jul 26 2009 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.23-3 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse/el5] (5 commits) ...Spec clean-up
Summary of changes: 7c6ac81... Fix typo that causes a failure to update the common directo (*) c60a88b... Initialize branch EL-6 for perl-Module-ExtractUse (*) a5e4634... dist-git conversion (*) b1e7c74... Merge branch 'el6' into el5 (*) a97f7cb... Spec clean-up (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse] Created tag perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.23-4.el6
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.23-4.el6' was created pointing to: a97f7cb... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse] Created tag perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.24-2.fc17
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.24-2.fc17' was created pointing to: 5e3161d... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-ExtractUse] Created tag perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.24-2.fc18
The lightweight tag 'perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.24-2.fc18' was created pointing to: 5e3161d... Spec clean-up -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 247250] Conflicting Provides
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=247250 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org 2012-03-07 02:22:10 EST --- Package mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc17: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 17 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc17' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-3185/mod_perl-2.0.5-8.fc17 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[389-devel] please review additional change to ticket 302 - use thread local storage for modifiersname/creatorsname
Config needs to ignore the new attributes... https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/302 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/302/0001-Config-changes-fail-because-of-unknown-attribute-int.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel