Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 12:58 -0600, Daniel Drake wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: xorg-x11-drv-geode geode is used on the OLPC XO-1 and is maintained by Daniel Drake (dsd) and he's basically done all recent commits for upstream releases and fixes unless it's been something like an ABI rebuild or similar. I'm sure he'll take over the maintainership if needed. Yes, I will take that one. Thanks for looking after it over the years. No problem. I'm happy to continue doing drive-by rebuilds for the things we end up keeping, I'm just trying to make sure that what we keep reflects how Fedora is used. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
From: mj...@srcf.ucam.org On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:54:46PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution Only if you want to drop VESA support. Please don't drop that. I have a large install base of SBCs using geode and some on savage and s3virge IIRC. I need at least the VESA fallback, although I suspect that may not suffice in some cases. -- John Florian -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Orphaning ne7ssh
Hi. I'll orphan ne7ssh https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/ne7ssh library. It is FBFS after last botan update. Upstream did not answer on my report (only via web-form). As I also do not use it in my development now I do not want spent time to even try porting it. -- With best wishes, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus). For fast contact with me use jabber: hubbi...@jabber.ru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring long-term FTBFS packages for Fedora 20 v2
I retired the following packages that were reported earlier recently: curry eclipse-phpeclipse fedora-package-config-smart mod_mono nautilus-sendto-trac open-cobol petitboot simulavr smart tiobench The following packages are did not build for two releases and will be retired before the Alpha Change Deadline 2013-09-03, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Please retire packages first for Fedora 20 and then in Rawhide. Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Package (co)maintainers = arm4 grandcross, limb gstreamer-java lfarkas pure-gen salimma tqsllib lucilanga xfce4-websearch-plugin cwickert The following packages require above mentioned packages: Depending on: arm4 python-arm4 (maintained by: grandcross) python-arm4-1.2-8.fc20.i686 requires arm4 = 0.8.2-11.fc18, libarm4.so.1 python-arm4-1.2-8.fc20.src requires arm4-devel = 0.8.2-11.fc18 Depending on: tqsllib trustedqsl (maintained by: lucilanga) trustedqsl-1.13-6.fc20.i686 requires libtqsllib.so.1, tqsllib = 2.2-3.fc18 trustedqsl-1.13-6.fc20.src requires tqsllib-devel = 2.2-3.fc18 cqrlog (maintained by: sparks) cqrlog-1.5.8-5.fc20.i686 requires trustedqsl = 1.13-6.fc20 Affected (co)maintainers cwickert: xfce4-websearch-plugin grandcross: arm4 lfarkas: gstreamer-java limb: arm4 lucilanga: tqsllib salimma: pure-gen sparks: tqsllib The script creating this output is run and developed by Fedora Release Engineering. Please report issues at its trac instance: https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ The sources of this script can be found at: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: [libntlm/f19: 2/3] New version with cleanup.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Its not okay to use Author: Koji k...@fedoraproject.org as your git
config. please fix it immediately to use your real name and email
Dennis
On Mon, 26 Aug 2013 03:07:35 + (UTC)
Christopher Meng ci...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
commit dee12b4f18564a2bfd99d5f93457b7f84a49aea7
Author: Koji k...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Mon Aug 26 11:05:47 2013 +0800
New version with cleanup.
.gitignore |1 +
libntlm.spec | 53
+ sources
|2 +- 3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3faa576..37dc8fb 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
libntlm-1.2.tar.gz
/libntlm-1.3.tar.gz
+/libntlm-1.4.tar.gz
diff --git a/libntlm.spec b/libntlm.spec
index 951a3d7..ca0c7ae 100644
--- a/libntlm.spec
+++ b/libntlm.spec
@@ -1,15 +1,12 @@
Name: libntlm
-Version:1.3
-Release:5%{?dist}
-Summary:NTLM authentication library
-
-Group: System Environment/Libraries
+Version:1.4
+Release:1%{?dist}
+Summary:NTLMv1 authentication library
License:LGPLv2+
-URL:http://nongnu.org/libntlm/
+URL:http://nongnu.org/libntlm
Source0:
http://nongnu.org/libntlm/releases/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -
BuildRequires: pkgconfig +Provides: bundled(gnulib)
%description
A library for authenticating with Microsoft NTLM challenge-response,
@@ -17,54 +14,46 @@ derived from Samba sources.
%packagedevel
Summary:Development files for %{name}
-Group: Development/Libraries
-Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
-Requires: pkgconfig
+Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
%descriptiondevel
The %{name}-devel package contains libraries and header files for
developing applications that use %{name}.
-
%prep
%setup -q
-
%build
%configure --disable-static
make %{?_smp_mflags}
-
-
+NTLM
%install
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-touch -r NEWS $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_includedir}/ntlm.h
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'
-
-
-%clean
-rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-
+make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+touch -r %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ntlm.h
+find %{buildroot} -name '*.la' -exec rm -f {} ';'
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
-
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
-%doc AUTHORS COPYING README THANKS
-%{_libdir}/libntlm.so.*
+%doc AUTHORS ChangeLog COPYING README THANKS
+%{_libdir}/%{name}.so.*
%files devel
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc COPYING
%{_includedir}/ntlm.h
-%{_libdir}/libntlm.so
-%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/libntlm.pc
-
+%{_libdir}/%{name}.so
+%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc
%changelog
+* Mon Aug 26 2013 Christopher Meng r...@cicku.me - 1.4-1
+- New release(BZ#1000496).
+- Add gnulib virtual provides(BZ#821770).
+- Add AArch64 support(BZ#925829).
+- Devel package explicit arch requires.
+- Correct summary as it only supports V1 protocol.
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering
rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 1.3-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 785db93..92d127d 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-fd2419e4d1b7b70244c56c285e2a37a0 libntlm-1.3.tar.gz
+54793488450e9085c57e0d859ff3bc8c libntlm-1.4.tar.gz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAlIdGSYACgkQkSxm47BaWfeLSACgkSjU4vxJyTbHXdqPxEJCn3gw
p2wAnjdqrsSPSA6vcyBHMvX6N4c2Yrdf
=OKZL
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Why is AHCI built-in?
On 19.08.2013 20:46, Kyle McMartin wrote: On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 01:35:16PM -0500, Ian Pilcher wrote: On 08/19/2013 01:19 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote: because it's commonly used and found on basically every machine now. there are many advantages to having it built in that outweigh the cons. A couple of questions: - What are the advantages of having the driver built-in, as compared to simply ensuring that it's always included in the initramfs? performance, you'll take fewer tlb misses. Any links/docs to offer on this topic? Thanks. poma -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 04:30:25PM -0400, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote: From: mj...@srcf.ucam.org On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:54:46PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution Only if you want to drop VESA support. Please don't drop that. I have a large install base of SBCs using geode and some on savage and s3virge IIRC. I need at least the VESA fallback, although I suspect that may not suffice in some cases. Yeah, I don't think anyone's planning on dropping VESA support. It's just that supporting it at the moment means that we continue to support some UMS drivers, which makes it difficult to stick to a KMS or nothing approach. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Rebuilding gcc on Fedora 18 - Howto build i686 packages on a x86_64 machine
Hello, Hoping this is the correct place to ask this type of question also hope it's an easy / quick one. I'll gladly ask elsewhere if not. We have ran into a compiler issue with gcc and I was looking to apply a small patch[1] and I've done so via pulling down the gcc src.rpm on my updated Fedora 18 machine, added the necessary %patch additions to the gcc.spec file and it has compiled 38 x86_64 packages. I am also using Spacewalk and in order to ensure these packages were installed, I bumped up the gcc_release within the gcc.spec file. The problem is now that when I attempt to update the packages, I get an error about protected multilib versions[2]. I can not seem to get the rpmbuild process to produce any i686 versions of the packages. I have tried prefixing my rpmbuild command with a setarch i686 but it did not work (sorry, didn't capture my error). How do the experts build the i686 x86_64 packages? (I did notice the Build Host varies between the two, so I'm wondering if I need to build a 32bit Fedora 18 instance to repeat this build process?) Thank you, -- Jon Miller -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Rebuilding gcc on Fedora 18 - Howto build i686 packages on a x86_64 machine
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 21:48 -0700, Jon Miller wrote: How do the experts build the i686 x86_64 packages? (I did notice the Build Host varies between the two, so I'm wondering if I need to build a 32bit Fedora 18 instance to repeat this build process?) Use mock: mock -r fedora-18-i386 --rebuild foo.src.rpm -- Mathieu -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Rebuilding gcc on Fedora 18 - Howto build i686 packages on a x86_64 machine
On Wed, 28 Aug 2013 06:48:24 +0200, Jon Miller wrote: How do the experts build the i686 x86_64 packages? (I did notice the Build Host varies between the two, so I'm wondering if I need to build a 32bit Fedora 18 instance to repeat this build process?) With some packages it is possible to run: rpmbuild --target=i686 ... But .spec files usually have bugs here and there so mock is the only supported solution as suggested in the other mail. Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Overall rawhide package testing.
On 08/26/2013 09:14 PM, Pavel Alexeev wrote: Hi. 26.08.2013 16:19, Alec Leamas wrote: As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are reports on issues by package and packages by issue. May be it could be possible list it by packager? I want check my packages, but it is slightly troublesome. Hm... Since I'm lazy: does [1] solve this for you? Using pkgdb to fix this is some work since I so far only use yum and repoquery which certainly does not handle the maintainer info. --alec [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Overall fedora-review test results.
Quoting Michael Schwendt (2013-08-22 19:20:51) On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:27:47 +0200, Alec Leamas wrote: The overall results with some comments are at http://ur1.ca/f5xxw . The CheckSoFiles results might be .so plug-in libs (extension modules), which are stored in private paths, i.e. outside run-time linker's search. Or even non-versioned shared libs ending with .so, but being ordinary run-time libs (and no build-time libs for optional -devel packages). Fedora-review actually makes a difference between unversioned *so files in libdir and *so files in subdirectory under libdir. It will issue an error for the former and warning for the latter(making check pending - i.e. manual review needed). I've checked a few of the problems found and all of them were packaging bugs IMO. I have personally filed several bugs related to unversioned files (also discovered by f-r). Some of them are files that should be in -devel subpackage, some are plugins that should be in private subdirectory...and some are weird exceptions that no tool can automatically know about. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fonts with default Fedora installation
Le Mar 27 août 2013 06:34, pravin@gmail.com a écrit : Yeah. If someone does specific request for SMP we should go ahead with it. At the end of days it is going to take only some kb's space in ISO's. I know it's probably wishful thinking on my part, but it would be great if all the local Fedora orgs (ambassadors…) spent a little time checking our default fonts are suitable for their locale and suggested alternatives if not. i18n shouldn't be centralized the way it is now. (we have good Greek coverage for example because in the past Greek people got involved and pointed us to the Greek Font Society, but unfortunately this is the exception not the rule) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Fonts with default Fedora installation
On 27 August 2013 14:04, Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.netwrote: Le Mar 27 août 2013 06:34, pravin@gmail.com a écrit : Yeah. If someone does specific request for SMP we should go ahead with it. At the end of days it is going to take only some kb's space in ISO's. I know it's probably wishful thinking on my part, but it would be great if all the local Fedora orgs (ambassadors…) spent a little time checking our default fonts are suitable for their locale and suggested alternatives if not. i18n shouldn't be centralized the way it is now. (we have good Greek coverage for example because in the past Greek people got involved and pointed us to the Greek Font Society, but unfortunately this is the exception not the rule) Yes, i do agree. Presently we have more options and can be bit more choosy for default font. http://tagoh.fedorapeople.org/fonts/f19-defaultfonts.html can be useful for this. Regards, Pravin Satpute -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Reminder: Fedora 20 Alpha Change Deadline in one week
Greeting! This is a reminder, that the Alpha Change Deadline is coming in one week, on Sep 03, according to the schedule approved by FESCo [1]. After the freeze, you will have to use Bodhi for any updates to branched Fedora 20. Updates will land in updates-testing after being pushed. Updates that fix accepted blocker [2] and accepted Freeze Exception bugs [3] for the Alpha release will be pushed into the base repo when stable. Current Alpha Blocker Bugs list is available at [4]. Software String Freeze is the same date. Jaroslav PS: I'll be out for a few days this week but back by the deadline... [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [4] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/20/alpha/buglist ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Unresponsive maintainer of plasma-widget-menubar
Am Sonntag, 25. August 2013, 14:39:50 schrieben Sie: Hi, the package maintainer of plasma-widget-menubar doesn't response for some months. The package needs to be updated to v0.2.0. See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=952360. I like to take the maintainership. Problem has been solved, the maintainer jreznik has added me as a co- maintainer. Best Regards, Mario -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Unresponsive maintainer of plasma-widget-menubar
- Original Message - Oh? The Changes wrangler? Yeah, me and sorry about that :( Problem solved. Jaroslav -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Overall rawhide package testing.
There are many false positive issues with RubyGems in the report. Namely about: 279 GemCheckRequiresRubygems https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/224 333 RubyCheckTestsRun https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/ticket/225 I already submitted patch to address the first issue. Regards Josef - Original Message - From: Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:19:01 PM Subject: Overall rawhide package testing. As agreed [1], we have run fedora-review on (almost) all packages in current rawhide. The results are now available at [2]. Here are reports on issues by package and packages by issue. We have discussed sending email about these results to the package owners. Is this a good idea? In any case, I think it might be good if you check your own packages, chances are that something otherwise unnoticed is discovered. Please don't forget the README. For those interested in the overall distribution, the package by issue reports perhaps also might add something as well as the 'stats' file in the top dir. --alec [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/188133.html [2] http://leamas.fedorapeople.org/fedora-review/tree/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Graphics driver support in F21+
For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers: xorg-x11-drv-apm xorg-x11-drv-cirrus xorg-x11-drv-geode xorg-x11-drv-glint xorg-x11-drv-i128 xorg-x11-drv-i740 xorg-x11-drv-mach64 xorg-x11-drv-mga xorg-x11-drv-neomagic xorg-x11-drv-r128 xorg-x11-drv-rendition xorg-x11-drv-s3virge xorg-x11-drv-savage xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion xorg-x11-drv-sis xorg-x11-drv-tdfx xorg-x11-drv-trident Effectively this means that the graphics team will be focusing on KMS for graphics support, with vesa and fbdev available as last-ditch fallbacks. If anyone is interested in taking on support for these chips, they're welcome to, though we would encourage anyone doing so to work towards KMS support and not merely do keep it building maintenance. One other detail: the intel driver currently has both UMS support for the i810 chipset, and KMS support for everything newer. To be consistent with the above changes I'll be dropping the i810 support, which will then fall back to vesa. Again, if someone wants to own the i810 support, let me know and we can add you as a comaintainer. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On 08/27/2013 02:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers: xorg-x11-drv-apm xorg-x11-drv-cirrus xorg-x11-drv-geode xorg-x11-drv-glint xorg-x11-drv-i128 xorg-x11-drv-i740 xorg-x11-drv-mach64 xorg-x11-drv-mga xorg-x11-drv-neomagic xorg-x11-drv-r128 xorg-x11-drv-rendition xorg-x11-drv-s3virge xorg-x11-drv-savage xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion xorg-x11-drv-sis xorg-x11-drv-tdfx xorg-x11-drv-trident Is it not better to drop entirely graphics drivers that do not have kms support and at the *same time* adopt the policy From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
Out of curiosity, is the cirrus driver used in qemu/kvm or does it use something else? On 08/27/2013 10:46 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers: xorg-x11-drv-apm xorg-x11-drv-cirrus xorg-x11-drv-geode xorg-x11-drv-glint xorg-x11-drv-i128 xorg-x11-drv-i740 xorg-x11-drv-mach64 xorg-x11-drv-mga xorg-x11-drv-neomagic xorg-x11-drv-r128 xorg-x11-drv-rendition xorg-x11-drv-s3virge xorg-x11-drv-savage xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion xorg-x11-drv-sis xorg-x11-drv-tdfx xorg-x11-drv-trident Effectively this means that the graphics team will be focusing on KMS for graphics support, with vesa and fbdev available as last-ditch fallbacks. If anyone is interested in taking on support for these chips, they're welcome to, though we would encourage anyone doing so to work towards KMS support and not merely do keep it building maintenance. One other detail: the intel driver currently has both UMS support for the i810 chipset, and KMS support for everything newer. To be consistent with the above changes I'll be dropping the i810 support, which will then fall back to vesa. Again, if someone wants to own the i810 support, let me know and we can add you as a comaintainer. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 10:58 -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote: Out of curiosity, is the cirrus driver used in qemu/kvm or does it use something else? There's a KMS driver for qemu's cirrus emulation now; X loads xorg-x11-drv-modesetting in that scenario. (Likewise for the Matrox G200SE series of server GPUs, they get handled by -modesetting not by -mga.) - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: On 08/27/2013 02:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers: xorg-x11-drv-apm xorg-x11-drv-cirrus xorg-x11-drv-geode xorg-x11-drv-glint xorg-x11-drv-i128 xorg-x11-drv-i740 xorg-x11-drv-mach64 xorg-x11-drv-mga xorg-x11-drv-neomagic xorg-x11-drv-r128 xorg-x11-drv-rendition xorg-x11-drv-s3virge xorg-x11-drv-savage xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion xorg-x11-drv-sis xorg-x11-drv-tdfx xorg-x11-drv-trident Is it not better to drop entirely graphics drivers that do not have kms support and at the *same time* adopt the policy From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution Isn't that a bit too much? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, 2013-08-27 at 14:54 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: Is it not better to drop entirely graphics drivers that do not have kms support and at the *same time* adopt the policy From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution I don't know why that would be better. There's no intrinsic reason why we should forbid UMS drivers if there's a maintainer, it doesn't necessarily make my life harder to allow that. And, given that the list _does_ include hardware that people have filed bugs about in recent memory, I figure I should allow those interested in to step forward. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
xorg-x11-drv-geode geode is used on the OLPC XO-1 and is maintained by Daniel Drake (dsd) and he's basically done all recent commits for upstream releases and fixes unless it's been something like an ABI rebuild or similar. I'm sure he'll take over the maintainership if needed. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 10:46:19AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: For F21, I plan to orphan the following X video drivers: xorg-x11-drv-apm xorg-x11-drv-cirrus xorg-x11-drv-geode xorg-x11-drv-glint xorg-x11-drv-i128 xorg-x11-drv-i740 xorg-x11-drv-mach64 xorg-x11-drv-mga xorg-x11-drv-neomagic xorg-x11-drv-r128 xorg-x11-drv-rendition xorg-x11-drv-s3virge xorg-x11-drv-savage xorg-x11-drv-siliconmotion xorg-x11-drv-sis xorg-x11-drv-tdfx xorg-x11-drv-trident Effectively this means that the graphics team will be focusing on KMS for graphics support, with vesa and fbdev available as last-ditch fallbacks. If anyone is interested in taking on support for these chips, they're welcome to, though we would encourage anyone doing so to work towards KMS support and not merely do keep it building maintenance. Presumably for virtualization environments, the implication is that people should aim to use SPICE + QXL for graphics, and if they really, really, really want to stick with the crappy Cirrus + VNC combo, they will just have to use the vesa Xorg driver. GNOME Boxes is already doing SPICE + QXL by default for all modern Fedora. We'll need to make sure virt-manager/virt-install are doing the same by default for Fedora, and then we'll be fine wrt virt IMHO. Regards, Daniel -- |: http://berrange.com -o-http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :| -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 02:54:46PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution Only if you want to drop VESA support. -- Matthew Garrett | mj...@srcf.ucam.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ino - Desperately looking for a new maintainer (with an actual Arduino)
Hi, I've somehow managed to build and maintain a bit package ino. The reason is simple - I need it as a BuildRequires for some other package. However I don't have an Arduino and is very hard for me to test the package in action and respond / solve the bugs related to it. I don't want to orphan it (as it would break my stack), but if anyone here has an Arduino and uses it - could you PLEASE take this package? Thanks a lot, Miro Hrončok -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On 08/27/2013 03:14 PM, drago01 wrote: On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 4:54 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote: Is it not better to drop entirely graphics drivers that do not have kms support and at the *same time* adopt the policy From this point forward only graphics driver that have kms support will be allow to be packaged and shipped in the distribution Isn't that a bit too much? Depends If we want people to kick some live to upstream and add kms support we go that route. If we want to just keep building these things and have our end user base having to come up with their own xorg.conf and basically deliver broken out the box support for some if not all those drivers we dont. JBG -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Comps Cleanup
Kalev Lember (kalevlem...@gmail.com) said: I'd like to be able to commit to master, check out the f20 branch, and 'git cherry-pick master'. Is that really that much difference than git diff | sed | patch? In any case, this would (as stated) require fixing the buildrawhide, buildbranced, and bodhi compose processes, at a minimum. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Why is AHCI built-in?
On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:16:03 -0500 Ian Pilcher arequip...@gmail.com wrote: (I want to rebuild it with LED triggers for the disk LEDs on my NAS.) Frankly this sounds like madness. You need to build a kernel, it's trivial -- just edit one of configs and rpmbuild -ba, and then you have very clear delineation of what upgrades what and what depends on what. -- Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Graphics driver support in F21+
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 9:30 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: xorg-x11-drv-geode geode is used on the OLPC XO-1 and is maintained by Daniel Drake (dsd) and he's basically done all recent commits for upstream releases and fixes unless it's been something like an ABI rebuild or similar. I'm sure he'll take over the maintainership if needed. Yes, I will take that one. Thanks for looking after it over the years. Daniel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
File MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-1.000.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute: fccf3d6c92134aca692174bc81491b4a MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-1.000.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute] 1.000 bump
commit f8008b596be69f9f462792ebbaeea0edf2b4b7b7
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:38:47 2013 +0200
1.000 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute.spec | 28 +++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index cfc600d..e06247b 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
/MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-0.802.tar.gz
+/MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-1.000.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute.spec
b/perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute.spec
index f687326..825c55e 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute
-Version:0.802
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:1.000
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Define coercions per attribute
License:GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -8,18 +8,18 @@ URL:
http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooseX-CoercePerAttribute/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/authors/id/M/MR/MRF/MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
BuildRequires: perl
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
-BuildRequires: perl(strict)
-BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
+BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build::Tiny) = 0.025
# Run-time:
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Role)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
# Tests:
BuildRequires: perl(Data::Dumper)
BuildRequires: perl(lib)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Deep)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Optional tests:
BuildRequires: perl(Pod::Coverage) = 0.18
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod) = 1.22
@@ -27,29 +27,31 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage) = 1.08
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
%description
-A simple Moose Trait to allow you to define coercions per attribute.
+A simple Moose Trait that allows you to define in-line coercions per attribute.
%prep
%setup -q -n MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-%{version}
%build
-perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
-make %{?_smp_mflags}
+perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor
+./Build
%install
-make pure_install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
+./Build install --destdir=%{buildroot} --create_packlist=0
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}/*
%check
-make test
+./Build test
%files
-%doc Changes README
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Aug 27 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 1.000-1
+- 1.000 bump
+
* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org
- 0.802-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index c31cc9c..42f61ab 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-70f54b3eb2d219817f1c65c53854d568 MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-0.802.tar.gz
+fccf3d6c92134aca692174bc81491b4a MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-1.000.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Lexical-Var-0.009.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by jplesnik
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Lexical-Var: e0b2aa20146f26494f2e10dab7f43341 Lexical-Var-0.009.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Lexical-Var] 0.009 bump
commit aa119236b11cdc13cda0281a782997d2dde5ed38
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:41:51 2013 +0200
0.009 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Lexical-Var.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d55e58b..587f0e1 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
/Lexical-Var-0.007.tar.gz
/Lexical-Var-0.008.tar.gz
+/Lexical-Var-0.009.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Lexical-Var.spec b/perl-Lexical-Var.spec
index a9672d5..daec374 100644
--- a/perl-Lexical-Var.spec
+++ b/perl-Lexical-Var.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Lexical-Var
-Version:0.008
+Version:0.009
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Static variables without name space pollution
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f
{} \;
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Aug 27 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.009-1
+- 0.009 bump
+
* Mon Aug 19 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.008-1
- 0.008 bump
- Modernize spec
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index aad49c6..ec7a4ae 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a2666ca09a1b4149c117d1224054c9e2 Lexical-Var-0.008.tar.gz
+e0b2aa20146f26494f2e10dab7f43341 Lexical-Var-0.009.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1001114] perl-Lexical-Var-0.009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001114 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Lexical-Var-0.009-1.fc ||2 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-08-27 03:50:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4RZX7Iw7ooa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Lexical-Var/f20] 0.009 bump
commit 6dd57cc45f3196fe86459b57e40b181aa3cd2a2c
Author: Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 27 09:51:08 2013 +0200
0.009 bump
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Lexical-Var.spec |5 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index d55e58b..587f0e1 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -1,2 +1,3 @@
/Lexical-Var-0.007.tar.gz
/Lexical-Var-0.008.tar.gz
+/Lexical-Var-0.009.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Lexical-Var.spec b/perl-Lexical-Var.spec
index a9672d5..daec374 100644
--- a/perl-Lexical-Var.spec
+++ b/perl-Lexical-Var.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Lexical-Var
-Version:0.008
+Version:0.009
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Static variables without name space pollution
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name '*.bs' -size 0 -exec rm -f
{} \;
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Aug 27 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.009-1
+- 0.009 bump
+
* Mon Aug 19 2013 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com - 0.008-1
- 0.008 bump
- Modernize spec
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index aad49c6..ec7a4ae 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a2666ca09a1b4149c117d1224054c9e2 Lexical-Var-0.008.tar.gz
+e0b2aa20146f26494f2e10dab7f43341 Lexical-Var-0.009.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1001114] perl-Lexical-Var-0.009 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001114 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Lexical-Var-0.009-1.fc |perl-Lexical-Var-0.009-1.fc |2 |21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=BSZob0R2V7a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 957645] perl-MIME-EncWords-1.014.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=957645 Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-MIME-EncWords-1.014.1 |perl-MIME-EncWords-1.014.2 |is available|is available --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Latest upstream release: 1.014.2 Current version/release in Fedora Rawhide: 1.012.6-4.fc20 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MIME-EncWords/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=x4sqd7hQaHa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 997838] perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttribute-1.000 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=997838 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-CoercePerAttrib ||ute-1.000-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-08-27 04:09:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Qevw358eeaa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 980883] perl-DBD-MySQL requires libmysqlclient.so.18 provided by mariadb.-libs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=980883 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-08-27 06:40:16 --- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com --- I found following information on Features/ReplaceMySQLwithMariaDB * exclude=mariadb* should be used during the upgrade from F18 to F19. Then it should be removed * If you really need to install community-mysql client library and/or devel files (packaged as community-mysql-libs, community-mysql-devel) instead of mariadb packages, note that you will have to keep mariadb-libs (which is the only package that doesn't conflict with community-mysql) to be able to use packages depending on mariadb client packages. mariadb-libs have to be installed, although you are using community-mysql*. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rik7yXCRJLa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Jemplate
perl-Jemplate has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-ParseUtil-Domain
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On armhfp: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: slic3r
slic3r has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Qt
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libperl.so()(64bit) On i386: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.i686 requires libperl.so On armhfp: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl requires libperl.so Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On armhfp: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-IPTables-libiptc
perl-IPTables-libiptc has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6 On armhfp: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.6 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Padre
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree: On x86_64: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts] 0.020 bump
commit 53084835c132f67768edfcca87ed2753b9418857
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Aug 27 14:33:50 2013 +0200
0.020 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec | 25 ++---
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 6877c07..d9e2d41 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -7,3 +7,4 @@
/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.015.tar.gz
/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.017.tar.gz
/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.019.tar.gz
+/MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.020.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
b/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
index cd1b7bc..3618e49 100644
--- a/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
+++ b/perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts
-Version:0.019
-Release:3%{?dist}
+Version:0.020
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Shorthand for common Moose attribute options
License:LGPLv2
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -16,26 +16,27 @@ BuildRequires: perl(Moose)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Util::MetaRole)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Util::TypeConstraints)
-BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::CoercePerAttribute) = 0.802
+BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::CoercePerAttribute) = 1.000
BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Role::Parameterized)
BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types::Common::String)
BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types::Moose)
BuildRequires: perl(namespace::autoclean)
# Tests only:
BuildRequires: perl(aliased)
+BuildRequires: perl(blib)
+BuildRequires: perl(Capture::Tiny)
BuildRequires: perl(constant)
-BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
-BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Role)
BuildRequires: perl(MooseX::Types::Path::Class)
BuildRequires: perl(Moose::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(Path::Class)
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::CheckDeps) = 0.004
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Fatal)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Moose)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Moose::More) = 0.018
-BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.88
-Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `%{__perl} -V:version`; echo
$version))
-Requires: perl(MooseX::CoercePerAttribute) = 0.802
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.94
+Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
+Requires: perl(MooseX::CoercePerAttribute) = 1.000
%description
Ever find yourself repeatedly specifying writers and builders, because there's
@@ -53,24 +54,26 @@ handle the above variations.
%setup -q -n MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-%{version}
%build
-%{__perl} Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
make pure_install PERL_INSTALL_ROOT=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} \;
-find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -depth -type d -exec rmdir {} 2/dev/null \;
%{_fixperms} $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/*
%check
make test
%files
-%doc Changes README
+%doc Changes LICENSE README
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Aug 27 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.020-1
+- 0.020 bump
+
* Wed Aug 07 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.019-3
- Perl 5.18 rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 653f96b..38ae448 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-eef4905f87832b270d0d5cb5ef582f49 MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.019.tar.gz
+08010ed30a414202e60e666975235bb1 MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.020.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.020.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts: 08010ed30a414202e60e666975235bb1 MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.020.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 999031] perl-MooseX-AttributeShortcuts-0.020 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999031 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-MooseX-AttributeShortc ||uts-0.020-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-08-27 08:45:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=4cuPtkaXK4a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Padre
perl-Padre has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-Padre-0.90-6.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-IPTables-libiptc
perl-IPTables-libiptc has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-IPTables-libiptc-0.52-5.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: slic3r
slic3r has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On i386: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) On armhfp: slic3r-0.9.10b-2.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.3) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile
perl-Encode-JP-Mobile has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Encode-JP-Mobile-0.30-2.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Qt
perl-Qt has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libperl.so()(64bit) On i386: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.i686 requires libperl.so On armhfp: perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-Qt-0.96.0-6.fc19.armv7hl requires libperl.so Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML
perl-MIME-Lite-HTML has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On i386: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) On armhfp: perl-MIME-Lite-HTML-1.24-4.fc18.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.0) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Jemplate
perl-Jemplate has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Jemplate-0.262-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-ParseUtil-Domain
perl-ParseUtil-Domain has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-ParseUtil-Domain-2.22-3.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene
perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On i386: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) On armhfp: perl-Bio-ASN1-EntrezGene-1.091-19.fc20.noarch requires perl(Bio::Index::AbstractSeq) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.x86_64 requires libgd.so.2()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) perl-PDL-2.4.10-6.fc19.i686 requires libgd.so.2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes
perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-MooseX-TrackDirty-Attributes-2.002-2.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT
perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.3.1-3.fc20.noarch requires root-core Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Unix-Statgrab
perl-Unix-Statgrab has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.x86_64 requires libstatgrab.so.6()(64bit) On i386: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.i686 requires libstatgrab.so.6 On armhfp: perl-Unix-Statgrab-0.04-20.fc20.armv7hl requires libstatgrab.so.6 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 958481] perl-Pod-Coverage-0.23 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958481 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-08-27 10:19:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=pWMIJegj4za=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 929408] perl-Module-Build-0.4004 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=929408 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2013-08-27 10:20:48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=1RftWLPlUsa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 839754] Review Request: perl-Rose-DB-Object - Extensible, high performance object-relational mapper (ORM)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=839754 Jitka Plesnikova jples...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-08-27 10:41:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=NvMU0RHVX9a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 950017] Unable to use LOG_EMERG level in Sys::Syslog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950017 Bug 950017 depends on bug 950057, which changed state. Bug 950057 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sys-Syslog - Perl interface to the UNIX syslog(3) calls https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950057 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AFl9rwYEu8a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 956010] perl-Module-Install-XSUtil-0.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956010 Bug 956010 depends on bug 956297, which changed state. Bug 956297 Summary: Review Request: perl-Spellunker - Pure perl spelling checker implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956297 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=CLmQpxTYrba=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 989511] Cannot install perl-PAR-Packer via yum
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989511 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2013-08-27 12:01:43 --- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- I've responded to bug #987189. The conflict isn't caused by PAR::Packer; that the manpage is empty is a different issue. Closing as NOTABUG; this should be resolved in #987189. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zh7CZt3i22a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 999372] perl-YAML-Tiny-1.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999372 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|st...@silug.org |psab...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=rOd7A4EFkOa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 999372] perl-YAML-Tiny-1.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=999372 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-YAML-Tiny-1.54-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2013-08-27 14:10:08 --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Already done by Paul. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=YnbFcuBOQ9a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1000526] perl-WWW-Shorten-3.04 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1000526 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- Package perl-WWW-Shorten-3.04-1.fc19: * should fix your issue, * was pushed to the Fedora 19 testing repository, * should be available at your local mirror within two days. Update it with: # su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=updates-testing perl-WWW-Shorten-3.04-1.fc19' as soon as you are able to. Please go to the following url: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2013-15370/perl-WWW-Shorten-3.04-1.fc19 then log in and leave karma (feedback). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5I2Gq5K3Wsa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: Review Request 46: New admin interface and builds support
On Aug. 26, 2013, 1:35 p.m., Martin Krizek wrote: When trying to create new release I get: [view.py:757] 2013-08-26 14:34:04 ERROR Failed to create model Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/mkrizek/devel/blockerbugs/env_blockerbugs/lib/python2.7/site-packages/flask_admin/contrib/sqlamodel/view.py, line 750, in create_model model = self.model() TypeError: __init__() takes at least 2 arguments (1 given) Tim Flink wrote: I'm unable to reproduce this issue locally - I can create a new database without issue. Were you trying to add a release to an existing database? have you tried removing all .pyc and .pyo files? (find . -name '*.pyc' -delete)? This issue is fixed in latest new_admin branch. - Ilgiz --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/#review81 --- On Aug. 22, 2013, 7:01 p.m., Ilgiz Islamgulov wrote: --- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/ --- (Updated Aug. 22, 2013, 7:01 p.m.) Review request for blockerbugs. Repository: blockerbugs Description --- Implement new admin interface with flask-admin Add build support Diffs - testing/testfunc_update_sync.py 70c600515ccc5e97ed17b4cadd40d76277794b67 testing/testfunc_bugsync.py 496f2994dda81bc82f2e270944a3fb2b391d9d91 testing/testfunc_bugmodel.py a50f3458b2154f13736ab1f93cb3d1a86a48fcb1 testing/test_spinmodel.py PRE-CREATION testing/test_controllers.py 702d2a5390e42910176d327461ef628e6bf8b849 testing/test_api.py e92dda539117f94f3283f6ce262d65295a5e32c1 setup.py 89621b0debb5d368a027a4801de7da62fa961eab sass/admin_layout.scss PRE-CREATION requirements.txt 98eab5da9306a101a41dd13708df1900e9fd1018 blockerbugs/util/koji_interface.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/templates/spin_list.html c455ff4edec0991a453a94cd0e38d959e1757672 blockerbugs/templates/admin_layout.html PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/templates/admin/modify_release.html a3bb0d95c49414ff977e82f828ffdd111e105cc6 blockerbugs/templates/admin/main.html 251b1df1647e307e89bcda365422f1cee59b9a35 blockerbugs/templates/admin/admin_nav.html 34a0c2a966c265ab66166b3170f5f6d507014149 blockerbugs/templates/admin/add_spin.html be44830da436e4e87700fe940a7c5197b32d1e82 blockerbugs/templates/admin/add_release.html 931001b23f52dd1b75fe0feb8d0311b76fcc907e blockerbugs/static/js/admin.js PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/models/update.py 9660d038720bcecae8e4f7401e09e26bd6589189 blockerbugs/models/spin.py fa8e0e9a887f269cf31e850baa90678ff7055b78 blockerbugs/models/release.py cca27cff41875528c1ee13d95194de5f237f31d4 blockerbugs/models/milestone.py 31667f6467ed111c3594cdd86d1c933f73b7dfc2 blockerbugs/models/build.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/models/__init__.py 0223fff2996290005bd50412c844979304ce38a2 blockerbugs/controllers/users.py 7b6954adc39b23c997033916e1adc17639451fdd blockerbugs/controllers/main.py 44924e096803b5c448dbd84dc5fe0405a97ebc50 blockerbugs/controllers/api/utils.py 38144dd48f3190f709a9bafa3a5a425dfdfffbdf blockerbugs/controllers/api/api.py d6df7d34170da05bd817b12545596f34b43b9da6 blockerbugs/controllers/admin/spin.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin/build.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin/auth.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin/__init__.py PRE-CREATION blockerbugs/controllers/admin.py 4ce6c9f58b5513c280312c8d1dd92c341d259d0a blockerbugs/config.py 03e8b2a92aaaf7328b68c3fa4eb585a189f52186 blockerbugs/__init__.py b9d7a40e4e9b47624795958212025428e7788b0f blockerbugs.spec cda6d4e4c56cce5b3ab37665b4f1988fc62f29ce alembic/versions/f9e369bf00d_added_spin_type_cons.py PRE-CREATION alembic/versions/1162fb4d4358_added_build_table.py PRE-CREATION Diff: http://reviewboard-tflink.rhcloud.com/r/46/diff/ Testing --- I've tested on my develop instance. Thanks, Ilgiz Islamgulov ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
Reminder: Fedora 20 Alpha Change Deadline in one week
Greeting! This is a reminder, that the Alpha Change Deadline is coming in one week, on Sep 03, according to the schedule approved by FESCo [1]. After the freeze, you will have to use Bodhi for any updates to branched Fedora 20. Updates will land in updates-testing after being pushed. Updates that fix accepted blocker [2] and accepted Freeze Exception bugs [3] for the Alpha release will be pushed into the base repo when stable. Current Alpha Blocker Bugs list is available at [4]. Software String Freeze is the same date. Jaroslav PS: I'll be out for a few days this week but back by the deadline... [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [3] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [4] https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/milestone/20/alpha/buglist ___ devel-announce mailing list devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
