Re: F29 System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking

[Igor Gnatenko]

In case if anybody is interested,

after mass rebuild we've dropped roughly 27709 dependencies on libraries in
RPM metadata which means that size of primary.xml has decreased by 1.3M
which would be something like 100K in gzip archive.. Which is not very
much, but it was never primary goal and still nice to see :) Although with
other changes, metadata size (in compressed format) went from 15M to 14M.

Unfortunately I don't have any way to test performance of all random
binaries we have in distribution, so I can't say how faster they started to
be.

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 10:23 AM Jan Kurik  wrote:

> Note from Change Wrangler: This Change Proposal requires mass rebuild.
> However, two weeks ago (June 19th), we have already passed the
> deadline for Change proposals requiring mass rebuild. I will leave the
> decision whether this Change proposal is accepted or not to RelEng and
> FESCo teams.
>
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Remove Excessive Linking =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveExcessiveLinking
>
>
> Owner(s):
>   * Igor Gnatenko 
>   * Neal Gompa 
>
>
> Pass "--as-needed" flag the linker through default system-wide LDFLAGS.
>
>
> == Detailed description ==
> The flag ("--as-needed") tells the linker to link in the produced
> binary only the libraries containing symbols actually used by the
> binary itself. This binary can be either a final executale or another
> library.
> The use of the "--as-needed" flag allows the linker to avoid linking
> extra libraries in a binary. This not only improves startup times (as
> the loader does not have to load all the libraries for every step) but
> might avoid the full initialization of big frameworks.
>
>
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners:
> Add "-Wl,--as-needed" into RPM_LD_FLAGS (in redhat-rpm-config).
>
> * Other developers:
> Nothing should break, but immediate work-around would be to disable
> this flag (will be provided in redhat-rpm-config) and fix real issue
> later.
>
> * Release engineering:
> #7604 [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7604] (mass rebuild is desired
> after this change).
>
> ** List of deliverables:
> N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> * Policies and guidelines:
> Add information how to turn it off (TODO link to FPC ticket).
>
> * Trademark approval:
> N/A (not needed for this Change)
> --
> Jan Kuřík
> JBoss EAP Program Manager
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
> ___
> devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to
> devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TAKTZLIWNFMVA6FAMU4QCOPF4ZV54A6G/
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  65  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b7556983e8   
tomcat-7.0.92-1.el6
  61  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-a0ddb153b8   
game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el6
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-809dcc772f   
golang-1.11.5-1.el6


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing

twa-1.8.0-1.el6

Details about builds:



 twa-1.8.0-1.el6 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-fa12d122ea)
 Tiny web auditor with strong opinions

Update Information:

Update to latest upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Sun Feb 17 2019 Artur Iwicki  - 1.8.0-1
- Update to latest upstream release


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
 204  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-f9d6ff695a   
bibutils-6.6-1.el7 ghc-hs-bibutils-6.6.0.0-1.el7 pandoc-citeproc-0.3.0.1-4.el7
 187  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d   
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
  61  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b6fa6cebc3   
game-music-emu-0.6.2-1.el7
  58  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-b43fdd19c3   
vcftools-0.1.16-1.el7
  31  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-17b3c81533   
cacti-1.2.0-1.el7 cacti-spine-1.2.0-2.el7
  17  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bd6a1ae962   
pdns-recursor-4.1.9-1.el7
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-26a7022f9a   
golang-1.11.5-1.el7
   7  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-5f60a8861f   
kf5-kauth-5.52.0-2.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

hashcat-5.1.0-2.el7
python3-pytest-cov-2.5.1-2.el7
twa-1.8.0-1.el7

Details about builds:



 hashcat-5.1.0-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-acfe90a1eb)
 Advanced password recovery utility

Update Information:

Initial upload for EPEL7.




 python3-pytest-cov-2.5.1-2.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b8a1263122)
 Pytest plugin for coverage reporting

Update Information:

Build for python 3.6

ChangeLog:

* Thu Feb 14 2019 Scott K Logan  - 2.5.1-2
- Add Python 3.6 subpackage for EPEL 7
- Set LANG in tests to handle unicode documentation files




 twa-1.8.0-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d5ec0bf325)
 Tiny web auditor with strong opinions

Update Information:

Update to latest upstream release

ChangeLog:

* Sun Feb 17 2019 Artur Iwicki  - 1.8.0-1
- Update to latest upstream release


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Proposal: Abandon v8 package

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

Hi,

Sorry for resurrecting a long-dead thread, but a few things happened recently:
1. v8 was just retired last week or so,
2. R-V8 just ported itself from v8-314 to v8 LTS 6/7.

Currently, R-V8 supports both v8-314 and v8, but as the latter fixes several 
downstream package issues, it is the recommended build target. I expect that 
eventually they will stop supporting 314 as well. This leaves me in a bit of a 
pickle as it does not bundle v8 and neither I nor upstream have any plans to 
build it ourselves.

> For all of these same reasons, the Node.js SIG opted to carry a bundled
> copy of v8 in that package as well. I think we should move to have v8
> considered to be a copylib for all reasonable purposes within Fedora.

In Debian, the nodejs package provides a stable *shared* v8 library, and the 
recommended install is against libnode-dev. Unfortunately, in Fedora, while 
nodejs-devel provides v8.h, it does *not* provide any shared library.

Is this something we can also do in Fedora, i.e., split out a nodejs-libs 
subpackage, or similar?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1672013] perl-Module-CPANTS-Analyse-1.00 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672013
Bug 1672013 depends on bug 1672313, which changed state.

Bug 1672313 Summary: Review Request: perl-Perl-PrereqScanner-NotQuiteLite - A 
tool to scan your Perl code for its prerequisites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672313

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[HEADS UP] Readline 8.0

[Igor Gnatenko]

We have just merged side tag (f30-readline8) into the f30 which includes
readline 8 + packages which needed rebuild against new readline (due to
SONAME bump).

Whatever was failing before and fails now… It just failed.
Whatever was not failing before and fails now… Fails not due to readline
update.

* foma (looks like some underlinking issue)
BUILDSTDERR: /usr/bin/ld: lex.yy.o: in function `my_yyparse':
BUILDSTDERR:
/builddir/build/BUILD/foma-0fa48dbacfe39509577ae6741054be7c05a19aac/foma/regex.l:130:
undefined reference to `yyparse'
BUILDSTDERR: collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
* folks (no idea what it tests and why it fails)
dbus-daemon[15619]: [session uid=1000 pid=15619] The maximum number of
pending replies for ":1.0" (uid=1000 pid=15596
comm="/builddir/build/BUILD/folks-0.11.4/tests/telepathy"
label="system_u:system_r:unconfined_service_t:s0") has been reached
(max_replies_per_connection=128)
* python34 (some change in pip/openssl?)
BUILDSTDERR: test_with_pip (test.test_venv.EnsurePipTest) ... Warning --
sys.path was modified by test_site
BUILDSTDERR: Got an error:
BUILDSTDERR: [SSL: TLSV1_ALERT_UNKNOWN_CA] tlsv1 alert unknown ca
(_ssl.c:600)
BUILDSTDERR: Got an error:
BUILDSTDERR: [SSL: TLSV1_ALERT_UNKNOWN_CA] tlsv1 alert unknown ca
(_ssl.c:600)
BUILDSTDERR: test test_venv failed
FAIL
=
FAIL: test_with_pip (test.test_venv.EnsurePipTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/Python-3.4.9/Lib/test/test_venv.py", line
390, in test_with_pip
self.assertEqual(err, "")
AssertionError: "DEPRECATION: Python 3.4 support has been[147 chars]).\n"
!= ''
- DEPRECATION: Python 3.4 support has been deprecated. pip 19.1 will be the
last one supporting it. Please upgrade your Python as Python 3.4 won't be
maintained after March 2019 (cf PEP 429).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Review request/swap for cros-guest-tools

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On dimanche 17 février 2019 17:01:27 CET Jason Montleon wrote:
> Hi,
> I packaged the integration tools for running Fedora 29 as a guest on Chrome
> OS under crostini.
> 
> Most of the binaries and other files are bind mounted into the container so
> the rest of what is set up (and included in the packages) are just links,
> configs, and systemd unit files.
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677079
> 
> I do have other packages but haven't done any reviews before. If it is an
> option despite that I am happy to do a review in exchange.
> 
> Thanks!

The review is done and approved.

Best regards,

Robert-André

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Readline 8.0 rebase in progress

[Igor Gnatenko]

On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 11:32 PM Jerry James  wrote:

> Was the apparently in-progress readline 8.0 rebase announced
> somewhere?  All I can recall seeing is [1], which said, 3.5 weeks ago,
> that the rebase would happen "in a couple of weeks".  But apparently
> there is a side tag and builds are in progress.
>

That is the beauty of side tags. It doesn't break anything and allows
people to work on rebases without disturbing others.


> I would have appreciated a heads-up on this.  I chose this weekend,
> when I get an extra day off of work, to do the big gap 4.10.0 and
> sagemath 8.6 updates.  But in between the bootstrap build of gap
> 4.10.0 and the final build of it, a readline rebuild, into the side
> tag, happened.  Now what am I supposed to do?  Build the entire gap
> and sagemath stacks into the side tag?  When is the side tag going to
> be merged back in?  Some communication on this subject prior to
> starting the builds would have been really helpful.
>

You can build everything as you do, when merging of readline tag will
happen -- it won't override your builds ;)

And then I'll rebuild sagemath / gap / whatsoever.


> References:
> [1]
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/52STB42A2SAMZZUBHYSRW5K4TKP5WYS2/
> --
> Jerry James
> http://www.jamezone.org/
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Readline 8.0 rebase in progress

[Jerry James]

Was the apparently in-progress readline 8.0 rebase announced
somewhere?  All I can recall seeing is [1], which said, 3.5 weeks ago,
that the rebase would happen "in a couple of weeks".  But apparently
there is a side tag and builds are in progress.

I would have appreciated a heads-up on this.  I chose this weekend,
when I get an extra day off of work, to do the big gap 4.10.0 and
sagemath 8.6 updates.  But in between the bootstrap build of gap
4.10.0 and the final build of it, a readline rebuild, into the side
tag, happened.  Now what am I supposed to do?  Build the entire gap
and sagemath stacks into the side tag?  When is the side tag going to
be merged back in?  Some communication on this subject prior to
starting the builds would have been really helpful.

References:
[1] 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/52STB42A2SAMZZUBHYSRW5K4TKP5WYS2/
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[HEADS UP] Bash 5.0

[Igor Gnatenko]

Bash 5.0 is now in Rawhide/F30. Enjoy :)

P.S. Don't hesitate to report bugs if you find one (or two).
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora Rawhide-20190217.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Atomichost qcow2 x86_64
Atomichost raw-xz x86_64

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 47 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 21/143 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm), 1/24 (i386)

New failures (same test not failed in Rawhide-20190216.n.0):

ID: 353967  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353967
ID: 353993  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353993
ID: 354012  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354012

Old failures (same test failed in Rawhide-20190216.n.0):

ID: 353964  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353964
ID: 353965  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353965
ID: 353968  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353968
ID: 353969  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353969
ID: 353970  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353970
ID: 353971  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353971
ID: 353972  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353972
ID: 353987  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353987
ID: 353995  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353995
ID: 354008  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354008
ID: 354018  Test: arm Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354018
ID: 354033  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354033
ID: 354055  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354055
ID: 354081  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354081
ID: 354082  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354082
ID: 354083  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354083
ID: 354085  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354085
ID: 354100  Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354100
ID: 354103  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354103
ID: 354119  Test: i386 universal upgrade_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354119

Soft failed openQA tests: 9/143 (x86_64), 4/24 (i386)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Rawhide-20190216.n.0):

ID: 353954  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353954

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Rawhide-20190216.n.0):

ID: 353952  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353952
ID: 353953  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353953
ID: 353955  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353955
ID: 353979  Test: i386 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353979
ID: 353980  Test: i386 Server-dvd-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353980
ID: 353991  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353991
ID: 353998  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353998
ID: 353999  Test: x86_64 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/353999
ID: 354003  Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354003
ID: 354032  Test: x86_64 universal install_anaconda_text
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354032
ID: 354088  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354088
ID: 354105  Test: i386 universal upgrade_2_desktop_32bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/354105

Passed openQA tests: 113/143 (x86_64), 19/24 (i386)

New passes (same 

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190217.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190216.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190217.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:5
Dropped images:  2
Added packages:  7
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   102
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  284.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4.94 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   4.86 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   8.09 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Minimal raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-Minimal-Rawhide-20190217.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Games live i386
Path: Labs/i386/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-i386-Rawhide-20190217.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation raw-xz aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/images/Fedora-Workstation-Rawhide-20190217.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: Games live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Games-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20190217.n.0.iso
Image: Container_Base docker armhfp
Path: 
Container/armhfp/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20190217.n.0.armhfp.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker aarch64
Path: 
Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20190216.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz
Image: Server raw-xz aarch64
Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-Rawhide-20190216.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: R-askpass-1.1-1.fc30
Summary: Safe Password Entry for R, Git, and SSH
RPMs:R-askpass
Size:183.18 KiB

Package: cppzmq-4.3.0-2.fc30
Summary: Header-only C++ binding for libzmq
RPMs:cppzmq-devel
Size:128.96 KiB

Package: gap-pkg-primgrp-3.3.2-1.fc30
Summary: Primitive permutation groups library
RPMs:gap-pkg-primgrp gap-pkg-primgrp-doc
Size:13.77 MiB

Package: gap-pkg-transgrp-2.0.4-2.fc30
Summary: Transitive groups library
RPMs:gap-pkg-transgrp gap-pkg-transgrp-data gap-pkg-transgrp-data32 
gap-pkg-transgrp-doc
Size:264.35 MiB

Package: neuron-7.5-4.20181214git5687519.fc30
Summary: A flexible and powerful simulator of neurons and networks
RPMs:neuron neuron-devel neuron-doc
Size:5.70 MiB

Package: rust-chainerror-0.4.2-1.fc30
Summary: Make chaining errors easy
RPMs:rust-chainerror+default-devel rust-chainerror+display-cause-devel 
rust-chainerror+no-debug-cause-devel rust-chainerror+no-fileline-devel 
rust-chainerror-devel
Size:46.64 KiB

Package: rust-x11-2.18.1-1.fc30
Summary: X11 library bindings for Rust
RPMs:rust-x11+default-devel rust-x11+dox-devel rust-x11+dpms-devel 
rust-x11+glx-devel rust-x11+xcursor-devel rust-x11+xf86vmode-devel 
rust-x11+xft-devel rust-x11+xinerama-devel rust-x11+xinput-devel 
rust-x11+xlib-devel rust-x11+xlib_xcb-devel rust-x11+xmu-devel 
rust-x11+xrandr-devel rust-x11+xrecord-devel rust-x11+xrender-devel 
rust-x11+xss-devel rust-x11+xt-devel rust-x11+xtest-devel rust-x11+xtst-devel 
rust-x11-devel
Size:196.32 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: libgap-4.8.6-9.fc30
Summary: C library version of the GAP kernel
RPMs:libgap libgap-devel
Size:4.94 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CriticalMass-1.5-24.fc30
Old package:  CriticalMass-1.5-22.fc29
Summary:  SDL/OpenGL space shoot'em up game also known as critter
RPMs: CriticalMass
Size: 17.51 MiB
Size change:  -544.57 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jan 31 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.5-23
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sat Feb 16 2019 Hans de Goede  - 1.5-24
  - Fix FTBFS (rhbz#1674575)


Package:  GAPDoc-1.6.2-3.fc30
Old package:  GAPDoc-1.6.2-2.fc30
Summary:  GAP documentation tool
RPMs: GAPDoc GAPDoc-doc GAPDoc-latex
Added RPMs:   GAPDoc-doc
Size: 1.33 MiB
Size change:  -14.74 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Feb 01 2019 Jerry James  - 1.6.2-3
  - Rebuild for GAP 4.10.0
  - Change BRs and Rs due to recent TeXLive packaging changes
  - Create -doc subpackage


Package:  R-R.utils-2.8.0-1.fc30
Old package:  R-R.utils-2.7.0-2.fc30
Summary:  Various Programming Utilities
RPMs: R-R.utils
Size: 1.40 MiB
Size change:  7.91 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Feb 16 2019 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
2.8.0-1
  - Update to latest version


Package:  R-clipr-0.5.0-1.fc30
Old package:  R-clipr-0.4.1-4.fc30
Summary:  Read and Write from the System Clipboard
RPMs: R-clipr
Size: 49.66 KiB
Size change:  3.85 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Feb 15 2019 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
0.5.0-1
  - Update to latest version


Package:  R-colorspace-1.4.0-1.fc30
Old package:  R-colorspace-1.3.2-4.fc30
Summary:  A Toolbox for Manipulating and Assessing Colors and Palettes
RPMs: R-colorspace
Size: 14.10 MiB
Size change:  11.23 MiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Feb 15 2019 Elliott Sales de Andrade  - 
1.4.0-1
  - Update to latest version


Package:  R-curl-3.3-1.fc30
Old package:  R-curl-3.2-4.fc30
Summary:  A Modern and Flexible Web Client for R
RPMs: R-curl
Size: 2.29 MiB
Size change:  39.03 KiB
Changelog

Re: %py3_build should accept options

[Richard Shaw]

On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 11:28 AM Miro Hrončok  wrote:

> On 09. 02. 19 14:51, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 7:48 AM Igor Gnatenko <
> ignatenkobr...@fedoraproject.org
> > > wrote:
> >
> > You can do "%py3_build -- --some-cool-option".
> >
> >
> > I'll see about trying that.. I'm trying to build PySide2 but it's not
> passing
> > --verbose or -j12 to the cmake builds so it looks like it doesn't matter
> anyway.
>
> Try defining %py_setup_args.
>

I see that in the packaging guidelines now but it could be made more
prominent.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Review request/swap for cros-guest-tools

[Jason Montleon]

Hi,
I packaged the integration tools for running Fedora 29 as a guest on Chrome
OS under crostini.

Most of the binaries and other files are bind mounted into the container so
the rest of what is set up (and included in the packages) are just links,
configs, and systemd unit files.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677079

I do have other packages but haven't done any reviews before. If it is an
option despite that I am happy to do a review in exchange.

Thanks!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Rawhide 20190217.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

[rawhide]

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 30 Rawhide 20190217.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan

Notable package version changes:
lorax - 20190214.n.0: lorax-30.14-1.fc30.src, 20190217.n.0: 
lorax-30.15-1.fc30.src

Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
https://www.happyassassin.net/testcase_stats/30

You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
locations, and enter results on the Summary page:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190217.n.0_Summary

The individual test result pages are:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190217.n.0_Installation
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190217.n.0_Base
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190217.n.0_Server
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190217.n.0_Cloud
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190217.n.0_Desktop
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_30_Rawhide_20190217.n.0_Security_Lab

Thank you for testing!
-- 
Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: GCC 9 OpenMP issues

[Mattia Verga]

Il 2/16/19 9:55 PM, Sérgio Basto ha scritto:
>
> Just remove "default(none)" from "# pragma omp parallel default(none)
> shared(thr_nbr_act)" doesn't fix the build for you ?
>
>

Yes, thanks, upstream had replied and gave me a patch that removes 
"default(none)" from some places in the code.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1676716] perl-Class-Field-0.24 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1676716

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Class-Field-0.24-1.fc3
   ||0
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2019-02-17 14:33:11



--- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Built for rawhide:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1211598

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Orphaning: supybot-git, adobe-source-libraries and openerp

[Alec Leamas]

Dear list,

As heading says: I have  orphaned  the packages supybot-git,
adobe-source-libraries and openerp. This is overdue since long, I have
not maintained these packages properly.

Of course, they are all free to pick.

Cheers!

--alec
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

review request: vcglib

[J. Scheurich]

Hi,

I entered a review request for the vcglib library.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989

Despite it's name, this is not a real .a/.so library.
It is just a huge collection of C++ header files.

Unfortunatly i can not offer a official review swap, cause i am not in
the packager group.

A package, that requires this library is wdune

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1658153

which needs fedora sponsoring...

so long
MUFTI
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Downloading modularized packages from Koji

[Marcin Zajączkowski]

On 2019-02-17 03:30, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
> Marcin Zajączkowski wrote on 2019/02/17 6:55:
>> Hi,
>>
>> After some packages (such as Fish [1]) are released to Fedora modular
>> repository I would like to download them from Koji and play with them
>> (to provide feedback) not having to wait until a request to move to the
>> testing repository is accepted.
>>
>> Unfortunately there are no RPM packages for modular builds in Koji UI
>> [2].
>>
>> Q. Have can I download built RPM packages available only in Koji?
>>
>>
>> [1] -
>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-2818ffed6e
>> [2] - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1211219
>>
>> Marcin
>>
> 
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fish/3/2920190216163513.139e1eeb/files/module/modulemd.x86_64.txt
> 
> says:
>   artifacts:
>     rpms:
>     - fish-0:3.0.1-1.module_f29+2923+49f4083f.src
>     - fish-0:3.0.1-1.module_f29+2923+49f4083f.x86_64
>     - fish-debuginfo-0:3.0.1-1.module_f29+2923+49f4083f.x86_64
>     - fish-debugsource-0:3.0.1-1.module_f29+2923+49f4083f.x86_64
> 
> so you can download them from:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/fish/3.0.1/1.module_f29+2923+49f4083f/

Thanks. I wasn't able to find it (the repository name) in the
documentation. It's important also in a case of a rollback need to the
previous version.

Marcin

-- 
https://blog.solidsoft.info/ - Working code is not enough
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Orphan/retire gogoc

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

Hi,

> Hello,
> 
> gogoc is dead to the world upstream (the gogo6.com site is now a
> nutritional supplement pusher!), and without gogo6's servers, gogoc is
> fairly useless. It's still possible it could be used to TSP tunnel
> through one's own servers to get IPv6, but as far as I know, there
> aren't any more tunnel services out there that use it.
> 
> So, if someone would find it worthwhile to keep it around for their own
> tunnelling needs, feel free to pick it up. Otherwise, I'll retire it in
> two weeks.

I just noticed this in the F30 FTBFS list. It seems you might have forgotten to 
orphan it? I'd guess it can also be retired too.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Python packages with extras dependencies

[Igor Gnatenko]

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 9:36 PM Eli Young  wrote:

> > I'd still consider this on case by case basis instead of developing a
> general
> > solution, sometimes a simple Recommends works. Sometimes, it's more
> complicated.
>
> That's fair and makes a lot of sense. I do like the pattern mentioned by
> Igor as used for Rust packages of using + as a separator for the
> features/extras.
>

Just make sure before start using it to implement support into the RPM's
Python dependency generator.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org