Fedora-Cloud-33-20210314.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210313.0): ID: 813643 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813643 ID: 813650 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813650 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (aarch64), 6/7 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210313.0): ID: 813646 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813646 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[389-devel] 389 DS nightly 2021-03-14 - 95% PASS
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2021/03/14/report-389-ds-base-2.0.3-20210314gitd5fdea905.fc33.x86_64.html ___ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938401] ack-3.5.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938401 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-dba0a1e900 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 33. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-dba0a1e900 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210313.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 10/126 (aarch64) ID: 813393 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813393 ID: 813402 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813402 ID: 813404 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813404 ID: 813435 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813435 ID: 813444 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813444 ID: 813450 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813450 ID: 813469 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813469 ID: 813495 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813495 ID: 813511 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813511 ID: 813588 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813588 ID: 813607 Test: aarch64 universal install_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813607 ID: 813617 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813617 ID: 813622 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813622 ID: 813627 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813627 ID: 813634 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813634 Soft failed openQA tests: 14/187 (x86_64), 17/126 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) ID: 813316 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813316 ID: 813317 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813317 ID: 813337 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813337 ID: 813362 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813362 ID: 813369 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813369 ID: 813370 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813370 ID: 813425 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813425 ID: 813426 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813426 ID: 813434 Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813434 ID: 813447 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813447 ID: 813473 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813473 ID: 813478 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813478 ID: 813483 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813483 ID: 813486 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813486 ID: 813505 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813505 ID: 813535 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813535 ID: 813536 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813536 ID: 813537 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_hdd URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813537 ID: 813538 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_nfs URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813538 ID: 813539 Test: x86_64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813539 ID: 813544 Test: x86_64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813544 ID: 813571 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813571 ID: 813583 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813583 ID: 813601 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_configured@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813601 ID: 813602
Re: ELN SIG First Meeting
On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 11:49 AM Davide Cavalca via devel wrote: > > On Mon, 2021-03-01 at 09:26 -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I'd like to encourage anyone interested in this meeting to submit > > agenda topics by replying to this email. Currently the agenda > > One thing I'd be interested in exploring is the feasibility of > extending ELN to cover EPEL as well. This would make it easier to keep > EPEL consistent between major releases (as packages would get branched > automatically). It would also make it possible to test the combined ELN > + EPEL snapshot and find potential issues early on in the process. > Sorry for coming late to the discussion. I took a week off and all sorts of things happened while I was gone. I believe Kevin and Smooge, and possibly even you Davide got this backwards. And I think if we do this right, this can be a thing. When we started ELN, one of the major promises was that it wouldn't interfere with regular Fedora work. That your average Fedora packager that didn't care about ELN, could continue to not care about ELN and nothing would change. I believe we (ELN SIG) should extend the same courtesy to EPEL and the EPEL community and packagers. The email discussion went in the direction of all the work that EPEL would need to do to create an ELN EPEL. But we (ELN SIG) shouldn't have expected that. We should have expected to do all the work. So, if we flip this around, where everything is on ELN, how would that work. We create a new Fedora target and tag: eln-extra (so people do NOT confuse it with real EPEL) eln-extra-build inherits from itself and eln-build If a package is built against the eln-extra target, and it is successful, it gets tagged with the eln-extra tag. There is a daily (or some other time period) repo creation. No images, just a repo, like epel. There is a list of packages, similar to the list of packages used to create the ELN list, on some github/gitlab/pagure repo. If you put a package on that list, you associate your name with that package. Just like ELN, when a package on the eln-extra list gets built in rawhide, it get's built in eln-extra. In fact, it would be best if we just altered the ELN trigger/periodic scripts to look at this list along with the regular ELN list. What are people's thoughts on this? No extra work on EPEL. If someone, or some company wants to test ELN and need packages not in ELN, they can add the packages to the list, with their name/company associated with that package. It would get built, put in the repo, and they can then run their ELN test with the package they need. Thoughts? Troy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Heads Up: Update to proj-8.0.0 in F35 and F34
On 3/6/21 4:52 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'll be updating proj to 8.0.0, first in F35 in a side tag and then F34. I'll rebuild the following dependent packages: gdl vtk I've added patches for proj 8 support to these packages and submitted builds in the side tag. Orion -- Orion Poplawski he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me Manager of NWRA Technical Systems 720-772-5637 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/ smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Candidate Beta-1.2 Available Now!
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 34 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation testing! For more information on release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/34 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Beta_1.2_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Beta_1.2_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Beta_1.2_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Beta_1.2_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Beta_1.2_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Beta_1.2_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Beta_1.2_Security_Lab All Beta priority test cases for each of these test pages [2] must pass in order to meet the Beta Release Criteria [3]. Help is available on #fedora-qa on irc.freenode.net [4], or on the test list [5]. Current Blocker and Freeze Exception bugs: http://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/current [1] http://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-34/f-34-quality-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Beta_Release_Criteria [4] irc://irc.freenode.net/fedora-qa [5] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/t...@lists.fedoraproject.org/ ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature
fix corruption of your rpm db ! the output of this command is changed : rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 8151 Header SHA256 digest: BAD ... I don't know if dnf update kernel-*.rpm fix this issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature
On 3/13/21 6:39 AM, Cătălin George Feștilă wrote: [root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#3860 Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected b9cf6988fce9f83cb6cbddc260ab4832a15af3e718884156e0c73ba344897c27 != f863601defc3132bc5a1b3d09f23b43ab76c6cf0400a0c1a487ea7b2f680f176) Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected 4d669b407e6d073a73b443fe9cff72c6c5c9330c != c8c5144edd08c952d02166a58ac4b210a621b5f4) It looks like you had some sort of corruption of your rpm db. dkms: removing: digimend 6 (5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64) (x86_64) DKMS: uninstall completed. DKMS: build completed. hid-kye.ko.xz: Complete! Maybe because I used an Huion graphic tablet and I used this command : modprobe -r hid-kye hid-uclogic hid-viewsonic Yes, it's because you have some dkms out-of-tree kernel modules. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 13 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fedb6fa69d python-aiohttp-3.7.4-1.el8 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-fc2f1ff74c x11vnc-0.9.16-3.el8 11 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1073219045 privoxy-3.0.32-1.el8 9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-94317ce911 suricata-5.0.6-1.el8 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-6b1b1f9053 python-django-2.2.19-1.el8 8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-58f4d56777 zabbix40-4.0.29-1.el8 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-e9c2beec98 nagios-4.4.6-4.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-9ca5d37fa8 chromium-89.0.4389.82-1.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-cd16d1b0bf upx-3.96-8.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing holland-1.2.4-1.el8 python-bracex-2.1.1-2.el8 python-wcmatch-8.1.2-3.el8 Details about builds: holland-1.2.4-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-1738900ff3) Pluggable Backup Framework Update Information: Latest upstream release Latest upstream release. ChangeLog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Sam P - 1.2.4-1 - Updated to latest upstream release. * Tue Mar 9 2021 Sam P - 1.2.3-3 - Incorporated changes from pull request #7 from fab for python3-mysqlclient dependency. * Mon Mar 8 2021 Sam P - 1.2.3-2 - Identified github tagging issue and reverted source URL. * Thu Mar 4 2021 Sam P - 1.2.3-1 - Updated to latest upstream release. * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 1.2.2-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild python-bracex-2.1.1-2.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3195bd7317) Bash style brace expander Update Information: Fix this package as per package review (#1929990) ChangeLog: python-wcmatch-8.1.2-3.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-3195bd7317) Wildcard/glob file name matcher Update Information: Fix this package as per package review (#1929990) ChangeLog: ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938396] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1921203] perl-Graph-0.9718 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921203 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-z1w7zmo3/perl-Graph.spec'] returned 1: b'error: line 5: unclosed macro or bad line continuation\n' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1921203] perl-Graph-0.9718 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921203 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-Graph-0.9717 is|perl-Graph-0.9718 is |available |available --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Latest upstream release: 0.9718 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.97.16-2.fc34 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Graph/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/7524/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 11:00:12 -0500, you wrote: >On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote: >> You aren't going to change not just the 15+ year habits of how people >> refer to Fedora, but the even longer habits of how people call Linux >> distributions. > >Again, I'm not out to immediately change colloquial usage. Although I *do* >think that would be a positive, that's not in scope here. It's about how we >formally talk about things ourselves, and this change is just about one very >specific small way in which we do that. So, a community that historically hates typing extra stuff and thus likes to remove vowels and occasionally other letters from commands, who primarily "talks" via text communication, is suddenly going to add the extra word Linux in their communications? Yes, you will be able to force the web team to add the word Linux to every mention of Fedora - but no one else is going to. Which again brings us to what is the point then? If you want to differentiate the OS from the project and other stuff, then you are going to be better off renaming the other stuff than attempting to force through a change to a name that the community and outside world aren't going to follow. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210313.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 17/126 (aarch64), 7/187 (x86_64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210312.n.0): ID: 812946 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_reboot_unmount@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812946 ID: 812947 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812947 ID: 812948 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_update_cli@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812948 ID: 813017 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813017 ID: 813051 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813051 ID: 813103 Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813103 ID: 813112 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_xfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813112 ID: 813122 Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_nfs@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813122 ID: 813125 Test: aarch64 universal install_mirrorlist_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813125 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210312.n.0): ID: 812903 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812903 ID: 812912 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812912 ID: 812923 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812923 ID: 812949 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812949 ID: 812950 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812950 ID: 812951 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812951 ID: 812952 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812952 ID: 812963 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812963 ID: 813030 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813030 ID: 813078 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813078 ID: 813079 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813079 ID: 813107 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813107 ID: 813136 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813136 ID: 813141 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813141 ID: 813146 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813146 Soft failed openQA tests: 55/126 (aarch64), 88/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-34-20210312.n.0): ID: 812960 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812960 ID: 812969 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812969 ID: 812997 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812997 ID: 813002 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813002 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210312.n.0): ID: 812835 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812835 ID: 812836 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812836 ID: 812838 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812838 ID: 812841 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812841 ID: 812842 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812842 ID: 812843 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812843 ID: 812844 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812844 ID: 812845 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_standard_partition_ext4 URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812845 ID: 812846 Test: x86_64
[Bug 1938396] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-3526704f0d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1938396] perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptive-0.106 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938396 Paul Howarth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Getopt-Long-Descriptiv ||e-0.106-1.fc35 Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth --- Rawhide build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63700778 Fedora 34 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=63700928 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210313.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 1 of 43 required tests failed openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 12/187 (x86_64), 22/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0): ID: 812623 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812623 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0): ID: 812564 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812564 ID: 812579 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812579 ID: 812581 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812581 ID: 812599 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812599 ID: 812610 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812610 ID: 812636 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812636 ID: 812637 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812637 ID: 812638 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812638 ID: 812639 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812639 ID: 812650 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812650 ID: 812674 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812674 ID: 812678 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812678 ID: 812690 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812690 ID: 812691 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812691 ID: 812693 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812693 ID: 812697 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812697 ID: 812698 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812698 ID: 812699 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812699 ID: 812701 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812701 ID: 812702 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812702 ID: 812703 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812703 ID: 812716 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812716 ID: 812717 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812717 ID: 812730 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812730 ID: 812739 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812739 ID: 812765 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812765 ID: 812766 Test: x86_64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812766 ID: 812793 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812793 ID: 812794 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812794 ID: 812801 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812801 ID: 812805 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812805 ID: 812823 Test: aarch64 universal install_simple_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812823 ID: 812829 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812829 Soft failed openQA tests: 70/187 (x86_64), 49/126 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0): ID: 812593 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812593 ID: 812682 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi URL:
[EPEL-devel] Re: Xfce 4.16 on EPEL-8
Hi I saw that on this version of Xfce, there "lockscreen" applet does not work. Something is missing Le Wed Mar 03 2021 03:01:31 GMT+0100 (CET), Mukundan Ragavan a écrit : On 2/15/21 7:02 PM, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > >> Mukundan - >> >> Just a note that as mentioned on the CentOS list here: >> https://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2021-February/353317.html >> >> # dnf group install Xfce >> Last metadata expiration check: 0:02:24 ago on Mon 15 Feb 2021 >> 03:41:53 PM MST. >> No match for group package "NetworkManager-gnome" >> No match for group package "thunar-archive-plugin" >> >> So perhaps the comps file needs to get cleaned up? >> > > Indeed. I just forgot to build thunar-archive-plugin. :( > > NetworkManager-gnome just needs to be removed from comps. I will do this. > > I need to update a bunch of packages on EPEL-8 anyway. > Took me a while to get to this but this is done now. thunar-archive-plugin in built on epel8/copr I have submitted a pull request to get rid of nm-gnome from xfce group. Testing and feedback is appreciated. Best, Mukundan. -- GPG Key: E5C8BC67 ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release
On Fri, Mar 12, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0500, Gerald Henriksen wrote: > You aren't going to change not just the 15+ year habits of how people > refer to Fedora, but the even longer habits of how people call Linux > distributions. Again, I'm not out to immediately change colloquial usage. Although I *do* think that would be a positive, that's not in scope here. It's about how we formally talk about things ourselves, and this change is just about one very specific small way in which we do that. -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-34-20210313.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210312.0): ID: 813187 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813187 ID: 813196 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813196 ID: 813203 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813203 Soft failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210312.0): ID: 813179 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813179 ID: 813180 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813180 ID: 813181 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813181 ID: 813195 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813195 Passed openQA tests: 12/15 (aarch64), 12/16 (x86_64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210312.0): ID: 813200 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813200 ID: 813209 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813209 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210313.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd aarch64 Iot dvd x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 3/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210312.0): ID: 813156 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813156 ID: 813159 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813159 ID: 813163 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813163 ID: 813165 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813165 ID: 813167 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813167 ID: 813172 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813172 ID: 813175 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813175 ID: 813176 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813176 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210312.0): ID: 813150 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813150 Passed openQA tests: 12/16 (x86_64), 10/15 (aarch64) Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.46 to 0.32 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/811180#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/813148#downloads -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature
and finally test works https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_kernel_regression : /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds:Not affected /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort:Not affected [mythcat@desk kernel-tests]$ sudo semanage boolean -m --off selinuxuser_execheap ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature
[root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#3860 Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected b9cf6988fce9f83cb6cbddc260ab4832a15af3e718884156e0c73ba344897c27 != f863601defc3132bc5a1b3d09f23b43ab76c6cf0400a0c1a487ea7b2f680f176) Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected 4d669b407e6d073a73b443fe9cff72c6c5c9330c != c8c5144edd08c952d02166a58ac4b210a621b5f4) [root@desk mythcat]# yum clean dbcache 28 files removed [root@desk mythcat]# dnf update kernel-*.rpm ... Running scriptlet: kernel-core-5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64 9/9 dkms: removing: digimend 6 (5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64) (x86_64) Uninstall Beginning Module: digimend Version: 6 Kernel: 5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64 (x86_64) - Status: Before uninstall, this module version was ACTIVE on this kernel. Removing any linked weak-modules hid-kye.ko.xz: - Uninstallation - Deleting from: /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/extra/ - Original module - Archived original module found in the DKMS tree - Moving it to: /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/extra/ hid-uclogic.ko.xz: - Uninstallation - Deleting from: /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/extra/ - Original module - Archived original module found in the DKMS tree - Moving it to: /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/extra/ hid-polostar.ko.xz: - Uninstallation - Deleting from: /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/extra/ - Original module - No original module was found for this module on this kernel. - Use the dkms install command to reinstall any previous module version. hid-viewsonic.ko.xz: - Uninstallation - Deleting from: /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/extra/ - Original module - Archived original module found in the DKMS tree - Moving it to: /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/extra/ depmod Removing original_module from DKMS tree for kernel 5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64 (x86_64) DKMS: uninstall completed. Erasing : kernel-core-5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64 9/9 warning: file /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/updates: remove failed: No such file or directory warning: file /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-viewsonic.ko.xz: remove failed: No such file or directory warning: file /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-uclogic.ko.xz: remove failed: No such file or directory warning: file /lib/modules/5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-kye.ko.xz: remove failed: No such file or directory Running scriptlet: kernel-core-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 9/9 dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 Kernel preparation unnecessary for this kernel. Skipping... Building module: cleaning build area. make -j2 KERNELRELEASE=5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 KVERSION=5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64. cleaning build area DKMS: build completed. hid-kye.ko.xz: Running module version sanity check. - Original module - Found /lib/modules/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-kye.ko.xz - Storing in /var/lib/dkms/digimend/original_module/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/x86_64/ - Archiving for uninstallation purposes - Installation - Installing to /lib/modules/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/extra/ hid-uclogic.ko.xz: Running module version sanity check. - Original module - Found /lib/modules/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-uclogic.ko.xz - Storing in /var/lib/dkms/digimend/original_module/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/x86_64/ - Archiving for uninstallation purposes - Installation - Installing to /lib/modules/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/extra/ hid-polostar.ko.xz: Running module version sanity check. - Original module - Installation - Installing to /lib/modules/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/extra/ hid-viewsonic.ko.xz: Running module version sanity check. - Original module - Found /lib/modules/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/kernel/drivers/hid/hid-viewsonic.ko.xz - Storing in /var/lib/dkms/digimend/original_module/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/x86_64/ - Archiving for uninstallation purposes - Installation - Installing to /lib/modules/5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64/extra/ Adding any weak-modules depmod.. DKMS: install completed. Done. dkms: running auto installation service for kernel 5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 Done. Running scriptlet: kernel-core-5.10.20-200.fc33.x86_64 9/9 Verifying: kernel-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 1/9 Verifying: kernel-core-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 2/9 Verifying: kernel-devel-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 3/9 Verifying: kernel-modules-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64 4/9 Verifying:
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210313.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210312.n.0 NEW: Fedora-34-20210313.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:12 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: SoaS raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-SoaS-34-20210313.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: SoaS raw-xz armhfp Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-SoaS-34-20210313.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-34-20210313.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Server dvd s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-34-20210313.n.0.iso Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210313.n.0.s390x.raw.xz Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz armhfp Path: Labs/armhfp/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-34-20210313.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 s390x Path: Cloud/s390x/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-34-20210313.n.0.s390x.qcow2 Image: Server boot s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-netinst-s390x-34-20210313.n.0.iso Image: Everything boot s390x Path: Everything/s390x/iso/Fedora-Everything-netinst-s390x-34-20210313.n.0.iso Image: Container_Base docker s390x Path: Container/s390x/images/Fedora-Container-Base-34-20210313.n.0.s390x.tar.xz Image: Server raw-xz aarch64 Path: Server/aarch64/images/Fedora-Server-34-20210313.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz Image: KDE raw-xz aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/images/Fedora-KDE-34-20210313.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature
[root@desk mythcat]# rpm --rebuilddb error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#8151 Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected c1c39a204c8615afaa00d00e81982e55c6ce1b0f88b9703de5fafebb5abe67a1 != 86dbba11d5da0b2ebb39edbd68719299e9a848c83b25c8235a27fd1d9d75d024) Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected 01f1aa16659be0a1599089d8c73e255a83895910 != 2aaed95924173cd61df40b775dba2e2e1ec160c7) error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#8496 Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected 33aebb8c3b7f8547fc9dc96ed5564cb8e1eea563a9b0b329df252a2887f2e455 != 0637ac4049b45785fca7fad727a31927c4d16ac7ca0db2ec421497d8d43d1cdf) Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected 3f5eb92de10d1928163c1145c5332ed9f82d5820 != 14cfece99c897736b8ddf90907d797a4e8ce20ff) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: update kernel with error and BAD Signature
[root@desk mythcat]# dnf list fedora-gpg-keys Last metadata expiration check: 1:06:12 ago on Sat 13 Mar 2021 02:57:37 PM EET. Installed Packages fedora-gpg-keys.noarch [root@desk mythcat]# dnf repolist repo idrepo name WineHQ WineHQ packages adobe-linux-x86_64 Adobe Systems Incorporated code Visual Studio Code copr:copr.fedorainfracloud.org:group_dotnet-sig:dotnet Copr repo for dotnet owned by @dotnet-sig fedora Fedora 33 - x86_64 google-chrome google-chrome rpmfusion-free RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Free rpmfusion-free-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Free - Updates rpmfusion-nonfree RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Nonfree rpmfusion-nonfree-updates RPM Fusion for Fedora 33 - Nonfree - Updates security_zeek The Zeek Network Security Monitor. (Fedora_33) teamviewer TeamViewer - x86_64 updatesFedora 33 - x86_64 - Updates and I got this error : [root@desk mythcat]# dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates -y fedora-gpg-keys error: SELECT hnum, blob FROM 'Packages': 11: database disk image is malformed Last metadata expiration check: 1:07:28 ago on Sat 13 Mar 2021 02:57:37 PM EET. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! then the next command show me is ok , this is strange... [root@desk mythcat]# dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates -y fedora-gpg-keys Last metadata expiration check: 1:08:15 ago on Sat 13 Mar 2021 02:57:37 PM EET. Dependencies resolved. Nothing to do. Complete! ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
update kernel with error and BAD Signature
Any idea ?
I try to follow this wiki page
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-03-08_Kernel_5.11_Test_Week
according with this article:
https://fedoramagazine.org/contribute-at-the-fedora-audio-kernel-5-11-and-i18n-test-days/
This is the errors and BAD signature response :
...
[root@desk mythcat]# dnf update kernel-*.rpm
Last metadata expiration check: 0:58:18 ago on Sat 13 Mar 2021 02:57:37 PM EET.
Package kernel-debug not installed, cannot update it.
No match for argument: kernel-debug-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64.rpm
Package kernel-debug-core not installed, cannot update it.
No match for argument: kernel-debug-core-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64.rpm
Package kernel-debug-devel not installed, cannot update it.
No match for argument: kernel-debug-devel-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64.rpm
Package kernel-debug-modules not installed, cannot update it.
No match for argument: kernel-debug-modules-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64.rpm
Package kernel-debug-modules-extra not installed, cannot update it.
No match for argument: kernel-debug-modules-extra-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64.rpm
Package kernel-debug-modules-internal not installed, cannot update it.
No match for argument: kernel-debug-modules-internal-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64.rpm
Package kernel-modules-internal not installed, cannot update it.
No match for argument: kernel-modules-internal-5.11.3-50.fc33.x86_64.rpm
Dependencies resolved.
Package Arch VersionRepository Size
Installing:
kernel x86_645.11.3-50.fc33 @commandline146 k
kernel-core x86_645.11.3-50.fc33 @commandline 34 M
kernel-develx86_645.11.3-50.fc33 @commandline 14 M
kernel-modules x86_645.11.3-50.fc33 @commandline 31 M
kernel-modules-extrax86_645.11.3-50.fc33 @commandline2.1 M
Removing:
kernel x86_645.10.20-200.fc33 @updates 0
kernel-core x86_645.10.20-200.fc33 @updates 74 M
kernel-develx86_645.10.20-200.fc33 @updates 53 M
kernel-modules x86_645.10.20-200.fc33 @updates 30 M
kernel-modules-extrax86_645.10.20-200.fc33 @updates1.9 M
Transaction Summary
Install 5 Packages
Remove 5 Packages
Total size: 81 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running transaction check
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#8496
Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9570ff31: BAD
Header SHA256 digest: BAD (Expected
33aebb8c3b7f8547fc9dc96ed5564cb8e1eea563a9b0b329df252a2887f2e455 !=
0637ac4049b45785fca7fad727a31927c4d16ac7ca0db2ec421497d8d43d1cdf)
Header SHA1 digest: BAD (Expected 3f5eb92de10d1928163c1145c5332ed9f82d5820 !=
14cfece99c897736b8ddf90907d797a4e8ce20ff)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 58, in
main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 201, in
user_main
errcode = main(args)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 67, in main
return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 106, in _main
return cli_run(cli, base)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 130, in cli_run
ret = resolving(cli, base)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 176, in
resolving
base.do_transaction(display=displays)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 246, in
do_transaction
tid = super(BaseCli, self).do_transaction(display)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/base.py", line 896, in
do_transaction
self.transaction._populate_rpm_ts(self._ts)
File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dnf/db/group.py", line 331, in
_populate_rpm_ts
ts.addErase(tsi.pkg.idx)
File "/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/rpm/transaction.py", line 103, in
addErase
raise rpm.error("package not installed")
_rpm.error: package not installed
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] Fedora 34 Branched 20210313.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 34 Branched 20210313.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan Notable package version changes: anaconda - 1.1: anaconda-34.24.5-4.fc34.src, 20210313.n.0: anaconda-34.24.5-5.fc34.src Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/34 You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download locations, and enter results on the Summary page: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210313.n.0_Summary The individual test result pages are: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210313.n.0_Installation https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210313.n.0_Base https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210313.n.0_Server https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210313.n.0_Cloud https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210313.n.0_Desktop https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_34_Branched_20210313.n.0_Security_Lab Thank you for testing! -- Mail generated by relvalconsumer: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/relvalconsumer ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210313.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210312.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210313.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:5 Upgraded packages: 93 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 306.57 KiB Size of dropped packages:44.69 MiB Size of upgraded packages: 1.70 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 655.12 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Server dvd s390x Path: Server/s390x/iso/Fedora-Server-dvd-s390x-Rawhide-20210313.n.0.iso Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz armhfp Path: Labs/armhfp/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Rawhide-20210313.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: secvarctl-0.1-1.fc35 Summary: A command line tool for managing Secure Boot Variables on POWER RPMs:secvarctl Size:306.57 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: eclipse-pydev-1:8.0.0-2.fc34 Summary: Eclipse Python development plug-in RPMs:eclipse-pydev Size:26.06 MiB Package: jython-2.7.1-16.fc34 Summary: A Java implementation of the Python language RPMs:jython jython-demo jython-javadoc Size:11.23 MiB Package: netty-4.1.51-2.fc34 Summary: An asynchronous event-driven network application framework and tools for Java RPMs:netty netty-javadoc Size:6.39 MiB Package: os-maven-plugin-1.6.2-3.fc34 Summary: Maven plugin for generating platform-dependent properties RPMs:os-maven-plugin os-maven-plugin-javadoc Size:306.49 KiB Package: xmlrpc-1:3.1.3-28.fc34 Summary: Java XML-RPC implementation RPMs:xmlrpc-client xmlrpc-common xmlrpc-javadoc xmlrpc-server Size:724.42 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: acl-2.3.0-1.fc35 Old package: acl-2.2.53-10.fc34 Summary: Access control list utilities RPMs: acl libacl libacl-devel Size: 913.99 KiB Size change: -1.34 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Kamil Dudka - 2.3.0-1 - new upstream release Package: afpfs-ng-0.8.1-34.fc35 Old package: afpfs-ng-0.8.1-33.fc34 Summary: Apple Filing Protocol client RPMs: afpfs-ng afpfs-ng-devel fuse-afp Size: 934.50 KiB Size change: -3.46 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Michal Ambroz - 0.8.1-340 - fix issue 1507944 Package: antlr3-1:3.5.2-32.fc35 Old package: antlr3-1:3.5.2-31.fc34 Summary: ANother Tool for Language Recognition RPMs: antlr3-C antlr3-C++-devel antlr3-C-devel antlr3-C-docs antlr3-java antlr3-javadoc antlr3-javascript antlr3-tool Size: 63.91 MiB Size change: -2.52 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Jerry James - 1:3.5.2-32 - Add bootstrap conditional (bz 1847093) Package: antlr4-project-4.9.2-1.fc35 Old package: antlr4-project-4.9.1-2.fc34 Summary: Parser generator (ANother Tool for Language Recognition) RPMs: antlr4 antlr4-cpp-runtime antlr4-cpp-runtime-devel antlr4-doc antlr4-javadoc antlr4-maven-plugin antlr4-runtime antlr4-runtime-test-annotation-processors antlr4-runtime-test-annotations golang-antlr4-runtime-devel nodejs-antlr4 python3-antlr4-runtime swift-antlr4-runtime Size: 9.71 MiB Size change: 5.08 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Jerry James - 4.9.2-1 - Version 4.9.2 Package: armacycles-ad-0.2.9.1.0-1.fc35 Old package: armacycles-ad-0.2.8.3.5-3.fc34 Summary: A lightcycle game in 3D RPMs: armacycles-ad armacycles-ad-dedicated Size: 11.58 MiB Size change: 887.83 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 0.2.9.1-1 - 0.2.9.1 Package: attr-2.5.0-1.fc35 Old package: attr-2.4.48-11.fc34 Summary: Utilities for managing filesystem extended attributes RPMs: attr libattr libattr-devel Size: 549.97 KiB Size change: -5.70 KiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Kamil Dudka - 2.5.0-1 - new upstream release Package: awscli-1.19.26-1.fc35 Old package: awscli-1.19.25-1.fc35 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 1.99 MiB Size change: 405 B Changelog: * Fri Mar 12 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.19.26-1 - 1.19.26 Package: bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-44.fc35 Old package: bitstream-vera-fonts-1.10-41.fc33 Summary: The Bitstream Vera font families RPMs: bitstream-vera-fonts-all bitstream-vera-sans-fonts bitstream-vera-sans-mono-fonts bitstream-vera-serif-fonts Size: 308.55 KiB Size change: 1.62 KiB Changelog: * Mon Apr 27 2020 Nicolas Mailhot - 1.10-42 Workaround Fedora problems created by rpm commit 93604e2 * Mon Jul 27 2020 Fedora Release Engineering - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild * Tue Jan 26 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild * Wed Mar 03 2021 David King - 1.10-44 - Fix build in F34+ (#1930508) Package: bzflag-2.4.22-1.fc35 Old package: bzflag-2.4.18-11.fc35 Summary: 3D multi
Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release
Gerald Henriksen wrote: > On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:21:18 -0500, you wrote: > >>I would put it this way: this change _helps recognize_ that Fedora is more >>than its main product. This isn't new; EPEL has been part of Fedora since >>the beginning, and CoreOS has been since it replaced Project Atomic. > > You want this change to do that, it will fail to do that. > > You aren't going to change not just the 15+ year habits of how people > refer to Fedora, but the even longer habits of how people call Linux > distributions. > > Regardless of what their official titles are the public all refer to > them by their simple names - Fedora, Debian, Ubuntu, Suse, Red Hat, > Centos, etc. In addition, "Fedora Linux" is no better than "Fedora" at distinguishing it from CoreOS, which is also "Linux" (actually, a GNU/Linux distribution like Fedora), or EPEL, which sits on top of Red Hat Enterprise *Linux*. Adding "Linux" to the name of the main product does nothing to differentiate it from the other products. Kevin Kofler ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Interesting growth trend in Rawhide
Hi, Am 12.03.21 um 18:50 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: Well, sure, but I doubt it. None of the pinephone editions has shipped with Fedora, so it would take people seeking it out and installing it, so I don't know that there would be too much increase just from this. It was just a theory, that matched with the points in time. True, Fedora did not get shiped with the PP CEs, but it's a fact that around Sep. 2020 the popularity of PP kickstarted, due to the available hardware release, which got marked by the CE availability. As anyone could write it's beloved distro release on a sdcard and boot it with any PP, so people did it. Thats also i came to my Fedora PP ;) We already discussed it in the mobiliy channel, we can add "VARIANT_ID" to our /etc/os-release and mark it mobiliy ( not a finally decided yet ). This way we get more reliable data. This also will help with the question, if an own Fedora Spin is worth the effort. @SJSmoogen: I agree, from those numbers, it looks more like x86_64 as source of the increase. Best regards, Marius Schwarz ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210313.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210312.0): ID: 812514 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812514 ID: 812521 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/812521 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
