Re: Can't request commit access after requesting an EPEL 7 branch
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 03:23:36PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: >On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:59:08 -0700 > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pg_top/ > > I requested that an EPEL 7 branch be created for pg_top and it was > > granted, but now I can't request commit access for the other branches. > > Is this a known issue? > > Is there a workaround? > > Thanks, > > Dave > > Looks like you have them now? I don't know of anything that would cause > them not to show up for you. ;( > >The other admin went in and manually added access for me but there was no >way for me to request it. I should have been more clear that this email >wasn't to resolve this specific issue but the general issue of there being >no way to request commit access on other branches when you're the admin of >at least one branch. I guess the approach then is to use the 'Manage' buttons (Manage the admins, Manage the committers) to set your status to 'Awaiting Review', but indeed the button to request the acl on all branches disappear once you have the acl on one of the branch. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Can't request commit access after requesting an EPEL 7 branch
On Sat, 9 Apr 2016 15:23:36 -0700 Dave Johansen wrote: > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Apr 2016 12:59:08 -0700 > > Dave Johansen wrote: > > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pg_top/ > > > I requested that an EPEL 7 branch be created for pg_top and it was > > > granted, but now I can't request commit access for the other > > > branches. Is this a known issue? > > > Is there a workaround? > > > Thanks, > > > Dave > > > > Looks like you have them now? I don't know of anything that would > > cause them not to show up for you. ;( > > > The other admin went in and manually added access for me but there > was no way for me to request it. I should have been more clear that > this email wasn't to resolve this specific issue but the general > issue of there being no way to request commit access on other > branches when you're the admin of at least one branch. Strange, could you file a ticket on this? https://github.com/fedora-infra/pkgdb2/issues kevin pgp3Ay83ADMFN.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 24-20160410.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Images in this compose but not 24-20160409.n.0: Lxde live i386 Lxde live x86_64 Images in 24-20160409.n.0 but not this: Soas live x86_64 Soas live i386 Failed openQA tests: 4/63 (x86_64), 16/17 (i386) ID: 12732 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12732 ID: 12730 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12730 ID: 12729 Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12729 ID: 12728 Test: i386 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12728 ID: 12727 Test: i386 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12727 ID: 12726 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12726 ID: 12725 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12725 ID: 12724 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12724 ID: 12723 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12723 ID: 12722 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12722 ID: 12713 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12713 ID: 12707 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12707 ID: 12687 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12687 ID: 12679 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12679 ID: 12678 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12678 ID: 12672 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12672 ID: 12671 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12671 ID: 12661 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12661 ID: 12660 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12660 ID: 12653 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12653 Passed openQA tests: 59/63 (x86_64), 1/17 (i386) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20160410.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Kde live i386 Workstation live i386 Kde live x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Kde raw-xz armhfp Workstation live x86_64 Images in this compose but not Rawhide-20160409.n.0: Mate raw-xz armhfp No images in Rawhide-20160409.n.0 but not this. Failed openQA tests: 6/53 (x86_64), 15/15 (i386) ID: 12652 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12652 ID: 12651 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12651 ID: 12650 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12650 ID: 12649 Test: i386 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12649 ID: 12648 Test: i386 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12648 ID: 12647 Test: i386 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12647 ID: 12646 Test: i386 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12646 ID: 12645 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12645 ID: 12644 Test: i386 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12644 ID: 12643 Test: i386 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12643 ID: 12642 Test: i386 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12642 ID: 12638 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12638 ID: 12630 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12630 ID: 12624 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12624 ID: 12617 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12617 ID: 12616 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12616 ID: 12615 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12615 ID: 12592 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12592 ID: 12589 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12589 ID: 12588 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12588 ID: 12585 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/12585 Passed openQA tests: 47/53 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Name of some Ruby "application" packages
Hi, I am studying Ruby packaging guidelines. I would need to know some packages names that have been built following the "Applications" [1] rules, in order to read their spec file and upstream sources tree. Thank you for your time [1]: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby?rd=Packaging/Ruby#Applications signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20160410.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20160409.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20160410.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 109 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.22 MiB Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 863.91 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 3.27 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: arquillian-core-1.1.11-3.fc25 Summary: Arquillian Core Aggregator RPMs:arquillian-bom arquillian-build arquillian-config-api arquillian-config-impl-base arquillian-config-parent arquillian-config-spi arquillian-container-impl-base arquillian-container-parent arquillian-container-spi arquillian-container-test-api arquillian-container-test-impl-base arquillian-container-test-spi arquillian-core-api arquillian-core-impl-base arquillian-core-javadoc arquillian-core-parent arquillian-core-spi arquillian-junit-container arquillian-junit-core arquillian-junit-parent arquillian-junit-standalone arquillian-parent arquillian-protocol-jmx arquillian-protocol-parent arquillian-protocol-servlet arquillian-test-api arquillian-test-impl-base arquillian-test-parent arquillian-test-spi arquillian-testenricher-cdi arquillian-testenricher-ejb arquillian-testenricher-initialcontext arquillian-testenricher-parent arquillian-testenricher-resource arquillian-testng-container arquillian-testng-core arquillian-testng-parent arquillian-testng-standalone Size:1550532 bytes Package: shrinkwrap-resolver-2.2.2-1.fc25 Summary: ShrinkWrap Resolver Maven Plugin RPMs:shrinkwrap-resolver-api shrinkwrap-resolver-api-gradle-embedded-archive shrinkwrap-resolver-api-maven shrinkwrap-resolver-api-maven-archive shrinkwrap-resolver-bom shrinkwrap-resolver-build-resources shrinkwrap-resolver-depchain shrinkwrap-resolver-gradle-depchain shrinkwrap-resolver-impl-gradle-embedded-archive shrinkwrap-resolver-impl-maven shrinkwrap-resolver-impl-maven-archive shrinkwrap-resolver-javadoc shrinkwrap-resolver-maven-plugin shrinkwrap-resolver-parent shrinkwrap-resolver-spi shrinkwrap-resolver-spi-maven shrinkwrap-resolver-spi-maven-archive Size:774326 bytes = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: 0ad-0.0.20-2.fc25 Old package: 0ad-0.0.20-1.fc25 Summary: Cross-Platform RTS Game of Ancient Warfare RPMs: 0ad Size: 10848794 bytes Size change: -32092 bytes Changelog: * Sat Apr 09 2016 Peter Robinson 0.0.20-2 - Upstream now supports aarch64 (tests currently fail) Package: atril-1.14.0-1.fc25 Old package: atril-1.13.1-1.fc24 Summary: Document viewer RPMs: atril atril-caja atril-devel atril-libs atril-thumbnailer Size: 4649894 bytes Size change: -31076 bytes Changelog: * Tue Apr 05 2016 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.14.0-1 - update to 1.14.0 release Package: bluedevil-5.6.2-1.fc25 Old package: bluedevil-5.6.1-1.fc25 Summary: Bluetooth stack for KDE RPMs: bluedevil Size: 1224562 bytes Size change: -96 bytes Changelog: * Sat Apr 09 2016 Rex Dieter - 5.6.2-1 - 5.6.2 Package: breeze-gtk-5.6.2-1.fc25 Old package: breeze-gtk-5.6.1-1.fc25 Summary: Breeze widget theme for Gtk2 and Gtk3 RPMs: breeze-gtk Size: 1341766 bytes Size change: 148 bytes Changelog: * Sat Apr 09 2016 Rex Dieter - 5.6.2-1 - 5.6.2 Package: caja-1.14.0-1.fc25 Old package: caja-1.13.1-1.fc24 Summary: File manager for MATE RPMs: caja caja-devel caja-extensions caja-schemas Size: 11203752 bytes Size change: -32936 bytes Changelog: * Tue Apr 05 2016 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.14.0-1 - update to 1.14.0 release Package: caja-extensions-1.14.0-1.fc25 Old package: caja-extensions-1.13.0-1.fc24 Summary: MATE file manager sendto RPMs: caja-beesu caja-extensions-common caja-image-converter caja-open-terminal caja-sendto caja-sendto-devel caja-share caja-wallpaper Size: 649360 bytes Size change: -4260 bytes Changelog: * Tue Apr 05 2016 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1.14.0-1 - update to 1.14.0 release Package: dh-autoreconf-12-1.fc25 Old package: dh-autoreconf-11-1.fc24 Summary: debhelper add-on to call autoreconf and clean up after the build RPMs: dh-autoreconf Size: 22670 bytes Size change: -1012 bytes Changelog: * Sun Apr 10 2016 Sandro Mani - 12-1 - Update to 12 Package: emerald-1:0.8.12.4-1.fc25 Old package: emerald-1:0.8.12.2-1.fc25 Summary: Themeable window decorator and compositing manager for Compiz RPMs: emerald emerald-devel Size: 1023596 bytes Size change: 4292 bytes Changelog: * Sat Apr 09 2016 Wolfgang Ulbrich - 1:0.8.12.4-1 - update to 0.8.12.4 release - build with gtk+3 Package: engrampa-1.14.0-1.fc25 Old package: engrampa-1.13.1-1.fc24 Summary: MATE Desktop file archiver RPMs: engrampa Size: 3756374
Re: Error while retiring breathe
On Sat, Apr 09, 2016 at 04:11:29PM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote: > It has been renamed to python-breathe and should be retied from all > branches. Based on that I assumed I was doig the right thing based on the > statement: "Run fedpkg retire DESCRIPTION in all branches that need to be > retired starting with the oldest branch". It cannot be retired in stable Fedora branches, since the packages cannot be removed from the mirrors or distributed DVDs. I retired it in f24 and master now. What about EPEL7, should it be retired there as well? > Could not retire package: ServerError( > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb//api/package/retire/, 200, Error > returned from json module while processing > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb//api/package/retire/: Expecting > value: line 2 column 1 (char 1) I guess this is the error that Kevin mentioned. I do not know more about this. Kind regards Till -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning packages
- Original Message - > From: "Cosimo Cecchi" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Saturday, April 9, 2016 11:02:36 PM > Subject: Orphaning packages > > I just orphaned the following packages: > > - abattis-cantarell-fonts (devel, F24, F23, F22, EPEL6) > - anjuta (devel, F24, F23, F22) > - gnome-themes-standard (devel, F24, F23, F22) Taken (devel, f24) > - gnome-weather (devel, F24, F23, F22) Taken (devel, f24) > > See https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/5229 for context. > > Thanks, > Cosimo > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- -Igor Gnatenko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
