Fedora-Cloud-33-20201221.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20201219.0):

ID: 744941  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744941
ID: 744948  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744948

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1909332] perl-DateTime-Format-W3CDTF-0.08 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909332

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2020-12-21 - 93% PASS

[vashirov]

https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/12/21/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.9-1.fc33.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Chromium built in rawhide does not render most strings

[Kevin Kofler via devel]

Neal Gompa wrote:
> QtWebEngine *is* Chromium, so it would make sense that it exhibits the
> same problem.

To be clear (and I know you know this, but your readers might not know), 
QtWebEngine (qt5-qtwebengine) and Chromium (chromium) are distinct packages 
(none of them depends on each other), each containing a slightly different 
copy of essentially the same source code (plus some higher-layer code that 
is entirely different: Qt wrapper libraries vs. a browser application). But 
since the source code is largely the same, things such as miscompilations by 
the compiler are likely to affect both the same way. And the symptoms in the 
2 screenshots definitely look identical.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1904632] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f42df408d7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f42df408d7

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1904632] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-21c5a72f56 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-21c5a72f56`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-21c5a72f56

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1906282] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2020-d07c62f65e has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2020-d07c62f65e`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-d07c62f65e

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1906282] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4749700a36 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4749700a36

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-2f9004588a   
chromium-87.0.4280.88-1.el7
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bc6881c4f5   
pngcheck-2.4.0-5.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dddcb59a9c   
phpldapadmin-1.2.5-1.el7
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-83291355d7   
openssl11-1.1.1g-2.el7
   3  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4a9fc09599   
openjpeg2-2.3.1-10.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

dhcpd-pools-3.1-1.el7
perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25-1.el7
perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.el7

Details about builds:



 dhcpd-pools-3.1-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f9218b104a)
 ISC dhcpd lease analysis and reporting

Update Information:

update to new upstream

ChangeLog:

* Sat Dec 19 2020 Chris Adams  - 3.1-1
- update to new upstream, use bundled gnulib
- include make build dependency
- add sample templates
* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 3.0-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild




 perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f42df408d7)
 Read and write files while keeping the original line-endings intact

Update Information:

1.252020-12-04  - fixed bug where platform_recsep() wasn't unlinking files
created with  _temp_filename() (closes #37)

ChangeLog:

* Sat Dec 19 2020 Denis Fateyev  - 1.25-1
- Update to 1.25 release
* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.24-15
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.24-14
- Perl 5.32 rebuild
* Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.24-13
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.24-12
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.24-11
- Perl 5.30 rebuild
* Sat Mar 30 2019 Denis Fateyev  - 1.24-10
- Dropped RELEASE tests
* Fri Feb  1 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.24-9
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.24-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jun 29 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.24-7
- Perl 5.28 rebuild
* Thu Feb  8 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.24-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
* Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.24-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun  6 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.24-4
- Perl 5.26 rebuild
* Sat Feb 11 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1.24-3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon May 16 2016 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.24-2
- Perl 5.24 rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1904632 - perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632




 perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4749700a36)
 Partial string matching using edit distances

Update Information:

0.29 2020-12-10   * Internal changes due to deprecation of used part of Perl API

ChangeLog:

* Sat Dec 19 2020 Denis Fateyev  - 0.29-1
- Update to 0.29 release
* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 0.28-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.28-7
- Perl 5.32 rebuild
* Tue Mar 17 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.28-6
- Add perl(FindBin) for tests
* Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 0.28-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 0.28-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri May 31 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.28-3
- Perl 5.30 rebuild
* Sat Feb  2 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 0.28-2
- Rebuilt for 

[Bug 1904632] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed709adfc2 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed709adfc2

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1906282] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dac81b46d0 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dac81b46d0

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  13  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-37ef75d1ce   
chromium-87.0.4280.88-1.el8
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-c82583d07e   
pngcheck-2.4.0-5.el8
   5  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-fe42686452   
mbedtls-2.16.9-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

dhcpd-pools-3.1-1.el8
icewm-2.0.0-1.el8
perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25-1.el8
perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.el8

Details about builds:



 dhcpd-pools-3.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-37e4458526)
 ISC dhcpd lease analysis and reporting

Update Information:

update to new upstream

ChangeLog:

* Sat Dec 19 2020 Chris Adams  - 3.1-1
- update to new upstream, use bundled gnulib
- include make build dependency
- add sample templates
* Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 3.0-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild




 icewm-2.0.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b8ff2cb2b6)
 Window manager designed for speed, usability, and consistency

Update Information:

Update to 2.0.0

ChangeLog:

* Sun Dec 20 2020 Artem Polishchuk  - 2.0.0-1
- build(update): 2.0.0




 perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-ed709adfc2)
 Read and write files while keeping the original line-endings intact

Update Information:

1.252020-12-04  - fixed bug where platform_recsep() wasn't unlinking files
created with  _temp_filename() (closes #37)

ChangeLog:

* Sat Dec 19 2020 Denis Fateyev  - 1.25-1
- Update to 1.25 release

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1904632 - perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632




 perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2020-dac81b46d0)
 Partial string matching using edit distances

Update Information:

0.29 2020-12-10   * Internal changes due to deprecation of used part of Perl API

ChangeLog:

* Sat Dec 19 2020 Denis Fateyev  - 0.29-1
- Update to 0.29 release
* Tue Jul 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 0.28-8
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild
* Tue Jun 23 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.28-7
- Perl 5.32 rebuild
* Tue Mar 17 2020 Jitka Plesnikova  - 0.28-6
- Add perl(FindBin) for tests
* Thu Jan 30 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 0.28-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #1906282 - perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

[clime]

On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 11:39, Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 12/20/20 1:38 AM, clime wrote:
> >> I view this proposal as a risk that the spec files will look a bit more
> >> weird, and the spec files maintenance will start diverging too much.
> >> Everything happening for an overestimated triviality as IMO
> >> the release/changelog is [1].
> > Well, even if this change is accepted, it doesn't mean people will use
> > the feature so if the feature is overkill or it is generally bad, it
> > will just die on its own.
>
> No. In fact, even if one maintainer keep using this (e.g. you), as a
> provenpackager I still need to be able to deal with that. So, while this is
> "opt-in only" for the individual packagers, it impacts all our provenackagers
> (and some of our downstreams as well).

In some cases, the effect of this change on the work of
ProvenPackagers will be positive. Manual release bumping (because of
soname-bump or a hotfix change) is easier because you can just call
`fedpkg tag` and write a message instead of manually messing with a
spec file. And in case a script is used, then it's exactly the same
amount of work (calling the script).

>
> As such, I think this is not worth it.
>
> --
> Miro Hrončok
> --
> Phone: +420777974800
> IRC: mhroncok
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1904632] perl-File-Edit-Portable-1.25 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1904632

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f42df408d7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f42df408d7


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Rawhide-20201219.n.1 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 19/180 (x86_64), 13/122 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201218.n.0):

ID: 744627  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744627
ID: 744657  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744657
ID: 744658  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744658
ID: 744685  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744685
ID: 744718  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744718
ID: 744759  Test: x86_64 universal support_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744759
ID: 744760  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744760
ID: 744762  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744762
ID: 744763  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_desktop_encrypted_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744763
ID: 744786  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744786
ID: 744787  Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744787
ID: 744804  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744804
ID: 744805  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744805
ID: 744820  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_desktop_64bit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744820
ID: 744845  Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744845
ID: 744857  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744857
ID: 744858  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744858
ID: 744874  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744874
ID: 744890  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744890
ID: 744891  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744891

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201218.n.0):

ID: 744603  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744603
ID: 744643  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744643
ID: 744652  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744652
ID: 744704  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744704
ID: 744751  Test: x86_64 universal install_serial_console
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744751
ID: 744806  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744806
ID: 744833  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744833
ID: 744844  Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744844
ID: 744860  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744860
ID: 744865  Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744865
ID: 744866  Test: aarch64 universal install_serial_console@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744866
ID: 744869  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744869

Soft failed openQA tests: 14/122 (aarch64), 18/180 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201218.n.0):

ID: 744684  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744684

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20201218.n.0):

ID: 744572  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744572
ID: 744573  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744573
ID: 744580  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: 

Fedora-IoT-34-20201220.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

Missing expected images:

Iot dvd aarch64
Iot dvd x86_64

Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 3/15 (aarch64)

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201219.0):

ID: 744911  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744911
ID: 744920  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744920
ID: 744925  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744925
ID: 744929  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744929

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201219.0):

ID: 744904  Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744904

Passed openQA tests: 12/15 (aarch64), 14/16 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-34-20201219.0):

ID: 744931  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744931
ID: 744934  Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744934
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1906282] perl-Text-Fuzzy-0.29 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1906282

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4749700a36 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-4749700a36


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Packaging a go application

[Robin Opletal]

Hi Robert,

Thanks for the awesome write-up! This will help a lot.

I am unsure how I managed to miss your reply.

Cheers!

On 12/9/20 8:20 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:


This gonna be tricky because of the Makefile we can't use because we 
do not support Go modules yet. And git.sr.ht is not a supported repo 
home.


First you should use go2rpm to get the basic structure of your SPEC:
go2rpm --stdout git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc -f 
https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc


Here's one modified to work with Drew's Makefile while keeping 
Fedora's flags for the binary compilation, and the handling git.sr.ht:


# Generated by go2rpm 1.3
%bcond_without check

# https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc
%global goipath git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc
%global forgeurl    https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/aerc
Version:    0.5.2
%global tag 0.5.2
# /!\ Prerelease to fix compilation with go-pgpmail
%global commit  b56a688589c946ff8224f3d9e2e73de2edbc39b4
%global repo    aerc
%global archivename %{repo}-%{commit}
%global archiveext  tar.gz
%global archiveurl %{forgeurl}/archive/%{commit}.%{archiveext}
%global topdir  %{repo}-%{commit}
%global extractdir  %{repo}-%{commit}
%global scm git

%gometa

%global common_description %{expand:
Aerc is an email client that runs in your terminal. It's highly
efficient and extensible, perfect for the discerning hacker.}

%global golicenses  LICENSE
%global godocs  doc README.md

Name:   aerc
Release:    1%{?dist}
Summary:    Email client for your terminal

License:    MIT
URL:    %{gourl}
Source0:    %{gosource}
# Disable building of aerc that we handle manually in the SPEC
Patch0: aerc-fix-makefile.patch

BuildRequires:  scdoc
BuildRequires:  golang(git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/getopt)
BuildRequires:  golang(git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/tcell)
BuildRequires:  golang(git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/tcell/views)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/brunnre8/go.notmuch)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/creack/pty)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/danwakefield/fnmatch)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/ddevault/go-libvterm)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-imap)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-imap-idle)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-imap-sortthread)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-imap/client)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-maildir)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-message)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-message/charset)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-message/mail)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-message/textproto)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-pgpmail)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-sasl)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/emersion/go-smtp)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/fsnotify/fsnotify)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/go-ini/ini)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/google/shlex)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/imdario/mergo)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/kyoh86/xdg)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/mattn/go-isatty)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/mattn/go-runewidth)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/miolini/datacounter)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/mitchellh/go-homedir)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/pkg/errors)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto/openpgp)
BuildRequires: golang(github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto/openpgp/errors)
BuildRequires: golang(github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto/openpgp/packet)
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/riywo/loginshell)
BuildRequires:  golang(golang.org/x/oauth2)
Requires:   notmuch

%if %{with check}
# Tests
BuildRequires:  golang(github.com/stretchr/testify/assert)
%endif

%description
%{common_description}

%prep
%goprep
%patch0 -p1
# From go.mod replace statements:
# replace golang.org/x/crypto => github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto 
v0.0.0-20200420072808-71bec3603bf3
# replace github.com/gdamore/tcell => git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/tcell 
v0.0.0-20190807054800-3fdb6bc01a50
# replace github.com/zenhack/go.notmuch => 
github.com/brunnre8/go.notmuch v0.0.0-20201126061756-caa2daf7093c
sed -i "s|golang.org/x/crypto|github.com/ProtonMail/go-crypto|" $(find 
. -name "*.go" -type f)
sed -i "s|github.com/gdamore/tcell|git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/tcell|" $(find 
. -name "*.go" -type f)
sed -i 
"s|github.com/zenhack/go.notmuch|github.com/brunnre8/go.notmuch|" 
$(find . -name "*.go" -type f)


%build
export GOFLAGS=-tags=notmuch
export LDFLAGS="-X main.Prefix=%{_prefix} \
    -X main.ShareDir=%{_datadir}/aerc \
    -X main.Version=%{version} "
%gobuild -o %{gobuilddir}/bin/aerc %{goipath}

%install
install -m 0755 -vd %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
install -m 0755 -vp %{gobuilddir}/bin/* %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/
export PREFIX=%{_prefix}
%make_install

%if %{with check}
%check
%gocheck
%endif

%files
%license LICENSE
%doc doc README.md
%{_bindir}/*

Re: gcc11/kconfig_compiler (was: weird build failure on i686)

[Jeff Law]

On 12/19/20 9:40 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>
>> While trying to build a new kde-partitionmanager release, I get a strange
>> build failure which seems related to character encoding:
>>
>> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/8985/57428985/build.log
>>
>> /builddir/build/BUILD/partitionmanager-20.12.0/i686-redhat-linux-
> gnu/src/config.cpp:48:1:
>> error: extended character   is not valid in an identifier
>>48 | 挀漀渀猀琀 挀栀愀爀⨀ 挀漀渀猀琀 Config::EnumFileSystem::enumToString[] = {
>>"Unknown", "Extended", "Ext2", "Ext3", "Ext4", "LinuxSwap", "Fat16",
>>"Fat32", "Ntfs", "ReiserFS", "Reiser4", "Xfs", "Jfs", "Hfs", "HfsPlus",
>>"Ufs", "Unformatted", "Btrfs", "Hpfs", "Luks", "Ocfs2", "Zfs", "Exfat",
>>"Nilfs2", "Lvm2_PV", "F2fs", "Udf", "Iso9660", "Luks2", "Fat12",
>>"LinuxRaidMember", "BitLocker", "Apfs", "Minix" };
>>   | ^
>> /builddir/build/BUILD/partitionmanager-20.12.0/i686-redhat-linux-
> gnu/src/config.cpp:48:1:
>> error: extended character ⨀ is not valid in an identifier
>> /builddir/build/BUILD/partitionmanager-20.12.0/i686-redhat-linux-
> gnu/src/config.cpp:48:1:
>> error: extended character   is not valid in an identifier
>> /builddir/build/BUILD/partitionmanager-20.12.0/i686-redhat-linux-
> gnu/src/config.cpp:48:1:
>> error: extended character   is not valid in an identifier
>>
>> This seems to happen only on i686 arch, so I don't think sources are
>> corrupted in some way. Also, there seems to be no relevant changes between
>> the latest built release and this one that could justify the failure:
>>
>> https://github.com/KDE/kpmcore/compare/v20.11.90...v20.12.0
>>
>> Any idea what's going on?
> Wierd issue with kconfig_compiler on i686 when built with gcc-11, see bug
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907799
I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be a gcc bug.  In fact,
I've got my eye on upstream gcc bug 98366.

While I'm on PTO for the next two weeks, I'll probably be checking-in on
a few things.  If there's a good way to test this I expect I'll have a
compiler with the 98366 fix handy today/tomorrow.

jeff
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20201219.n.1 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20201218.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20201219.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images:  3
Added packages:  2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   107
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  182.29 KiB
Size of dropped packages:7.94 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   10.66 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   27.73 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: KDE raw-xz aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-KDE-Rawhide-20201219.n.1.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-Rawhide-20201219.n.1.armhfp.raw.xz
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker x86_64
Path: 
Container/x86_64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20201219.n.1.x86_64.tar.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Container_Base docker x86_64
Path: 
Container/x86_64/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20201218.n.0.x86_64.tar.xz
Image: Cloud_Base vagrant-libvirt x86_64
Path: 
Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-Rawhide-20201218.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box
Image: Cloud_Base vagrant-virtualbox x86_64
Path: 
Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Vagrant-Rawhide-20201218.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: golang-github-hashicorp-consul-sdk-0.7.0-1.fc34
Summary: Solution to connect and configure applications across dynamic, 
distributed infrastructure
RPMs:golang-github-hashicorp-consul-sdk-devel
Size:97.55 KiB

Package: qatengine-0.6.3-1.fc34
Summary: Intel QuickAssist Technology (QAT) OpenSSL Engine
RPMs:qatengine
Size:84.74 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: golang-github-data-dog-godog-0.7.13-4.fc33
Summary: Official Cucumber BDD framework for Golang
RPMs:golang-github-data-dog-godog golang-github-data-dog-godog-devel
Size:7.94 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  HepMC3-3.2.3-1.fc34
Old package:  HepMC3-3.2.2-4.fc33
Summary:  C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
RPMs: HepMC3 HepMC3-devel HepMC3-doc HepMC3-interfaces-devel 
HepMC3-rootIO HepMC3-rootIO-devel HepMC3-search HepMC3-search-devel 
python3-HepMC3 python3-HepMC3-rootIO python3-HepMC3-search
Size: 53.30 MiB
Size change:  8.20 MiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Dec 19 2020 Mattias Ellert  - 3.2.3-1
  - Update to version 3.2.3
  - Use new cmake rpm macro also for EPEL
  - Fix compilation warnings
  - Fix build for multiple python versions (EPEL 7) - fix from upstream git


Package:  abseil-cpp-20200923.2-1.fc34
Old package:  abseil-cpp-20200225.2-2.fc33
Summary:  C++ Common Libraries
RPMs: abseil-cpp abseil-cpp-devel
Size: 5.74 MiB
Size change:  162.07 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
20200225.2-3
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

  * Fri Jul 31 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
20200225.2-4
  - Second attempt - Rebuilt for
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sat Dec 19 2020 Rich Mattes  - 20200923.2-1
  - Update to release 20200923.2
  - Rebuild to fix tagging in koji (rhbz#1885561)


Package:  awscli-1.18.200-1.fc34
Old package:  awscli-1.18.198-1.fc34
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 1.95 MiB
Size change:  42 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Dec 18 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.18.199-1
  - 1.18.199

  * Fri Dec 18 2020 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.18.200-1
  - 1.18.200


Package:  bloaty-1.1-6.fc34
Old package:  bloaty-1.1-5.fc34
Summary:  A size profiler for binaries
RPMs: bloaty
Size: 860.83 KiB
Size change:  -12.33 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat Dec 19 2020 Rich Mattes  - 1.1-6
  - Rebuild for abseil-cpp 20200923.2


Package:  bpytop-1.0.51-1.fc34
Old package:  bpytop-1.0.50-1.fc34
Summary:  Linux/OSX/FreeBSD resource monitor
RPMs: bpytop
Size: 66.96 KiB
Size change:  346 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Dec 19 2020 Artem Polishchuk  - 1.0.51-1
  - build(update): 1.0.51


Package:  clang-11.0.1-2.rc1.fc34
Old package:  clang-11.0.1-1.rc1.fc34
Summary:  A C language family front-end for LLVM
RPMs: clang clang-analyzer clang-devel clang-libs 
clang-resource-filesystem clang-tools-extra git-clang-format python3-clang
Size: 224.75 MiB
Size change:  14.13 MiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Dec 16 2020 Tom Stellard  - 11.0.1-2.rc1
  - Don't build with -flto


Package:  cldr-emoji-annotation-1:38-1.1.fc34
Old package:  cldr-emoji-annotation-1:38-1.fc34
Summary:  Emoji annotation files in CLDR
RPMs: cldr-emoji-annotation cldr-emoji-annotation-devel 
cldr-emoji-annotation-dtd
Size: 5.80 MiB
Size change:  73.22 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Dec 18 2020 Takao Fujiwara  - 1:38-1.1
  - Bump to release-38-1


Package:  cura-lulzbot-1:3.6.22-2.fc34
Old package:  cura-lulzbot-1:3.6.22-1.fc34
Summary:  3D printer control software
RPMs: cura-lulzbot
Size: 17.77 MiB
Size change:  -70.96 

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Route all Audio to PipeWire (System-Wide Change)

[Mauro Carvalho Chehab]

Em Mon, 14 Dec 2020 23:04:23 +
Gary Buhrmaster  escreveu:
> On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 9:49 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab
>  wrote:
>   
> > # dnf swap pulseaudio pipewire-pulseaudio --allowerasing
> 
> I needed to add --enablerepo=updates-testing
> 
> Also, you may need to (as yourself) perform a
> 
> $ systemctl --user enable pipewire pipewire-pulse  

There are still broken dependecies when using with Jack protocol:

# dnf install pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit --allowerasing 
--enablerepo=updates-testing
Last metadata expiration check: 0:14:07 ago on Sat Dec 19 19:33:38 2020.
Dependencies resolved.
==
 PackageArchitecture
   Version  Repository  
 Size
==
Installing:
 pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit x86_64  
   0.3.18-1.fc33updates-testing 
 12 k
Removing dependent packages:
 SDL_mixer  x86_64  
   1.2.12-21.fc33   @fedora 
201 k
 a2jmidid   x86_64  
   9-4.fc33 @fedora 
130 k
 amsynthx86_64  
   1.12.1-1.fc33@updates
328 k
 anki   noarch  
   2.1.15-3.fc33@fedora 
 12 M
 ardour6x86_64  
   6.3.0-1.fc33 @fedora 
 63 M
 ardour6-backend-alsa   x86_64  
   6.3.0-1.fc33 @fedora 
281 k
 ardour6-backend-dummy  x86_64  
   6.3.0-1.fc33 @fedora 
147 k
 ardour6-backend-jack   x86_64  
   6.3.0-1.fc33 @fedora 
184 k
 ardour6-backend-pulseaudio x86_64  
   6.3.0-1.fc33 @fedora 
110 k
 arpage x86_64  
   0.3.3-30.fc33@fedora 
455 k
 aubio  x86_64  
   0.4.9-7.fc33 @fedora 
452 k
 audacity   x86_64  
   2.3.3-7.fc33 @fedora 
 26 M
 avidemux   x86_64  
   2.7.6-3.fc33 @rpmfusion-free 
177  
 avidemux-libs  x86_64  
   2.7.6-3.fc33 @rpmfusion-free 
 14 M
 avidemux-qtx86_64  
   2.7.6-3.fc33 @rpmfusion-free 
4.3 M
 calf   x86_64  
   0.90.3-7.fc33@fedora 
 19 M
 denemo x86_64  
   2.4.0-2.fc33 @fedora 
 29 M
 dssi   x86_64  
   1.1.1-20.fc33@fedora 
134 k
 ffmpeg x86_64  
   4.3.1-11.fc33 

Orphaning python-pykafka

[Andy Mender]

Hello,

Recently, I picked the python-pykafka package, since it was orphaned.
Unfortunately, upon closer inspection I noticed it has been neglected quite
a bit.

During the build process, it would download several dependencies via "pip"
which were not listed as BuildRequires in the SPEC file. 3 of them are not
packaged for Fedora at all (python-xxhash, python-parametrized,
python-lz4tools), one of which is incorrectly listed in the upstream
requirements.txt file (python-parametrized exists, but the latest version
is 0.1, not 0.7 as the requirements.txt file wants).

To make matters worse, it seems like both the upstream and several of the
dependencies are dead/abandoned.

I'm orphaning the package, since it doesn't make sense to keep it.

Incidentally, there is https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-kafka,
which was retired, but the upstream is alive so I might pick this one up.

Cheers,
Andy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Stop Shipping Individual Nodejs Library Packages (Self-Contained)

[Miro Hrončok]

On 12/20/20 4:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:

Anyway, there would be some variation on what you have there, if that
is correct.  It would be more ...

dnf repoquery --qf="%{source_name}" -a | grep ^nodejs- | grep -v
^nodejs-packaging% | sort -u -o nodejs.sources
vi nodejs.sources # remove the non-noarch packages, any any others we need to
python3 find_unblocked_orphans.py --skip-orphans $(cat nodejs.sources)


Just curious: Do you have some example of non-noarch nodejs package? I struggled
to find one:


nodejs-bcrypt


Is already retired:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-bcrypt/c/2ba645fe82af5e39c16c2257adba33663cab3ee0?branch=master

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Stop Shipping Individual Nodejs Library Packages (Self-Contained)

[Peter Robinson]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 3:24 PM Miro Hrončok  wrote:
>
> On 12/18/20 3:28 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > We plan on only removing nodejs library leaves (packages that nothing
> > depends on for running or building).
>
> Thanks. That was not obvious from the proposal.
>
> > I've never ran that script looking for packages that nothing depends
> > on, and I'm not sure I'm looking at the output correctly.
> > Would I look at the "FTBFS (rawhide) (not depended on) (740):"
> > section?  Are those the leaves?
>
> Either leaves or only needed by other leaves. If you remove the entire group 
> at
> once, there *should* be no impact outside of that group (however, conditional
> requirements are not handled in a 100 % bulletproof way).
>
> > Anyway, there would be some variation on what you have there, if that
> > is correct.  It would be more ...
> >
> > dnf repoquery --qf="%{source_name}" -a | grep ^nodejs- | grep -v
> > ^nodejs-packaging% | sort -u -o nodejs.sources
> > vi nodejs.sources # remove the non-noarch packages, any any others we need 
> > to
> > python3 find_unblocked_orphans.py --skip-orphans $(cat nodejs.sources)
>
> Just curious: Do you have some example of non-noarch nodejs package? I 
> struggled
> to find one:

nodejs-bcrypt
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: gfx/2d/BlurNEON.cpp error when build IceCat on ARM

[Peter Robinson]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 2:53 PM Antonio T. sagitter
 wrote:
>
> Hi all.
>
> I can't compile IceCat on ARM-Rawhide branch (it's an issue related to
> GCC-11?) because of this error:
>
> 167:32.34
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/11/include/arm_neon.h: In
> function ‘poly64x1_t vcreate_p64(uint64_t)’:
> 167:32.34
> /usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/11/include/arm_neon.h:6534:22:
> error: ‘__builtin_neon_vcreatedi’ was not declared in this scope; did
> you mean ‘__builtin_neon_vextdi’?
> 167:32.34  6534 |   return (poly64x1_t)__builtin_neon_vcreatedi
> ((__builtin_neon_di) __a);
>
> I don't know if it's caused by a compiler flag (-mfpu=neon) conflicts.

Likely, you should be using the distro flags. We have have armv7
devices that don't support NEON so we don't compile with them by
default and applications should use run time detected fast paths for
devices that support NEON.

Peter
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Stop Shipping Individual Nodejs Library Packages (Self-Contained)

[Miro Hrončok]

On 12/18/20 3:28 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:

We plan on only removing nodejs library leaves (packages that nothing
depends on for running or building).


Thanks. That was not obvious from the proposal.


I've never ran that script looking for packages that nothing depends
on, and I'm not sure I'm looking at the output correctly.
Would I look at the "FTBFS (rawhide) (not depended on) (740):"
section?  Are those the leaves?


Either leaves or only needed by other leaves. If you remove the entire group at 
once, there *should* be no impact outside of that group (however, conditional 
requirements are not handled in a 100 % bulletproof way).



Anyway, there would be some variation on what you have there, if that
is correct.  It would be more ...

dnf repoquery --qf="%{source_name}" -a | grep ^nodejs- | grep -v
^nodejs-packaging% | sort -u -o nodejs.sources
vi nodejs.sources # remove the non-noarch packages, any any others we need to
python3 find_unblocked_orphans.py --skip-orphans $(cat nodejs.sources)


Just curious: Do you have some example of non-noarch nodejs package? I struggled 
to find one:


$ repoquery --repo=koji -a | grep nodejs | grep -v noarch
nodejs-1:14.15.1-1.fc34.x86_64
nodejs-devel-1:14.15.1-1.fc34.x86_64
nodejs-full-i18n-1:14.15.1-1.fc34.x86_64
nodejs-libs-1:14.15.1-1.fc34.x86_64

(All 4 are subpackages of nodejs itself.)

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pagure / src.fp.o page comments go "stale"

[Richard Shaw]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 8:13 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 9:11 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 7:50 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 8:47 AM Richard Shaw 
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I've noticed for a while now that if I leave one of the above pages
> open for an extended period of time that I can no longer submit comments. I
> just get the cursor circle of death and it just sits there indefinitely.
> >> >
> >> > I've resorted to copying my comments, refreshing the page, and then
> submitting again which always works, but the question is:
> >> >
> >> > Why is this necessary to begin with?
> >>
> >> There are only two cases where this happens:
> >>
> >> 1. You are expiring your login sessions aggressively locally (purging
> >> cookies, etc.)
> >> 2. The browser is disconnecting and killing the memory processes
> aggressively
> >>
> >> Neither of which are from Pagure's side. Do you have any extensions in
> >> your browser that could do either?
> >
> >
> > Not purging anything on a regular basis...
> >
> > It's Google Chrome and I only have 4 extensions installed (Wikibuy,
> Remote Desktop, Offline google docs, and gmail links for mailto:).
> >
>
> Is your system suffering from high memory pressure? Chrome disables
> processes aggressively in that circumstance, and failing that,
> earlyoom would do the same.
>

I wouldn't think that would be the problem but I do keep a lot of tabs
open. I had 16GB memory but recently upgraded to 32GB.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1909508] New: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20201220 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909508

Bug ID: 1909508
   Summary: perl-Module-CoreList-5.20201220 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Module-CoreList
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, spo...@gmail.com,
st...@silug.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 5.20201220
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20201120-1.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Module-CoreList/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3080/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1909507] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20201220 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909507

Bug ID: 1909507
   Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20201220 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 5.20201220
Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20201120-1.fc34
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/5881/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

gfx/2d/BlurNEON.cpp error when build IceCat on ARM

[Antonio T. sagitter]

Hi all.

I can't compile IceCat on ARM-Rawhide branch (it's an issue related to 
GCC-11?) because of this error:


167:32.34 
/usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/11/include/arm_neon.h: In 
function ‘poly64x1_t vcreate_p64(uint64_t)’:
167:32.34 
/usr/lib/gcc/armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnueabi/11/include/arm_neon.h:6534:22: 
error: ‘__builtin_neon_vcreatedi’ was not declared in this scope; did 
you mean ‘__builtin_neon_vextdi’?
167:32.34  6534 |   return (poly64x1_t)__builtin_neon_vcreatedi 
((__builtin_neon_di) __a);


I don't know if it's caused by a compiler flag (-mfpu=neon) conflicts.

Build log: 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/3471/57863471/build.log


--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/


OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: New maintainer for hwloc package

[Antonio T. sagitter]

Hi Jiri.

Add me as (co)maintainer.

On 19/12/20 13:38, Jiri Hladky wrote:

Hello,

I'm looking for a new maintainer of the hwloc package:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/hwloc 



If anyone is interested, please feel free to take ownership.

Thanks a lot!
Jirka


--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keys.gnupg.net/


OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pagure / src.fp.o page comments go "stale"

[Neal Gompa]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 9:11 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:
>
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 7:50 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 8:47 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:
>> >
>> > I've noticed for a while now that if I leave one of the above pages open 
>> > for an extended period of time that I can no longer submit comments. I 
>> > just get the cursor circle of death and it just sits there indefinitely.
>> >
>> > I've resorted to copying my comments, refreshing the page, and then 
>> > submitting again which always works, but the question is:
>> >
>> > Why is this necessary to begin with?
>>
>> There are only two cases where this happens:
>>
>> 1. You are expiring your login sessions aggressively locally (purging
>> cookies, etc.)
>> 2. The browser is disconnecting and killing the memory processes aggressively
>>
>> Neither of which are from Pagure's side. Do you have any extensions in
>> your browser that could do either?
>
>
> Not purging anything on a regular basis...
>
> It's Google Chrome and I only have 4 extensions installed (Wikibuy, Remote 
> Desktop, Offline google docs, and gmail links for mailto:).
>

Is your system suffering from high memory pressure? Chrome disables
processes aggressively in that circumstance, and failing that,
earlyoom would do the same.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pagure / src.fp.o page comments go "stale"

[Richard Shaw]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 7:50 AM Neal Gompa  wrote:

> On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 8:47 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:
> >
> > I've noticed for a while now that if I leave one of the above pages open
> for an extended period of time that I can no longer submit comments. I just
> get the cursor circle of death and it just sits there indefinitely.
> >
> > I've resorted to copying my comments, refreshing the page, and then
> submitting again which always works, but the question is:
> >
> > Why is this necessary to begin with?
>
> There are only two cases where this happens:
>
> 1. You are expiring your login sessions aggressively locally (purging
> cookies, etc.)
> 2. The browser is disconnecting and killing the memory processes
> aggressively
>
> Neither of which are from Pagure's side. Do you have any extensions in
> your browser that could do either?
>

Not purging anything on a regular basis...

It's Google Chrome and I only have 4 extensions installed (Wikibuy, Remote
Desktop, Offline google docs, and gmail links for mailto:).

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Pagure / src.fp.o page comments go "stale"

[Neal Gompa]

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 8:47 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:
>
> I've noticed for a while now that if I leave one of the above pages open for 
> an extended period of time that I can no longer submit comments. I just get 
> the cursor circle of death and it just sits there indefinitely.
>
> I've resorted to copying my comments, refreshing the page, and then 
> submitting again which always works, but the question is:
>
> Why is this necessary to begin with?

There are only two cases where this happens:

1. You are expiring your login sessions aggressively locally (purging
cookies, etc.)
2. The browser is disconnecting and killing the memory processes aggressively

Neither of which are from Pagure's side. Do you have any extensions in
your browser that could do either?



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Pagure / src.fp.o page comments go "stale"

[Richard Shaw]

I've noticed for a while now that if I leave one of the above pages open
for an extended period of time that I can no longer submit comments. I just
get the cursor circle of death and it just sits there indefinitely.

I've resorted to copying my comments, refreshing the page, and then
submitting again which always works, but the question is:

Why is this necessary to begin with?

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1909492] New: perl-Config-Perl-V-0.33 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1909492

Bug ID: 1909492
   Summary: perl-Config-Perl-V-0.33 is available
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Config-Perl-V
  Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
  Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
  Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jples...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest upstream release: 0.33
Current version/release in rawhide: 0.32-458.fc33
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Config-Perl-V/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/6976/


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 34 Change: Enable spec file preprocessing (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Miro Hrončok]

On 12/20/20 1:38 AM, clime wrote:

I view this proposal as a risk that the spec files will look a bit more
weird, and the spec files maintenance will start diverging too much.
Everything happening for an overestimated triviality as IMO
the release/changelog is [1].

Well, even if this change is accepted, it doesn't mean people will use
the feature so if the feature is overkill or it is generally bad, it
will just die on its own.


No. In fact, even if one maintainer keep using this (e.g. you), as a 
provenpackager I still need to be able to deal with that. So, while this is 
"opt-in only" for the individual packagers, it impacts all our provenackagers 
(and some of our downstreams as well).


As such, I think this is not worth it.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Fedora-Cloud-32-20201220.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20201219.0):

ID: 744564  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744564
ID: 744571  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/744571

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org