Re: F36 Change: Default To Noto Fonts (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Akira TAGOH]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 7:45 PM Akira TAGOH  wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 4, 2022 at 11:07 PM Kevin Kofler via devel
>  wrote:
> > Another case is the math symbols: Should the default sans-serif math font be
> > changed to Noto Sans Math? STIX is a serif font, so it probably makes sense
> > to keep as the serif math font (also considering that there is, at least at
> > this time, no Noto Serif Math). For cases where the distinction matters,
> > see, e.g., the summation sign (clearly visible serifs), the integral sign
> > (dots at the ends that are a form of serifs), or the partial derivative sign
> > (constant stroke thickness in Noto Sans Math vs. variable in STIX).
>
> Good point. Yes, that makes sense. I'll update the proposal with it. thanks!

Unfortunately Noto Sans Math doesn't have enough coverage to represent
math (as und-zmth orthography defined in fontconfig). I won't do it
(even if I do, it won't be picked up as a math font) and keep STIX as
a default math font this time for all the generic families.

>
> >
> > Kevin Kofler
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
>
>
> --
> Akira TAGOH



-- 
Akira TAGOH
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 21:52 -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Adam Williamson  said:
> > I already cited one upthread - openvswitch integration. And possibly
> > ifup-pre , I haven't found a NetworkManager equivalent to that
> > mechanism yet, but I might be missing it.
> 
> Do you mean /sbin/ifup-pre-local?  If so, is there a difference between
> that and NM's dispatcher pre-up?  I can't find any documentation about
> the semantics of ifup-pre-local (just that it was called near the end of
> the ifup script).

Hmm, yeah, looks like that may be equivalent indeed. Not sure why I
didn't find it before. Thanks for the pointer.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 12, glibc 2.35) (late System-Wide Change proposal)

[Michel Alexandre Salim]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:05:26PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF36
> 
> == Summary ==
> Update the Fedora 36 GNU Toolchain to gcc 12 and glibc 2.35.
> 
> The gcc 12 is currently under development and will be included in
> Fedora 36 upon release. The glibc 2.35 change will be tracked in this
> top-level GNU Toolchain system-wide update.
> 
...
> 
> The GNU Binutils version 2.37 and GNU Debugger version 11.1 currently
> included in Fedora 35 will continue to be included in Fedora 36. There
> will be a GNU Binutils version 2.38 released at the end of January,
> but the inclusion will be scheduled for Fedora 37.
> 
What's the rationale behind holding these two back?

Best regards,

-- 
Michel Alexandre Salim
profile: https://keyoxide.org/mic...@michel-slm.name


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Chris Adams]

Once upon a time, Adam Williamson  said:
> I already cited one upthread - openvswitch integration. And possibly
> ifup-pre , I haven't found a NetworkManager equivalent to that
> mechanism yet, but I might be missing it.

Do you mean /sbin/ifup-pre-local?  If so, is there a difference between
that and NM's dispatcher pre-up?  I can't find any documentation about
the semantics of ifup-pre-local (just that it was called near the end of
the ifup script).

-- 
Chris Adams 
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Rawhide / systemd 250: kernel-install may place kernels and config in the wrong place

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 05:36:56PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
... snip ...
> So, my question is...do other Rawhide users have this problem, or is my
> system an outlier for some reason? I have not been able to figure out
> *what* created the problematic directories on my system. An earlier
> systemd rc may have created /boot/efi/(machine_id) if
> /boot/efi/loader/entries existed, but I don't know what might have
> created /boot/efi/loader/entries . I'm pretty sure I didn't do it
> myself, though.

I don't have those here at all on 2 rawhide laptops... one installed in
aug 2020 and one aug 2021.

I wonder if it's something to do with when they were installed?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change: Default To Noto Fonts (System-Wide Change proposal)

[Akira TAGOH]

On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 1:08 AM Neal Becker  wrote:
>
> After seeing this proposal I tried playing with Noto Sans Mono.  I
> find that while it comes with many weights, none look right to me.
> Language is English.
>
> I'm testing in emacs.  My usual default is Source code sans semibold
> and I find that very pleasing.  I also tried Dejavu Sans Mono
> semibold, which looks very similar.  But if I try Noto Sans Mono, no
> weight looks right.  Medium is too light, and the next weight,
> semibold, is too heavy.

Thank you for the feedback. one question just comes to mind.
Do you see any difference when you try it again with a non-variable
font of Noto Sans Mono?

>
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 9:59 PM Robert Marcano via devel
>  wrote:
> >
> > On 12/29/21 2:20 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 12:27 PM Artem Tim  wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Cantarell current default UI font in GNOME (Workstation) will be 
> > >> replaced by Noto font as well or remain?
> > >
> > > The current plan is to keep Cantarell for now, though GNOME upstream
> > > may decide to switch to Noto as KDE Plasma did years ago.
> > >
> >
> > Does Noto have the default font-variant-numeric as tabular-nums? (non
> > proportional decimal digits) because it will be a welcomed change.
> >
> > The current default of Cantarell makes any number showing application a
> > pain to style, specially on toolkits that use the system font but are
> > unable to change font variants (Java Swing with GTK Look and Feel).
> >
> > Even GNOME applications aren't properly styled for number entry use
> > cases. See for example Calculator where 111,111,111 looks like a smaller
> > number than 99,999,999 when the are one on top of the other, because the
> > font is proportional by default.
> > ___
> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > List Archives: 
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
>
>
> --
> Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure



-- 
Akira TAGOH
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037406] perl-HTTP-Message-6.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-de3b94ff16


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2034012] Please branch and build perl-FileHandle-Fmode for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034012

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-64c3a40474 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-64c3a40474

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034012
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032440] perl-JSON-MaybeXS for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-33dbf4029f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-33dbf4029f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032440
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037517] Please branch and build perl-PPIx-Regexp for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037517

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek  ---
Branch requested: https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/40526


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037517
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032425] perl-Moose for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6862c1aa73 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6862c1aa73

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033348] perl-Sub-Infix for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f6dfb22750 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-f6dfb22750

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033348
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033968] Add perl-Cpanel-JSON-XS to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033968

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e6cf28aee8 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e6cf28aee8

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033968
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031817] perl-Test-LeakTrace for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031817

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0f6cccaaa5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0f6cccaaa5

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031817
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2031815] perl-Regexp-Common for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b73496d98d has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b73496d98d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031815
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2033196] Please branch and build perl-Task-Weaken for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033196

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0772207078 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0772207078

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033196
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036429] Please branch and build perl-Want for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036429

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-646a191788 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-646a191788

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036429
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036499] Please branch and build perl-Browser-Open for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036499

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7f612ab312 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-7f612ab312

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036499
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #16: 6.36 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.36 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/16
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 1988862] perl-Dist-Zilla-6.024 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988862

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-82939b2e5d has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-82939b2e5d`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-82939b2e5d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1988862
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2027399] perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.082 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027399

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-d28f5de59c has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-d28f5de59c`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-d28f5de59c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2027399
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2026131] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9914 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026131



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-0dbe368a7d has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-0dbe368a7d`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-0dbe368a7d

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026131
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #16: 6.36 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that 
you are following:
``
6.36 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/16
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036432] perl-System-Info-0.062 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036432

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-94961cf140 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-94961cf140`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-94961cf140

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036432
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036779] perl-Term-Table-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-568b6a24bd has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-568b6a24bd`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-568b6a24bd

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2028263] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000144 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-073471d16f has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-073471d16f`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-073471d16f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037406] perl-HTTP-Message-6.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-b043e909e9


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2028239] perl-Locale-Codes-3.69 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028239



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-f425fa822a has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-f425fa822a`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f425fa822a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028239
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036426] perl-Data-Peek-0.51 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036426

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-6e71d3f983 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-6e71d3f983`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6e71d3f983

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036426
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2028263] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000144 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-9679443582 has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-9679443582`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9679443582

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2028239] perl-Locale-Codes-3.69 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028239

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-ef1d6ea57c has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-ef1d6ea57c`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ef1d6ea57c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028239
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2026131] perl-CPANPLUS-0.9914 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026131

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-ffd396f97a has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
--advisory=FEDORA-2022-ffd396f97a`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ffd396f97a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2026131
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #15: 6.36 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.36 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/15
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Adam Williamson]

On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 18:21 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:19 PM Demi Marie Obenour  
> wrote:
> > 
> > On 1/5/22 17:43, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > > On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > > I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
> > > 
> > > There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that 
> > > network-scripts
> > > does. If network-scripts is orphaned I'll probably pick it up.
> > 
> > Which use-cases are these?  Does systemd-networkd address them?
> 
> systemd-networkd has even *less* functionality than the legacy 
> network-scripts.
> 
> I am, however, curious what functionality exists in network-scripts
> that doesn't in NetworkManager, since most of the newer networking
> features were only implemented in ifcfg-rh on NetworkManager.

I already cited one upthread - openvswitch integration. And possibly
ifup-pre , I haven't found a NetworkManager equivalent to that
mechanism yet, but I might be missing it.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Rawhide / systemd 250: kernel-install may place kernels and config in the wrong place

[Adam Williamson]

Hey folks! So I looked into an interesting bug today where with systemd
250, kernel-install started installing kernels and config snippets to
the wrong place.

The bug happened on my system because it had, for some reason, these
directories:

/boot/efi/loader/entries
/boot/efi/(machine_id)

where (machine_id) is the machine ID from /etc/machine-id.

With systemd 250+, if either of those directories exists, kernel-
install will write the boot loader config snippets to
/boot/efi/loader/entries, but our grub2 config will not find them
there. It will *try* to write the kernel files themselves to a
subdirectory of /boot/efi/(machine_id); but if that directory doesn't
exist, it won't write them anywhere at all. Either way, you won't be
able to boot the new kernel.

What's supposed to happen is that the config snippets should get
written to /boot/loader/entries , and the kernel/initrd files installed
to /boot . If you don't have either of the directories listed above,
this should still happen and things should work OK.

So, my question is...do other Rawhide users have this problem, or is my
system an outlier for some reason? I have not been able to figure out
*what* created the problematic directories on my system. An earlier
systemd rc may have created /boot/efi/(machine_id) if
/boot/efi/loader/entries existed, but I don't know what might have
created /boot/efi/loader/entries . I'm pretty sure I didn't do it
myself, though.

I have a patch I can send for systemd to make this behave more like it
did previously (before 250, it checked /boot before /boot/efi when
deciding which layout was in use; 250 checks /boot/efi before /boot).
But it'd be useful to know how many people run into this. It'd also be
great if anyone knows how /boot/efi/loader/entries may have come to
exist on my system.

Thanks folks!
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #15: 6.36 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that 
you are following:
``
6.36 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/15
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #14: 6.36 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.36 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/14
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #14: 6.36 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that 
you are following:
``
6.36 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/14
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037406] perl-HTTP-Message-6.36 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek  ---
Changes:
6.36  2022-01-05 14:39:42Z
- Fix examples in HTTP::Request::Common synopsis: HTTP::Request::Common
  does not put headers in an arrayref, unlike HTTP::Request (GH#170) (Karen
  Etheridge)
- Update to contributing information (GH#171) (Håkon Hægland)

For f34, f35 and rawhide


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037406
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036779] perl-Term-Table-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-3e03a16093 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-3e03a16093


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Term-Table] PR #3: 0.016 bump and package tests

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Table` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
0.016 bump and package tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Table/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Term-Table] PR #3: 0.016 bump and package tests

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Table` that 
you are following:
``
0.016 bump and package tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Table/pull-request/3
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2036779] perl-Term-Table-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-568b6a24bd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-568b6a24bd


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Term-Table] PR #2: 0.016 bump and package tests

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Table` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
0.016 bump and package tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Table/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Term-Table] PR #2: 0.016 bump and package tests

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Table` that 
you are following:
``
0.016 bump and package tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Table/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: How do we announce new packages?

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 08:28:08PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> So ... something like:
> 
> - create a ticketing system for idea / text submissions (project with
> issue tracker on pagure?)
> - there, Fedora contributors can propose their cool new features /
> packages for inclusion in the next article
> - person / small group of people curate submissions, put together a
> final article, and propose it for Fedora Magazine
> 
> I admit that this *does* sound better than "yet-another-mailing-list",
> though it's probably more work :)


Yeah, that'd work. Another idea would be to rather than creating a new
ticketing system, put it alongside the Magazine article proposals with
#new-feature/#new-packages tag (instead of #article-idea or something).

Then, the Group 3 person could ... wait, actually. Let's continue this
discussion with the Fedora Magazine folks. Please join me over at
https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/idea-for-collecting-cool-new-features-cool-new-packages-article-ideas/35761


-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Term-Table] PR #1: 0.016 bump and package tests

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Table` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
 0.016 bump and package tests
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Table/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

[Maxwell G via devel]

On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 4:28:19 PM CST Inglis, Malcolm via devel wrote:
> I have two outstanding PRs that I think are hanging on uploading new sources 
> to the Lookaside Cache

I have experienced this issue myself and seen it happen to other newcomers 
several times. It nullifies the purpose of CI for a population that it can 
benefit the most. It is possible to run `fedpkg new-sources --offline`, which 
updates the `sources` file and `.gitignore` without actually touching the 
lookaside cache. This saves the package maintainer who merges the PR the 
trouble of creating another commit (they still have to run `fedpkg new-sources` 
to actually upload the tarball to the lookaside cahce), but the whole area 
still creates unnecessary friction. @msrb submitted a PR[1] to Fedora CI to fix 
the issue, but it was never merged.

[1]: https://github.com/fedora-ci/dist-git-build-pipeline/pull/25

-- 
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
PGP Key Fingerprint: f57c76e5a238fe0a628e2ecef79e4e25e8c661f8
PGP Keyserver: hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com
gotmax@e.email

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Neal Gompa]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 6:19 PM Demi Marie Obenour  wrote:
>
> On 1/5/22 17:43, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >> I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
> >
> > There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that 
> > network-scripts
> > does. If network-scripts is orphaned I'll probably pick it up.
>
> Which use-cases are these?  Does systemd-networkd address them?

systemd-networkd has even *less* functionality than the legacy network-scripts.

I am, however, curious what functionality exists in network-scripts
that doesn't in NetworkManager, since most of the newer networking
features were only implemented in ifcfg-rh on NetworkManager.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Demi Marie Obenour]

On 1/5/22 17:43, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> I'd say we want to get rid of both;)
> 
> There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that 
> network-scripts 
> does. If network-scripts is orphaned I'll probably pick it up.

Which use-cases are these?  Does systemd-networkd address them?
-- 
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)

OpenPGP_0xB288B55FFF9C22C1.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Term-Table] PR #1: 0.016 bump and package tests

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Term-Table` that 
you are following:
``
 0.016 bump and package tests
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Term-Table/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: How do we announce new packages?

[Fabio Valentini]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 10:18 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:29 PM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
> >
> > - create a ticketing system for idea / text submissions (project with
> > issue tracker on pagure?)
> > - there, Fedora contributors can propose their cool new features /
> > packages for inclusion in the next article
> > - person / small group of people curate submissions, put together a
> > final article, and propose it for Fedora Magazine
> >
> > I admit that this *does* sound better than "yet-another-mailing-list",
> > though it's probably more work :)
>
> The work (assuming we're just interested in new packages) could be
> shortcut a bit by looking at the SCM requests repo:
> https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issues
>
> This only gives you the new packages, not any useful text, which the
> maintainer might be better positioned to provide. Although you could
> just use the Description: from the spec file. But one person could
> probably put this together for the month in a relatively short time.
>
> Of course, if we want to include stuff beyond "here's the new
> packages", this breaks down. The ticket system approach is probably
> the best in that case, but the hard part is going to get people to
> remember to add to it.

Yeah, but just looking at "new" packages probably won't be enough
(whether getting the data from fedora-scm-requests, bodhi, or compose
reports, etc.). There's just too much low-level stuff getting added
all the time (and by that I mean packaging of new library
dependencies, to keep all applications happy and up-to-date), but most
of those "new" packages are not interesting to users at all.

Still, I'd hope that most people who worked on some cool new feature
for Fedora would want people to know about it? Opening a ticket to get
it included in a "Cool new stuff in Fedora this $MONTH" listicle seems
like a low barrier to get things out "to the world".

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2028263] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000144 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-9679443582 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 34.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9679443582


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora-Rawhide-20220104.n.0 compose check report

[Fedora compose checker]

No missing expected images.

Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
24 of 43 required tests failed, 17 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** 
below

Failed openQA tests: 102/228 (x86_64), 63/159 (aarch64)

Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220103.n.0):

ID: 1096184 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096184
ID: 1096195 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_repository_hd_variation
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096195
ID: 1096201 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096201
ID: 1096207 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096207
ID: 1096225 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096225
ID: 1096227 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096227
ID: 1096240 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096240
ID: 1096241 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso memory_check@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096241
ID: 1096244 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096244
ID: 1096245 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default_upload 
**GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096245
ID: 1096268 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default_upload **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096268
ID: 1096269 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_no_user **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096269
ID: 1096274 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096274
ID: 1096288 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso anaconda_help
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096288
ID: 1096312 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_selinux@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096312
ID: 1096323 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso anaconda_help@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096323
ID: 1096326 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096326
ID: 1096340 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vnc_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096340
ID: 1096341 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096341
ID: 1096352 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso 
install_repository_hd_variation@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096352
ID: 1096365 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_vncconnect_server@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096365
ID: 1096391 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096391
ID: 1096402 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096402
ID: 1096404 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096404
ID: 1096413 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_fprint
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096413
ID: 1096443 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096443
ID: 1096459 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096459
ID: 1096515 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096515
ID: 1096516 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096516
ID: 1096519 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_realmd_client
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096519
ID: 1096549 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096549
ID: 1096562 Test: aarch64 universal install_multi_empty@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096562
ID: 1096563 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_server_domain_controller@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096563
ID: 1096565 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096565
ID: 1096568 Test: aarch64 universal upgrade_2_realmd_client@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096568
ID: 1096569 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096569
ID: 1096570 Test: x86_64 Server-boot-iso install_default@uefi **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096570
ID: 1096571 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default **GATING**
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1096571
ID: 

[Bug 2036779] perl-Term-Table-0.016 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value



--- Comment #1 from Michal Josef Spacek  ---
Changes:
0.016 2022-01-03 12:56:51-08:00 America/Los_Angeles

- Be explicit about bareword filehandles

For f34, f35 and rawhide


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036779
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Michael Cronenworth]

On 1/5/22 2:17 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:

I'd say we want to get rid of both;)


There are use-cases that NetworkManager just doesn't support that network-scripts 
does. If network-scripts is orphaned I'll probably pick it up.


I have raised the use cases with upstream, but they haven't had time to address 
them. I suspect they won't unless I pony up patches, which I cannot commit the time.


There's nothing inherently wrong with network-scripts. They call the latest and 
greatest network command tools. I'd love to switch to NetworkManager, but we're not 
there yet.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 3ab6b538d05eb389321db4de9673b82c9036b690 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: May 30 2019 11:39:44 +
Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 91d064b..1ae3ede 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   14%{?dist}
+Release:   15%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu May 30 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.10-15
+- Perl 5.30 rebuild
+
 * Fri Feb 01 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-14
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/3ab6b538d05eb389321db4de9673b82c9036b690?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "Use author-independent source URL"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 902b14e97912fc66ac607fa2dff40da96ec562a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Oct 15 2019 14:45:03 +
Subject: Use author-independent source URL


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.rpmlintrc b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.rpmlintrc
new file mode 100644
index 000..453c00b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.rpmlintrc
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+from Config import *
+addFilter("spelling-error %description -l en_US BlockCipher -> ")
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 254103c..84fcfbc 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ Name:   perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
 Release:   16%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
-Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
-Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
+URL:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
+Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/modules/by-module/Crypt/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
 # Build
 BuildRequires: coreutils
 BuildRequires: findutils



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/902b14e97912fc66ac607fa2dff40da96ec562a5?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 8fbe9ab0cef27fac0cfaceba85daa572ed5b3987 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 26 2019 01:43:20 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 1ae3ede..254103c 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   15%{?dist}
+Release:   16%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 26 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-16
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu May 30 2019 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.10-15
 - Perl 5.30 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/8fbe9ab0cef27fac0cfaceba85daa572ed5b3987?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 38535d76945811e9e3698d9f535c06c123f8b56c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 13 2018 16:34:16 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 4d55f0a..513ff5c 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   12%{?dist}
+Release:   13%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-13
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Wed Jun 27 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.10-12
 - Perl 5.28 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/38535d76945811e9e3698d9f535c06c123f8b56c?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 8fbb351c23e15975b113bfee72509457332945ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Feb 01 2019 19:32:47 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 513ff5c..91d064b 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   13%{?dist}
+Release:   14%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Fri Feb 01 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-14
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-13
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/8fbb351c23e15975b113bfee72509457332945ad?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 11ba8e64ec05c0926d15170ad556c4d98efe9abd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař 
Date: Jun 04 2018 12:17:14 +
Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN 



---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 6e34701..9e98fa7 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@ Name:   perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
 Release:   11%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
-Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
-Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
+Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
+Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
 # Build
 BuildRequires: coreutils
 BuildRequires: findutils



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/11ba8e64ec05c0926d15170ad556c4d98efe9abd?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 99bfcd9b535a7a17a7a50fbfbc43b1e1107fba58 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 27 2018 20:06:34 +
Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 9e98fa7..4d55f0a 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   11%{?dist}
+Release:   12%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Url:   https://metacpan.org/release/Crypt-IDEA
 Source0:   
https://cpan.metacpan.org/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Wed Jun 27 2018 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.10-12
+- Perl 5.28 rebuild
+
 * Tue Feb 20 2018 Paul Howarth  - 1.10-11
 - BR: gcc
 - Remove some legacy cruft



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/99bfcd9b535a7a17a7a50fbfbc43b1e1107fba58?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "BR: gcc (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 5562b19740c54a9fe57c4d784bf971afa7b7c92c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Feb 20 2018 14:01:24 +
Subject: BR: gcc


Also remove some legacy cruft
- Drop BuildRoot: and Group: tags
- Drop explicit %clean section
- Drop explicit buildroot cleaning in %install section

---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 21086b2..6e34701 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,18 +1,18 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   10%{?dist}
+Release:   11%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
-Group: Development/Libraries
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
 Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
 # Build
 BuildRequires: coreutils
 BuildRequires: findutils
+BuildRequires: gcc
 BuildRequires: make
-BuildRequires: perl-interpreter
 BuildRequires: perl-devel
 BuildRequires: perl-generators
+BuildRequires: perl-interpreter
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
 BuildRequires: sed
 # Module Runtime
@@ -45,11 +45,10 @@ perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}"
 make %{?_smp_mflags}
 
 %install
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
 make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -delete
 find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
-%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
+%{_fixperms} -c %{buildroot}
 
 %check
 make test
@@ -66,6 +65,13 @@ make test
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Tue Feb 20 2018 Paul Howarth  - 1.10-11
+- BR: gcc
+- Remove some legacy cruft
+  - Drop BuildRoot: and Group: tags
+  - Drop explicit %%clean section
+  - Drop explicit buildroot cleaning in %%install section
+
 * Thu Feb 08 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-10
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/5562b19740c54a9fe57c4d784bf971afa7b7c92c?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "Remove %clean section (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 5159d54c70ef044da763263ca8c2c0ccf8fcc5d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Igor Gnatenko 
Date: Feb 14 2018 06:26:15 +
Subject: Remove %clean section


None of currently supported distributions need that.
Last one was EL5 which is EOL for a while.

Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko 

---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 3e69302..21086b2 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -54,9 +54,6 @@ find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
 %check
 make test
 
-%clean
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-
 %files
 %if 0%{?_licensedir:1}
 %license COPYRIGHT



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/5159d54c70ef044da763263ca8c2c0ccf8fcc5d9?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 4b9039c5c7e009aa5a1147f10b03623625762b47 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Feb 08 2018 19:58:36 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild


Signed-off-by: Fedora Release Engineering 

---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 398cbeb..7f8abdb 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   9%{?dist}
+Release:   10%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Feb 08 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-10
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Aug 03 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-9
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/4b9039c5c7e009aa5a1147f10b03623625762b47?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "Remove BuildRoot definition (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 7f44176c171e1e3d2791173ac7a878046292a819 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Igor Gnatenko 
Date: Feb 13 2018 23:53:29 +
Subject: Remove BuildRoot definition


None of currently supported distributions need that.
It was needed last for EL5 which is EOL now

Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko 

---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 7f8abdb..3e69302 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@ License:BSD with advertising
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
 Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
-BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
 # Build
 BuildRequires: coreutils
 BuildRequires: findutils



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/7f44176c171e1e3d2791173ac7a878046292a819?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From da79a449d0c775b483db5dbf4bb514bfd5d770ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Aug 03 2017 05:07:18 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for 
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index d22ee23..398cbeb 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   8%{?dist}
+Release:   9%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Aug 03 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-9
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Binutils_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-8
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/da79a449d0c775b483db5dbf4bb514bfd5d770ee?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "Initial import (perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.10-5) (..more)"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From a300a950c615a4111a628a79e5d2ee7833f30d37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Howarth 
Date: Nov 15 2016 15:36:58 +
Subject: Initial import (perl-Crypt-IDEA-1.10-5)


This perl extension is an implementation of the IDEA block cipher algorithm.
The module implements the Crypt::BlockCipher interface.

This implementation is copyright Systemics Ltd (http://www.systemics.com/).

---

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index e69de29..ebb8afd 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+/Crypt-IDEA-1.10.tar.gz
diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
new file mode 100644
index 000..55fc486
--- /dev/null
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
+Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
+Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
+Version:   1.10
+Release:   5%{?dist}
+License:   BSD with advertising
+Group: Development/Libraries
+Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
+Source0:   
http://search.cpan.org/CPAN/authors/id/D/DP/DPARIS/Crypt-IDEA-%{version}.tar.gz
+BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
+# Build
+BuildRequires: coreutils
+BuildRequires: findutils
+BuildRequires: make
+BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl-devel
+BuildRequires: perl-generators
+BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: sed
+# Module Runtime
+BuildRequires: perl(Carp)
+BuildRequires: perl(DynaLoader)
+BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
+BuildRequires: perl(strict)
+# Test Suite
+BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
+# Dependencies
+Requires:  perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`perl -V:version`"; echo $version))
+
+# Don't provide private perl libs
+%{?perl_default_filter}
+
+%description
+This perl extension is an implementation of the IDEA block cipher algorithm.
+The module implements the Crypt::BlockCipher interface.
+
+This implementation is copyright Systemics Ltd (http://www.systemics.com/).
+
+%prep
+%setup -q -n Crypt-IDEA-%{version}
+
+# Remove unnecessary shellbang that points to the wrong perl interpreter anyway
+sed -i -e '\|^#! */usr/local/bin/perl |d' IDEA.pm
+
+%build
+perl Makefile.PL INSTALLDIRS=vendor OPTIMIZE="%{optflags}"
+make %{?_smp_mflags}
+
+%install
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
+make pure_install DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name .packlist -delete
+find %{buildroot} -type f -name '*.bs' -empty -delete
+%{_fixperms} %{buildroot}
+
+%check
+make test
+
+%clean
+rm -rf %{buildroot}
+
+%files
+%if 0%{?_licensedir:1}
+%license COPYRIGHT
+%else
+%doc COPYRIGHT
+%endif
+%doc changes
+%{perl_vendorarch}/Crypt/
+%{perl_vendorarch}/auto/Crypt/
+%{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
+
+%changelog
+* Tue Nov 15 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.10-5
+- IDEA patent expired, import from RPM Fusion
+
+* Tue Jul 26 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.10-4
+- BR: perl-devel
+
+* Wed Jul  6 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.10-3
+- Classify buildreqs by usage
+- Simplify find commands using -empty and -delete
+- Use %%license where possible
+
+* Sun Aug 31 2014 Sérgio Basto  - 1.10-2
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_21_22_Mass_Rebuild
+
+* Sun Aug  4 2013 Paul Howarth  - 1.10-1
+- Update to 1.10
+  - Made SvUPGRADE a statement
+  - Corrected VERSION statement
+  - Fixed _idea.c for Strawberry
+
+* Sun Mar 03 2013 Nicolas Chauvet  - 1.08-11
+- Mass rebuilt for Fedora 19 Features
+
+* Tue Jul 17 2012 Paul Howarth  - 1.08-10
+- Perl 5.16 rebuild
+- Drop BR: perl(DynaLoader) - not dual-lived
+
+* Wed May  2 2012 Paul Howarth  - 1.08-9
+- Spec clean-up:
+  - Don't need to remove empty directories from buildroot
+  - Drop %%defattr, redundant since rpm 4.4
+
+* Thu Feb 16 2012 Paul Howarth  - 1.08-8
+- Spec clean-up:
+  - Don't use macros for commands
+  - Use DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT
+  - Use %%{_fixperms} macro rather than our own chmod incantation
+  - One buildreq per line
+  - Add buildreqs for Perl core modules that might be dual-lived
+
+* Wed Feb 08 2012 Nicolas Chauvet  - 1.08-7
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild
+
+* Wed Sep 28 2011 Nicolas Chauvet  - 1.08-6
+- Rebuilt for perl
+
+* Tue Aug 24 2010 Paul Howarth  1.08-5
+- Rebuild for Perl 5.12.1
+
+* Wed Feb  3 2010 Paul Howarth  1.08-4
+- Rebuild for Perl 5.10.1
+- Filter bogus provides for shared objects
+
+* Sun Mar 29 2009 Thorsten Leemhuis  1.08-3
+- Rebuild for new F11 features
+
+* Wed Jan 21 2009 Paul Howarth  1.08-2
+- Include "changes" file in documentation
+- Use a different delimiter for sed command in %%prep to improve readability
+
+* Thu Nov 27 2008 Paul Howarth  1.08-1
+- Update to 1.08
+- Clean up for submission to RPM Fusion
+  (http://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=195)
+
+* Fri Dec  2 2005 Paul Howarth  1.02-1
+- Initial build
diff --git a/sources b/sources
index e69de29..ae8886b 100644
--- a/sources
+++ b/sources
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+0284334d0d3e18543f17830aa00d  Crypt-IDEA-1.10.tar.gz

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From a3f8993b2c036a8c94b999d121b308063851882a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Jul 27 2017 03:12:40 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 4a435c4..d22ee23 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   7%{?dist}
+Release:   8%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Thu Jul 27 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-8
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Sun Jun 04 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.10-7
 - Perl 5.26 rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/a3f8993b2c036a8c94b999d121b308063851882a?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 9a11034e9b4a956ff713dd720576ffe03c46dd70 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Petr Písař 
Date: Jul 12 2017 13:04:44 +
Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter 



---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 6436312..4a435c4 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ BuildRoot:
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(id -nu)
 BuildRequires: coreutils
 BuildRequires: findutils
 BuildRequires: make
-BuildRequires: perl
+BuildRequires: perl-interpreter
 BuildRequires: perl-devel
 BuildRequires: perl-generators
 BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/9a11034e9b4a956ff713dd720576ffe03c46dd70?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 820d68d5382405253bd8dc22daddd8a69b21b755 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova 
Date: Jun 04 2017 14:52:29 +
Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 55385b6..6436312 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   6%{?dist}
+Release:   7%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Sun Jun 04 2017 Jitka Plesnikova  - 1.10-7
+- Perl 5.26 rebuild
+
 * Sat Feb 11 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-6
 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/820d68d5382405253bd8dc22daddd8a69b21b755?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Crypt-IDEA (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild"

[notifications]

Notification time stamped 2022-01-04 15:55:33 UTC

From 5bd2b51122d53781770d739f9dfe9c0115e819e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering 
Date: Feb 11 2017 02:19:27 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild


---

diff --git a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
index 55fc486..55385b6 100644
--- a/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
+++ b/perl-Crypt-IDEA.spec
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Summary:   Perl interface to IDEA block cipher
 Name:  perl-Crypt-IDEA
 Version:   1.10
-Release:   5%{?dist}
+Release:   6%{?dist}
 License:   BSD with advertising
 Group: Development/Libraries
 Url:   http://search.cpan.org/dist/Crypt-IDEA/
@@ -70,6 +70,9 @@ rm -rf %{buildroot}
 %{_mandir}/man3/Crypt::IDEA.3*
 
 %changelog
+* Sat Feb 11 2017 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.10-6
+- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
+
 * Tue Nov 15 2016 Paul Howarth  - 1.10-5
 - IDEA patent expired, import from RPM Fusion
 



https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Crypt-IDEA/c/5bd2b51122d53781770d739f9dfe9c0115e819e2?branch=epel9
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #15: 0.000144 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
0.000144 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/15
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Mic recording issues from browsers

[Pawel Veselov]

On Sun, Jan 2, 2022 at 7:33 PM stan via devel
 wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jan 2022 02:00:34 +0100
> Pawel Veselov  wrote:
> > Greetings!
> > I've been banging my head against this wall for a while now, and would
> > really appreciate some pointers.
> >
> > I can no longer record Google Meet meetings using RecordRTC
> > (https://www.webrtc-experiment.com/RecordRTC/). This promptly became a
> > problem once I upgraded from F33 to F35. I'm fairly certain this has
> > therefore something to do with PipeWire. The problem occurs on every
> > browser I've tried, including Chrome and Firefox. The symptoms is that
> > though my audio comes through clearly to other meeting participants,
> > my recording of my own voice is at the minimum chopped off, and at
> > worst is mostly silence with occasional blips of syllable fragments.
> > The audio coming from other participants is recorded correctly.
> I have very little understanding of pipewire and no understanding of
> RecordRTC.  But I have a couple of suggetions you could try.
>
> You could try installing wireplumber, if it isn't already installed, to
> see if it fixes the issue.

Yeah, that didn't help.

> You could try using obs-studio (available from rpmfusion) to record the
> session instead of RecordRTC (not sure how that fits with your
> workflow).

Thank you. First, I figured if I'm to use a native recorder, I can use
vokoscreenNG.
However, when I tried a full test - with the mic and the audio
monitor, I ran into exactly the same problem - the "monitor" stream is
recorded fine, but the mic stream is practically missing. Which is
good, because then this problem seems to be about recording from more
than one source at the same time, and I can debug this with
vokoscreenNG, rather than with Chrome, and with a much simpler
reproduction path.

However, I also did try obs-studio, and yes, it's a lot more
complicated than what I need from it at the moment, but amazingly it
works. So great, now I can also try to understand how come it does
when others don't.

RecordRTC is best suited for what I want since it lets me capture the
contents of a tab, at least in Chrome, but I can limp on obs-studio
until I figured this out.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Self Introduction: Malcolm Inglis (mcinglis)

[Inglis, Malcolm via devel]

Is someone willing to sponsor me into the `packager` group? I'd appreciate it!

(I was bouncing around the documentation for that, but it seems there's no 
formalized process currently - sorry if I missed something)

I have two outstanding PRs that I think are hanging on uploading new sources to 
the Lookaside Cache: 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nfs-utils/pull-request/10 , 
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libesmtp/pull-request/1

I've been, and hope to continue, contributing small fixes for various packages 
that I've noticed while working on AL packaging, and in regular personal usage. 
Over time, I hope to do more.

Cheers

On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 02:11:15 +, Malcolm Inglis wrote:
> Hi Fedora developers,
>
> I’m looking to join your ranks  I’ve made
> https://pagure.io/user/mcinglis/requests?type=filed=all
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/user/mcinglis/requests?type=filed=all PRs
> already, and had mistakenly skipped this important step of introducing myself.
>
> I’m a senior software engineer on the Amazon Linux team at AWS. I’m working on
> the infrastructure and tooling we use for AL packaging, and on maintenance of
> our user-space packages. I joined the AL team in Q3 2021 with much excitement
> for our direction regarding https://aws.amazon.com/linux/amazon-linux-2022/ 
> and
> Fedora collaboration, and am continuing to support that direction internally.
> I’ve been at Amazon since 2016, having worked in internal developer tools
> organization for the majority of that time, specifically on the massive
> internal build system and on enabling AWS deployments for Amazon’s developers.
> Prior to Amazon, I’ve worked on software for solar power system logging and
> control, and on CRUD web development projects. I studied software engineering
> and mathematics at the University of Queensland for several years.
>
> I’ve ran Fedora (Silverblue) as my daily driver on my laptop since at least
> 2011, though I experiment and dual boot various other distros on other 
> machines
> (big fan of Guix, Alpine and OpenBSD). Fedora’s always been my trusty
> workhorse, though, and I’m ashamed that it’s taken me this long to start
> contributing to the project that I’ve gotten so much value from. Better late
> than never!
>
> I live in Newcastle, WA, USA, and have lived in the Seattle area for the past
> six years. I’m originally from Brisbane, Australia. I have a
> http://minglis.id.au/ that’s been gathering dust, but am hoping to get around
> to that soon. Outside of software which I read and nerd about perhaps too 
> much,
> I love going places and doing things with my family. I enjoy reading science
> fiction and history. I am interested in futurism, space exploration and
> human-scale urban design, and appreciate good coffee and dry wine.
>
> Excited to get to work with you all,
>
> Malcolm.

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: List of packages with problematic license

[Richard Fontana]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 3:45 PM Jilayne Lovejoy  wrote:
>
> There were some license combinations (could be AND, OR, or WITH) that
> are on the "good" list but a different combination might need separate
> approval.
>
> Off top of head, I think any L/GPL WITH [exception] would fall into the
> category of needing to be capture as the full license expression since
> the specific exception would need to be reviewed and approved and would
> be different text than another exception.
>
> But for any combination of previously approved license for Fedora -
> e.g., "MIT OR GPL-2.0-only", "Apache-2.0 AND BSD-3-Clause" and so on -
> separate listings would not be necessary - agreed?
>
> (and this concept needs to be documented... adding to the list of items
> to better document)
>
> >
> > However, in many cases Fedora is ok with combining something with
> > GPL-2.0-or-later with BSD-3-Clause using AND.  The good list we've been
> > working through has some of these expressions that are a license token
> > and
> > then a WITH qualifier.  So this may be more about ensuring that a WITH
> > clause
> > isn't noted as approved without also requiring the main token.
> See above. Also, as per SPDX License List expression syntax (found in an
> appendix to the SPDX spec), you have to have a valid license ID on the
> left side of the WITH operator and a valid exception ID on the right
> side (as one would expect)

In related internal work being done largely by Bryan Sutula and
Russell Gelvin on certain Red Hat products, there's been an effort to
review for approval exceptions (what SPDX would consider exceptions)
identified mainly through ScanCode Toolkit. I believe a given
exception text will be approved basically without regard to the
license it is associated with. If you look at the current Fedora good
list, the impression is that there are a small number of uses of
exceptions out there used with particular licenses (I think in all
cases, licenses in the GPL family). But as Bryan and Russell have been
finding, the actual picture is much bigger and more complex. I am
pretty sure I've seen cases where an exception normally used with GPL
version 2 is used with LGPL version 2.x.

This reminds me that not too long ago I suggested that Fedora abandon
any effort to note the existence of (permissive) exceptions in license
tags, as being too much work for dubious gain beyond classification
for the sake of classification. But the anticipated switch to SPDX
identifiers raises the issue of what the license tag is actually
*for*, and how much detail or specificity it ought to embody, since
SPDX identifiers permit and in a sense encourage a relatively high
level of detail of license description. That's a whole other topic but
something I think has to be addressed as well. We might be assuming
now that license tags ought to have as much detail as possible
(something akin to a human review of the output of a scanner like
ScanCode Toolkit on the files in a source tarball, with only limited
processing); this isn't the approach consistently taken by Fedora
packagers today.

Richard
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

F36 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 12, glibc 2.35) (late System-Wide Change proposal)

[Ben Cotton]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF36

== Summary ==
Update the Fedora 36 GNU Toolchain to gcc 12 and glibc 2.35.

The gcc 12 is currently under development and will be included in
Fedora 36 upon release. The glibc 2.35 change will be tracked in this
top-level GNU Toolchain system-wide update.


== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:submachine| Arjun Shankar]]
* Email: ar...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
The GNU Compiler Collection, GNU C Library, GNU Debugger, and GNU
Binary Utilities make up the core part of the GNU Toolchain and it is
useful for our users to transition these components as a complete
implementation when making a new release of Fedora.

The GNU Compiler Collection is expected to release version 12 in Q2,
before the Fedora 36 release. It will contain many new features,
documented here: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html. The latest
point release for gcc 12 will be included in Fedora 36, this will most
probably be 12.1.

The GNU C Library version 2.35 is expected to be released in the
beginning of February 2022; we have started closely tracking the glibc
2.35 development code in Fedora Rawhide and are addressing any issues
as they arise. Given the present schedule Fedora 36 will branch after
the release of glibc 2.35. However, the mass rebuild schedule means
Fedora 36 will mass rebuild (if required) before the final release of
glibc 2.35, but after the ABI is frozen.

The GNU Binutils version 2.37 and GNU Debugger version 11.1 currently
included in Fedora 35 will continue to be included in Fedora 36. There
will be a GNU Binutils version 2.38 released at the end of January,
but the inclusion will be scheduled for Fedora 37.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
Stays up to date with latest features, improvements, security and bug
fixes from gcc, glibc, binutils, and gdb upstream.

The goal is to track and transition to the latest components of the
GNU Toolchain.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Fedora Toolchain Team (gcc, glibc, binutils, gdb,
...) developers need to ensure that gcc, glibc, binutils, and gdb in
rawhide are stable and ready for the Fedora 36 branch.
* Other developers: Given that glibc is backwards compatible and we
have been testing the new glibc in rawhide it should make very little
impact when updated, except for the occasional deprecation warnings
and removal of legacy interfaces from public header files.  An update
to GCC 12.1 would mean a new major release and could have broad scope
for change.

* Release engineering: A mass rebuild is strongly encouraged;
[https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10515]

* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives: N/A


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
The compiler, the static linker and the the library are backwards
compatible with the previous version of Fedora.

The upgrade to glibc-2.35 coincides with the
[[Changes/RemoveNSCD|removal of nscd]].

Some source changes may be required for gcc 12 rebase:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html



== How To Test ==
The GNU Compiler Collection has its own testsuite which is run during
the package build and examined by the gcc developers before being
uploaded.

The GNU C Library has its own testsuite, which is run during the
package build and examined by the glibc developers before being
uploaded. This test suite has over 6200 tests that run to verify the
correct operation of the library. In the future we may also run the
microbenchmark to look for performance regressions.


== User Experience ==
Users will see improved performance, many bugfixes and improvements to
POSIX compliance, Unicode 14 support, C.UTF-8 locale support, improved
experimental support for C++20 and C++23, new compiler warnings and
improvements to existing ones, and more.


== Dependencies ==

All packages do not need to be rebuilt due to backwards compatibility.
However, it is advantageous if a mass rebuild is performed during the
Fedora 36 cycle. The mass rebuild would ensure all packages can be
built with the newer compiler and core runtime.


== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism glibc: If glibc 2.35 proves too disruptive to
compiling the distribution we could revert to 2.34, but given that
Rawhide has started tracking glibc 2.35, no show-stopper problems are
expected.  At this point, we can still revert to upstream version 2.34
if insurmountable problems appear, but to do so may require a mass
rebuild to remove new symbols from the ABI/API.
* Contingency mechanism for gcc: If gcc 12 proves too disruptive to
compiling the distribution we could revert to gcc 11.
* Contingency deadline: Fedora mass rebuild on 2022-01-19.
* Blocks release? Yes, upgrading to the gcc 12 release blocks the
release. Yes, upgrading to glibc 2.35 does block the release.


== Documentation ==
The gcc manual contains the documentation for the release and doesn't
need any more additional work.

The glibc manual contains the 

F36 Change: GNU Toolchain Update (gcc 12, glibc 2.35) (late System-Wide Change proposal)

[Ben Cotton]

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GNUToolchainF36

== Summary ==
Update the Fedora 36 GNU Toolchain to gcc 12 and glibc 2.35.

The gcc 12 is currently under development and will be included in
Fedora 36 upon release. The glibc 2.35 change will be tracked in this
top-level GNU Toolchain system-wide update.


== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:submachine| Arjun Shankar]]
* Email: ar...@redhat.com


== Detailed Description ==
The GNU Compiler Collection, GNU C Library, GNU Debugger, and GNU
Binary Utilities make up the core part of the GNU Toolchain and it is
useful for our users to transition these components as a complete
implementation when making a new release of Fedora.

The GNU Compiler Collection is expected to release version 12 in Q2,
before the Fedora 36 release. It will contain many new features,
documented here: https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html. The latest
point release for gcc 12 will be included in Fedora 36, this will most
probably be 12.1.

The GNU C Library version 2.35 is expected to be released in the
beginning of February 2022; we have started closely tracking the glibc
2.35 development code in Fedora Rawhide and are addressing any issues
as they arise. Given the present schedule Fedora 36 will branch after
the release of glibc 2.35. However, the mass rebuild schedule means
Fedora 36 will mass rebuild (if required) before the final release of
glibc 2.35, but after the ABI is frozen.

The GNU Binutils version 2.37 and GNU Debugger version 11.1 currently
included in Fedora 35 will continue to be included in Fedora 36. There
will be a GNU Binutils version 2.38 released at the end of January,
but the inclusion will be scheduled for Fedora 37.

== Benefit to Fedora ==
Stays up to date with latest features, improvements, security and bug
fixes from gcc, glibc, binutils, and gdb upstream.

The goal is to track and transition to the latest components of the
GNU Toolchain.


== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: Fedora Toolchain Team (gcc, glibc, binutils, gdb,
...) developers need to ensure that gcc, glibc, binutils, and gdb in
rawhide are stable and ready for the Fedora 36 branch.
* Other developers: Given that glibc is backwards compatible and we
have been testing the new glibc in rawhide it should make very little
impact when updated, except for the occasional deprecation warnings
and removal of legacy interfaces from public header files.  An update
to GCC 12.1 would mean a new major release and could have broad scope
for change.

* Release engineering: A mass rebuild is strongly encouraged;
[https://pagure.io/releng/issue/10515]

* Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
* Alignment with Objectives: N/A


== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
The compiler, the static linker and the the library are backwards
compatible with the previous version of Fedora.

The upgrade to glibc-2.35 coincides with the
[[Changes/RemoveNSCD|removal of nscd]].

Some source changes may be required for gcc 12 rebase:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-12/changes.html



== How To Test ==
The GNU Compiler Collection has its own testsuite which is run during
the package build and examined by the gcc developers before being
uploaded.

The GNU C Library has its own testsuite, which is run during the
package build and examined by the glibc developers before being
uploaded. This test suite has over 6200 tests that run to verify the
correct operation of the library. In the future we may also run the
microbenchmark to look for performance regressions.


== User Experience ==
Users will see improved performance, many bugfixes and improvements to
POSIX compliance, Unicode 14 support, C.UTF-8 locale support, improved
experimental support for C++20 and C++23, new compiler warnings and
improvements to existing ones, and more.


== Dependencies ==

All packages do not need to be rebuilt due to backwards compatibility.
However, it is advantageous if a mass rebuild is performed during the
Fedora 36 cycle. The mass rebuild would ensure all packages can be
built with the newer compiler and core runtime.


== Contingency Plan ==
* Contingency mechanism glibc: If glibc 2.35 proves too disruptive to
compiling the distribution we could revert to 2.34, but given that
Rawhide has started tracking glibc 2.35, no show-stopper problems are
expected.  At this point, we can still revert to upstream version 2.34
if insurmountable problems appear, but to do so may require a mass
rebuild to remove new symbols from the ABI/API.
* Contingency mechanism for gcc: If gcc 12 proves too disruptive to
compiling the distribution we could revert to gcc 11.
* Contingency deadline: Fedora mass rebuild on 2022-01-19.
* Blocks release? Yes, upgrading to the gcc 12 release blocks the
release. Yes, upgrading to glibc 2.35 does block the release.


== Documentation ==
The gcc manual contains the documentation for the release and doesn't
need any more additional work.

The glibc manual contains the 

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #15: 0.000144 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that 
you are following:
``
0.000144 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/15
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change: Django 4.0 (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Elliott Sales de Andrade]

On Wed, 5 Jan 2022 at 11:26, Ben Cotton  wrote:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Django4.0
>
> == Summary ==
> Update Django to version 4.0.
>
> == Owner ==
> * Name: [[User:mrunge| Matthias Runge]]
> * Email: mru...@redhat.com
>
>
> == Detailed Description ==
>
> The Django project has regular releases about every 9 months. Django
> 4.0 is a major milestone, and this Change will
> bring the Fedora included version to the latest version.
>
> The immediate step is to bump the python-django package to version
> 4.0. It is expected, that dependent packages will be
> updated as well, or retired, if they haven't seen an update for long time.
>
>
> == Benefit to Fedora ==
>
> This updates to the latest Django version and allows to use the
> distribution provided version to be used both in new developments and
> also with latest Django applications.
>
> The upstream project has more info on what's new
> https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2021/dec/07/django-40-released/
>
> The risk of not completing this change is that the next update will be
> more disruptive, Django 4.1 is planned for about the same time as
> Fedora 37 will land.
>
> == Scope ==
> * Proposal owners: python-django will be updated to version 4.0.
> * Other developers:
> Other developers or maintainers will have to test their packages with
> Django 4.0.
> * Release engineering:
> * Policies and guidelines: N/A (not needed for this Change)
> * Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
>
> == Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
>
>
> == How To Test ==
> The python3-django package has to be installed in order to run the test.
>
> django-admin --version
> 4.0
>
>
> == Dependencies ==
> Django (the fedora package name is python-django) has a few dependent
> packages which should get updated (or removed) as noted above. If they
> were not updated for Django 4.0, that probably means that their
> upstream is not very active anymore.
>

Which ones? I think you need to figure out what those dependent
packages are and list them in this change.

>
> == Contingency Plan ==
> * Contingency mechanism: (What to do?  Who will do it?) N/A (not a
> System Wide Change)
> * Contingency deadline: N/A (not a System Wide Change)
> * Blocks release? N/A (not a System Wide Change)
>
> == Documentation ==
>
> Extensive upstream documentation can be found at
> https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/4.0/
>
> --
> Ben Cotton
> He / Him / His
> Fedora Program Manager
> Red Hat
> TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis

-- 
Elliott
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Updating c4core to 0.1.8 with SONAME bump

[Ben Beasley]

On 2022-01-12, or slightly later, I plan to update c4core to version 
0.1.8 [1] in Rawhide, which will bump the SONAME version. There are 
currently no dependent packages; c4core will be a dependency for 
rapidyaml, which is not yet packaged.


[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/c4core/pull-request/2
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220104.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220103.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220104.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  1
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   88
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  25.23 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   2.14 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   93.63 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: SoaS raw-xz armhfp
Path: Spins/armhfp/images/Fedora-SoaS-Rawhide-20220104.n.0.armhfp.raw.xz
Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz aarch64
Path: 
Labs/aarch64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Rawhide-20220104.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: php-league-container4-4.2.0-1.fc36
Summary: A fast and intuitive dependency injection container version 4
RPMs:php-league-container4
Size:25.23 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  Lmod-8.6.4-1.fc36
Old package:  Lmod-8.6.2-1.fc36
Summary:  Environmental Modules System in Lua
RPMs: Lmod
Size: 1.11 MiB
Size change:  775 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Jan 04 2022 Orion Poplawski  - 8.6.4-1
  - Update to 8.6.4


Package:  OpenEXR_Viewers-2.3.0-8.fc36
Old package:  OpenEXR_Viewers-2.3.0-7.fc35
Summary:  Viewers programs for OpenEXR
RPMs: OpenEXR_Viewers OpenEXR_Viewers-docs
Size: 762.87 KiB
Size change:  1.89 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Nicolas Chauvet  - 2.3.0-8
  - Fix FTBFS


Package:  R-flexiblas-3.0.0-5.fc36
Old package:  R-flexiblas-3.0.0-4.fc35
Summary:  FlexiBLAS API Interface for R
RPMs: R-flexiblas
Size: 188.23 KiB
Size change:  2.10 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 I??aki ??car  - 3.0.0-5
  - Fix test


Package:  WALinuxAgent-2.5.0.2-1.fc36
Old package:  WALinuxAgent-2.3.1.1-2.fc35
Summary:  The Microsoft Azure Linux Agent
RPMs: WALinuxAgent WALinuxAgent-udev
Size: 465.46 KiB
Size change:  16.23 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun Jan 02 2022 Vitaly Kuznetsov  - 2.5.0.2-1
  - Update to 2.5.0.2 (#2008699)


Package:  We10X-icon-theme-0-18.20211227gitbd21e213.fc36
Old package:  We10X-icon-theme-0-17.20211016gite23d4d82.fc36
Summary:  Colorful icon theme inspired by Microsoft Windows 10 aesthetic
RPMs: We10X-icon-theme
Size: 4.29 MiB
Size change:  117.21 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  - 
0-18.20211227gitebd21e21
  - Update to latest git snapshot (2021-12-27)


Package:  antimicrox-3.2.1-1.fc36
Old package:  antimicrox-3.2.0-1.fc36
Summary:  Graphical program used to map keyboard buttons and mouse controls 
to a gamepad
RPMs: antimicrox
Size: 4.64 MiB
Size change:  51.93 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Gergely Gombos  - 3.2.1-1
  - 3.2.1


Package:  arc-theme-20220102-1.fc36
Old package:  arc-theme-20211018-1.fc36
Summary:  Flat theme with transparent elements
RPMs: arc-theme arc-theme-plank
Size: 761.30 KiB
Size change:  90.75 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Mukundan Ragavan  - 20220102-1
  - Update to 20220108


Package:  asymptote-2.74-1.fc36
Old package:  asymptote-2.70-4.fc35
Summary:  Descriptive vector graphics language
RPMs: asymptote
Size: 21.69 MiB
Size change:  -1.50 MiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Nov 09 2021 Jerry James  - 2.70-5
  - Drop XEmacs support in F36 and later
  - Rationalize ownership of (X)Emacs directories

  * Wed Dec 29 2021 Tom Callaway  - 2.73-1
  - update to 2.73

  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Tom Callaway  - 2.74-1
  - update to 2.74


Package:  calibre-5.34.0-1.fc36
Old package:  calibre-5.33.2-1.fc36
Summary:  E-book converter and library manager
RPMs: calibre
Size: 69.46 MiB
Size change:  -58.31 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Kevin Fenzi  5.34.0-1
  - Update to 5.34.0. Fixes rhbz#2033747


Package:  candy-icon-theme-0-25.20211226gitb1a79d8e.fc36
Old package:  candy-icon-theme-0-24.20211003gitdfd05c13.fc36
Summary:  Sweet gradient icon theme
RPMs: candy-icon-theme
Size: 827.93 KiB
Size change:  25.37 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Artur Frenszek-Iwicki  - 
0-25.20211226gitb1a79d8e
  - Update to latest upstream snapshot


Package:  codespell-2.1.0-3.fc36
Old package:  codespell-2.1.0-2.fc35
Summary:  Fix common misspellings in text files
RPMs: codespell
Size: 167.35 KiB
Size change:  -208 B
Changelog:
  * Mon Jan 03 2022 Bastien Nocera  - 2.1.0-3
  + codespell-2.1.0-3
  - Fix CC-BY-SA shortname (#2036037)


Package:  composer-2.2.3-1.fc36
Old package:  composer-2.2.1-1.fc36
Summary:  Dependency Manager for PHP
RPMs: composer
Size: 455.27 KiB
Size change:  688 B
Changelog:
  * Sat Jan 01 2022 Remi Collet  - 2.2.3-1
  - update to 2.2.3


Package:  cpufetch-1.01-1.fc36
Old package:  cpufetch-1.00-1.fc36
Summary:  Simple tool for determining CPU architecture
RPMs: 

Re: How do we announce new packages?

[Ben Cotton]

On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 2:29 PM Fabio Valentini  wrote:
>
> - create a ticketing system for idea / text submissions (project with
> issue tracker on pagure?)
> - there, Fedora contributors can propose their cool new features /
> packages for inclusion in the next article
> - person / small group of people curate submissions, put together a
> final article, and propose it for Fedora Magazine
>
> I admit that this *does* sound better than "yet-another-mailing-list",
> though it's probably more work :)

The work (assuming we're just interested in new packages) could be
shortcut a bit by looking at the SCM requests repo:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issues

This only gives you the new packages, not any useful text, which the
maintainer might be better positioned to provide. Although you could
just use the Description: from the spec file. But one person could
probably put this together for the month in a relatively short time.

Of course, if we want to include stuff beyond "here's the new
packages", this breaks down. The ticket system approach is probably
the best in that case, but the hard part is going to get people to
remember to add to it.

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2028263] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000144 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2022-073471d16f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-073471d16f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2037549] New: Please branch and build perl-PPI-HTML for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037549

Bug ID: 2037549
   Summary: Please branch and build perl-PPI-HTML for EPEL-9
   Product: Fedora EPEL
   Version: epel9
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-PPI-HTML
  Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
  Reporter: p...@city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, spo...@gmail.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Could you please branch and build perl-PPI-HTML for EPEL-9 ?

If you prefer, you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer and I'll do it
myself.

Buildroot overrides are in place for:

* perl-CSS-Tiny-1.20-17.el9
* perl-PPI-1.270-1.el9
* perl-Task-Weaken-1.06-1.el9


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037549
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2032425] perl-Moose for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6862c1aa73 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6862c1aa73


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032425
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #14: 0.000144 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
0.000144 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/14
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Self Introduction: Luna Jernberg

[Luna Jernberg]

Hey!

i just recognized and remembered i never sent an introduction to the devel
list for Fedora

I am Luna Jernberg 31 year old non binary person

Already helped out with Fedora since Nest 2020

and done some Swedish translations for anaconda, Fedora Websites and dnf
also has done some Kernel and QA testings for upcoming kernel .rpms and
Fedora Releases since 32-33
and used Fedora since version 24 or 26 as an user on a Gitlab server and
some other things

i guess some of you have seen me around if not Hello

//Luna bittin Jernberg
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #14: 0.000144 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that 
you are following:
``
0.000144 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/14
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Vanessa Christopher

[Chihurumnaya Ibiam]

Welcome to the community Vanessa.

On Wed, 5 Jan 2022, 8:16 pm Vanessa Christopher, 
wrote:

> Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora
> "Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really
> been exciting learning new stuffs and joining the Fedora community.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #13: 0.000144 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
0.000144 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/13
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Steve Grubb]

On Wednesday, January 5, 2022 3:17:43 PM EST Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:37:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 20:19 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto
> > > > >  > > > > 
> > > > > a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be removed or migrate to
> > > > > systemd scripts ?
> > > > > 
> > > > > rpm -qf /etc/init.d/network --qf "packge =
> > > > > %{sourcerpm}\nsub-package =
> > > > > %{name}\n"
> > > > > 
> > > > > packge = initscripts-10.09-1.fc34.src.rpm
> > > > > sub-package = network-scripts
> > > > 
> > > > It's deprecated and expected to be retired eventually. I doubt a
> > > > "port" would ever happen.
> > > 
> > > initscripts is needed by audit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2029105
> 
> This is really sad. Somebody who understands audit should just propose a
> solution. We shouldn't have an archaic technology kept in Fedora for 10
> years because of one package.

I think audit can be moved to initscripts-service in Fedora. Would that help?

-Steve

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: F36 Change proposal: No ifcfg by default (Self-Contained Change)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 11:37:48AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-01-05 at 20:19 +0100, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
> > Neal Gompa wrote:
> > 
> > > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 9:43 AM Sérgio Basto  > > > wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > 
> > > >  a big BTW when /etc/init.d/network will be removed or migrate to
> > > >  systemd scripts ?
> > > > 
> > > >  rpm -qf /etc/init.d/network --qf "packge = %{sourcerpm}\nsub-package =
> > > >  %{name}\n"
> > > > 
> > > >  packge = initscripts-10.09-1.fc34.src.rpm
> > > >  sub-package = network-scripts
> > 
> > > It's deprecated and expected to be retired eventually. I doubt a
> > > "port" would ever happen.
> > 
> > initscripts is needed by audit: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/2029105

This is really sad. Somebody who understands audit should just propose a 
solution.
We shouldn't have an archaic technology kept in Fedora for 10 years
because of one package.

> network-scripts was split out as a subpackage specifically so it can be
> excluded from images/installs or deprecated without doing the same to
> the whole of initscripts, IIRC.

I'd say we want to get rid of both ;)

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Subject: Self Introduction: Vanessa Christopher

[Matthew Miller]

On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 07:15:49PM -, Vanessa Christopher wrote:
> Hi, I'm Vanessa Christopher from Cameroon, an Outreachy intern with Fedora
> "Extend and improve NeuroFedora's user consumable artefacts". It's really
> been exciting learning new stuffs and joining the Fedora community.

Awesome -- welcome! Let me know if you need anything!


-- 
Matthew Miller

Fedora Project Leader
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2035273] CVE-2020-16156 perl-CPAN: Bypass of verification of signatures in CHECKSUMS files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035273



--- Comment #5 from Tomas Hoger  ---
There is another fix needed to properly fix the first attack vector in addition
to the commit already linked in comment 2 above:

https://github.com/andk/cpanpm/commit/46fe910becd5746adca92e18660567c9e8d37eb5
https://github.com/andk/cpanpm/commit/7f9e5e8c52f535c1c13e177595a5ef4710c72058
https://github.com/andk/cpanpm/commit/c03257dbebccd4deeff1987d5efd98113643f717

These commits are also included in 2.29.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2035273
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2034012] Please branch and build perl-FileHandle-Fmode for EPEL-9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034012

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-64c3a40474 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-64c3a40474


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034012
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[rpms/perl-Test2-Suite] PR #13: 0.000144 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Test2-Suite` that 
you are following:
``
0.000144 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Test2-Suite/pull-request/13
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2028263] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000144 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263

Michal Josef Spacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



--- Comment #2 from Michal Josef Spacek  ---
Changes:
0.000144  2021-12-03 13:17:19-08:00 America/Los_Angeles

- Add void context warning for dies and lives

0.000143  2021-12-01 11:20:03-08:00 America/Los_Angeles

- Add stringification option for custom compare checks

For f34, f35 and rawhide


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028263
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

[Bug 2034173] EPEL9 branch of perl-Perl-MinimumVersion

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034173

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2037517





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037517
[Bug 2037517] Please branch and build perl-PPIx-Regexp for EPEL-9
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034173
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure