[Bug 1560218] perl-MooX-StrictConstructor-0.010 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560218

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-MooX-StrictConstructor |perl-MooX-StrictConstructor
   |-0.009 is available |-0.010 is available



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Latest upstream release: 0.010
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.008-3.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MooX-StrictConstructor/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/15579/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560322] New: perl-DateTime-1.47 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560322

Bug ID: 1560322
   Summary: perl-DateTime-1.47 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-DateTime
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: p...@city-fan.org
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, p...@city-fan.org,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, st...@silug.org,
trem...@tremble.org.uk



Latest upstream release: 1.47
Current version/release in rawhide: 1.46-1.fc28
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/2787/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphaning ofono

[Rex Dieter]

Artur Iwicki wrote:

> Hello, Rex.
> 
> Recently a new version of modem-manager-gui has been released. This new
> release added an option to use ofono as the modem manager. I've updated
> the mmgui package and ran into a problem where the rawhide [1] and F28 [2]
> builds succeed, but the F27 [3] and F26 [4] builds fail, as it seems the
> latest ofono builds for these Fedoras didn't support all architectures, so
> the mmgui build fails due to unsatisfied dependencies.
> 
> Would you possibly be willing to unretire ofono

I haven't retired it yet, and probably won't in the foreseeable future 
(yet).

I'm working on updating it for all fedora releases, and it should be 
available to build against soon.

-- Rex
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: josm orphaned

[Ricardo Martinelli Oliveira]

Jakub,

Can we discuss tomorrow about the package? I'd love to be
co-maintainer since I use josm frequently.

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 5:46 PM, Jakub Jelen  wrote:
> Hello,
> I would like take the package, but other co-maintainers are always welcomed. 
> I filled the following rel-eng ticket:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7409
>
> Regards,
> Jakub
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 1112  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087   
dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7
 875  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f   
mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7
 457  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-04bc9dd81d   
libbsd-0.8.3-1.el7
 355  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-d241156dfe   
mod_cluster-1.3.3-10.el7
 186  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e27758bd23   
libmspack-0.6-0.1.alpha.el7
 124  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-e64eeb6ece   
nagios-4.3.4-5.el7
  29  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3e70a38ad4   
drupal7-7.57-1.el7
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-635348eab4   
php-simplesamlphp-saml2_1-1.10.6-1.el7
  14  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-7150fa5dce   
php-simplesamlphp-saml2-2.3.8-1.el7
  11  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-673b3314a1   
exim-4.90.1-3.el7
  10  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3f41541339   
monitorix-3.10.1-1.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-ae3a1eae7e   
glpi-0.90.5-2.el7
   8  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-add4fc19d8   
mosquitto-1.4.15-1.el7
   2  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-1fbdf7f103   
chromium-65.0.3325.181-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

grive2-0.5.0-2.20171122git84c57c1.el7
libb2-0.98-1.20171225git60ea749.el7
ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7
opencl-headers-2.2-1.20180306gite986688.el7
xorgxrdp-0.2.6-1.el7

Details about builds:



 grive2-0.5.0-2.20171122git84c57c1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-20d950c82b)
 Google Drive client

Update Information:

Update to 84c57c121e03b070f80e1d8fd66749eead7a4d9e to apply bunch of fixes




 libb2-0.98-1.20171225git60ea749.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-91d2ac0fb5)
 C library providing BLAKE2b, BLAKE2s, BLAKE2bp, BLAKE2sp

Update Information:

- New package

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1557766 - Review Request: libb2 - C library providing BLAKE2b, 
BLAKE2s, BLAKE2bp, BLAKE2sp
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557766




 ocl-icd-2.2.12-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f479acb23d)
 OpenCL ICD Bindings

Update Information:

Adds OpenCL 2.2 support.




 opencl-headers-2.2-1.20180306gite986688.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f479acb23d)
 OpenCL (Open Computing Language) header files

Update Information:

Adds OpenCL 2.2 support.




 xorgxrdp-0.2.6-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2018-fa99d9be6b)
 Implementation of xrdp backend as Xorg modules

Update Information:

This version includes fixes of following issues:  - Fix GNOME 3 gnome-settings-
daemon crash issue #111 - Show correct version in Xorg log #114 #115

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1559213 - xorgxrdp-0.2.6 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559213

___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20180325.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 15/137 (x86_64), 5/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 211246  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211246
ID: 211256  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211256
ID: 211257  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211257
ID: 211260  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211260
ID: 211268  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211268
ID: 211269  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211269
ID: 211271  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211271
ID: 211275  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211275
ID: 211276  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211276
ID: 211277  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211277
ID: 211321  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211321
ID: 211331  Test: x86_64 universal install_no_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211331
ID: 211336  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211336
ID: 211340  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211340
ID: 211341  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211341
ID: 211342  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211342
ID: 211343  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211343
ID: 211344  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211344
ID: 211359  Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211359
ID: 211371  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211371
ID: 211372  Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211372

Soft failed openQA tests: 8/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 211224  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211224
ID: 211234  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211234
ID: 211235  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211235
ID: 211239  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211239
ID: 211240  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211240
ID: 211251  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211251
ID: 211254  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211254
ID: 211255  Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211255
ID: 211334  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211334
ID: 211339  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211339
ID: 211350  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211350
ID: 211370  Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211370

Passed openQA tests: 107/137 (x86_64), 14/23 (i386)

Skipped openQA tests: 7 of 162
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

[chicago]

https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git/commit/6502c87ebdf58661e8ff96fe4a3212b5991f8a44

>I agree that using "Fedora Package Source Repository"
>instead of just "Fedora DistGit" is clearer (but also longer
>so I, personally, like your Glossary suggestion the best).

I think it depends on who the audience is... 

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: josm orphaned

[Jakub Jelen]

Hello,
I would like take the package, but other co-maintainers are always welcomed. I 
filled the following rel-eng ticket:

https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7409

Regards,
Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 28-20180325.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 12/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)

ID: 211376  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211376
ID: 211386  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211386
ID: 211418  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211418
ID: 211419  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211419
ID: 211428  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211428
ID: 211431  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211431
ID: 211432  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211432
ID: 211433  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211433
ID: 211437  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211437
ID: 211438  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211438
ID: 211439  Test: x86_64 AtomicWorkstation-dvd_ostree-iso install_no_user
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211439
ID: 211483  Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211483
ID: 211498  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211498
ID: 211499  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211499
ID: 211511  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211511
ID: 211521  Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211521
ID: 211534  Test: i386 universal install_package_set_kde
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211534

Soft failed openQA tests: 7/137 (x86_64), 2/23 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

ID: 211396  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211396
ID: 211397  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211397
ID: 211413  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211413
ID: 211416  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211416
ID: 211470  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211470
ID: 211500  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211500
ID: 211502  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211502
ID: 211504  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211504
ID: 211512  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/211512

Passed openQA tests: 112/137 (x86_64), 17/23 (i386)

Skipped openQA tests: 7 of 162
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560213] perl-DBD-CSV-0.51 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560213

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBD-CSV-0.51-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-af3c99ff31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559195] perl-DBD-CSV-0.50 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559195

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBD-CSV-0.51-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-af3c99ff31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560213] perl-DBD-CSV-0.51 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560213



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBD-CSV-0.51-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-af3c99ff31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559195] perl-DBD-CSV-0.50 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559195



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBD-CSV-0.51-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-af3c99ff31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560213] perl-DBD-CSV-0.51 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560213



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-DBD-CSV-0.51-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-af3c99ff31

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

[Michal Novotny]

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 7:29 PM, Christopher 
wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 4:43 AM Michal Novotny  wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa  wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
>>> > first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with additional
>>> > data storage". My initial reaction to that is "so, it is basically
>>> > just git". My second reaction is "why does additional data storage
>>> > somehow make git (a distributed version control system) even _more_
>>> > distributed?".
>>> >
>>>
>>> I might be misremembering, but I think Dist-Git was originally short
>>> for "Distribution Git". It was the first attempt to marry a binary
>>> store to Git, predating git-annex and Git LFS by several years.
>>>
>>
>> Ha, okay, actually, "distribution Git" makes more sense. Thank you!
>>
>> I've changed it in the README.
>>
>>
>
> Which README? Where is it located?
>

Here: https://github.com/release-engineering/dist-git

I agree that using "Fedora Package Source Repository"
instead of just "Fedora DistGit" is clearer (but also longer
so I, personally, like your Glossary suggestion the best).


>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

[Christopher]

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 4:43 AM Michal Novotny  wrote:

> On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser  wrote:
>> >
>> > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
>> > first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with additional
>> > data storage". My initial reaction to that is "so, it is basically
>> > just git". My second reaction is "why does additional data storage
>> > somehow make git (a distributed version control system) even _more_
>> > distributed?".
>> >
>>
>> I might be misremembering, but I think Dist-Git was originally short
>> for "Distribution Git". It was the first attempt to marry a binary
>> store to Git, predating git-annex and Git LFS by several years.
>>
>
> Ha, okay, actually, "distribution Git" makes more sense. Thank you!
>
> I've changed it in the README.
>
>

Which README? Where is it located?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

OT: Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

[stan]

> > On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 08:56:02PM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:

> On Sat, 24 Mar 2018 23:12:31 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones"  wrote:

> > Just curious: better programming environments … such us?  
 
> Anything in the ML family of course.

So, in looking it up, those languages have been around for almost 50
years, and they haven't "caught on".  Why?  Programmers are usually
quick to pick up something which is better.  What is it about ML family
languages that have caused them to be passed over?

I tried programming in lisp a long time ago, and found it was not a
good fit for the way I think about programming solutions because of its
functional nature. Is that the reason for most people?  To put it
another way, if people don't cut their teeth on declarative languages,
if their first exposure to programming is via a functional language, do
they then embrace functional programming?  Or is it like right and left
handedness, inherent in people, with the majority preferring
declarative?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180325.n.0 changes

[Fedora Branched Report]

OLD: Fedora-28-20180324.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180325.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Server boot s390x
Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-28-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd s390x
Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-28-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Container_Base docker s390x
Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-28-20180325.n.0.s390x.tar.xz
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x
Path: 
Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-28-20180325.n.0.s390x.tar.xz
Image: Everything boot s390x
Path: Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-28-20180325.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180325.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180324.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180325.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:8
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   24
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   4.46 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   2.35 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker aarch64
Path: 
Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz
Image: Scientific_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Jam_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Jam_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Robotics live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Robotics-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Server dvd s390x
Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Server boot s390x
Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.iso
Image: Everything boot s390x
Path: 
Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-Rawhide-20180325.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Xfce live i386
Path: Spins/i386/iso/Fedora-Xfce-Live-i386-Rawhide-20180324.n.0.iso
Image: Minimal raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20180324.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  awesome-4.2-3.fc29
Old package:  awesome-4.2-2.fc28
Summary:  Highly configurable, framework window manager for X. Fast, light 
and extensible
RPMs: awesome awesome-doc
Size: 7.00 MiB
Size change:  2.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 24 2018 Thomas Moschny <thomas.mosc...@gmx.de> - 4.2-3
  - Add BRs on make and gcc.


Package:  byobu-5.125-1.fc29
Old package:  byobu-5.119-5.fc29
Summary:  Light-weight, configurable window manager built upon GNU screen
RPMs: byobu
Size: 155.14 KiB
Size change:  148 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Mar 25 2018 Filipe Rosset <rosset.fil...@gmail.com> - 5.125-1
  - Rebuilt for new upstream release 5.125, fixes rhbz #1480023


Package:  clang-6.0.0-5.fc29
Old package:  clang-6.0.0-4.fc29
Summary:  A C language family front-end for LLVM
RPMs: clang clang-analyzer clang-devel clang-libs clang-tools-extra 
git-clang-format python2-clang
Size: 117.53 MiB
Size change:  8.13 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Mar 23 2018 Tom Stellard <tstel...@redhat.com> - 6.0.0-5
  - Add a clang++-{version} symlink rhbz#1534098


Package:  clusterssh-4.13.2-1.fc29
Old package:  clusterssh-4.09-4.fc28
Summary:  Secure concurrent multiple server terminal control
RPMs: clusterssh
Size: 150.03 KiB
Size change:  5.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Mar 25 2018 Filipe Rosset <rosset.fil...@gmail.com> - 4.13.2-1
  - Updated to new 4.13.2 upstream version, fixes rhbz #1528726


Package:  email2trac-2.11.0-4.fc29
Old package:  email2trac-2.11.0-3.fc29
Summary:  Utilities for converting emails to trac tickets
RPMs: email2trac
Size: 415.62 KiB
Size change:  1.09 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 24 2018 Thomas Moschny <thomas.mosc...@gmx.de> - 2.11.0-4
  - Add BR on gcc.


Package:  gap-pkg-fga-1.4.0-1.fc29
Old package:  gap-pkg-fga-1.3.1-3.fc27
Summary:  Free group algorithms for GAP
RPMs: gap-pkg-fga
Size: 194.71 KiB
Size change:  -1.09 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Feb 07 2018 Fedora Release Engineering <rel...@fedoraproject.org> - 
1.3.1-4
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sat Mar 24 2018 Jerry James <loganje...@gmail.com> - 1.4.0-1
  - New upstream version


Package:  gdal-2.2.3-14.fc29
Old package:  gdal-2.2.3-13.fc29
Summary:  GIS file format library
RPMs: gdal gdal-devel gdal-doc gdal-java gdal-javadoc gdal-libs 
gdal-perl gdal-python3 python2-gdal
Size: 64.00 MiB
Size change:  26.43 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Mar 23 2018 Adam Williamson <awill...@redhat.com> - 2.2.3-14
  - Rebuild for poppler 0.63.0


Package:  kiwi-9.14.0-1.fc29
Old package:  kiwi-9.13.7-2.fc29
Summary:  Flexible operating system image builder
RPMs: dracut-kiwi-lib dracut-kiwi-live dracut-kiwi-oem-dump 
dracut-kiwi-oem-repart dracut-kiwi-overlay kiwi-cli kiwi-pxeboot 
kiwi-systemdeps kiwi-tools python2-kiwi python3-kiwi
Size: 1.52 MiB
Size change:  17.03 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Mar 24 2018 Neal Gompa <ngomp...@gmail.com> - 9.14.0-1
  - Upgrade to 9.14.0 (RH#1560120)


Package:  kubernetes-1.9.6-1.fc29
Old package:  kubernetes-1.9.5-1.fc29
Summary:  Container cluster management
RPMs: kubernetes kubernetes-client kubernetes-devel

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

[Miro Hrončok]

On 25.3.2018 14:25, Kevin Kofler wrote:

I am all for kicking out Python 2 from things such as live images if it is
still on them, for space reasons. But I think it needs to remain available
in the repository.


And we are not saying "python2 needs to get out", we are saying 
"somebody needs to take care of it, we are stepping down (or it needs to 
get out if nobody is willing to do that)".


We are also saying "think about your python2-foo packages, do you 
consider them still useful? if not, nuke them at will, but our 
recommendation is Fedora 29 or 30"


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Request for testing: dbus-broker as system and user bus

[Tom Gundersen]

On Fri, Mar 23, 2018, 6:11 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> On 03/23/2018 04:24 AM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> > Hi Kevin,
> >
> > Thanks for testing!
> >
> > We attempted to keep the logging to a minimum, in particular we try to
> only
> > log in case of a potential problem.
> >
> > The main log message is terse, but we include a lot of metadata (and we
> are
> > open to adding more). Query the journal with `-o verbose` to see more
> > information.
>
> Ah ha. Yep. That gives the sort of info I was looking for.
>
> Might mention that in the man pages or README or change page.
>

Indeed, will do!

Cheers,

Tom

>
> Thanks!
>
> kevin
>
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

[Kevin Kofler]

Silvia Sánchez wrote:
> First, I agree with Richard that packaging two versions is painful.  It's
> also confusing from the other side.  "Install Python. I already have it.
> No, that's Python2, you need Python3. (O_O)"

The packages are already renamed or being renamed to python2*, and the plan 
is also to switch the Provides so that python3 will be the package Providing 
python, not python2. That should solve that issue without having to nuke 
python2.

> Second, I think the earlier we start the better. So there's time to cut
> leafs and replace old libraries in Python2 with equivalents in Python3,
> dropping packages, etc.  By the time, Python2 is definitely deprecated,
> most of the work is done and only some details remain.

I am strongly opposed to removing working software that is still useful for 
users. There is certainly very useful niche software that has not been 
ported to Python 3 yet.

I am all for kicking out Python 2 from things such as live images if it is 
still on them, for space reasons. But I think it needs to remain available 
in the repository.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560253] New: perl-App-cpm-0.963 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560253

Bug ID: 1560253
   Summary: perl-App-cpm-0.963 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: perl-App-cpm
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org



Latest upstream release: 0.963
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.962-1.fc29
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/App-cpm/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring

Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.

Based on the information from anitya: 
https://release-monitoring.org/project/8399/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

[Michal Novotny]

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa  wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser  wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
> > first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with additional
> > data storage". My initial reaction to that is "so, it is basically
> > just git". My second reaction is "why does additional data storage
> > somehow make git (a distributed version control system) even _more_
> > distributed?".
> >
>
> I might be misremembering, but I think Dist-Git was originally short
> for "Distribution Git". It was the first attempt to marry a binary
> store to Git, predating git-annex and Git LFS by several years.
>
> Unlike VCSes like CVS and SVN, Git does not handle binaries very well,
> and so they needed to be moved out of the VCS into an external store.
> This was the first attempt at it, and it works, though no one else
> ever adopted it due to some of the clunkiness with it (the undefined
> sources file format, inability to cleanly define where the sources are
> actually stored, etc.).
>
> Those issues could probably be solved today, but I don't think anyone
> really cares to fix that in a way where Dist-Git would integrate more
> cleanly into Git itself.
>

Oh,  I actually care about it.


>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Avoiding Jargon: dist-git

[Michal Novotny]

On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 12:03 AM, Neal Gompa  wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 6:57 PM, Ben Rosser  wrote:
> >
> > Looking at the dist-git README further reinforces this impression. The
> > first sentence says: "DistGit (Distributed Git) is Git with additional
> > data storage". My initial reaction to that is "so, it is basically
> > just git". My second reaction is "why does additional data storage
> > somehow make git (a distributed version control system) even _more_
> > distributed?".
> >
>
> I might be misremembering, but I think Dist-Git was originally short
> for "Distribution Git". It was the first attempt to marry a binary
> store to Git, predating git-annex and Git LFS by several years.
>

Ha, okay, actually, "distribution Git" makes more sense. Thank you!

I've changed it in the README.

clime


>
> Unlike VCSes like CVS and SVN, Git does not handle binaries very well,
> and so they needed to be moved out of the VCS into an external store.
> This was the first attempt at it, and it works, though no one else
> ever adopted it due to some of the clunkiness with it (the undefined
> sources file format, inability to cleanly define where the sources are
> actually stored, etc.).
>
> Those issues could probably be solved today, but I don't think anyone
> really cares to fix that in a way where Dist-Git would integrate more
> cleanly into Git itself.
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560133] perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.88 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560133

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-WWW-Mechanize-1.88-1.f
   ||c29
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-25 04:34:57



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25955756

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560128] perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.04 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560128

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.04-
   ||1.fc29
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-03-25 04:29:15



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25955452

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

[Silvia Sánchez]

Hi everyone,

First, I agree with Richard that packaging two versions is painful.  It's
also confusing from the other side.  "Install Python. I already have it.
No, that's Python2, you need Python3. (O_O)"
Second, I think the earlier we start the better. So there's time to cut
leafs and replace old libraries in Python2 with equivalents in Python3,
dropping packages, etc.  By the time, Python2 is definitely deprecated,
most of the work is done and only some details remain.
Third, upgrading packages and changing dependencies is no minor tasks. With
time, it can be done silently with testing enough so there are no major
issues.
Side question, what is ML?

Kind regards,
Silvia
FAS:Lailah


On 24 March 2018 at 23:12, Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:

> On Sat, Mar 24, 2018 at 08:56:02PM +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> > On 2018-03-24, 15:09 GMT, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > I'm not personally a fan of either variant of the language
> > > - it's silly that we let programmers use an unsafe, slow, interpreted
> > > scripting language when we've known how to make better programming
> > > environments for at least 40 years.
> >
> > Just curious: better programming environments … such us?
>
> Anything in the ML family of course.
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~
> rjones
> Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
> virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
> software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
> http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org