date:20210120

Problem with s390x koji builder

2021-01-20 Thread Vascom

What's wrong with s390x koji builder?

I always see this error:

Child return code was: -11
EXCEPTION: [Error()]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
line 93, in trace
result = func(*args, **kw)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600,
in do_with_status
raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command,
output), child.returncode)
mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed:

Other arches are OK.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60085705

Need to fix it.

--
Best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Problem with s390x koji builder

2021-01-20 Thread Juan Orti Alcaine

I also got the same error:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60083125

El mié, 20 ene 2021 a las 9:35, Vascom () escribió:

> What's wrong with s390x koji builder?
>
> I always see this error:
>
> Child return code was: -11
> EXCEPTION: [Error()]
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/trace_decorator.py",
> line 93, in trace
> result = func(*args, **kw)
>   File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/mockbuild/util.py", line 600,
> in do_with_status
> raise exception.Error("Command failed: \n # %s\n%s" % (command,
> output), child.returncode)
> mockbuild.exception.Error: Command failed:
>
> Other arches are OK.
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=60085705
>
> Need to fix it.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Vasiliy Glazov
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

merging packages - is fedora fedora guideline right?

2021-01-20 Thread Petr Stodulka


Hi guys,
I am confused about the official guidelines for merging of packages in Fedora.
From my POV, when I merge some packages and the functionality is preserved,
the Obsoletes and Provides should be set and kept for 2 release cycles.
So there is not problem with dependencies, etc. However, I've just realized
that regarding guidelines only Obsoletes should be set.

Was it changed and is it really correct? From that point, I already have
a reported broken deps for git-remote-hg because of the missing provides
after the merge of some packages - I will fix it, but I am curious whether
this is really expected. Can you guys put a light on that? Or the guideline
needs to be fixed?

Thank you!

[0] 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages

--
Petr Stodulka
OS & Application Modernization
IRC nicks: pstodulk, skytak
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: merging packages - is fedora fedora guideline right?

2021-01-20 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 03:48, Petr Stodulka  wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I am confused about the official guidelines for merging of packages in Fedora.
>  From my POV, when I merge some packages and the functionality is preserved,
> the Obsoletes and Provides should be set and kept for 2 release cycles.
> So there is not problem with dependencies, etc. However, I've just realized
> that regarding guidelines only Obsoletes should be set.
>

That link is not to the current Guidelines. The Guidelines section on
renames is here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages
and it says to add both, *unless* it is not a sufficiently compatible
replacement.

> Was it changed and is it really correct? From that point, I already have
> a reported broken deps for git-remote-hg because of the missing provides
> after the merge of some packages - I will fix it, but I am curious whether
> this is really expected. Can you guys put a light on that? Or the guideline
> needs to be fixed?
>
> Thank you!
>
> [0] 
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages
>
> --
> Petr Stodulka
> OS & Application Modernization
> IRC nicks: pstodulk, skytak
> Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

-- 
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: merging packages - is fedora fedora guideline right?

2021-01-20 Thread Petr Stodulka

Thank you Elliot! Now it's clear.

On 20. 01. 21 10:02, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 at 03:48, Petr Stodulka wrote:

Hi guys,
I am confused about the official guidelines for merging of packages in Fedora.
From my POV, when I merge some packages and the functionality is preserved,
the Obsoletes and Provides should be set and kept for 2 release cycles.
So there is not problem with dependencies, etc. However, I've just realized
that regarding guidelines only Obsoletes should be set.

That link is not to the current Guidelines. The Guidelines section on
renames is here:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages
and it says to add both, *unless* it is not a sufficiently compatible
replacement.

Was it changed and is it really correct? From that point, I already have
a reported broken deps for git-remote-hg because of the missing provides
after the merge of some packages - I will fix it, but I am curious whether
this is really expected. Can you guys put a light on that? Or the guideline
needs to be fixed?

Thank you!

[0]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrade_paths_%E2%80%94_renaming_or_splitting_packages

--
Petr Stodulka
OS & Application Modernization
IRC nicks: pstodulk, skytak
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.

--
Petr Stodulka
OS & Application Modernization
IRC nicks: pstodulk, skytak
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat Czech s.r.o.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

62 matches

Mail list logo