Re: Review Swap

2014-07-24 Thread Sergio Pascual
Hi Erik, I have these two python packages I would like to get reviewd. I
will take yours

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109751
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117906


2014-07-24 5:08 GMT+01:00 Erik Johnson :

> I have a couple new python packages I'd like to get reviewed, does
> anyone have something they need reviewed?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328
>
> Note: The above submissions have undergone a few changes, so view the
> latest post in each for updated links to the spec and SRPM.
>
> --
>
> Erik Johnson | Engineer
>
> 2825 E. Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 360 | Salt Lake City, UT 84121
> e...@saltstack.com | http://saltstack.com
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
>
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Changes in schedule - Fedora 21 to slip three weeks

2014-07-24 Thread Jaroslav Reznik
Greetings,!
as you probably noticed, Fedora 21 is still not frozen (Alpha Change
Deadline was planned for this Tuesday, 2014-07-22), due to several
issues we hit while working on the Alpha release (incomplete test
composes etc).

There's also Flock being held in the beginning of August (2014-08-06 -
2014-08-09) [1] in Prague and many contributors would like to enjoy
this event instead of being trapped in the release windmills. I hope
to meet you all there!  

Therefore, on yesterday's FESCo meeting (2014-07-23), it was decided [2]
to slip Fedora 21 by three weeks including the Alpha Change Deadline.

2014-08-12 Alpha Change Deadline
2014-08-26 Alpha Release

With final Fedora 21 release planned on 2014-11-04. For more details,
see updated Fedora 21 Schedule [3].

Jaroslav

[1] http://flocktofedora.com/
[2] https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1178#comment:53
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21/Schedule
___
devel-announce mailing list
devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel-announce
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: PkgDB, pending ACL requests

2014-07-24 Thread Pierre-Yves Chibon
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning everyone!
> > > 
> > > In the version 1.13 of pkgdb2 a new API endpoint has been added that just
> > > provide the list of pending ACL requests:
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/pendingacls
> > > 
> > > I just wanted to share with you the first line of its output:
> > >   
> > >   # Number of requests pending: 5492
> > 
> > Today we are at: 
> > 
> ># Number of requests pending: 5410
> > 
> > So there is some improvements :)
> 
> Today's number is:
> 
> # Number of requests pending: 5151
> 
> We got 341 requests that have been either accepted, rejected of withdrawn over
> the last two weeks, but we still have some pending :)
> 
> So don't forget to visit:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/

I found out yesterday that this list contains pending ACL requests for package
that have been retired.
So I fix this in 1.18 (just deployed), so we're down to:

  # Number of requests pending: 4744

Pierre
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

F-21 Branched report: 20140724 changes

2014-07-24 Thread Fedora Branched Report
Compose started at Thu Jul 24 07:15:03 UTC 2014

Broken deps for armhfp
--
[APLpy]
APLpy-0.9.8-5.fc21.noarch requires pywcs
[PyKDE]
PyKDE-3.16.6-14.fc20.armv7hl requires sip-api(10) >= 0:10.0
[audtty]
audtty-0.1.12-9.fc20.armv7hl requires libaudclient.so.2
[csound]
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libgcj_bc.so.1
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires java-gcj-compat
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires java-gcj-compat
csound-java-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires java-1.5.0-gcj
csound-tk-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libtk8.5.so
csound-tk-5.19.01-1.fc20.armv7hl requires libtcl8.5.so
[deltacloud-core]
deltacloud-core-rackspace-1.1.3-1.fc20.noarch requires 
rubygem(cloudfiles)
[dragonegg]
dragonegg-3.4-0.3.rc0.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[eclipse-jbosstools]
eclipse-jbosstools-jst-4.1.1-2.fc21.noarch requires eclipse-wtp-jst-web
eclipse-jbosstools-ws-4.1.1-2.fc21.noarch requires 
osgi(org.eclipse.jst.ws.annotations.core)
[edelib]
edelib-2.1-4.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
edelib-devel-2.1-4.fc21.armv7hl requires libedelib.so
[eucalyptus]
eucalyptus-common-java-3.3.0-0.5.20130408git32052445.fc20.armv7hl 
requires hibernate3-jbosscache >= 0:3.6.10-7
[fatrat]
1:fatrat-1.2.0-0.20.beta2.fc21.armv7hl requires libgloox.so.11
[flashrom]
flashrom-0.9.6.1-5.svn1705.fc20.armv7hl requires libftdi.so.1
[gcc-python-plugin]
gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python2-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libpython3.3dm.so.1.0
gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 
0:4.8.2-14.fc21
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires libpython3.3m.so.1.0
gcc-python3-plugin-0.12-18.fc21.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.8.2-14.fc21
[gedit-valencia]
gedit-valencia-0.4.0-1.20131223git94442bf.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libvala-0.24.so.0
[gnome-python2-desktop]
gnome-python2-metacity-2.32.0-18.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libmetacity-private.so.0
[gofer]
ruby-gofer-0.77.1-2.fc21.noarch requires rubygem(qpid) >= 0:0.16.0
[golang-github-smarterclayton-go-systemd]

golang-github-smarterclayton-go-systemd-devel-0-0.5.git5cb9e9e.fc21.noarch 
requires golang(github.com/guelfey/go.dbus)
[grass]
grass-6.4.3-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libtk8.5.so
grass-6.4.3-5.fc21.armv7hl requires libtcl8.5.so
[hibernate-search]
hibernate-search-4.5.1-4.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.avro:avro)
[ice]
ice-php-3.5.1-4.fc21.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 0:20121212-32
ice-php-3.5.1-4.fc21.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20121113-32
[leiningen]
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires maven-ant-tasks
leiningen-1.7.1-7.fc20.noarch requires classworlds
[libghemical]
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libf77blas.so.3
libghemical-2.99.1-24.fc20.armv7hl requires libatlas.so.3
[libopensync-plugin-irmc]
1:libopensync-plugin-irmc-0.22-7.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenobex.so.1
[licq]
licq-1.8.2-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libgloox.so.11
[ltsp]
ltsp-client-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires fuse-unionfs
ltsp-server-5.4.5-8.fc21.armv7hl requires cdialog
[mapserver]
mapserver-java-6.2.1-7.fc21.armv7hl requires java-gcj-compat
[meshmagick]
meshmagick-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
meshmagick-libs-0.6.0-20.svn2898.fc21.armv7hl requires 
libOgreMain.so.1.8.1
[monodevelop-vala]
monodevelop-vala-2.8.8.1-6.fc21.armv7hl requires vala < 0:0.25.0
[netdisco]
netdisco-1.1-7.fc21.noarch requires perl(SNMP::Info::Layer2::Bay)
[openvas-client]
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_omp.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_nasl.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_misc.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_hg.so.6
openvas-client-3.0.3-8.fc20.armv7hl requires libopenvas_base.so.6
[orsa]
orsa-0.7.0-28.fc21.armv7hl requires libginac.so.2
orsa-mpich-0.7.0-28.fc21.armv7hl requires libginac.so.2
orsa-openmpi-0.7.0-28.fc21.armv7hl requires libginac.so.2
[php-pecl-parsekit]
php-pecl-parsekit-1.3.0-5.fc21.armv7hl requires php(zend-abi) = 
0:20121212-32
php-pecl-parsekit-1.3.0-5.fc21.armv7hl requires php(api) = 0:20121113-32
[razorqt]
libqtxdg-devel-0.5.3-1.fc21.armv7hl requires libqtxdg(armv7hl-32) = 
0:0.5.3-1
lightdm-razorqt-0.5.2-15.fc21.armv7hl requires razorqt-data = 
0:0.5.3-1.fc21
razorqt-about-0.5.2-15.fc21.armv7hl requires razorqt-data = 
0:0.5.3-1.fc21
razorqt-appswitcher-0.5.2-

Re: PkgDB, pending ACL requests

2014-07-24 Thread Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
2014-07-24 6:46 GMT-03:00 Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>> > > Good Morning everyone!
>> > >
>> > > In the version 1.13 of pkgdb2 a new API endpoint has been added that just
>> > > provide the list of pending ACL requests:
>> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/pendingacls
>> > >
>> > > I just wanted to share with you the first line of its output:
>> > >
>> > >   # Number of requests pending: 5492
>> >
>> > Today we are at:
>> >
>> ># Number of requests pending: 5410
>> >
>> > So there is some improvements :)
>>
>> Today's number is:
>>
>> # Number of requests pending: 5151
>>
>> We got 341 requests that have been either accepted, rejected of withdrawn 
>> over
>> the last two weeks, but we still have some pending :)
>>
>> So don't forget to visit:
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
>
> I found out yesterday that this list contains pending ACL requests for package
> that have been retired.
> So I fix this in 1.18 (just deployed), so we're down to:
>
>   # Number of requests pending: 4744

  A small suggestion could be for the person making a request to add
a small comment about the reason of it being asked.

  I have 2 pending commit acl requests (to 0ad) that I did not deny
because I thought it could be unpolite, but was not contacted in irc
or email (or possibly missed the request).

> Pierre

Thanks,
Paulo
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Help with reviewing OBS packages needed

2014-07-24 Thread Josef Stribny
There are some more:

capybara_minitest_spec
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122940
font-awesome-rails
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122941
jquery-ui-rails
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122939
jquery-datatables-rails
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122944


If you want to swap a review, just shoot:).

Regards
Josef

- Original Message -
From: "Josef Stribny" 
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 
, "Ruby SIG mailing list" 

Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 12:43:34 PM
Subject: Help with reviewing OBS packages needed

Hi all,

I am packaging OBS for fedora and would like to get in many of
the RubyGem dependencies for the OBS frontend. If you could help
me and do a review or swap a review, that would be great.

So far I packaged:

pundit
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121085
cocoon
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121084
clockwork
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121082
codemirror-rails
  https://github.com/fixlr/codemirror-rails/issues/28
  https://github.com/fixlr/codemirror-rails/issues/29
cssmin
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121081
sprite-factory
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121080
websocket-driver
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121075
cliver
  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121074

Big thanks!
Josef
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Bug 1099382] perl-Mail-SPF-2.9.0-3.fc21 FTBS: tests fail: Unknown error on DNS 'A' lookup

2014-07-24 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099382

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|st...@silug.org |ppi...@redhat.com



--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar  ---
The upstream looks dead. Debian posted a fix there. I will apply it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ytBVVlEAXB&a=cc_unsubscribe
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: bioinformatics

2014-07-24 Thread Martin Preisler
- Original Message -
> From: "Haïkel" 
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" 
> 
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2014 4:29:44 PM
> Subject: Re: Unresponsive maintainer: bioinformatics
> 
> 2014-07-18 15:38 GMT+02:00 Martin Preisler :
> > Anybody knows how to contact Mercier Jonathan? FAS name: bioinformatics
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=966983
> >
> 
> He was on irc, last week. Did you try email-ing him ?

Yes, he was CC-ed in the original message. He replied off-list for some reason 
but nothing happened since then. I am CC-ing him again, hoping to finally move 
the bug forward.

-- 
Martin Preisler
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: defining firewalld services

2014-07-24 Thread Jiri Popelka

On 07/16/2014 04:04 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 08:39:08AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

Looks like it's as easy as dropping an xml snippet into
/usr/lib/firewalld/services/

I'm also noticing currently that the only package besides fallwalld itself
doing this is cockpit, which includes a %post scriptlet:

# firewalld only partially picks up changes to its services files
# without this
test -f %{_bindir}/firewall-cmd && firewall-cmd --reload --quiet || true


Can we wrap this in a macro provided by firewalld.rpm? This will make
updates later on easier.


Added upstream:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/firewalld.git/commit/?id=9200667fd6f43b7375a309a7130d97da7309d403

Will be in next firewalld release, thanks for the idea.

--
Jiri
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: bioinformatics

2014-07-24 Thread Haïkel
Hi,

I had some news 5 days ago, he was on a professional travel in Portugal.

@Jonathan: could you answer Martin, please ?

I don't know the whole context, but I think that you - I mean both of
you - should start a thread on this list about the aforementioned
ticket. btw, please notice that through copr, you may provide
alternative versions of glfw (ie: git snapshots)

Regards,
H.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: defining firewalld services

2014-07-24 Thread Jiri Popelka

On 07/24/2014 04:35 PM, Jiri Popelka wrote:

Added upstream:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/firewalld.git/commit/?id=9200667fd6f43b7375a309a7130d97da7309d403


and :-)
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/firewalld.git/commit/?id=445a1475a671ff5c9e9cc905e7e74e9fa3c800dc

--
Jiri
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Review Swap

2014-07-24 Thread Erik Johnson

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:21:53AM +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote:

Hi Erik, I have these two python packages I would like to get reviewd. I
will take yours

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109751
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117906




I have reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117906,
there are some things that need to be cleared up. I will review the
other one tomorrow.


2014-07-24 5:08 GMT+01:00 Erik Johnson :


I have a couple new python packages I'd like to get reviewed, does
anyone have something they need reviewed?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113328

Note: The above submissions have undergone a few changes, so view the
latest post in each for updated links to the spec and SRPM.

--

Erik Johnson | Engineer

2825 E. Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 360 | Salt Lake City, UT 84121
e...@saltstack.com | http://saltstack.com

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct




--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct



--

Erik Johnson | Engineer

2825 E. Cottonwood Parkway, Suite 360 | Salt Lake City, UT 84121
e...@saltstack.com | http://saltstack.com


pgphTzwWr3nyH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct