Fedora-Cloud-33-20210307.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210306.0): ID: 802328 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802328 ID: 802335 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802335 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936117] perl-PDL-2.028 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936117 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-PDL-2.027 is available |perl-PDL-2.028 is available --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 2.028 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.26.0-1.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDL/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3205/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-07 - 95% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/07/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210307gite9b4eb594.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1905190] biber FTBFS in Rawhide (F34): tests fail on different \field{sortinithash} values
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1905190 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Release Engineering --- Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 34. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report. Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-02-01). A week before the mass branching of Fedora 35 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 33 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-35/f-35-key-tasks.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Idea: Use the latest version of openjdk
Just saw java-latest-openjdk thanks. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Idea: Use the latest version of openjdk
On 3/6/21 5:55 PM, Reon Beon via devel wrote: What are the disavatages besides minecraft? Could someone retest with the latest openjdk with minecraft and see if that is still an issue? It has been about 7-8 years since that was an issue. Is there some context to this question? I have openjdk 15 installed on my system. Is there something newer? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Idea: Use the latest version of openjdk
What are the disavatages besides minecraft? Could someone retest with the latest openjdk with minecraft and see if that is still an issue? It has been about 7-8 years since that was an issue. Thoughts? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933843] Please add perl-Net-SMTPS to epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933843 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Like Petr, I encourage you to migrate to smtp+tls. That said, I'm aware we dont always choose what environment our code runs in . https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/32582 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933833] perl-Mojolicious-9.02 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933833 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-9.02-1.fc3 ||5 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2021-03-07 00:21:35 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1720039 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933914] perl-Data-Printer-1.000004 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933914 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Printer-1.04- ||1.fc35 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2021-03-07 00:19:47 --- Comment #3 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1720033 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34
Hi I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34. I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: gdal gdl grass libgeotiff librasterlite2 libspatialite mapnik mapserver merkaartor ncl osm2pgsql pcl postgis pyproj python-cartopy qgis qmapshack R-rgdal saga spatialite-gui vtk -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Request to include package: coreboot
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 07:13:07PM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > People that want more security, uefi if they have only bios supported, or > boot speed. Also no other distros have it packaged yet so also people that > want to work on a upstream version. But it doesn't run _in_ the distro, and is deeply tied to the hardware. What would be the advantage for the end user in having it packaged by the distribution? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Review request: mingw-librttopo
Hi I need mingw-librttopo to update mingw-libspatialite: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936125 It's a pretty trivial package. Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Request to include package: coreboot
People that want more security, uefi if they have only bios supported, or boot speed. Also no other distros have it packaged yet so also people that want to work on a upstream version. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936117] New: perl-PDL-2.027 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936117 Bug ID: 1936117 Summary: perl-PDL-2.027 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-PDL Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com, jakub.jedel...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, lkund...@v3.sk, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com, tjczep...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.027 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.26.0-1.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDL/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3205/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 01:21:15PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:04:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Maybe we could make this work with some filter list. Right now there's > > just *so* much noise. But a lot of it is repeatable. We want/need to keep > > the warnings for developers, but for users, we could just show unexpected > > stuff. > > Well also, we could resolve some of them. Like from here: > https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/systemd-sysv-generator-lacking-native-file/12752 > > > [4.767388] systemd-sysv-generator[1062]: SysV service > '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys' lacks a native systemd unit file. Automatically > generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a > native systemd unit file, in order to make it more safe and robust. > [4.767416] systemd-sysv-generator[1062]: SysV service > '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys-late' lacks a native systemd unit file. > Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package > to include a native systemd unit file, in order to make it more safe and > robust. I think AdamW had some initial work done for this years ago. (Or maybe it was only discussed?) Either way, this would be very nice for other reasons too, no just to silence the warning, but it's not a trivial endeavour. > [4.771792] zram_generator::generator[1064]: Creating dev-zram0.swap for > /dev/zram0 (4096MB) This one is already fixed by https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-08c87dbaa9, which is waiting for the beta freeze to end. > [3.109161] systemd[1]: /usr/lib/systemd/system/plymouth-start.service:15: > Unit configured to use KillMode=none. This is unsafe, as it disables > systemd's process lifecycle management for the service. Please update your > service to use a safer KillMode=, such as 'mixed' or 'control-group'. Support > for KillMode=none is deprecated and will eventually be removed. > [3.128105] systemd[1]: /usr/lib/systemd/system/alsa-restore.service:15: > Standard output type syslog is obsolete, automatically updating to journal. > Please update your unit file, and consider removing the setting altogether. > [3.139960] systemd[1]: /usr/lib/systemd/system/mcelog.service:8: Standard > output type syslog is obsolete, automatically updating to journal. Please > update your unit file, and consider removing the setting altogether. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 06:04:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Maybe we could make this work with some filter list. Right now there's > just *so* much noise. But a lot of it is repeatable. We want/need to keep > the warnings for developers, but for users, we could just show unexpected > stuff. Well also, we could resolve some of them. Like from here: https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/systemd-sysv-generator-lacking-native-file/12752 [4.767388] systemd-sysv-generator[1062]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys' lacks a native systemd unit file. Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a native systemd unit file, in order to make it more safe and robust. [4.767416] systemd-sysv-generator[1062]: SysV service '/etc/rc.d/init.d/livesys-late' lacks a native systemd unit file. Automatically generating a unit file for compatibility. Please update package to include a native systemd unit file, in order to make it more safe and robust. [4.771792] zram_generator::generator[1064]: Creating dev-zram0.swap for /dev/zram0 (4096MB) [3.109161] systemd[1]: /usr/lib/systemd/system/plymouth-start.service:15: Unit configured to use KillMode=none. This is unsafe, as it disables systemd's process lifecycle management for the service. Please update your service to use a safer KillMode=, such as 'mixed' or 'control-group'. Support for KillMode=none is deprecated and will eventually be removed. [3.128105] systemd[1]: /usr/lib/systemd/system/alsa-restore.service:15: Standard output type syslog is obsolete, automatically updating to journal. Please update your unit file, and consider removing the setting altogether. [3.139960] systemd[1]: /usr/lib/systemd/system/mcelog.service:8: Standard output type syslog is obsolete, automatically updating to journal. Please update your unit file, and consider removing the setting altogether. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 12:00:39PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:25:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Once we reach the noble goal of having 0 warnings during boot by default, > > we could just issue a notification whenever anything pops up. We do that > > for kernel oops already. > > Right??? It might be worthwhile sometime actually making that a release > focus. We had someone on Ask Fedora last night posting about basically every > warning message he got asking what was wrong and how to fix it, and I don't > _really_ feel great about "oh yeah, that's just noise... I mean, it's a real > problem, but not a big deal, the message isn't meant for you... just ignore > it" as the answer. Maybe we could make this work with some filter list. Right now there's just *so* much noise. But a lot of it is repeatable. We want/need to keep the warnings for developers, but for users, we could just show unexpected stuff. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:25:40PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Once we reach the noble goal of having 0 warnings during boot by default, > we could just issue a notification whenever anything pops up. We do that > for kernel oops already. Right??? It might be worthwhile sometime actually making that a release focus. We had someone on Ask Fedora last night posting about basically every warning message he got asking what was wrong and how to fix it, and I don't _really_ feel great about "oh yeah, that's just noise... I mean, it's a real problem, but not a big deal, the message isn't meant for you... just ignore it" as the answer. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Request to include package: coreboot
On Sat, Mar 06, 2021 at 02:24:01AM -, Reon Beon via devel wrote: > Should be fine but they suggest a git version. What is the expected use case for having it packaged? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Self introduction
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:52:22PM +0300, Alex Fails wrote: > Hello everyone, > My name is Alexey Gorgurov, and I would like to participate in the community > life. > I'm experienced mainly in C++, Qt, .net, python, etc., interested in Linux > and have some experience in open source contributing. > I like to help people with programming issues and like to spend some time in > the community and hope to be helpful for Fedora Project. Welcome Alexey! Are there any areas you're particularly interested in helping with? -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-34-20210306.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 4/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210305.0): ID: 802207 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802207 ID: 802216 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802216 ID: 802223 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802223 ID: 802226 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802226 ID: 802227 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802227 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210305.0): ID: 802199 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802199 ID: 802200 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802200 ID: 802201 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802201 ID: 802215 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802215 Passed openQA tests: 12/16 (x86_64), 10/15 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210306.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 10/126 (aarch64), 6/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210305.n.0): ID: 802006 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802006 ID: 802009 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802009 ID: 802051 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802051 ID: 802094 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802094 ID: 802122 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802122 ID: 802161 Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802161 ID: 802167 Test: aarch64 universal install_scsi_updates_img@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802167 ID: 802183 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802183 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210305.n.0): ID: 801938 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801938 ID: 801942 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801942 ID: 801998 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801998 ID: 802049 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802049 ID: 802065 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802065 ID: 802142 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802142 ID: 802176 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802176 ID: 802181 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802181 Soft failed openQA tests: 56/126 (aarch64), 89/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210305.n.0): ID: 802003 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802003 ID: 802004 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802004 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210305.n.0): ID: 801870 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801870 ID: 801871 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801871 ID: 801873 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801873 ID: 801876 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801876 ID: 801877 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801877 ID: 801878 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801878 ID: 801879 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801879 ID: 801880 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801880 ID: 801881 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801881 ID: 801882 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801882 ID: 801883 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801883 ID: 801884 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801884 ID: 801885 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801885 ID: 801886 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801886 ID: 801887 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801887 ID: 801889 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801889 ID: 801890 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801890 ID: 801891 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801891 ID: 801892 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801892 ID:
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210306.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210305.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210306.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 5 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 860.46 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -5.84 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: KDE raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-KDE-34-20210306.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz Image: KDE raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-KDE-34-20210306.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-34-20210305.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210305.n.0.s390x.raw.xz Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-34-20210305.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210305.n.0.s390x.qcow2 = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: anaconda-34.24.5-3.fc34 Old package: anaconda-34.24.5-2.fc34 Summary: Graphical system installer RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-install-img-deps anaconda-live anaconda-tui anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel Size: 22.33 MiB Size change: 3.84 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 02 2021 Martin Kolman - 34.24.5-3 - Choose the best locale more carefully (#1933384) (vponcova) Package: firefox-86.0-7.fc34 Old package: firefox-85.0-11.fc34 Summary: Mozilla Firefox Web browser RPMs: firefox firefox-testresults firefox-wayland firefox-x11 Size: 308.59 MiB Size change: -3.46 MiB Changelog: * Mon Feb 08 2021 Martin Stransky - 85.0.1-1 - Updated to 85.0.1 * Tue Feb 23 2021 Martin Stransky - 85.0.1-2 - Fixed some reftest run in Mock * Tue Feb 23 2021 Martin Stransky - 86.0-1 - Update to 86.0 - Disabled Wayland backend on KDE/Plasma * Fri Feb 26 2021 Martin Stransky - 86.0-2 - Built with system nss * Mon Mar 01 2021 Martin Stransky - 86.0-3 - Added icecat-78.7.1-fix_error_template_with_C_linkage.patch to build on F34+ * Mon Mar 01 2021 Martin Stransky - 86.0-4 - Enable Wayland backend only when Wayland display is set. * Mon Mar 01 2021 Martin Stransky - 86.0-6 - Run xpcshell tests sequential - Test fixes * Wed Mar 03 2021 Martin Stransky - 86.0-7 - Added fix for mozbz#1694670 Package: kernel-5.11.3-300.fc34 Old package: kernel-5.11.0-156.fc34 Summary: The Linux kernel RPMs: kernel kernel-core kernel-debug kernel-debug-core kernel-debug-devel kernel-debug-modules kernel-debug-modules-extra kernel-debug-modules-internal kernel-devel kernel-lpae kernel-lpae-core kernel-lpae-devel kernel-lpae-modules kernel-lpae-modules-extra kernel-lpae-modules-internal kernel-modules kernel-modules-extra kernel-modules-internal Size: 494.18 MiB Size change: -2.14 MiB Changelog: * Fri Feb 26 2021 Justin M. Forbes [5.11.1-2] - MARKER needs SUBLEVEL for stable, I need to think of a better longterm solution (Justin M. Forbes) - Config updates for 5.11.1 (Justin M. Forbes) - Set CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM as off for non debug kernels (Justin M. Forbes) - CONFIG_DEBUG_HIGHMEM should be debug only (Justin M. Forbes) - Added redhat/fedora-dist-git-test.sh for a quick and easy script to test changes (Justin M. Forbes) - Changes for building stable Fedora (Justin M. Forbes) - Clean up redhat/configs/pending-common/generic/CONFIG_USB_RTL8153_ECM as it messes with scripts (Justin M. Forbes) - Bluetooth: btusb: Some Qualcomm Bluetooth adapters stop working (Hui Wang) - process_configs.sh: fix find/xargs data flow (Ondrej Mosnacek) - Fedora config update (Justin M. Forbes) - fedora: minor arm sound config updates (Peter Robinson) - Fix trailing white space in redhat/configs/fedora/generic/CONFIG_SND_INTEL_BYT_PREFER_SOF (Justin M. Forbes) - Add a redhat/rebase-notes.txt file (Hans de Goede) - Turn on SND_INTEL_BYT_PREFER_SOF for Fedora (Hans de Goede) - ALSA: hda: intel-dsp-config: Add SND_INTEL_BYT_PREFER_SOF Kconfig option (Hans de Goede) [1924101] - CI: Drop MR ID from the name variable (Veronika Kabatova) - redhat: add DUP and kpatch certificates to system trusted keys for RHEL build (Herton R. Krzesinski) - The comments in CONFIG_USB_RTL8153_ECM actually turn off CONFIG_USB_RTL8152 (Justin M. Forbes) - Update CKI pipeline project (Veronika Kabatova) - Turn off additional KASAN options for Fedora (Justin M. Forbes) - Rename the master branch to rawhide for Fedora (Justin M. Forbes) - Makefile targets for packit integration (Ben Crocker) - Turn off KASAN for rawhide debug builds
[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Branched 20210306.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Branched 20210306.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: anaconda - 20210302.n.1: anaconda-34.24.5-2.fc34.src, 20210306.n.0: anaconda-34.24.5-3.fc34.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/34 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210306.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210306.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210306.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210306.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210306.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210306.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210306.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210306.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 5/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210305.0): ID: 801858 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801858 ID: 801866 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801866 ID: 801867 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801867 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210305.0): ID: 801847 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801847 ID: 801856 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801856 ID: 801863 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801863 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210305.0): ID: 801839 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801839 ID: 801840 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801840 ID: 801841 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801841 ID: 801855 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801855 Passed openQA tests: 12/16 (x86_64), 9/15 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210305.0): ID: 801853 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801853 ID: 801868 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801868 Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used mem changed from 175 MiB to 193 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/800804#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801839#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: Used mem changed from 174 MiB to 193 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/800805#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801840#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: Used mem changed from 184 MiB to 207 MiB System load changed from 0.04 to 0.21 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/800820#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801855#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Fri, 2021-03-05 at 18:28 +, Tom Seewald wrote:
> > Could you modify fprintd.service, to set G_MESSAGES_DEBUG=all[1]
> > and
> > then grab a log of that?
>
> Here's what I see from systemctl status fprintd.service:
>
> Getting authorization to perform Polkit action
> net.reactivated.fprint.device.verify
> Authorization granted to AuthenTec AES2550/AES2810 to call method
> 'ListEnrolledFingers' for device :1.72!
> file_storage_discover_prints() for user 'tom' in
> '/var/lib/fprint/tom/aes2550/0'
> scan_dev_storedir(): opendir("/var/lib/fprint/tom/aes2550/0") failed:
> Error opening directory “/var/lib/fprint/tom/aes2550/0”: No such file
> or directory
> Requesting device 'AuthenTec AES2550/AES2810' authorization for
> method ListEnrolledFingers from :1.74
> Getting authorization to perform Polkit action
> net.reactivated.fprint.device.setusername
> Getting authorization to perform Polkit action
> net.reactivated.fprint.device.verify
> Authorization granted to AuthenTec AES2550/AES2810 to call method
> 'ListEnrolledFingers' for device :1.74!
> file_storage_discover_prints() for user 'tom' in
> '/var/lib/fprint/tom/aes2550/0'
> scan_dev_storedir(): opendir("/var/lib/fprint/tom/aes2550/0") failed:
> Error opening directory “/var/lib/fprint/tom/aes2550/0”: No such file
> or directory
>
> It looks like "/var/lib/fprint/" is a completely empty directory on
> my system.
Yeah, that is expected if you have not enrolled any prints.
The log is exactly how I expected it. i.e. pam_fprintd asks whether
there are any prints enrolled for the user. This will return zero
(there are none) and pam_fprintd will return PAM_AUTHINFO_UNAVAIL.
So, from the perspective of PAM, everything seems correct to me. I
think I might need to try and reproduce this myself.
Benjamin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210306.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210305.0): ID: 801830 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801830 ID: 801837 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801837 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210305.n.1 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 11/187 (x86_64), 16/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210304.n.0): ID: 801455 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801455 ID: 801478 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801478 ID: 801537 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801537 ID: 801538 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801538 ID: 801539 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801539 ID: 801555 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801555 ID: 801603 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801603 ID: 801608 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801608 ID: 801616 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801616 ID: 801630 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801630 ID: 801639 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801639 ID: 801656 Test: x86_64 universal install_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801656 ID: 801693 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801693 ID: 801701 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801701 ID: 801705 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801705 ID: 801713 Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801713 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210304.n.0): ID: 801464 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801464 ID: 801536 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801536 ID: 801550 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801550 ID: 801574 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801574 ID: 801601 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801601 ID: 801617 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801617 ID: 801694 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801694 ID: 801729 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801729 ID: 801736 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801736 ID: 801746 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801746 ID: 801747 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801747 Soft failed openQA tests: 52/126 (aarch64), 76/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210304.n.0): ID: 801602 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801602 ID: 801604 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801604 ID: 801640 Test: x86_64 universal install_iscsi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801640 ID: 801718 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801718 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210304.n.0): ID: 801422 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801422 ID: 801423 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801423 ID: 801425 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801425 ID: 801430 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801430 ID: 801431 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi
