Re: Gone upstream of nodm, so orphaning?
nodm is now orphaned with all branches. Please feel free to take this package and/or poke upstream about valid sources. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Running CLI uitilities not available in Fedora?
Hello All! I'd like to ask you for advice. I've packaged an application which can use external CLI tools (not available in Fedora for various non-legal reasons). Shall I remove support for these tools or better keep it? -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Running CLI uitilities not available in Fedora?
On 03/02/2016 06:50 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: Hello All! I'd like to ask you for advice. I've packaged an application which can use external CLI tools (not available in Fedora for various non-legal reasons). Shall I remove support for these tools or better keep it? The answer is "it depends". I don't think removing support/features from tools you package is the way forward: it makes maintenance harder for you, and if users install the non-available CLI then try to use your packaged program, they would be surprised to find it can't use that external CLI tool. Definitely make sure that your packaged app has a useful error when users try to use features that require the external CLI, and maybe even tells them where to find it if they're willing to install from external sources. -Ryan -- Ryan Brown / Red Hat, Inc. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
perl-Text-SimpleTable license correction
FYI, perl-Text-SimpleTable's license was corrected from `the same as Perl' to `Artistic 2.0'. P signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[HEADS UP]: OpenSSH 7.2 to Fedora 23
Hi there, I just pushed openssh-7.2 update [1] into Fedora 23 testing. There are no incompatible changes except these: * the minimum modulus size supported for diffie-hellman-group-exchange was increased to 2048 bits, * several legacy cryptographic algorithms and MD5-based and truncated HMAC algorithms were disabled on client side. which might be some trouble when connecting to old systems. If you need to use some of these fancy ciphers or HMACs, you need to configure your client to use them explicitly, for example: ssh -o Ciphers=+blowfish-cbc -o MACs=+hmac-md5-96 your_host or store appropriate values to the ~/.ssh/config. SSH should now also yield reasonable messages when it was not able to negotiate particular algorithms. My tests passed and the package is already for few days in rawhide and f24, but another testing would be appreciated, especially quick check if some of your common use cases are not disturbed. And there are also some fancy features you might want to give a try such ad-hoc adding keys to ssh-agent or new keyword restrict to use in authorized_keys file [2]. Thanks for attention and have a great day, [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/openssh-7.2p1-1.fc23 [2] http://www.openssh.com/txt/release-7.2 -- Jakub Jelen Security Technologies Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Your Outstanding Requests and Closed bugs with Needinfo
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:05:18 -0300 Reartes Guillermo wrote: > Hi, > > The mail "[Red Hat Bugzilla] Your Outstanding Requests" is showing me > these items since some time ago. > > These seems to have the NEEDINFO flag, but they are CLOSED (and > several releases ago). > > Should the closure of the bugreport have cancelled or provided the > NEEDINFO? > > > I really want to get rid of this list. You should go able to go to each of these bugs and clear the needinfo. Just say "These are end of life, clearing needinfo" and check the box that says you are providing the info needed. kevin pgpzIOLaZkevs.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bodhi broken in creating buildoverrides
On Sat, 27 Feb 2016 21:13:23 +0100 josef radinger wrote: > i just stumbled over the following error while using bodhi on f22: ...snip... > there seem to be several tickets open for that, but no visible > progress. tickets in trac and bugzilla: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278742 I asked Luke about this one and he said it's a known issue that should hopefully be fixed soon. I'll ask him to update the bug. > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/790 This seems to be a different issue to me entirely... > the webpage is by no means a substitute for the cli. kevin pgp6VbLJVQWVT.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Strange VM/HW dichotomy building Ruby packages
On Mon, 29 Feb 2016 14:49:10 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: > If you observe the build logs carefully, there were some segfaults for > example: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13171578 > > This particular one is PPC, so it might be platform specific issue, > who knows Yeah, all the failures were on ppc64le... I guess I'd say file a bug on the rhel7 ruby and see if the folks there can duplicate. In the mean time you should be able to (as you have seen) just rebuild until it hits a non ppc64le builder. kevin pgp9Z470395Bo.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2016-03-03 17:00 UTC)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2016-03-03 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2016-03-03 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PST
2016-03-03 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EST
2016-03-03 17:00 Thu UTC <-
2016-03-03 17:00 Thu Europe/London <-
2016-03-03 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris CET
2016-03-03 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin CET
2016-03-03 22:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta IST
--new day--
2016-03-04 01:00 Fri Asia/Singapore SGT
2016-03-04 01:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong HKT
2016-03-04 02:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo JST
2016-03-04 03:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane EST
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13
= Followups =
#topic #558 Application/Library distinction and package splitting
.fpc 558
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/558
#topic #566 RPM file triggers
.fpc 566
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/566
#topic #598 introduce pyp2rpm tool on Packaging:Python page
.fpc 598
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/598
= New business =
#topic #600 %systemd_requires macro
.fpc 600
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/600
#topic #601 Standard macro for RPM macro directory
.fpc 601
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/601
#topic #602 Mono packages must have ExclusiveArch: %{mono_arches}
.fpc 602
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/602
#topic #605 Bootstrapping exception for GPRbuild
.fpc 605
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/605
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
eseyman pushed to perl-Moo (master). "Update to 2.001000"
From b12dfde16611e3d73016457a0adc06302864f7ca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Emmanuel Seyman
Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:49:38 +0100
Subject: Update to 2.001000
---
.gitignore| 1 +
perl-Moo.spec | 7 +--
sources | 2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index 3096e5c..8e65138 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -23,3 +23,4 @@
/Moo-2.00.tar.gz
/Moo-2.01.tar.gz
/Moo-2.02.tar.gz
+/Moo-2.001000.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Moo.spec b/perl-Moo.spec
index f7501a2..66337b7 100644
--- a/perl-Moo.spec
+++ b/perl-Moo.spec
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
Name: perl-Moo
-Version:2.02
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Version:2.001000
+Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Minimalist Object Orientation (with Moose compatibility)
License:GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -93,6 +93,9 @@ make test
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Wed Mar 02 2016 Emmanuel Seyman - 2.001000-1
+- Update to 2.001000
+
* Thu Feb 04 2016 Fedora Release Engineering -
2.02-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_24_Mass_Rebuild
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e097da1..c0fcc4c 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -1 +1 @@
-8b84a7289fc6247de5ec5d151105fd6b Moo-2.02.tar.gz
+25d1b88c9246ac323a267bf0d32fbfdb Moo-2.001000.tar.gz
--
cgit v0.12
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Moo.git/commit/?h=master&id=b12dfde16611e3d73016457a0adc06302864f7ca
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Gone upstream of nodm, so orphaning?
Why not retire it directly and properly? Just an idea ;-) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
