Orphaned Packages in rawhide (2017-03-12)
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your package will be retired when the affected package gets retired. Package(co)maintainers Status Change === GLee orphan 17 weeks ago PyKDE orphan, group::kde-sig,6 weeks ago jamatos, rdieter PyQt orphan, rdieter, than 6 weeks ago amplab-tachyon orphan, hchen, java-sig, 8 weeks ago tstclair bootparamd orphan, lnykryn, odvorace 2 weeks ago budgie orphan, cicku, 8 weeks ago williamjmorenor, zsun condor-ec2-enhancedorphan, rrati 7 weeks ago condor-ec2-enhanced-hooks orphan, rrati 7 weeks ago condor-job-hooks orphan, rrati 7 weeks ago condor-low-latency orphan, rrati 7 weeks ago cssed orphan, affix 7 weeks ago eekboard orphan, fujiwara, i18n-team, 2 weeks ago ueno elfinfoorphan, pnemade2 weeks ago flasm orphan 3 weeks ago fontik orphan, i18n-team, ueno2 weeks ago glyphtracerorphan, pnemade2 weeks ago golang-launchpad-go-xdg-v0 orphan, agoode 1 weeks ago greadelf orphan, pnemade2 weeks ago ibus-gucharmap orphan, i18n-team, ueno5 weeks ago jenkins-openid-plugin orphan, java-sig, mizdebsk,3 weeks ago msimacek jung orphan, coolsvap, moceap, 7 weeks ago rrati kfilemetadata orphan, group::kde-sig,5 weeks ago jgrulich, jreznik, nucleo, rdieter, than kimono orphan, group::kde-sig,2 weeks ago jreznik, rdieter, than libgnome-media-profilesorphan, hadess, yaneti 9 weeks ago libkdcraw orphan, group::kde-sig,2 weeks ago jreznik, nucleo, rdieter, than libkgeomap orphan, group::kde-sig 2 weeks ago libkipiorphan, group::kde-sig,2 weeks ago jreznik, nucleo, rdieter, than libqinfinity orphan, dvratil, jgrulich, 2 weeks ago rdieter libqzeitgeist orphan, rdieter, tdfischer 2 weeks ago mj orphan, goeran 9 weeks ago openshift-restclient-java orphan, marcusk3 weeks ago php-fpdf orphan, ke4qqq 9 weeks ago php-htmlpurifier- orphan, ke4qqq 9 weeks ago htmlpurifier php-nusoap orphan, ke4qqq 9 weeks ago php-pear-HTML-Common orphan, remi 13 weeks ago pkgconfig orphan, alexl, caillon,1 weeks ago caolanm, group::gnome-sig, johnp, mbarnes, mclasen, rhughes, rstrode, ssp, teuf, xiphmont python-SimpleCV
Fedora 26-20170311.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Atomic qcow2 x86_64 Server dvd i386 Server boot i386 Atomic raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 46/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170310.n.0): ID: 62922 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62922 ID: 62955 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62955 ID: 62956 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62956 ID: 62974 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62974 ID: 62982 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62982 ID: 62985 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62985 ID: 62990 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62990 ID: 62992 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62992 ID: 62993 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62993 ID: 62995 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62995 ID: 62996 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62996 ID: 62997 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62997 ID: 63004 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63004 ID: 63009 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63009 ID: 63014 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63014 ID: 63027 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63027 ID: 63031 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63031 Old failures (same test failed in 26-20170310.n.0): ID: 62923 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62923 ID: 62942 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62942 ID: 62943 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62943 ID: 62944 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62944 ID: 62954 Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62954 ID: 62958 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62958 ID: 62959 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62959 ID: 62960 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62960 ID: 62968 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62968 ID: 62971 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62971 ID: 62976 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62976 ID: 62980 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62980 ID: 62984 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62984 ID: 62987 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62987 ID: 62991 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62991 ID: 62994 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62994 ID: 62999 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62999 ID: 63002 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63002 ID: 63005 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63005 ID: 63006 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63006 ID: 63010 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63010 ID: 63015 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63015 ID: 63016 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63016 ID: 63017 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/63017 ID: 63018 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa
Re: Unresponsive packager process and reviews
On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 11:06:18AM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Christopher Meng (cicku) was declared unresponsive a while back. > However, there are still a lot of reviews associated with him: > > Submitted by him (60): > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&classification=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&email1=i%40cicku.me&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=7172450&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced Better search: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&classification=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&email1=i%40cicku.me&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=7172480&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced > Assigned to him (23): > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&classification=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&email1=i%40cicku.me&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=7172451&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced > > It seems like we need to have a procedure for dealing with reviews > for unresponsive maintainers as well. ... or just extend the unresponsive maintainer procedure to apply to reviews too, and just reassign all reviews as NEW/nobody when the reviewer is declared unresponsive. Review requests are more complicated. My initial comment was to be that they are not a problem, but random sampling shows that people try to ping the submitter in the review tickets, and of course get no answer. So we should do something to avoid this waste of time. Maybe we should drop a comment in each of those, something like: The submitter of this review request has been declared unresponsive (fesco ticket link), and this review is effectively dead. Anyone who wants to pick up this package, should open a new review request ticket, and close this one as DUPLICATE of the new one. An easier thing would be to make those bugs block FE-DEADREVIEW but that's fairly easy to miss, and not as clear, especially to newcomers. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unresponsive packager process and reviews
On 03/11/2017 07:06 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: Christopher Meng (cicku) was declared unresponsive a while back. AFAICT, his account was closed. It seems like we need to have a procedure for dealing with reviews for unresponsive maintainers as well. Cf. the thread starting at: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/X7VICURDHRH2K5G26SR674LTRCQVOSVB/ I feel, you are complaining about the same issue (AWOLs not being completely processed), but from a different angle. Ralf ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Unresponsive packager process and reviews
Christopher Meng (cicku) was declared unresponsive a while back. However, there are still a lot of reviews associated with him: Submitted by him (60): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&classification=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&email1=i%40cicku.me&emailreporter1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=7172450&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced Assigned to him (23): https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=POST&bug_status=MODIFIED&bug_status=ON_DEV&bug_status=ON_QA&bug_status=VERIFIED&bug_status=RELEASE_PENDING&classification=Fedora&component=Package%20Review&email1=i%40cicku.me&emailassigned_to1=1&emailtype1=substring&list_id=7172451&product=Fedora&query_format=advanced It seems like we need to have a procedure for dealing with reviews for unresponsive maintainers as well. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA DivisionFAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20170311.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Server boot i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) ID: 62807 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62807 ID: 62818 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62818 ID: 62836 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62836 ID: 62840 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62840 ID: 62858 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62858 ID: 62874 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62874 ID: 62880 Test: x86_64 universal install_ext3 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62880 ID: 62889 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62889 ID: 62900 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62900 ID: 62911 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62911 Soft failed openQA tests: 51/107 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 62808 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62808 ID: 62809 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62809 ID: 62810 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62810 ID: 62816 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62816 ID: 62817 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62817 ID: 62826 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62826 ID: 62828 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62828 ID: 62829 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62829 ID: 62860 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_minimal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62860 ID: 62861 Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62861 ID: 62863 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62863 ID: 62864 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62864 ID: 62865 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62865 ID: 62866 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62866 ID: 62867 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62867 ID: 62868 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62868 ID: 62869 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62869 ID: 62870 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62870 ID: 62871 Test: x86_64 universal install_scsi_updates_img URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62871 ID: 62872 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62872 ID: 62873 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62873 ID: 62875 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62875 ID: 62876 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62876 ID: 62877 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62877 ID: 62878 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_partial URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62878 ID: 62879 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62879 ID: 62881 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62881 ID: 62882 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62882 ID: 62883 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62883 ID: 62884 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62884 ID: 62886 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/62886 ID: 62887 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedo
How to ask for package co-maintaining
Hi, what's the right way to ask for package co-maintaining, possibly not epel? Should I use "Request commit ACL?" on pkgdb or "Request commit access" FWIK "request commit access" would request epel too. Thanks Guido ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unretiring Onboard (on screen keyboard)
Ah, missed that bit, sorry. :( Thanks for letting me know, here is ticket if someone is interested: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431322 Cheers! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Unretiring Onboard (on screen keyboard)
Hi Nemanja, On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:26 PM, Nemanja Milosevic < nmilo...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I would like to request admin access to the package Onboard. Onboard is an > onscreen keyboard which I am using on my BayTrail tablet and it works > really well. > > The package was orphaned in 2011 (http://pkgs.fedoraproject. > org/cgit/rpms/onboard.git/tree/dead.package) because it failed to built. > > SPEC file (for the latest version): https://pagure.io/onboard-rpm/ > raw/master/f/onboard.spec > Koji scratch build (x86_64, i686, ARM): https://koji.fedoraproject. > org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18308128 > COPR repo (Fedora 24, 25, 26, rawhide): https://copr.fedorainfracloud. > org/coprs/nmilosev/onboard/ > PkgDB: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/onboard/ > > Please let me know if I can request ownership. Thank you in advance! > Retired Fedora packages require a re-review if they are retired for more than two weeks: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package Bye, Andrea ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
