Re: [Fedora-spins] Introducing Shells to Fedora spins community

2021-03-23 Thread Justin W. Flory 
Hi Zlatan, welcome to the Spins mailing list! It is good to see you
here. Sounds like you are doing interesting work.

Out of curiosity, have you thought of using existing Fedora Spins or
Editions in Shells.com, such as Fedora IoT Edition, Fedora KDE Spin, or
Fedora i3 Spin?

For packaging help and advice, I recommend checking out the Devel
mailing list. This is the largest mailing list in the project where you
will generally find folks who are more familiar with packaging. I CC'd
the list in my reply.

Let us know if you have any questions for us, or if there is anything
you get stuck on. Again, welcome! :)


- jwf


On 3/22/21 5:43 PM, Zlatan Todoric wrote:
>
> Hello to the entire Fedora community!
>
> Shells (shells.com) started in June 2020 from the founders of Private 
> Internet Access (PIA).  Our goal for our desktop as a service is to close the 
> digital divide by bringing different desktops to the masses, enabling 
> developers to test and build better product
s, and providing a new wave of developers the opportunity to explore a 
different approach to the convergence of their desktops and apps.
> Ease of use (reinstallations take a couple of clicks and less than a minute 
> to finish), free backups via snapshots, and high speeds (500Mbps up/down) are 
> already some of the features available through Shells.
>
> We already have several Linux distros available and more are incoming weekly, 
> and we want to have a polished Fedora experience as well. While we have 
> Fedora on the list, we submitted our trademark request and are working 
> through the details and would like to invite you for further collaboration 
> between Fedora and Shells to create a better Fedora experience and 
> potentially even create a spin!
>
> Relevant ticket:
> https://pagure.io/Fedora-Council/tickets/issue/349
>
> Our Github repositories:
> https://github.com/Shells-com
> https://github.com/Shells-com/linux-scripts/blob/master/oscfg/fedora.sh <- 
> current way of building Fedo
ra
>
> As stated per the ticket and conversations, Fedora kernel is a must for it to 
> be accepted for the trademark, and your assistance will be key as we want to 
> ensure a polished experience (i.e. proper management of disk resize and 
> bootloader, packaging shells-helper, and other default packages). We look 
> forward to any helping us maintain the Fedora OS and being a part of our 
> future as we take virtual cloud computing to the next level!  Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Zlatan (Systems Engineer and Project Manager at Shells)
> ___
> spins mailing list -- sp...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to spins-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/sp...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the
list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>

--
Cheers,
Justin W. Flory (he/him)
https://jwf.io
TZ=America/New_York


publickey - foss@jwf.io - 570e854f.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys


signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as a package?

2021-03-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel 
Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> This is the reason why MBROLA is not in Fedora. MBROLA is not new. It is
> much older than the 2-year-old GitHub project. The license of the voices
> has always been the blocker.

PS: This was already discussed when the GitHub project was created in 2019:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/MAAY3B6KUVAV7YRNUSW7G6672WUAFWYJ/
with the same conclusion. (It is not acceptable for Fedora, unfortunately.)

And, a small correction: according to the Wikipedia article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MBROLA
the license of the software itself did actually change from a non-free 
license to the AGPL when the project was imported into GitHub. But 
unfortunately, the license of the data files is still a blocker, sorry.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as a package?

2021-03-23 Thread Neal Gompa 
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:18 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
 wrote:
>
> Marius Schwarz wrote:
> > is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> > a package in a Fedora repo?
>
> The AGPL is acceptable for Fedora, *but*…
>
> > This project is meant:
> >
> > https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> … MBROLA is *not*, because…
>
> > Example license for voices:
> >
> > https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA-voices/blob/master/data/de1/license.txt
>
> … this license is notoriously non-free:
>
> * It allows usage only with MBROLA:
> > Permission is granted to use this database for synthesizing
> > speech with and only with the Mbrola program […]
> AND
> * It forbids charging for the act of distributing, even as part of a larger
>   software distribution such as Fedora:
> > In addition, this database may not be sold or incorporated into
> > any product which is sold without prior permission from the
> > Diphone Database Owner ( engl...@ieee.org ).
> >
> > When no charge is made, this database may be copied and distributed
> > freely, provided that this notice is copied and distributed with it.
>
> and especially the latter restriction disqualifies it even for the non-free
> content / binary firmware exception. Even (non-code) content and firmware
> blobs *MUST* be commercially distributable to be allowed in Fedora.
>
> This is the reason why MBROLA is not in Fedora. MBROLA is not new. It is
> much older than the 2-year-old GitHub project. The license of the voices has
> always been the blocker.
>

Ugh, I missed that part. Whoops. Yeah, Kevin is right and this project
is still not permitted in Fedora.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as a package?

2021-03-23 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel 
Marius Schwarz wrote:
> is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> a package in a Fedora repo?

The AGPL is acceptable for Fedora, *but*…

> This project is meant:
> 
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE

… MBROLA is *not*, because… 

> Example license for voices:
> 
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA-voices/blob/master/data/de1/license.txt

… this license is notoriously non-free:

* It allows usage only with MBROLA:
> Permission is granted to use this database for synthesizing 
> speech with and only with the Mbrola program […]
AND
* It forbids charging for the act of distributing, even as part of a larger
  software distribution such as Fedora:
> In addition, this database may not be sold or incorporated into 
> any product which is sold without prior permission from the 
> Diphone Database Owner ( engl...@ieee.org ).
>
> When no charge is made, this database may be copied and distributed
> freely, provided that this notice is copied and distributed with it.

and especially the latter restriction disqualifies it even for the non-free 
content / binary firmware exception. Even (non-code) content and firmware 
blobs *MUST* be commercially distributable to be allowed in Fedora.

This is the reason why MBROLA is not in Fedora. MBROLA is not new. It is 
much older than the 2-year-old GitHub project. The license of the voices has 
always been the blocker.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as a package?

2021-03-23 Thread Neal Gompa 
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 5:42 PM Marius Schwarz  wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as
> a package in a Fedora repo?
>
> This project is meant:
>
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE
>
> Example license for voices:
>
> https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA-voices/blob/master/data/de1/license.txt
>

Yes: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as a package?

2021-03-23 Thread Marius Schwarz 

hi,

is the license AGPL 3.0 useable in terms of distributing the software as 
a package in a Fedora repo?


This project is meant:

https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA/blob/master/LICENSE

Example license for voices:

https://github.com/numediart/MBROLA-voices/blob/master/data/de1/license.txt

best regards,
Marius Schwarz
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2021-03-24)

2021-03-23 Thread David Cantrell 

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto

or run:
  date -d '2021-03-24 14:00 UTC'


Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at:
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

= Followups =

#2582 F35 Change: rpmautospec - removing release and changelog fields
  from spec files
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2582

= New business =

#2589 Disallow "Block Un-Signed commits" hook in dist-git
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2589

= Open Floor =

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.  The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

--
David Cantrell 
Red Hat, Inc. | Boston, MA | EST5EDT
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2021-03-23 Thread Christopher Engelhard 
On 08.03.21 11:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> php-deepdiver-zipstreamer orphan   0
> weeks ago
> php-opencloud-openstack   orphan   0
> weeks ago

I've taken these, I will need them for nextcloud
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Prioritized bugs and issues

2021-03-23 Thread Ben Cotton 
On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 7:04 AM  wrote:
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>Prioritized bugs and issues on 2021-03-24 from 11:00:00 to 12:00:00 
> America/Indiana/Indianapolis
>At fedora-meet...@irc.freenode.net
> Source: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/calendar/meeting/9788/
>

There is one nominated bug:

* Fibocom L850 is not detected in the system -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1938462

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-34-20210323.n.0 compose check report

2021-03-23 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 10/187 (x86_64), 9/126 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0):

ID: 826340  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826340
ID: 826346  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826346
ID: 826357  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826357
ID: 826360  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826360
ID: 826422  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826422
ID: 826431  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826431
ID: 826448  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826448
ID: 826549  Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826549
ID: 826578  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826578

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0):

ID: 826328  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826328
ID: 826341  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826341
ID: 826463  Test: x86_64 universal install_arabic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826463
ID: 826464  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826464
ID: 826477  Test: x86_64 universal install_cyrillic_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826477
ID: 826486  Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826486
ID: 826540  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826540
ID: 826541  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826541
ID: 826548  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826548
ID: 826552  Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826552

Soft failed openQA tests: 5/187 (x86_64), 6/126 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0):

ID: 826290  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826290
ID: 826315  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826315
ID: 826338  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826338
ID: 826378  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826378
ID: 826379  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826379
ID: 826400  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826400
ID: 826426  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826426
ID: 826439  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826439
ID: 826458  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826458
ID: 826524  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826524
ID: 826575  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826575

Passed openQA tests: 172/187 (x86_64), 104/126 (aarch64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-34-20210322.n.0):

ID: 826310  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826310
ID: 826344  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826344
ID: 826347  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_reboot_unmount
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826347
ID: 826348  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_system_logging
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826348
ID: 826349  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826349
ID: 826350  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826350
ID: 826351  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_selinux
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826351

REMINDER - OUTAGE Scheduled for 2021-03-24 @ 1030 UTC until 2021-03-25 TBD

2021-03-23 Thread Aoife Moloney 
Hi Everyone,

Please note there will be an outage from 1030 UTC tomorrow, Wednesday 24th
March until end of day 25th March (time TBD) to facilitate the deployment
and configuration of the new Fedora Accounts system in production.

In case you missed it, some mails went out on Friday 19th March & an update
on correct dates on Monday 22nd March on what the result of this outage
will mean for you. Read them here in case you missed them
What This Means for You mail (Friday 19th March)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JGVRX7CSXSDJ2MV5TJNYPCGVWWI5XSNB/
Corrected Outage Date mail (Monday 22nd March)
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7GEUB2GY3JROKU3SUEECAC3JUTK7GRRD/

During this outage period the Fedora Accounts team will be working though
configuring all applications and services to connect with the new
applications. You may notice little to no disruption, however during this
period if you do lose abilities within a service or recieve an 'unknown
user' message, please wait for a few minutes to one hour and try again. You
may need to re-sign in with your password.

For any issues that persist, please dont hesitate to reach out to the team
on IRC on #fedora-aaa.

On behalf of the Fedora Accounts team, thank you for your patience and
cooperation during this final stage of the project!


Kindest regards,
Aoife

-- 

Aoife Moloney

Product Owner

Community Platform Engineering Team

Red Hat EMEA 

Communications House

Cork Road

Waterford

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: review request

2021-03-23 Thread Vascom 
Done.

вт, 23 мар. 2021 г. в 17:32, chedi toueiti :
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a trivial python package (re-assert) to review:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362
>
> needed for pre-commit tests.
>
> Happy to review in exchange.
>
> Regards,
>
> --
> Chedi Toueiti
>
> * Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be 
> responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff.
>
> ** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
>
> *** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me 
> and brings me back.
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

review request

2021-03-23 Thread chedi toueiti 
Hi,

I have a trivial python package (re-assert) to review:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1941362

needed for pre-commit tests.

Happy to review in exchange.

Regards,

-- 
*Chedi Toueiti*

* Due to the constant fluctuation in customer personalities, we cannot be
responsible for the mental stability of any one member of our staff.

** My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.

*** I always try to go the extra mile at work, but my boss always finds me
and brings me back.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2021-03-23 Thread Alessio Ciregia 
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> 
> redir orphan   2 weeks ago

While redir (version 2.2.1) [0] is a stale project (as far as I can see), there 
is a new version maintained on GitHub [1].
"Redir was originally created by Sam Creasey and is now developed and 
maintained at GitHub by Joachim Nilsson."

If we assume that this redir 3.x, maintained by Joachim Nilsson is a 
continuation of redir 2.x created by Sam Creasey, that is we haven't a name 
conflict, I can take care of this package.

[0] https://sammy.net/~sammy/hacks
[1] https://github.com/troglobit/redir

Ciao,
A.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora Linux 34 Beta Release Announcement

2021-03-23 Thread Mohan Boddu 
Fedora Linux 34 Beta Released
--

The Fedora Project is pleased to announce the immediate availability
of Fedora 34 Beta, the next step towards our planned Fedora 34 release
at the end of April.

Download the prerelease from our Get Fedora site:
* Get Fedora 34 Beta Workstation: https://getfedora.org/workstation/download/
* Get Fedora 34 Beta Server: https://getfedora.org/server/download/
* Get Fedora 34 IoT: https://getfedora.org/iot/download/

Or, check out one of our popular variants, including KDE Plasma, Xfce,
and other desktop environments, as well as images for ARM devices:

* Get Fedora 34 Beta Spins: https://spins.fedoraproject.org/prerelease
* Get Fedora 34 Beta Labs: https://labs.fedoraproject.org/prerelease
* Get Fedora 34 Beta ARM: https://arm.fedoraproject.org/prerelease

## Beta Release Highlights

* BTRFS transparent compression

* Replacing PulseAudio with PipeWire

* Fedora 34 Workstation Beta includes GNOME 40

* A new i3 spin

* And more ...

For more details about the release, read the full announcement at

* https://fedoramagazine.org/announcing-the-release-of-fedora-34-beta/

or look for the prerelease pages in the download sections at

* https://getfedora.org/

Since this is a Beta release, we expect that you may encounter bugs or
missing features. To report issues encountered during testing, contact
the Fedora QA team via the t...@lists.fedoraproject.org mailing list or
in #fedora-qa on Freenode.

Regards,
Mohan Boddu
Fedora Release Engineering.
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 34 compose report: 20210323.n.0 changes

2021-03-23 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-34-20210322.n.0
NEW: Fedora-34-20210323.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  6
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   44
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  61.08 MiB
Size of dropped packages:14.84 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   442.77 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -40.07 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: fcitx5-mozc-2.17.2102.102.1-1.20210319gitdf9f395.fc34
Summary: A wrapper of mozc for fcitx5
RPMs:fcitx5-mozc
Size:56.92 MiB

Package: golang-github-gdamore-tcell-2-2.2.0-1.fc34
Summary: Alternate terminal package
RPMs:golang-github-gdamore-tcell-2 golang-github-gdamore-tcell-2-devel
Size:3.80 MiB

Package: human-theme-gtk-1.1.0-1.fc34
Summary: Human theme for GTK
RPMs:human-theme-gtk
Size:72.84 KiB

Package: python-docs-theme-2020.12-1.fc34
Summary: The Sphinx theme for the CPython docs and related projects
RPMs:python3-docs-theme
Size:18.59 KiB

Package: rubygem-pastel-0.8.0-1.fc34
Summary: Terminal strings styling with intuitive and clean API
RPMs:rubygem-pastel rubygem-pastel-doc
Size:259.00 KiB

Package: rubygem-sugarjar-0.0.9-4.fc34
Summary: A git/github helper utility
RPMs:sugarjar
Size:26.68 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: libhandy1-1.1.90-1.fc34
Summary: Building blocks for modern adaptive GNOME apps
RPMs:libhandy1 libhandy1-devel
Size:4.04 MiB

Package: plasma-pk-updates-0.3.2-9.fc34
Summary: Plasma applet for system updates using PackageKit
RPMs:plasma-pk-updates
Size:1.26 MiB

Package: tracker3-3.1.0~rc-1.fc34
Summary: Desktop-neutral metadata database and search tool
RPMs:libtracker-sparql3 tracker3 tracker3-devel tracker3-doc
Size:5.04 MiB

Package: tracker3-miners-3.1.0~rc-1.fc34
Summary: Tracker miners and metadata extractors
RPMs:tracker3-miners
Size:4.49 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  CGAL-5.2.1-1.fc34
Old package:  CGAL-5.2-2.fc34
Summary:  Computational Geometry Algorithms Library
RPMs: CGAL-demos-source CGAL-devel CGAL-qt5-devel
Size: 119.85 MiB
Size change:  -62.08 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Mar 17 2021 Laurent Rineau  - 5.2.1-1
  - New upstream release


Package:  bottles-3.1.0-1.fc34
Old package:  bottles-3.0.6-1.fc34
Summary:  Easily manage Wine prefix in a new way
RPMs: bottles
Size: 122.15 KiB
Size change:  11.25 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Mar 08 2021 Artem Polishchuk  - 3.0.8-1
  - build(update): 3.0.8

  * Sat Mar 13 2021 Artem Polishchuk  - 3.0.9-1
  - build(update): 3.0.9

  * Fri Mar 19 2021 Artem Polishchuk  - 3.1.0-1
  - build(update): 3.1.0


Package:  clipit-1.4.5-1.fc34
Old package:  clipit-1.4.4-9.fc34
Summary:  A lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager
RPMs: clipit
Size: 443.90 KiB
Size change:  22.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Mar 19 2021 Mamoru TASAKA  - 1.4.5-1
  - 1.4.5


Package:  cscope-15.9-10.fc34
Old package:  cscope-15.9-9.fc34
Summary:  C source code tree search and browse tool
RPMs: cscope
Size: 1.43 MiB
Size change:  354.88 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Mar 16 2021 Vladis Dronov  - 15.9-10
  - Bring in important patches from the upstream (39fb38..eaea31 in a git repo)
  - Fix the upstream tarball URL
  - Remove outdated patch files


Package:  dnf-4.6.1-1.fc34
Old package:  dnf-4.6.0-1.fc34
Summary:  Package manager
RPMs: dnf dnf-automatic dnf-data python3-dnf yum
Size: 999.93 KiB
Size change:  3.94 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Mar 02 2021 Nicola Sella  - 4.6.1-1
  - Update to 4.6.1
  - Fix recreate script
  - Add unit test for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache (RhBug:1865803)
  - Add docs and examples for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache (RhBug:1865803)
  - [spec] remove python2 support
  - Remove problematic language
  - The noroot plugin no longer exists, remove mention
  - Run tests for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache in installroot (RhBug:1865803)
  - expand history to full term size when output is redirected (RhBug:1852577) 
(RhBug:1852577,1906970)
  - [doc] Fix: "sslcacert" contains path to the file
  - [doc] Added proxy ssl configuration options, increase libdnf require
  - Set persistdir and substitutions for fill_sack_from_repos_in_cache tests 
(RhBug:1865803)
  - Update documentation for module_obsoletes and module_stream_switch
  - print additional information when verifying GPG key using DNS
  - Bugs fixed (RhBug:1897573)
  - Remove hardcoded logfile permissions (RhBug:1910084)
  - Enhanced detection of plugins removed in transaction (RhBug:1929163)


Package:  fedora-obsolete-packages-34-18
Old package:  fedora-obsolete-packages-34-17
Summary:  A package to obsolete retired packages
RPMs: fedora-obsolete-packages
Size: 34.99 KiB
Size change:  -59 B
Changelog:
  * Fri M

Re: Fedora 33 fails upgrade for rcm-tools-fedora-rpms

2021-03-23 Thread Carol Bouchard 
This is possible.  I've been having issues with my laptop and booted a
number of times.  I am fine now. TY

Carol

On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 7:49 PM Peter Robinson  wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 11:34 PM Carol Bouchard 
> wrote:
> >
> > I saw this error just before my upgrade to fedora33 and I'm now seeing
> it after the
> > upgrade.  How do I fix this since I need brew to work?
>
> Given it can't resolve the host I'm guessing you're not on the VPN, or
> else it's not querying the DNS servers provided by the VPN for
> internal hosts.
>
> > Before Upgrade:
> > CM Tools for Fedora 33 (RPMs)  0.0  B/s |   0  B
>  00:00
> > Errors during downloading metadata for repository
> 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms':
> >   - Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for
> https://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RCMTOOLS/latest-RCMTOOLS-2-F-33/compose/Everything/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml
> [Could not resolve host: download.devel.redhat.com]
> > Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms':
> Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All
> mirrors were tried
> > Ignoring repositories: rcm-tools-fedora-rpms
> >
> > After Upgrade:
> > $sudo yum install brew
> > [sudo] password for cbouchar:
> > RCM Tools for Fedora 33 (RPMs)
>   0.0  B/s |   0  B 00:00
> > Errors during downloading metadata for repository
> 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms':
> >   - Curl error (6): Couldn't resolve host name for
> https://download.devel.redhat.com/rel-eng/RCMTOOLS/latest-RCMTOOLS-2-F-33/compose/Everything/x86_64/os/repodata/repomd.xml
> [Could not resolve host: download.devel.redhat.com]
> > Error: Failed to download metadata for repo 'rcm-tools-fedora-rpms':
> Cannot download repomd.xml: Cannot download repodata/repomd.xml: All
> mirrors were tried
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-32-20210323.0 compose check report

2021-03-23 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-32-20210322.0):

ID: 826137  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826137
ID: 826144  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826144

Passed openQA tests: 6/7 (x86_64), 6/7 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F35 Change: "Fedora Linux" in /etc/os-release

2021-03-23 Thread José Abílio Matos 
On Tuesday, March 23, 2021 1:40:11 AM WET Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Please keep in mind that Linus Torvalds himself announced his project with
> the words: "It is NOT protable" [sic] "(uses 386 task switching etc),". [1]
> The portability came much later, after major changes (such as rewriting
> assembly code in C or making it selectable by platform). So it is not fair
> to blame the FSF for not believing in the portability of Linux (the kernel)
> at the very beginning. Nobody did, not even Linus himself.
> 
> [1]
> https://groups.google.com/g/comp.os.minix/c/dlNtH7RRrGA/m/SwRavCzVE7gJ?pli=
> 1
> 
> Kevin Kofler

Yes, but by 1994 when linux was ported to the DEC Alpha you could see that 
things were changing. So the much later is not much later than that. :-)

I have fond memories of one of those machines where running Linux there made 
all the difference. :-)

The only issue that we had was that with linux 2 the network driver, a Tulip, 
was removed from the kernel. OK, I could have swapped the network driver, but 
by that time it was not worth anymore. :-)

-- 
José Abílio

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210323.0 compose check report

2021-03-23 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 1/7 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210322.0):

ID: 826126  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_update_cli@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826126

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/7 (x86_64), 1/7 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210322.0):

ID: 826123  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826123
ID: 826130  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826130

Passed openQA tests: 5/7 (aarch64), 6/7 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210322.0):

ID: 826125  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_system_logging@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/826125
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure