Re: Orphaning: llvm5.0, clang5.0, llvm6.0, clang6.0
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/beignet/ Last commits are from 2018/08 which is half year ago. I'd like to keep it, but try using master branch. BTW, somebody picked up llvm6 package, so I suppose he will fix all the bugs there :) On Sat, Feb 9, 2019, 04:32 Tom Stellard On 01/28/2019 04:30 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 01/28/2019 02:47 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >> It would be great if you would include list of dependent packages + > >> their maintainers. > >> > > > > Here is the list of dependent packages: > > > > Maintainers by package: > > beignet ignatenkobrain > > Igor, > > What do you think about orphaning beignet too? > There have been no updates to the project in over a year: > https://github.com/intel/beignet/commits/master > > -Tom > > > ghdl sailer > > ispc luya slaanesh > > iwyu daveisfera > > ldc bioinfornatics cicku kalev > > rtagsgicmo > > > > Packages by maintainer: > > bioinfornatics ldc > > cicku ldc > > daveisfera iwyu > > gicmo rtags > > ignatenkobrain beignet > > kalev ldc > > luya ispc > > sailer ghdl > > slaanesh ispc > > > > -Tom > > > >> You can use > https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities/blob/master/f/find-package-maintainers > >> for finding maintainers. > >> > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:42 PM Tom Stellard > wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I am orphaning the llvm and clang compatibility packages for versions > 5.0 and 6.0. > >>> We are about to push LLVM 8.0 into rawhide, so I will no longer > maintain these > >>> older versions. There are still a few users of these packages, so the > package > >>> owners can either rebuild their packages for LLVM 7/8 or take over > ownership > >>> of the compatibility package they need. > >>> > >>> -Tom > >>> ___ > >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > >>> List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >>> List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> ___ > >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > >> List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > >> > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning: llvm5.0, clang5.0, llvm6.0, clang6.0
On 01/28/2019 04:30 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 01/28/2019 02:47 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: >> It would be great if you would include list of dependent packages + >> their maintainers. >> > > Here is the list of dependent packages: > > Maintainers by package: > beignet ignatenkobrain Igor, What do you think about orphaning beignet too? There have been no updates to the project in over a year: https://github.com/intel/beignet/commits/master -Tom > ghdl sailer > ispc luya slaanesh > iwyu daveisfera > ldc bioinfornatics cicku kalev > rtagsgicmo > > Packages by maintainer: > bioinfornatics ldc > cicku ldc > daveisfera iwyu > gicmo rtags > ignatenkobrain beignet > kalev ldc > luya ispc > sailer ghdl > slaanesh ispc > > -Tom > >> You can use >> https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities/blob/master/f/find-package-maintainers >> for finding maintainers. >> >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 11:42 PM Tom Stellard wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am orphaning the llvm and clang compatibility packages for versions 5.0 >>> and 6.0. >>> We are about to push LLVM 8.0 into rawhide, so I will no longer maintain >>> these >>> older versions. There are still a few users of these packages, so the >>> package >>> owners can either rebuild their packages for LLVM 7/8 or take over ownership >>> of the compatibility package they need. >>> >>> -Tom >>> ___ >>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> List Archives: >>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670644] perl-Ouch-0.0501 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670644 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc30 |perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc30 |perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc28 |perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc28 ||perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc29 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
gcc-c++ and libatomic -- link issues
Hi, I maintain the hpx package and it uses std:atomic and when I install gcc-c++ it seems that libatomic is not a dependency of the gcc-c++ package. My program fails, because it can not link against libatomic. Is this the supposed behavior to install libatomic or should libatomic become one of the dependencies of gcc-c++? Best, Patrick signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670644] perl-Ouch-0.0501 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670644 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc30 |perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc30 ||perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc28 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-02-09 01:51:56 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Ouch-0.0501-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations
On Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 5:11 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/Kernel-clear/ updated copr link > Nice ! Having more kernel options for Fedora users is really cool Apart from that , what could give a good boost in numerical apps might be this https://clearlinux.org/blogs/transparent-use-library-packages-optimized-intel-architecture regards > On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:27 PM Manas Mangaonkar > wrote: >> >> Sorry for the really delayed reply. >> >> > Please take a look at my slides : >> > https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf >> > from last year OSSNA >> >> > There is a description of the main idea and how does it work here : >> >> > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Clear-Linux-NA2017-Opts >> >> Really nice and informative slides. >> >> > feel free to ping me for any further questons >> > Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the same approach >> >> I still don't get what exactly do you want me to implement, referring to the >> previous mails,super noob here. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:48 AM Victor Rodriguez wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Manas Mangaonkar >>> wrote: >>> >> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same >>> >> approach >>> > >>> > TBH I don't really know how that'd be done with the current package,would >>> > love to learn. >>> > >>> >>> Please take a look at my slides : >>> https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf >>> from last year OSSNA >>> >>> There is a description of the main idea and how does it work here : >>> >>> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Clear-Linux-NA2017-Opts >>> >>> feel free to ping me for any further questons >>> >>> regards >>> >>> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 3:09 AM Victor Rodriguez wrote: >>> >> >>> >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar >>> >> wrote: >>> >> > Thank you for the blog link victor , interesting read it is. >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the same approach >>> >> >>> >> > - Manas >>> >> > >>> >> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 23:03 Victor Rodriguez, >>> >> > wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Hayden Barnes >>> >> >> wrote: >>> >> >> > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a >>> >> >> > third-party dnf repo? >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > That would allow Fedora to keep it's general purpose kernel but then >>> >> >> > allow performance hounds to install the Clear Linux kernel. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > There is something similar already for people who want to use >>> >> >> > upstream >>> >> >> > vanilla kernel. >>> >> >> > >>> >> >> > The Clear Linux performance metrics posted by Phoronix are >>> >> >> > compelling. >>> >> >> > ___ >>> >> >> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Maybe a great blog to read about Clear Linux could be this: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> https://clearlinux.org/blogs/transparent-use-library-packages-optimized-intel-architecture >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Regards >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Victor >>> >> >> ___ >>> >> >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >>> >> >> List Guidelines: >>> >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> >> >> List Archives: >>> >> >> >>> >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > ___ >>> >> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >>> >> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> >> > List Archives: >>> >> > >>> >> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> > >>> >> ___ >>> >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >>> >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >>> >> List Archives: >>> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> > >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >>> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >>> >
Re: Intel's Clear Linux optimizations
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/pac23/Kernel-clear/ updated copr link On Sun, Oct 28, 2018 at 7:27 PM Manas Mangaonkar wrote: > Sorry for the really delayed reply. > > > Please take a look at my slides : > > https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf > > from last year OSSNA > > > There is a description of the main idea and how does it work here : > > > > https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Clear-Linux-NA2017-Opts > > Really nice and informative slides. > > > feel free to ping me for any further questons > > Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the same approach > > I still don't get what exactly do you want me to implement, referring to > the previous mails,super noob here. > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 14, 2018 at 12:48 AM Victor Rodriguez > wrote: > >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 12:15 AM, Manas Mangaonkar >> wrote: >> >> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the > > same >> approach >> > >> > TBH I don't really know how that'd be done with the current >> package,would >> > love to learn. >> > >> >> Please take a look at my slides : >> https://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/6b/Boosting_GLIBC_GCC.pdf >> from last year OSSNA >> >> There is a description of the main idea and how does it work here : >> >> >> https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item=Clear-Linux-NA2017-Opts >> >> feel free to ping me for any further questons >> >> regards >> >> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018, 3:09 AM Victor Rodriguez >> wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 12:40 PM, Manas Mangaonkar >> >> wrote: >> >> > Thank you for the blog link victor , interesting read it is. >> >> > >> >> >> >> Fedora is already in glibc 2.28 it is possible to do the same approach >> >> >> >> > - Manas >> >> > >> >> > On Sun, 26 Aug 2018, 23:03 Victor Rodriguez, >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 15, 2018 at 10:38 PM, Hayden Barnes < >> thbar...@icloud.com> >> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> > Would it be possible to mirror the Clear Linux kernel in copr or a >> >> >> > third-party dnf repo? >> >> >> > >> >> >> > That would allow Fedora to keep it's general purpose kernel but >> then >> >> >> > allow performance hounds to install the Clear Linux kernel. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > There is something similar already for people who want to use >> >> >> > upstream >> >> >> > vanilla kernel. >> >> >> > >> >> >> > The Clear Linux performance metrics posted by Phoronix are >> >> >> > compelling. >> >> >> > ___ >> >> >> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to >> devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> >> >> >> >> Maybe a great blog to read about Clear Linux could be this: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://clearlinux.org/blogs/transparent-use-library-packages-optimized-intel-architecture >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> >> >> >> >> Victor >> >> >> ___ >> >> >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> >> >> List Guidelines: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> >> >> List Archives: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > ___ >> >> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> >> > List Guidelines: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> >> > List Archives: >> >> > >> >> > >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> > >> >> ___ >> >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> >> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> >> List Guidelines: >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> >> List Archives: >> >> >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > >> > >> > ___ >> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html >> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> > List Archives: >> > >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> > >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
Re: signing status
On 2/8/19 11:11 AM, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > Looks like my build got caught up with this: > $ fedpkg build > Building freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30 for rawhide > Created task: 32666402 > Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32666402 ...snip... > And now I have a build without any tags. No, that all looks normal, the build was tagged into f30-pending as expected. So once the autosigner gets to it, it will be signed and moved to f30. So yeah, that is delayed due to the signing queue, but otherwise it looks ok to me. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1206959 kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lazarus 2.0 release - push to Rawhide or wait?
I've made a COPR repo with Lazarus 2.0. If you can test Hedgewars using it, that'd be great. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/suve/lazarus-2.0/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Lazarus 2.0 release - push to Rawhide or wait?
I've made a COPR repo so you can test if your packages build ok. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/suve/lazarus-2.0/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)
On Fri, 8 Feb 2019 at 14:31, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 12:21 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:21, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:01 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > > > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 07:34, Fabio Valentini > > > > > wrote: > > > librepo.LibrepoException: (8, 'Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: > > > Curl error (28): Timeout was reached for > > > https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f29=x86_64 > > > [Operation too slow. Less than 1000 bytes/sec transferred the last 30 > > > seconds]', 'An Curl handle error') > > > > > > That says the proxy it was trying to get to was too slow.. I will see > > > if I can find which one it was at that timezone and see if I can > > > address. > > > > > > > OK the problem does not look like it is mirrorlist related but > > something to do with the copr host/network at that time > > > > 209.132.184.33 - - [07/Feb/2019:00:01:59 +] "GET > > /metalink?repo=updates-released-f29=x86_64 HTTP/1.1" 200 18343 > > "-" "dnf/2.7.5" > > > > says it sent the data but it looks like something that the client was > > looking for timed out. I will work with the copr team to diagnose > > further. > > FWIW, openQA tests have been failing relatively frequently with > timeouts while refreshing repos or 503s from mirrormanager for the last > few weeks. I'm pretty sure this didn't used to be anything like as > common... I am checking if we are seeing an increase and when. There are generally some every hour when mirrormanager changes out pkls but sometimes it grows. -- Stephen J Smoogen. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: MBI (Playground 2.0)
On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 12:21 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:40, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 09:21, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 7, 2019 at 3:01 PM Stephen John Smoogen > > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 07:34, Fabio Valentini > > > > wrote: > > librepo.LibrepoException: (8, 'Cannot prepare internal mirrorlist: > > Curl error (28): Timeout was reached for > > https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=updates-released-f29=x86_64 > > [Operation too slow. Less than 1000 bytes/sec transferred the last 30 > > seconds]', 'An Curl handle error') > > > > That says the proxy it was trying to get to was too slow.. I will see > > if I can find which one it was at that timezone and see if I can > > address. > > > > OK the problem does not look like it is mirrorlist related but > something to do with the copr host/network at that time > > 209.132.184.33 - - [07/Feb/2019:00:01:59 +] "GET > /metalink?repo=updates-released-f29=x86_64 HTTP/1.1" 200 18343 > "-" "dnf/2.7.5" > > says it sent the data but it looks like something that the client was > looking for timed out. I will work with the copr team to diagnose > further. FWIW, openQA tests have been failing relatively frequently with timeouts while refreshing repos or 503s from mirrormanager for the last few weeks. I'm pretty sure this didn't used to be anything like as common... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: signing status
On pe, 08 helmi 2019, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just wanted to update everyone on our current status.
As you know from the other thread:
* The mass rebuild happened and finished.
* The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag
(to make sure everything was signed).
* In the middle of the night our autosign box stopped processing.
* The next morning this was noticed and a request for a replacement
motherboard was sent.
* Since that was going to take a day, we setup another machine to do
autosigning.
* That machine started processing the backlog, but also stopped
processing a few times (waiting on koji).
* Finally we set back up the normal listening process and I retagged all
the f30-pending builds to it would "see" they needed processing.
Currently it's processing along pretty fast, but it does make sure koji
has the signed rpms written out, which can take a few seconds on larger
packages.
I'm hopeful that it will catch back up today and we can go back to normal.
Looks like my build got caught up with this:
$ fedpkg build
Building freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30 for rawhide
Created task: 32666402
Task info: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32666402
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
32666402 build (rawhide,
/rpms/freeipa.git:4dd28889a240255e780926cb9d4b2aa2ef3d3432): free
32666402 build (rawhide,
/rpms/freeipa.git:4dd28889a240255e780926cb9d4b2aa2ef3d3432): free -> open
(buildvm-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
32666403 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/freeipa.git:4dd28889a240255e780926cb9d4b2aa2ef3d3432): open
(buildvm-s390x-06.s390.fedoraproject.org)
32666480 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, s390x): open
(buildvm-s390x-13.s390.fedoraproject.org)
32666478 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, aarch64): open
(buildvm-aarch64-19.arm.fedoraproject.org)
32666477 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, ppc64le): open
(buildvm-ppc64le-09.ppc.fedoraproject.org)
32666479 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, i686): open
(buildvm-31.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
32666481 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, armv7hl): open
(buildvm-armv7-24.arm.fedoraproject.org)
32666476 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, x86_64): open
(buildhw-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org)
32666403 buildSRPMFromSCM
(/rpms/freeipa.git:4dd28889a240255e780926cb9d4b2aa2ef3d3432): open
(buildvm-s390x-06.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 7 open 1 done 0 failed
32666479 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, i686): open
(buildvm-31.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 6 open 2 done 0 failed
32666480 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, s390x): open
(buildvm-s390x-13.s390.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 5 open 3 done 0 failed
32666476 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, x86_64): open
(buildhw-07.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 4 open 4 done 0 failed
32666477 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, ppc64le): open
(buildvm-ppc64le-09.ppc.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 3 open 5 done 0 failed
32666478 buildArch (freeipa-4.7.2-3.fc30.src.rpm, aarch64): open
(buildvm-aarch64-19.arm.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 2 open 6 done 0 failed
32666402 build (rawhide,
/rpms/freeipa.git:4dd28889a240255e780926cb9d4b2aa2ef3d3432): open
(buildvm-15.phx2.fedoraproject.org) -> closed
0 free 1 open 7 done 0 failed
32666898 tagBuild (noarch): closed
Could not execute build: ('Connection aborted.', RemoteDisconnected('Remote end
closed connection without response'))
And now I have a build without any tags.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Security / Identity Management Engineering
Red Hat Limited, Finland
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
signing status
Just wanted to update everyone on our current status. As you know from the other thread: * The mass rebuild happened and finished. * The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag (to make sure everything was signed). * In the middle of the night our autosign box stopped processing. * The next morning this was noticed and a request for a replacement motherboard was sent. * Since that was going to take a day, we setup another machine to do autosigning. * That machine started processing the backlog, but also stopped processing a few times (waiting on koji). * Finally we set back up the normal listening process and I retagged all the f30-pending builds to it would "see" they needed processing. Currently it's processing along pretty fast, but it does make sure koji has the signed rpms written out, which can take a few seconds on larger packages. I'm hopeful that it will catch back up today and we can go back to normal. There will likely be a short outage next week to move back to the now replaced hardware, but that should be only a few minutes. kevin signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1673051] Upgrade perl-Test-Kwalitee to 1.28
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673051 Bug 1673051 depends on bug 1672013, which changed state. Bug 1672013 Summary: perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse-1.00 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672013 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1672013] perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse-1.00 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672013 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse- ||1.00-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-02-08 16:25:50 --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Build done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32659020 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Games spin needs owner or will be dropped
The owner of the Games spin[1] has indicated[2] that he will not be able to maintain the Spin. If it is not adopted by Friday 15 February, I will request it be dropped from Fedora 30. If you would like to adopt this spin, please comment in the Pagure issue[3]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games_Spin [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-project-schedule/issue/99#comment-552078 [3] https://pagure.io/fedora-project-schedule/issue/99 -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Games spin needs owner or will be dropped
The owner of the Games spin[1] has indicated[2] that he will not be able to maintain the Spin. If it is not adopted by Friday 15 February, I will request it be dropped from Fedora 30. If you would like to adopt this spin, please comment in the Pagure issue[3]. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Games_Spin [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-project-schedule/issue/99#comment-552078 [3] https://pagure.io/fedora-project-schedule/issue/99 -- Ben Cotton Fedora Program Manager TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1632660] TLSv1.3 - enable post-handshake auth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632660 --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth --- Petr, go ahead. I was going to wait until upstream commented on the PR but that doesn't appear to be happening at the moment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
transtats.fedoraproject.org is live now!
Hi Everyone, Happy to announce that Transtats[1] (v0.1.6) is now deployed in production[2]. Please follow quick writeup[3] for getting started. Changelog is here: https://github.com/transtats/transtats/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md And contribution guide: https://github.com/transtats/transtats/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md Roadmap: http://docs.transtats.org/en/latest/roadmap.html Transtats can be accessed through CLI[4] also. (dnf install python3-transtats-cli) Just in case you have some feedback, kindly drop at http://feedback.transtats.xyz regards, sundeep [1] http://transtats.org/ http://docs.transtats.org/ [2] https://transtats.fedoraproject.org [3] http://sundeep.co.in/blog/2019/02/06/transtats-getting-started/ [4] https://github.com/transtats/transtats-cli ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1632660] TLSv1.3 - enable post-handshake auth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632660 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar --- Paul, if you don't mind, I will apply that patch. I have an intermittent test for that that I will include. (It uses openssl tool, once IO-Socket-SSL obtains server-side support for PHA the test will be rewritten without the openssl tool.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Orphaning pl (SWI Prolog)
On 2019-01-29, Petr Pisar wrote: > I have no interest in maintaining pl (SWI Prolog) package and thus I'm > going to orphan it. > Orphaned. -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1673724] perl-DateTime-Format-Strptime-1.76 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673724 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Format-Strpti ||me-1.76-1.fc30 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-02-08 12:09:01 --- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth --- Build done: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32650319 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1673655] perl-MongoDB-2.0.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673655 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-MongoDB-2.0.3-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0ea1d68bd7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1673655] perl-MongoDB-2.0.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673655 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-MongoDB-2.0.3-1.fc30 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- A bug-fix release suitable for Fedora ≥ 29. I also disabled tests in F30 because of mongodb-server bug #1673849. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
