[Bug 2007812] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812 Bug ID: 2007812 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.48 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Latest upstream release: 2.48 Current version/release in rawhide: 2.47-4.fc35 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/DateTime-TimeZone/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/2801/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007812 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] 2021-09-27 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 35 Blocker Review Meeting
# F35 Blocker Review meeting # Date: 2021-09-27 # Time: 16:00 UTC # Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.libera.chat Hi folks! We have 9 proposed Final blockers to review, so let's have a review meeting on Monday. If you have time this weekend, you can take a look at the proposed or accepted blockers before the meeting - the full lists can be found here: https://qa.fedoraproject.org/blockerbugs/ . Remember, you can also now vote on bugs outside of review meetings! If you look at the bug list in the blockerbugs app, you'll see links labeled "Vote!" next to all proposed blockers and freeze exceptions. Those links take you to tickets where you can vote. https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/blocker-review has instructions on how exactly you do it. We usually go through the tickets shortly before the meeting and apply any clear votes, so the meeting will just cover bugs where there wasn't a clear outcome in the ticket voting yet. **THIS MEANS IF YOU VOTE NOW, THE MEETING WILL BE SHORTER!** We'll be evaluating these bugs to see if they violate any of the Release Criteria and warrant the blocking of a release if they're not fixed. Information on the release criteria for F35 can be found on the wiki [0]. For more information about the Blocker and Freeze exception process, check out these links: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process And for those of you who are curious how a Blocker Review Meeting works - or how it's supposed to go and you want to run one - check out the SOP on the wiki: - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting Have a good weekend and see you on Monday! [0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Test-Announce] 2021-09-27 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
# Fedora Quality Assurance Meeting # Date: 2021-09-27 # Time: 15:00 UTC (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto) # Location: #fedora-meeting on irc.libera.chat Greetings testers! Fedora 35 Beta comes out next week, so let's check in and make sure we're prepared. If anyone has any other items for the agenda, please reply to this email and suggest them! Thanks. == Proposed Agenda Topics == 1. Previous meeting follow-up 2. Fedora 35 status 3. Test Day / community event status 4. Open floor -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha https://www.happyassassin.net ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1998176] perl-File-Find-Object-0.3.6 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998176 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-File-Find-Object-0.3.6 |perl-File-Find-Object-0.3.6 |-1.fc36 |-1.fc36 ||perl-File-Find-Object-0.3.6 ||-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:13:26 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-b14a374078 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998176 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
7 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-f005e1b879
debmirror-2.35-1.el7
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-2f9b2cf4af
ckeditor-4.16.2-1.el7
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d179a438bc
libspf2-1.2.11-1.20210922git4915c308.el7
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2021-37f81a6244
golang-github-prometheus-2.26.1-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
openbgpd-7.2-1.el7
rpki-client-7.3-1.el7
Details about builds:
openbgpd-7.2-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-d380aed307)
OpenBGPD Routing Daemon
Update Information:
OpenBGPD 7.2 This release includes the following changes to the
previous release:* Support for RFC 9072 - Extended Optional Parameters
Length for `BGP OPEN` Message* Support for RFC 8050 - MRT Format with BGP
Additional Path Extensions* Implement receive side of RFC 7911 -
Advertisement of Multiple Paths in BGP. OpenBGPD is currently not able to send
multiple paths out.* Improve checks of VRPs loaded via RTR or from the roa-
set table.* Allow to optionally specify an expiry time for `roa-set` entries
to mitigate BGP route decision making based on outdated RPKI data. OpenBGPD's
companion `rpki-client` produces `roa-set`s with the new `expires` property.
ChangeLog:
* Thu Sep 23 2021 Robert Scheck 7.2-1
- Upgrade to 7.2 (#2007210)
* Thu Jul 22 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 7.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #2007210 - openbgpd-7.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007210
rpki-client-7.3-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2021-dab7665591)
RPKI validator to support BGP Origin Validation
Update Information:
rpki-client 7.3 ===* Improve the HTTP client code (status code
handling, http proxy support, keep-alive). * In RRDP, do not access URI with
userinfo (`@`-sign). * Improve RRDP syncing by considering a notification file
serial jumping backwards as synced repository. * Make `-R` (`rsync` only) also
apply to the fetching of TA files. * Only sync `*.{cer,crl,gbr,mft,roa}` files
via `rsync` and exclude all others. * When producing output for OpenBGPd, make
use of the `roa-set expires` attribute to prevent machines from loading outdated
`roa-set`s. * In RRDP, limit the number of deltas to 300 per repo. If more
deltas exist, downloading a full snapshot is faster. * Limit the validation
depth of X509 certificate chains to 12, double the current depth seen in RPKI.
ChangeLog:
* Thu Sep 23 2021 Robert Scheck 7.3-1
- Upgrade to 7.3 (#2007447)
* Tue Sep 14 2021 Sahana Prasad - 7.2-2
- Rebuilt with OpenSSL 3.0.0
References:
[ 1 ] Bug #2007447 - rpki-client-7.3 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007447
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2002422] perl-IPC-Shareable-1.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002422 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-IPC-Shareable-1.06-1.f ||c35 Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:24:45 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c4c6e591cf has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2002422 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2007499] Please update to > 1.02
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ab1b0ba45f has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-ab1b0ba45f` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab1b0ba45f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1994629] perl-libwww-perl-6.56 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994629 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |6 |6 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |5 |5 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |4 |4 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.56-1.fc3 |3 |3 |perl-libwww-perl-6.48-34202 |perl-libwww-perl-6.48-34202 |10903113609.93f36231|10903113609.93f36231 ||perl-libwww-perl-6.48-35202 ||10903113609.642b8640 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-da33f06185 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1994629 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1996268] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210820 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-MODULAR-2021-7ab47be34a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 Modular stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1996268 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1999999] perl-CGI-Fast-2.16 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-CGI-Fast-2.16-1.fc36 |perl-CGI-Fast-2.16-1.fc36 ||perl-CGI-Fast-2.16-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:14:16 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-a4e5d3a268 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2001570] perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.344 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001570 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.34 |perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.34 |4-1.fc36|4-1.fc36 ||perl-Module-ExtractUse-0.34 ||4-1.fc35 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:17:21 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-4d5f15fe8d has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001570 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1999019] perl-Storable-3.25 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999019 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-Storable-3.25-1.fc36 |perl-Storable-3.25-1.fc36 ||perl-Storable-3.25-1.fc35 Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:12:08 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-403225049a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1999019 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm On the one hand, thank you for pointing out that this build is now available. That's good to know. On the other hand, this points at the bigger issue that dealing with the entire problem of missing packages requires a level of scripting and bookkeeping that is very difficult to keep up when building layered projects. > You could request libev-devel in the composes. The reason I did not do that in this case is that pytest-cov is an optional dependency, and we can just remove it from the Python packages instead. I'd rather reduce the dependencies on gevent to make everything faster. When I looked at gevent in EPEL 8 a month or so ago, it did not look like many packages depended on it. > I remain confused why > it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel > package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. We could point at https://kojihub.stream.centos.org/kojifiles/repos/c9s-build/latest/ , but that location will not have GPG-signed builds, and the repo is not currently in https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/blob/main/mock-core-configs/etc/mock/templates/centos-stream-9.tpl - Ken ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:05 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we > > > > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. > > > > > > https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm > > > > > > You could request libev-devel in the composes. I remain confused why > > > it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel > > > package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. > > > > > > > We can't use them in EPEL if they're not in CRB. > > Yes, that's what everyone keeps telling me. I don't understand why. EPEL builds against published RHEL content, not the CentOS Stream buildroot. Having a package available in the CentOS Stream buildroot doesn't make it accessible to EPEL builds. We can't change EPEL to use the CentOS Stream buildroot because that will cause some EPEL packages to not be installable on RHEL. On a related note, EPEL 9 Next _is_ being set up to build against the CentOS Stream 9 buildroot. This works for EPEL Next because it explicitly targets the next minor release of RHEL (i.e. CentOS Stream). This will allow more packages to be built, at the cost of potentially confusing packagers when their package builds successfully for EPEL 9 Next but not for EPEL 9. EPEL 8 Next currently builds against published CentOS Stream 8 content. If things go well with EPEL 9 Next using the CentOS Stream 9 buildroot, EPEL 8 Next may switch to using the CentOS Stream 8 buildroot in the future. > > josh > ___ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2007499] Please update to > 1.02
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-5038241781 has been pushed to the Fedora 33 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-2021-5038241781` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-5038241781 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Mangling shebangs in text files: How to detect them, bug in the current implementation and possible solutions
Steve Grubb kirjoitti 23.9.2021 klo 18.15: On Wednesday, September 22, 2021 5:34:17 PM EDT Miro Hrončok wrote: From all the scan that we've done on fullish installs in the past, there's only 2 others that you might run across: application/x-elc (lisp) and application/x-java-applet. Maybe you just build in logic to workaround these 3 types? application/ javascript is really the only one I can think of that is common. Yeah, maybe we should just do that. However, that would not cleanup the executable pngs. They should be easy to identify, they start with 'image'. There's not many types on a typical system. This is what I see in /usr on a system with 5000 packages installed: application/gzip application/javascript application/json application/octet-stream application/vnd.ms-fontobject application/x-bad-elf application/x-executable application/x-kdelnk application/x-sharedlib application/zip audio/ogg font/sfnt image/gif image/jpeg image/png image/vnd.microsoft.icon text/html text/plain text/x-awk text/x-c text/x-gawk text/x-lua text/x-luatex text/x-perl text/x-python text/x-ruby text/x-shellscript text/x-systemtap text/x-tcl You might just make a map since the list is not all that big. The biggest issue is when you have things text/plain or application/octet-stream. That means we don't know what it is. What about keeping the "detect mime type" approach, then dividing the results into three categories? 1. Can be executable, if so, must have a shebang, which is mangled: text/* is already there, add application/javascript and possibly others as needed. 2. Cannot be executable, remote the executable bit if found: image/* would take care of the executable pngs, many more like application/json can be added as needed. 3. The rest: do nothing with these. Maybe that would be good enough, even if the mime type detection uncertainty sets a limit on how precise it can be? Keeping the mime type detection approach, but using less data (the first 8 bytes approach) does not sound good. If 'file' really works better that way, then there is something wrong with it. As for the application/javascript type, there is an IETF proposal that, among other things, tries to deprecate that and de-deprecate text/javascript [1]. So, perhaps some day category 1 could be reasonably equated with text/* again. [1]: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dispatch-javascript-mjs Otto ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2006106] perl-libwww-perl-6.57 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006106 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-libwww-perl-6.57-1.fc3 ||5 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:32:19 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-e3e3459bb1 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006106 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2005703] perl-Git-CPAN-Patch-2.4.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005703 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Git-CPAN-Patch-2.4.0-1 |perl-Git-CPAN-Patch-2.4.0-1 |.fc36 |.fc36 ||perl-Git-CPAN-Patch-2.4.0-1 ||.fc35 Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:30:07 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c957fbdd1f has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2005703 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2006089] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20210920 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006089 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 |0920-1.fc36 |0920-1.fc36 ||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2021 ||0920-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:32:24 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-713ed6ce30 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006089 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2006104] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20210920 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006104 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 |0210920-1.fc36 |0210920-1.fc36 ||perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.2 ||0210920-1.fc35 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:32:26 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-583bdb0bf7 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006104 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1976778] perl-SNMP-Info-3.78 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-SNMP-Info-3.78-1.fc36 |perl-SNMP-Info-3.78-1.fc36 ||perl-SNMP-Info-3.78-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:23:12 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-926d89943b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976778 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 1:03 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer > wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we > > > > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. > > > > > > > https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm > > > > > > You could request libev-devel in the composes. I remain confused why > > > it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel > > > package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. > > > > > > > We can't use them in EPEL if they're not in CRB. > > Yes, that's what everyone keeps telling me. I don't understand why. > EPEL9 will not be built again CentOS Stream 9, it will be built off RHEL 9. That is the EPEL policy. Thus, if something is not in RHEL 9, it is not available to be built in EPEL 9. It seems pretty straightforward. Troy ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:03 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we > > > > > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. > > > > > > > > https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm > > > > > > > > You could request libev-devel in the composes. I remain confused why > > > > it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel > > > > package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. > > > > > > > > > > We can't use them in EPEL if they're not in CRB. > > > > Yes, that's what everyone keeps telling me. I don't understand why. > > > > Well, because outside of RHEL, everyone wants remote and local builds > to have access to the same resources and not crush the servers. Since > buildroot stuff isn't going out on the mirror network (otherwise, why > would it be separate from CRB?), it's obvious we shouldn't rely on it > for packages that people should expect to be able to build and rebuild > for RHEL. So you have access to what you want, you have a way to pull it down and get it locally, but you can't depend on it because... you're worried a multi-billion dollar company can't pay it's server and CDN bills? As to why it's separate from CRB, that's because CRB is a reflection of what is provided as part of the product. It's that simple. > And again, by Red Hat's own sword (policy), RHEL doesn't want to ship > everything needed to build stuff, so if EPEL is intended to provide > the requisite community guarantees (reproducibly buildable), we have > to work with what RHEL gives us. I think that is also EPEL falling on EPEL's own sword a bit. I think it fails to recognize that building and distributing software can be separate things. I can see the need for a developer community to be able to build, update, and rebuild software it distributes. Access to the buildroots facilitates this. We could even point mock configs at it, or propose a buildroot repo for it if people are really worried about "servers". However, in the context of something like python-gevent, an EPEL *end user* isn't going to want libuv-devel or libev-devel to be installed on their system at runtime. They have no need for it to be available in a compose. They only need python-gevent and the requisite runtime libraries, which are already provided. I think separating the personas and thinking about the requirements for each might be worth doing. I understand this is a different approach and something that looks different from the past. It's been 2+ years since the OS EPEL8 is based on has shipped and it is taking a different approach than previous releases. Every indication we have shows the next major version will continue this. I'm worried that sticking with past policies precludes EPEL from making progress on a project that we all want to see succeed. josh ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000615] perl-Locale-Codes-3.68 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000615 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-Locale-Codes-3.68-1.fc ||35 Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:27:34 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-9eb27f1996 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000615 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2003640] Upgrade perl-Text-Template to 1.60
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003640 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Text-Template-1.60-1.f ||c35 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:24:47 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-7286100d58 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2003640 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1998462] perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0601 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0 |perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0 |601-1.fc36 |601-1.fc36 ||perl-Test-TrailingSpace-0.0 ||601-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:13:23 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-569e7462da has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998462 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1997110] Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 2.0.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997110 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version||perl-Carp-Assert-More-2.0.1 ||-1.fc35 Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:09:15 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-611fd43f88 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997110 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2001345] perl-DateTime-Calendar-Julian-0.105 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001345 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Calendar-Juli ||an-0.105-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:16:47 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-1ec1e8657b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001345 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1975580] perl-XXX-0.38 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975580 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-XXX-0.38-1.fc36|perl-XXX-0.38-1.fc36 ||perl-XXX-0.38-1.fc35 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:14:29 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-aec41e4b2b has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1975580 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000561] perl-String-Formatter-1.234 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000561 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Fixed In Version|perl-String-Formatter-1.234 |perl-String-Formatter-1.234 |-1.fc36 |-1.fc36 ||perl-String-Formatter-1.234 ||-1.fc35 Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:14:20 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-0fdef4a660 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000561 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2000524] Upgrade perl-Digest to 1.20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc36 |perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc36 |perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc34 |perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc34 |perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc33 |perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc33 ||perl-Digest-1.20-1.fc35 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-59f14a752a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2000524 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1998446] perl-File-Find-Object-Rule-0.0313 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998446 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-Find-Object-Rule- |perl-File-Find-Object-Rule- |0.0313-1.fc36 |0.0313-1.fc36 ||perl-File-Find-Object-Rule- ||0.0313-1.fc35 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2021-09-24 20:13:30 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-c2b65209b5 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998446 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 1997123] Upgrade perl-Text-Tabs+Wrap to 2021.0814
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997123 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-fc79da3aef has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997123 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:03 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we > > > > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. > > > > > > https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm > > > > > > You could request libev-devel in the composes. I remain confused why > > > it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel > > > package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. > > > > > > > We can't use them in EPEL if they're not in CRB. > > Yes, that's what everyone keeps telling me. I don't understand why. > Well, because outside of RHEL, everyone wants remote and local builds to have access to the same resources and not crush the servers. Since buildroot stuff isn't going out on the mirror network (otherwise, why would it be separate from CRB?), it's obvious we shouldn't rely on it for packages that people should expect to be able to build and rebuild for RHEL. And again, by Red Hat's own sword (policy), RHEL doesn't want to ship everything needed to build stuff, so if EPEL is intended to provide the requisite community guarantees (reproducibly buildable), we have to work with what RHEL gives us. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 4:02 PM Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we > > > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. > > > > https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm > > > > You could request libev-devel in the composes. I remain confused why > > it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel > > package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. > > > > We can't use them in EPEL if they're not in CRB. Yes, that's what everyone keeps telling me. I don't understand why. josh ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:59 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > > > Hi folks, > > > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we > > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. > > https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm > > You could request libev-devel in the composes. I remain confused why > it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel > package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. > We can't use them in EPEL if they're not in CRB. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] Re: python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 3:46 PM Ken Dreyer wrote: > > Hi folks, > > The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we > cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. https://odcs.stream.centos.org/production/CentOS-Stream-9-20210924.0/compose/CRB/x86_64/os/Packages/libuv-devel-1.42.0-1.el9.x86_64.rpm You could request libev-devel in the composes. I remain confused why it has to be in the compose though, because libev and it's devel package are accessible in the CentOS Stream 9 buildroots today. josh > (It's possible to package the missing -devel packages separately, and > I've been doing this by automatically following the NVR changes in > Stream 9's Koji for several weeks with scripts at > https://github.com/ktdreyer/ceph-el9. My conclusion is that it is so > painful that it's not sustainable to do this for years.) > > This means that python-pytest-cov and python-pytest-xdist won't be > available on epel9, since those require gevent. > > Several Python packages require python-pytest-cov because upstream > lists it in requirements.txt or tests-requirements.txt. I think we > should just patch these out in Fedora. Even apart from RHEL's > restrictions, it's not a good use of resources to run pytest-cov when > no one reviews coverage reports in the Koji logs, and we'll speed up > builds when mock doesn't have to install this spurious BuildRequires. > > Here are a list of packages where I've removed pytest-cov: > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-watchdog/pull-request/4 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cheroot/pull-request/15 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-portend/pull-request/5 > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-typing-extensions/pull-request/3 > > - Ken > ___ > epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[EPEL-devel] python-gevent and pytest-cov in el9
Hi folks, The RHEL 9 composes do not have libev-devel and libuv-devel, so we cannot build python-gevent on EPEL 9 easily. (It's possible to package the missing -devel packages separately, and I've been doing this by automatically following the NVR changes in Stream 9's Koji for several weeks with scripts at https://github.com/ktdreyer/ceph-el9. My conclusion is that it is so painful that it's not sustainable to do this for years.) This means that python-pytest-cov and python-pytest-xdist won't be available on epel9, since those require gevent. Several Python packages require python-pytest-cov because upstream lists it in requirements.txt or tests-requirements.txt. I think we should just patch these out in Fedora. Even apart from RHEL's restrictions, it's not a good use of resources to run pytest-cov when no one reviews coverage reports in the Koji logs, and we'll speed up builds when mock doesn't have to install this spurious BuildRequires. Here are a list of packages where I've removed pytest-cov: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-watchdog/pull-request/4 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-cheroot/pull-request/15 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-portend/pull-request/5 https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-typing-extensions/pull-request/3 - Ken ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora Linux 35 Final blocker review summary
F35 Beta is GO! Time to focus on the Final blockers. Action summary Accepted blockers - 1. mesa — gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to revert the regression-causing commit 2. abrt — abrt-dbus segmentation faulted in abrt_p2_service_dbus when shutting down, rebooting, or logging out of Plasma — ASSIGNED ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue 3. xdg-desktop-portal — time is transiently incorrect when Automatic Time Zone is enabled — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue Proposed blockers - 1. cockpit — Non-root user cannot join a domain through Cockpit — POST ACTION: Maintainers include upstream PR in an update 2. gedit — gedit crashes when searching for files — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue 3. spice-vdagent — Mouse cursor position has a horizontal and vertical offset after changing resolution in a VM — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to diagnose and fix issue 4. libreport — Abort doesn't work well — NEW ACTION: abrt teams to continue investigating retrace server issue 5. selinux-policy — The switch for Fedora Third Party repositories does not switch them on. — ASSIGNED ACTION: Maintainers to create SELinux policy that permits the appropriate action 6. systemd — [DNS over TLS] following connection to a wifi AP, internet is not available for ~30s — NEW ACTION: Maintainers to fix issue NEEDINFO: lpoetter 7. webkit2gtk3 — crash happens everytime when try to add a google account to Online Account — MODIFIED ACTION: QA to verify FEDORA-2021-c58350f4c8 Bug-by-bug detail = Accepted blockers - 1. mesa — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1989726 — NEW gnome-shell: cogl_texture_get_gl_texture(): gnome-shell killed by SIGSEGV The Tegra driver in mesa has a regression that causes this bug. Working with upstream on this. This bug was waived from F35 Beta. 2. abrt — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1997315 — ASSIGNED abrt-dbus segmentation faulted in abrt_p2_service_dbus when shutting down, rebooting, or logging out of Plasma The crash reporter crashes (preventing us from receiving a crash report from the crash reporter) when logging out or shutting down a graphical session. It appears to be due to a change between glib2-2.69.0-1.fc35 and glib2-2.69.2-1.fc35. 3. xdg-desktop-portal — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1991075 — NEW time is transiently incorrect when Automatic Time Zone is enabled The displayed time is incorrect in some cases when Automatic Time Zone is enabled. Both `timedatectl` and the GNOME display show the wrong time. This behavior appears to exist on F34 and F35. Proposed blockers - 1. cockpit — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006028 — POST Non-root user cannot join a domain through Cockpit Non-root users who are members of the "Wheel" group cannot join a FreeIPA or AD domain through Cockpit. Upstream PR https://github.com/cockpit-project/cockpit/pull/16371 contains a fix which appears to work. 2. gedit — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007602 — NEW gedit crashes when searching for files When searching for a file in gedit, it results in a SIGSEGV. 3. spice-vdagent — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006746 — NEW Mouse cursor position has a horizontal and vertical offset after changing resolution in a VM Occasionally (1/3 times in kparal's testing), the mouse position was offset in a virtual machine until rebooting. 4. libreport — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006632 — NEW Abort doesn't work well Crash reports from abrt fail. This may be an issue with the retrace server. abrt team is investigating. 5. selinux-policy — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2001837 — ASSIGNED The switch for Fedora Third Party repositories does not switch them on. Enabling third party repos failed, which was sort of fixed in gnome-initial-setup-41~rc-3.fc35. However, when running SELinux in enforcing mode, it still fails. The `pkexec` run as part of gnome-initial-setup leaves the SELinux context unchanged and the xdm_t type does not have the ability to edit the appropriate files. 6. systemd — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006393 — NEW [DNS over TLS] following connection to a wifi AP, internet is not available for ~30s In some environments, systemd-resolved makes a DNS over TLS request and gets no response, so it wait until it times out. Disabling DNS over TLS avoids the problem, which may be caused by a "router…of questionable quality." 7. webkit2gtk3 — https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2006624 — MODIFIED crash happens everytime when try to add a google account to Online Account Trying to add a Google account causes Online Accounts to crash. Update FEDORA-2021-c58350f4c8 contains a candidate fix. -- Ben Cotton He / Him / His Fedora Program Manager Red Hat
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
Even the porting to openbabel3 of 'xdrawchem' is done. Please, can anyone that uses these software test them? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/Openbabel-3/builds/ On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:> xdrawchem https://github.com/bryanherger/xdrawchem/pull/17 Best regards. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-35-20210924.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 3/204 (x86_64), 5/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000787 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000787 ID: 1000795 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso base_update_cli URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000795 ID: 1000835 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000835 ID: 1000873 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000873 ID: 1000992 Test: aarch64 universal install_blivet_with_swap@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000992 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-35-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000784 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000784 ID: 1000896 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000896 ID: 1001002 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1001002 Soft failed openQA tests: 4/141 (aarch64), 4/204 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-35-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000891 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000891 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-35-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000758 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000758 ID: 1000800 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000800 ID: 1000801 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000801 ID: 1000812 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000812 ID: 1000819 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000819 ID: 1000876 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000876 ID: 1000903 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000903 Passed openQA tests: 197/204 (x86_64), 132/141 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-35-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000697 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000697 ID: 1000830 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000830 ID: 1000852 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso release_identification@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000852 ID: 1000979 Test: x86_64 universal install_with_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000979 Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 4 MiB Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/998784#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000753#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload: 1 services(s) removed since previous compose: geoclue.service Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/998786#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000755#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi: System load changed from 0.83 to 0.69 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/998810#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000779#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload: System load changed from 0.92 to 1.17 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/998811#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000780#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default@uefi: Used swap changed from 7 MiB to 5 MiB 1 services(s) added since previous compose: fwupd.service System load changed from 0.68 to 0.82 Average CPU usage changed from 26.47142857 to 9.06190476 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/998828#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000797#downloads Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso install_default_upload: Used swap changed from 6 MiB to 8 MiB System load changed from 0.50 to 0.77 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/998830#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000799#downloads Installed system changes in test aarch64 Server-boot-iso
Re: Self Introduction: Titouan Bénard
On Friday, 24 September 2021 16.14.23 WEST Titouan Bénard wrote: > Hello, > > I'm Titouan, I have made some contribution in open > source and now I would like to contribute in Fedora. > > I would like to package python packages not present in Fedora. > > Thanks Hi Titouan, welcome to Fedora. :-) We look forward to your contributions. Feel free to ask for help if you need to. There is a python development list, associated to a SIG (Special Interest Group), in case you want to join: Fedora Python SIG Regards, -- José Abílio ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
OpenJDK and unremoved directories
Hello. I have a lot of unremoved directories and files in /usr/lib/jvm/: $ ls -l /usr/lib/jvm/ total 140 drwxr-xr-x. 5 root root 4096 Sep 10 14:32 java-11-openjdk-11.0.12.0.7-4.fc34.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Mar 14 2017 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.121-10.b14.fc25.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Apr 21 2017 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.131-1.b12.fc25.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 25 2017 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.151-1.b12.fc26.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 25 2017 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.151-1.b12.fc27.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jan 24 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.161-0.b14.fc27.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Feb 6 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.161-5.b14.fc27.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Mar 29 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.162-3.b12.fc27.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Apr 18 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.171-1.b10.fc27.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Apr 25 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.171-4.b10.fc27.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Apr 25 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.171-4.b10.fc28.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jul 3 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.172-12.b11.fc28.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jun 18 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.172-9.b11.fc28.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jul 23 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.181-7.b13.fc28.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Sep 5 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.181.b15-0.fc28.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 4 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.181.b15-5.fc28.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 11 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.181.b15-6.fc28.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 11 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.181.b15-6.fc29.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Nov 29 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b12-11.fc29.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Nov 1 2018 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b12-8.fc29.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jan 14 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.191.b13-0.fc29.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Feb 6 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.201.b09-2.fc29.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Mar 26 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.201.b09-6.fc29.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Apr 23 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.212.b04-0.fc29.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Apr 23 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.212.b04-0.fc30.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jul 31 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.222.b10-0.fc30.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 16 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.232.b09-0.fc30.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 16 2019 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.232.b09-0.fc31.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jan 28 2020 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.242.b08-0.fc31.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Mar 23 2020 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.242.b08-1.fc32.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 May 4 2020 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.252.b09-0.fc32.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 May 22 2020 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.252.b09-1.fc32.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jul 17 2020 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.262.b10-1.fc32.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Jul 28 2020 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.265.b01-1.fc32.x86_64 drwxr-xr-x. 3 root root 4096 Oct 21 2020 java-1.8.0-openjdk-1.8.0.272.b10-0.fc32.x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 21 Sep 10 14:32 jre -> /etc/alternatives/jre lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 24 Sep 10 14:32 jre-11 -> /etc/alternatives/jre_11 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 32 Sep 10 14:32 jre-11-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/jre_11_openjdk lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 41 Aug 31 18:50 jre-11-openjdk-11.0.12.0.7-4.fc34.x86_64 -> java-11-openjdk-11.0.12.0.7-4.fc34.x86_64 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 29 Sep 10 14:32 jre-openjdk -> /etc/alternatives/jre_openjdk I think the OpenJDK's scriplets need to be adjusted to remove everything. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Rawhide-20210924.n.0 compose check report
Missing expected images: Xfce raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 2 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests: MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud Failed openQA tests: 6/206 (x86_64), 13/141 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000344 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000344 ID: 1000491 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000491 ID: 1000492 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000492 ID: 1000495 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_default_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000495 ID: 1000544 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000544 ID: 1000575 Test: x86_64 universal install_delete_pata **GATING** URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000575 ID: 1000582 Test: x86_64 universal install_european_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000582 ID: 1000599 Test: x86_64 universal install_package_set_kde URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000599 ID: 1000644 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000644 ID: 1000654 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000654 ID: 1000662 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000662 ID: 1000679 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000679 ID: 1000680 Test: aarch64 universal install_european_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000680 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000435 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000435 ID: 1000482 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_blivet_lvm_ext4@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000482 ID: 1000549 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000549 ID: 1000649 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000649 ID: 1000690 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000690 ID: 1001038 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1001038 Soft failed openQA tests: 7/141 (aarch64), 4/206 (x86_64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000548 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz evince@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000548 ID: 1000550 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_update_graphical@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000550 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000409 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000409 ID: 1000451 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000451 ID: 1000452 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000452 ID: 1000463 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000463 ID: 1000472 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000472 ID: 1000529 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000529 ID: 1000556 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000556 ID: 1000643 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_64bit@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000643 ID: 1000665 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000665 Passed openQA tests: 196/206 (x86_64), 97/141 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0): ID: 1000433 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_update_graphical URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000433 ID: 1000438 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000438 ID: 1000470 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL:
Re: remove-retired-packages
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 11:59 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a): sudo dnf remove $(dnf -C list extras | cut -d ' ' -f -1 | tail -n +3) This will remove packages which are not in current repositories. On my workstation, this will suggests to remove webex, which I installed manually as an rpm. And I definitelly want to keep it. My current implementation is more conversative and remove only packages which were presented at some point in Fedora and now are retired. It is so conservative, that it even leave behind the packages from N-2 version. Miroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 35 compose report: 20210924.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-35-20210923.n.0 NEW: Fedora-35-20210924.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 2 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 38.81 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -3.03 KiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: blivet-gui-2.3.0-3.fc35 Old package: blivet-gui-2.3.0-2.fc35 Summary: Tool for data storage configuration RPMs: blivet-gui blivet-gui-runtime Size: 339.08 KiB Size change: 310 B Changelog: * Wed Sep 22 2021 Adam Williamson - 2.3.0-3 - Backport PR #294 to fix bug deleting not-yet-created RAID device (#2005289) Package: glib2-2.70.0-2.fc35 Old package: glib2-2.69.3-1.fc35 Summary: A library of handy utility functions RPMs: glib2 glib2-devel glib2-doc glib2-static glib2-tests Size: 38.47 MiB Size change: -3.33 KiB Changelog: * Fri Sep 17 2021 Kalev Lember 2.70.0-1 - Update to 2.70.0 * Tue Sep 21 2021 Adam Williamson 2.70.0-2 - Re-enable a workaround to fix g-i-s/gnome-keyring (#2005625) = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210924.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210923.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210924.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:2 Upgraded packages: 104 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 11.69 MiB Size of dropped packages:816.15 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 2.18 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: -359.74 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker aarch64 Path: Container/aarch64/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20210924.n.0.aarch64.tar.xz Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz aarch64 Path: Labs/aarch64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Rawhide-20210924.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Scientific_KDE live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210923.n.0.iso Image: Astronomy_KDE live x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20210923.n.0.iso Image: Scientific vagrant-virtualbox x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-Rawhide-20210923.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-virtualbox.box Image: Scientific vagrant-libvirt x86_64 Path: Labs/x86_64/images/Fedora-Scientific-Vagrant-Rawhide-20210923.n.0.x86_64.vagrant-libvirt.box = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: sdrpp-1.0.3-2.fc36 Summary: SDRPlusPlus bloat-free SDR receiver software RPMs:sdrpp Size:11.42 MiB Package: tree-pkg-1.8.0-9.fc36 Summary: File system tree viewer RPMs:tree Size:273.37 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: felix-gogo-runtime-1.1.4-2.fc35 Summary: Apache Felix Gogo command line shell for OSGi RPMs:felix-gogo-runtime felix-gogo-runtime-javadoc Size:544.55 KiB Package: tree-1.8.0-7.fc35 Summary: File system tree viewer RPMs:tree Size:271.59 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: anaconda-36.4-1.fc36 Old package: anaconda-36.2-1.fc36 Summary: Graphical system installer RPMs: anaconda anaconda-core anaconda-dracut anaconda-gui anaconda-install-env-deps anaconda-install-img-deps anaconda-live anaconda-tui anaconda-widgets anaconda-widgets-devel Size: 20.61 MiB Size change: 63.09 KiB Changelog: * Thu Sep 16 2021 Martin Kolman - 36.3-1 - Fix boolean comparisons in asserts (vslavik) - Stop using distutils to compare kernel versions (vslavik) - Clarify scope of ignored locations (amahdal) - Clarify reference to other *multiple* `inst.ks` arguments (amahdal) - Clarify default behavior before `inst.ks.all` (amahdal) - Clarify `inst.ks.all` description by using imperative mode (amahdal) - Add missing markup for option names and "value types" (amahdal) - Copy logs in a task instead of a %post script (vslavik) * Thu Sep 23 2021 Martin Kolman - 36.4-1 - Do not crash if restorecon is missing on target system (vslavik) - Move chmod into file copying function in CopyLogsTask (vslavik) - Clarify that the software selection doesn't affect the Anaconda configuration (vponcova) - Set an upper bound to entered sizes (#1992585) (vponcova) - Revert "Install kbd-legacy if keyboard layout is "fi" (#1955793)" (vponcova) - Use octal permissions instead of hexadecimal (vslavik) - Handle new time zones in GUI after earlier switch to zoneinfo (vslavik) - Do not stretch NTP toggle in GUI (vslavik) - Add AlmaLinux profile (andrew.lukoshko) - The NTP server dialog without entries shouldn't crash (#2001591) (vponcova) - Set hostname also from ip= static configuration without device (#1988521) (rvykydal) - Add Silverblue specific logos to profile. (jaberan) - data/profile.d: Add profiles for KDE & Kinoite Spins (tim) - Fix Removed options inst.[product|variant] were subsections (jkonecny) Package: ansible-collection-community-general-3.5.0-2.fc36 Old package: ansible-collection-community-general-3.5.0-1.fc36 Summary: Modules and plugins supported by Ansible community RPMs: ansible-collection-community-general Size: 1.43 MiB Size change: 66 B Changelog: * Thu Sep 23 2021 Alfredo Moralejo - 3.5.0-2 - Use ansible or ansible-core as BuildRequires Package: awscli-1.20.47-1.fc36 Old package: awscli-1.20.46-1.fc36 Summary: Universal Command Line Environment for AWS RPMs: awscli Size: 2.10 MiB Size change: -5 B Changelog: * Thu Sep 23 2021 Gwyn Ciesla - 1.20.47-1 - 1.20.47 Package: ccdciel-0.9.75.1-2.fc36 Old package: ccdciel-0.9.75.1-1.fc35 Summary: CCD capture software RPMs: ccdciel ccdciel-doc Size: 30.13 MiB Size change: -114.31 KiB Changelog: * Wed Jul 21 2021 Fedora Release Engineering - 0.9.75.1-2 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild Package: cifs-utils-6.13-3.fc36 Old package: cifs-utils-6.13-1.fc36 Summary: Utilities for mounting and managing CIFS mounts RPMs: cifs-utils cifs-utils-d
Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG
We have no items on the agenda, so I'll cancel the meeting unless someone wants to propose something in the next three hours. On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2021-09-24 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > > > > Source: https://calendar.fedoraproject.org//meeting/9920/ > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
'ghemical' and 'libghemical' should be okay, too. On 9/1/21 10:35, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: On Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 6:08 PM Antonio T. sagitter wrote: On 8/31/21 5:27 PM, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: We must decide if go forward with most recent software or stay stationary. Which software are not ready for openbabel-3 yet? Almost two years ago (how time flies!), when the subject had been first broached, Dominik provided this list: Link-time dependencies: IQmol avogadro ghemical Okay with debian patch: https://sources.debian.org/src/ghemical/3.0.0-5/debian/patches/openbabel3.patch/ I've applied this to Fedora git source. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: remove-retired-packages
On 24. 09. 21 12:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote: But still I'd rather have this as part of distribution - a package similar to fedora-obsolete-packages which would allow me to remove all retired packages simply by installing it. Oh there is already this proposal - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages And in the followup discussion this was rejected as a bad idea. Example: one of the retired packages is "nspr" but if you try to remove it, then half of your system is gone. :) Therefore it is a good idea to allow user to "cherry-pick" packages which should be kept on machine despite being retired. I think w are over-engineering a workaround for something that could be part of system-upgrade. See my proposal in https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DQZOCSVPW4R4MZR2QYBQTO6ZTTU3RCKW/ that got 0 replies: Generally, I think we should instead strive to have configurable bahavior of dnf system-upgrade: option 1) broken deps block upgrades, user go figure (status quo) option 2) broken deps of packages not part of distupgrade repository behave like --allowerasing option 3) all packages not part of distupgrade repository are removed on distro boundary upgrade option 4) --allowerasing (already possible) With alterations for 2/3: suboption a) this affects all packages suboption b) this affects only packages installed from "system repos" (Suboption b) can be achieved trough a .repo file configuration option.) Then we can have a discussion about the best default for Fedora. Such solution obviously requires somebody to design it, code it, test it, support it and maintain it. I cannot speak for the software management team, but I guess they would have reasons not to do that (such as capacity reasons). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: remove-retired-packages
Dne 24. 09. 21 v 11:27 Marek Blaha napsal(a):
It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove
python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.).
Oh. Silly me. I will fix this.
Another idea: The script currently needs fedora-packager (for the pkgname
command). If you use --qf=%{NAME} in the repoquery, it won't.
Yes, I've already created a small PR on those dependencies (another is
using `dnf repoquery` instead of `repoquery` that drops depencendy on
dnf-utils package).
Thank you.
But still I'd rather have this as part of distribution - a package
similar to fedora-obsolete-packages which would allow me to remove all
retired packages simply by installing it.
Oh there is already this proposal -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
And in the followup discussion this was rejected as a bad idea.
Example: one of the retired packages is "nspr" but if you try to remove it,
then half of your system is gone. :)
Therefore it is a good idea to allow user to "cherry-pick" packages which
should be kept on machine despite being retired.
Miroslav
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2007313] perl-App-cpm-0.997007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007313 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpm-0.997.007-1.fc ||36 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2021-09-24 10:16:57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007313 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: openbabel-3.1* in Rawhide
I have not used this patch for getting 'gnome-chemistry-utils' working
in x11 and Wayland:
diff --git a/programs/3d/main.cc b/programs/3d/main.cc
index 9bd59a4..aa18e3e 100644
--- a/programs/3d/main.cc
+++ b/programs/3d/main.cc
@@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
GError *error = NULL;
GOptionContext *context;
+ gdk_set_allowed_backends ("wayland,x11");
gtk_init (, );
gcu::Element::LoadBODR ();
diff --git a/programs/crystal/main.cc b/programs/crystal/main.cc
index e688c3d..55fd8b9 100644
--- a/programs/crystal/main.cc
+++ b/programs/crystal/main.cc
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
GOptionContext *context;
GError *error = NULL;
+ gdk_set_allowed_backends ("wayland,x11");
gtk_init (, );
Element::LoadRadii ();
if (argc > 1 && argv[1][0] == '-') {
because i don't know if it's correct. Some tools need to be ran by
setting the GDK_BACKEND environment variable.
On 9/24/21 07:41, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 3:37 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
gnome-chemistry-utils is ready for openbabel3; it's in my Copr project.
Well done Antonio!
I will give it a try this weekend.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/
OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: remove-retired-packages
On 24/09/2021 06:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote: I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using: Much more simple script: sudo dnf remove $(dnf -C list extras | cut -d ' ' -f -1 | tail -n +3) -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Why is %_host defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux-gnu on the arm builders?
On Thu, 2021-09-23 at 20:10 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: > Hi, > > I've noticed that the %_host macro is defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux- > gnu on > the arm builders. I believe this is coming from the mockhost config > option in kojid. > > In /usr/lib/rpm/macros %_host is defined as armv7hl-redhat-linux- > gnueabi > which matches the gcc triple used on arm. Is there a particular reason > for overriding this %_host definition? Hi, I have to deal it this in dpkg package (which is Debian tool that we have in Fedora) [1] AFAICT is a RedHat style vs Debian style , but GCC it self adopt Debian style , so I think we should follow the Debian/GCC and remove that override . [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/dpkg/blob/rawhide/f/ostable_armv7hl.patch Best regards, > -Tom > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20210924.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210923.0): ID: 1000205 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000205 ID: 1000213 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1000213 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: remove-retired-packages
On Fri, Sep 24, 2021 at 10:58 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > Should it query for removed packages instead of components?
> >
> > It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove
> > python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.).
> >
> > PS That's why I mentioned both options when answering your "how to find out
> > what has been retired" question. The solution is to stop using the source
> > repos
> > (and src arch).
>
> Another idea: The script currently needs fedora-packager (for the pkgname
> command). If you use --qf=%{NAME} in the repoquery, it won't.
Yes, I've already created a small PR on those dependencies (another is
using `dnf repoquery` instead of `repoquery` that drops depencendy on
dnf-utils package).
And I agree that the script should use packages instead of source
packages - currently the results are really wild - a lot of packages
is suggested for removal without being actually retired.
But still I'd rather have this as part of distribution - a package
similar to fedora-obsolete-packages which would allow me to remove all
retired packages simply by installing it.
Oh there is already this proposal -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Fedora-Retired-Packages
Marek Blaha
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: remove-retired-packages
On 24. 09. 21 10:50, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 24. 09. 21 6:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Hi.
I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using:
$ sudo dnf copr enable msuchy/remove-retired-packages
$ remove-retired-packages
This script removes packages retired between Fedora N and Fedora N-1. You can
run it with parameter:
$ remove-retired-packages 30
And it will remove all packages retired between Fedora N and Fedora 30.
It removes packages one-by-one. And you have the option to skip specific
package.
The source is here:
https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-upgrade/blob/main/remove-retired-packages
Should it query for removed packages instead of components?
It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove
python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.).
PS That's why I mentioned both options when answering your "how to find out
what has been retired" question. The solution is to stop using the source repos
(and src arch).
Another idea: The script currently needs fedora-packager (for the pkgname
command). If you use --qf=%{NAME} in the repoquery, it won't.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: remove-retired-packages
On 24. 09. 21 6:44, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Hi. I created small script `remove-retired-packages`. You can try it using: $ sudo dnf copr enable msuchy/remove-retired-packages $ remove-retired-packages This script removes packages retired between Fedora N and Fedora N-1. You can run it with parameter: $ remove-retired-packages 30 And it will remove all packages retired between Fedora N and Fedora 30. It removes packages one-by-one. And you have the option to skip specific package. The source is here: https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-upgrade/blob/main/remove-retired-packages Should it query for removed packages instead of components? It seem that when python-foo is retired, the script will attempt to remove python-foo instead of python3-foo (and python3-foo-docs etc.). PS That's why I mentioned both options when answering your "how to find out what has been retired" question. The solution is to stop using the source repos (and src arch). -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Naming convention
> Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71? Yes, but in the case of autoconf2.71, I am wondering how to deal with an update since this package should be the latest version. Creating package autoconf2.72 in the future doesn't make sense to me. My thought was to use autoconf2.7 and in case of a new release update this package. Another option could be autoconf2.7.x. Thanks Filip čt 23. 9. 2021 v 13:48 odesílatel Florian Weimer napsal: > * Dominik Mierzejewski: > > > On Thursday, 23 September 2021 at 09:52, Filip Janus wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> I am wondering about the right name for Autoconf compact package. I > need to > >> add the latest release of autoconf into EPEL so I need a package with a > >> different name. Currently, there are in fedora autoconf, autoconf213, > and > >> autoconf268. The latest version is 2.71 so I have few options in my > mind: > >> > >>- compat-autoconf > >>- compat-autoconf27 > >>- autoconf27 > >> > >> What do you think? > > > > The last one is almost the currently recommended convention. The correct > > name would be "autoconf2.7": > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#multiple > > Shouldn't it be autoconf2.71, assuming that it is for autoconf 2.71? > > Thanks, > Florian > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Package Update Guide: Updating inter-dependent packages
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages Shouldn't it be somehow aligned with this ^^ chapter? Maybe the chapter should be referenced at least, because it explains how to request the side tag. Vít Dne 23. 09. 21 v 11:29 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#updating_inter_dependent_packages Says: """ You may need a buildroot override to complete a multi-package update successfully. For instance in the case described above, you may need to rebuild bar against the new libfoo package and submit both packages together as a multi-package update. However, in the normal course of events, you would not be able to build another package against your new libfoo build until it reached the stable state. To resolve this dilemma, you can request a buildroot override, which causes the libfoo build to be included in the buildroot for a short time in order to get the bar package build done. """ However, I think side-tags should be the preferred solution, as their impact is isolated. Buildroot overrides create temporary broken dependencies for everybody, while side-tags don't. My understanding was that this is the de-facto consensus, so I'd lie to update the docs to say something like: """ You may need to build the inter-dependent packages in a side tag. For instance in the case described above, you may need to rebuild bar against the new libfoo package and submit both packages together as a multi-package update. However, in the normal course of events, you would not be able to build another package against your new libfoo build until it reached the stable state. To resolve this dilemma, you can request a side tag and build both packages in it, which causes the libfoo build to be included in the bar build's buildroot. """ And than instead of describing the details, link to https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/ Any suggestions or objections? ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2007313] perl-App-cpm-0.997007 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007313 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007313 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2007499] Please update to > 1.02
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2021-ab1b0ba45f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-ab1b0ba45f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007499 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
[Bug 2007254] perl-POE-Component-SSLify-1.012-24.fc36 FTBFS: Can't use an undefined value as a symbol reference at /builddir/build/BUILD/POE-Component-SSLify-1.012/blib/lib/POE/Component/SSLify.pm lin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007254 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- I have two theories: Either the patched perl-Net-SSLeay is broken, or perl-POE-Component-SSLify code does TCP shutdown instead of TLS shutdown and thus OpenSSL server reports the "unexpected eof while reading" error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2007254 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-33-20210924.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210923.0): ID: 115 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/115 ID: 123 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/123 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
