Re: /bin/sh and lua; was: Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources
On 10/28/2017 03:49 AM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said: FWIW, ISTR being told at some point that it's a good idea to write scriptlets in lua because RPM should *always* be able to run lua scriptlets, whereas at least in theory a scriptlet written in shell script could be hit before /bin/sh is installed and thus fail to run... I don't think that's true - I think an RPM with a /bin/sh scriptlet will get a dependency on /bin/sh, so it shouldn't be installed before /bin/sh. That's not true in general if your package is in turn a dependency of whatever provides /bin/sh. That affects a dozen or so packages in Fedora, according to a quick check. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: /bin/sh and lua; was: Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources
On 10/27/2017 10:36 PM, Colin Walters wrote: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367585 (But currently, as linked from one of the PRs, we just override the Fedora glibc packages' use of lua, since it's unnecessary. It seems strange to me that Florian has time to reply on list here and not review the patch in the BZ...) I don't know what to say on the BZ. The current spec file is buggy: using %posttrans for this step is wrong because it means that many scriptlets will run with the wrong locale archive. The proposed patch does not fix this issue. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: /bin/sh and lua; was: Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources
On 10/27/2017 09:27 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: "FW" == Florian Weimer writes: FW> It's often necessary to use Lua for scriptlets which run reliably FW> because RPM lacks delayed script execution. I guess it depends on how delayed you want them. The ordering is certainly well defined but it's all a bit esoteric. I don't think the point where the cycle is broken is well-defined. Doesn't it depend on the transaction contents? But sure, Lua is there and it works. Unfortunately it lacks usability because it really needs a standard library and more state needs to be visible in the Lua symbol table. The posix module that RPM provides internally is quite useful. The problem is that it's not luaposix, so it can be confusing initially. FW> Furthermore, changes in this area (such as replacing Lua with other FW> mechanisms such as shell scripts) are difficult to test properly FW> because differences in RPM or the repository contents could cause FW> dependency loops be broken at different points. Well, yes, low level distribution work is hard and the environment as you are doing an initial OS install is, at least in the early part of the process, extremely limited. Installs are the easy part. Upgrades are much harder because there are so many more moving parts. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Packages looking for new maintainers
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:24 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote: > If nobody else wants it, I'd take kid3 Transferred, thanks! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Review swap: python-mpd2: It is a Python library which provides a client interface for MPD
Hello, Another simple python package that I'd like reviewed - would someone like to swap reviews please? :) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1507235 (It's holding up the update of another package: mpdris2) -- Thanks, Regards, Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular 27 compose report: 20171028.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-27-20171028.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-27-20171028.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora 27-20171028.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Workstation live i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 9/137 (x86_64), 1/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in 27-20171027.n.0): ID: 162845 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162845 ID: 162941 Test: x86_64 universal install_repository_http_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162941 ID: 162972 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_xfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162972 Old failures (same test failed in 27-20171027.n.0): ID: 162819 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162819 ID: 162843 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162843 ID: 162864 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162864 ID: 162872 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162872 ID: 162874 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start_arm URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162874 ID: 162879 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162879 ID: 162881 Test: x86_64 Workstation Ostree-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162881 ID: 162928 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162928 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/137 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in 27-20171027.n.0): ID: 162931 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162931 ID: 162945 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162945 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in 27-20171027.n.0): ID: 162890 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162890 ID: 162915 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162915 ID: 162923 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162923 ID: 162933 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162933 Passed openQA tests: 121/137 (x86_64), 21/22 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New passes (same test did not pass in 27-20171027.n.0): ID: 162841 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162841 ID: 162842 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162842 ID: 162844 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_selinux URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162844 ID: 162846 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_service_manipulation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162846 ID: 162847 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162847 ID: 162848 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_system_logging URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162848 ID: 162849 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162849 ID: 162850 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_terminal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162850 ID: 162851 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162851 ID: 162853 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162853 ID: 162896 Test: x86_64 universal install_btrfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162896 ID: 162910 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162910 ID: 162950 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162950 ID: 162955 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162955 ID: 162964 Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162964 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 6 packages(s) removed since previous compose: python2, python2-libs, python2-pip, python2-setuptools, python2-talloc, samba-libs Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162474#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/162814#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default: 6 packages(s) removed since previous compose: python2, python2-libs, python2-pip, python2-setuptools, python2-talloc, samba-libs Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.o
Re: /bin/sh and lua; was: Re: common location of spec files in upstream sources
Hi Florian, One problem is that there is a "rpm lua" and a "system lua" making it hard to switch between scriplets and actual scripts. As for bashisms, I don't seen the point of struggling for a smaller shell when everything lately has been about wrapping code in fatter and fatter virtual delivery enveloppes. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Modular bikeshed compose report: 20171026.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Modular-Bikeshed-20171026.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0.00 B Size of dropped packages:0.00 B Size of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size of downgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0.00 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0.00 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
