Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
Hey, On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:21:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. GNOME Boxes failed to build because of libvirt-client is a BuildRequires, and this package cannot be installed because of recent netcat changes in rawhide. Should we work on getting a working GNOME Boxes rebuild as soon as possible, or can it wait until the next release (which is due in a few weeks)? Christophe pgpkgk5W6Wr6z.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that > > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up > > in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives > > a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we > > will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > > > > This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over > > when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. > > please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > > reporting. > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > > kevin > ___ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce The D compiler ldc is successful rebuild now. The build failed because ldc use LLVM and now we have LLVM 3.1 \o/ -- Bioinfornatics at fedoraproject dot org - Fedora Packager - package own: ldc, phobos, druntime, gtkd, derelict, gl3n, gljm -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Christophe Fergeau wrote: > Hey, > > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:21:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they >> should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. >> >> 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. >> 656 packages failed to rebuild. >> >> Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > > GNOME Boxes failed to build because of libvirt-client is a BuildRequires, > and this package cannot be installed because of recent netcat changes in > rawhide. Should we work on getting a working GNOME Boxes rebuild as soon as > possible, or can it wait until the next release (which is due in a few > weeks)? If there's a fix in the works I would suggest just waiting, as long as it's fixed and is being tracked it shouldn't be too much of a problem. It's the couple of hundred other packages that are long term FTBFS that really need their maintainers to apply attention :) Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Giving up on nvi [Was: Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete]
On 22/07/12 22:21, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Ownership in pkgdb released. Breaks on missing DB 3 support (although it seems to be patched around, so that the package builds locally with db4), but I have neither time nor will to try to figure it out. It was mostly joke to package it, and I don't want to carry it on, if it is going to develop into real work. Best, Matěj -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On 07/22/2012 10:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Fixed and rebuilt libsolv: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4322484 Ales -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
- Original Message - > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 > > that > > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix > > up > > in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only > > gives > > a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we > > will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > > > > This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved > > over > > when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. > > please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > > reporting. > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, > they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. qtcurve-kde4 currently blocked by bug 831958, kde 4.8.90+ api changes, upstream restored some parts of old api but seems not all, looking on the issue. I'm not sure we want to maintain contextkit and libqttracker anymore, any users? Or someone who would like to take care about it? It's the leftover after MeeGo fail (but there's still Mer and new stuff built on top of it). R. > kevin > > ___ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012 21:28:28 +0100 > Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 >> > Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> > >> >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 >> >> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix >> >> up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that >> >> only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on >> >> 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 >> >> >> >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved >> >> over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure >> >> stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the >> >> reporting. >> > >> > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, >> > they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. >> > >> > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. >> > 656 packages failed to rebuild. >> > >> > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. >> >> Is there a page with a list of the failed packages against owners? > > Yep: http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html drago01 (1): hardinfo -> fixed -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting. The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild. Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild? -- / Alexander Bokovoy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit : > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that > > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up > > in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives > > a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we > > will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > > > > This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over > > when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. > > please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > > reporting. > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > > kevin > ___ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce The D compiler ldc is successful rebuild now. The build failed because ldc use LLVM and now we have LLVM 3.1 \o/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained] Update to 0.16
commit fd549c4a855cb0aeef04e2fa15baf6e418e36259
Author: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Mon Jul 23 13:46:44 2012 +0200
Update to 0.16
.gitignore|1 +
perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained.spec |9 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 9f71ba2..646914e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@ MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.11.tar.gz
/MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.13.tar.gz
/MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.14.tar.gz
/MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.15.tar.gz
+/MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.16.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained.spec
b/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained.spec
index f000f76..f7adc13 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained
-Version:0.15
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.16
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:DateTime related constraints and coercions for Moose
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Moose) >= 0.41
BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types) >= 0.30
BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types::Moose) >= 0.30
BuildRequires: perl(namespace::autoclean)
-BuildRequires: perl(Olson::Abbreviations)
+BuildRequires: perl(Olson::Abbreviations) >= 0.03
# Tests only
BuildRequires: perl(Locale::Maketext)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)
@@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Mon Jul 23 2012 Jitka Plesnikova - 0.16-1
+- 0.16 bump
+
* Fri Jul 20 2012 Fedora Release Engineering
- 0.15-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index b54cc86..90c75bd 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-3934fd87da0c8eeb21447884d4711541
MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.15.tar.gz
+15e58596437a9bc7e9bf643620ad5caf
MooseX-Types-DateTime-ButMaintained-0.16.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 842084] perl-Text-VimColor-0.18 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842084 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Text-VimColor-0.18-1.f ||c18 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2012-07-23 07:47:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
Dne 22.7.2012 22:21, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 Dennis Gilmore wrote: it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the reporting. The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. 656 packages failed to rebuild. ruby rubygem-eventmachine rubygem-net-scp rubygem-oauth rubygem-delayed_job rubygem-tilt Rebuilt. Vit -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:07:30AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 07/19/2012 05:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >When a libvirt client connects to a remote machine, the libvirt client > >sends the "nc -U ..." command over ssh. So every libvirt on any > >distro that might connect to a Rawhide libvirtd must be changed to > >send a "socat ..." command instead. > > Alternatively, perhaps a compatibility script called 'nc' could > execute the appropriate socat command? That sounds like an acceptable temporary solution until ncat supports UNIX sockets too. -P pgppvKy0sWsSP.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:14:42 +0300 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > >Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 > >> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix > >> up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that > >> only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on > >> 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > >> > >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved > >> over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure > >> stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > >> reporting. > > > >The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, > >they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > > >11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > >656 packages failed to rebuild. > > > >Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. > Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild? Odd. I don't know why it wasn't included... Dennis is traveling today, but he can check scripts tomorrow and see what happened. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that >> we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up >> in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives >> a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we >> will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 >> >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over >> when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. >> please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the >> reporting. > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Fixed libmng. Still working on gnome-phone-manager. -J > kevin > > ___ > devel-announce mailing list > devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:14:42 +0300 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 >Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 >> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix >> up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that >> only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on >> 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 >> >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved >> over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure >> stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the >> reporting. > >The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, >they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > >11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. >656 packages failed to rebuild. > >Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild? Odd. I don't know why it wasn't included... Dennis is traveling today, but he can check scripts tomorrow and see what happened. I'm working on a rebuild myself, as adopting to samba4 beta4 will require small patch (thus I was surprised to not see failure). -- / Alexander Bokovoy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 14:14:42 +0300 Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 >Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 >> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix >> up in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that >> only gives a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on >> 2012-08-07 we will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 >> >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved >> over when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure >> stats. please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the >> reporting. > >The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, >they should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > >11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. >656 packages failed to rebuild. > >Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild? Odd. I don't know why it wasn't included... Dennis is traveling today, but he can check scripts tomorrow and see what happened. I made a rebuild for freeipa. However, please do check if any other package was missed as well. -- / Alexander Bokovoy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:14:42PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > >Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > >>it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that > >>we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > >>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > >>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up > >>in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives > >>a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we > >>will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > >> > >>This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over > >>when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. > >>please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > >>reporting. > > > >The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > >should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > > >11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > >656 packages failed to rebuild. > > > >Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. > Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild? If a build has been submitted for freeipa "since koji changes went live" (whatever that means) then the scripts wouldn't have submitted another one. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild#Build_Initiation and: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11554 (looks like freeipa has been built twice since the beginning of July). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 02:14:42PM +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 >Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >>it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that >>we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up >>in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives >>a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we >>will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 >> >>This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over >>when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. >>please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the >>reporting. > >The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they >should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > >11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. >656 packages failed to rebuild. > >Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. It looks like freeipa was not rebuilt and neither appears in failures. Is there any reason why it wasn't rebuild? If a build has been submitted for freeipa "since koji changes went live" (whatever that means) then the scripts wouldn't have submitted another one. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_18_Mass_Rebuild#Build_Initiation and: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=11554 (looks like freeipa has been built twice since the beginning of July). The second rebuild is what I just did today. From my reading of the rebuild ticket anything built before 2012-07-09 was supposed to be rebuild. -- / Alexander Bokovoy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On 07/23/2012 03:47 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 4:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. These are fixed: - hydrogen - lash This one did not have any problems. Just a plain rebuild "fixed" it: - clementine This one seems like a bug in doxygen, rather than a bug in the package: - slv2 [1] Apparently doxygen-1.8.1.1 generates a manpage file with a weird filename: /usr/share/man/man3/_builddir_build_BUILD_slv2-0.6.6_slv2_.3.gz I also see that the same problem exists in a few other packages, e.g. sord [2], suil [3]. I imagine there are other ones suffering the same issue. Downgrading to doxygen-1.8.0-1.fc18 eliminates the problem. Does anyone have a solution/workaround for this bug? Hmmm, it seems to be generating a (new) index file which contains a reference to the header file and nothing else. Removing prior to the install step seems to be enough an easy enough fix, but there is probably a better way that we can send upstream Brendan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Heads up: nc replaced by nmap ncat
Hey, On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 04:03:00PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 11:07:30AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > On 07/19/2012 05:46 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > >When a libvirt client connects to a remote machine, the libvirt client > > >sends the "nc -U ..." command over ssh. So every libvirt on any > > >distro that might connect to a Rawhide libvirtd must be changed to > > >send a "socat ..." command instead. > > > > Alternatively, perhaps a compatibility script called 'nc' could > > execute the appropriate socat command? > > That sounds like an acceptable temporary solution until ncat > supports UNIX sockets too. For what it's worth, I think this change broke GNOME Boxes build: http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/36/4270036/root.log DEBUG util.py:257: Error: Package: libvirt-client-0.9.13-1.fc18.i686 (build) DEBUG util.py:257: Requires: nc and I indeed get: $ repoquery --releasever=rawhide --whatprovides nc No package provides nc libvirt.spec has: %package client # So remote clients can access libvirt over SSH tunnel # (client invokes 'nc' against the UNIX socket on the server) Requires: nc Christophe pgpkwUD78oTIP.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Licence change for vollkorn-fonts
I've just picked up the recently orphaned vollkorn-fonts. A new (May 2010!) release is available, and the licence has changed from CC-BY to OFL. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
Kevin Fenzi wrote: Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. I orphaned gtkpod. Hopefully chkr can pick that up. He's been effectively maintaining it for a while now. I don't use an iPod or Apple stuff anymore, so I have no need for gtkpod and nor time and ability to test it. -- ToddOpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~ Plagiarism is copying from one source; research is copying from two or more. pgpT8o5fev4Vp.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On 07/22/2012 09:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that >> we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up >> in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives >> a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we >> will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 >> >> This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over >> when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. >> please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the >> reporting. > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. I've fixed and rebuilt python-sqlalchemy0.7 cheers, Pádraig. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, 2012-07-22 at 14:33 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Yep: http://fedorapeople.org/~ausil/f18-failures.html I've fixed diffutils and built it. Tim. */ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
wyrd/ocaml problem (was: Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete)
Hi, can someone tell me what is wrong with wyrd? build.log says (http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8809/4318809/build.log): | ocaml version is 4.00.0+beta2 | ocaml library path is /usr/lib/ocaml | configure: error: Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater. The configure scripts uses the following code: 1781 # we extract Ocaml version number and library path 1782 OCAMLVERSION=`$OCAMLC -v | sed -n -e 's|.*version *\(.*\)$|\1|p' ` 1783 echo "ocaml version is $OCAMLVERSION" 1784 OCAMLLIB=`$OCAMLC -v | tail -n 1 | cut -f 4 -d " "` 1785 echo "ocaml library path is $OCAMLLIB" 1786 1787 1788 # check for sufficient OCAMLVERSION 1789 OCAMLMAJORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 1` 1790 OCAMLMINORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 2` 1791 if test $OCAMLMAJORVERSION -lt 3 ; then 1792as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." "$LINENO" 5 1793 else 1794if test $OCAMLMINORVERSION -lt 8 ; then 1795 as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." "$LINENO" 5 1796fi 1797 fi As far as I can see it should test in line 1791 whether 4 is less than 3, which is not the case and therefore it should not fail. If you know how to fix this, you are welcome to fix it directly in the git repo. :-) Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 02:21:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500 > Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that > > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCompressor and > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/MiniDebugInfo due to a mix up > > in dates it was going to start on 2012-07-30 but since that only gives > > a week to do the rebuild before branching for f18 on 2012-08-07 we > > will be starting the mass rebuild on 2012-07-18 > > > > This is a heads up that it will be done in a side tag and moved over > > when completed. We will be running scripts to output failure stats. > > please be sure to let releng know if you see any bugs in the > > reporting. > > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose. > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt. > 656 packages failed to rebuild. > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. > > kevin Fixed and built so far (automake issues): fcoe-utils libhbaapi libhbalinux lldpad -P pgpvDgM0PLeX2.pgp Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: wyrd/ocaml problem (was: Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete)
On Mon, 23 Jul 2012 19:01:48 +0200, Till Maas wrote: > Hi, > > can someone tell me what is wrong with wyrd? > > build.log says > (http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8809/4318809/build.log): > | ocaml version is 4.00.0+beta2 > | ocaml library path is /usr/lib/ocaml > | configure: error: Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater. > > > The configure scripts uses the following code: > > 1781 # we extract Ocaml version number and library path > 1782 OCAMLVERSION=`$OCAMLC -v | sed -n -e 's|.*version *\(.*\)$|\1|p' ` > 1783 echo "ocaml version is $OCAMLVERSION" > 1784 OCAMLLIB=`$OCAMLC -v | tail -n 1 | cut -f 4 -d " "` > 1785 echo "ocaml library path is $OCAMLLIB" > 1786 > 1787 > 1788 # check for sufficient OCAMLVERSION > 1789 OCAMLMAJORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 1` > 1790 OCAMLMINORVERSION=`echo $OCAMLVERSION | cut -d '.' -f 2` > 1791 if test $OCAMLMAJORVERSION -lt 3 ; then > 1792as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." > "$LINENO" 5 > 1793 else > 1794if test $OCAMLMINORVERSION -lt 8 ; then > 1795 as_fn_error "Wyrd requires OCaml version 3.08 or greater." > "$LINENO" 5 > 1796fi > 1797 fi > > As far as I can see it should test in line 1791 whether 4 is less than > 3, which is not the case and therefore it should not fail. > > If you know how to fix this, you are welcome to fix it directly in the > git repo. :-) Hint: Focus on line 1794. -- Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.4.6-2.fc17.x86_64 loadavg: 0.07 0.15 0.11 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: PyXML package - deprecate it?
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > I can see several ways forward -- > > * Deprecate pyxml as you were thinking of doing > * Locally patch the python stdlib to not replace its implementation of > xml with pyxml's. I don't know if upstream python will take that as > python-2.7 is in maintainance mode but they may as it's somewhat > agreed that this importing of pyxml is not kosher in upstream (and has > been removed in python-3.x) Some followup. I've made a page for removing pyxml: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/Remove_PyXML dmalcolm added the dep tree. I remember that fedora-business-card is a false dep from when this came up in February. I'll remove the dep shortly. Since SOAPpy affects so much stuff I had a look. It seems like the dep is false there as well. The README says that PyXML is needed but inspection of the code and the ChangeLog, ReleaseNotes, and the upstream scm point to that being a documentation bug; PyXML requirement was supposedly removed in 2003. -Toshio -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Unsubscribe remove delete
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Accidental soname bump in libdbi
Last night I updated libdbi from 0.8.3 to 0.8.4, without paying much attention since a tarball diff showed that upstream hadn't done anything except update the configure script and supporting files. However, this morning the broken-deps script whinged about it. Looking more closely, it appears that the new script causes it to build "libdbi.so.1.0.0" instead of "libdbi.so.0.0.0". Given that the upstream major version number has not changed, it seems to me this is bogus and the package should continue to use "0" as the soname major version. So I'll fix that later today. If you got a broken-deps gripe for one of the dependent packages, please *do not* rebuild. apologies, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Accidental soname bump in libdbi
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Last night I updated libdbi from 0.8.3 to 0.8.4, without paying much > attention since a tarball diff showed that upstream hadn't done anything > except update the configure script and supporting files. However, this > morning the broken-deps script whinged about it. Looking more closely, > it appears that the new script causes it to build "libdbi.so.1.0.0" > instead of "libdbi.so.0.0.0". Given that the upstream major version > number has not changed, it seems to me this is bogus and the package > should continue to use "0" as the soname major version. > > So I'll fix that later today. If you got a broken-deps gripe for one > of the dependent packages, please *do not* rebuild. Whoops, just did Io-language. Let me know when it's fixed, and I'll re-rebuild. -J > apologies, tom lane > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- http://cecinestpasunefromage.wordpress.com/ in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-07-23)
=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-07-23) === Meeting started by jwb at 17:01:18 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-07-23/fesco.2012-07-23-17.01.log.html . Meeting summary --- * init process (jwb, 17:01:31) * #892 F18 Feature: GNOME IBus Integration - (jwb, 17:03:03) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GNOMEIBusIntegration (jwb, 17:03:03) * AGREED: GNOME IBus integration feature is approved (7, 0, 0) (jwb, 17:04:23) * #898 F18 Feature: Package Service Presets - (jwb, 17:05:37) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets (jwb, 17:05:37) * AGREED: feature Package Service Presets is approved (+: 5, -: 1 (mitr) 0:0) (jwb, 17:12:59) * #883 F18 Feature: Display Manager Infrastructure Rework - (jwb, 17:13:12) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DisplayManagerRework (jwb, 17:13:12) * AGREED: feature Display Manager Rewrk is approved (+: 7, -: 0, 0: 0) (jwb, 17:14:03) * #909 F18 Feature: Heat - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Heat (jwb, 17:14:08) * AGREED: feature Heat is approved (+: 6, -: 1 (t8m), 0: 0) (jwb, 17:20:05) * the Heat team might want to look at using something other than python-crypto (jwb, 17:20:45) * #910 F18 Feature: Network Team driver - (jwb, 17:21:37) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/TeamDriver (jwb, 17:21:37) * AGREED: feature Network Team driver is approved (+: 9, -: 0 , 0: 0) (jwb, 17:23:41) * #902 F18 Feature: IPython 0.13 - (jwb, 17:23:53) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/IPython_0.13 (jwb, 17:23:54) * AGREED: feature IPython 0.13 is approved (+: 9, -: 0 , 0: 0) (jwb, 17:25:24) * #903 F18 Feature: Riak - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Riak (jwb, 17:25:32) * AGREED: feature Riak is approved (+: 9, -: 0 , 0: 0) (jwb, 17:27:48) * #904 F18 Feature: Syscall Filters - (jwb, 17:27:53) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Syscall_Filters (jwb, 17:27:53) * AGREED: feature Syscall Filters is approved (+: 9, -: 0 , 0: (jwb, 17:29:08) * #888 F18 Feature: UEFI Secure Boot - (jwb, 17:29:30) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SecureBoot (jwb, 17:29:31) * AGREED: feature UEFI Secure Boot is approved (+:7, -:0 , 0:2 (t8m, mmaslano) ) (jwb, 17:37:25) * #897 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AvahiDefaultOnDesktop (jwb, 17:38:20) * AGREED: feature AvahiDefaultOnDesktop is approved (+:7, -:0 , 0:2 (jwb, pjones) ) (jwb, 17:52:17) * FESCo to follow up with twoerner on the opening of the port aspect (jwb, 17:52:36) * #899 F18 Feature: Virt Guest Suspend/Hibernate support - (jwb, 17:52:59) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Virt_Guest_Suspend_Hibernate (jwb, 17:53:00) * AGREED: feature Virt Guest Suspend/Hibernate support is approved (+:9, -:0 , 0:0) (jwb, 17:56:02) * #900 F18 Feature: Virt Live Snapshots - (jwb, 17:56:07) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Virt_Live_Snapshots (jwb, 17:56:08) * AGREED: feature Virt Live Snapshots is approved (+:9, -:0 , 0:0) (jwb, 17:57:25) * #905 F18 Feature: System Storage Manager - (jwb, 17:58:25) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemStorageManager (jwb, 17:58:25) * AGREED: feature SystemStorageManager is approved (+:9, -:0 , 0:0) (jwb, 17:59:36) * #906 F18 Feature: firewalld - default firewall solution - (jwb, 17:59:42) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/firewalld-default (jwb, 17:59:43) * AGREED: feature firewalld - default firewall solution is approved (+:9, -:0 , 0:0) (jwb, 18:01:26) * #907 F18 Feature: Features/Liberation Fonts 2 - (jwb, 18:01:34) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Liberation_Fonts_2 (jwb, 18:01:34) * AGREED: feature Liberation Fonts 2 is approved (+:9, -:0 , 0:0) (jwb, 18:02:57) * #908 F18 Feature: Fontconfig Enable Autohinting - (jwb, 18:03:02) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FontconfigEnableAutohinting (jwb, 18:03:03) * AGREED: feature Fontconfig Enable Autohinting is approved (+:9, -:0 , 0:0) (jwb, 18:06:07) * #879 rishi: requesting provenpackager (jwb, 18:06:31) * AGREED: rishi is accepted as a provenpackager (jwb, 18:07:51) * #881 jcwillia: request for provenpackager status (jwb, 18:07:59) * REJECTED: jcwillia for provenpackager. would like to see more rationale and further packaging experience (jwb, 18:10:24) * #901 provenpackager request for itamarjp (jwb, 18:10:56) * REJECTED: itamarjp for provenpackager. would like to see more involvment on the packages maintained (jwb, 18:12:46) * mmaslano will chair next week's meeting (jwb, 18:15:22) * Tomrrow, 2012-07-24 is the Feature Submission Deadline (jwb, 18:16:06) * Open Floor (j
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
On 07/22/2012 11:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild. Fixed: vpaan (1): curlpp -- Veeti P. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2012-07-23)
On 07/23/2012 06:56 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-07-23) === Meeting started by jwb at 17:01:18 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2012-07-23/fesco.2012-07-23-17.01.log.html . * #898 F18 Feature: Package Service Presets - (jwb, 17:05:37) * LINK: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/PackagePresets (jwb, 17:05:37) * AGREED: feature Package Service Presets is approved (+: 5, -: 1 (mitr) 0:0) (jwb, 17:12:59) So you guys actually agreed to this without this A) being implemented for all service related packages within one release cycle B) Done after we have migrated all units thus allowing this to wind up being half implement and at the same time deny me the request of cleaning up existing units in the distribution you guys amaze me some might even come to the conclusion that Red Hat employees get special treatment within FESCO... * #897 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/AvahiDefaultOnDesktop (jwb, 17:38:20) * AGREED: feature AvahiDefaultOnDesktop is approved (+:7, -:0 , 0:2 (jwb, pjones) ) (jwb, 17:52:17) * FESCo to follow up with twoerner on the opening of the port aspect (jwb, 17:52:36) I assume that this will get tied to the desktop.target only and all avahi aware service ( samba/vsftp/nfs etc ) will be fixed and probably integrated in the process? JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Accidental soname bump in libdbi
Jon Ciesla writes: > On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So I'll fix that later today. If you got a broken-deps gripe for one >> of the dependent packages, please *do not* rebuild. > Whoops, just did Io-language. Let me know when it's fixed, and I'll > re-rebuild. Done in libdbi-0.8.4-2, which looks like it's in the rawhide buildroot now. Sorry again for the wasted effort. regards, tom lane -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: wyrd/ocaml problem (was: Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete)
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 08:03:42PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > Hint: Focus on line 1794. Thank you, I somehow read it as it was meant. :-( Regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Any ETA for OpenCL support in Mesa?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 00:00:46 GMT, David Airlie wrote: > I made a first pass at packaging it and starting feeling ill at the pain, I got stuck there too trying to get it built from checkouts. > the big problem was pacakging libclc, its horribly developed, got what I think > is a handwritten build system in python (or a port of one), requires a fair > few patches to even get close to being useful. I see it's an LLVM project. I may be able to do something at work to get it to use CMake and work inside of the LLVM build at least (assuming upstream is amenable to that[1]) since we're looking at using OpenCL stuff anyways and we're trying to make sure things work on more than the 2 or 3 machines that have successfully run things so far. - --Ben [1]It appears as if that should be the case, seeing as Peter Collingbourne is one of the developers of the Ninja generator for CMake[2] and also committed the current build system[3]. [2]http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/CMakeChangeLog-2.8.8 [3]http://www.pcc.me.uk/pipermail/libclc-dev/2011-October/06.html -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQDdSaAAoJEKaxavVX4C1XLAMP+wbrKAVxcjv5jhu21X6AesUD XF6mpEaWHSq/5YyFb6vGK/VCgMWkXB28jBYmqHC2wNpKs62Mui9xMpDakyzsOyXO 1eb61rXdTZ7PBhi8GOdGaFctHtpbW2hIAWALela7ZGxcny7GFCqD0Hu+/BckiVvY Co+Xau4ZKSR/1peZsO0wWtx5k1W6W+6qnlDSskgwVSnXqA5oHr1BkX3ZMlsnJRlm oGROLCIem7loaaIdrUtaKfr0U02k/44d8T5Hg24zevB6gnTlHN7teMILhG/SrLy+ kfoHF7FEvpixrlUb3wFVrCk7GVFsK+eIhWzD29ioIxlFCtCVRkmLE5+e3oTj6noi cWp10cZjxGi41zqJ1VAPKM4w9WSixbvnckP1WkdTNGZJUaQFwcxhw3idOdAYMMtN Y/veKMJCeIGDBq5h6hXw4ymAVkftFCtX7W5bon3v+V8Lac8GzqNRDu6tkQ/EAWL7 z5Ci2n/04K5TtNzDRjUcEfRbng4mqNOezjWRQTp+qWui+ZSb2EDHFO1mX4IEP4BC sPn9Q7yz8IkHZmeQB86cdRejYPx66yogtPm2nAHxDE0vm3RqDSy5twLJCDpe5bs+ HxLlybNSLfOFrKRV2NIErBiVzn75/3Yujx/nZHDiUbMjk2rM7Q0Ey3HP/U2mJPGo HeUvI3O9gJp8tkRdzG8/ =URM+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Mass rebuild for Fedora 18 Complete
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 20:21:10 GMT, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > The mass rebuild has completed and been tagged back into rawhide, they > should appear in tomorrow's rawhide compose.=20 > > 11057 packages were successfully rebuilt.=20 > 656 packages failed to rebuild.=20 > > Please fix any packages you maintain that failed to rebuild.=20 ghc-vector-space ghc-xss-sanitize Updated without looking at new deps. RRs filed[1][2]. vifm Rebuilt. - --Ben [1]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838771 [2]https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=838775 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJQDfvDAAoJEKaxavVX4C1XEP0QAOUoZ39tUTgE3ywQtmQxSbla 8sYtdOH6eW9McM4qRkri+z8R+E+bUV4mP14lSgzfG1tN03EluFkSsy5uK9TrdOPj 12504l97+r0B5YEk0Pf8fAYeYXKmRqz33DHEdKmFT15Dh+n8rKvZIN3OLSwCZb2e 6a6g8gr0u/fANQ1817zjUVa3bDYrgGxyaLtB6cJwDE8/MWBk9uxWNQgW5w4lGTXj FYcYclfnGCKspOdTP4LE3zJ0Hlqv2+LUZ1esbzzhmIskPQKOrsge7NRjnRRfi87S 05yDawxzXcAjSHqd2qsAL+Ok72KfNCWua6S0Yt0CWrIs4Ak3KKyjeT8yDXonQLAK P/MH2KUgatXItqEWrLl1kRJoExCJndlQQdApzbRqrWwlIr/G3LW6cLRHeugdf2ch nIZtHMgzxDDOOtMJqNg8TycPYIu2Nn0nl1F2TP01uB4kcR9AvKzzOqPhZrBqjsjC sBII2kefkwXl8YUSFE/fLrIbG8Q+6lrtsgP3zq0ReZLqjFvF3rR4HWOyNtJNvvCC xoAl80+VFcQulprg0eLQ7J7kY398qP7NUGDcuUyH3FH9a1UKe/aWP2X8aYQ0GbGG tg/UaFmYVJF/4iATRAc2S/NOzNpWaRHpIl2U+Aqe0hC3plArQUtHE5X3o/WnCkEh Gwsh/gKxlRP6dTIZjRfk =pQQT -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Ubuntu Unity has been ported to Fedora 17
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 08:05:25PM +0100, Nelson Marques wrote: > > It would be better to think of this as a starting point for porting > > and to work out the packaging issue instead of an enduser consumable. > > Porting Unity outside of Ubuntu is not going to be easy for anyone. > > There's a reason why its not in Debian yet at all. > > Jeff, > > The GNOME:Ayatana repo was actually started by me somewhere in 2010; > My original goal was to test the port and improve my packaging. Since > the early days that Vincent Untz had made clear that it could never be > merged with mainline openSUSE because of unacceptable patches: > > 1) The GTK stack required a lot of patching, which had been mainly > refused by upstream; Most likely GTK+ upstream knows better this issue > than me. I haven't contacted them, not even Federico. This patches > includes the 'Menu Proxy' patches and others. To build Unity (openSUSE > back then) at least 4 patches on GTK+ were required; > > 2) XInput2 had to be supported also which involved a few more crazy > hacks on Xorg stack (at least if I remember correctly); Unity these days relies (afaik) on the released upstream version of XI 2.2 and is thus compatible with the server 1.12 we ship in F17. Cheers, Peter > 3) Back in the day, ATI binaries (I use Intel nowadays, but back then > was running ATI with fglrx) were fixed in Ubuntu the rest of the > people were left to dry in the desert; So I never could really test it > properly. > > 4) Back then GDM was also hacked, but this was related to backport > sessions features from GDM2 to GDM2; > > 5) GNOME session required to be hacked because Canonical had changed > a lot, so in order for the indicators to shutdown the system and > reboot the system, you needed to patch gnome-session. > > A lot of patching not accepted upstream was required back then. I have > then left the repository behind and ignored it for quite long as the > number packages was really increasing a lot (around 50 packages, many > of them hacked). I've ditched it as it was requesting too much from > me, and I couldn't handle it alone. > > I've added a few maintainers that requested it and removed myself from > the repo maintainership; The main reason was because the repo will > become totally un-usable as it is now for any distro... I've stopped > working on it mainly because of the kind of things people are doing > now, crazy hacks (in my opinion it will lead to chaotic maintaining > issues). > > > > > The contents of this particular repo are entirely unacceptable for > > submission into mainline Fedora. And that's fine..its an experimental > > repository. > > If the people working inside the repo are serious about moving forward > > further with the porting work and are interesting in getting the > > packaging fixed so its compliant I'm willing to help them with package > > reviews and recommendations on how to come into compliance with our > > policies. > > Are you ready to accept patches on GTK+ and potentially on Xorg that > were declined from upstream? This should be your initial thoughts! > > > At a minimum they'll have to figure out how to deal with vendor > > patchsets against the gnome packages. Either dropping the patches > > entirely and relying on stock gnome as we ship it.. or forking the > > gnome components and renaming them for Unity to require in such a way > > that a system can have both the unity stack and the gnome stack > > installed in parallel without conflict. > > Forking anything will lead this to nearly unmaintainable unless you > have someone working fulltime on it ;) > > All the previous are my personal comments; Though I don't really care > about this issue, I don't believe much has changed on how Canonical > does it's stuff. I wish all the best to the maintainers, because I > have really a nice idea on the pain such project is going to give :) > > NM > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Intent to retire: axis2c
The axis2c package doesn't build against httpd 2.4, and since it is effectively subsumed by one of wso2-wsf-cpp's sub-packages, wso2-axis2, I think it would be better to just retire it. Nothing appears to depend on that package, but if someone wants to take it for some reason then please let me know so I can release ownership. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
