Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
On 30/09/21 07:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6d9aa26ae is
> resubmitted.
>
> Zbyszek

Thanks for taking care of that, I've not had much time in the last
couple of days to look into it.

So, it would be nice to have someone testing the change and leave some
karma to the update, so that we can push it to stable before getting
stuck in the next freeze...

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Slow download speed of RPMs updates

2021-10-02 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
Recently I've started seen a strange behavior of dnf while downloading
RPMs updates: some packages are downloaded at the usual speed of my
connection (ca. 10MBps), while other packages, in the same transaction,
shows really slow download speed (<100KBps).

Does dnf uses different mirrors to download package updates in the same
transaction? Is there a way to show the mirror dnf downloads the updates
from? Running dnf in verbose mode doesn't show any clue.

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Fedora-Cloud-34-20211002.0 compose check report

2021-10-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20211001.0):

ID: 1009809 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009809
ID: 1009817 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009817

Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 07:35:39AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> On 30/09/21 07:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6d9aa26ae is
> > resubmitted.
> >
> > Zbyszek
> 
> Thanks for taking care of that, I've not had much time in the last
> couple of days to look into it.
> 
> So, it would be nice to have someone testing the change and leave some
> karma to the update, so that we can push it to stable before getting
> stuck in the next freeze...

I decided to take a closer look:
$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libImath-3_0.so.28()(64bit)' --qf '%{SOURCERPM}'
Field3D-1.7.3-14.fc35.src.rpm
ImageMagick-6.9.11.27-6.fc35.src.rpm
OpenColorIO-2.0.1-1.fc35.src.rpm<- missing from the update
OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35.src.rpm
OpenSceneGraph-3.4.1-31.fc35.src.rpm
alembic-1.8.2-1.fc35.3.src.rpm
blender-2.93.4-1.fc35.src.rpm
freeimage-3.19.0-0.6.svn1889.fc35.src.rpm
gmic-2.9.8-3.fc35.src.rpm
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.19.2-1.fc35.src.rpm
hugin-2020.0.0-11.fc35.src.rpm
imath-3.0.2-6.fc35.src.rpm
jpegxl-0.5-1.fc35.src.rpm  <-- this one too
kf5-kimageformats-5.85.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
krita-4.4.5-10.fc35.src.rpm
luxcorerender-2.5-6.fc35.4.src.rpm
openexr-3.0.5-3.fc35.src.rpm
povray-3.7.0.10-2.fc35.src.rpm
vigra-1.11.1-36.fc35.src.rpm
vips-8.11.3-1.fc35.src.rpm

I'll start the rebuilds of those two.

Zbyszek

PS.
At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
Error: 
 Problem: conflicting requests
  - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with 
python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by 
python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch

:(
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

>
> PS.
> At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
> Error:
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with
> python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by
> python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
>

I just checked and python-sphinx-tabs JUST posted a PR to update their
compatibility to docutils 0.17... I'll give it a shot and add it to the
side tag.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 11:12:54AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
> Error: 
>  Problem: conflicting requests
>   - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with 
> python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by 
> python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
> 
> :(

* Fri Sep 17 2021 Karolina Surma  - 0.17.1-1
- Update to 0.17.1
Resolves: rhbz#1927513

python-docutils-0.17.1-1.fc36 broke python-sphinx-tabs :(
Please fix!

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 06:31:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> 
> >
> > PS.
> > At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
> > Error:
> >  Problem: conflicting requests
> >   - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with
> > python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by
> > python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
> >
> 
> I just checked and python-sphinx-tabs JUST posted a PR to update their
> compatibility to docutils 0.17... I'll give it a shot and add it to the
> side tag.

I don't think it needs to go into the side-tag. I only see
python-docutils-0.17.1-1.fc36, and no build for F35.

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 06:31:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > PS.
> > > At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
> > > Error:
> > >  Problem: conflicting requests
> > >   - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with
> > > python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by
> > > python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
> > >
> >
> > I just checked and python-sphinx-tabs JUST posted a PR to update their
> > compatibility to docutils 0.17... I'll give it a shot and add it to the
> > side tag.
>
> I don't think it needs to go into the side-tag. I only see
> python-docutils-0.17.1-1.fc36, and no build for F35.
>

I'm still on my first cup of coffee and the way dnf shows errors is often
difficult to decipher...

I've read it a few more times and I still don't get it. docutils 0.16 is in
f35, which meets both of the conditional requirements.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:43 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 06:31:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>> > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>> >
>> > >
>> > > PS.
>> > > At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
>> > > Error:
>> > >  Problem: conflicting requests
>> > >   - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with
>> > > python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by
>> > > python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
>> > >
>> >
>> > I just checked and python-sphinx-tabs JUST posted a PR to update their
>> > compatibility to docutils 0.17... I'll give it a shot and add it to the
>> > side tag.
>>
>> I don't think it needs to go into the side-tag. I only see
>> python-docutils-0.17.1-1.fc36, and no build for F35.
>>
>
> I'm still on my first cup of coffee and the way dnf shows errors is often
> difficult to decipher...
>
> I've read it a few more times and I still don't get it. docutils 0.16 is
> in f35, which meets both of the conditional requirements.
>

Never mind... So the f36 sphinx-tabs which is causing the problem, so we
need a f35 build of sphinx-tabs.

Why not add to the side tag? Unless we want to setup a separate bodhi
update and try to force it in sooner?

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Slow download speed of RPMs updates

2021-10-02 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 2:48 AM Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Recently I've started seen a strange behavior of dnf while downloading
> RPMs updates: some packages are downloaded at the usual speed of my
> connection (ca. 10MBps), while other packages, in the same transaction,
> shows really slow download speed (<100KBps).
>
> Does dnf uses different mirrors to download package updates in the same
> transaction? Is there a way to show the mirror dnf downloads the updates
> from? Running dnf in verbose mode doesn't show any clue.
>

Yes AFAIK. I've occasionally had slow downloads for a long time (years) and
chalked it up to a slow mirror, but now that you mention it it does "feel"
like it's happening more frequently lately.

Also (and my memory may be faulty here), I believe with yum you could
"ctl-c" once during a slow download and it would find attempt a new
download (presumably from another mirror) but this doesn't work with dnf.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Richard Shaw
On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

>
> I don't think it needs to go into the side-tag. I only see
> python-docutils-0.17.1-1.fc36, and no build for F35.
>

I have completed the f35 build:

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=76601570

But I haven't tagged it into the side-tag per your request. I'm out of free
cycles for this morning.

Thanks,
Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
On 02/10/21 13:45, Richard Shaw wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:43 AM Richard Shaw  wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:34 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 06:31:04AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
 On Sat, Oct 2, 2021 at 6:14 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
 zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:

 >
 > PS.
 > At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
 > Error:
 > Problem: conflicting requests
 > - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with
 > python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by
 > python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
 >

 I just checked and python-sphinx-tabs JUST posted a PR to update their
 compatibility to docutils 0.17... I'll give it a shot and add it to the
 side tag.
>>>
>>> I don't think it needs to go into the side-tag. I only see
>>> python-docutils-0.17.1-1.fc36, and no build for F35.
>>
>> I'm still on my first cup of coffee and the way dnf shows errors is often 
>> difficult to decipher...
>>
>> I've read it a few more times and I still don't get it. docutils 0.16 is in 
>> f35, which meets both of the conditional requirements.
>
> Never mind... So the f36 sphinx-tabs which is causing the problem, so we need 
> a f35 build of sphinx-tabs.
>
> Why not add to the side tag? Unless we want to setup a separate bodhi update 
> and try to force it in sooner?
>
> Thanks,
> Richard

python-docutils is still 0.16 in F35, so there's no need of patching 
sphinx-tabs for 0.17 support and OpenColorIO has been rebuilt just fine.

Mattia___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211002.n.0 changes

2021-10-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20211002.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   82
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:4.06 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   2.09 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   3.74 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-platform-dirs-0.2.0-4.fc35
Summary: Library for obtaining platform dependant directory paths for 
application
RPMs:rust-platform-dirs+default-devel rust-platform-dirs-devel
Size:21.97 KiB

Package: rust-platforms-0.2.1-4.fc35
Summary: Rust platform registry with information about valid Rust platforms
RPMs:rust-platforms+default-devel rust-platforms+serde-devel 
rust-platforms+std-devel rust-platforms-devel
Size:51.35 KiB

Package: rust-psutil-3.2.1-2.fc35
Summary: Process and system monitoring library
RPMs:rust-psutil+cpu-devel rust-psutil+default-devel 
rust-psutil+derive_more-devel rust-psutil+disk-devel rust-psutil+glob-devel 
rust-psutil+host-devel rust-psutil+memory-devel rust-psutil+network-devel 
rust-psutil+num_cpus-devel rust-psutil+platforms-devel 
rust-psutil+process-devel rust-psutil+renamed_serde-devel 
rust-psutil+sensors-devel rust-psutil+serde-devel rust-psutil+unescape-devel 
rust-psutil-devel
Size:187.19 KiB

Package: rust-ytop-0.6.2-6.fc35
Summary: TUI system monitor written in Rust
RPMs:ytop
Size:3.81 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  annobin-10.08-1.fc36
Old package:  annobin-10.07-1.fc36
Summary:  Annotate and examine compiled binary files
RPMs: annobin-annocheck annobin-docs annobin-plugin-clang 
annobin-plugin-gcc annobin-plugin-llvm
Size: 5.11 MiB
Size change:  6.93 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Nick Clifton   - 10.08-1
  - Annocheck: Fix covscan detected problems.
  - Annocheck: Add --profile=el8.
  - gcc-plugin: Conditionalize generation of branch protection note.


Package:  ansible-lint-1:5.2.0-1.fc36
Old package:  ansible-lint-1:5.1.3-1.fc36
Summary:  Best practices checker for Ansible
RPMs: python3-ansible-lint
Size: 195.82 KiB
Size change:  1.70 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Parag Nemade  - 1:5.2.0-1
  - Update to 5.2.0 version (#2009767)


Package:  audit-3.0.6-1.fc36
Old package:  audit-3.0.5-3.fc36
Summary:  User space tools for kernel auditing
RPMs: audispd-plugins audispd-plugins-zos audit audit-libs 
audit-libs-devel python3-audit
Size: 3.16 MiB
Size change:  4.85 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Steve Grubb  3.0.6-1
  - New upstream bugfix release


Package:  awscli-1.20.53-1.fc36
Old package:  awscli-1.20.51-1.fc36
Summary:  Universal Command Line Environment for AWS
RPMs: awscli
Size: 2.10 MiB
Size change:  -89 B
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.20.52-1
  - 1.20.52

  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Gwyn Ciesla  - 1.20.53-1
  - 1.20.53


Package:  cairomm-1.14.2-19.fc36
Old package:  cairomm-1.14.2-18.fc36
Summary:  C++ API for the cairo graphics library
RPMs: cairomm cairomm-devel cairomm-doc
Size: 2.15 MiB
Size change:  460.29 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  1.14.2-19
  - Re-enable Doxygen HTML, stripping JS, for devhelp


Package:  cairomm1.16-1.16.1-13.fc36
Old package:  cairomm1.16-1.16.1-12.fc36
Summary:  C++ API for the cairo graphics library
RPMs: cairomm1.16 cairomm1.16-devel cairomm1.16-doc
Size: 2.08 MiB
Size change:  488.38 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Benjamin A. Beasley  1.16.1-13
  - Re-enable Doxygen HTML, stripping JS, for devhelp


Package:  cekit-3.12.0-1.fc36
Old package:  cekit-3.9.0-3.fc35
Summary:  Container image creation tool
RPMs: cekit cekit-bash-completion cekit-zsh-completion
Size: 135.38 KiB
Size change:  2.34 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Marek Goldmann  - 3.12.0-1
  - Release 3.12.0


Package:  containers-common-4:1-31.fc36
Old package:  containers-common-4:1-30.fc36
Summary:  Common configuration and documentation for containers
RPMs: containers-common
Size: 75.18 KiB
Size change:  2.00 KiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Oct 01 2021 Dan Walsh  - 4:1-31
  - Update to grab latest man pages and configuration files
  - Add Containerfile.md
  - Add containerignore.md


Package:  copr-backend-1.151-1.fc36
Old package:  copr-backend-1.150-1.fc36
Summary:  Backend for Copr
RPMs: copr-backend copr-backend-doc
Size: 346.35 KiB
Size change:  100 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 30 2021 Silvie Chlupova 1.151-1
  - backend: use lock(timeout=5) to work-around fair-locks


Package:  copr-frontend-1.182-1.fc36
Old package:  copr-frontend-1.181-1.fc36
Summary:  Frontend for Copr
RPMs

Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
On 02/10/21 13:12, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 07:35:39AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> On 30/09/21 07:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6d9aa26ae is
>>> resubmitted.
>>>
>>> Zbyszek
>> Thanks for taking care of that, I've not had much time in the last
>> couple of days to look into it.
>>
>> So, it would be nice to have someone testing the change and leave some
>> karma to the update, so that we can push it to stable before getting
>> stuck in the next freeze...
> I decided to take a closer look:
> $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libImath-3_0.so.28()(64bit)' --qf 
> '%{SOURCERPM}'
> Field3D-1.7.3-14.fc35.src.rpm
> ImageMagick-6.9.11.27-6.fc35.src.rpm
> OpenColorIO-2.0.1-1.fc35.src.rpm<- missing from the update
> OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35.src.rpm
> OpenSceneGraph-3.4.1-31.fc35.src.rpm
> alembic-1.8.2-1.fc35.3.src.rpm
> blender-2.93.4-1.fc35.src.rpm
> freeimage-3.19.0-0.6.svn1889.fc35.src.rpm
> gmic-2.9.8-3.fc35.src.rpm
> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.19.2-1.fc35.src.rpm
> hugin-2020.0.0-11.fc35.src.rpm
> imath-3.0.2-6.fc35.src.rpm
> jpegxl-0.5-1.fc35.src.rpm  <-- this one too
> kf5-kimageformats-5.85.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
> krita-4.4.5-10.fc35.src.rpm
> luxcorerender-2.5-6.fc35.4.src.rpm
> openexr-3.0.5-3.fc35.src.rpm
> povray-3.7.0.10-2.fc35.src.rpm
> vigra-1.11.1-36.fc35.src.rpm
> vips-8.11.3-1.fc35.src.rpm
>
> I'll start the rebuilds of those two.
>
> Zbyszek
>
> PS.
> At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
> Error:
>   Problem: conflicting requests
>- nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with 
> python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by 
> python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
>
> :(
I've updated the Bodhi update with the new builds.

Because of a Bodhi bug [1] every time we edit the build list I need to
do some magic in Bodhi backend to unstuck the update.

Mattia

[1] https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/pull/4261

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [RFC] Remove supoort for NIS(+) from PAM

2021-10-02 Thread Demi Marie Obenour
On 10/1/21 12:54 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Oct 2021 at 12:42, Frank Ch. Eigler  wrote:
>>
>> Stephen John Smoogen  writes:
>>
> The places I have seen it still being used are in Universities run by
> people who learned sysadmin in the 1990's and early 2000's. It is a
> light weight system which is simple to set up [...]

 For those people who like simple to set up and working systems but are
 willing to consider upgrading if it's also simple and will keep working,
 is there a NIS->$whatever migration document in fedora someplace?
>>>
>>> I don't think anyone has come up with an agreed upon $whatever that a
>>> majority of people like. There is LDAP but that isn't light. There are
>>> kerberos but that isn't easy.
>>
>> "light" in terms of CPU/network, who cares.  "light" in terms of
>> simplicity and maintenance, you have my attention.  If there is no such
>> gadget available, then please let's keep NIS around.
>>
> 
> The issue is that no one has written anything as simple as ypserv's
> Makefile in the 35+ years yp has been around. Most of the replacements
> start looking at all the problems yp brings with it from sending
> things in plain text, ability to spoof services and controllers,
> ability to spoof user/hosts, and a flood of other things.. and 'fixes
> them'. Those fixes add in complexity and it goes back to 'this is
> stupid, keep yp'.

How many of these can be solved by tunneling everything in a WireGuard
mesh network, and using nftables rules to prevent spoofing?

Sincerely,

Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)


OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 12:16:15PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> On 02/10/21 13:12, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 07:35:39AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> On 30/09/21 07:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >>> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6d9aa26ae is
> >>> resubmitted.
> >>>
> >>> Zbyszek
> >> Thanks for taking care of that, I've not had much time in the last
> >> couple of days to look into it.
> >>
> >> So, it would be nice to have someone testing the change and leave some
> >> karma to the update, so that we can push it to stable before getting
> >> stuck in the next freeze...
> > I decided to take a closer look:
> > $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libImath-3_0.so.28()(64bit)' --qf 
> > '%{SOURCERPM}'
> > Field3D-1.7.3-14.fc35.src.rpm
> > ImageMagick-6.9.11.27-6.fc35.src.rpm
> > OpenColorIO-2.0.1-1.fc35.src.rpm<- missing from the update
> > OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35.src.rpm
> > OpenSceneGraph-3.4.1-31.fc35.src.rpm
> > alembic-1.8.2-1.fc35.3.src.rpm
> > blender-2.93.4-1.fc35.src.rpm
> > freeimage-3.19.0-0.6.svn1889.fc35.src.rpm
> > gmic-2.9.8-3.fc35.src.rpm
> > gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.19.2-1.fc35.src.rpm
> > hugin-2020.0.0-11.fc35.src.rpm
> > imath-3.0.2-6.fc35.src.rpm
> > jpegxl-0.5-1.fc35.src.rpm  <-- this one too
> > kf5-kimageformats-5.85.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
> > krita-4.4.5-10.fc35.src.rpm
> > luxcorerender-2.5-6.fc35.4.src.rpm
> > openexr-3.0.5-3.fc35.src.rpm
> > povray-3.7.0.10-2.fc35.src.rpm
> > vigra-1.11.1-36.fc35.src.rpm
> > vips-8.11.3-1.fc35.src.rpm
> >
> > I'll start the rebuilds of those two.
> >
> > Zbyszek
> >
> > PS.
> > At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
> > Error:
> >   Problem: conflicting requests
> >- nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with 
> > python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by 
> > python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
> >
> > :(
> I've updated the Bodhi update with the new builds.

Ooops, this is still borked:
the side-tag and the update have OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-6.fc35,
but OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35 is tagged into f35, so the update results
in a downgrade.

Should we
a) try to tag OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35 into the side-tag and update
b) rebuild OpenImageIO again
c) do nothing?

Richard, WDYT?

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: [RFC] Remove supoort for NIS(+) from PAM

2021-10-02 Thread James Szinger
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 08:42:02 -0400
Demi Marie Obenour  wrote:
> 
> How many of these can be solved by tunneling everything in a WireGuard
> mesh network, and using nftables rules to prevent spoofing?

Sounds harder than setting up NIS+, which was supposed to solve many
of these issues 30 years ago, but still has not displaced NIS.  Even
if one can secure NIS on the network, that still leaves the issue of
`ypcat passwd`.

These days, I think FreeIPA or Active Directory are the best choices,
but both are complicated and possibly too much for a SO/HO, workgroup,
or departmental sysadmin.  AD has the advantage of supporting Windows,
MacOS, and Samba; the last time I looked FreeIPA was not good at this.

Jim
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Slow download speed of RPMs updates

2021-10-02 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 03:48, Mattia Verga via devel
 wrote:
>
> Recently I've started seen a strange behavior of dnf while downloading
> RPMs updates: some packages are downloaded at the usual speed of my
> connection (ca. 10MBps), while other packages, in the same transaction,
> shows really slow download speed (<100KBps).
>
> Does dnf uses different mirrors to download package updates in the same
> transaction? Is there a way to show the mirror dnf downloads the updates
> from? Running dnf in verbose mode doesn't show any clue.
>

dnf uses the same mirror until there is a complete timeout or a not
found. It will then switch to another mirror

Check the file /var/log/dnf.librepo.log to see if it is capturing the
mirror. On mine it records info like:

http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/fedora/linux//updates/33/Modular/x86_64/repodata/f58e2b59bf551113cf566c6ef119900a3160de712ae1943f67fca42f05c23
0e9-updateinfo.xml.zck
...
2021-10-02T09:31:38-0400 INFO Downloading:
http://packages.oit.ncsu.edu/fedora/linux//updates/33/Everything/x86_64/drpms/appstream-data-33-3.fc33_33-4.fc33.noarch.drpm

> Mattia
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



-- 
Stephen J Smoogen.
I've seen things you people wouldn't believe. Flame wars in
sci.astro.orion. I have seen SPAM filters overload because of Godwin's
Law. All those moments will be lost in time... like posts on a BBS...
time to shutdown -h now.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Heads Up: OpenEXR / Imath 3.1 update

2021-10-02 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
On 02/10/21 14:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 12:16:15PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>> On 02/10/21 13:12, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 07:35:39AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
 On 30/09/21 07:19, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c6d9aa26ae is
> resubmitted.
>
> Zbyszek
 Thanks for taking care of that, I've not had much time in the last
 couple of days to look into it.

 So, it would be nice to have someone testing the change and leave some
 karma to the update, so that we can push it to stable before getting
 stuck in the next freeze...
>>> I decided to take a closer look:
>>> $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libImath-3_0.so.28()(64bit)' --qf 
>>> '%{SOURCERPM}'
>>> Field3D-1.7.3-14.fc35.src.rpm
>>> ImageMagick-6.9.11.27-6.fc35.src.rpm
>>> OpenColorIO-2.0.1-1.fc35.src.rpm<- missing from the update
>>> OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35.src.rpm
>>> OpenSceneGraph-3.4.1-31.fc35.src.rpm
>>> alembic-1.8.2-1.fc35.3.src.rpm
>>> blender-2.93.4-1.fc35.src.rpm
>>> freeimage-3.19.0-0.6.svn1889.fc35.src.rpm
>>> gmic-2.9.8-3.fc35.src.rpm
>>> gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.19.2-1.fc35.src.rpm
>>> hugin-2020.0.0-11.fc35.src.rpm
>>> imath-3.0.2-6.fc35.src.rpm
>>> jpegxl-0.5-1.fc35.src.rpm  <-- this one too
>>> kf5-kimageformats-5.85.0-1.fc35.src.rpm
>>> krita-4.4.5-10.fc35.src.rpm
>>> luxcorerender-2.5-6.fc35.4.src.rpm
>>> openexr-3.0.5-3.fc35.src.rpm
>>> povray-3.7.0.10-2.fc35.src.rpm
>>> vigra-1.11.1-36.fc35.src.rpm
>>> vips-8.11.3-1.fc35.src.rpm
>>>
>>> I'll start the rebuilds of those two.
>>>
>>> Zbyszek
>>>
>>> PS.
>>> At least in rawhide, OpenColorIO will fail because:
>>> Error:
>>>Problem: conflicting requests
>>> - nothing provides (python3.10dist(docutils) >= 0.16 with 
>>> python3.10dist(docutils) < 0.17) needed by 
>>> python3-sphinx-tabs-3.1.0-4.fc36.noarch
>>>
>>> :(
>> I've updated the Bodhi update with the new builds.
> Ooops, this is still borked:
> the side-tag and the update have OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-6.fc35,
> but OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35 is tagged into f35, so the update results
> in a downgrade.
>
> Should we
> a) try to tag OpenImageIO-2.2.17.0-7.fc35 into the side-tag and update
> b) rebuild OpenImageIO again
> c) do nothing?
>
> Richard, WDYT?
>
> Zbyszek

I'll try to rebuild OpenColorIO for f36, then I'll rebuild OpenImageIO.
Again. :-(

Mattia

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Fedora 35 compose report: 20211002.n.0 changes

2021-10-02 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-35-20211001.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20211002.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages:   10
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:4.06 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.03 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   963.57 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: rust-platform-dirs-0.2.0-4.fc35
Summary: Library for obtaining platform dependant directory paths for 
application
RPMs:rust-platform-dirs+default-devel rust-platform-dirs-devel
Size:21.97 KiB

Package: rust-platforms-0.2.1-4.fc35
Summary: Rust platform registry with information about valid Rust platforms
RPMs:rust-platforms+default-devel rust-platforms+serde-devel 
rust-platforms+std-devel rust-platforms-devel
Size:51.35 KiB

Package: rust-psutil-3.2.1-2.fc35
Summary: Process and system monitoring library
RPMs:rust-psutil+cpu-devel rust-psutil+default-devel 
rust-psutil+derive_more-devel rust-psutil+disk-devel rust-psutil+glob-devel 
rust-psutil+host-devel rust-psutil+memory-devel rust-psutil+network-devel 
rust-psutil+num_cpus-devel rust-psutil+platforms-devel 
rust-psutil+process-devel rust-psutil+renamed_serde-devel 
rust-psutil+sensors-devel rust-psutil+serde-devel rust-psutil+unescape-devel 
rust-psutil-devel
Size:187.19 KiB

Package: rust-ytop-0.6.2-6.fc35
Summary: TUI system monitor written in Rust
RPMs:ytop
Size:3.81 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  gnome-books-40.0-3.fc35
Old package:  gnome-books-40.0-2.fc35
Summary:  E-Book Manager
RPMs: gnome-books
Size: 1.59 MiB
Size change:  552 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Sep 29 2021 Jan Beran  - 40.0-3
  - Add Requires: tracker-miners for flatpak builds


Package:  gnome-terminal-3.42.0-1.fc35
Old package:  gnome-terminal-3.40.3-1.fc35
Summary:  Terminal emulator for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-terminal gnome-terminal-nautilus
Size: 6.59 MiB
Size change:  56.25 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Sep 28 2021 David King  - 3.42.0-1
  - Update to 3.42.0


Package:  kernel-5.14.9-300.fc35
Old package:  kernel-5.14.7-300.fc35
Summary:  The Linux kernel
RPMs: kernel kernel-core kernel-debug kernel-debug-core 
kernel-debug-devel kernel-debug-devel-matched kernel-debug-modules 
kernel-debug-modules-extra kernel-debug-modules-internal kernel-devel 
kernel-devel-matched kernel-doc kernel-lpae kernel-lpae-core kernel-lpae-devel 
kernel-lpae-devel-matched kernel-lpae-modules kernel-lpae-modules-extra 
kernel-lpae-modules-internal kernel-modules kernel-modules-extra 
kernel-modules-internal
Size: 532.83 MiB
Size change:  42.98 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 27 2021 Justin M. Forbes  [5.14.8-0]
  - thermal/drivers/int340x: Do not set a wrong tcc offset on resume (Antoine 
Tenart)

  * Thu Sep 30 2021 Justin M. Forbes  [5.14.9-0]
  - Revert "block, bfq: honor already-setup queue merges" (Jens Axboe)


Package:  kernel-headers-5.14.9-300.fc35
Old package:  kernel-headers-5.14.7-300.fc35
Summary:  Header files for the Linux kernel for use by glibc
RPMs: kernel-cross-headers kernel-headers
Size: 17.77 MiB
Size change:  6.52 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 27 2021 Justin M. Forbes  - 5.14.8-300
  - Linux v5.14.8

  * Thu Sep 30 2021 Justin M. Forbes  - 5.14.9-300
  - Linux v5.14.9


Package:  kernel-tools-5.14.9-300.fc35
Old package:  kernel-tools-5.14.7-300.fc35
Summary:  Assortment of tools for the Linux kernel
RPMs: bpftool kernel-tools kernel-tools-libs kernel-tools-libs-devel 
libperf libperf-devel perf python3-perf
Size: 23.20 MiB
Size change:  1.63 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Sep 27 2021 Justin M. Forbes  - 5.14.8-300
  - Linux v5.14.8

  * Thu Sep 30 2021 Justin M. Forbes  - 5.14.9-300
  - Linux v5.14.9


Package:  pipewire-0.3.38-1.fc35
Old package:  pipewire-0.3.37-1.fc35
Summary:  Media Sharing Server
RPMs: pipewire pipewire-alsa pipewire-devel pipewire-doc 
pipewire-gstreamer pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit 
pipewire-jack-audio-connection-kit-devel pipewire-libs pipewire-media-session 
pipewire-plugin-jack pipewire-pulseaudio pipewire-utils
Size: 417.42 MiB
Size change:  884.19 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 23 2021 Javier Martinez Canillas  - 0.3.37-2
  - Enable libcamera SPA plugin

  * Wed Sep 29 2021 Wim Taymans  - 0.3.37-3
  - Rebuild for new libcamera

  * Thu Sep 30 2021 Wim Taymans  - 0.3.38-1
  - Update version to 0.3.38


Package:  qt5-qttools-5.15.2-7.fc35
Old package:  qt5-qttools-5.15.2-6.fc35
Summary:  Qt5 - QtTool components
RPMs: qt5-assistant qt5-designer qt5-doctools qt5-linguist 
qt5-qdbusviewer qt5-qttools qt5-qttools-common qt5-qttools-devel 
qt5-qttools-examples qt5-qttools-libs-designer 
qt5-qttools-libs-designer

Re: Orphaning the cura-lulzbot package set

2021-10-02 Thread Thomas Daede

On 4/12/21 09:29, Miro Hrončok wrote:
P.S. I opened an upstream pull request to add support for the Lulzbot 
TAZ Pro and the Mini 2 in the main Cura codebase (still actively 
maintained). I would highly recommend that anyone considering reviving 
these packages devote their efforts in that direction instead.


Hey spot,
The packages are retired on rawhide now.

Should cura obsolete cura-lulzbot?



Upstream cura has its own config directory and is much newer, so I don't 
think that helps - it's essentially a different program.


I configured cura to work with my printer by setting up my printer as 
custom and copying the start/end gcode. As a bonus, the slicer is much 
newer and improved, so I don't think I'll miss cura-lulzbot. FAME 3D has 
actually opened a PR to cura now as well: 
https://github.com/Ultimaker/Cura/pull/10232


I did try to update lulzbot-marlin-firmware, but a) Lulzbot's forks are 
a disaster to unravel and b) the arduino package is retired in F35+. 
Instead, I used this firmware: 
https://github.com/drunken-octopus/drunken-octopus-marlin


Thomas
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Fedora-Rawhide-20211002.n.0 compose check report

2021-10-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud

Failed openQA tests: 7/206 (x86_64), 15/132 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1009910 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009910
ID: 1009919 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009919
ID: 1009969 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009969
ID: 1010285 Test: aarch64 universal install_xfs@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010285

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1009856 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009856
ID: 1009869 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009869
ID: 1009873 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009873
ID: 1009875 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009875
ID: 1009916 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009916
ID: 1009970 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso support_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009970
ID: 1009981 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_master@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009981
ID: 1009990 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_nfs_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009990
ID: 1009998 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_replica@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009998
ID: 1010004 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_cockpit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010004
ID: 1010005 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_freeipa_replication_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010005
ID: 1010007 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010007
ID: 1010016 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010016
ID: 1010021 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010021
ID: 1010116 Test: aarch64 universal install_cyrillic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010116
ID: 1010121 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_minimal_64bit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010121
ID: 1010127 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010127
ID: 1010151 Test: aarch64 universal install_arabic_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010151

Soft failed openQA tests: 4/206 (x86_64), 2/132 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1009890 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009890
ID: 1009932 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009932
ID: 1009933 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009933
ID: 1009944 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009944
ID: 1010010 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010010
ID: 1010028 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010028

Passed openQA tests: 195/206 (x86_64), 115/132 (aarch64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1009866 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009866
ID: 1009876 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009876
ID: 1009878 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso realmd_join_sssd
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009878
ID: 1009894 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009894
ID: 1009907 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso base_package_install_remove
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009907
ID: 1009921 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_printing
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009921
ID: 1009922 

Re: F35 Change: Switch to WirePlumber as the PipeWire session manage (late Self-Contained Change proposal)

2021-10-02 Thread Robert-André Mauchin

On 7/19/21 18:17, Ben Cotton wrote:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/WirePlumber

== Summary == PipeWire currently uses a simple example session
manager. This proposal is to move to the more powerful WirePlumber
session manager.

== Owner == * Name: [[User:Wtaymans| Wim Taymans]] * Email:
wim.taym...@gmail.com

== Detailed Description == PipeWire requires a session manager that
at least needs to implements the following features:

* create and configure detected devices in the system. This includes 
audio cards, video and bluetooth devices. * configure applications

and route audio/video to/from them to the devices and filters. * keep
track of prefered devices and volumes. * move audio/video streams
when devices appear and disappear.

PipeWire uses a simple example session manager with limited features 
and configuration options. The proposal is to move to WirePlumber.


WirePlumber is built on GNOME (GObject) technologies and has
bindings for most languages using GObject introspection.

WirePlumber allows one to implement many of the rules for setup and 
configuration using small LUA scripts, which are easier to maintain

and customize. These are some of the functions that are scriptable in
LUA:

* setup and configuration of the devices and streams. This includes 
deciding if devices and streams need to operate in 5.1 or stereo

mode, depending on the available devices. * routing of the streams
based on metadata of the streams (Roles) and overall state of the
system. * volume/mute restore of devices and streams


== Benefit to Fedora ==

PipeWire currently uses a simple example session manager with mostly 
hardcoded logic and rules. This proposal wants to replace the

session manager with a more advanced session manager, called
WirePlumber.

WirePlumber brings to following improvements

* Drop-in replacement session manager for PipeWire, implements the 
exact same features as the example session manager * built with

GObject, which provides a richer development experience and adds
bindings for most languages * extensible with loadable modules *
scriptable policy using small lua scripts * better integration with
desktop settings

The main benefits will be that this session manager would allow for 
more customization of the policy and rules. Initially we aim for

feature parity with the current solution and work on more features in
the next releases.

== Scope == * Proposal owners: This is a rather isolated changed.
Instead of starting the pipewire-media-session executable we would
need to package and start WirePlumber instead.

WirePlumber has been kept up to data with the features in the
example session manager and would need testing.

* Other developers: None. This is an isolated PipeWire change. *
Release engineering: A new systemd service will need to be activated 
in the default install. * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed

for this Change) * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this
Change) * Alignment with Objectives:

== Upgrade/compatibility impact == Should not cause any change.

== How To Test ==

Experience should be the same as before. Retest all audio testcases.


== User Experience == Should not cause any visible change.


== Dependencies == None.

== Contingency Plan == * Contingency mechanism: (What to do?  Who
will do it?): If the feature can not be completed we continue using
the existing pipewire-media-session. * Contingency deadline: N/A (not
a System Wide Change) * Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide
Change)


== Documentation == 
[WirePlumber](https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/pipewire/wireplumber)





Just switched to F35 beta, no sound card was detected, I had to get back
to pipewire-media-session to get sound again.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Fedora-Rawhide-20211001.n.0 compose check report

2021-10-02 Thread Alexander Bokovoy

On pe, 01 loka 2021, Fedora compose checker wrote:

Missing expected images:

Xfce raw-xz armhfp

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 43 required tests failed, 1 result missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud

Failed openQA tests: 15/206 (x86_64), 23/132 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20210930.n.0):

ID: 1008518 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_master
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1008518
ID: 1008528 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso 
server_role_deploy_domain_controller **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1008528
ID: 1008531 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_replica
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1008531
ID: 1008535 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_freeipa_replication_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1008535


All FreeIPA tests fail because resteasy-jaxb-provider is removed but it
is still required by dogtag. My understanding is that this is an
intermediate step which should have better be done in a sidetag. So we
can expect broken FreeIPA in Rawhide until this issue is solved by
Dogtag team.



--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Security / Identity Management Engineering
Red Hat Limited, Finland
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Fedora-35-20211002.n.0 compose check report

2021-10-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 7/141 (aarch64), 4/204 (x86_64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1010420 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010420
ID: 1010425 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_btrfs_preserve_home_uefi@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010425
ID: 1010442 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_service_manipulation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010442
ID: 1010485 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010485
ID: 1010542 Test: x86_64 universal install_pxeboot@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010542
ID: 1010564 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_software_raid@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010564

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-35-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1010378 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010378
ID: 1010381 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010381
ID: 1010467 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010467
ID: 1010490 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gedit@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010490
ID: 1010596 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010596

Soft failed openQA tests: 4/141 (aarch64), 4/204 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-35-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1010479 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010479

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-35-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1010352 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010352
ID: 1010394 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010394
ID: 1010395 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gedit
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010395
ID: 1010406 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010406
ID: 1010413 Test: aarch64 Minimal-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010413
ID: 1010470 Test: aarch64 Server-raw_xz-raw.xz 
install_arm_image_deployment_upload@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010470
ID: 1010497 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010497

Passed openQA tests: 130/141 (aarch64), 196/204 (x86_64)

New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-35-20211001.n.0):

ID: 1010462 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso base_package_install_remove@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010462
ID: 1010483 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010483
ID: 1010487 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz 
base_package_install_remove@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010487
ID: 1010593 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010593
ID: 1010603 Test: aarch64 universal install_repository_http_graphical@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010603

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Workstation-live-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.79 to 0.59
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009008#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010349#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default@uefi: 
Used swap changed from 5 MiB to 7 MiB
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009050#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010391#downloads

Installed system changes in test x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
Used mem changed from 917 MiB to 1020 MiB
Used swap changed from 8 MiB to 6 MiB
1 services(s) added since previous compose: fwupd.service
System load changed from 0.67 to 0.84
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009052#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010393#downloads

Installed system changes in test aarch64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.16 to 0.52
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1009081#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010422#downloads


-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___

PETSc/sundials updates

2021-10-02 Thread Antonio T. sagitter

Hi all.

PETSc-3.16.0 and Sundials-5.8.0 will be built in Rawhide not before one 
week.


PETSc release note: https://petsc.org/release/docs/changes/316/
Sundials release note: https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases/tag/v5.8.0

Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F
GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/


OpenPGP_0x29FBC85D7A51CC2F.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Review swap

2021-10-02 Thread Jerry James
The python-pydata-sphinx-theme package has a new dependency.  I need a
review for this simple python package:

python-sphinx-sitemap: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009987

Who would like to swap reviews?
-- 
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Review swap

2021-10-02 Thread Sandro Mani


On 02.10.21 19:40, Jerry James wrote:

The python-pydata-sphinx-theme package has a new dependency.  I need a
review for this simple python package:

python-sphinx-sitemap:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2009987

Who would like to swap reviews?


I'll take it. I've currently got up for review these to add to the mingw 
Qt6 stack:


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009214 - 
mingw-qt6-qtlocation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009215 - 
mingw-qt6-qtsensors
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009217 - 
mingw-qt6-qtserialport
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009221 - 
mingw-qt6-qtshadertools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009223 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009268 - 
mingw-qt6-qtmultimedia (depends on mingw-qt6-qtshadertools)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2009269 - 
mingw-qt6-qtwebchannel (depends on mingw-qt6-qtwebsockets)


Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Modularity: New modulemd-packager format for building modules

2021-10-02 Thread Orion Poplawski

On 9/10/21 6:26 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:

Good news, module maintainers.

I'm relieved to announce an availability of the new module packaging format,
modulemd-packager, version 3.



Question: is this necessary for all modules to migrate to this format, 
or is it primarily useful for modules that depend on other modules?



--
Orion Poplawski
he/him/his - surely the least important thing about me
Manager of NWRA Technical Systems  720-772-5637
NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane   or...@nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 https://www.nwra.com/



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Fedora-IoT-35-20211002.0 compose check report

2021-10-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210927.0):

ID: 1010812 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010812
ID: 1010826 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010826

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210927.0):

ID: 1010833 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010833

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210927.0):

ID: 1010818 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010818

Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Fedora-IoT-34-20211002.0 compose check report

2021-10-02 Thread Fedora compose checker
No missing expected images.

Failed openQA tests: 2/16 (x86_64), 1/15 (aarch64)

New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210916.0):

ID: 1010843 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010843
ID: 1010857 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_zezere_ignition
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010857

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210916.0):

ID: 1010864 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010864

Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)

Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-IoT-34-20210916.0):

ID: 1010849 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010849

Passed openQA tests: 13/16 (x86_64), 14/15 (aarch64)

Installed system changes in test x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload: 
System load changed from 0.41 to 0.14
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/986456#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010842#downloads

Installed system changes in test aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso 
install_default_upload@uefi: 
System load changed from 0.50 to 0.34
Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/986471#downloads
Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1010858#downloads
-- 
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure


Re: Slow download speed of RPMs updates

2021-10-02 Thread Mattia Verga via devel
On 02/10/21 15:35, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 at 03:48, Mattia Verga via devel
>  wrote:
>> Recently I've started seen a strange behavior of dnf while downloading
>> RPMs updates: some packages are downloaded at the usual speed of my
>> connection (ca. 10MBps), while other packages, in the same transaction,
>> shows really slow download speed (<100KBps).
>>
>> Does dnf uses different mirrors to download package updates in the same
>> transaction? Is there a way to show the mirror dnf downloads the updates
>> from? Running dnf in verbose mode doesn't show any clue.
>>
> dnf uses the same mirror until there is a complete timeout or a not
> found. It will then switch to another mirror
>
> Check the file /var/log/dnf.librepo.log to see if it is capturing the
> mirror. On mine it records info like:
>
> http://mirror.math.princeton.edu/pub/fedora/linux//updates/33/Modular/x86_64/repodata/f58e2b59bf551113cf566c6ef119900a3160de712ae1943f67fca42f05c23
> 0e9-updateinfo.xml.zck
> ...
> 2021-10-02T09:31:38-0400 INFO Downloading:
> http://packages.oit.ncsu.edu/fedora/linux//updates/33/Everything/x86_64/drpms/appstream-data-33-3.fc33_33-4.fc33.noarch.drpm

Thanks, that was really useful.

 From what I see in the logs, my dnf transactions usually use
http://fedora.mirror.garr.it/fedora/linux/ as mirror.

I then tried to download the metadata files with some simple wget calls
and I see random slow download speeds even here: by downloading the
-primary.xml.zck file I got 10.6MBps two times and 125KBps the third
time. By repeating the download multiple times I can see 1 out of three
or two times I have a slow speed download.

I don't see any problem with a couple of other mirrors I tried, so I
will try to contact the garr.it server admin...

Mattia


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure