Fedora-Cloud-33-20210308.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210307.0): ID: 803053 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803053 ID: 803060 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803060 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 i18n Test Week 2021-03-09
Hey All, Fedora is a community-driven project which means a lot of our users use Fedora in multiple languages. The i18n Test day[0] is scheduled to test changes that are coming in F34 along with testing the regular GNOME apps in a multi-lingual environment. This test day will also benefit from testers, testing the same in Silverblue as well! [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-09_I18N_Test_Day -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1935378] perl-PDF-API2-2.039 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935378 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-70c4f053b6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-70c4f053b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1935378] perl-PDF-API2-2.039 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1935378 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-PDF-API2-2.039-1.fc35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-08 - 95% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/08/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210308gite9b4eb594.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1918130] perl-Gtk3-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-450fd7 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-450fd7` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-450fd7 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933843] Please add perl-Net-SMTPS to epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933843 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5fff87ca7a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5fff87ca7a See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1918130] perl-Gtk3-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1324fb461 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1324fb461 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1918130] perl-Gtk3-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8 has been pushed to the Fedora 32 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936227] perl-Mojolicious-9.03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936227 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Mojolicious-9.03-1.fc3 ||5 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Last Closed||2021-03-07 23:36:12 --- Comment #1 from Emmanuel Seyman --- Built for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1720268 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-34-20210307.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210306.0): ID: 803024 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803024 ID: 803033 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803033 ID: 803040 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803040 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210306.0): ID: 803016 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803016 ID: 803017 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803017 ID: 803018 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803018 ID: 803032 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803032 Passed openQA tests: 12/15 (aarch64), 12/16 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210306.0): ID: 803043 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803043 ID: 803044 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803044 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210307.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 43 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 16/187 (x86_64), 21/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210305.n.1): ID: 802707 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802707 ID: 802708 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802708 ID: 802710 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_database_server **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802710 ID: 802718 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_database_client **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802718 ID: 802719 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802719 ID: 802728 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802728 ID: 802773 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_terminal URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802773 ID: 802782 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802782 ID: 802783 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802783 ID: 802784 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802784 ID: 802796 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802796 ID: 802848 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802848 ID: 802980 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802980 ID: 802983 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802983 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210305.n.1): ID: 802713 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802713 ID: 802727 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802727 ID: 802748 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802748 ID: 802758 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802758 ID: 802759 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802759 ID: 802785 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802785 ID: 802786 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802786 ID: 802787 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802787 ID: 802788 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802788 ID: 802799 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802799 ID: 802823 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802823 ID: 802850 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802850 ID: 802852 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802852 ID: 802865 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802865 ID: 802866 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802866 ID: 802879 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802879 ID: 802888 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802888 ID: 802942 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802942 ID: 802943 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802943 ID: 802950 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802950 ID: 802954 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802954 ID: 802962 Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802962 ID: 802978 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802978
Fedora-34-20210307.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 27/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210306.n.0): ID: 802427 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802427 ID: 802438 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802438 ID: 802473 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802473 ID: 802487 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802487 ID: 802503 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802503 ID: 802513 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802513 ID: 802514 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802514 ID: 802515 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802515 ID: 802516 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802516 ID: 802517 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802517 ID: 802518 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802518 ID: 802519 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802519 ID: 802521 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802521 ID: 802522 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802522 ID: 802523 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802523 ID: 802524 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802524 ID: 802525 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802525 ID: 802526 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802526 ID: 802527 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802527 ID: 802528 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_background@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802528 ID: 802530 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802530 ID: 802532 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802532 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210306.n.0): ID: 802418 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802418 ID: 802422 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802422 ID: 802478 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802478 ID: 802529 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802529 ID: 802531 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802531 ID: 802545 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802545 ID: 802622 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802622 ID: 802641 Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802641 ID: 802656 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802656 ID: 802661 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802661 Soft failed openQA tests: 56/126 (aarch64), 91/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210306.n.0): ID: 802486 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802486 ID: 802574 Test: x86_64 universal install_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802574 ID: 802602 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802602 ID: 802647 Test: aarch64 universal install_scsi_updates_img@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802647 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210306.n.0): ID: 802350 Test:
[Bug 1936241] New: Compiled @INC in 5.32 No longer Includes Suitable Path For Custom System-Wide Modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936241 Bug ID: 1936241 Summary: Compiled @INC in 5.32 No longer Includes Suitable Path For Custom System-Wide Modules Product: Fedora Version: 33 Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl Severity: medium Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: cla...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com, iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, ka...@ucw.cz, mmasl...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, psab...@redhat.com, rhug...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com, spo...@gmail.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Description of problem: Removing /usr/local/share/perl5 for the version specific dir with 5.32 from the compiled @INC makes it difficult to maintain custom system wide modules apart from the standard rpm/CPAN locations when upgrading. As this is done during build, is it possible to get it added back in the next version? Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 5.32 How reproducible: perl -e 'print "@INC\n"' Steps to Reproduce: 1. Using CVS/SCM software to update a custom module, it goes to the expected old location no longer part of @INC and the changes are not seen. Actual results: See above Expected results: The path would remain and the changes seen Additional info: Yes, CVS/SCM can be changed but in this case the update came across on "Thu 25 Feb 2021 04:46:53 PM CST" during updates. The installer did relocate the existing custom modules to ./5.32 but the change was not noticed until an update to one of the custom modules took place -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[rpms/perl-PDF-API2] PR #1: Tests
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-PDF-API2` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-PDF-API2/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1933843] Please add perl-Net-SMTPS to epel8
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933843 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5fff87ca7a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-5fff87ca7a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210307.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 3/15 (aarch64), 1/16 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210306.0): ID: 803008 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803008 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210306.0): ID: 802993 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802993 ID: 803002 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803002 ID: 803009 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803009 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210306.0): ID: 802985 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802985 ID: 802986 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802986 ID: 802987 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802987 ID: 803001 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803001 Passed openQA tests: 11/15 (aarch64), 12/16 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210306.0): ID: 803004 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803004 ID: 803012 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803012 ID: 803013 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803013 Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: Used mem changed from 193 MiB to 172 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801840#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802986#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi: Used mem changed from 207 MiB to 184 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/801855#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/803001#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936227] New: perl-Mojolicious-9.03 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936227 Bug ID: 1936227 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-9.03 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: emman...@seyman.fr, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, robinlee.s...@gmail.com, yan...@declera.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 9.03 Current version/release in rawhide: 9.02-1.fc35 URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Mojolicious Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5966/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210307.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210305.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210307.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 7 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:3 Upgraded packages: 58 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 6.49 MiB Size of dropped packages:15.75 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.55 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 73.98 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Server boot ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-ppc64le-Rawhide-20210305.n.1.iso Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 ppc64le Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20210305.n.1.ppc64le.qcow2 Image: Everything boot ppc64le Path: Everything/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-ppc64le-Rawhide-20210305.n.1.iso Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20210305.n.1.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le Path: Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20210305.n.1.ppc64le.tar.xz Image: Server dvd ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-Rawhide-20210305.n.1.iso Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz ppc64le Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20210305.n.1.ppc64le.raw.xz = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-googlecloudplatform-guest-logging-0-1.20210205git6cbb518.fc35 Summary: Common logger used by GCP guest environment RPMs:golang-github-googlecloudplatform-guest-logging-devel Size:17.54 KiB Package: playonlinux-4.4-2.fc35 Summary: Graphical front-end for Wine RPMs:playonlinux Size:6.47 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: engrid-2.0.0-0.36.20170615git0563bcc.fc34 Summary: Mesh generation tool RPMs:engrid engrid-devel engrid-doc Size:13.09 MiB Package: php-pecl-propro-2.1.0-9.fc34 Summary: Property proxy RPMs:php-pecl-propro php-pecl-propro-devel Size:187.39 KiB Package: rubygem-fog-aws-3.8.0-2.fc34 Summary: Module for the 'fog' gem to support Amazon Web Services RPMs:rubygem-fog-aws rubygem-fog-aws-doc Size:2.47 MiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: FAudio-21.03.05-1.fc35 Old package: FAudio-21.03-1.fc35 Summary: FNA is a reimplementation of the Microsoft XNA Game Studio 4.0 Refresh libraries RPMs: libFAudio libFAudio-devel Size: 830.97 KiB Size change: 670 B Changelog: * Sat Mar 06 2021 Michael Cronenworth - 21.03.05-1 - Update to 21.03.05 Package: R-desc-1.3.0-1.fc35 Old package: R-desc-1.2.0-9.fc34 Summary: Manipulate DESCRIPTION Files RPMs: R-desc Size: 529.69 KiB Size change: 232.56 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 06 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.3.0-1 - Update to latest version (#1936004) - Rename check conditional to bootstrap Package: R-tidyr-1.1.3-1.fc35 Old package: R-tidyr-1.1.2-2.fc34 Summary: Tidy Messy Data RPMs: R-tidyr Size: 3.85 MiB Size change: 4.74 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 05 2021 Elliott Sales de Andrade - 1.1.3-1 - Update to latest version (#1934491) Package: Rex-1.13.3-1.fc35 Old package: Rex-1.13.2-2.fc34 Summary: The friendly automation framework on basis of Perl RPMs: Rex Size: 464.85 KiB Size change: -62 B Changelog: * Sat Mar 06 2021 Dominic Hopf - 1.13.3-1 - Update to 1.13.3 (#1936026) Package: ceph-2:16.1.0-0.5.snapshot.fc35 Old package: ceph-2:16.1.0-0.4.snapshot.fc35 Summary: User space components of the Ceph file system RPMs: ceph ceph-base ceph-common ceph-fuse ceph-grafana-dashboards ceph-immutable-object-cache ceph-mds ceph-mgr ceph-mgr-cephadm ceph-mgr-dashboard ceph-mgr-diskprediction-local ceph-mgr-k8sevents ceph-mgr-modules-core ceph-mgr-rook ceph-mon ceph-osd ceph-prometheus-alerts ceph-radosgw ceph-resource-agents ceph-selinux ceph-test cephadm cephfs-java cephfs-mirror cephfs-shell cephfs-top libcephfs-devel libcephfs2 libcephfs_jni-devel libcephfs_jni1 librados-devel librados2 libradospp-devel libradosstriper-devel libradosstriper1 librbd-devel librbd1 librgw-devel librgw2 python3-ceph-argparse python3-ceph-common python3-cephfs python3-rados python3-rbd python3-rgw rados-objclass-devel rbd-fuse rbd-mirror rbd-nbd Size: 423.46 MiB Size change: -12.34 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 05 2021 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY - 2:16.1.0-0.5.snapshot - ceph 16.1.0 RC (ceph-16.1.0-308-gabe639eb) - rpmbuild apparently unable to automatically derive 'Requires: rocksdb' from 'BuildRequires: rocksdb-devel' for librocksdb.so.6.13 Package: clojure-1:1.10.3-1.fc35 Old package: clojure-1:1.10.2-1.fc34 Summary: A dynamic programming language that targets the Java Virtual Machine RPMs: clojure Size: 3.32 MiB Size change: -12.39 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 06 2021 Markku Korkeala - 1:1.10.3-1 - Update to upstream release 1.10.3 Package: containerd-1.5.0
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210307.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210306.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210307.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-34-20210307.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210307.n.0.s390x.qcow2 Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210307.n.0.s390x.raw.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-34-20210307.n.0.s390x.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Server dvd ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-ppc64le-34-20210306.n.0.iso Image: Server boot ppc64le Path: Server/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-ppc64le-34-20210306.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
Dnia Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 12:55:21PM -0500, Matthew Miller napisał(a): > On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:26:50AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > > > It can, but most people don't have a good setup for even local mail > > > delivery. Out of the box, we don't really do anything useful. > > It wouldn't take much. Install Postfix, and when Anaconda creates the > > first user account, have it add a mapping from root to that username in > > /etc/aliases. Then a variety of MUAs can pick up the emails from > > /var/spool/mail. > > Well but even then the user needs to know to look for local mail. That's not > a normal expecation for even many Linux folks these days. > > I think for desktop we'd be better off looking for a notification solution > that doesn't need mail as a transport layer. I have vague recollection of GNOME popup warning me about disk problems discovered by SMART. I see /usr/libexec/gsd-disk-utility-notify running in my session, that was probably the source of the notification. -- Tomasz Torcz “God, root, what's the difference?” to...@pipebreaker.pl “God is more forgiving.” ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1936221] New: perl-libwww-perl-6.53 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936221 Bug ID: 1936221 Summary: perl-libwww-perl-6.53 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-libwww-perl Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: caillon+fedoraproj...@gmail.com, ka...@ucw.cz, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com, rhug...@redhat.com, rstr...@redhat.com, sandm...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 6.53 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.52-2.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/libwww-perl/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/3024/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] 2021-03-08 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2021-03-08 # Time: 16:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net Greetings testers! We didn't meet for a couple of weeks, so let's meet up tomorrow and check in on F34 progress and community events. If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this email and suggest them! Thanks. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous meeting follow-up 2. Fedora 34 status 3. Test Day / community event status 4. Open floor -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] 2021-03-08 @ 17:00 UTC - Fedora 34 Blocker Review Meeting
# F34 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2021-03-08 # Time: 17:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net Hi folks! We have 1 proposed Beta blocker, 8 proposed freeze exception issues, and 2 proposed Final blockers to review (as of now), so we'll have a Fedora 34 blocker review meeting tomorrow. If you have time today, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!** We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F34 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good day and see you tomorrow! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Doesn't composer depricate all the dush and drupal* + module packages?
*drush ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34
On 07/03/2021 17:53, Sandro Mani wrote: On 07.03.21 16:30, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Sandro Mani wrote: I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: gdal merkaartor FYI, your merkaartor build failed because merkaartor depends on gdal (it is used to import external reference data such as OGD in file formats that are not natively supported), so you need to rebuild gdal first and have the rebuilt gdal in the buildroot for merkaartor. Yep, I'll iterate the process as necessary until all dependencies resolve. I'm working on a fix for mapnik and will take care of that and it's dependencies once I've managed to backport the work-in-progress patch for the new API from upstream. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:26:50AM +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > > It can, but most people don't have a good setup for even local mail > > delivery. Out of the box, we don't really do anything useful. > It wouldn't take much. Install Postfix, and when Anaconda creates the > first user account, have it add a mapping from root to that username in > /etc/aliases. Then a variety of MUAs can pick up the emails from > /var/spool/mail. Well but even then the user needs to know to look for local mail. That's not a normal expecation for even many Linux folks these days. I think for desktop we'd be better off looking for a notification solution that doesn't need mail as a transport layer. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34
On 07.03.21 16:30, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Sandro Mani wrote: I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: gdal merkaartor FYI, your merkaartor build failed because merkaartor depends on gdal (it is used to import external reference data such as OGD in file formats that are not natively supported), so you need to rebuild gdal first and have the rebuilt gdal in the buildroot for merkaartor. Yep, I'll iterate the process as necessary until all dependencies resolve. Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Doesn't composer depricate all the dush and drupal* + module packages?
Thoughts? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1918130] perl-Gtk3-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1324fb461 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 8. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1324fb461 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1918130] perl-Gtk3-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5dac05f9c8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1918130] perl-Gtk3-0.038 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1918130 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-450fd7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-450fd7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:00:56AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > running commands to look back in the logs for problems is a common > > diagnostic step. This could be better, of course. > But for MCE exceptions, specifically ECC errors I would expect the kernel to > log these > through dmesg anyways and then the mcelog service has very little added value > IMHO > (I have no experience with machines with ECC RAM). I think it's actually needed to properly log the errors coming from the kernel. However, I see from the docs https://github.com/andikleen/mcelog that it has a "trigger" mode, where the kernel calls it on an error. Upstream doesn't recommend it because it doesn't enable some fancier features, but maybe that would be a better default for desktop > Esp. given that ECC RAM is something which most Fedora Workstation users won't > have, so having this included / enabled by default feels wrong IMHO. It's my understanding that it also handles other CPU errors and -- probably very relevant to many Fedora Workstation users -- thermal CPU throttling events. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34
Sandro Mani wrote: > I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: > > gdal > merkaartor FYI, your merkaartor build failed because merkaartor depends on gdal (it is used to import external reference data such as OGD in file formats that are not natively supported), so you need to rebuild gdal first and have the rebuilt gdal in the buildroot for merkaartor. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-71d1af6aca isync-1.4.1-1.el8 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fedb6fa69d python-aiohttp-3.7.4-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fc2f1ff74c x11vnc-0.9.16-3.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1073219045 privoxy-3.0.32-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a2e8a7475f chromium-88.0.4324.182-2.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-94317ce911 suricata-5.0.6-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6b1b1f9053 python-django-2.2.19-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-58f4d56777 zabbix40-4.0.29-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing ifstat-1.1-34.el8 nagios-4.4.6-4.el8 python-moksha-hub-1.5.17-10.el8 Details about builds: ifstat-1.1-34.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f270ded6e7) Interface statistics Update Information: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild ChangeLog: nagios-4.4.6-4.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e9c2beec98) Host/service/network monitoring program Update Information: Fix for CVE-2020-13977 BZ1849087 Add missing require for nagios-plugins-ping Update to 4.4.6 ChangeLog: * Wed Mar 3 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-4 - Add missing require for nagios-plugins-ping - Fix run path * Sat Feb 27 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-3 - Require plugins needed for localhost monitoring (#1932297) * Tue Feb 23 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-2 - Fix systemd unit file permissions #1676334 * Sat Feb 20 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-1 - Update to 4.4.6 - Fix for CVE-2020-13977 #BZ1849087 - Some spec cleanup * Tue Feb 18 2020 Stephen Smoogen - 4.4.5-3 - Add change to allow for problems found in mass rebuild and gcc10. - Fix BZ#1793909 * Wed Jan 29 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.4.5-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1666209 - Nagios cannot start after system reboot because of missing directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666209 [ 2 ] Bug #1829114 - nagios-4.4.6 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829114 [ 3 ] Bug #1849087 - CVE-2020-13977 nagios: URL injection (post-authentication) vulnerability [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849087 [ 4 ] Bug #1932297 - Nagios server rpm missing some nagios-plugins-* dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932297 python-moksha-hub-1.5.17-10.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-ddc7e63a10) Hub components for Moksha Update Information: Initial version for epel8 ChangeLog: References: [ 1 ] Bug #1815701 - Please branch and build python-moksha-hub for EPEL 8 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1815701 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9ec8ceb857 ansible-2.9.18-1.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-0859a9d61e x11vnc-0.9.13-12.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9fbe0750f7 privoxy-3.0.32-1.el7 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-580891d7f4 chromium-88.0.4324.182-2.el7 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f1e9ccd247 zabbix40-4.0.29-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing ifstat-1.1-34.el7 nagios-4.4.6-4.el7 Details about builds: ifstat-1.1-34.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-59a93a93dd) Interface statistics Update Information: Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild ChangeLog: nagios-4.4.6-4.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-04cc5bcb08) Host/service/network monitoring program Update Information: Fix for CVE-2020-13977 BZ1849087 Add missing require for nagios-plugins-ping Update to 4.4.6 ChangeLog: * Wed Mar 3 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-4 - Add missing require for nagios-plugins-ping - Fix run path * Sat Feb 27 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-3 - Require plugins needed for localhost monitoring (#1932297) * Tue Feb 23 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-2 - Fix systemd unit file permissions #1676334 * Sat Feb 20 2021 Guido Aulisi - 4.4.6-1 - Update to 4.4.6 - Fix for CVE-2020-13977 #BZ1849087 - Some spec cleanup References: [ 1 ] Bug #1666209 - Nagios cannot start after system reboot because of missing directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1666209 [ 2 ] Bug #1829114 - nagios-4.4.6 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1829114 [ 3 ] Bug #1849087 - CVE-2020-13977 nagios: URL injection (post-authentication) vulnerability [epel-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1849087 [ 4 ] Bug #1932297 - Nagios server rpm missing some nagios-plugins-* dependency https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1932297 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:28 am, Björn Persson wrote: Do the ECC-less Intel processors also lack all other MCE support? No, ABRT used to regularly warn me about thermal events from MCE when I didn't have a good enough CPU fan. That was an Intel machine. I fixed it by replacing the CPU cooler. Thanks, ABRT and MCE. I think I saw some bug fly by several years ago that ABRT's MCE support had broken. Dunno if it still works or not. But it used to work. Michael ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] [Test Week] Fedora Kernel 5.11 2021-03-08
Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.11 Test week, which is happening from 2021-03-08 to 2021-03-16. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in details about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-day@freenode for question and discussion. [0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-08_Kernel_5.11_Test_Week [1] https://testdays.fedorainfracloud.org/events/102 Happy Testing! -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 10 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-71d1af6aca isync-1.4.1-1.el8 7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fedb6fa69d python-aiohttp-3.7.4-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fc2f1ff74c x11vnc-0.9.16-3.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1073219045 privoxy-3.0.32-1.el8 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-a2e8a7475f chromium-88.0.4324.182-2.el8 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-94317ce911 suricata-5.0.6-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6b1b1f9053 python-django-2.2.19-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-58f4d56777 zabbix40-4.0.29-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing Rex-1.13.3-1.el8 dh-make-2.202003-2.el8 radicale-3.0.6-17.el8 Details about builds: Rex-1.13.3-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f545f9f0ab) The friendly automation framework on basis of Perl Update Information: This update brings a the new version 1.13.3 of the friendly automation framework Rex to a Fedora box near you. ChangeLog: * Sat Mar 6 2021 Dominic Hopf - 1.13.3-1 - Update to 1.13.3 (#1936026) References: [ 1 ] Bug #1936026 - Rex-1.13.3 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1936026 dh-make-2.202003-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3c8f7df2d4) Tool that converts source archives into Debian package source Update Information: Update to 2.202003 (#1869057) ChangeLog: * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.202003-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Dec 1 2020 Fedora Release Monitoring - 2.202003-1 - Update to 2.202003 (#1869057) * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.202001-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild * Sat Feb 29 2020 Fedora Release Monitoring - 2.202001-1 - Update to 2.202001 (#1808626) * Tue Jan 28 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - 2.201903-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild References: [ 1 ] Bug #1869057 - dh-make-2.202003 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869057 radicale-3.0.6-17.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e2332df4d7) A simple CalDAV (calendar) and CardDAV (contact) server Update Information: Move SELinux into dedicated subpackage and add as suggestion to main package (RHBZ#1934895) ChangeLog: * Fri Mar 5 2021 Peter Bieringer - 3.0.6-17 - Move SELinux into dedicated subpackage and add as suggestion to main package (RHBZ#1934895) References: [ 1 ] Bug #1934895 - Extra requires: selinux https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1934895 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
On Sun, Mar 07, 2021 at 10:00:56AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > On 3/5/21 4:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > >>> mcelog.service loaded active running > >>> Machine Check Exception Logging Daemon > >> This is another one for which it is questionable to have it running, or is > >> this a machine with > >> ECC RAM ? And even then I'm not sure if it adds a lot of value, or if just > >> like smartd it > >> just logs some stuff into syslog (where normal users won't see it). > > > > I disagree that those logs are useless -- I often help normal users, and > > running commands to look back in the logs for problems is a common > > diagnostic step. This could be better, of course. > > But for MCE exceptions, specifically ECC errors I would expect the kernel to > log these > through dmesg anyways and then the mcelog service has very little added value > IMHO > (I have no experience with machines with ECC RAM). It seems mce events can also be generated by the CPU. From the man page: data corruption detected in the CPU caches, in main memory by an integrated memory controller, data transfer errors on the front side bus or CPU interconnect or other internal errors. ... When an uncorrected machine check error happens that the kernel cannot recover from then it will usually panic the system. In this case when there was a warm reset after the panic mcelog should pick up the machine check errors after reboot. It seems like it could be useful even without ECC… > smartd at least has the fact that if it does not run nothing else is asking > the > disk for its smart reports going for it (and that it may tickle bugs in some > disks, which otherwise would not be tickled, going against it). > > Note I still think smartd is of questionable value too, esp. as long as any > messages which it sends out only end up in the journal and are note pushed > to the user inside the UI in some way. As for the argument that it sends > email if local email delivery is setup, well we don't set that up OOTB and > this is about OOTB configuraiton, someone who can setup local email can > also do a "dnf install smartd". I think it's useful to have hardware errors logged, even if nobody immediately looks at them. If a laptop gets broken, and a more knowledgeable persons is asked to look at it and there are hardware errors in the log, be it from mce or smart, that is a very effective way to diagnose the issue and save a few hours wasted on trying to figure out an elusive bug. (This also applies to logs attached in bugzilla: especially when we had the service watchdog enabled, people would regularly report services "hanging". It seems many of those were caused by disk issues, and it's nice to have smartd in there.) In summary: in both cases, I think keeping mcelog and smartd (and other similar things) enabled by default is still useful. We should just make sure they quickly and quietly exit if not applicable on given hardware. Zbyszek > >> So given that I got a couple of "go for it" reactions and that I was > >> already toying with the idea anyways I might actually try to make such > >> a spin happen. > >> > >> The biggest problem for doing such a spin is finding the time for it... > >> > >> Are there any people who would be interested in working on / co-maintaining > >> such a spin with me ? > > > > I am interested in it happening but can't sign up for more stuff. :) > > I know the feeling. > > > It seems like this kind of parallels the Minimization objective (which > > focuses on package dependencies). That's kind of mothballed right now (I > > think because Adam is working on RHEL 9 stuff?) and I wouldn't want to > > overload that more, but maybe there's some kind of useful connection? > > This is more about runtime overhead, where as the Minimization objective > focuses more on pure disk-space consumption. Sure, there is some overlap > but not much. > > Regards, > > Hans > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not
Re: Review request: mingw-librttopo
On 06.03.2021 21:09, Sandro Mani wrote: It's a pretty trivial package. Happy to review in exchange. Done. No reviews needed. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
Hans de Goede wrote: > But for MCE exceptions, specifically ECC errors I would expect the kernel to > log these > through dmesg anyways and then the mcelog service has very little added value > IMHO > (I have no experience with machines with ECC RAM). > > Esp. given that ECC RAM is something which most Fedora Workstation users won't > have, so having this included / enabled by default feels wrong IMHO. Well, to get x86-64 with ECC you need to choose AMD, or else an Intel processor marketed for big hefty servers, but MCE catches more errors than just memory bit errors. Do the ECC-less Intel processors also lack all other MCE support? On my ECC-capable Ryzen workstation, mcelog is not started because /sys/module/edac_mce_amd/initstate exists. Apparently the daemon is considered unnecessary when this kernel module is active. On the other hand there's a kernel thread called "edac-poller", so I don't know whether the runtime overhead is any lower. Björn Persson pgpxIV_q_B1uk.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210307.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210306.0): ID: 802342 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802342 ID: 802349 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/802349 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:12:34PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > > smartd even sends emails – that's how I was informed > > about one of my disks dying, few weeks ago, I thought it would send email, but then I noticed that it's started with "--capabilities", which breaks email notification according to the manpage, so now I don't know what to believe. It does indeed seem much less useful if it can't send email. Unless Logwatch picks up the warnings from the log? But that again requires local email. > It can, but most people don't have a good setup for even local mail > delivery. Out of the box, we don't really do anything useful. It wouldn't take much. Install Postfix, and when Anaconda creates the first user account, have it add a mapping from root to that username in /etc/aliases. Then a variety of MUAs can pick up the emails from /var/spool/mail. But I guess those who want fewer daemons won't be happy to see Postfix added just for a chance to be warned about an imminent breakdown. Björn Persson pgpK7UBRzp74e.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signatur ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F34 gdm login prompt goes crazy when a fingerprint reader with no enrolled prints is present
Hi, On 3/5/21 4:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:05:00PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> mcelog.service loaded active running >>> Machine Check Exception Logging Daemon >> This is another one for which it is questionable to have it running, or is >> this a machine with >> ECC RAM ? And even then I'm not sure if it adds a lot of value, or if just >> like smartd it >> just logs some stuff into syslog (where normal users won't see it). > > I disagree that those logs are useless -- I often help normal users, and > running commands to look back in the logs for problems is a common > diagnostic step. This could be better, of course. But for MCE exceptions, specifically ECC errors I would expect the kernel to log these through dmesg anyways and then the mcelog service has very little added value IMHO (I have no experience with machines with ECC RAM). Esp. given that ECC RAM is something which most Fedora Workstation users won't have, so having this included / enabled by default feels wrong IMHO. smartd at least has the fact that if it does not run nothing else is asking the disk for its smart reports going for it (and that it may tickle bugs in some disks, which otherwise would not be tickled, going against it). Note I still think smartd is of questionable value too, esp. as long as any messages which it sends out only end up in the journal and are note pushed to the user inside the UI in some way. As for the argument that it sends email if local email delivery is setup, well we don't set that up OOTB and this is about OOTB configuraiton, someone who can setup local email can also do a "dnf install smartd". >> So given that I got a couple of "go for it" reactions and that I was >> already toying with the idea anyways I might actually try to make such >> a spin happen. >> >> The biggest problem for doing such a spin is finding the time for it... >> >> Are there any people who would be interested in working on / co-maintaining >> such a spin with me ? > > I am interested in it happening but can't sign up for more stuff. :) I know the feeling. > It seems like this kind of parallels the Minimization objective (which > focuses on package dependencies). That's kind of mothballed right now (I > think because Adam is working on RHEL 9 stuff?) and I wouldn't want to > overload that more, but maybe there's some kind of useful connection? This is more about runtime overhead, where as the Minimization objective focuses more on pure disk-space consumption. Sure, there is some overlap but not much. Regards, Hans ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
