Why can't I push to a module branch?

2021-09-13 Thread Orion Poplawski 

(base) [orion@vmrawhide-rufous openmpi (4.0)]$ git push
Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0), pack-reused 0
remote: Branch refs/heads/4.0 is unsupported
remote: Denied push for ref 'refs/heads/4.0' for user 'orion'
remote: All changes have been rejected
To ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openmpi
 ! [remote rejected] 4.0 -> 4.0 (pre-receive hook declined)
error: failed to push some refs to 
'ssh://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openmpi'



--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems  720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Package deletion notifications are unparsable

2021-09-13 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade 
On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 19:19, Kevin Fenzi  wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:56:45AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > > I see the following in my Fedora Notifications Digest
> > >
> > > Digest Summary:
> > > 1.  qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted
> > > ...
> > > ---
> > >
> > > (2021-09-11 09:56:50 UTC) qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted
> > > - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1732298
> > >
> > > Unparsable message details
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > I don't know what should be there, but it should probably not be 
> > > unparsable.
> >
> > On the more general point, has anyone at any time ever found these
> > notifications to be useful?  Or actionable (they happen _after_ the
> > build has been deleted, so not very helpful!)
>
> Yeah, perhaps we should drop them, I agree there's not much to do once
> something is already deleted.
>
> There should be a message much eariler when they are untagged from the
> trash tag that actually is useful (you can re-tag them to avoid the
> process continuing).
>

Yes, that message comes through directly from koji, I think? At least,
I don't recall anything on the notifications.

> kevin

-- 
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Package deletion notifications are unparsable

2021-09-13 Thread Kevin Fenzi 
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:09:39AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:56:45AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > I see the following in my Fedora Notifications Digest
> > 
> > Digest Summary:
> > 1.  qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted
> > ...
> > ---
> > 
> > (2021-09-11 09:56:50 UTC) qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted
> > - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1732298
> > 
> > Unparsable message details
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > I don't know what should be there, but it should probably not be unparsable.
> 
> On the more general point, has anyone at any time ever found these
> notifications to be useful?  Or actionable (they happen _after_ the
> build has been deleted, so not very helpful!)

Yeah, perhaps we should drop them, I agree there's not much to do once
something is already deleted.

There should be a message much eariler when they are untagged from the
trash tag that actually is useful (you can re-tag them to avoid the
process continuing). 

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

No FESCo Meeting today (2021-09-13)

2021-09-13 Thread Neal Gompa 
There is nothing on the agenda, so I'm canceling this week's meeting.
I'll pick this up again next week if we have anything.


-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-35-20210913.n.0 compose check report

2021-09-13 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 10/141 (aarch64), 9/205 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979891  Test: aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979891
ID: 979900  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979900
ID: 980018  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980018
ID: 980040  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980040
ID: 980049  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_minimal_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980049
ID: 980061  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_user_creation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980061
ID: 980074  Test: aarch64 universal support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980074
ID: 980081  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980081
ID: 980100  Test: aarch64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980100

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-35-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979797  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979797
ID: 979831  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979831
ID: 979833  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979833
ID: 979845  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979845
ID: 979847  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979847
ID: 979924  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979924
ID: 979935  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979935
ID: 979952  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979952
ID: 980017  Test: x86_64 universal memtest
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980017
ID: 980086  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/980086

Soft failed openQA tests: 19/205 (x86_64), 14/141 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-35-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979866  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979866

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-35-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979755  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979755
ID: 979756  Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979756
ID: 979775  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979775
ID: 979778  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979778
ID: 979794  Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979794
ID: 979817  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979817
ID: 979818  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979818
ID: 979838  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979838
ID: 979861  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979861
ID: 979862  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979862
ID: 979867  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979867
ID: 979877  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979877
ID: 979882  Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979882
ID: 979909  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979909
ID: 979928  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979928
ID: 979939  Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979939
ID: 979948  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979948
ID: 979970  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://op

Fedora-Rawhide-20210913.n.0 compose check report

2021-09-13 Thread Fedora compose checker 
Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud

Failed openQA tests: 8/207 (x86_64), 16/141 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979399  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979399
ID: 979426  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979426
ID: 979464  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979464
ID: 979469  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_resize_lvm@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979469
ID: 979475  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_updates_nfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979475
ID: 979520  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979520
ID: 979527  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz evince@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979527
ID: 979529  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979529
ID: 979532  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
desktop_update_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979532
ID: 979622  Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979622
ID: 979628  Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979628
ID: 979634  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979634
ID: 979640  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979640
ID: 979649  Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979649
ID: 979658  Test: aarch64 universal install_kickstart_firewall_disabled@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979658

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979387  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979387
ID: 979411  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979411
ID: 979413  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_postinstall
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979413
ID: 979418  Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979418
ID: 979503  Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979503
ID: 979585  Test: x86_64 universal memtest
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979585
ID: 979592  Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979592
ID: 979624  Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979624
ID: 979654  Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979654

Soft failed openQA tests: 8/141 (aarch64), 11/207 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979516  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979516
ID: 979522  Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979522
ID: 979586  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979586
ID: 979608  Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979608

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210912.n.0):

ID: 979383  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979383
ID: 979384  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979384
ID: 979404  Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979404
ID: 979427  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979427
ID: 979428  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979428
ID: 979432  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979432
ID: 979433  Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979433
ID: 979442  Test: x86_64

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

2021-09-13 Thread Jhordy M. Caceres Guerra 
Hello!

I'm new here, but I would like to be part of this group, I have a little 
knowledge of Java and I think I can be helpful for the group's goals.

Note: I know this thread is old, but I didn't know how to join this group, 
because this group has no sponsors.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora 35 compose report: 20210913.n.0 changes

2021-09-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-35-20210912.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210913.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   0
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   0 B
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: 
Silverblue/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-aarch64-35-20210912.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =

= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210913.n.0 changes

2021-09-13 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report 
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210912.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210913.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   89
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   563.08 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -85.89 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  ModemManager-1.18.0-1.fc36
Old package:  ModemManager-1.17.900-1.fc36
Summary:  Mobile broadband modem management service
RPMs: ModemManager ModemManager-devel ModemManager-glib 
ModemManager-glib-devel ModemManager-vala
Size: 12.42 MiB
Size change:  81.10 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Peter Robinson  - 1.18.0-1
  - Update to 1.18.0


Package:  Thunar-4.16.9-2.fc36
Old package:  Thunar-4.16.8-2.fc35
Summary:  Thunar File Manager
RPMs: Thunar Thunar-devel Thunar-docs
Size: 10.03 MiB
Size change:  -24.96 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Mukundan Ragavan  - 4.16.9-1
  - Update to 4.16.9

  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Mukundan Ragavan  - 4.16.9-2
  - Drop dep on dbus-x11 (fixes bz#1975572)


Package:  alembic-1.8.3-1.fc36
Old package:  alembic-1.8.2-1.fc36.4
Summary:  Open framework for storing and sharing scene data
RPMs: alembic alembic-devel alembic-libs
Size: 5.45 MiB
Size change:  4.09 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Luya Tshimbalanga  - 1.8.3-1
  - Update to 1.8.3


Package:  alligator-21.08-2.fc36
Old package:  alligator-21.06-2.fc35
Summary:  Kirigami-based RSS reader
RPMs: alligator
Size: 654.15 KiB
Size change:  447 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Onuralp SEZER  - 21.08-1
  - 21.08

  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Onuralp SEZER  - 21.08-2
  - Source1 removed


Package:  bleachbit-4.4.0-1.fc36
Old package:  bleachbit-4.2.0-4.fc35
Summary:  Remove sensitive data and free up disk space
RPMs: bleachbit
Size: 621.11 KiB
Size change:  29.37 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 13 2021 Audrey Toskin  - 4.4.0-1
  - Bump to upstream version 4.4.0, with upstream enhancements documented
here: https://www.bleachbit.org/news/bleachbit-440


Package:  blender-1:2.93.4-2.fc36
Old package:  blender-1:2.93.4-1.fc36
Summary:  3D modeling, animation, rendering and post-production
RPMs: blender blender-rpm-macros
Size: 134.44 MiB
Size change:  21.43 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Luya Tshimbalanga  1:2.93.4-2
  - Rebuild for alembic 1.8.3


Package:  conda-4.10.3-1.fc36
Old package:  conda-4.10.1-3.fc35
Summary:  Cross-platform, Python-agnostic binary package manager
RPMs: conda python3-conda
Size: 956.78 KiB
Size change:  124.03 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek  4.10.3-1
  - Version 4.10.3 (#1977150)


Package:  diffoscope-183-1.fc36
Old package:  diffoscope-174-3.fc35
Summary:  In-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories
RPMs: diffoscope
Size: 339.81 KiB
Size change:  9.02 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Zbigniew J??drzejewski-Szmek  183-1
  - Version 183


Package:  dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.13-1.fc36
Old package:  dovecot-fts-xapian-1.4.12-1.fc36
Summary:  Dovecot FTS plugin based on Xapian
RPMs: dovecot-fts-xapian
Size: 255.24 KiB
Size change:  1.50 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Joan Moreau  - 1.4.13-1
  - Rebuild for dovecot 2.3.16
  - Epel7 comptability


Package:  emacs-json-mode-1.7.0-8.fc36
Old package:  emacs-json-mode-1.7.0-7.fc35
Summary:  Major mode for editing JSON files with Emacs
RPMs: emacs-json-mode
Size: 11.44 KiB
Size change:  -32 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Mohamed El Morabity  - 
1.7.0-8
  - Update autostart file


Package:  emacs-json-reformat-0.0.6-8.fc36
Old package:  emacs-json-reformat-0.0.6-7.fc35
Summary:  Reformatting tool for JSON
RPMs: emacs-json-reformat
Size: 12.83 KiB
Size change:  241 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Mohamed El Morabity  - 
0.0.6-8
  - Add autoload file


Package:  emacs-json-snatcher-1.0.0-8.fc36
Old package:  emacs-json-snatcher-1.0.0-7.fc35
Summary:  Get the path to a JSON element in Emacs
RPMs: emacs-json-snatcher
Size: 14.59 KiB
Size change:  205 B
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Mohamed El Morabity  - 
1.0.0-8
  - Add autoload file


Package:  environment-modules-5.0.0-1.fc36
Old package:  environment-modules-5.0.0-0.1.alpha.fc35
Summary:  Provides dynamic modification of a user's environment
RPMs: environment-modules
Size: 2.34 MiB
Size change:  87.51 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Sep 12 2021 Xavier Delaruelle  - 5.0.0-1
  - Update to 5.0.0
  - Configuration guide example.txt is replaced by more up to date INSTAL

Re: Claiming ownership for gtg and pyhton-liblarch

2021-09-13 Thread Sérgio Basto 
oops, I wanted to send the previous message just to the author ,
message can be ignored 

On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:19 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> 
> Olá , convido-te para te juntatres ao matrix chat
> ( https://app.element.io/#/room/#fedora-br:libera.chat 
> 
> #fedora-br no libera.chat  
> 
> On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 22:37 -0300, Miguel R. Araújo wrote:
> 
> 
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project
> /code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guideli
> nes
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@l
> ists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedor
> a-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Claiming ownership for gtg and pyhton-liblarch

2021-09-13 Thread Sérgio Basto 

Olá , convido-te para te juntatres ao matrix chat
( https://app.element.io/#/room/#fedora-br:libera.chat 

#fedora-br no libera.chat  

On Sun, 2021-09-12 at 22:37 -0300, Miguel R. Araújo wrote:
> I still need someone to sponsor me into the packager group to be able
> to maintain these packages. But if I can find someone, I would be
> glad if you would help me as a co-maintainer.
> FAS: miguel7ra
> 
> On Mon, Sep 13 2021 at 01:11:36 AM -, Thomas Vandal
>  wrote:
> > Hi Miguel,
> > 
> > I'd be happy help as a co-maintainer for these two packages if you
> > are looking for one. I am new to packaging software for Fedora, but
> > GTG is one of the applications I use and would like to see in the
> > repos as well. I plan to look more into how to package python
> > software later this week.
> > 
> > Best,
> > 
> > Thomas Vandal
> > 
> > 
> > > Hello.
> > > 
> > > The gtg package was retired 3 years ago because of inactive
> > > upstream, 
> > > but it's been active for a while so I'd like to maintain it. To
> > > do 
> > > this, I need to become the owner of the "gtg" package and the 
> > > "python-liblarch" package, which is a dependency of "gtg" and was
> > > also
> > > 
> > > retired because of inactive upstream, but has returned to
> > > activity 
> > > along with gtg.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for your attention.
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines:
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives:
> >
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

2021-09-13 Thread Sérgio Basto 
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 12:28 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 13. 09. 21 12:16, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > While python 3.10 is not officially released Expected: 3.10.0 final:
> > Monday, 
> > 2021-10-04 ( https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0619/ 
> >  )  , it's rare upstreams
> > to fix 
> > their projects.
> 
> Neither of the two listed bugs is a Python 3.10 related problem:
> 
> clufter fails with: No matching package to install: 'jing'
> libunity fails with: protocol-icon.vala:188.3-188.27: error: overriding
> method
> 
> The "compatibility of their packages with Python 3.10" was an
> unfortunate 
> expression: We need to rebuild the packages with Python 3.10 but we
> cannot.
> 

OK , sorry, is VirtualBox that gives me lots of work to support python
that is not yet release, but seems nobody need Python-virtualbox in
rawhide and F35 hopefully 

About Rex you can see that he is very active in bodhi 
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/users/rdieter

> -- 
> Miro Hrončok

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F35 3x slower boot than F34

2021-09-13 Thread Zdenek Pytela 
On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 6:40 PM Chris Murphy 
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 2:11 AM Marius Schwarz 
> wrote:
> >
> > Am 03.09.21 um 18:51 schrieb Chris Murphy:
> > > Bug 2001057 - F35 boots 3x slower than F34, large time gaps in systemd
> journal
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001057
> > >
> > >
> > > This one really has gotten my goat. I'm not finding any reason why
> > > it's taking this long to boot. Usually the critica-chain or svg plot
> > > exposes the culprit but not in this case, I just have multiple 10s+
> > > gaps in the journal.
> > >
> > > I might have to do some tedious regression testing by doing a clean
> > > install of 35 to see if it's some artifact of upgrading from 34. But
> > > it'd be nicer if I can just directly expose the culprit(s).
> > >
> > >
> > Any updates on this?
>
> It's an selinux issue. Fixed in Rawhide, waiting for an F35 build and
> then testing it. Interesting to note that there's such a thing as user
> AVCs and I guess (?) those don't show up in the journal with system
> AVCs. That might be why I never saw why the problem work around was
> enforcing=0.
>
There also is a selinux-policy F35 build available since Friday, but is it
not a part of the latest 20210912 compose. Still a few more problems need
to be addressed, there will be a new build soon.



>
> --
> Chris Murphy
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>


-- 

Zdenek Pytela
Security SELinux team
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Open NeuroFedora meeting today (13th Sep) at 1300 UTC(Was: Re: [NeuroFedora] Re: 1 of 32,125 Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1300 UTC on Monday, 12th September)

2021-09-13 Thread Ankur Sinha 
On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 15:27:34 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Hey!
> 
> Should it not be 13th September if its on Monday 12th September is tomorrow
> Sunday fyi

+1,

Thanks for that.

Just to clarify: the meeting is today at 1300 UTC, and you can join us
over IRC/Matrix:

IRC:
https://webchat.libera.chat/?channels=#fedora-neuro

Matrix: https://tinyurl.com/matrix-neurofedora

See you all there!

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Test-Announce] GNOME 41 Test Week is underway

2021-09-13 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee 
Hey folks,

We have the GNOME 41 test week happening now and as we ramp towards
Beta candidate release, having all the right bugs raised and taken
care to will go a long way!
If you have some spare time, you can contribute to the ongoing test
week[0] and post your results[1]

As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-...@libera.chat
for question and discussion.

[0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-09-09_Fedora_35_GNOME_41
[1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/118



-- 
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Test-Announce] [Test Week] Fedora Linux Kernel 5.14 2021-09-12 through 2021-09-19

2021-09-13 Thread Sumantro Mukherjee 
Hey All,

I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 5.14
Test week is happening from 2021-09-12 to 2021-09-19. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.

As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-...@libera.chat
for question and
discussion.


[0] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2021-09-12_Kernel_5.14_Test_Week
[1] https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/119


-- 
//sumantro
Fedora QE
TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

2021-09-13 Thread Miro Hrončok 

On 13. 09. 21 12:16, Sérgio Basto wrote:
While python 3.10 is not officially released Expected: 3.10.0 final: Monday, 
2021-10-04 ( https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0619/ 
 )  , it's rare upstreams to fix 
their projects.


Neither of the two listed bugs is a Python 3.10 related problem:

clufter fails with: No matching package to install: 'jing'
libunity fails with: protocol-icon.vala:188.3-188.27: error: overriding method

The "compatibility of their packages with Python 3.10" was an unfortunate 
expression: We need to rebuild the packages with Python 3.10 but we cannot.


--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

2021-09-13 Thread Sérgio Basto 
On Mon, 2021-09-13 at 11:44 +0200, Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> does anybody know how to contact jpokorny and rdieter? They are not
> responding to bugzillas regarding the compatibility of their packages
> with Python 3.10. 
> 
> Nonresponsive maintainer bug for jpokorny:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003596
> clufter bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902704
> 
> Nonresponsive maintainer bug for rdieter:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003599
> libunity bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951440
> 
> This is the first step (Week 0) of Fedora Nonresponsive package
> maintainer policy[0].  
> [0]
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/

While python 3.10 is not officially released Expected: 3.10.0 final:
Monday, 2021-10-04 ( https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0619/ )  ,
it's rare upstreams to fix their projects.

Rex 


> Tomas
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Nonresponsive maintainer check for Jan Pokorny and Rex Dieter

2021-09-13 Thread Tomas Hrnciar 
Hello,

does anybody know how to contact jpokorny and rdieter? They are not
responding to bugzillas regarding the compatibility of their packages with
Python 3.10.

Nonresponsive maintainer bug for jpokorny:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003596
clufter bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1902704

Nonresponsive maintainer bug for rdieter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003599
libunity bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1951440

This is the first step (Week 0) of Fedora Nonresponsive package maintainer
policy[0].
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers/

Tomas
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-34-20210913.0 compose check report

2021-09-13 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210912.0):

ID: 979249  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979249
ID: 979259  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979259

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Test-Announce] 2021-09-13 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting

2021-09-13 Thread Petr Pisar 
V Sun, Sep 12, 2021 at 12:18:49AM +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko napsal(a):
> On Sun, 12 Sept 2021 at 00:02, Geoffrey Marr  wrote:
> 
> > # F35 Blocker Review meeting
> > # Date: 2021-09-13
> > # Time: 16:00 UTC
> > # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat
> >
> > Hello testers!
> >
> > There are currently 6 proposed freeze exceptions to be looked at during
> > the meeting. We will also spend some time looking over the existing 6
> > accepted blockers and 6 accepted freeze exceptions.
> >
> 
> After recent gcc changes it seems like some packages may no longer compile.
> First example from the edge a2ps
> 
> make[3]: Entering directory '/home/tkloczko/rpmbuild/BUILD/a2ps-4.14/lib'
> /bin/sh ../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=compile /usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DSYSCONFFILE=\"/etc/a2ps.cfg\" -I. -I..
> -I.. -I../intl -I.-O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
> -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
> -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -flto=auto -flto-partition=none  -c -o
> fonts.lo fonts.c
> libtool: compile:  /usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DSYSCONFFILE=\"/etc/a2ps.cfg\" -I. -I..
> -I.. -I../intl -I. -O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
> -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
> -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -flto=auto -flto-partition=none -c
> fonts.c -o fonts.o
> fonts.c:1700:16: warning: ‘input’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  1700 | #else
>   |^
> fonts.c:1653:17: warning: ‘yyunput’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
>  1653 |
>   | ^
> /bin/sh ../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=compile /usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DSYSCONFFILE=\"/etc/a2ps.cfg\" -I. -I..
> -I.. -I../intl -I.-O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
> -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
> -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -flto=auto -flto-partition=none  -c -o
> path-concat.lo path-concat.c
> libtool: compile:  /usr/bin/gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H
> -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DSYSCONFFILE=\"/etc/a2ps.cfg\" -I. -I..
> -I.. -I../intl -I. -O2 -g -grecord-gcc-switches -pipe -Wall
> -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-cc1 -fstack-protector-strong
> -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-annobin-cc1 -m64 -mtune=generic
> -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -fstack-clash-protection -fcf-protection
> -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections -flto=auto -flto-partition=none -c
> path-concat.c -o path-concat.o
> path-concat.c:25:29: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘void’
>25 | # define mempcpy(D, S, N) ((void *) ((char *) memcpy (D, S, N) +
> (N)))
>   | ^~~~
> path-concat.c:25:37: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘(’ token
>25 | # define mempcpy(D, S, N) ((void *) ((char *) memcpy (D, S, N) +
> (N)))
>   | ^
> In file included from /usr/include/features.h:488,
>  from /usr/include/bits/libc-header-start.h:33,
>  from /usr/include/stdio.h:27,
>  from path-concat.c:28:
> path-concat.c:25:29: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘void’
>25 | # define mempcpy(D, S, N) ((void *) ((char *) memcpy (D, S, N) +
> (N)))
>   | ^~~~
> path-concat.c:25:37: error: expected ‘)’ before ‘(’ token
>25 | # define mempcpy(D, S, N) ((void *) ((char *) memcpy (D, S, N) +
> (N)))
>   | ^
> make[3]: *** [Makefile:763: path-concat.lo] Error 1
> 
> 
> Last time this package was rebuilt ~2 months ago and probably many more
> like this one are still not exposed.
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=180
> 
I cannot reproduce it. I have gcc-11.2.1-1.fc35.x86_64 which is latest
according to Koji and all other packages up-to-date (including updates from
Koji build root). I tried in F36 as well as in F35.

-- Petr


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedora

Re: Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

2021-09-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones 
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 09:46:25AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:13:32AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> > On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 04:10, Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The build finished last night:
> > >
> > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1830840
> > >
> > > but is still not available to build against (8+ hours later).
> > 
> > Isn't that because the gating tests failed to run?
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2b69d61d79
> 
> I didn't know any tests were required?

I clicked the "retest" button and a Bodhi update got created a few
minutes later.  So that was something to do with the problem.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and
build Windows installers. Over 100 libraries supported.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

2021-09-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones 
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 04:13:32AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 04:10, Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
> >
> >
> > The build finished last night:
> >
> > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1830840
> >
> > but is still not available to build against (8+ hours later).
> 
> Isn't that because the gating tests failed to run?
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2b69d61d79

I didn't know any tests were required?

Anyway I looked at the "Jenkins" page and it's unintelligible.
If tests are required we should use a system that provides test
results ordinary people can understand.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

2021-09-13 Thread Elliott Sales de Andrade 
On Mon, 13 Sept 2021 at 04:10, Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:
>
>
> The build finished last night:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1830840
>
> but is still not available to build against (8+ hours later).

Isn't that because the gating tests failed to run?
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-2b69d61d79

>
> Rich.
>

-- 
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Some delay with Rawhide builds getting to the buildroot?

2021-09-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones 

The build finished last night:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1830840

but is still not available to build against (8+ hours later).

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any
software inside the virtual machine.  Supports Linux and Windows.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Package deletion notifications are unparsable

2021-09-13 Thread Richard W.M. Jones 
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 12:56:45AM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> I see the following in my Fedora Notifications Digest
> 
> Digest Summary:
> 1.  qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted
> ...
> ---
> 
> (2021-09-11 09:56:50 UTC) qulogic's visidata-2.3-1.fc35 was deleted
> - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1732298
> 
> Unparsable message details
> 
> ---
> 
> I don't know what should be there, but it should probably not be unparsable.

On the more general point, has anyone at any time ever found these
notifications to be useful?  Or actionable (they happen _after_ the
build has been deleted, so not very helpful!)

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines.  Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Orphaning rubygems packages

2021-09-13 Thread Pavel Valena 
I am these packages, as I have no use for them:

- rubygem-cliver
- rubygem-ancestry
- rubygem-gem-patch
- rubygem-scoped_search

Regards,
Pavel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Cloud-33-20210913.0 compose check report

2021-09-13 Thread Fedora compose checker 
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210912.0):

ID: 979117  Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979117
ID: 979127  Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/979127

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure