Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 16:11 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Mon, 2015-03-16 at 15:25 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Other examples might be preview releases of certain software that are not yet stable enough to be in Fedora proper or whose installation might be too disruptive during a stable lifecycle. Like for example the recent GNOME 3.12 repositories for Fedora 20 users since we had the long cycle. This is a bad example IMO. We are not set up to handle coprs that include essential system packages. If you try to remove the gnome- 3.12 copr with gnome-software, it just uninstalls your desktop environment and leaves you with a broken computer. Good point. I forgot to account for the lack of a way to back out of it when I listed that. Installing a single application that's not in Fedora from a copr is one thing, or a newer version of an application, but not if they are core system packages. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
On 17 March 2015 at 11:18, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote: Personally, I don't like the semantics of these semi-disabled repos. It beats the purpose of disabling the repos in the first place, doesn't it? disabled=0 means don't download packages or metadata which means if we search for chromium nothing is displayed. semi-disabled means download metadata only which allows us to show search results but with a prompt of some sort before enabling the repo properly so we can install from it. Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
On Mar 17, 2015 5:18 AM, Jan Zelený jzel...@redhat.com wrote: On 16. 3. 2015 at 15:52:10, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport Change owner(s): Richard Hughes rhughes at redhat dot com The Software tool and PackageKit now support disabled repositories to help users locate software in additional repositories which are not meant to be enabled by default. * This Change is announced after the Change Submission Deadline as an exception to the process. May not be approved for proposed Fedora release. * == Detailed Description == This feature aims to reduce the technical hurdles for users and developers to locate software packaged for a distribution, but which needs to be clearly identified as not officially included (or possibly sanctioned) by that distribution. When Software (via PackageKit) queries a repo definition that contains the line enabled_metadata=1, even if the repo is disabled, it will download repodata. This feature allows a user to locate software in response to a search. If the user wants to install the software, she receives a dialog with information that the repo must be enabled to satisfy the request, and if relevant, information about the nature of the software (for instance, if it is non- libre). N.B. This feature does not currently operate in Fedora, since no such repo definitions are currently shipped. However, the feature could be used by remixers, and in the future in Fedora in the event of a policy change. == Scope == * Proposal owners: Include enhancements in gnome-software/PackageKit (done) * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) ** Note: For this feature to be used in Fedora requires an additional *- release-extra package to ship disabled repo definition * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) ** Note: For this feature to be used in Fedora requires clearer approval from FESCo and the Council I wonder, are there any implications for dnf in terms of being consistent with the new behavior of Gnome Software? I realize that people using dnf have more options than people using Gnome Software (--enablerepo for instance) but this sounds like the beginning of the end of disabled repositories. Personally, I don't like the semantics of these semi-disabled repos. It beats the purpose of disabling the repos in the first place, doesn't it? I mean I don't get why user would specify enabled_metadata=1 when he can achieve almost the same result with disabled=0 (the only difference I can see is one additional popup dialog). Or is there something I'm missing? Thanks Jan -- As I understand it, the intent is to provide the user with the experience of third party software being included in Fedora, while still complying with the third party repository policy and communicating to the user that it comes from somewhere else. As I understand it, the council stance is that each repo must be a self-contained piece of software, and each individual repo must have explicit council approval to be included, with a mandate for furthering Fedora's mission and an expectation of permissive licensing. In that context, I guess I'm ok with the compromise. jreznik, what about cycling these approvals through the Change process, but instead of going to Fesco, the tickets go to the council? That would allow a sufficient amount of community scrutiny and signal, IMO. The Change template would only need to be modified slightly, probably not more than current interpretations do. --Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
I wonder, are there any implications for dnf in terms of being consistent with the new behavior of Gnome Software? Wait, the metadata download and search code is not shared? What would it take to make it so? /me wonders how many unicorns and kittens will have to die before we get rid of all this dupli^Wtriplication. Mirek -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[PkgDB] psabata:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Approved
user: psabata set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: f22 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] psabata:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Approved
user: psabata set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: f20 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] psabata:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Approved
user: psabata set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: f21 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[EPEL-devel] Current update policy?
What is the current update policy for EPEL? The stated one seems to be along the lines of no major changes ( http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy ) but it seems more like whatever the packager is willing to maintain is the actual policy. I ask because a bugzilla was just opened against a package I maintain ( https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201808 ) and I wanted to know how I should handle it. Does it need to be closed as wontfix? Or should a notice of upcoming major update policy be put in place to handle things like this? Thanks, Dave ___ epel-devel mailing list epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: [Fedora QA] #468: Fedora 22 Translation (L10n) Test Day
#468: Fedora 22 Translation (L10n) Test Day ---+--- Reporter: anipeter | Owner: pschindl Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Test Day |Version: Resolution:| Keywords: Blocked By:| Blocking: ---+--- Comment (by anipeter): Thank you Adam for pointing this out. Robert has fixed it : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2015-03-17_Translation_%28l10n%29 Ani Replying to [comment:3 adamwill]: There's a problem with the page name for this event: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FLTG/Test_Day:2015-03-17_Translation_%28l10n%29 Test Day:Foo is not just a naming convention. 'Test Day' is a mediawiki 'namespace' - https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Namespaces - which has certain impacts on searches and stuff. Fedora's wiki is set up such that pages in the 'Test Day' namespace (like the 'Test Results' namespace) can be edited by non-logged-in users, making it easier for outside testers to help with Test Days. 'FLTG/Test_Day' is not a namespace, so it's just part of the page name. That means this page is inconsistent with all other test day pages and also means that testers without a Fedora account won't be able to submit results. I think it'd be best to move the page to the standard name: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2015-03-17_Translation_%28l10n%29 mediawiki will redirect from the old URL to the new one, so existing announcements should not cause a problem. Thanks! -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/468#comment:4 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
Re: [Fedora QA] #468: Fedora 22 Translation (L10n) Test Day
#468: Fedora 22 Translation (L10n) Test Day ---+--- Reporter: anipeter | Owner: pschindl Type: defect| Status: new Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22 Component: Test Day |Version: Resolution:| Keywords: Blocked By:| Blocking: ---+--- Changes (by anipeter): * cc: lijli@… (added) -- Ticket URL: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa/ticket/468#comment:5 Fedora QA http://fedorahosted.org/fedora-qa Fedora Quality Assurance ___ qa-devel mailing list qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/qa-devel
[Bug 1174951] installing vim pulls in 30 perl packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174951 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-5.20.2-323.fc23 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-03-17 02:57:12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=fbfxYlzKuRa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Broken dependencies: perl-PDL
perl-PDL has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.x86_64 requires libproj.so.0()(64bit) On i386: perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.i686 requires libproj.so.0 On armhfp: perl-PDL-2.7.0-8.fc22.armv7hl requires libproj.so.0 Please resolve this as soon as possible. -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1199972] perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc23 FTBFS: Can't use string (320) as an ARRAY ref while strict refs in use at t/overrides.t line 235.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199972 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc23 |perl-Gtk3-0.019-1.fc23 |FBTFS: Can't use string |FTBFS: Can't use string |(320) as an ARRAY ref |(320) as an ARRAY ref |while strict refs in use |while strict refs in use |at t/overrides.t line 235. |at t/overrides.t line 235. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=dTYmKs6kdEa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
efl review swap?
I sure could use a review on efl so that we can update Enlightenment to 0.19. Will swap for a review, or other Fedora related bribery. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175952 ~tom == Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[389-devel] Please review: [389 Project] #48134: Directory Server Admin Console: plaintext password logged in debug mode
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48134 https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/48134/0001-Ticket-48134-Directory-Server-Admin-Console-plaintex.patch -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Self Introduction: Török Edwin
Hi all, I am introducing myself according to [1]. As the co-founder of Skylable [2] I am working on building Open Source cloud storage software: Skylable SX and LibreS3. As an Open Source enthusiast I have contributed to various Free and Open Source Software projects including: ClamAV, LLVM/Clang, LLVM Linux, Linux, Mesa3D, zlib, and various OCaml software [3][4] My dedication to open-source can also be seen in the numerous bug-reports filed for GCC, OCaml and other projects. My skills include OCaml/C development and systems programming. I use a variety of OS for various purposes including Fedora, Debian, CentOS and OpenBSD. I have just been sponsored into the packager group by Tom spot Callaway, many thanks for taking the time to review my package! [5]. Best regards, --Edwin [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Introduce_yourself [2] http://www.skylable.com/company/ [3] https://www.openhub.net/accounts/edwin/positions [4] https://github.com/edwintorok [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193175 [6] My GPG key is attached -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK- Version: GnuPG v2 mQINBE/XmuABEADfU5X//TvfxULrckWhv9zTJeBjZZJfzUv4jP8uCXHdLccD6e+P xyZ7Z5CfY2rvkDgmDCtso0r7qax9oimb98vzsxzBXaOFw6Sx+y9dO4zYE34imxxU LJGNiOSm2FKoc0UFbxPlb1/Les/yFpr9KE/bftC0gFQE1uF0QKKtiUqfNiJVPtDL RX4nWjeSf21WvsZOcsyUczDsC8tEsPWLw1RnXEqzoZTZ7Uukch7YnqMGpbwSgOrN HmrTQvuNtcsiuqibLwizsb6e8vY1OWZ/YKSZ6UBloNYNHSXmO5kFGbeaFu/6CnLF oE8DZxIAMA2hVB66J+vV5KP8hn4kcPgCm1Z9Dm0K0SkAaPLcxiVnzGCJP6fqDwBI z9Wt2eYBfvQ2FHBGzkmFBt7gXdztAkEffWOC/Y5XR1lxXbiQdTx2a871DJTc4CMA ChNI6yP6Zjibzcm2okgKPrY4BJWojg0riqtBxA+LVjRspcm9SnQosBDRrCKgglro wYhbD040WIxc8x7il/YmwFwC+/X2hfQPPGf0U/lxXpA6+gissGhbDZpzV1G3O3uI Ku1IWZVdN5XQOjmGP/osqGPueL3JtQv56Z29HuEpJnH7NxRwKlhK0Ug0HbP5fn4K 6CqRHTO+zoXy0qbOy31arbrqJ/8zy0Y8K74rjxAcS3XQeOE9rxsJreoH7wARAQAB tCBUw7Zyw7ZrIEVkd2luIDxlZHdpbkBldG9yb2submV0PokCXQQTAQoARwIbAwUJ CWYBgAULCQgHAwUVCgkICwUWAgMBAAIeAQIXgAIZAQUCUaT6TBwYaGtwOi8va2Vy Y2tob2Zmcy5zdXJmbmV0Lm5sAAoJEIFKOnoGqhKV9jQQAIv0q5i0XFVta8WWnM6i SlqTJQNMI42gltozTaGI+sVJJSgM1Jh/f3OufAi0PV4vuvJJ7KqGZwAjDbMmLZZH 3DlpDJnYxLRsbbVv5HOitIyheYYbyrpGeqrbChVNmYsA/Lfy/QjzPsmXuReOUSzC 8dVrcSWl1kw5F6CcLiOSvOlsyaDO4wwQj7n0JLrzH4vz7N9FcIefv4DKWhucxshI Cn/myXgcwb8umA9/3qftt2D+PYJWdM0Ks2wwAnxg5GlZwxW//6OqICyqFyR4zlrF S0bVyjPWdkskuFodjenZdSJFZ1+sf5H+RvaUkuZ1INrdmIM4ef+A+firz08AzVCl E9pNnGo2Zq5Q3LsubNCCy0EJ//fNep0qZnfKyYp6BrmR3vnRMcgXPvu8MSre8M1H 9N/sY8Fsh1IPSSg8mqz4TDS/K6nQu9VC02tk3CdVDhZw6xBMrvMCVrg+/1YsPGfG DJqTPftasRf26lLGoFCvo2x85q8aK6RPS65LiKOZhggdCua+o1Rd8XUVRzcWb28m 8Lncr6zRH7RKNQAtf+peaZ+CrFnMvJ68EP8nBkdMdva5ED+WDBJYFF3g3BXgZuVJ R43yPspXXnLaCQJdWypVxYvPyCSb6X7MPHRyelpuCa1yB6aBPXDmBV6YO/rpiEQm 6p6V3vColcPtVWMSA+j/k8hSiEoEEBEKAAoFAk/Xp/QDBQV4AAoJEAV0HWmYhMQ0 O/wAn255W1Nrj4Q8mbOIAHPBr8wno+GhAJ9mQMQE7rUmnjoNTbNqjKqhqQnjsYhG BBARAgAGBQJP2HJsAAoJEGJ3j/Re/FWCnkgAniigGivmynWA7PnEt8nzSsTGfFNe AJ9Rbacs082FPDz3am4rrM5erjC4TokBHAQTAQoABgUCT9mlowAKCRDPqH/hU3mW XUV3CACGvGTGkepR11CgqdFz1wagUaoB3YXqtkPMqv5NxYqIilWy1+sUirgAJHrX nPOJ7USh9IRlSxYW1/QzPFOhd/DXS70vCQT9kylF8NngX1lVs6jxwIu6yDo63hNg R5cr9UbqSeoe3qVJO0WGTBh8v1UMY0AHV+c8UAO12Ovp4lry56OVkRCZ76+t0jY0 7Qp0ZIi+NUABuhmZOk1fDNsCKFaoOk/dyLkTIM9vjGtP4LSFZBMXScxy3y8hswkN Et5zxO3cgt8YiBGSJLGJuDxHGZVFh8cgQNRHgC8eMld1liBgaaxA4FAGS1WyF2e4 YgmCmASWm7E41kbDdwc4xC8EYdL5iEYEEBECAAYFAk/Z1WcACgkQVIItyJhaREvs 2wCdEWYUCxmmdrgVnl0y7xWM82qWNVQAnjdePEs6ECsAOCSzHl13UeMADXwxiQEi BBABAgAMBQJRlzw2BQMAEnUAAAoJEJcQuJvKV618nQMH/0nFTfHLZyYOFCYIoWDB oPO9me5msHJdtJNVLs1ptTCu7liNPKusn5eGuHe7jXwpJ4I8FtEruNTp+nACEDpg Br9GX/wNV6uSWQwbCl6yAea3yRj+g+BgkYqTCEyBtDmRILJRe5UQcBeEF9cz0Lwj tRyd5JC80ajj/95wAk53HUjNZ5j1NLMsV625Jispf+GIPeiO3jd7Cj9C59nyQWhS 7eh781SwVsSVP9Oc1mgAuQDl0RVgwh+hYgvMbR2Q6Haw7jks6aD6yLb4cmchfGJy BKnaFe/rvbxiajr2P1xTmX0OZr8hsB023Iz8tyca4S1yMTS7uHgRbg+M4fu22PZX zpGJASAEEAEKAAoFAk/Xp9gDBQV4AAoJEM+of+FTeZZdZFQIAI2tZ95BlueLCexT 5P+n16kB/JBtb0B1sruffbLWnb9NhLJJ9DQGXYeX6zsLOAKul4gmunI/MKZNa6XP 21tSXbgKyqkL0oidjZGe0s8pOMer51TC4B8Qkkj0oHCW1jYibx2ldTo/FIgm9rTr zXE2ZYlJLWhXJ8G7Rum0DSZqEL4Jn849eUXnbfPVCyBEQS7TMuvd1umeCcsFRcNU 4bcFCbdbVwgOrcdcIDbg07bvcC9bBY85k5oO1+sQrz6++f65lPYTbRO70Sl5nR5z RFUIXG6zwSG/2GsCRnLU9QGDlxghWeWwHs8JqLnbS7QgNQwcBQw4Y+0qNZ/C3R95 yZrje12JASIEEAECAAwFAk/XqNIFAwASdQAACgkQlxC4m8pXrXzEogf/fti4UuCC W82bokfDInKIPnH7hv3Q2a1CapHB5bTu8O0r4ym6n+N5E0KGUZWrptMYWfYxtL2J 2N8Y0BKpWIEFQDkLnzfLNU+YknUTNVFINjNxBO2VV4elcV1HXNj0nMrOLMou+gsv Y073LSCaPCbJgUvo5PyFNihFV1eUUUuM/WwaM0m09g1IovVL1Raoxe9VI3k33dKP axJwGqbXxEsoojXEgL2tW5HJZ5WCwgefNYGYJ928vA5ScseXOqMhoIqZoXhXpfbo riyxZG6EbcgzKqcFuAydGgoekEHgtLrdqmZSiMy4GHnWlCNVx9HQAARmt/yxljVB UzGzwDMHTkekuYkBIgQQAQIADAUCT+lhnQUDABJ1AAAKCRCXELibyletfI1zCACJ AUgNblN4IKvDH8rgicgTU7CxILNlxG9bFXNO8cs6I86k/Rup9u1Uc3ZHiNAFXq0P 99KUNEXbnmj2nHnjyj0nLbY/mBrT+G3P0ITobIlh8V1usZfyzPdO25Knbj9hJfE6 k1lDdCWbZJIu1MKtoyf2JD1v2cSwZKUxzoc4J5/mGRVDdY+LcaylJr24CGvTSDCE pt8Z1rNoSnkvoLdnsQVapSkc9CkKYyDmKaqmbQeBstU38lTia0U8+qsjYZS00AIo mA861bRsOqXybx/pFbn/wlPlXmibZ7IbgoPYYjDM/nQUF6DEjeiG1egRFPK5cr//
[perl-Net-DBus/f22] Update to 1.1.0 release
Summary of changes: d06f9cb... Update to 1.1.0 release (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load-Conditional watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Load-Conditional from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load-Conditional -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Module-Load from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Module-Load from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-IPC-Cmd watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-IPC-Cmd from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IPC-Cmd -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Awaiting Review
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: to: Awaiting Review on branch: f22 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Load from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-IPC-Cmd watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-IPC-Cmd from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IPC-Cmd -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-YAML-Tiny] Created tag perl-YAML-Tiny-1.66-1.fc23
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-Tiny-1.66-1.fc23' was created pointing to: b6d6f07... Update to 1.66 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-YAML-Tiny/f22] Update to 1.66
Summary of changes: b6d6f07... Update to 1.66 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Awaiting Review
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: to: Awaiting Review on branch: f21 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Awaiting Review
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: to: Awaiting Review on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Awaiting Review
user: pghmcfc set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: to: Awaiting Review on branch: f20 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load-Conditional watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Module-Load-Conditional from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load-Conditional -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-IPC-Cmd watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-IPC-Cmd from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IPC-Cmd -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Params-Check watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Params-Check from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Params-Check -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Params-Check watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Params-Check from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Params-Check -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load-Conditional watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Module-Load-Conditional from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load-Conditional -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Load from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Params-Check watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Params-Check from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Params-Check -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Module-Load-Conditional watchbugzilla set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchbugzilla of package: perl-Module-Load-Conditional from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Module-Load-Conditional -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-IPC-Cmd watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-IPC-Cmd from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el5 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-IPC-Cmd -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[PkgDB] pghmcfc:perl-Params-Check watchcommits set to Approved
user: pghmcfc set for iburrell acl: watchcommits of package: perl-Params-Check from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: el6 To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-Params-Check -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-YAML-Tiny] Created tag perl-YAML-Tiny-1.66-1.fc22
The lightweight tag 'perl-YAML-Tiny-1.66-1.fc22' was created pointing to: b6d6f07... Update to 1.66 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-YAML-Tiny] Update to 1.66
commit b6d6f07ba7fcc5180c7fcd931f3c399b9536cab7
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Mar 17 10:45:47 2015 +
Update to 1.66
- New upstream release 1.66
- Removed bundled Test::TempDir::Tiny to rely on File::Temp for temporary
directories during testing
- Revert to ExtUtils::MakeMaker flow
perl-YAML-Tiny.spec | 23 +++
sources | 2 +-
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-YAML-Tiny.spec b/perl-YAML-Tiny.spec
index b9cad91..f2a5fb7 100644
--- a/perl-YAML-Tiny.spec
+++ b/perl-YAML-Tiny.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-YAML-Tiny
-Version:1.65
+Version:1.66
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Read/Write YAML files with as little code as possible
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/E/ET/ETHER/YAML-Tiny-%{ve
BuildArch: noarch
# Module Build
BuildRequires: perl
-BuildRequires: perl(Module::Build::Tiny) = 0.039
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
# Module Runtime
BuildRequires: perl(B)
BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
@@ -20,12 +20,11 @@ BuildRequires: perl(strict)
# Test Suite
BuildRequires: perl(blib)
BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.120900
-BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Basename)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec) = 0.80
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions)
-BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) = 0.19
BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long)
BuildRequires: perl(IO::Dir)
BuildRequires: perl(JSON::MaybeXS) = 1.001000
@@ -55,14 +54,16 @@ memory overhead.
%setup -q -n YAML-Tiny-%{version}
%build
-perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor
-./Build
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-./Build install --destdir=%{buildroot} --create_packlist=0
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} ';'
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
%check
-./Build test
+make test
%files
%license LICENSE
@@ -71,6 +72,12 @@ perl Build.PL --installdirs=vendor
%{_mandir}/man3/YAML::Tiny.3*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 17 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.66-1
+- Update to 1.66
+ - Removed bundled Test::TempDir::Tiny to rely on File::Temp for temporary
+directories during testing
+- Revert to ExtUtils::MakeMaker flow
+
* Sat Mar 14 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 1.65-1
- Update to 1.65
- Artifacts left behind from testing are now cleaned up (GH#34)
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 107f66c..9233af5 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-7a201d492e2cb2044df5548bd9a73773 YAML-Tiny-1.65.tar.gz
+1222e6ddfcd088dcd7cd2bed0008ddc0 YAML-Tiny-1.66.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File YAML-Tiny-1.66.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-YAML-Tiny: 1222e6ddfcd088dcd7cd2bed0008ddc0 YAML-Tiny-1.66.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: [EPEL-devel] Fwd: [Fedora-packaging] %license for EPEL6
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:34:10 -0600
Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com wrote:
This was on the packaging list but effects EPEL. Any suggestions?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
Date: 17 March 2015 at 10:59
Subject: [Fedora-packaging] %license for EPEL6
To: Fedora Packaging list packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I have a package that can be build on all Fedora branches and on EPEL
6 and 7 with the same spec file. It uses
%{!?_pkgdocdir: %global _pkgdocdir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}}
and copies all docs to this %_pkgdocdir. This works fine.
Now how should I handle licenses? On EPEL6, %license is not defined,
neither is %_licensedir.
One possibility is to use
%{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc}
but that would violate the (fresh) packaging guideline mandating usage
of either %_pkgdocdir or %doc, but not both in the same specfile.
Any other suggestions?
I have a similar issue in libpng10:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/libpng10.git/tree/libpng10.spec
Basically, I copy the license file into %_pkgdocdir like for any other
documentation on systems where %_licensedir isn't defined.
Paul.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: Self Introduction: Török Edwin
Nice to meet you. -- Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng http://cicku.me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
Richard Hughes wrote: rantPerhaps, when we stop writing low level tools with specific latency requirements in interpreted languages... +1 In fact, IMHO, we should stop writing ANYTHING in interpreted languages. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: efl review swap?
Tom Callaway wrote: I sure could use a review on efl so that we can update Enlightenment to 0.19. Good luck! http://what.thedailywtf.com/t/enlightened/8795 (No, I haven't written the forum post linked above.) Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[EPEL-devel] Fwd: [Fedora-packaging] %license for EPEL6
This was on the packaging list but effects EPEL. Any suggestions?
-- Forwarded message --
From: Thomas Moschny thomas.mosc...@gmail.com
Date: 17 March 2015 at 10:59
Subject: [Fedora-packaging] %license for EPEL6
To: Fedora Packaging list packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
I have a package that can be build on all Fedora branches and on EPEL
6 and 7 with the same spec file. It uses
%{!?_pkgdocdir: %global _pkgdocdir %{_docdir}/%{name}-%{version}}
and copies all docs to this %_pkgdocdir. This works fine.
Now how should I handle licenses? On EPEL6, %license is not defined,
neither is %_licensedir.
One possibility is to use
%{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc}
but that would violate the (fresh) packaging guideline mandating usage
of either %_pkgdocdir or %doc, but not both in the same specfile.
Any other suggestions?
- Thomas
--
packaging mailing list
packag...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
___
epel-devel mailing list
epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel
Re: OpenSSL MD5 verification disabled?
doesn't honestly matter md5 and soon sha1 are insecure /phased out
inform the patch creator or submit a patch with it if you must use a
insecure hash like md5
Corey W Sheldon
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
(p) 310.909.7672
G+: https://www.plus.google.com/+CoreySheldon
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile/view?id=70127804
Github: https://www.github.com/linux-modder
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/corey.sheldon
Several Communities on Stack Exchange https://www.stackexchange.com
http://www.facebook.com/1stclassmobileshine
Tutoring in person or via any of the following platforms:
HackHands https://www.hackhands.com
Wizpert https://www.wizperts.com
FieldNation https://www.fieldnation.com
AirPair https://www.airpair.com
TrueLancer
{PayPal,Google Wallet/Play store, Apple Pay}
-BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
Version: GnuPG v1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=v6Cq
-END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 12:31 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org
wrote:
Hi, I don't have any comment on the issue for your particular software
package, since I don't know how important the security of the TLS is for
that package and I'm not familiar with your compatibility needs.
However, I see the following lines in the patch:
// Work around ill-considered decision by Fedora to stop allowing
// certificates with MD5 signatures
It's not an ill-considered decision. Researchers first created a
certificate collision -- a fake cert that's valid for the
/boot on Btrfs still not supported, main problem is anaconda and grubby
What's it going to take to fix this? Ubuntu supports it, openSUSE supports it, GRUB 2 has supported it for many years now. This is a 2.5 year old bug, with patches to fix the problem for ~9 months, which have been tested and work https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=864198 The short version of that bug (and the next one) is that on live installs, Anaconda copies the kernel with rsync, excluding the install media's initramfs, then calls grub2-mkconfig. The resulting grub.cfg lacks an initrd line for the primary entry, because there's no initramfs yet. This happens on all file systems. Next, the installer execute new-kernel-pkg, which creates the initramfs, and executes grubby which updates the grub.cfg to include the initrd line. Except on Btrfs. Every now and then the installer starts permitting /boot on Btrfs, which then causes blockers like this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200539 But due to the dependency on grubby, anaconda folks have fixed such blockers by disallowing /boot on Btrfs. This email basically constitutes the harassment approach to getting a really old bug fixed. But it's like, everything that should be done has been done, and yet we're stuck in the mud on this while other distros have totally bypassed this because they don't depend on grubby, and instead use upstream tools for generating grub.cfg. Now what? -- Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2015-03-18 at 18UTC)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 = Followups = None = New business = #topic #1419 provenpackager request (FAS - nonamedotc) https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1419 .fesco 1419 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. pgpmGlA4DrSg1.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: efl review swap?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 3:32 PM, Tom Callaway tcall...@redhat.com wrote: I sure could use a review on efl so that we can update Enlightenment to 0.19. Will swap for a review, or other Fedora related bribery. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1175952 I haven't look at it yet so I'm hoping I'm not signing up for anything crazy :) But here mine I need which is stalled by the original reviewer: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML] Update to 0.014
commit ba4c49fcd72a38b571fe0de985d53f19bc78ddbe
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Tue Mar 17 11:14:43 2015 +
Update to 0.014
- New upstream release 0.014
- Generated from ETHER/YAML-Tiny-1.66.tar.gz
- Use %license
perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec | 24 ++--
sources | 2 +-
2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec b/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec
index 541479c..068348c 100644
--- a/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec
+++ b/perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML
-Version: 0.012
-Release: 313%{?dist}
+Version: 0.014
+Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Read and write a subset of YAML for CPAN Meta files
License: GPL+ or Artistic
Group: Development/Libraries
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Meta-YAML/
Source0:
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DA/DAGOLDEN/CPAN-Meta-YAML-%{version}.tar.gz
BuildArch: noarch
# Build:
+BuildRequires: perl
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker) = 6.17
# Module Runtime:
BuildRequires: perl(B)
@@ -20,19 +21,17 @@ BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
# Tests:
# CPAN::Meta requires CPAN::Meta::YAML
%if 0%{!?perl_bootstrap:1}
-BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta)
-BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Requirements) = 2.120900
+BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta) = 2.120900
+BuildRequires: perl(CPAN::Meta::Prereqs)
%endif
BuildRequires: perl(File::Basename)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Find)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec::Functions)
-BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp)
-BuildRequires: perl(Getopt::Long)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Temp) = 0.19
BuildRequires: perl(IO::Dir)
BuildRequires: perl(JSON::PP)
BuildRequires: perl(lib)
-BuildRequires: perl(List::Util)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More) = 0.99
BuildRequires: perl(utf8)
BuildRequires: perl(vars)
@@ -49,7 +48,6 @@ BuildRequires:perl(Test::Version)
Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval `perl -V:version`; echo $version))
Requires: perl(Carp)
Requires: perl(Fcntl)
-Requires: perl(Scalar::Util)
%description
This module implements a subset of the YAML specification for use in reading
@@ -75,11 +73,17 @@ make test TEST_FILES=xt/*/*.t
%endif
%files
-%doc Changes LICENSE README
+%license LICENSE
+%doc Changes README
%{perl_vendorlib}/CPAN/
-%{_mandir}/man3/CPAN::Meta::YAML.3pm*
+%{_mandir}/man3/CPAN::Meta::YAML.3*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 17 2015 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.014-1
+- Update to 0.014
+ - Generated from ETHER/YAML-Tiny-1.66.tar.gz
+- Use %%license
+
* Fri Jan 09 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.012-313
- Require undetected dependencies explicitly
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index d7070aa..990cefd 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-bdee91cb71ddc7ed1a30abea611be9bb CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.012.tar.gz
+8852791ae976ddd0b7f93e7392287e9a CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.014.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.014.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by pghmcfc
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML: 8852791ae976ddd0b7f93e7392287e9a CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.014.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
On 16. 3. 2015 at 15:52:10, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisabledRepoSupport Change owner(s): Richard Hughes rhughes at redhat dot com The Software tool and PackageKit now support disabled repositories to help users locate software in additional repositories which are not meant to be enabled by default. * This Change is announced after the Change Submission Deadline as an exception to the process. May not be approved for proposed Fedora release. * == Detailed Description == This feature aims to reduce the technical hurdles for users and developers to locate software packaged for a distribution, but which needs to be clearly identified as not officially included (or possibly sanctioned) by that distribution. When Software (via PackageKit) queries a repo definition that contains the line enabled_metadata=1, even if the repo is disabled, it will download repodata. This feature allows a user to locate software in response to a search. If the user wants to install the software, she receives a dialog with information that the repo must be enabled to satisfy the request, and if relevant, information about the nature of the software (for instance, if it is non- libre). N.B. This feature does not currently operate in Fedora, since no such repo definitions are currently shipped. However, the feature could be used by remixers, and in the future in Fedora in the event of a policy change. == Scope == * Proposal owners: Include enhancements in gnome-software/PackageKit (done) * Other developers: N/A (not a System Wide Change) * Release engineering: N/A (not a System Wide Change) ** Note: For this feature to be used in Fedora requires an additional *- release-extra package to ship disabled repo definition * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not a System Wide Change) ** Note: For this feature to be used in Fedora requires clearer approval from FESCo and the Council I wonder, are there any implications for dnf in terms of being consistent with the new behavior of Gnome Software? I realize that people using dnf have more options than people using Gnome Software (--enablerepo for instance) but this sounds like the beginning of the end of disabled repositories. Personally, I don't like the semantics of these semi-disabled repos. It beats the purpose of disabling the repos in the first place, doesn't it? I mean I don't get why user would specify enabled_metadata=1 when he can achieve almost the same result with disabled=0 (the only difference I can see is one additional popup dialog). Or is there something I'm missing? Thanks Jan -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[Bug 1202793] New: perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 Bug ID: 1202793 Summary: perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Module-Path Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, psab...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.19 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.18-1.fc22 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-Path/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=6OdJFODi8za=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1202793] perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- Scratch build succeeded http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9251651 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QVfmMC0FvPa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
F-22 Branched report: 20150317 changes
Compose started at Tue Mar 17 07:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for armhfp -- [Sprog] Sprog-0.14-27.fc20.noarch requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.18.0) [aeskulap] aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libofstd.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires liboflog.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libijg8.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libijg16.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libijg12.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libdcmnet.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libdcmjpeg.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libdcmimgle.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libdcmimage.so.3.6 aeskulap-0.2.2-0.19beta1.fc22.armv7hl requires libdcmdata.so.3.6 [avro] avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc22.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce avro-mapred-1.7.5-9.fc22.noarch requires hadoop-client [bro] broccoli-2.3-1.fc22.armv7hl requires bro-2.3 python-broccoli-2.3-1.fc22.armv7hl requires bro-2.3 [cvc4] cvc4-1.3-7.fc22.armv7hl requires libboost_thread.so.1.55.0 cvc4-1.3-7.fc22.armv7hl requires libboost_system.so.1.55.0 [dnssec-check] dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.armv7hl requires libval-threads.so.14 dnssec-check-1.14.0.1-4.fc20.armv7hl requires libsres.so.14 [dock] dock-1.1.0-1.fc22.noarch requires python-docker-py [gcc-python-plugin] gcc-python2-debug-plugin-0.13-2.fc22.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.9.2-1.fc22 gcc-python2-plugin-0.13-2.fc22.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.9.2-1.fc22 gcc-python3-debug-plugin-0.13-2.fc22.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.9.2-1.fc22 gcc-python3-plugin-0.13-2.fc22.armv7hl requires gcc = 0:4.9.2-1.fc22 [gtranslator] gtranslator-2.91.6-7.fc22.armv7hl requires libgdict-1.0.so.6 [kdetoys] 7:kdetoys-4.14.3-1.fc22.noarch requires ktux = 0:4.14.3 [leksah] ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(utf8-string-0.3.7-013ef9ad8ac70ebb11df31f487b74f26) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(unix-2.6.0.1-7550b9ae9dbc74e4d6570cc239a29030) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(transformers-0.3.0.0-23508e0b4a1c1bc1cf2c2de3bb13e90c) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(time-1.4.0.1-970760bdd865d8b6cafac382276795a2) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(text-0.11.3.1-17cae9ba49c3f3d533bf78a6e387f543) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(strict-0.3.2-04f0cc1e99eff2196c0a7cd16d748b37) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(regex-tdfa-1.1.8-0b03687c4e38c00ef92e9445170081e2) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(regex-base-0.93.2-6a541a53412d1d7d310fa69bca50c85f) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(pretty-1.1.1.0-2de27f83b2c1c65d629a564e9e01b27d) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(parsec-3.1.3-a8bebef411959de671abb0f1f7da556f) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(old-time-1.1.0.1-29c02e2b3bbdfd9a5756f0c46f4d6071) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(network-2.4.1.2-82f6bcf79fe0252b3ab387e8dcb82e71) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(mtl-2.1.2-2f2cd438035824ec2bed4811930bc232) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(ltk-0.12.1.0-2fbb10498719be9dbdbb3d9f8adedbec) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(leksah-server-0.12.1.2-7dbd70c9f5e4dd8b3b5efcb6597b3bfd) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(hslogger-1.2.1-43834164508859009a3cc8aef7fd1e84) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(gtksourceview2-0.12.5.0-588b179d0562576f9afa46559cebf79f) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(gtk-0.12.5.0-2342a114ec8897cecfdda15ac92aed08) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(glib-0.12.5.0-1b94df160e141377711a221615168695) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(gio-0.12.5.0-b012293268f349d8f05c73d053798c7b) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(ghc-7.6.3-18fc786f8ad3478b9bb568d865b0e48d) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(filepath-1.3.0.1-62570c67b40fb99e7078c0d179220531) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(enumerator-0.4.19-a164f71ed1088e349dd8bc4cdee8e449) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires ghc-devel(directory-1.2.0.1-504c99535d64699e20e001d81b577d06) ghc-leksah-devel-0.12.1.3-16.fc22.armv7hl requires
[perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML/f22] Update to 0.014
Summary of changes: ba4c49f... Update to 0.014 (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML] Created tag perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.014-1.fc23
The lightweight tag 'perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.014-1.fc23' was created pointing to: ba4c49f... Update to 0.014 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML] Created tag perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.014-1.fc22
The lightweight tag 'perl-CPAN-Meta-YAML-0.014-1.fc22' was created pointing to: ba4c49f... Update to 0.014 -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1202793] perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org --- ppisar's perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=621069 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=gzV0kvld53a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Path/f20] 0.19 bump
commit 9b1cacf7f62b1eacc36848322a6d7e1901343137
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Mar 17 15:01:23 2015 +0100
0.19 bump
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Module-Path.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e4cfeca..0b8d6c0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
/Module-Path-0.14.tar.gz
/Module-Path-0.15.tar.gz
/Module-Path-0.18.tar.gz
+/Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Module-Path.spec b/perl-Module-Path.spec
index e3d244f..ed9e419 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Path.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Path.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Module-Path
-Version:0.18
+Version:0.19
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Get the full path to a locally installed module
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ any symbolic links.
%prep
%setup -q -n Module-Path-%{version}
-sed -i -e '1s|^#!.*|#!%{__perl}|' bin/mpath
+sed -i -e '1s|^#!.*|#!perl|' bin/mpath
%build
perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor
@@ -47,13 +47,16 @@ find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -exec rm -f {} +
make test
%files
-%doc Changes README LICENSE
+%doc Changes README LICENSE TODO.md
%{_bindir}/*
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 17 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.19-1
+- 0.19 bump
+
* Thu Dec 18 2014 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.18-1
- 0.18 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 2ed7a37..c949b12 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a3d24d0698e8e00604cc112b70821814 Module-Path-0.18.tar.gz
+8f409cc8654c5b3896f5d2770e07ddab Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1202793] perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- This is a bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=EC7quuKOala=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
File Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz uploaded to lookaside cache by ppisar
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Module-Path: 8f409cc8654c5b3896f5d2770e07ddab Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Path/f22] 0.19 bump
Summary of changes: c940ec1... 0.19 bump (*) (*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Path] 0.19 bump
commit c940ec1e9a10d3de8a4d4516fcd5dc3deb5e84d5
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Mar 17 15:01:23 2015 +0100
0.19 bump
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Module-Path.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e4cfeca..0b8d6c0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
/Module-Path-0.14.tar.gz
/Module-Path-0.15.tar.gz
/Module-Path-0.18.tar.gz
+/Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Module-Path.spec b/perl-Module-Path.spec
index b1f5a36..e4bd48f 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Path.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Path.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Module-Path
-Version:0.18
+Version:0.19
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Get the full path to a locally installed module
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ any symbolic links.
%prep
%setup -q -n Module-Path-%{version}
-sed -i -e '1s|^#!.*|#!%{__perl}|' bin/mpath
+sed -i -e '1s|^#!.*|#!perl|' bin/mpath
%build
perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
@@ -47,13 +47,16 @@ make test
%files
%license LICENSE
-%doc Changes README
+%doc Changes README TODO.md
%{_bindir}/*
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 17 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.19-1
+- 0.19 bump
+
* Thu Dec 18 2014 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.18-1
- 0.18 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 2ed7a37..c949b12 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a3d24d0698e8e00604cc112b70821814 Module-Path-0.18.tar.gz
+8f409cc8654c5b3896f5d2770e07ddab Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[perl-Module-Path/f21] 0.19 bump
commit ece4f5177d141af83438fe1e304b60da120642ba
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Tue Mar 17 15:01:23 2015 +0100
0.19 bump
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Module-Path.spec | 9 ++---
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e4cfeca..0b8d6c0 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
/Module-Path-0.14.tar.gz
/Module-Path-0.15.tar.gz
/Module-Path-0.18.tar.gz
+/Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Module-Path.spec b/perl-Module-Path.spec
index b1f5a36..e4bd48f 100644
--- a/perl-Module-Path.spec
+++ b/perl-Module-Path.spec
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Module-Path
-Version:0.18
+Version:0.19
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Get the full path to a locally installed module
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ any symbolic links.
%prep
%setup -q -n Module-Path-%{version}
-sed -i -e '1s|^#!.*|#!%{__perl}|' bin/mpath
+sed -i -e '1s|^#!.*|#!perl|' bin/mpath
%build
perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor NO_PACKLIST=1
@@ -47,13 +47,16 @@ make test
%files
%license LICENSE
-%doc Changes README
+%doc Changes README TODO.md
%{_bindir}/*
%{perl_vendorlib}/*
%{_mandir}/man1/*
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Tue Mar 17 2015 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com - 0.19-1
+- 0.19 bump
+
* Thu Dec 18 2014 Petr Šabata con...@redhat.com - 0.18-1
- 0.18 bump
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index 2ed7a37..c949b12 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-a3d24d0698e8e00604cc112b70821814 Module-Path-0.18.tar.gz
+8f409cc8654c5b3896f5d2770e07ddab Module-Path-0.19.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1202793] perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc2 ||3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=K7PzhwPey5a=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1202793] perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=GfmkVJG2OYa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1202793] perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=5tcM7vDtLOa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
[Bug 1202793] perl-Module-Path-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202793 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Module-Path-0.19-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=AM2eOr9dQLa=cc_unsubscribe -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Re: OpenSSL MD5 verification disabled?
Hi, I don't have any comment on the issue for your particular software package, since I don't know how important the security of the TLS is for that package and I'm not familiar with your compatibility needs. However, I see the following lines in the patch: // Work around ill-considered decision by Fedora to stop allowing // certificates with MD5 signatures It's not an ill-considered decision. Researchers first created a certificate collision -- a fake cert that's valid for the MD5 signature that a CA put on another cert -- in *2008*. You can't pretend these are secure in 2015. If you want to accept MD5 certificates, which might make sense depending on your compatibility needs, keep that in mind. It's certainly better than no TLS at all, but won't stop a good attacker. MD5 certificates were phased out years ago, and blocking them does not cause any compatibility issues for certificates from real CAs anymore. The logbook site should use SHA-256 instead of MD5. (Note that SHA-1 is being phased out too!) Michael -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: OpenSSL MD5 verification disabled?
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:24 AM, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: Hi, I don't have any comment on the issue for your particular software package, since I don't know how important the security of the TLS is for that package and I'm not familiar with your compatibility needs. However, I see the following lines in the patch: // Work around ill-considered decision by Fedora to stop allowing // certificates with MD5 signatures It's not an ill-considered decision. Researchers first created a certificate collision -- a fake cert that's valid for the MD5 signature that a CA put on another cert -- in *2008*. You can't pretend these are secure in 2015. If you want to accept MD5 certificates, which might make sense depending on your compatibility needs, keep that in mind. It's certainly better than no TLS at all, but won't stop a good attacker. Just to be clear, it's not my patch :) Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: F22 Self Contained Change: Disabled Repositories Support
On 17 March 2015 at 15:35, Miloslav Trmač m...@redhat.com wrote: Wait, the metadata download and search code is not shared? What would it take to make it so? No. The dnf code is in python and the libhif code is in C. /me wonders how many unicorns and kittens will have to die before we get rid of all this dupli^Wtriplication. rantPerhaps, when we stop writing low level tools with specific latency requirements in interpreted languages... Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
[PkgDB] psabata:perl-YAML-Tiny commit set to Approved
user: psabata set for pghmcfc acl: commit of package: perl-YAML-Tiny from: Awaiting Review to: Approved on branch: master To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/perl-YAML-Tiny -- Fedora Extras Perl SIG http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl perl-devel mailing list perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
OpenSSL MD5 verification disabled?
I've got a new BZ report for my package TrustedQSL which uses OpenSSL to very a certificate used for uploading ham radio contacts to an online logbook. The system uses MD5 which appears to be disabled in F21+. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202157 I don't like the workaround specified in the BZ but I don't see an alternative so I would like to get some input from others who are better versed in how OpenSSL works. Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: OpenSSL MD5 verification disabled?
On 17.3.2015 17:00, Richard Shaw wrote: I've got a new BZ report for my package TrustedQSL which uses OpenSSL to very a certificate used for uploading ham radio contacts to an online logbook. The system uses MD5 which appears to be disabled in F21+. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202157 I don't like the workaround specified in the BZ but I don't see an alternative so I would like to get some input from others who are better versed in how OpenSSL works. Hi, there is no other workaround. And they should not use MD5 signed certificates - they are insecure. Regards, Tomas Mraz -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
