Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable
On 08/19/2016 09:54 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 09:45 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> However, pre-release Fedora is different from released Fedoras in that the >> updates-testing repo is enabled by default on them. This means that if you >> push >> the ca-certificates package to updates-testing before next week's Go/No-Go >> meeting, it is guaranteed that it will already be available to anyone doing a >> dnf update from the moment they install the Alpha media. This makes it >> exactly >> one update from inclusion on Alpha systems. It does not need to wait for a >> stable push to get there. > > Thank you for this detail. > > In other words: > - exclude this change from alpha to avoid all risks > - create the alpha release, and after it's done: > - build this change into f25 updates-testing > - all F25 alpha users doing updates will get this change > immediately and will participate in testing it. > FESCo discussed this briefly on Friday. There was no formal vote, but the general sense was that you should just go ahead and do this as described above (immediately, so it lands in updates-testing ASAP and will be available by the time the Alpha ships). signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
broken dependencies due to libgexiv2 python subpackages rename
Hello, Kalev. It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2: * Mon Aug 15 2016 Kalev Lember - 0.10.4-1 [...] - Rename python2 and python3 subpackages are per latest guidelines I started getting broken dep nag-mails on August 20th: === lazygal has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: lazygal-0.8.8-1.fc26.noarch requires libgexiv2-python2 On i386: lazygal-0.8.8-1.fc26.noarch requires libgexiv2-python2 On armhfp: lazygal-0.8.8-1.fc26.noarch requires libgexiv2-python2 Please resolve this as soon as possible. === I didn't see any notification from you about this beforehand. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: broken dependencies due to libgexiv2 python subpackages rename
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Kalev.
> It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected
> packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2:
>
> * Mon Aug 15 2016 Kalev Lember - 0.10.4-1
> [...]
> - Rename python2 and python3 subpackages are per latest guidelines
>
> I started getting broken dep nag-mails on August 20th:
> ===
> lazygal has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
> On x86_64:
> lazygal-0.8.8-1.fc26.noarch requires libgexiv2-python2
Or implement the rename in a backward-compatible way, adding
Provides: libgexiv2-python2 = %{version}-%{release}
under the .spec snippet for the Obsoletes:
# For upgrade path from F24
Obsoletes: libgexiv2-python2 < 0.10.4
...
-- Rex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: broken dependencies due to libgexiv2 python subpackages rename
On 08/22/2016 01:56 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hello, Kalev. > It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected > packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2: Sorry, I didn't find anything using them when I checked. My bad. Thanks for fixing it up! -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20160822.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 29179 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29179 ID: 29180 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29180 ID: 29181 Test: i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29181 ID: 29182 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29182 ID: 29183 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29183 ID: 29189 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29189 ID: 29190 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29190 ID: 29191 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29191 ID: 29192 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29192 ID: 29193 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29193 ID: 29194 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29194 ID: 29195 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29195 ID: 29201 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29201 ID: 29204 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29204 ID: 29205 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29205 ID: 29206 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29206 ID: 29207 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29207 ID: 29213 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29213 ID: 29214 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29214 ID: 29221 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29221 ID: 29222 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29222 ID: 29223 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29223 ID: 29225 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29225 ID: 29226 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29226 ID: 29227 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29227 ID: 29228 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29228 ID: 29229 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29229 ID: 29231 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29231 ID: 29232 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29232 ID: 29233 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29233 ID: 29236 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29236 ID: 29238 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29238 ID: 29239 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29239 ID: 29240 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29240 ID: 29241 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29241 ID: 29242 Test: x86_64 universal install_updates_img_local URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29242 ID: 29243 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29243 ID: 29244 Test: x86_64 universal install_shrink_ntfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29244 ID: 29245 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29245 ID: 29246 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29246 ID: 29250 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29250 ID: 29251 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29251 ID: 29252 Test: x86_64 universal
Re: broken dependencies due to libgexiv2 python subpackages rename
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Kalev Lember wrote: > > On 08/22/2016 01:56 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hello, Kalev. > > It would've been nice if you had contacted the maintainers of affected > > packages before renaming the python subpackages of libgexiv2: > > Sorry, I didn't find anything using them when I checked. My bad. Thanks > for fixing it up! A good strategy for changes like this is to not even try to find out if anything's using something. Fedora != the world, and we have a documented process for changes like this that not only stuff in Fedora, but things outside of Fedora that build on it should be able to rely on. Just add the Provides, and remove it later: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates
Change in package status over the last 168 hours 11 packages were orphaned - system-config-date [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp A graphical interface for modifying system date and time https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-date system-config-date-docs [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Documentation for setting the system date and time https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-date-docs system-config-network [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Network Administration Tool https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-network system-config-nfs [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp NFS server configuration tool https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-nfs system-config-nfs-docs [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Documentation for configuring an NFS server https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-nfs-docs system-config-samba [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Samba server configuration tool https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-samba system-config-samba-docs [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Documentation for configuring a Samba server https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-samba-docs system-config-services [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Utility to start and stop system services https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-services system-config-services-docs [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Documentation for configuring system services https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-services-docs system-config-users [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp A graphical interface for administering users and groups https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-users system-config-users-docs [master, f25] was orphaned by nphilipp Documentation for administering users and groups https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/system-config-users-docs 9 packages were retired aries-blueprint [master, f25] was retired by gil Apache Aries Blueprint https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/aries-blueprint aries-proxy [master, f25] was retired by gil Apache Aries Class Proxy https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/aries-proxy aries-quiesce [master, f25] was retired by gil Apache Aries Quiesce https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/aries-quiesce cmap-cns1-6 [master, f25] was retired by tc01 Adobe PDF character map data https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cmap-cns1-6 cmap-gb1-5 [master, f25] was retired by tc01 Adobe PDF character map data https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cmap-gb1-5 cmap-identity0 [master, f25] was retired by tc01 Adobe PDF character map data https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cmap-identity0 cmap-japan1-6 [master, f25] was retired by tc01 Adobe PDF character map data https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cmap-japan1-6 cmap-korean1-2 [master, f25] was retired by tc01 Adobe PDF character map data https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/cmap-korean1-2 ghc-yesod-routes [master] was retired by petersen Efficient routing for Yesod https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/ghc-yesod-routes 26 packages unorphaned -- bdii [master, f25] was unorphaned by till The Berkeley Database Information Index (BDII) https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/bdii dpm-dsi [master, f25] was unorphaned by till Disk Pool Manager (DPM) plugin for the Globus GridFTP server https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/dpm-dsi extremetuxracer [f23, master, f25, f24] was unorphaned by limb High speed arctic racing game https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/extremetuxracer globus-gatekeeper [master, f25] was unorphaned by till Globus Toolkit - Globus Gatekeeper https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/globus-gatekeeper globus-gridftp-server [master, f25] was unorphaned by till Globus Toolkit - Globus GridFTP Server https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/globus-gridftp-server globus-scheduler-event-generator [master, f25] was unorphaned by till Globus Toolkit - Scheduler Event Generator https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/globus-scheduler-event-generator gnustep-base [f23, master, f25, f24, el6, epel7] was unorphaned by sagitter GNUstep Base library package https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/gnustep-base gnustep-make [f23, master, f25, f24, el6, epel7] was unorphaned by sagitter GNUstep makefile package https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/gnustep-make gogoc [f23, master, f25, f24, el6, epel7] was unorphaned by
Re: GNOME 3.21.90 megaupdate
Hi, It seems that gnome-control-center is missing from the megaupdate ? Regards, Hans (replying from the web-archive so no quoted context, sorry) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: GNOME 3.21.90 megaupdate
On 08/22/2016 03:07 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > It seems that gnome-control-center is missing from the megaupdate ? Yes; this is because the control center stack is missing upstream releases for .90. -- Kalev -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
bash style guide on Fedora?
Hi, We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as /etc/init.d/functions /etc/profile Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline (coding standards) to write the shell script on Feodra? Thanks, Jun Aruga -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Testing request: AMD chipset kernel issue
On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Andrew Lutomirski wrote: > On Aug 20, 2016 4:50 PM, "Andrew Lutomirski" wrote: >> > >> >> How about ordinary earlyprintk to serial? >> >> Try booting with nokaslr, though. There was a bug, now fixed upstream (I >> think) that broke AMD early microcode if kaslr was used. You would likely >> trigger it only on systems for which an early update exists. > > The patch is > http://git.kernel.org/tip/88b2f634028f1f38dcc3d412e10ff1f224976daa > This patch is included in the 4.8-rc2.git3.1 builds from Friday which were filed in updates-testing. Thanks, Justin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash style guide on Fedora?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM Jun Aruga wrote: > Hi, > > We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as > /etc/init.d/functions > /etc/profile > > Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline (coding > standards) to write the shell script on Feodra? > > Thanks, > Jun Aruga > > I'm not familiar with one, but I'd recommend using shellcheck on them to detect potential issues. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash style guide on Fedora?
Hello, On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM Jun Aruga wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as >> /etc/init.d/functions >> /etc/profile >> >> Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline >> (coding standards) to write the shell script on Feodra? >> >> Thanks, >> Jun Aruga >> >> > I'm not familiar with one, but I'd recommend using shellcheck on them to > detect potential issues. > > You can also take a look at bashate [ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bashate ], an automated style checker for bash scripts to fill the same part of code review that pep8 does in most OpenStack projects. Thanks, Chandan Kumar -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash style guide on Fedora?
Hi, > I'm not familiar with one, but I'd recommend using shellcheck on them to > detect potential issues. Thanks. shellcheck? you mean "sh -n something.sh"? Yes, I will do it too :) I mean such as following pages, that I just searched on internet. https://google.github.io/styleguide/shell.xml https://github.com/icy/bash-coding-style http://wiki.bash-hackers.org/scripting/style Jun Aruga - Original Message - > From: "Christopher" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 4:25:16 PM > Subject: Re: bash style guide on Fedora? > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM Jun Aruga < jar...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > Hi, > > We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as > /etc/init.d/functions > /etc/profile > > Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline (coding > standards) to write the shell script on Feodra? > > Thanks, > Jun Aruga > > > I'm not familiar with one, but I'd recommend using shellcheck on them to > detect potential issues. > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash style guide on Fedora?
Hi, > You can also take a look at bashate [ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bashate ], > an automated style checker for bash scripts > to fill the same part of code review that pep8 does in most OpenStack > projects. > Thanks, Its tool looks helpful & useful for me. I would take a look at it. Thanks. Jun Aruga - Original Message - > From: "chandan kumar" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Sent: Monday, August 22, 2016 4:31:38 PM > Subject: Re: bash style guide on Fedora? > > Hello, > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Christopher < ctubb...@fedoraproject.org > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:01 AM Jun Aruga < jar...@redhat.com > wrote: > > > Hi, > > We can see several bash (= sh on Fedora) script files under /etc such as > /etc/init.d/functions > /etc/profile > > Anyone could you tell me whether there is a common style guideline (coding > standards) to write the shell script on Feodra? > > Thanks, > Jun Aruga > > > I'm not familiar with one, but I'd recommend using shellcheck on them to > detect potential issues. > > > You can also take a look at bashate [ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bashate ], > an automated style checker for bash scripts > to fill the same part of code review that pep8 does in most OpenStack > projects. > Thanks, > > Chandan Kumar > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 07:40 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > FESCo discussed this briefly on Friday. There was no formal vote, but the > general sense was that you should just go ahead and do this as described above > (immediately, so it lands in updates-testing ASAP and will be available by the > time the Alpha ships). Thanks! commited http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/ca-certificates.git/commit/?h=f25&id=9c4ba05bc7552c5d4163760cc997b6021ac5a606 built http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15337856 and update submitted https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/ca-certificates-2016.2.9-1.1.fc25 Kai -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 25-20160822.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Cloud_base raw-xz x86_64 Cloud_base raw-xz i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 11/89 (x86_64), 3/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 29290 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29290 ID: 29300 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29300 ID: 29301 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29301 ID: 29303 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29303 ID: 29304 Test: x86_64 Atomic-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29304 ID: 29305 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29305 ID: 29306 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29306 ID: 29312 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29312 ID: 29330 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29330 ID: 29350 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29350 ID: 29351 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29351 ID: 29352 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29352 ID: 29373 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29373 ID: 29396 Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29396 ID: 29401 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/29401 Passed openQA tests: 73/89 (x86_64), 14/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) Skipped openQA tests: 5 of 108 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/fedora-qa.git/tree/check-compose -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash style guide on Fedora?
Jun Aruga wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:36:48AM -0400: > shellcheck? you mean "sh -n something.sh"? Yes, I will do it too :) He does mean shellcheck[1]. It's nice; doesn't do style check (e.g. trailing spaces or whatsnot) but catches quite a lot of errors. [1] https://www.shellcheck.net/ -- Dominique Martinet -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash style guide on Fedora?
On 08/22/2016 09:31 AM, chandan kumar wrote: > You can also take a look at bashate [ https://pypi.python.org/pypi/bashate ], > an automated style checker for bash scripts > to fill the same part of code review that pep8 does in most OpenStack > projects. I'll second the usage of 'bashate'. It's really useful for keeping bash scripts a little more consistent. -- Major Hayden -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160822.n.0 compose check report
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) It looks like there was a font rendering change in Rawhide somewhere between 20160812 and 20160820, which makes most of the tests fail. I'll find a couple of hours to update all the needles today if I can. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: bash style guide on Fedora?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 11:17 AM Dominique Martinet < dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote: > Jun Aruga wrote on Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 10:36:48AM -0400: > > shellcheck? you mean "sh -n something.sh"? Yes, I will do it too :) > > He does mean shellcheck[1]. > > It's nice; doesn't do style check (e.g. trailing spaces or whatsnot) > but catches quite a lot of errors. > > > [1] https://www.shellcheck.net/ > Yes, this is the shellcheck[1] I meant, but it's also just packaged for Fedora: $ sudo dnf install ShellCheck $ shellcheck myscript.sh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
review swap
hi I'm looking for reviewers for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369224 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369232 Is anybody interested in a swap? Thanks in advance regards .g -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160822.n.0 compose check report
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> Missing expected images: >> >> Cloud_base raw-xz i386 >> Atomic raw-xz x86_64 >> >> Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) > > It looks like there was a font rendering change in Rawhide somewhere > between 20160812 and 20160820, which makes most of the tests fail. I'll > find a couple of hours to update all the needles today if I can. Are you sure the font rendering change is intentional? -- Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160822.n.0 compose check report
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 14:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > > > > > Missing expected images: > > > > > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > > > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > > > > > Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) > > > > It looks like there was a font rendering change in Rawhide somewhere > > between 20160812 and 20160820, which makes most of the tests fail. I'll > > find a couple of hours to update all the needles today if I can. > > Are you sure the font rendering change is intentional? They usually are. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160822.n.0 compose check report
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 14:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson >> wrote: >> > >> > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: >> > > >> > > Missing expected images: >> > > >> > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 >> > > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 >> > > >> > > Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) >> > >> > It looks like there was a font rendering change in Rawhide somewhere >> > between 20160812 and 20160820, which makes most of the tests fail. I'll >> > find a couple of hours to update all the needles today if I can. >> >> Are you sure the font rendering change is intentional? > > They usually are. Sure, just wanna make sure you're not doing a bunch of refactoring if the rendering it going to change again, that's all... -- Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora Rawhide-20160822.n.0 compose check report
On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 15:52 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 14:19 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Adam Williamson > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 12:44 +, Fedora compose checker wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Missing expected images: > > > > > > > > > > Cloud_base raw-xz i386 > > > > > Atomic raw-xz x86_64 > > > > > > > > > > Failed openQA tests: 58/89 (x86_64), 17/17 (i386), 1/2 (arm) > > > > > > > > It looks like there was a font rendering change in Rawhide somewhere > > > > between 20160812 and 20160820, which makes most of the tests fail. I'll > > > > find a couple of hours to update all the needles today if I can. > > > > > > Are you sure the font rendering change is intentional? > > > > They usually are. > > Sure, just wanna make sure you're not doing a bunch of refactoring if > the rendering it going to change again, that's all... Wouldn't matter if it did, we *add* needles, we don't replace them. Every so often we get rid of old ones if they haven't been used for weeks; openQA has a bit of the admin interface which tells you when needles were last matched. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
koji failure
hi any idea?
$ fedpkg build
Building openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25 for f25-candidate
Created task: 15341683
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15341683
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe): free
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildhw-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341684 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe): free
15341684 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341684 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed
15341687 buildArch (openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm,
noarch): free
15341687 buildArch (openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm,
noarch): free -> open (buildvm-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341687 buildArch (openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm,
noarch): open (buildvm-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed
15341722 tagBuild (noarch): free
15341722 tagBuild (noarch): free -> closed
0 free 1 open 3 done 0 failed
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildhw-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> free
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildppcle-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildppcle-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: GenericError:
Build already exists (id=793690, state=COMPLETE): {'name':
'openhft-java-compiler', 'task_id': 15341683, 'extra': None, 'pkg_id':
22953, 'epoch': None, 'id': 793690, 'completion_time': None, 'state': 0,
'version': '2.2.5', 'source': None, 'volume_id': 0, 'owner': 1966,
'release': '1.fc25', 'start_time': 'NOW'}
0 free 0 open 3 done 1 failed
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe) failed
$ fedpkg build
Could not execute build: Package openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25 has
already been built
Note: You can skip this check with --skip-nvr-check. See help for more info.
$ fedpkg build
Could not execute build: Package openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25 has
already been built
Note: You can skip this check with --skip-nvr-check. See help for more info.
$ fedpkg build --skip-nvr-check
Building openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25 for f25-candidate
Created task: 15341766
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15341766
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
15341766 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe): free
15341766 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildhw-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341767 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe): free
15341767 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildvm-23.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341767 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildvm-23.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed
15341766 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildhw-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: GenericError: Build
already exists (id=793690, state=COMPLETE): {'name':
'openhft-java-compiler', 'task_id': 15341766, 'extra': None, 'pkg_id':
22953, 'epoch': None, 'id': 793690, 'completion_time': None, 'state': 0,
'version': '2.2.5', 'source': None, 'volume_id': 0, 'owner': 1966,
'release': '1.fc25', 'start_time': 'NOW'}
0 free 0 open 1 done 1 failed
15341766 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe) failed
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: koji failure
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:43:28 AM CDT gil wrote: > hi any idea? > Looks like it was a bad timing issue and you should be able to submit the build for an update. if that does fail you will need to bump and rebuild Dennis signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: koji failure
On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 00:43, gil wrote: > hi any idea? Yes, you're trying to submit a build for a package version that was built already. If you want a new build, you need to bump the release, commit, push and build. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org "Faith manages." -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations" -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: koji failure
Il 23/08/2016 00:53, Dennis Gilmore ha scritto:
On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12:43:28 AM CDT gil wrote:
hi any idea?
Looks like it was a bad timing issue and you should be able to submit the
build for an update. if that does fail you will need to bump and rebuild
Dennis
this was the first build after scm request ... there was not a previous
build or update ...
again:
$ fedpkg switch-branch f25
Branch f25 set up to track remote branch f25 from origin.
[gil@localhost openhft-java-compiler]$ git merge master
Aggiornamento di 37017f3..010eafc
Fast-forward
.gitignore | 1 +
openhft-java-compiler.spec | 76
sources| 1 +
3 files changed, 78 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 openhft-java-compiler.spec
$ git push
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0)
remote: Emitting a message to the fedmsg bus.
remote: * Publishing information for 2 commits
To ssh://g...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openhft-java-compiler
37017f3..010eafc f25 -> f25
$ fedpkg build
Building openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25 for f25-candidate
Created task: 15341683
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15341683
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe): free
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildhw-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341684 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe): free
15341684 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341684 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildvm-08.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 1 open 1 done 0 failed
15341687 buildArch (openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm,
noarch): free
15341687 buildArch (openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm,
noarch): free -> open (buildvm-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341687 buildArch (openhft-java-compiler-2.2.5-1.fc25.src.rpm,
noarch): open (buildvm-19.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 1 open 2 done 0 failed
15341722 tagBuild (noarch): free
15341722 tagBuild (noarch): free -> closed
0 free 1 open 3 done 0 failed
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildhw-04.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> free
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
free -> open (buildppcle-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe):
open (buildppcle-01.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> FAILED: GenericError:
Build already exists (id=793690, state=COMPLETE): {'name':
'openhft-java-compiler', 'task_id': 15341683, 'extra': None, 'pkg_id':
22953, 'epoch': None, 'id': 793690, 'completion_time': None, 'state': 0,
'version': '2.2.5', 'source': None, 'volume_id': 0, 'owner': 1966,
'release': '1.fc25', 'start_time': 'NOW'}
0 free 0 open 3 done 1 failed
15341683 build (f25-candidate,
/rpms/openhft-java-compiler:010eafc57952a68121ef56febccb7abee5e646fe) failed
regards
.g
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG
Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG on 2016-08-23 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting for the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki page](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Modularity_Working_Group) The agenda for the meeting is available at [modularity-wg-agendas pad](http://piratepad.nl/modularity-wg-agendas). Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/4407/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Please bump bz#1017603 to F24
On 08/19/2016 09:51 PM, Christopher wrote: > Interesting... it still won't give me the drop-down box to be able to > change it. > It's weird, because I can change > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308662 > I had assumed it was because of the lack of admin on the older branch, but > if all packagers should be able to do this, then I'm not sure why it > doesn't work for me. Another one I can't bump is > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289919 but I'm not a > maintainer or reporter on that one, so I expected that. > > Is the rule perhaps something like "assignee OR reporter"? AFAIK, any member of "fedorabugs" FAS group (including you) should be able to edit any Fedora bug (unless it's a private bug). Maybe it's a web browser glitch? You can try command-line interface. -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
