Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco
On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 04:36:37AM +0100, drago01 wrote: > Same for fedora - if you want to use the trademark. Yes. It's not an unreasonable request. (Although Fedora does offer the secondary "Fedora Remix" mark, and Firefox doesn't have anything equvalent that I'm aware of.) -- Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco
On Friday, December 22, 2017, Adam Williamsonwrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > > > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including > > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more? > > AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstreams changing too much in > Firefox. I don't know exactly where their 'lines' are, but they are > known to assert trademark rights against downstreams to prevent them > changing some things and still calling the result 'Firefox'. (This > policy is why Debian ships 'Iceweasel' or whatever instead - so they > can modify it how they like without Mozilla complaining). > -- > Same for fedora - if you want to use the trademark. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 09:17:27AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including > > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more? > AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstreams changing too much in > Firefox. I don't know exactly where their 'lines' are, but they are > known to assert trademark rights against downstreams to prevent them > changing some things and still calling the result 'Firefox'. (This > policy is why Debian ships 'Iceweasel' or whatever instead - so they > can modify it how they like without Mozilla complaining). There's some definite irony here: this policy is there because there were a number of unscrupulous actors taking Firefox, adding malware toolbars, and offering it for download, thus harming users and tainting their reputation. -- Matthew MillerFedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Rawhide-20171222.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Server dvd i386 Workstation live i386 Server boot i386 Kde live i386 Failed openQA tests: 30/128 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20171221.n.0): ID: 181978 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181978 ID: 181987 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181987 ID: 182045 Test: x86_64 universal install_sata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182045 ID: 182049 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182049 ID: 182066 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182066 ID: 182072 Test: x86_64 universal install_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182072 ID: 182092 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182092 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20171221.n.0): ID: 182010 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182010 ID: 182028 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182028 ID: 182029 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182029 ID: 182039 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182039 ID: 182043 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182043 ID: 182051 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182051 ID: 182052 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_free_space@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182052 ID: 182058 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182058 ID: 182063 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182063 ID: 182067 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182067 ID: 182068 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182068 ID: 182069 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182069 ID: 182070 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182070 ID: 182076 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182076 ID: 182078 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182078 ID: 182079 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182079 ID: 182080 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182080 ID: 182081 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182081 ID: 182082 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182082 ID: 182093 Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182093 ID: 182094 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182094 ID: 182095 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182095 ID: 182096 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182096 ID: 182097 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182097 Soft failed openQA tests: 57/128 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20171221.n.0): ID: 181975 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181975 ID: 181976 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181976 ID: 181977 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181977 ID: 181985 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181985 ID: 181986 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181986 ID: 181995 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/181995 ID: 182046 Test: x86_64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/182046 ID: 182050 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL:
Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 09:17 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including > > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more? > > AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstreams changing too much in > Firefox. I don't know exactly where their 'lines' are, but they are > known to assert trademark rights against downstreams to prevent them > changing some things and still calling the result 'Firefox'. (This > policy is why Debian ships 'Iceweasel' or whatever instead - so they > can modify it how they like without Mozilla complaining). Actually, Debian ships Firefox again these days as the policies apparently have been changed/clarified enough. https://lwn.net/Articles/676799/ AFAICT, there is still little indication as to what modifications may be considered "significant functional changes" by Mozilla though. Benjamin -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEED2NO4vMS33W8E4AFq6ZWhpmFY3AFAlo9RgkACgkQq6ZWhpmF Y3CM6Q/+IoEDD21MGk2Q/GmH1lO6YOO+E214bhvquRmpR8sWZ1g6OSSHKrp/mrfd HvOcMQLD12dCzMQo+VW7Bxlyr2LRBBUYwcWKYvY9e1ZYJ01QCmL5cEFQx554uqbR X8SuPcNMUlBX5RCbt+Z/VCV4g4WlWfzCuc1tJZhcMJwyUFl0oP7h9HTZ9VZCrYwv /ClPH75w1Ia4Iuo40kiJRrXTJUW4KH0z6UiXghXNgGS5qUYTqHvRppo71qqcK1n3 o7wbHMJhjI+f9Fhgkp6IwlK7aAHmaxhUKrtf7f14sEh8AAhLO6Wvy9VJIjgF+CLH NhMJlYYMC2BeLhCTleuZUy/yipbQN/yFPIQQw9EtRmR78vggXfSI5gCQJrn1ceUU OPg2AM3IWYKeJ6P+15bAJFDG+TmmYBqYMH1FsMDxp2jsoc5yLKXTXbeaAsoSdRZg Iy6JhI3gwQ9B5ESeqwUzIUJzl9b7uO8IMWIgv1IbeemP+xqXKFHTnSRXI6HbZF1u OfDJm6SCsSaXcNFjYDUge5W7+Uj5kBYBLIkJVd1l1w8iFCAkFZEmHJd1qsYHyKLa 9mV0qZ7O+cI7yj177NoyHzLcTC1j2epVRPAWPgXZuSGJOLL7oqBhXEivYLp1gxK0 GQoXpxVd62N3aCMRQsRMepOPZ6Cy8QxXWpT+KCeqXZuVSJOT3NY= =s9Ek -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Heads up: SATA kernel change coming to rawhide with a (small) chance of disk corruption!
Hi Hans, thank you very much for working on this! Forgot to give some feedback beforeā¦ I tested your packages for Fedora 27 with my ThinkPad T450s with Crucial MX100 (512GB variant, one of the affected SSDs failing with min_power setting) and TLP. According to powertop it saves about 1.1W in idle compared to normal medium_power. I will do the formal test procedure and add it to the wiki within next days. Greetings, Christian On 22/12/17 17:56, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi All, > > As part of: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife > I'm pushing a change to the Fedora Rawhide kernel to enable the new > med_power_with_dipm sata link powermanagement policy by default on > mobile Intel chipsets (Laptops, NuCs, etc.). > > The good news about this change is that on laptops using a sata disk > it will typically save about 1W - 1.5W of power when the laptop is idle. > > The bad news is that the min_power policy is known to cause data > corruption > with some disks (has been reported with older sandisk ssds and some > crucial > ssds). The new med_power_with_dipm sata lpm policy mirrors the default > Windows IRST lpm settings, so it should be safe to use, but the proof is > in the pudding. > > I've done a blog post a while back asking users to test > this: https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/18412.html and here is a list > of successfully tested systens + disks: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#How_To_Test > > > So far no problems have been reported but if you're running rawhide now > would be a good time to make sure your backups are in order before > upgrading to the next rawhide kernel. > > TL;DR: The next rawhide kernel build contains SATA changes which _may_ > cause disk corruption, they shouldn't, but please check your backups > before updating. > > Regards, > > Hans > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco
On Fri, 2017-12-22 at 07:01 -0500, Solomon Peachy wrote: > > Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including > changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more? AIUI, Mozilla doesn't actually like downstreams changing too much in Firefox. I don't know exactly where their 'lines' are, but they are known to assert trademark rights against downstreams to prevent them changing some things and still calling the result 'Firefox'. (This policy is why Debian ships 'Iceweasel' or whatever instead - so they can modify it how they like without Mozilla complaining). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Heads up: SATA kernel change coming to rawhide with a (small) chance of disk corruption!
Hi All, As part of: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife I'm pushing a change to the Fedora Rawhide kernel to enable the new med_power_with_dipm sata link powermanagement policy by default on mobile Intel chipsets (Laptops, NuCs, etc.). The good news about this change is that on laptops using a sata disk it will typically save about 1W - 1.5W of power when the laptop is idle. The bad news is that the min_power policy is known to cause data corruption with some disks (has been reported with older sandisk ssds and some crucial ssds). The new med_power_with_dipm sata lpm policy mirrors the default Windows IRST lpm settings, so it should be safe to use, but the proof is in the pudding. I've done a blog post a while back asking users to test this: https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/18412.html and here is a list of successfully tested systens + disks: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ImprovedLaptopBatteryLife#How_To_Test So far no problems have been reported but if you're running rawhide now would be a good time to make sure your backups are in order before upgrading to the next rawhide kernel. TL;DR: The next rawhide kernel build contains SATA changes which _may_ cause disk corruption, they shouldn't, but please check your backups before updating. Regards, Hans ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: adding display authorization to other accounts is broken
On 12/21/2017 04:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: Well, no, it's not exactly the same. Using xhost in this way has been a (grudgingly) documented workaround for Wayland's restrictions for some time now: For what it's worth, I also use it for non-root accounts other than my login account, for testing and for administration of common resources that we use via functional accounts. As Adam said, this recently broke, and from my debugging it looked like an ongoing, unfinished/aborted change, that probably has consequences elsewhere, which is why I posted the email to the development list. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 897 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7031 python-virtualenv-12.0.7-1.el6 891 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 781 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 753 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-35e240edd9 thttpd-2.25b-24.el6 364 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-e3e50897ac libbsd-0.8.3-2.el6 93 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-4c76ddcc92 libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el6 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-ed87c07972 hostapd-2.6-7.el6 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-6aaee32b7e optipng-0.7.6-6.el6 12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-3432442a31 shellinabox-2.20-5.el6 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-0143bce8ee python34-3.4.5-4.el6 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-40e722a985 json-c12-0.12.1-2.el6 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-8d7c162c64 tor-0.2.9.14-1.el6 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing libmediainfo-17.12-1.el6 mediainfo-17.12-1.el6 python-keyring-5.0-3.el6 Details about builds: libmediainfo-17.12-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-179815a2be) Library for supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file Update Information: Update to 17.12. mediainfo-17.12-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-179815a2be) Supplies technical and tag information about a video or audio file (CLI) Update Information: Update to 17.12. python-keyring-5.0-3.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f190f4cfd9) Store and access your passwords safely Update Information: Fix warning about not setting GNOME application name in el6, when loading the gnome-keyring-daemon backend (rhbz#924486) References: [ 1 ] Bug #924486 - Avoid spurious warnings from gnome about setting the application name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=924486 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528636] New: Upgrade perl-Task-Weaken to 1.05
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528636 Bug ID: 1528636 Summary: Upgrade perl-Task-Weaken to 1.05 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Task-Weaken Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee: si...@sxw.org.uk Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, si...@sxw.org.uk Latest Fedora delivers 1.04 version. Upstream released 1.05. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528483] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528483 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-580b01c3dc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528493] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528493 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-795ca57f41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528090] perl-Module-Manifest-1.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528090 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Module-Manifest-1.09-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-990c9d9544 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528276] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528276 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-76acdfb7cf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528630] New: Upgrade perl-Net-Appliance-Session to 4.300001
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528630 Bug ID: 1528630 Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-Appliance-Session to 4.31 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Appliance-Session Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee: negativ...@gmail.com Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: negativ...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest Fedora delivers 4.30 version. Upstream released 4.31. When you have free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528627] New: Upgrade perl-Mail-DKIM to 0.50
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528627 Bug ID: 1528627 Summary: Upgrade perl-Mail-DKIM to 0.50 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mail-DKIM Keywords: FutureFeature Assignee: ky...@kylev.com Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: ky...@kylev.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, wtog...@gmail.com Latest Fedora delivers 0.44 version. Upstream released 0.50. When you free time, please upgrade it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528276] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528276 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7a80eaddbd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528090] perl-Module-Manifest-1.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528090 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Manifest-1.09-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-de55bf602f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528493] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528493 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a3ec3e670c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528483] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528483 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-586f0eac44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.005 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring--- hotness's scratch build of perl-Mail-Message-3.005-1.el7.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=23842417 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.005 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring--- Created attachment 1371253 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1371253=edit [patch] Update to 3.005 (#1511243) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1511243] perl-Mail-Message-3.005 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1511243 Upstream Release Monitoringchanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mail-Message-3.004 is |perl-Mail-Message-3.005 is |available |available --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 3.005 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.002-1.fc28 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Mail-Message/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/13324/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1019 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 781 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 363 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-04bc9dd81d libbsd-0.8.3-1.el7 261 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d241156dfe mod_cluster-1.3.3-10.el7 258 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-7ecb12e378 python-XStatic-jquery-ui-1.12.0.1-1.el7 93 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e27758bd23 libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el7 30 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e64eeb6ece nagios-4.3.4-5.el7 19 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d704442ae7 qpid-cpp-1.37.0-1.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-f2055d3f62 shellinabox-2.20-5.el7 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-77cc9084cb nodejs-6.12.2-1.el7 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-30026fdcc1 hostapd-2.6-7.el7 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-ae06399a6b heimdal-7.5.0-1.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-9a67291cf1 json-c12-0.12.1-2.el7 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-263dafc1ae python-mistune-0.8.3-1.el7 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-957aa05f33 heketi-5.0.1-1.el7 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-c3fbd2a463 thunderbird-enigmail-1.9.9-1.el7 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-3970cc8703 global-6.5.6-3.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing MUMPS-5.1.2-2.el7 SuperLU-5.2.0-5.el7 armadillo-8.300.0-1.el7 coin-or-Ipopt-3.12.8-5.el7 gdal-1.11.4-3.el7 global-6.5.6-3.el7 hypre-2.11.2-2.el7 libbson-1.3.5-5.el7 libmediainfo-17.12-1.el7 mediaconch-17.12-1.el7 mediainfo-17.12-1.el7 mld2p4-2.1.0-6.el7 mlpack-2.2.5-3.el7 petsc-3.8.1-3.el7 petsc4py-3.8.1-3.el7 thunderbird-enigmail-1.9.9-1.el7 Details about builds: MUMPS-5.1.2-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e36735026b) A MUltifrontal Massively Parallel sparse direct Solver Update Information: - Related updates to several packages. - Super updated to 5.2.0 - hypre rebuilt for superlu version bump - petsc version bump References: [ 1 ] Bug #1498209 - superlu 5.2.0 on epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498209 SuperLU-5.2.0-5.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e36735026b) Subroutines to solve sparse linear systems Update Information: - Related updates to several packages. - Super updated to 5.2.0 - hypre rebuilt for superlu version bump - petsc version bump References: [ 1 ] Bug #1498209 - superlu 5.2.0 on epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498209 armadillo-8.300.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e36735026b) Fast C++ matrix library with syntax similar to MATLAB and Octave Update Information: - Related updates to several packages. - Super updated to 5.2.0 - hypre rebuilt for superlu version bump - petsc version bump References: [ 1 ] Bug #1498209 - superlu 5.2.0 on epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498209 coin-or-Ipopt-3.12.8-5.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e36735026b) Interior Point OPTimizer Update Information: - Related updates to several packages. - Super updated to 5.2.0 - hypre rebuilt for superlu version bump - petsc version bump References: [ 1 ] Bug #1498209 - superlu 5.2.0 on epel https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498209
Re: Firefox "Looking Glass" fiasco
On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 12:33:20AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > The thing is, the question is whether Firefox even still qualifies as Free > Software at all. We disagree with those actions for a reason, i.e., because > they are attacks on users' freedom! It's Free Software, under every definition of the term. Meanwhile, this not-so-little rant comes to mind: https://caddy.community/t/the-realities-of-being-a-foss-maintainer/2728 "I do find it ironic that the open source community is so irate about having to compile software from source to customize it the way they want." Especially since Fedora's maintainers *already* compile it, including changing some of the defaults. What's a couple more? (And I might add that yanking Firefox as the default browser will accomplish little more than to increase Chrome's market share) - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org Coconut Creek, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528493] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528493 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-795ca57f41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528493] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528493 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a3ec3e670c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528493] perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528493 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Time-HiRes-1.9749-1.fc ||28 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bugfix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528483] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528483 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-580b01c3dc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528483] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528483 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-586f0eac44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528276] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528276 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-586f0eac44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528483] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20171220 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528483 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2017 ||1220-1.fc28 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528276] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528276 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-76acdfb7cf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528276] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528276 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System--- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7a80eaddbd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528276] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528276 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.4 ||4-1.fc28 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528276] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.44 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528276 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528090] perl-Module-Manifest-1.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528090 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Module-Manifest-1.09-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-990c9d9544 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528090] perl-Module-Manifest-1.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528090 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Manifest-1.09-1 ||.fc28 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528089] perl-Module-Install-1.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528089 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Install-1.19-1. ||fc28 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-12-22 04:03:32 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This changes generating build scripts. Suitable for Rawhide only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528090] perl-Module-Manifest-1.09 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528090 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1528089] perl-Module-Install-1.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1528089 Petr Pisarchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|jples...@redhat.com |ppi...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org