Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-06-07 16:00 UTC)
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPCmeeting Thursday at 2018-06-07 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 onirc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday ==2018-06-07 09:00 PDT US/Pacific2018-06-07 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <--2018-06-07 16:00 UTC UTC 2018- 06-07 17:00 BST Europe/London 2018-06-07 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin 2018-06-07 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris 2018-06-07 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta New Day: Friday - 2018-06-08 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong2018-06-08 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore2018-06-08 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo2018-06-08 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting = Followups = #topic #691 noarch *sub*packages with arch-specific dependencies.fpc 691https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/691 #topic #693 Wiki:Packaging:RPMMacros.fpc 693https://pagure.io/packaging -committee/issue/693 #topic #714 let's kill file deps!.fpc 714https://pagure.io/packaging-co mmittee/issue/714 #topic #719 Simplify packaging of forge-hosted projects .fpc 719https:/ /pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/719 #topic #726 Review for SELinux Independent Policy packaging Draft .fpc 726https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/726 #topic #743 Add link to C/C++ build flag docs. in redhat-rpm-config.fpc 743https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/743 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. Thereport of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply tothis e-mail, file a new ticket at https://pagure.io/packaging-committ ee ,e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, duringthe open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred untilthe following meeting. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RQ3PUFXH7TJV7MO4TVV5MVGGBPPGVLNN/
Elections for Mindshare - May 2018 - Result announcement
Greetings, all! The elections for Mindshare - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the results are shown below. Mindshare committee is electing 1 seat this time. A total of 107 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 321 votes (107 * 3). The results for the elections are as follows: # votes | name - +-- 205 | Sumantro Mukherjee (sumantrom) - +-- 188 | Nick Bebout (nb) 114 | Itamar Peixoto (itamarjp) Congratulations to the winning candidate, and thank you all candidates for running this elections! [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/mindshare-may-2018 -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z4YY35EGQ4TTJ6TL5EUBJKE4RYGWWLTB/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z4YY35EGQ4TTJ6TL5EUBJKE4RYGWWLTB/
Elections for Mindshare - May 2018 - Result announcement
Greetings, all! The elections for Mindshare - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the results are shown below. Mindshare committee is electing 1 seat this time. A total of 107 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 321 votes (107 * 3). The results for the elections are as follows: # votes | name - +-- 205 | Sumantro Mukherjee (sumantrom) - +-- 188 | Nick Bebout (nb) 114 | Itamar Peixoto (itamarjp) Congratulations to the winning candidate, and thank you all candidates for running this elections! [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/mindshare-may-2018 -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z4YY35EGQ4TTJ6TL5EUBJKE4RYGWWLTB/
Elections for Council - May 2018 - Result announcement
Greetings, all! The elections for Council - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the results are shown below. Fedora Council is electing 1 seat this time. A total of 110 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 220 votes (110 * 2). The results for the elections are as follows: # votes | name - +-- 164 | Till Maas (till) - +-- 115 | Nick Bebout (nb) Congratulations to the winning candidate, and thank you all candidates for running this elections! [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/council-may-2018 -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7Q3RJYCCGHMH4UTZOVYS5POPF653YMJG/
Elections for Council - May 2018 - Result announcement
Greetings, all! The elections for Council - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the results are shown below. Fedora Council is electing 1 seat this time. A total of 110 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 220 votes (110 * 2). The results for the elections are as follows: # votes | name - +-- 164 | Till Maas (till) - +-- 115 | Nick Bebout (nb) Congratulations to the winning candidate, and thank you all candidates for running this elections! [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/council-may-2018 -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7Q3RJYCCGHMH4UTZOVYS5POPF653YMJG/
Elections for Mindshare - May 2018 - Result announcement
Greetings, all! The elections for Mindshare - May 2018 [1] have concluded, and the results are shown below. Mindshare committee is electing 1 seat this time. A total of 107 ballots were cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 321 votes (107 * 3). The results for the elections are as follows: # votes | name - +-- 205 | Sumantro Mukherjee (sumantrom) - +-- 188 | Nick Bebout (nb) 114 | Itamar Peixoto (itamarjp) Congratulations to the winning candidate, and thank you all candidates for running this elections! [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/about/mindshare-may-2018 -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RYLODVRF4BOIHERQD6IR6GMD5QKMX2ZX/
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2018-06-07 - 60% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/06/07/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.9-20180606git791e5aa.fc28.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/32BMHDKIA33WO2R3LD5NLZJ42OYJPMFT/
Fedora Elections May 2018 - Voting period of FESCo elections has started
Hi, the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has just started. Please vote for your candidates to FESCo [1]. You can vote till June 13th, 2018 when the voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC. On Community blog [2] you can also find interviews with all the candidates. Please have a look at it. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/fesco-may-2018 [2] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/tag/may-2018-elections-fesco/ [2.1] Justin Forbes: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-justin-forbes-jforbes/ [2.2] Stephen Gallagher: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-stephen-gallagher-sgallagh/ [2.3] Till Maas: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-till-maas-till/ [2.4] Randy Barlow: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-randy-barlow-bowlofeggs/ [2.5] Petr Šabata: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-petr-sabata-psabata-contyk/ Thanks for your support. Regards, Jan -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FCCOUMKUKTQMQYM4IE56TNBJUIU5QTUO/
Fedora Elections May 2018 - Voting period of FESCo elections has started
Hi, the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has just started. Please vote for your candidates to FESCo [1]. You can vote till June 13th, 2018 when the voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC. On Community blog [2] you can also find interviews with all the candidates. Please have a look at it. [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/fesco-may-2018 [2] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/tag/may-2018-elections-fesco/ [2.1] Justin Forbes: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-justin-forbes-jforbes/ [2.2] Stephen Gallagher: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-stephen-gallagher-sgallagh/ [2.3] Till Maas: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-till-maas-till/ [2.4] Randy Barlow: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-randy-barlow-bowlofeggs/ [2.5] Petr Šabata: https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/fesco-election-interview-petr-sabata-psabata-contyk/ Thanks for your support. Regards, Jan -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FCCOUMKUKTQMQYM4IE56TNBJUIU5QTUO/
python-sphinx_rtd_theme advice
I somehow wound up owning python-sphinx_rtd_theme, I think probably because I was the first person to attempt to do a build that needed it. :-) Anyhow, I am not at all sure that I am competent to be the maintainer. I need some advice. There is a new upstream version available, 0.4.0. I am looking at it right now, and my attempts at unbundling fonts from this package seem to be unraveling. Three font families are bundled: fontawesome, Roboto Slab, and Lato. We have all 3 of these in Fedora, but the problem is that this package wants the web versions of these fonts, too. We have fontawesome-fonts-web, but we do not have .eot, .woff, or .woff2 files available for the other 2 fonts, so far as I am able to determine. Since the .ttf files of those fonts are not byte-equivalent to the ones we ship ... I'm not sure what is safe to do here. I am not any kind of font expert. The upstream tarball is here: https://files.pythonhosted.org/packages/source/s/sphinx_rtd_theme/sphinx_rtd_theme-0.4.0.tar.gz. Any advice on how to deal with those fonts is most welcome. Any offers from someone more competent than me to maintain this package would be gratefully received. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AODTTJDTFI6IJICRHCRCLDCLVHWQB6AV/
Re: Updates to mathematical software
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 10:27 PM Jerry James wrote: > Hello everyone. Months ago, I started working on updates to a couple of > our mathematical packages. But they, in turn, required other packages to > be updated, and those updates required other packages to be updated, and > the whole thing kind of snowballed. I believe that I have finally reached > a point of closure, where I can update the whole pile and have everything > still work afterwards. > I encountered a few problems while doing those builds, mostly on non-x86_64 architectures, but the builds are now all done. If you notice problems with any of this software, please let me know. Regards, -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZXGZ66LUIMTX57VW4OZH74RTWCBFJAZW/
[Bug 1588245] New: perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.05 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588245 Bug ID: 1588245 Summary: perl-Text-SimpleTable-2.05 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Text-SimpleTable Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, iarn...@gmail.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, trem...@tremble.org.uk Latest upstream release: 2.05 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.04-1.fc29 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Text-SimpleTable/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3445/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LGY3SMVTZPZYY5BIUIFUSNIQSGIWA2VH/
[Bug 1588242] New: perl-PAR-Packer-1.044 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588242 Bug ID: 1588242 Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.044 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-PAR-Packer Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 1.044 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.043-1.fc29 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PAR-Packer/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3189/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TD5KSGC35T3I25MSYLBL6NTIRMGNAE5I/
[Bug 1585521] perl-Mojolicious-7.84 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585521 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Mojolicious-7.83 is|perl-Mojolicious-7.84 is |available |available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 7.84 Current version/release in rawhide: 7.82-1.fc29 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RJLDNCHD2BWTIB4GKQPEAUW5QNFQR4OD/
[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49745 - UI - add filter options for error log severity levels
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49745 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49764 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CMARUQDW7T5XS2FNPJFOURFWTTMWDUPD/
[Bug 1585345] perl-Date-Manip-6.72 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585345 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Date-Manip-6.71 is |perl-Date-Manip-6.72 is |available |available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 6.72 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.70-1.fc29 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Date-Manip/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2785/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UQPA6C2QCILHUMGEPN6UOBADT773X7AX/
[Bug 1588216] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.60 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588216 Bug ID: 1588216 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.60 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Latest upstream release: 3.60 Current version/release in rawhide: 3.58-1.fc29 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5881/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/27WX7G2V2GSSW6KICFRLH24PADYXZPQW/
[Bug 1588217] New: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9176 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588217 Bug ID: 1588217 Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-0.9176 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPANPLUS Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, st...@silug.org Latest upstream release: 0.9176 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.917.400-1.fc29 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2733/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EAASAGCIYBBALFNXSLYB56GP6BWALK66/
Retire loki-lib
I would like to retire loki-lib. It's a C++ library that hasn't been updated in nearly 10 years. It FTBS for some releases (circa F23) Repoquery says that nothing in Fedora depends on it. Regards, Sergio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S2XX6OMGDZKKG4ZF6TD4C2FYD4F2VSPA/
[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49702 - Add continuous log refresh option in UI
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49702 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49763 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/V35DAILSO3PQEJ4DPMXVXB6DMDZD4Y3Q/
QA/Development downtime 2018-06-07 2300 UTC - 2018-06-08 0300 UTC
Outage: db-qa server - 2018-06-07 23:00 UTC There will be an outage starting at 2018-06-07 23:00 UTC, which will last approximately 4 hours. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-06-07 23:00 UTC' Reason for outage: Currently the database server on the fedora qa network has only 2 CPUs and limited ram. This is causing problems with waiverdb/resultsdb and other tools needing to get builds in place. The databaseserver will be moved to a different virtual server and given 8 additional cpus and more ram. Affected Services: Bodhi - Waiverdb Greenwave Resultsdb Taskotron OpenQA QA Services Unaffected Services: Fedorapeople Mailing lists Koji buildsystem Ticket Link: Contact Information: Please join #fedora-admin in irc.freenode.net or add comments to the ticket for this outage above. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QDXQB2DAMKW6TBI367L5PDPUIH5KS4UJ/
[389-devel] Please review: Issue 49761 - Fix CI test suite issues
Hi team, https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49761 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49762 Thanks, Simon signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U2ZGXF22ZATUS2TMP7OI5Z5Y5VL3DYGD/
Fedora Rawhide-20180606.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/137 (x86_64), 3/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180604.n.0): ID: 245927 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245927 ID: 245960 Test: i386 Workstation-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245960 ID: 245964 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245964 ID: 245974 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245974 ID: 245976 Test: i386 KDE-live-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245976 ID: 246031 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246031 ID: 246069 Test: i386 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246069 Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20180604.n.0): ID: 245977 Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245977 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/137 (x86_64), 2/24 (i386) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test did not soft fail in Rawhide-20180604.n.0): ID: 245946 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245946 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20180604.n.0): ID: 245939 Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245939 ID: 245940 Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245940 ID: 246024 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246024 ID: 246039 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246039 ID: 246047 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246047 ID: 246054 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246054 ID: 246060 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246060 Passed openQA tests: 124/137 (x86_64), 19/24 (i386) New passes (same test did not pass in Rawhide-20180604.n.0): ID: 245961 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245961 ID: 245962 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245962 ID: 245965 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245965 ID: 246013 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246013 ID: 246050 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246050 ID: 246052 Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246052 ID: 246061 Test: x86_64 universal install_rescue_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246061 ID: 246065 Test: i386 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/246065 Skipped openQA tests: 1 of 163 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload: 4 packages(s) added since previous compose: iproute-tc, libdrm, libpciaccess, linux-atm-libs 2 services(s) removed since previous compose: fedora-import-state.service, fedora-readonly.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/244784#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245918#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi: 4 packages(s) added since previous compose: iproute-tc, libdrm, libpciaccess, linux-atm-libs 2 services(s) removed since previous compose: fedora-import-state.service, fedora-readonly.service System load changed from 1.14 to 1.50 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/244786#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245919#downloads Installed system changes in test i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default: 4 packages(s) added since previous compose: iproute-tc, libdrm, libpciaccess, linux-atm-libs 2 services(s) removed since previous compose: fedora-import-state.service, fedora-readonly.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/244804#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/245940#downloads Installed system changes in test i386 Everything-boot-iso install_default: 3 packages(s) added since previous compose: hwdata, libdrm, libpciaccess 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: fedora-readonly.service System load changed from 0.28 to 0.62 Previous
[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49754 - instances created with dscreate can not be upgraded with setup-ds.pl
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49754 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49760 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/A4EKNEPO2556NRZVLWYXO7B3NBNUOXCF/
[389-devel] please review: Ticket 49734 - Fix various issues with Disk Monitoring
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49734 https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49759 ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/D4RPQUGB4MLMECCLW3A2WDCATEIQIAFY/
Re: [X86] Fwd: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64
On 06/04/2018 06:55 PM, Jeff Backus wrote: Thanks for the insight. Yes, I can see the advantages. However, have things really gotten so bad that it justifies ejecting part of the community? The cost of i686 support is not insignificant. Most of that happens upstream (like features only getting accepted when there's an i386/i686 implementation). There's little we can do about that, but: In fedora, we are also a point of contact for weird bugs which someone needs to triage. I really don't want to do that, but due to the lack of secondary architectures, I'm often forced to because i686 breakage brings development on architectures which I actually care about to a halt. I can justify this work if it helps downstream (so that we can be confident that customers will be able to run their legacy software going forward). But with the current divergence in build flags, it is fairly questionable whether my work can deliver such a benefit, and that is frustrating. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SJ57YLA5XHOYJAAZR3RZBSOPOR4KEO53/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64
On 06/04/2018 03:59 PM, Ian Pilcher wrote: On 06/04/2018 04:28 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: It should, because -march=x86-64 implies just SSE2 and FXSR, and Xeon MP supports both. But the intent is what the subject says: i686 binaries are for running legacy software on x86-64 systems, and nothing more. So the 32-bit x86 SIG would be required to rebuild all of the userspace packages to run on actual 32-bit hardware, right? I don't think so, the binaries should still work on pure 32-bit hardware. But I don't have lab full of 32-bit hardware which can actually install Fedora. I have only proposed what I know I can support. Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TGW2U6ZPHXC5J42KJLWOF5UAYJOJATNK/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64
On 06/06/2018 06:38 PM, Adam Jackson wrote: On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: == Scope == * Proposal owners: Adjust the redhat-rpm-config, gcc, and glibc packages to switch to the new compiler flags. Except for mstackrealign, there is substantial experience with this configuration downstream. Does this change include changing the kernel configuration for i686 to a higher baseline, and if so, which? No. I have no insight into Fedora i686 kernel development, and find it rather odd (viz the removal of NX support). Thanks, Florian ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/53NJQOS4POAP5UQPU2PKWVZ6GMHQENQM/
Intent to update granite to 5.0 (includes an soname bump)
Hi everybody, The elementary project has recently released version 5.0 of their granite toolkit extensions library, which includes an soname bump, and some deprecated APIs were removed. I intend to update the granite package in rawhide next week, and I am fairly confident that this won't cause (m)any issues because I already basically run CI builds of all currently packaged elementary projects on fedora (in COPR), and I don't see any compatibility issues with the latest granite snapshots. Affected packages - According to a repoquery, the packages affected by this soname bump currently are: appcenter audience capnet-assist deepin-wm dippi gala harvey maya-calendar noise notejot pantheon-calculator pantheon-files pantheon-greeter pantheon-photos pantheon-terminal scratch-text-editor screenshot-tool sequeler slingshot-launcher snap-photobooth switchboard switchboard-plug-a11y switchboard-plug-about switchboard-plug-applications switchboard-plug-bluetooth switchboard-plug-display switchboard-plug-keyboard switchboard-plug-mouse-touchpad switchboard-plug-networking switchboard-plug-notifications switchboard-plug-onlineaccounts switchboard-plug-pantheon-shell switchboard-plug-printers vocal wingpanel wingpanel-indicator-ayatana wingpanel-indicator-bluetooth wingpanel-indicator-datetime wingpanel-indicator-keyboard wingpanel-indicator-network wingpanel-indicator-notifications wingpanel-indicator-power wingpanel-indicator-session wingpanel-indicator-sound This list will probably change and/or grow in the next few days, as the elementary people are currently releasing updates in preparation for their 5.0 beta release, and I'm preparing to rename some packages and update others before the rebuild for this soname bump hits. I own all of those packages myself with the exception of "deepin-wm", which will also have to be rebuilt by its maintainer. Update procedure - Since I will have to rebuild these ~50, partially inter-dependent packages, I'm considering requesting a "f29-elementary" side tag to be able to build those packages separately and to avoid possible breakage. I will post an update on this list and notify the deepin-wm maintainer if I decide to request the side tag. Fabio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VPG6UJP6CZLWELR6MHFSURYBMRRG5BW4/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64
On Mon, 2018-06-04 at 10:35 +0200, Jan Kurik wrote: > == Scope == > * Proposal owners: > Adjust the redhat-rpm-config, gcc, and glibc packages to switch to the > new compiler flags. Except for mstackrealign, there is substantial > experience with this configuration downstream. Does this change include changing the kernel configuration for i686 to a higher baseline, and if so, which? - ajax ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5RI7PCUNY4DP2S4YF434WL5CEOTDNTLC/
Improving mactel-boot support for retina mac
Hello all, I am making some headway improving the Fedora look in the Mac firmware picker on Retina screens. 1. Providing retina scaled text The text (as an image) is provided by fedora-logos and linked into /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/.disk_label by mactel-boot. To support retina screens a double scale one should be provided. 1a. fedora-logos I cannot see a README about how the current bootloader/fedora.vol file was created. I have managed to make one with grub2 tools and DeJavu Mono but perhaps it was made with another method? Would fedora-logos take a pull request to add a fedora_2x.vol and fedora.vol.contentDetails file? Would it be preferred to be made with Linux tools (maybe even in the Makefile) or just made in macOS and copied to the git? 1b. mactel-boot I cannot find an official upstream repo for mactel-boot. I have the source from the SRPM though and could provide a patch. Not sure where to send it. 2. Providing retina scaled images (fedora-logos again) This is also something I am working on. I will have a patch for fedora-logos at some point. Currently a utility from libicns is used. At the current release version it doesn't support retina images, but in the master branch they have another tool that should work. However, they haven't done a release for years (I have requested one). This file is made in the Makefile so I think it is best if we continue to render this file in the Makefile. Is this something fedora-logos would take a pull req for? Would fedora-logos be happy with a custom c++ or python util which would assemble the icns file (using imagemagick as currently for the image conversion) if libicns is non responsive? Best, Harry ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3WU46PCIV4X5YYHYGOF5K3AHTVWKCYY2/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: Hide the grub menu
Hi, On 01-06-18 22:29, Peter Jones wrote: On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 12:14:57PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Jason L Tibbitts III said: If we're going to patch grub to expand the set of keys it will watch for, is it possible to just expand the set to encompass all keys? We don't really need to make it that hard to find the grub menu, do we? To add: printing a message to the screen for only a few seconds can be almost useless, as many times monitors take those same seconds to sync to the output of the GRUB screen (it seems to always be in a different mode from the BIOS/UEFI boot screen). One of the outcomes of the work Hans has done and coordinated so far is that on most UEFI machines, we should be able to switch from the graphics the firmware has presented to our own content without a re-sync. So IMHO, taking any key would be good because not only do I not have to remember a specific one or few keys, I don't have to read a message that is only actually visible for 0.2 seconds. Currently the code accepts any key the firmware supports to stop the countdown. That pretty much means: - On most EFI machines we don't detect modifiers that aren't modifying anything: ctrl-a works but ctrl doesn't. Strictly speaking some machines could support this, but we don't have code right now to do it[0]. - Intel-based Mac machines are like the above, but also Ctrl doesn't work at all and will mask us from seeing the other key being pressed. This is because they don't implement the protocol to get key state at all. - If you're on a serial console, F keys don't work (but also they're bad choices to use anyway, because firmware likes to use them a lot.) - In general everything else should work. [0] Maybe something like this; the machine in front of me right now doesn't support it. Someone let me know if it works: https://pjones.fedorapeople.org/0001-EFI-console-getkey-Fix-shift-ctrl-alt-when-pressed-a.patch So this does not work as is, because grub expects grub_getkey() to return e.g. an ascii 'A' for things like SHIFT + A not "A" + the shift mod bit. But it did point me in the right direction to add getkeystatus (which returns modifiers) support to the EFI console code, this is a bit tricky but it works. With this in place I can now make the GRUN menu show when hidden on EFI machines by simply keeping SHIFT held down during boot, which is quite nice. I'm going to submit a pull-req to you with various patches related to the grub work which I've been doing, including the patches for adding getkeystatus to the EFI console code. Regards, Hans ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2JPIXXXNO7VHZTNFYY7SPF6TWWEN2N37/
Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-06-08)
The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-06-08 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below can be found at: https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda = Followups = #topic #1820 Adjust/Drop/Document batched updates policy .fesco 1820 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1820 #topic #1893 Non-responsive maintainer for libinvm-i18n,libinvm-cli, libinvm-cim .fesco 1893 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1893 = New business = #topic #1900 Stop building freeipa server packages on i686 .fesco 1900 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1900 #topic #1902 F29 Self Contained Change: java-11-openjdk - next LTS OpenJDK release and future main JDK in Fedora .fesco 1902 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1902 #topic #1903 F29 System Wide Change: Node.js 10.x as default Node.js interpreter .fesco 1903 https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1903 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual issue. The report of the agenda items can be found at https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4Y7QHTPXAWIUDNKONVOWIEK5BMSHQM3H/
[Bug 1586063] perl-HTTP-Message-6.18 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Message-6.18-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-19cd645f2a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ELLIVWE4BACZKGV2O3XVDBKXOCYTZK7H/
[Bug 1586305] perl-libwww-perl-6.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-66248645f7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WOZRJ3GQVODENAUPMWEBS7SUOV74X3TU/
[Bug 1586067] perl-perlfaq-5.20180605 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586067 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-perlfaq-5.20180605-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9bc6a84980 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/U5JVZ4W4MXHKWDJBGQN56EORB5RDN573/
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180606.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180604.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180606.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 9 Added packages: 19 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 185 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 16.10 MiB Size of dropped packages:4.44 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 8.43 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 217.71 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker aarch64 Path: Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20180606.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.s390x.raw.xz Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Server dvd s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.iso Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Server boot s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.iso Image: Cinnamon live x86_64 Path: Spins/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Cinnamon-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.iso Image: Everything boot s390x Path: Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.iso Image: Server raw-xz aarch64 Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20180604.n.0.s390x.qcow2 = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: R-data.table-1.11.4-1.fc29 Summary: Extension of `data.frame` RPMs:R-data.table Size:9.74 MiB Package: R-showtext-0.5.1-1.fc29 Summary: Using Fonts More Easily in R Graphs RPMs:R-showtext Size:1.54 MiB Package: R-showtextdb-2.0-1.fc29 Summary: Font Files for the 'showtext' Package RPMs:R-showtextdb Size:1.68 MiB Package: miniupnpd-2.1-1.fc29 Summary: Daemon to offer UPnP-IGD and NAT-PMP support RPMs:miniupnpd Size:624.69 KiB Package: mp3fs-0.91-7.fc29 Summary: FUSE filesystem to transcode FLAC to MP3 on the fly RPMs:mp3fs Size:447.31 KiB Package: perl-PPIx-QuoteLike-0.005-1.fc29 Summary: Parse Perl string literals and string-literal-like things RPMs:perl-PPIx-QuoteLike Size:65.76 KiB Package: php-composer-xdebug-handler-1.1.0-2.fc29 Summary: Restarts a process without xdebug RPMs:php-composer-xdebug-handler Size:18.69 KiB Package: php-cs-fixer-phpunit-constraint-isidenticalstring-1.0.0-1.fc29 Summary: Constraint for testing strings considering not-same line endings RPMs:php-cs-fixer-phpunit-constraint-isidenticalstring Size:10.84 KiB Package: php-cs-fixer-phpunit-constraint-xmlmatchesxsd-1.0.0-1.fc29 Summary: Constraint for testing XML against XSD RPMs:php-cs-fixer-phpunit-constraint-xmlmatchesxsd Size:13.88 KiB Package: php-phpunit-php-file-iterator2-2.0.0-1.fc29 Summary: FilterIterator implementation that filters files based on a list of suffixes RPMs:php-phpunit-php-file-iterator2 Size:15.60 KiB Package: php-phpunitgoodpractices-polyfill-1.0.0-1.fc29 Summary: Lacking future-compat polyfills for PHPUnit RPMs:php-phpunitgoodpractices-polyfill Size:9.12 KiB Package: python-hpack-3.0.0-1.fc29 Summary: Pure-Python HPACK header compression RPMs:python2-hpack python3-hpack Size:100.09 KiB Package: python-hyperframe-5.1.0-1.fc29 Summary: HTTP/2 framing layer for Python RPMs:python2-hyperframe python3-hyperframe Size:53.50 KiB Package: rubygem-jekyll-feed-0.10.0-1.fc29 Summary: Jekyll plugin to generate an Atom feed of your Jekyll posts RPMs:rubygem-jekyll-feed rubygem-jekyll-feed-doc Size:253.48 KiB Package: rubygem-jekyll-seo-tag-2.5.0-1.fc29 Summary: Jekyll plugin to add SEO metadata tags RPMs:rubygem-jekyll-seo-tag rubygem-jekyll-seo-tag-doc Size:276.19 KiB Package: rubygem-minima-2.5.0-1.fc29 Summary: Beautiful, minimal theme for Jekyll RPMs:rubygem-minima rubygem-minima-doc Size:268.75 KiB Package: rubygem-minitest-profile-0.0.2-1.fc29 Summary: Outputter to display the slowest tests in a minitest suite RPMs:rubygem-minitest-profile rubygem-minitest-profile-doc Size:233.62 KiB Package: rubygem-minitest-reporters-1.3.0-1.fc29 Summary: Create customizable Minitest output formats RPMs:rubygem-minitest-reporters rubygem-minitest-reporters-doc Size:501.55 KiB Package: rubygem-ruby-progressbar-1.9.0-1.fc29 Summary: Ruby/ProgressBar is a flexible text progress bar library RPMs:rubygem-ruby-progressbar rubygem-ruby-progressbar-doc Size:313.38 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: blogilo-17.08.1-1.fc28 Summary: Blogging Client RPMs:blogilo blogilo-libs Size:4.11 MiB Package: linux-igd-1.0-24.fc27 Summary: The Linux UPNP Internet GATEWAY DEVICE RPMs:linux-igd Size
Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 4:39 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: I am actually very curious about the results of such a move, and know whether it is going to have a significant impact today. Debian has already tried experimenting with it: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00166.html But OpenSSL is not used by browsers. I think the debate here is whether fedora (and in general operating systems) can afford to be stricter than the browsers. As an OS our attack surface is much larger than the browser setup, and thus it makes sense (to me), to be more careful. You previously said in this thread that the system policy *will* be used by browsers. I would not be concerned if we had a separate policy that was suitable for use by browsers, which could be used by Firefox, glib-networking, etc. But we don't, and it's not proposed here. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QWP2MRLDBDGS4IS5C6NJHXCQDJSM4BQL/
[Bug 1586063] perl-HTTP-Message-6.18 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Message-6.18-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-92bfc6b328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PT64CUDTEAQZS5Y2FSXJ7TADQR73VL2Z/
[Bug 1586305] perl-libwww-perl-6.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-726fd94741 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DU5TMGALXSR6KWKFKUR2Q62TEEA5TRD7/
[Bug 1586067] perl-perlfaq-5.20180605 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586067 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-perlfaq-5.20180605-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bd8df6e436 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7XOLKQIAKAQF5ADBXET66QY3NHS4OXOC/
Re: Perl modules looking for new owners
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] : > > > > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: > > > > perl-Array-Diff > > perl-Class-Field > > perl-Class-MethodMaker > > perl-Data-Section > > perl-Software-License > > I'll gladly take ownership of these packages. > My FAS username is eseyman Thankyou, they are yours now :-) Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AS3PGJDQ7NVXHWCBB3ULTCMAYID7ZSRR/
Re: Perl modules looking for new owners
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 02:28:24PM +0200, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: > * Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] : > > > > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: > > > > perl-Array-Diff > > perl-Class-Field > > perl-Class-MethodMaker > > perl-Data-Section > > perl-Software-License > > I'll gladly take ownership of these packages. > My FAS username is eseyman Thankyou, they are yours now :-) Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AS3PGJDQ7NVXHWCBB3ULTCMAYID7ZSRR/
[Bug 1578594] perl-BSON-v1.6.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578594 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CJ2O55DCMGZKWJBZALYEOAODDFPUO7ZX/
[Bug 1579574] perl-BSON-v1.6.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1579574 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UBQAOQ4DU4JTCDWVISEDCQXU7SUI6VA5/
[Bug 1582336] perl-BSON-v1.6.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582336 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2AYYPAMNOCE4YPINIYQ3ILZNIZ5QCZ7C/
[Bug 1582677] perl-BSON-v1.6.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582677 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-BSON-1.6.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XMIEF67EFGLN5MEF6IGR55JG5E7LN52H/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2
On 06/06/2018 08:05 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: On 2018-06-05, John Florian wrote: Makes sense, but what is the best way to deal with such old HW if you're stuck with it? I don't want to compromise my workstation for all my normal needs just to deal with some ancient embedded https server, but it would kind of suck to have to boot some old live image just to do some routine config change. It seems the industry has room for improvement here. Firefox has a white list for domain names: security.tls.insecure_fallback_hosts. Okay, that's good to know. As long as that continues to work should this proposal go in effect that seems like a great compromise of having sound security by default but allowing manual, per-site overrides where necessary. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UPLPXB5H3V2S53SBW7O2LSDMSRU5CMBV/
[Test-Announce] Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180606.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 29 Rawhide 20180606.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: pungi - 20180603.n.1: pungi-4.1.25-3.fc29.src, 20180606.n.0: pungi-4.1.25-4.fc29.src lorax - 20180603.n.1: lorax-29.5-1.fc29.src, 20180606.n.0: lorax-29.6-1.fc29.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/29 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Rawhide_20180606.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Rawhide_20180606.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Rawhide_20180606.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Rawhide_20180606.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Rawhide_20180606.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Rawhide_20180606.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_29_Rawhide_20180606.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QT2Q6O2K35ZANZVEXCOD22KLA2RTX7VK/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QT2Q6O2K35ZANZVEXCOD22KLA2RTX7VK/
Re: Can't fork in src.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, Jun 01, 2018 at 02:07:03PM -0400, Christopher wrote: >On Fri, Jun 1, 2018 at 5:35 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon >wrote: > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 07:25:41PM -0400, Christopher wrote: > >Â Â When I try to fork rpms/thrift, I get the error message:Ã*Â Repo > >Â Â "forks/ctubbsii/thrift" already exists. > > > >Â Â However, it clearly does not exist. It is not listed > >Â Â atÃ*Â https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/ctubbsiiÃ*Â , which > shows 0 forks. > > > >Â Â Perhaps I forked it in the past, and the delete did not get > cleaned up > >Â Â correctly? I don't know. > > That is basically it, the git repo still existed on disk so it couldn't > create > the new one. > > I nuked the one on disk and you should be able to fork rpms/thrift again > :) > >I think the problem might go deeper than that. I just tried again and got >the same error. I wonder if this failure (whatever caused it) created >stuff on disk again. I've clean things on disk, do you think you could drop by on #fedora-admin and ping me before trying again so I can tail the logs and see if you're triggering a bug on pagure or if there is something wrong elsewhere. Thanks, Pierre ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AHC6WXQ5NCUF3KD5VZN4BUJY2IVXTZTX/
Re: Detecting building package on rawhide
On 06/06/2018 02:24 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
Checking rpm --showrc, I can see rawhide sets %{fedora} to 29 and
there does not seem any mention of rawhide in the showrc output.
What would people recommend to distinguish rawhide from non-rawhide?
The mass rebuild, if there is any, happens before rawhide turns into
non-rawhide, so there is simply no distinction whatsoever, and there
cannot be.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DZOGZ6Q2YI42ZRZZBIW5HVQL2M7KDXNI/
[rpms/perl-BSSolv] PR #1: Rebase to 0.14
ngompa merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-BSSolv` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Rebase to 0.14 `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-BSSolv/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QQTSJRRVO3UAISDYUZCPL5UEG56EUAUR/
[Bug 1587982] perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1c841646c0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6ZTAQN2BDNXRJ4XNA3PVEVXBKXKSWCTM/
[Bug 1587982] perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dbcbe02783 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/57AFOW74PMROLVNQJB6DKJ6GYCPE7653/
[Bug 1587982] perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0. ||90-1.fc29 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BNZWI32NWHGG2CRYAO3NWO2IQOJY57YR/
Re: Perl modules looking for new owners
* Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] : > > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: > > perl-Array-Diff > perl-Class-Field > perl-Class-MethodMaker > perl-Data-Section > perl-Software-License I'll gladly take ownership of these packages. My FAS username is eseyman Emmanuel ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZGCOIQ4ARQ33HYD2AB5NBYVJ3CGZGDXA/
Re: Perl modules looking for new owners
* Daniel P. Berrangé [06/06/2018 13:04] : > > Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: > > perl-Array-Diff > perl-Class-Field > perl-Class-MethodMaker > perl-Data-Section > perl-Software-License I'll gladly take ownership of these packages. My FAS username is eseyman Emmanuel ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZGCOIQ4ARQ33HYD2AB5NBYVJ3CGZGDXA/
Detecting building package on rawhide
Hello,
I try to create SWID Tags for Fedora and I'd like to be able to
distinguish when running the rpm build on rawhide, as opposed to
"released" version.
Checking rpm --showrc, I can see rawhide sets %{fedora} to 29 and
there does not seem any mention of rawhide in the showrc output.
What would people recommend to distinguish rawhide from non-rawhide?
For now I'm running the builds in copr but eventually I'd like for
it to work in koji as well.
Thank you,
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Security Engineering, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ON4QIMJVCBCRHDTJKEE2S6GCT7JC6ABI/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: i686 Is For x86-64
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, at 2:38 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > El mar, 05-06-2018 a las 15:59 -0400, Adam Jackson escribió: > > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 13:20 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > > > > as part of this change I suspect we would need to make kernel > > > changes > > > to stop building a i686 kernel, and all i686 deliverables would > > > stop > > > being made. > > > > We would? > It may be a bad assumption on my part, I am assuming that > optimising to> run on x86_64 means that we will not be able to run on any > actual > x86_32 hardware. > > Dennis > The optimisation proposed here wouldn’t technically prevent running on P4 systems or the atoms that have been mentioned, as I understand it. These systems would still benefit from a 32-bit kernel. For reference, the last CPU I used that didn’t have SSE2 support was an Athlon XP - introduced to compete with the P4 but actually had the instruction set of a PIII more or less. I remember this because I tried to run OpenSolaris on it. Which even about 15 years ago, required SSE2 How about instead of proposing to drop support for anything not using x86-64 this was pushed as a proposal to stop supporting anything that doesn’t do SSE2 (which seems to be the actual proposal) - does it sound any different now? To me, it does - because I’d suspect P4 and some Atom chips covers quite a range of hardware that people still use. Whether it’s worth running such a P4 machine nowadays is another question of course, given how power hungry they are for not much compute power... To me? It’s perhaps worth dropping non-SSE2 support but i wouldn’t stop building kernels for 32-bit Michael ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines> List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZZ65EEUBDU7YHBUYKQ2X5IYX7KSSTDID/> > Email had 1 attachment: > + signature.asc > 1k (application/pgp-signature) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SS5IU7ORUY2IIFYZKPG7IG5JXGLEZYIM/
[Bug 1587982] New: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1587982 Bug ID: 1587982 Summary: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build-0.90 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-CPANPLUS-Dist-Build Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Latest upstream release: 0.90 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.88-5.fc29 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPANPLUS-Dist-Build/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2734/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MIZYFNM4SPSE4ANX3Z7AFNZK4QEOYA6M/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2
On 2018-06-05, John Florian wrote: > Makes sense, but what is the best way to deal with such old HW if you're > stuck with it? I don't want to compromise my workstation for all my > normal needs just to deal with some ancient embedded https server, but > it would kind of suck to have to boot some old live image just to do > some routine config change. It seems the industry has room for > improvement here. Firefox has a white list for domain names: security.tls.insecure_fallback_hosts. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LAQ3KCXRV7Y6YBLATE5ALGKVTEW7W7ZG/
Perl modules looking for new owners
Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for apps I needed at the time. I've been doing a pretty awful job of maintaining many of them though, as my need for most has gone away and I'm overworked with other stuff. Fortunately various people people in Perl SIG have been doing a good job picking up much of the slack. Thus I figure it is overdue to formally release my ownership of many of them, and let someone who actively cares be official point of contact. Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: perl-Array-Diff perl-Class-Field perl-Class-MethodMaker perl-Data-Section perl-Gnome2-Vte perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse perl-Module-ExtractUse perl-Software-License perl-Test-YAML-Meta perl-Test-YAML-Valid I will orphan the above if no one steps forward to own them. There are a few others which are pre-requisites of techtalk-pse, and or perl-Sys-Virt-TCK: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection perl-Cairo-GObject perl-Gtk3 perl-accessors perl-TAP-Formatter-HTML perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit If someone wishes to be official owner I'll happily release them, but I won't orphan them if no one steps up, since I still need them in Fedora. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MJ3H62ZMAG6366QBFFVH3F5HONNRDCAX/
Perl modules looking for new owners
Over the years I've added a number of Perl modules to Fedora for apps I needed at the time. I've been doing a pretty awful job of maintaining many of them though, as my need for most has gone away and I'm overworked with other stuff. Fortunately various people people in Perl SIG have been doing a good job picking up much of the slack. Thus I figure it is overdue to formally release my ownership of many of them, and let someone who actively cares be official point of contact. Thus I'm looking for new primary owners for the following: perl-Array-Diff perl-Class-Field perl-Class-MethodMaker perl-Data-Section perl-Gnome2-Vte perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse perl-Module-ExtractUse perl-Software-License perl-Test-YAML-Meta perl-Test-YAML-Valid I will orphan the above if no one steps forward to own them. There are a few others which are pre-requisites of techtalk-pse, and or perl-Sys-Virt-TCK: perl-Glib-Object-Introspection perl-Cairo-GObject perl-Gtk3 perl-accessors perl-TAP-Formatter-HTML perl-TAP-Formatter-JUnit If someone wishes to be official owner I'll happily release them, but I won't orphan them if no one steps up, since I still need them in Fedora. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o-https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o-https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org-o-https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MJ3H62ZMAG6366QBFFVH3F5HONNRDCAX/
Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs
On 06/06/2018 03:04 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Friday, 01 June 2018 at 12:53, Hans de Goede wrote: >> On 01-06-18 11:54, Tomas Kovar wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I have two suggestions: >>> >>> - on UEFI systems, would it be possible to use an EFI variable to force >>> grub menu? That way, it would be possible to enter the menu from UEFI boot >>> loader or shell, even if the system itself is in non-working state or on >>> read-only device. >> That is a good idea I've added looking into this to my TODO list. > What about UEFI systems where there's no way to get into EFI shell > because firmware is deliberately broken by the vendor to prevent > booting anything apart from Windows? I managed to get Fedora booting > with SecureBoot enabled on my system only by manually setting the > name of its boot entry to "Windows Boot Manager". There's no option > to boot anything else because any BootNext/BootOrder options set > with efibootmgr get ignored. I'm sure my machine is not an exception > in this regard, so you cannot rely on users being able to do anything > before GRUB comes up. > > Disabling the GRUB menu and shortening timeouts is a bad idea in my > opinion. You don't boot so often these days and when you need to > access the GRUB menu, you usually do because something is broken and > you don't want to poke around the internet to find out how to do that > in Fedora because you might even have no internet access. There needs > to be a clear hint on the screen how to access the menu visible long > enough for the user to read it. I especially think that if you're going to show *anything*, it might as well be the menu itself. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BZR2RHULJDJ7BU6F4DL3HFTYBF2PBF7Y/
[Bug 1582164] perl-Data-Types-0.13 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1582164 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Types-0.13-1.fc29 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-06-06 06:19:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FBTCLSU6BKMKIIMR7TMODZUENHFUWSC4/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 11:41 -0500, mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote: > On Tue, Jun 5, 2018 at 4:14 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos > wrote: > > Note that this change, if applied, includes browsers shipped by > > fedora > > (i.e., firefox). That is pretty much all or nothing plan, either we > > bump the defaults for all software, or for none. > > Nikos, I'm really surprised to see you commenting here without > saying anything for or against the change. > Surely this will break a large number of websites? I am actually very curious about the results of such a move, and know whether it is going to have a significant impact today. Debian has already tried experimenting with it: https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/08/msg00166.html > And, if not, then surely we should be able to first convince > upstream > Firefox and Chrome to drop support for TLS 1.0 and 1.1? I would not > have any objections if these upstreams were to take the step first. > Yet that seems extremely unlikely. I think the debate here is whether fedora (and in general operating systems) can afford to be stricter than the browsers. As an OS our attack surface is much larger than the browser setup, and thus it makes sense (to me), to be more careful. Can we afford to break a significant part of our users? Of course not, but I think that this change is eventually happening, especially with TLS1.3 expected to be deployed widely, and it seems to me that we only wait to see who will do the first step. regards, Nikos ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DG6SUTE6PJIJ5PYLUM6ZSMEHFTO2SSO3/
Re: Fedora Elections May 2018 - The last day of Voting period for Council and Mindshare elections
Please let me remind that today (June 6th, 2018) is the last day of the Voting period to Fedora Council [1] and Mindshare Committee [2]. You can vote till 23:59:59 UTC. Interviews can be found on Community blog [3]. [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/council-may-2018 [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/mindshare-may-2018 [3] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/2018-may-elections-council-mindshare-interviews Thanks for your support. Regards, Jan On Thu, May 31, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > Hi, > > the Voting period of the currently running Fedora Elections [0] has > just started. Please vote for your candidates to Council [1] and > Mindshare [2]. > You can vote till June 6th, 2018 when the voting ends at 23:59:59 UTC. > > On Community blog [3] you can also find interviews with all the > candidates. Please have a look at it. > > [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections > [1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/council-may-2018 > [2] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/voting/vote/mindshare-may-2018 > [3] https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/tag/elections/ > > Thanks for your support. > Regards, > Jan -- Jan Kuřík JBoss EAP Program Manager Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FCV6TR537WGIOKFIBPSRFDVNZPWNPHFF/
Re: F29 System Wide Change: Strong crypto settings: phase 2
On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 16:34 -0400, John Florian wrote: > On 06/05/2018 12:25 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-06-05 at 16:11 +, Christian Stadelmann wrote: > > > "Fallback option" always smells like "protocol downgrade attack". > > > This would undermine the idea of a crypto policy. Anyway, > > > implementing it seems way out of scope for the crypto policy. > > > > Yes, a fallback option is a no-way. You can switch the system > > policy to > > LEGACY, however that does not necessarily mean that some very old > > legacy HW will start to work with Firefox or another web browser, > > because with newer versions of the browsers and newer versions of > > TLS/crypto libraries some very old and insecure algorithm and > > protocol > > support is being also removed. > > > > Makes sense, but what is the best way to deal with such old HW if > you're > stuck with it? I don't want to compromise my workstation for all my > normal needs just to deal with some ancient embedded https server, Isn't this what we are actually doing to fedora? We keep options which we know they are insecure in the default settings to achieve compatibility. This change is about switching to secure mode by default. regards, Nikos ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JRLMUVA7DDDYWATWMQHMX2VSIP4F6GKB/
Re: Self Introduction
On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 12:48 PM, Feather Lin wrote: > Hello Jerry, > Thank you! (謝謝！） Yes the 歡迎光臨 is mean welcome the people. Welcome! Feel free to check out the methods to contact the 中文 user group.[1] [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Zh -robin 李瑞彬 > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ASYNZJW6TGIU4GIUYWKCJPIBEWF6GZHK/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HP2D4PY7NUYYWFAYLEN2MZLFL5D6NTSY/
Re: Valid use case for modularity or not?
On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:36 AM Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:16 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:13 AM Adam Samalik wrote: >> >> >> >> > On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 11:05 AM, Fabio Valentini >> wrote: >> >> >> On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 10:58 AM Petr Šabata wrote: >> >> >> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 05:00:43PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> >> > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:44 PM Neal Gompa >> wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 9:35 AM Fabio Valentini < >> decatho...@gmail.com> >> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > >> >> > > > > Hi all, >> >> > > >> >> > > > > I think I finally found a scenario where building some of my (and >> >> > > > others') packages as modules would be beneficial. >> >> > > >> >> > > > > The situation is: >> >> > > >> >> > > > > - The syncthing package has a lot of golang dependencies. >> >> > > > > - Some of them are too old in fedora, even in fedora rawhide, and >> >> some >> >> > > of >> >> > > > them have not been touched in years. >> >> > > > > - However, some other packages may depend on those older >> versions, >> >> or >> >> > > the >> >> > > > packagers don't have time to check for compatibility. >> >> > > >> >> > > > > The idea for a solution I came up with: >> >> > > >> >> > > > > - Build syncthing as a module. >> >> > > > > - Add "syncthing" branches to all incompatible dependencies (I >> >> guess I >> >> > > > have to request commit/admin access to do that for packages I don't >> >> own >> >> > > > yet?). >> >> > > > > - Update those branches to use the exact same commit as the >> vendored >> >> > > > sources in upstream syncthing. >> >> > > > > - Use those modules as dependencies for the syncthing module. >> >> > > >> >> > > > > Is that a valid, feasible use case of modularity? >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > > You can kind of pigeonhole it into that, but I think you might be >> >> better >> >> > > > served by vendoring things you can't use from Fedora packages and >> >> going >> >> > > > from there. >> >> > > >> >> > > > The problem is that you're touching other people's packages and >> hoping >> >> > > they >> >> > > > don't make those branches go away. And at the end of it, the output >> >> would >> >> > > > be a single package that lives outside of the normal repo metadata >> and >> >> > > only >> >> > > > modularity-enabled clients would be able to install it. >> >> > > >> >> > > > The excludes most of the package managers that people can use in >> >> Fedora >> >> > > > right now. >> >> > > >> >> > > > It might make sense if you could describe which dist-git commit to >> >> use in >> >> > > > the module definition, regardless of what's actually released in >> the >> >> main >> >> > > > repos, and it would just build from those until you upgrade it. >> That >> >> would >> >> > > > avoid the need for branches in all the golang packages you need for >> >> > > > syncthing. >> >> > > >> >> > > I don't think that would be the case. >> >> > > An upstream commit that's newer than anything that has ever been >> >> packaged >> >> > > before for a fedora branch is never available, not even if I could >> >> target >> >> > > other dist-git commits. That's why I thought of modularity. >> >> >> > I might not be following but: >> >> >> > * you can link to any git refs -- branches, tags, or commits >> >> >> Yes, Neal also pointed that out to me - but it doesn't help if the >> required >> >> dependency has to be newer than anything that has ever been packaged for >> >> fedora, does it? >> >> >> > Modules can only include RPM packages — so having an upstream dependency >> which is not packaged is not gonna work. But if you package it yourself >> (possibly in a stream branch), you'll be fine. >> >> Yes, that's exactly what I would do, because the "normal" branches of those >> dependencies can't / won't be updated to the version I need because of >> arising conflicts. > > > Exactly. > > I'm one of the people directly involved with Modularity — feel free to ask me questions, I'm happy to help. Thank you! This time I was able to successfully herd the gophers far enough to be able to push my update for syncthing. However, since the golang ecosystem seems to get worse over time, I'll come back if I have questions regarding the modularity route :) Fabio >> >> >> >> >> >> > * if you branch the dependencies, it's really up to you to maintain >> >> >those; that also means you can use any versions and patches >> >> >> > I think modularity could solve your problem provided that you >> >> > are fine with the syncthing module overriding those dependency >> >> > packages when people enable it. >> >> > Neal's comment on support in package managers is valid. >> >> > This will get better over time but the current state of things >> >> > is also something to consider. >> >> >> > P >> >> > ___ >> >> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to
Re: Hiding the grub menu by default on single OS installs
On Friday, 01 June 2018 at 12:53, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 01-06-18 11:54, Tomas Kovar wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I have two suggestions: > > > > - on UEFI systems, would it be possible to use an EFI variable to force > > grub menu? That way, it would be possible to enter the menu from UEFI boot > > loader or shell, even if the system itself is in non-working state or on > > read-only device. > > That is a good idea I've added looking into this to my TODO list. What about UEFI systems where there's no way to get into EFI shell because firmware is deliberately broken by the vendor to prevent booting anything apart from Windows? I managed to get Fedora booting with SecureBoot enabled on my system only by manually setting the name of its boot entry to "Windows Boot Manager". There's no option to boot anything else because any BootNext/BootOrder options set with efibootmgr get ignored. I'm sure my machine is not an exception in this regard, so you cannot rely on users being able to do anything before GRUB comes up. Disabling the GRUB menu and shortening timeouts is a bad idea in my opinion. You don't boot so often these days and when you need to access the GRUB menu, you usually do because something is broken and you don't want to poke around the internet to find out how to do that in Fedora because you might even have no internet access. There needs to be a clear hint on the screen how to access the menu visible long enough for the user to read it. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2QHAMBHS7FA6OXQWNH4CXGL4WXWWGMKA/
[Bug 1586305] perl-libwww-perl-6.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-726fd94741 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4VO7CT6LFAHJKV242UEVNKGV6SSFDELV/
[Bug 1586305] perl-libwww-perl-6.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-66248645f7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6IILVY6LHICG6JF7XFFNPEUMDKGOH3EY/
[Bug 1586305] perl-libwww-perl-6.34 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586305 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-libwww-perl-6.34-1.fc2 ||9 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VOVBXZDL6ECIEBUEUUDFWERVG3I2PNRF/
[Bug 1586063] perl-HTTP-Message-6.18 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Message-6.18-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-92bfc6b328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DKOPPSXNP7UKKW74LTE2G54WARK3U4QV/
[Bug 1586063] perl-HTTP-Message-6.18 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1586063 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Message-6.18-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-19cd645f2a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HW2IUTOA6VUIJR5UOKOD4ABYIV7N2XNZ/
