Re: PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36
Mark Bidewell kirjoitti 16.4.2022 klo 16.23: I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about Fedora 36. I upgraded from Fedora 35 to the Fedora 36 Alpha (at the time). Just to clarify, there are no Alpha releases in Fedora anymore. A new release starts out as Branched, then becomes Beta and then Final. I could not find a page that explains the whole system, but at least some pieces can be found at [1]. Occasionally when coming out of sleep I get a password prompt from, I believe, PackageKit. Before I filed a bug I was curious if this was a known issue. I have seen this once, too. It first prompted for the password in Finnish (the system language), then again in English. [1]: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/releases/lifecycle/ ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: verifying signature for a package
Please see
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xfontsel/blob/a38f5a42fa7bc59378527cf05dabe29523675613/f/xfontsel.spec#_10
for an example from the same group of X11 programs. Note also that oclock was
previously retired, so see
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming.
On Sat, Apr 16, 2022, at 12:58 PM, Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to pakage oclock for Fedora. According to the packaging
> guidelines I need to have a gpg key.
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
>
> So, the package itself comes with a oclock-1.0.4.tar.gz.sig (from
> upstream). How do I use this?
>
> I tried the following in my spec file:
>
>
> Source0: https://www.x.org/pub/individual/app/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
> Source1: %{source0}.sig
>
>
>
> %prep
> %{gpgverify} --signature='%{SOURCE1}'
> %autosetup
>
>
> Of course, this did not work.
>
> $ rpmbuild -ba oclock.spec
> setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=163728
> Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWxhBy
> + umask 022
> + cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD
> + /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/gpgverify
> '--signature=/home/maitra/rpmbuild/SOURCES/%{source0}.sig'
> gpgverify: No keyring was provided.
> error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWxhBy (%prep)
>
>
> RPM build errors:
> Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWxhBy (%prep)
>
>
>
> My apologies, this is the first time I have had any use for a .sig
> file, and have very little idea of what to do with it.
>
> Thanks for any help!
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
ghex license change from GPLv2+ to GPLv2+ and GFDL and CC-BY-SA
While updating ghex to the latest version, I checked through the included licenses, and found that the user documentation is under GFDL and the icon is under CC-BY-SA, with the sources being under GPLv2+. -- https://amigadave.com/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Batch updates PETSc-3.17 hypre-2.24.0 superlu_dist-7.2.0
I will push these updates next weekend. On 4/6/22 18:58, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Hi all. This is the upgrade of some libraries in Rawhide: petsc-3.17: $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libpetsc*.so*' --source | sort -u bout++-4.4.0-2.fc35.src.rpm dolfin-2019.1.0.post0-21.fc35.src.rpm getdp-3.3.0-12.fc35.src.rpm PETSc-3.17 needs superlu_dist-6.3.0 at least, so i prepared a new recent release of superlu_dist-7.2.0 that uses CMake as configuration tool (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/superlu_dist/pull-request/1): $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libsuperlu_dist*.so*' --source | sort -u amg4psblas-1.0.0-4.fc35.src.rpm hypre-2.18.2-4.fc35.src.rpm petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm Current Hypre release does not compile against superlu_dist-7.2, so i built Hypre-2.24.0, the last one. $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires 'libHYPRE*.so*' --source | sort -u petsc-3.15.3-2.fc35.src.rpm sundials-5.7.0-3.fc35.src.rpm The circle of the dependencies should be closed: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/sagitter/ForTesting/builds/ If all maintainers agree, i can create a side-tag for these new builds. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org GPG key: 0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE GPG key server: https://keyserver1.pgp.com/ OpenPGP_0xCC1CFEF30920C8AE.asc Description: OpenPGP public key OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
verifying signature for a package
Hi,
I am trying to pakage oclock for Fedora. According to the packaging guidelines
I need to have a gpg key.
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification
So, the package itself comes with a oclock-1.0.4.tar.gz.sig (from upstream).
How do I use this?
I tried the following in my spec file:
Source0: https://www.x.org/pub/individual/app/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz
Source1: %{source0}.sig
%prep
%{gpgverify} --signature='%{SOURCE1}'
%autosetup
Of course, this did not work.
$ rpmbuild -ba oclock.spec
setting SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH=163728
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWxhBy
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/maitra/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/gpgverify
'--signature=/home/maitra/rpmbuild/SOURCES/%{source0}.sig'
gpgverify: No keyring was provided.
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWxhBy (%prep)
RPM build errors:
Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.WWxhBy (%prep)
My apologies, this is the first time I have had any use for a .sig file, and
have very little idea of what to do with it.
Thanks for any help!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36
On Sat, 16 Apr 2022 09:23:45 -0400 Mark Bidewell wrote: > I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about Fedora 36. Well, it's a gray area. It is still in beta, final decision is next week. So, you are more likely to get action on the test list. This doesn't seem egregious enough to be a release blocker, but they probably want to know about it. > I upgraded from Fedora 35 to the Fedora 36 Alpha (at the time). > Occasionally when coming out of sleep I get a password prompt from, I > believe, PackageKit. Before I filed a bug I was curious if this was > a known issue. I checked bugzilla, (search for packagekit, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=packagekit), and there don't appear to be any bugs related to this. So, before you post to the test list, t...@lists.fedoraproject.org, you should open a bugzilla and post the link in your email to test. It's OK to just send the email, but the bugzilla makes sure that the issue doesn't get lost in the churn. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-36-20220416.n.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 7/229 (x86_64), 9/161 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-36-20220415.n.0): ID: 1228215 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228215 ID: 1228249 Test: x86_64 universal install_blivet_with_swap URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228249 ID: 1228401 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228401 Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-36-20220415.n.0): ID: 1228050 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228050 ID: 1228085 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228085 ID: 1228217 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228217 ID: 1228220 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228220 ID: 1228235 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228235 ID: 1228239 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228239 ID: 1228241 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_printing_builtin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228241 ID: 1228305 Test: x86_64 universal install_asian_language URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228305 ID: 1228364 Test: aarch64 universal install_asian_language@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228364 ID: 1228390 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso server_cockpit_basic@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228390 ID: 1228402 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz gnome_text_editor@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228402 ID: 1228404 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_printing_builtin@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228404 ID: 1228411 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz evince@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228411 Soft failed openQA tests: 11/229 (x86_64), 5/161 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) New soft failures (same test not soft failed in Fedora-36-20220415.n.0): ID: 1228292 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_kde_64bit URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228292 Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-36-20220415.n.0): ID: 1228053 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso apps_startstop URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228053 ID: 1228057 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228057 ID: 1228068 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228068 ID: 1228078 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228078 ID: 1228095 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso eog URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228095 ID: 1228100 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228100 ID: 1228102 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228102 ID: 1228103 Test: x86_64 Silverblue-dvd_ostree-iso gnome_text_editor URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228103 ID: 1228109 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228109 ID: 1228203 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228203 ID: 1228211 Test: x86_64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228211 ID: 1228233 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228233 ID: 1228246 Test: aarch64 Workstation-upgrade eog@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228246 ID: 1228416 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz desktop_browser@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228416 ID: 1228417 Test: aarch64 Workstation-raw_xz-raw.xz eog@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228417 Passed openQA tests: 210/229 (x86_64), 147/161 (aarch64) New passes (same test not passed in Fedora-36-20220415.n.0): ID: 1228049 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_printing URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228049 ID: 1228055 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso evince URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228055 ID: 1228088 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_login URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228088 ID: 1228157 Test: aarch64 Server-dvd-iso install_resize_lvm@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228157 ID: 1228257 Test: x86_64 universal upgrade_minimal_uefi@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1228257
PackageKit Password Prompt on Fedora 36
I hope this is the right mailing list since this is about Fedora 36. I upgraded from Fedora 35 to the Fedora 36 Alpha (at the time). Occasionally when coming out of sleep I get a password prompt from, I believe, PackageKit. Before I filed a bug I was curious if this was a known issue. Thanks! -- Mark Bidewell http://www.linkedin.com/in/markbidewell ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora 36 compose report: 20220416.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-36-20220415.n.0 NEW: Fedora-36-20220416.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 0 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 0 B Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 0 B Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = = DROPPED IMAGES = = ADDED PACKAGES = = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fedora-Cloud-34-20220416.0 compose check report
No missing expected images. Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64) (Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug) Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20220415.0): ID: 1227970 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1227970 ID: 1227979 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1227979 Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64), 7/8 (aarch64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
