EPEL Fedora 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 713 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 60 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0440/fwsnort-1.6.4-1.el6 55 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0483/boinc-client-7.2.33-3.git1994cc8.el6 45 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0590/oath-toolkit-2.0.2-4.el6 16 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0888/v8-3.14.5.10-7.el6 11 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0938/seamonkey-2.21-5.ESR_24.4.0.el6 8 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0980/perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.38-4.el6 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0996/munin-2.0.20-1.el6 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0990/libyaml-0.1.6-1.el6 5 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1011/php-ZendFramework-1.12.5-1.el6 4 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1020/php-ZendFramework2-2.2.6-1.el6 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1039/mod_security-2.7.3-3.el6 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1044/ansible-1.5.4-1.el6 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1050/check-mk-1.2.4p1-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing koji-1.9.0-1.el6 php-pecl-http-2.0.5-1.el6 php-pecl-raphf-1.0.4-1.el6.1 python-enum34-0.9.23-1.el6 Details about builds: koji-1.9.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1065) Build system tools Update Information: update to upstream 1.9.0 ChangeLog: * Mon Mar 24 2014 Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us - 1.9.0-1 - update to upstream 1.9.0 References: [ 1 ] Bug #958499 - koji-vm should not be using python-virtinst code https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958499 [ 2 ] Bug #995764 - koji-vm cannot be installed because of missing dependency on python-virtinst https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995764 php-pecl-http-2.0.5-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1066) Extended HTTP support Update Information: Release notes: * Fix rare crash with uninitialized CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER * Fix build with -Werror=format-security (Remi) * Fix build with extenal libs needed by libcurl ChangeLog: * Fri Apr 4 2014 Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org - 2.0.5-1 - Update to 2.0.5 php-pecl-raphf-1.0.4-1.el6.1 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1066) Resource and persistent handles factory Update Information: Release notes: * Fix rare crash with uninitialized CURLOPT_HTTPHEADER * Fix build with -Werror=format-security (Remi) * Fix build with extenal libs needed by libcurl ChangeLog: * Tue Mar 4 2014 Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org - 1.0.4-1.1 - rebuild * Tue Nov 26 2013 Remi Collet r...@fedoraproject.org - 1.0.4-1 - Update to 1.0.4 (stable) - install doc in pecl doc_dir - install tests in pecl test_dir - add --with tests option (not enabled, need pecl/http) python-enum34-0.9.23-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1067) Backport of Python 3.4 Enum Update Information: Backport of Python 3.4 enum type to earlier Python releases. References: [ 1 ] Bug #1033975 - Review Request: python-enum34 - Backport of Python 3.4 Enum https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033975 ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
EPEL Fedora 5 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing: Age URL 713 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5 168 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11893/libguestfs-1.20.12-1.el5 48 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0581/augeas-1.2.0-1.el5 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0984/munin-2.0.20-1.el5 7 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-0988/libyaml-0.1.2-7.el5 3 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1041/mod_security-2.6.8-5.el5 2 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1047/check-mk-1.2.4p1-1.el5 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 5 updates-testing 389-ds-base-1.2.11.29-1.el5 Details about builds: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.29-1.el5 (FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1068) 389 Directory Server (base) Update Information: 389-ds-base-1.2.11.29 release - several bug fixes and enhancements ChangeLog: * Fri Apr 4 2014 Noriko Hosoi nho...@redhat.com - 1.2.11.29-1 - bump version to 1.2.11.29 - Ticket 47766 - Tombstone purging can crash the server if the backend is stopped/disabled - Ticket 47492 - PassSync removes User must change password flag on the Windows side - Ticket 47448 - Segfault in 389-ds-base-1.3.1.4-1.fc19 when setting up FreeIPA replication - Ticket 47740 - Fix coverity issues(part 7) - Ticket 47748 - Simultaneous adding a user and binding as the user could fail in the password policy check - Ticket 47743 - Memory leak with proxy auth control - Ticket 47740 - Crash caused by changes to certmap.c - Ticket 47740 - Fix coverity issues: null deferences - Part 6 - Ticket 47735 - e_uniqueid fails to set if an entry is a conflict entry - Ticket 47740 - Coverity issue in 1.3.3 - Ticket 47740 - Fix coverity issues - Part 5 - Ticket 47740 - Fix coverity erorrs - Part 4 - Ticket 47640 - Fix coverity issues - part 3 - Ticket 47538 - RFE: repl-monitor.pl plain text output, cmdline config options - Ticket 47740 - Coverity Fixes (Mark - part 1) - Ticket 47734 - Change made in resolving ticket #346 fails on Debian SPARC64 - Ticket 47722 - Fixed filter not correctly identified - Ticket 47722 - rsearch filter error on any search filter - Ticket 47704 - invalid sizelimits in aci group evaluation - Ticket 47737 - Under heavy stress, failure of turning a tombstone into glue makes the server hung - Ticket 47735 - e_uniqueid fails to set if an entry is a conflict entry - Ticket 47731 - A tombstone entry is deleted by ldapdelete - Ticket 47729 - Directory Server crashes if shutdown during a replication initialization - Ticket 47637 - rsa_null_sha should not be enabled by default - Ticket 417, 458, 47522 - Password Administrator Backport - Ticket 47455 - valgrind - value mem leaks, uninit mem usage - fix coverity 11915 - dead code - introduced with fix for ticket 346 - Ticket 47369 - version2 - provide default syntax plugin - Ticket 346 - version 4 Slow ldapmodify operation time for large quantities of multi-valued attribute values - Ticket 415 - winsync doesn't sync DN valued attributes if DS DN value doesn't exist - Ticket 47642 - Windows Sync group issues - Ticket 47692 - single valued attribute replicated ADD does not work - Ticket 47677 - Size returned by slapi_entry_size is not accurate - Ticket 47693 - Environment variables are not passed when DS is started via service - Ticket 47693 - Environment variables are not passed when DS is started via service - Ticket 471 - logconv.pl tool removes the access logs contents if -M is not correctly used - Ticket 47463 - IDL-style can become mismatched during partial restoration - Ticket 47638 - Overflow in nsslapd-disk-monitoring-threshold on 32bit platform - Ticket 47641 - 7-bit check plugin not checking MODRDN operation - Ticket 47678 - modify-delete userpassword - Ticket 47516 - replication stops with excessive clock skew - Ticket 47627 - Fix replication logging - Ticket 47627 - changelog iteration should ignore cleaned rids when getting the minCSN - Ticket 47623 - fix memleak caused by 47347 - Ticket 47587 - hard coded limit of 64 masters in agreement and changelog code - Ticket 47591 - entries with empty objectclass attribute value can be hidden - Ticket 47596 - attrcrypt fails to find unlocked key ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: rawhide report: 20140404 changes
Hi, On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 01:42:49PM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only an occasional peek at a changelog information, but on a number of occasions these messages were crucial for me in disentangling broken dependencies on my rawhide installation and/or filing some packaging bugs. Without that information I would have a much harder time and either would add some spurious junk to bugzilla or would not bother at all. They seem mostly to just raise the noise. As opposed to what? As opposed to meaningful discussion generated intentionally by human collaborators. But it appears that quite a few people do find them beneficial, and that's all I was asking. As far as I am concerned, these mails are more useful than a significant part of the meaningful discussion generated intentionally by human collaborators. For one thing, it is the easiest way to discover which packages have been newly added to Fedora. Out of curiosity: do you really find one additional mail per day a problem, in the context of the usual traffic on fedora-devel? D. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
Matthias Clasen píše v Čt 03. 04. 2014 v 10:20 -0400: Hey, so the time has come to consider this - thanks to the great work of Richard and Kalev on the copr, we have a set of 3.12 packages that have already received fairly wide testing. But we should be careful, so I want to ask for concrete problem reports with the copr packages, besides dependency problems caused by the parallel nature of the copr itself. Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ? Did you experience crashes or other serious problems with applications ? I had really bed experience on my laptop (Lenovo X201, Intel graphics). At first I've got to dependency loop with yum. I had some other DM (cinnamon, xfce, kde plasma) and some extra repositories (for flash-plugin, skype, ...): [adobe-linux-x86_64] name=Adobe Systems Incorporated baseurl=http://linuxdownload.adobe.com/linux/x86_64/ enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 gpgkey=file:///etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-adobe-linux [fedora-skype] name=Skype for Fedora baseurl=http://negativo17.org/repos/skype/fedora-$releasever/$basearch/ enabled=1 skip_if_unavailable=1 gpgkey=http://negativo17.org/repos/RPM-GPG-KEY-slaanesh gpgcheck=1 [google-chrome] name=google-chrome baseurl=http://dl.google.com/linux/chrome/rpm/stable/x86_64 enabled=1 gpgcheck=1 and rpmfusion-free.repo rpmfusion-nonfree.repo something wanted packages from gnome 3.10. I've suspected cinnamon firstly but I couldn't prove that. In Fedora 20 is no way how to uninstall yum groups anymore so I've tried uninstall them manually with no success to dependency problem. Than I've read rhudges comment he use dnf instead of you to update. Update worked but after reboot I've ended in black GDM screen. After startx from text console I've got: „Oh no! Something has gone wrong.“ and only window of Pidgin and button Log Out“ were visible. Than I've found several packages not replaced with newer from rhughes-f20-gnome-3-12, which I did manually than but with no positive result to functionality. I've tried replace my homedir with empty one but with the same result. I didn't find reason and had to reinstall laptop. After brand new installation of F20 update to gnome 3.12 worked even with yum with no problem and everything seam to work fine. This is my story Pavel If so, please let us know on the desktop list. If I don't hear of major problems by next week, I'll file a Fesco ticket to ask for an exception. Matthias -- Pavel Lisý pavel.l...@gmail.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com wrote: On 04/04/2014 05:40 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: First after the upgrade I didn't even boot to GDM. Too bad I didn't debug it because I had already been considering a clean install, so I did it right away. My setup was not typical, I had been upgrading since F15. But apparently I was not the only one. One guy on the forum complained about a very similar problem. He blames i686 packages and their dependencies which might have been my problem as well because due to Steam I also had a lot from the graphics stack installed in i686 versions. I had the same problem. It turned out I was missing the glib2 package update from the COPR. The reason was that I had both glib2.x86_64 and glib2.i686 installed, but I only enabled the x86_64 COPR. dnf silently skipped updating the package due to this problem. COPRs lack of multilib support is really broken .. is there work being done to fix this? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Review swap: python-catkin_lint
Hi, I just submitted the package-catkin_lint for review. Please feel free to swap reviews :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1084681 I haven't been able to get the tests in the source to run yet. Any pointers there will be appreciated. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
On Fri, 2014-04-04 at 17:55 +0200, Michal Schmidt wrote: I had the same problem. It turned out I was missing the glib2 package update from the COPR. The reason was that I had both glib2.x86_64 and glib2.i686 installed, but I only enabled the x86_64 COPR. dnf silently skipped updating the package due to this problem. We noticed this. Richard updated the install instructions to include both repos: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/rhughes/f20-gnome-3-12/ If using dnf, please use the --best flag. Otherwise, dnf simply skips broken packages without reporting any errors. Adam added a note to the updates-testing guide: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 22:34 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: The gnome-3.12 copr includes a couple of low-level package updates that change abi/api that affects other desktops, notably: upower-0.99 PackageKit-0.9.x Are these 2 required by gnome-3.12 or would it be possible to use the (current) f20 versions? PackageKit should not need to be updated. upower will be a small problem. GNOME might need to be patched to use the older upower in F20 (or the other desktops could be patched to use the newer upower). signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20140404 changes
On 04/04/2014 01:17 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: On Friday, April 4, 2014, 1:42:49 PM, Matthew Milleru wrote: On Fri, Apr 04, 2014 at 11:32:57AM -0600, Michal Jaegermann wrote: As far as I am concerned they are very useful. In more detail I am looking mostly at Broken deps and Summaries, with only an occasional peek at a changelog information, but on a number of occasions these messages were crucial for me in disentangling broken dependencies on my rawhide installation and/or filing some packaging bugs. Without that information I would have a much harder time and either would add some spurious junk to bugzilla or would not bother at all. They seem mostly to just raise the noise. As opposed to what? As opposed to meaningful discussion generated intentionally by human collaborators. But it appears that quite a few people do find them beneficial, and that's all I was asking. Very beneficial. Knowing the state of Rawhide (based on changes, and what is known to be broken) seems like critical information for someone using or testing on Rawhide. Unfortunately, not all changes that affect other packages are announced in the fedora-announce list. Seeing replies to the rawhide report is usually a heads up that someone broke something. Putting these and other script-generated reports elsewhere just makes it harder for folks to keep track on what is happening. Al Like wise. The one change that might be nice would be to try would be to consolidate the broken deps a bit - just a single note that a package has broken dep in all arches (and listing those deps) rather than repeating three times. It also will not scale if we add more primary architectures. Where is the source for this mail? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Shipping .orig files
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/04/2014 12:45 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 04/04/2014 11:44 AM, Oden Eriksson wrote: fredagen den 4 april 2014 09.32.06 skrev Orion Poplawski: A number of rpms currently ship .orig files, which are presumably from patching the files in the spec. Would it make sense to have rpm complain about this? No, if -b is used there won't be a .orig file, unless it's named so. I'm not sure when this changed, but I just did the following experiment on nodejs-less (one of the identified packages from the original message): 1) Extract tarball 2) Validate that bin/lessc is the only file in the bin/ directory 3) patch -p1 0001-Require-include-files-from-the-default-location.patch 4) Look at bin/lessc: it created a .orig file Digging much deeper, it appears that this is because my patch applied with an offset. The default behavior of patch on Fedora appears to be --backup-if-mismatch, hence the creation of the .orig file. I'd be inclined to suggest that we may want to file a bug against redhat-rpm-macros and get the %patch macro updated to include --no-backup-if-mismatch in rpmbuild. Yeah, this is what I was seeing too. It's been suggested before apparently: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=884755 - -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlNAH0UACgkQORnzrtFC2/tV0wCgioVNySiBQ6o05x0KQ1KqIU0C f1QAn2Xbzz/pu8ckfH1AKASrVoa2yd+a =PAAC -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Packaging of libdb-6+
On 04/03/2014 11:08 AM, Jan Staněk wrote: as Oracle is unlikely to re-license the libdb6 back to GPL, Just to precise in such license matters, most of the code in older releases was covered by the Sleepycat license, a copyleft license generally thought to be compatible with the GPL (version 2), but distinct from it. -- Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction: Oden Eriksson
2014-04-03 7:50 GMT-03:00 Oden Eriksson o...@nux.se: Hello, Hi Oden, Small Linux world, isn't it ? :-) Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining packages for Mandriva Linux since 1999 and thought I should give it a try at fedora. First cut is this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962 And, it seems I need a sponsor here. Anyone? If nobody with MariaDB and MySQL expertise that already commented in your review request steps in, I will sponsor you. Cheers. Paulo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: rawhide report: 20140404 changes
On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:08:57 -0600 Orion Poplawski or...@cora.nwra.com wrote: Like wise. The one change that might be nice would be to try would be to consolidate the broken deps a bit - just a single note that a package has broken dep in all arches (and listing those deps) rather than repeating three times. It also will not scale if we add more primary architectures. Where is the source for this mail? I'm glad you asked. ;) The base calls are all in the buildrawhide script: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/buildrawhide#n195 basically it's the start time, the depcheck from /usr/share/mash/spam-o-matic (in the mash package) repodiff output from the previous day and finish time. So, the depcheck part is in mash: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/mash/tree/utils/spam-o-matic Ideas for better output welcome! kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Self Introduction: Oden Eriksson
mysterious remarkNot to speak of Norrbotten, a really small part of the world :) /mysterious remark --alec On 4/5/14, Paulo César Pereira de Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-04-03 7:50 GMT-03:00 Oden Eriksson o...@nux.se: Hello, Hi Oden, Small Linux world, isn't it ? :-) Been active with packaging, productization and maintaining packages for Mandriva Linux since 1999 and thought I should give it a try at fedora. First cut is this one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962 And, it seems I need a sponsor here. Anyone? If nobody with MariaDB and MySQL expertise that already commented in your review request steps in, I will sponsor you. Cheers. Paulo -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
On 04/04/2014 05:55 PM, Michal Schmidt wrote: Perhaps a versioned dependency on glib2 would be worth adding somewhere, but anyway I would not see this problem if this were a normal Fedora update, because then I'd get the package for both archs. Good idea. I've now added versioned dependencies to a few more places. However, while testing this, I noticed that COPR repo metadata includes all older versions of packages ever built in the COPR. This unfortunately means that DNF is free to pick older packages to satisfy dependencies if it can't work out a transaction with the latest version. For example, gtk3-3.12.0-2 now has a versioned dep on glib2(x86-64) = 2.40.0, but that doesn't help much if DNF ends up pulling in gtk3-3.12.0-1 instead :( -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update
On Sat, 2014-04-05 at 22:14 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: However, while testing this, I noticed that COPR repo metadata includes all older versions of packages ever built in the COPR. This unfortunately means that DNF is free to pick older packages to satisfy dependencies if it can't work out a transaction with the latest version. For example, gtk3-3.12.0-2 now has a versioned dep on glib2(x86-64) = 2.40.0, but that doesn't help much if DNF ends up pulling in gtk3-3.12.0-1 instead :( Like I said earlier, please use --best with dnf to force it to use the latest version. -- Thanks, Warm regards, Ankur (FranciscoD) http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha Join Fedora! Come talk to us! http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Join_SIG signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
samba and cifs-utils installed, but smbtree not found
Anyone know why? Is there some optional package providing smbtree now? -- The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation) Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks! Felix Miata *** http://fm.no-ip.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: samba and cifs-utils installed, but smbtree not found
On 04/05/2014 08:08 PM, Felix Miata wrote: Anyone know why? Is there some optional package providing smbtree now? # repoquery --disablerepo=\* --enablerepo=rawhide --whatprovides \ /usr/bin/smbtree samba-client-2:4.1.4-1.fc21.x86_64 -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall/f20] Modernize spec.
Summary of changes: dda05f6... Modernize spec. (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall/f19: 4/4] Merge cleanup.
commit ce04b4fefe38f8b01384899636641a49c223bdfd Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org Date: Sat Apr 5 08:26:15 2014 +0200 Merge cleanup. perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall.spec |6 -- 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall.spec b/perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall.spec index 9db8425..50b5b4a 100644 --- a/perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall.spec +++ b/perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall.spec @@ -50,12 +50,6 @@ make test - Rebase eai.patch (Avoid *.orig being packaged). - Fix bogus %%changelog entries. -* Sat Aug 03 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.63-22 -- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass_Rebuild - -* Wed Jul 24 2013 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.63-21 -- Perl 5.18 rebuild - * Thu Feb 14 2013 Fedora Release Engineering rel-...@lists.fedoraproject.org - 0.63-20 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_19_Mass_Rebuild -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-ExtUtils-AutoInstall/f19] (4 commits) ...Merge cleanup.
Summary of changes: 23be94a... Perl 5.18 rebuild (*) 1021106... - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_20_Mass (*) dda05f6... Modernize spec. (*) ce04b4f... Merge cleanup. (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-GnuPG-Interface
perl-GnuPG-Interface has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late) On i386: perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late) On armhfp: perl-GnuPG-Interface-0.50-1.fc21.noarch requires perl(MooX::late) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: mojomojo
mojomojo has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On i386: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) On armhfp: mojomojo-1.10-1.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::Element::reCAPTCHA) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu
perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm) On i386: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm) On armhfp: perl-Catalyst-Controller-HTML-FormFu-0.09004-4.fc20.noarch requires perl(HTML::FormFu::MultiForm) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Language-Expr
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On i386: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) On armhfp: perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File NetAddr-IP-4.073.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-NetAddr-IP: 4dc78e95809450100c1037cc10942fdf NetAddr-IP-4.073.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-NetAddr-IP] Update to 4.073
commit bc4d82290ccdbc409f674be67265224f506f5d61
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Sat Apr 5 19:44:22 2014 +0100
Update to 4.073
- New upstream release 4.073
- Add documentation about FQDN conversion and an option to disable
perl-NetAddr-IP.spec |6 +-
sources |2 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec b/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
index 0247d72..4513c0d 100644
--- a/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
+++ b/perl-NetAddr-IP.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-NetAddr-IP
-Version:4.072
+Version:4.073
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Manages IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and subnets
# Lite/Util/Util.xs is GPLv2+
@@ -57,6 +57,10 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/NetAddr::IP::UtilPP.3pm*
%changelog
+* Sat Apr 5 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 4.073-1
+- Update to 4.073
+ - Add documentation about FQDN conversion and an option to disable
+
* Tue Jan 28 2014 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 4.072-1
- Update to 4.072
- Modify Makefile.PL to bypass missing 'pod2text'
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 166b833..6f6ba55 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7764bf54881cd014880c0b77161f16aa NetAddr-IP-4.072.tar.gz
+4dc78e95809450100c1037cc10942fdf NetAddr-IP-4.073.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-NetAddr-IP] Created tag perl-NetAddr-IP-4.073-1.fc21
The lightweight tag 'perl-NetAddr-IP-4.073-1.fc21' was created pointing to: bc4d822... Update to 4.073 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Starman-0.4009.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by eseyman
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Starman: 584a48a7b46185dc87733959c582c2b4 Starman-0.4009.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Starman] Update to 0.4009
commit 798c55172f62aba54aa6136947ba38685488305a
Author: Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr
Date: Sun Apr 6 02:54:46 2014 +0200
Update to 0.4009
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Starman.spec |7 ++-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 2598e7c..2c751d7 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -13,3 +13,4 @@
/Starman-0.4004.tar.gz
/Starman-0.4006.tar.gz
/Starman-0.4008.tar.gz
+/Starman-0.4009.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Starman.spec b/perl-Starman.spec
index 40f22b3..0d38998 100644
--- a/perl-Starman.spec
+++ b/perl-Starman.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Starman
-Version:0.4008
+Version:0.4009
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:High-performance preforking PSGI/Plack web server
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -13,11 +13,13 @@ BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Date)
BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Parser::XS)
BuildRequires: perl(HTTP::Status)
+BuildRequires: perl(LWP::UserAgent)
BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build::Tiny)
BuildRequires: perl(Net::Server)
BuildRequires: perl(Net::Server::SS::PreFork)
BuildRequires: perl(parent)
BuildRequires: perl(Plack)
+BuildRequires: perl(Plack::Test)
BuildRequires: perl(Server::Starter)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::Requires)
@@ -59,6 +61,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {}
';'
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sun Apr 06 2014 Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr - 0.4009-1
+- Update to 0.4009
+
* Sun Sep 15 2013 Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr - 0.4008-1
- Update to 0.4008
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 17e9c7b..ec22104 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-d0bdd61ffe89671655d017395c933ab4 Starman-0.4008.tar.gz
+584a48a7b46185dc87733959c582c2b4 Starman-0.4009.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Class-DBI
perl-Class-DBI has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Class-DBI-3.0.17-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Class::Trigger) = 0:0.07 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Devel
perl-Catalyst-Devel has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.28-1.el6.1.noarch requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-4.el6.x86_64 requires libsal_textenc.so.3()(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-DBIx-Class
perl-DBIx-Class has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-DBIx-Class-0.08123-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Class::Trigger) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO
perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-4.el6.x86_64 requires libsal_textenc.so.3()(64bit) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-DBIx-Class
perl-DBIx-Class has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-DBIx-Class-0.08123-2.el6.noarch requires perl(Class::Trigger) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Authen-Simple
perl-Authen-Simple has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Authen-Simple-0.4-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Crypt::PasswdMD5) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Catalyst-Devel
perl-Catalyst-Devel has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Catalyst-Devel-1.28-1.el6.1.noarch requires perl(File::Copy::Recursive) Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-Class-DBI
perl-Class-DBI has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: perl-Class-DBI-3.0.17-5.el6.noarch requires perl(Class::Trigger) = 0:0.07 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-WWW-GoodData
perl-WWW-GoodData has broken dependencies in the epel-5 tree: On ppc: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 On i386: perl-WWW-GoodData-1.6-1.el5.noarch requires perl(Getopt::Long) = 0:2.36 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
