Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release
On 3/9/21 7:43 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: 2. Why Linux and not GNU/Linux? Linux is just a kernel. GNU/Linux is an OS. Fedora Linux is an OS. Although GNU project utilities are indeed essential, Fedora Linux consists of more than those plus Linux, and the contributions of many of those other projects is equally essential. Stephen's right to point out that the Linux vs GNU/Linux arguments have been mostly the same for 20 years. Very few of those arguments are objective or logical, IMO. What if we did have a way to define Linux, GNU/Linux and Fedora, though? Something neither arbitrary nor capricious... One of the bad arguments, seen in this thread too, is whether or not Linux is an OS or just a kernel. I think we can accept that Linux is an operating system on its own, though it's one that implements a non-standard, de facto interface. The GNU operating system, on the other hand, is a mostly conformant implementation of POSIX and related standards. Its most common variant is GNU/Linux. Because it is an implementation of a formal standard, we can objectively identify the GNU/Linux operating system. The LSB also provides a useful definition of an operating system which extends beyond POSIX and related standards. Fedora does produce an operating system that implements that standard, but that operating system isn't typically distributed on its own. Rather, it's a small part of the Fedora software distribution. I think it makes sense to differentiate Fedora the operating system from Fedora the software distribution, because calling the entire distribution an operating system needlessly strains the definition of that term. And that means that Fedora is a project, Fedora is an operating system, and Fedora is a software distribution. If "Fedora Linux" has officially been the name of anything in the past, it's escaped my notice. When my laptop boots, it prominently displays a logo that says "Fedora". If we're going to rename the operating system from "Fedora" to "Fedora Linux", and that name isn't used to differentiate a variant from one with a different kernel, then I think it's kind of conspicuous that we're using the name of the kernel and not the name of the POSIX operating system that Fedora extends. And my opinion is that choosing not to acknowledge GNU makes the project less welcoming and friendly to those of us for whom Free Software is an ethical concern before a technical one. It's also rather conspicuous that when it comes to Apache httpd and Eclipse IDE, we honor the name used by the people who wrote the software, but when it comes to GNU/Linux, our standards for naming are completely different. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Starting raid-check.timer renders system unusable
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 1:47 PM Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 17:52 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > > I'm really hoping that I'm missing something obvious here, but I fear > > that a good chunk of our Fedora systems will be unbootable if they're > > rebooted without disabling raid-check.timer. > > Just to follow up on this, it appears that the problem is limited to > systems in the Europe/Dublin time zone. Not good, but not the disaster > I was fearing. Never been so glad to miss something obvious. ;) Europe/Dublin is about to switch GMT->IST but likewise UK is about to go GMT->BST so I'm wondering if the problem might actually pick up? IRC user chrisawi points out that: >today, raid-check.timer's trigger is Sun 2021-03-28 01:00:00 >yesterday, it was Sun 2021-03-21 01:00:00 And raid-check.timer contains: OnCalendar=Sun *-*-* 01:00:00 The switch from GMT->IST and GMT->BST happen on 2021-03-28 01:00:00 Conversely in most of Europe, it will change 2021-03-28 but with two differences that might be relevant: 02:00:00, and from Standard to Daylight time. -- Chris Murphy ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Starting raid-check.timer renders system unusable
On 22/03/2021 03:46, Jonathan Dieter wrote: On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 17:52 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: I'm really hoping that I'm missing something obvious here, but I fear that a good chunk of our Fedora systems will be unbootable if they're rebooted without disabling raid-check.timer. Just to follow up on this, it appears that the problem is limited to systems in the Europe/Dublin time zone. Not good, but not the disaster I was fearing. Never been so glad to miss something obvious. ;) Also, with raid-check.timer enabled I get [egreshko@f33g ~]$ sudo timedatectl set-timezone Europe/Dublin [egreshko@f33g ~]$ date Sun Mar 21 22:49:06 GMT 2021 [egreshko@f33g ~]$ sudo timedatectl set-timezone Asia/Taipei Appears to hang at this point. But a minute or so later Failed to set time zone: Connection timed out -- People who believe they don't make mistakes have already made one. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Starting raid-check.timer renders system unusable
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 17:52 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > I'm really hoping that I'm missing something obvious here, but I fear > that a good chunk of our Fedora systems will be unbootable if they're > rebooted without disabling raid-check.timer. Just to follow up on this, it appears that the problem is limited to systems in the Europe/Dublin time zone. Not good, but not the disaster I was fearing. Never been so glad to miss something obvious. ;) Jonathan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Starting raid-check.timer renders system unusable
On 21/03/2021 17:52, Jonathan Dieter wrote: There is a workaround: disabling raid-check.timer, but, if you can't boot due to this bug, you have to boot into single-user mode (which requires a root password to have been set). Adding systemd.mask=raid-check.timer to the kernel command line when booting is another way to get past the hang. Tom -- Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) http://compton.nu/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: systemd-oomd kills wrong application (F34, KDE)
Yes, it is my bugreport. Sorry for my english. Next is the google translate: It is easy to imagine the situation (as it was with me in general): a person works, launches something that eats up memory, it falls, the person starts it again in bewilderment, and then his other working application is killed. And the logs are empty. вс, 21 мар. 2021 г. в 21:21, Alexey A. : > > The bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340 > > пн, 22 мар. 2021 г. в 03:12, Vascom : > > > > Hi all. > > > > I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd in F34. > > This oomd kills my work application during the second run of the stress > > test. > > And I create this ticket: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340 > > > > Can anybody confirm that behaviour? > > > > Also I don't see any logs about this incident, nor what application > > was killed, nor why, nor when. > > > > May be we need some more discussion about enabling systemd-oomd by > > default for F34? > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Vasiliy Glazov > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: systemd-oomd kills wrong application (F34, KDE)
The bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340 пн, 22 мар. 2021 г. в 03:12, Vascom : > > Hi all. > > I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd in F34. > This oomd kills my work application during the second run of the stress test. > And I create this ticket: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340 > > Can anybody confirm that behaviour? > > Also I don't see any logs about this incident, nor what application > was killed, nor why, nor when. > > May be we need some more discussion about enabling systemd-oomd by > default for F34? > > -- > Best regards, > Vasiliy Glazov > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Starting raid-check.timer renders system unusable
On Sun, 2021-03-21 at 17:52 +, Jonathan Dieter wrote: > There is a workaround: disabling raid-check.timer, but, if you can't > boot due to this bug, you have to boot into single-user mode (which > requires a root password to have been set). As Tom Hughes just pointed out to me, if you're stuck with an unbootable system, you can add systemd.mask=raid-check.timer to the kernel command line. Jonathan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: systemd-oomd kills wrong application (F34, KDE)
Only this мар 21 15:19:14 milkyway.localdomain systemd-oomd[1538]: Swap used (7957565440) / total (8489267200) is more than 90.00% мар 21 15:19:51 milkyway.localdomain systemd-oomd[1538]: Swap used (8081399808) / total (8489267200) is more than 90.00% вс, 21 мар. 2021 г. в 21:18, Alexey A. : > > What is in the journal? > > пн, 22 мар. 2021 г. в 03:12, Vascom : > > > > Hi all. > > > > I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd in F34. > > This oomd kills my work application during the second run of the stress > > test. > > And I create this ticket: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340 > > > > Can anybody confirm that behaviour? > > > > Also I don't see any logs about this incident, nor what application > > was killed, nor why, nor when. > > > > May be we need some more discussion about enabling systemd-oomd by > > default for F34? > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Vasiliy Glazov > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: systemd-oomd kills wrong application (F34, KDE)
What is in the journal? пн, 22 мар. 2021 г. в 03:12, Vascom : > > Hi all. > > I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd in F34. > This oomd kills my work application during the second run of the stress test. > And I create this ticket: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340 > > Can anybody confirm that behaviour? > > Also I don't see any logs about this incident, nor what application > was killed, nor why, nor when. > > May be we need some more discussion about enabling systemd-oomd by > default for F34? > > -- > Best regards, > Vasiliy Glazov > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
systemd-oomd kills wrong application (F34, KDE)
Hi all. I want to draw your attention to the bug in systemd-oomd in F34. This oomd kills my work application during the second run of the stress test. And I create this ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941340 Can anybody confirm that behaviour? Also I don't see any logs about this incident, nor what application was killed, nor why, nor when. May be we need some more discussion about enabling systemd-oomd by default for F34? -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Starting raid-check.timer renders system unusable
Hey everyone, For reference, a bug report has been filed at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941335 I just wanted to give a heads up that I came across a bug today that renders Fedora 33 systems unbootable, even after a clean install. If systemd starts raid-check.timer, it gets stuck in what looks like a busy loop, is unable to start new services, systemctl stops responding to commands, and we end up with a lot of zombie processes. The problem is that raid-check.timer (a part of mdadm) is part of the default boot process in Fedora Workstation, and the bug also exists on the version of systemd installed with F33 GA. I've tested on four different systems, each running F33 installed in different ways (some upgrades, some fresh F33 installs), and on each of them, starting raid-check.timer makes the system unusable. There is a workaround: disabling raid-check.timer, but, if you can't boot due to this bug, you have to boot into single-user mode (which requires a root password to have been set). Manually experimenting with dates seems to indicate that this bug is triggered if the current date is after March 3rd, 2021 at 1:00AM, which is why we haven't seen this bug before today. I'm really hoping that I'm missing something obvious here, but I fear that a good chunk of our Fedora systems will be unbootable if they're rebooted without disabling raid-check.timer. Jonathan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-34-20210321.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 9/187 (x86_64), 13/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210320.n.1): ID: 823877 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823877 ID: 823905 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823905 ID: 823906 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823906 ID: 823907 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823907 ID: 823908 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823908 ID: 823910 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823910 ID: 823913 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823913 ID: 823925 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_nfs_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823925 ID: 823973 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823973 ID: 824095 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824095 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210320.n.1): ID: 823850 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823850 ID: 823863 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823863 ID: 823868 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823868 ID: 823879 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823879 ID: 823985 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823985 ID: 823986 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823986 ID: 823999 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823999 ID: 824008 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824008 ID: 824062 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824062 ID: 824063 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824063 ID: 824070 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824070 ID: 824074 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824074 Soft failed openQA tests: 6/187 (x86_64), 6/126 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210320.n.1): ID: 823812 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823812 ID: 823837 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823837 ID: 823860 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823860 ID: 823862 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823862 ID: 823900 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823900 ID: 823901 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823901 ID: 823922 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823922 ID: 823948 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823948 ID: 823953 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823953 ID: 823980 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823980 ID: 824046 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824046 ID: 824097 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824097 Passed openQA tests: 172/187 (x86_64), 107/126 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210320.n.1): ID: 823884 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823884 ID: 823891 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_background URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823891 ID: 823920 Test: aarch64 Ser
Fedora-Rawhide-20210321.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check! All required tests passed Failed openQA tests: 12/187 (x86_64), 23/126 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210320.n.0): ID: 823534 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823534 ID: 823594 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823594 ID: 823624 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823624 ID: 823628 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823628 ID: 823629 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823629 ID: 823630 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823630 ID: 823632 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823632 ID: 823636 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823636 ID: 823637 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823637 ID: 823638 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823638 ID: 823642 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_terminal@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823642 ID: 823659 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_lvmthin URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823659 ID: 823757 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823757 ID: 823771 Test: aarch64 universal install_rescue_encrypted@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823771 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210320.n.0): ID: 823494 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_updates URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823494 ID: 823503 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823503 ID: 823520 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823520 ID: 823533 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823533 ID: 823575 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823575 ID: 823576 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_selinux@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823576 ID: 823577 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_service_manipulation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823577 ID: 823578 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823578 ID: 823613 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823613 ID: 823640 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823640 ID: 823655 Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823655 ID: 823656 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823656 ID: 823669 Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823669 ID: 823678 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823678 ID: 823732 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823732 ID: 823733 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823733 ID: 823740 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823740 ID: 823744 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823744 ID: 823768 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823768 ID: 823775 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823775 ID: 823786 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823786 Soft failed openQA tests: 45/126 (aarch64), 70/187 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210320.n.0): ID: 823731 Test: aarch64 universal install_anaconda_text@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823731 ID: 823743 Test: aarch64 universal install_delete_partial@uefi URL: https://o
Fedora-IoT-34-20210321.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 4/16 (x86_64), 2/15 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210319.0): ID: 824147 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824147 ID: 824148 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824148 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210319.0): ID: 824135 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824135 ID: 824143 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824143 ID: 824151 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824151 ID: 824152 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824152 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210319.0): ID: 824137 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824137 Passed openQA tests: 11/16 (x86_64) Skipped non-gating openQA tests: 13 of 31 -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-IoT-35-20210321.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Iot dvd x86_64 Iot dvd aarch64 Failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64), 5/15 (aarch64) Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210320.0): ID: 824112 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824112 ID: 824121 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824121 ID: 824123 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_rpmostree_overlay@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824123 ID: 824128 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824128 ID: 824131 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824131 ID: 824132 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso podman_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824132 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210320.0): ID: 824106 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/824106 Passed openQA tests: 14/16 (x86_64), 10/15 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 34 compose report: 20210321.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-34-20210320.n.1 NEW: Fedora-34-20210321.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 26 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 7.40 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 105.70 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 1015.97 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: clipman-1.5.2-1.fc34 Summary: A simple clipboard manager for Wayland RPMs:clipman golang-github-yory8-clipman-devel Size:6.47 MiB Package: i3blocks-1.5-2.fc34 Summary: A feed generator for text based status bars RPMs:i3blocks Size:200.63 KiB Package: libretls-3.3.1p1-1.fc34 Summary: Port of libtls from LibreSSL to OpenSSL RPMs:libretls libretls-devel libretls-static Size:751.24 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: certbot-1.13.0-1.fc34 Old package: certbot-1.12.0-1.fc34 Summary: A free, automated certificate authority client RPMs: certbot python3-certbot Size: 399.10 KiB Size change: -20 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021 Felix Schwarz - 1.13.0-1 - Update to 1.13.0 (#1934815) Package: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1:1.7.9-1.1lsb3.2.fc34 Old package: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr-1:1.7.7-2.1lsb3.2.fc34 Summary: Drivers for Epson inkjet printers RPMs: epson-inkjet-printer-escpr Size: 19.60 MiB Size change: 271.76 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021 Susi Lehtola - 1:1.7.9-1.1lsb3.2 - Update to 1.7.9. Package: gjs-1.67.3-3.fc34 Old package: gjs-1.67.2-2.fc34 Summary: Javascript Bindings for GNOME RPMs: gjs gjs-devel gjs-tests Size: 3.97 MiB Size change: 69.36 KiB Changelog: * Mon Mar 15 2021 Kalev Lember - 1.67.3-1 - Update to 1.67.3 * Thu Mar 18 2021 Adam Williamson - 1.67.3-2 - Patches to revert MR #585 to work around frequent crash on unlock * Fri Mar 19 2021 Adam Williamson - 1.67.3-3 - Replace MR #585 reversion with MR #588, hopefully correct fix Package: gnome-applets-3.38.0-4.fc34 Old package: gnome-applets-3.38.0-2.fc34 Summary: Small applications for the GNOME Flashback panel RPMs: gnome-applets Size: 39.51 MiB Size change: 602 B Changelog: * Thu Mar 18 2021 Artem Polishchuk - 3.38.0-3 - build: apply upstream patch with port to Tracker 3 * Thu Mar 18 2021 Artem Polishchuk - 3.38.0-4 - build: BR tracker-sparql-3.0 build: Apply upstream patch 3725b0e3 commit style: Trim trailing whitespaces Package: golang-github-google-containerregistry-0.4.1-1.fc34 Old package: golang-github-google-containerregistry-0.4.0-1.fc34 Summary: Go library and CLIs for working with container registries RPMs: golang-github-google-containerregistry golang-github-google-containerregistry-devel Size: 30.22 MiB Size change: 69.19 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021 Olivier Lemasle - 0.4.1-1 - Update to latest upstream 0.4.1 Package: gsi-openssh-8.5p1-1.fc34 Old package: gsi-openssh-8.4p1-4.fc34 Summary: An implementation of the SSH protocol with GSI authentication RPMs: gsi-openssh gsi-openssh-clients gsi-openssh-server Size: 6.67 MiB Size change: 590.04 KiB Changelog: * Tue Mar 02 2021 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek - 8.4p1-4.1 - Rebuilt for updated systemd-rpm-macros See https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2583. * Tue Mar 16 2021 Mattias Ellert - 8.5p1-1 - Based on openssh-8.5p1-1.fc34 - Fix issue with read-only ssh buffer during gssapi key exchange - Add HPN patch Package: mpfr-4.1.0-5.fc34 Old package: mpfr-4.1.0-4.fc34 Summary: C library for multiple-precision floating-point computations RPMs: mpfr mpfr-devel mpfr-doc Size: 1.93 MiB Size change: 931 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 09 2021 Jerry James - 4.1.0-5 - Add upstream patches 8-9 Package: python-acme-1.13.0-1.fc34 Old package: python-acme-1.12.0-1.fc34 Summary: Python library for the ACME protocol RPMs: python-acme-doc python3-acme Size: 295.17 KiB Size change: -742 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021 Felix Schwarz - 1.13.0-1 - Update to 1.13.0 (#1934816) Package: python-certbot-apache-1.13.0-1.fc34 Old package: python-certbot-apache-1.12.0-1.fc34 Summary: The apache plugin for certbot RPMs: python3-certbot-apache Size: 133.17 KiB Size change: -156 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021 Felix Schwarz - 1.13.0-1 - Update to 1.13.0 (#1934811) Package: python-certbot-dns-cloudflare-1.13.0-1.fc34 Old package: python-certbot-dns-cloudflare-1.12.0-1.fc34 Summary: Cloudflare DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot RPMs: python-certbot-dns-cloudflare-doc python3-certbot-dns-cloudflare Size: 184.85 KiB Size change: 43 B Changelog: * Tue Mar 16 2021
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210321.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210320.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210321.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 37 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 606.85 KiB Size of dropped packages:314.83 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 581.36 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 2.82 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker x86_64 Path: Container/x86_64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20210321.n.0.x86_64.tar.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: golang-github-gl-0-0.1.20210320gitbf2b1f2.fc35 Summary: Go bindings for OpenGL RPMs:golang-github-gl-devel Size:376.67 KiB Package: libtracefs-1.0.2-1.fc35 Summary: Library for access kernel tracefs RPMs:libtracefs libtracefs-devel Size:230.18 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: nebula-0.2.3-24.fc34 Summary: Intrusion signature generator RPMs:nebula Size:314.83 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: PyYAML-5.4.1-2.fc35 Old package: PyYAML-5.4.1-2.fc34 Summary: YAML parser and emitter for Python RPMs: python3-pyyaml Size: 947.62 KiB Size change: -415 B Package: abrt-java-connector-1.2.0-5.fc35 Old package: abrt-java-connector-1.2.0-2.fc35 Summary: JNI Agent library converting Java exceptions to ABRT problems RPMs: abrt-java-connector abrt-java-connector-container Size: 397.04 KiB Size change: -887 B Changelog: * Sat Mar 20 2021 Peter Robinson - 1.2.0-5 - Bump for upgrade path from F-33 Package: ceph-2:16.1.0-0.7.snapshot.fc35 Old package: ceph-2:16.1.0-0.5.snapshot.fc35 Summary: User space components of the Ceph file system RPMs: ceph ceph-base ceph-common ceph-fuse ceph-grafana-dashboards ceph-immutable-object-cache ceph-mds ceph-mgr ceph-mgr-cephadm ceph-mgr-dashboard ceph-mgr-diskprediction-local ceph-mgr-k8sevents ceph-mgr-modules-core ceph-mgr-rook ceph-mon ceph-osd ceph-prometheus-alerts ceph-radosgw ceph-resource-agents ceph-selinux ceph-test cephadm cephfs-java cephfs-mirror cephfs-shell cephfs-top libcephfs-devel libcephfs2 libcephfs_jni-devel libcephfs_jni1 librados-devel librados2 libradospp-devel libradosstriper-devel libradosstriper1 librbd-devel librbd1 librgw-devel librgw2 python3-ceph-argparse python3-ceph-common python3-cephfs python3-rados python3-rbd python3-rgw rados-objclass-devel rbd-fuse rbd-mirror rbd-nbd Size: 425.16 MiB Size change: 1.69 MiB Changelog: * Fri Mar 19 2021 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY - 2:16.1.0-0.6.snapshot - 16.1.0 RC (ceph-16.1.0-308-gabe639eb) * Sat Mar 20 2021 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY - 2:16.1.0-0.7.snapshot - 16.1.0 RC (ceph-16.1.0-944-ge53ee8bd) Package: drumstick-2.1.0-1.fc35 Old package: drumstick-2.0.0-2.fc34 Summary: C++/Qt5 wrapper around multiple MIDI interfaces RPMs: drumstick drumstick-devel drumstick-drumgrid drumstick-examples drumstick-guiplayer drumstick-vpiano Size: 22.56 MiB Size change: 228 B Changelog: * Sun Mar 21 2021 Qiyu Yan - 2.1.0-1 - Update to 2.1.0 upstream release Package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-3170.fc35 Old package: dummy-test-package-gloster-0-3159.fc35 Summary: Dummy Test Package called Gloster RPMs: dummy-test-package-gloster Size: 197.75 KiB Size change: 663 B Changelog: * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3160 - rebuilt * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3161 - rebuilt * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3162 - rebuilt * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3163 - rebuilt * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3164 - rebuilt * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3165 - rebuilt * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3166 - rebuilt * Sat Mar 20 2021 packagerbot - 0-3167 - rebuilt * Sun Mar 21 2021 packagerbot - 0-3168 - rebuilt * Sun Mar 21 2021 packagerbot - 0-3169 - rebuilt * Sun Mar 21 2021 packagerbot - 0-3170 - rebuilt Package: foot-1.7.0-1.fc35 Old package: foot-1.6.4-1.fc35 Summary: Fast, lightweight and minimalistic Wayland terminal emulator RPMs: foot foot-terminfo Size: 1.14 MiB Size change: 159.29 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 20 2021 Aleksei Bavshin - 1.7.0-1 - Update to 1.7.0 Package: gnome-games-40.0-1.fc35 Old package: gnome-games-40~rc-1.fc35 Summary: Simple game launcher for GNOME RPMs: gnome-games Size: 4.23 MiB Size change: -4.16 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 20 2021 Artem Polishchuk - 40.0-1 - Update to 40.0 Package: gnome-shell-40.0-1.fc35 Old package: gnome-shell-40.0~rc-1.fc35 Summary: Window management and application launching for GNOME RPMs: gnome-shell Size: 7.98 MiB Size change: 11.54 KiB Changelog: * Sat Mar 20 2021 Florian M??llner - 40.0-1 - Update to 40.0 Package: gnome
Re: libravatar ported to Fedora's AWS
Thank you all for the kind words! clime On Thu, 18 Mar 2021 at 14:49, David Duncan wrote: > > Great News! Much appreciated! > > David Duncan > http://about.me/davdunc > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 9:37 PM Christoph Karl wrote: > > > > Am 14.03.21 um 23:32 schrieb clime: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I have just finished port of libravatar.org service to server provided > > > by Fedora. Big thanks to the Fedora project for sponsoring libravatar. > > > Avatars in pagure.io, src.fp.o, Bodhi should now load much faster. > > > > +1 > > > > Christoph > > ___ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-32-20210321.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210320.0): ID: 823455 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823455 Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210320.0): ID: 823453 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823453 ID: 823460 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823460 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 5/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210321.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210320.0): ID: 823439 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823439 ID: 823446 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/823446 Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
