[rpms/perl-perlfaq] PR #1: 5.20230701 bump; Package tests
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-perlfaq` that you are following: `` 5.20230701 bump; Package tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-perlfaq/pull-request/1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219205] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230520 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-aaf41d7282 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-aaf41d7282` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-aaf41d7282 See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219205%23c4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221452] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-5c54c1182f has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-5c54c1182f` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5c54c1182f See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221452%23c5 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2220995] perl-HTTP-Date-6.06 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220995 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-HTTP-Date-6.06-1.fc38 Last Closed||2023-07-11 01:27:42 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-c126e5945d has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220995 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202220995%23c8 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219862] perl-IO-Interactive-1.025 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219862 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version|perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1 |perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1 |.fc39 |.fc39 ||perl-IO-Interactive-1.025-1 ||.fc38 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2023-07-11 01:27:39 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-57fb28f777 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 stable repository. If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219862 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219862%23c12 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219205] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230520 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-506d9f509d has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-506d9f509d` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-506d9f509d See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219205%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221452] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-db8758b8dd has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2023-db8758b8dd` You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-db8758b8dd See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221452%23c4 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
FYI OCaml 5.0 rebuild is under way
Jerry James & I are doing a rebuild of all OCaml packages. There are 8-10 new packages (8 already reviewed, 2 more not reviewed): - ocaml-uucd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217074 - ocaml-uunf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217075 - ocaml-uucp https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217076 - ocaml-uuseg https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217077 - ocaml-ppx-globalize https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217080 - ocaml-ppx-stable-witness https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217183 - ocaml-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217729 - ocaml-ppx-deriving-yaml https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2217730 - not-ocamlfind https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221319 - ocaml-camlp5-buildscripts https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221320 Several packages will be orphaned with the expectation that they will be retired automatically: - ocaml-ancient - ocaml-charinfo-width - ocaml-cil - ocaml-lwt-log - ocaml-migrate-parsetree - ocaml-mmap - ocaml-seq - ocaml-tplib i686 will be dropped from all packages, and some other architectures will temporarily be bytecode only (discussed on list: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/SPML7CUBSZNI36NLXGVHEG7DNHU3EWOJ/) Most of this will be automated by this script: http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-ocaml-rebuild.git;a=summary The side tag is f39-build-side-69760 (please don't build anything in here, it will be handled by us). Hope to get this all done well before the mass rebuild starts. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system
On 7/10/23 05:00, Olivier Fourdan wrote: Hi Vit On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 10:38 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: Hi, I have recently installed Fedora Rawhide via netinstall and there are some questionable packages installed by default, such as: cpp libtomcrypt libxcrypt-compat exiv2 and I wonder what is the mechanism, which pulls these in? For example, there is not much what would depend on cpp: ~~~ $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatdepends cpp Instead of whatdepends use --whatrequire. $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatrequires cpp Depends seems to include `recommends` and `suggests` Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. NsCDE-0:2.2-2.fc38.x86_64 buildah-0:1.30.0-1.fc39.x86_64 calendar-0:1.37-7.20211220cvs.fc37.x86_64 gcc-0:13.1.1-4.fc39.x86_64 xrdb-0:1.2.1-5.fc38.x86_64 ~~~ I can't see it in comps: ~~~ $ grep -R cpp comps-f16.xml.in: cppunit comps-f16.xml.in: cpphs comps-f15.xml.in: cppunit comps-f15.xml.in: cpphs comps-f8.xml.in: cppunit comps-f11.xml.in: cppunit comps-f11.xml.in: cpphs comps-f18.xml.in: cppunit comps-f7.xml.in: cppunit comps-f12.xml.in: cppunit comps-f12.xml.in: cpphs comps-f9.xml.in: cppunit comps-f17.xml.in: cppunit comps-f17.xml.in: cpphs comps-f13.xml.in: cppunit comps-f13.xml.in: cpphs comps-f14.xml.in: cppunit comps-f14.xml.in: cpphs comps-f10.xml.in: cppunit grep: .git/objects/pack/pack-8b71ed94572d14e6f4922239550f2e605ead175b.pack: binární soubor odpovídá grep: .git/objects/pack/pack-e5b1b3c9ad6241515210e06736de0317714d0810.pack: binární soubor odpovídá comps-eln.xml.in.in: cppunit-devel comps-eln.xml.in.in: mingw32-cpp comps-eln.xml.in.in: mingw64-cpp comps-eln.xml.in.in: ocaml-cppo comps-eln.xml.in.in: poppler-cpp comps-eln.xml.in.in: poppler-cpp-devel ~~~ I can't see it in kickstarts: ~~~ $ grep -R cpp custom/fedora-livedvd-haskell.ks:cpphs ~~~ So what is the mechanism these are installed? Where I can report this? Can't comment on all the packages you listed, but the C preprocessor (CPP) is indeed required by xrdb (that's an option in xrdb, see "-cpp" in man xrdb) and xrdb itself is required by GDM: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/blob/rawhide/f/gdm.spec#_80 GDM uses xrdb from its data/Init.in and data/Xsession.in: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Xsession.in#L118-129 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Init.in#L31-34 Please note that these commands all use "xrdb -nocpp" so cpp is not actually used there, but the package dependencies still pull it of course. HTH Cheers Olivier ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)
On 7/10/23 02:30, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > On 10/07/2023 02:49, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> QtWebEngine (used by Falkon) was a >> month or more behind upstream Chromium last I checked. > > Qt5QtWebEngine is an extremely vulnerable thing. It still uses Chromium > 87.0[1]. > > Current Chromium version: 105.0. > > [1]: https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine/ChromiumVersions In that case it should be removed from the distribution. Can KDE mail clients be built without QtWebEngine? This would disable HTML email support, but plain text mail might still work. More generally, WebKit is the only major browser engine with upstream support for being embedded, so it is the only embedded browser engine that is supportable security-wise. Unfortunately, it is also the least secure of the major browser engines on Linux last I checked, and in particular is far behind Chromium. -- Sincerely, Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2220639] perl-Dist-Milla-1.0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220639 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2023-07-10 15:05:40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220639 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2220639] perl-Dist-Milla-1.0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220639 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Dist-Milla-1.0.22-1.fc ||39 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- This increases a minimal version of Perl for generated projects. Suitable for Rawhide only. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220639 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202220639%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2220639] perl-Dist-Milla-1.0.22 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220639 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220639 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F39 Change Proposal: Color Bash Prompt (System Wide)
On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 7:38 PM Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 05. 07. 23 v 11:25 Aoife Moloney napsal(a): > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Color_Bash_Prompt > : > > There seems to be a general desire to have a colored prompt like other > > popular distros, which commonly use green > > Shouldn't blue be the default for Fedora? > (In some palettes the visibility of cyan text on white background is really poor and similarly blue text is often hard to make out on black background.) We could try PROMPT_COLOR='46' which would give us a prompt with cyan background. Background prompt color actually achieves better contrast and stands out more I feel: https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/color-bash-prompt-cyan-dark.png https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/color-bash-prompt-cyan-light.png It has the advantage of not looking like colored text output by some commands: e.g. dnf may print packages in green. I personally use a prompt background color for good contrast. And I think that dark as well as light color schemes should be > considered. IOW I appreciate the screenshot attached above, but could > you also attach one with the light scheme? Thx a lot. Okay, I have added a link to a light gnome-terminal screenshot too on the page. https://petersen.fedorapeople.org/color-bash-prompt-light.png Jens ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F39 Change Proposal: Clean Systemd-boot installs (Self-Contained_
Hi, On 6/22/23 12:28, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/cleanup_systemd_install == Detailed Description == As a first pass, the 'inst.sdboot' option already in anaconda should work. As it stands, that replaces grub+shim with the systemd-boot loader, and moves the kernel + initrd to the EFI system partition (ESP). In general, I think it's great to see this happening. Thank you! It doesn't attempt to create unified kernel images, so the existing `dnf update`, `kdumpctl`, and `make install` in a kernel source directory should all work. Nitpick: 'make install' invokes /usr/bin/installkernel which (sometimes?) invokes kernel-install which will create a UKI, if the configuration specifies that. This sentence implies that 'make install' has some issue with UKIs, but that is not true. As clarification, I added a "." on the wiki version of the proposal so that its hopefully clearer that we aren't excluding UKIs from working with the usual tools. Thanks, /usr/bin/installkernel does a lot of stuff, most of it probably wrong. We could 'ln -sf --relative /usr/bin/kernel-install /usr/sbin/installkernel' and then 'make install' would work without grubby. The vast majority of this work has been done, leaving only two action items, removing grubby from core, and merging a shimming package (sdubby) into the fedora repos. As I wrote before in the bug, what is really grubby and sdubby needed for? Most of what grubby does is arcane archaic stuff that we don't need. With grubby/sdubby we have an additional layer that adds complexity and is very inflexible. Why can't we have Anaconda write the Boot Loader Specification files directly or invoke kernel-install? Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2211942] perl-Sys-Virt-9.4.0 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211942 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Fixed In Version||perl-Sys-Virt-9.4.0-1.fc39 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Last Closed||2023-07-10 12:27:33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2211942 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219205] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230520 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-aaf41d7282 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-aaf41d7282 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219205%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219205] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230520 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-506d9f509d has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-506d9f509d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202219205%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219205] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230520 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Module-CoreList-5.2023 ||0520-1.fc39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)
While I understand the goals are not to track individual users, the linked blog post about the Endless OS system really doesn't inspire confidence considering it can track and report rough user location along with machine model and apps used, which _could_ be combined with other telemetry data and build a specific user profile. While I understand the utility of statistics for developers, this proposal need to be more concrete in terms of what will be collected and for the potential of data abuse be more seriously considered. The most important issue here is user consent. If you want to collect even potentially sensitive user data, make sure the user knows the full extent of their options and is given a choice. Now, I also understand the concern of no one turning the telemetry on and not getting useful data, but I strongly disagree with relying on a default switch and a dark pattern (pressing next on a toggle under "privacy" that is turned on). That is *not consent!* The options given must be a clear Yes/No prompt with a full explanation of what data is sent. If you want to nudge users to turn it on to avoid the aforementioned problem, you could make sure the 'Yes' button is in an easy-to-reach spot like where the 'Next' button is, or to color 'Yes' blue and color 'No' red, which still preserves their semantics but maybe nudges users who don't care or would be on the fence. Lastly, for consent to matter the parties involved need to know the extent of their choices. Here Fedora could get inspiration from other projects. Syncthing is a great example: 1) They present to the user the exact JSON that will be sent over their Yes/No prompt. 2) They version the sets of data sent by the client, so if the data collected changes the user is asked again to consent before new data is sent. Also, before we got this proposal, have other methods of collecting whatever data the desktop team wants been considered? Why were they not chosen? Without the above precautions I'm not sure what the Red Hat team is looking to accomplish except create distruct in their community and potentially drive people off. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221452] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-db8758b8dd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-db8758b8dd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221452%23c3 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221452] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2023-5c54c1182f has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-5c54c1182f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221452%23c2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221452] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19-1.fc39 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- An enhancement release suitable for all Fedoras. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202221452%23c1 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2219205] perl-Module-CoreList-5.20230520 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2219205 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221452] perl-PerlIO-eol-0.19 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC|ppi...@redhat.com | Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221452 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system
Dne 10. 07. 23 v 11:07 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a): On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 11:00, Olivier Fourdan wrote: [...] Can't comment on all the packages you listed Thank you for chiming in. , but the C preprocessor (CPP) is indeed required by xrdb (that's an option in xrdb, see "-cpp" in man xrdb) and xrdb itself is required by GDM: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/blob/rawhide/f/gdm.spec#_80 GDM uses xrdb from its data/Init.in and data/Xsession.in: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Xsession.in#L118-129 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Init.in#L31-34 Please note that these commands all use "xrdb -nocpp" so cpp is not actually used there, but the package dependencies still pull it of course. xrdb does not hard-depend on cpp, only recommends it: $ rpm -qR xrdb |grep cpp $ rpm -q --recommends xrdb cpp $ Right, that is why I have not noticed there actually is some (weak) dependency installed on my system removing the CPP package. Nevertheless, I still wonder, should the cpp be installed by default? Can we exclude it somehow? Probably in kickstart. On my previous system I have removed it probably years ago and I am not aware of any issue. (With exception of GDM) does anybody using `xrdb` for anything where the CPP is really needed? Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221456] F39FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221456 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Last Closed||2023-07-10 10:08:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221456 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230710.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230709.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230710.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 2 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 25 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 2.66 MiB Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded packages: 841.77 MiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 2.51 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64 Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20230710.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-ppc64le-Rawhide-20230710.n.0.iso Image: i3 live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-i3-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230710.n.0.iso Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20230710.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: KDE live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230709.n.0.iso Image: Workstation live aarch64 Path: Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20230709.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: kaidan-0.9.1-1.fc39 Summary: A XMPP client based on KDE Framework RPMs:kaidan Size:1.85 MiB Package: python-sgp4-2.21-3.fc39 Summary: Compute position and velocity of earth-orbiting satellites RPMs:python3-sgp4 Size:830.76 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: archlinux-keyring-20230704-1.fc39 Old package: archlinux-keyring-20230629-1.fc39 Summary: GPG keys used by Arch distribution to sign packages RPMs: archlinux-keyring Size: 1.14 MiB Size change: 80 B Changelog: * Sun Jul 09 2023 Frantisek Sumsal - 20230704-1 - Version 20230704 (#2219535) Package: cinnamon-5.8.4-1.fc39 Old package: cinnamon-5.8.3-1.fc39 Summary: Window management and application launching for GNOME RPMs: cinnamon cinnamon-calendar-server cinnamon-devel-doc Size: 9.41 MiB Size change: 1.36 KiB Changelog: * Sun Jul 09 2023 Leigh Scott - 5.8.4-1 - Update to 5.8.4 release Package: containers-common-4:1-92.fc39 Old package: containers-common-4:1-91.fc39 Summary: Common configuration and documentation for containers RPMs: containers-common containers-common-extra Size: 107.95 KiB Size change: 440 B Changelog: * Sun Jul 09 2023 Daniel J Walsh - 4:1-92 - local build Package: cryfs-0.11.3-3.fc39 Old package: cryfs-0.11.3-2.fc39 Summary: Cryptographic filesystem for the cloud RPMs: cryfs Size: 4.78 MiB Size change: 458 B Changelog: * Sat Jul 08 2023 Vitaly Zaitsev - 0.11.3-3 - Rebuilt due to spdlog 1.12 update. - Backported python-versioneer upstream patch to fix issues with Python 3.12. Package: gensio-2.6.7-1.fc39 Old package: gensio-2.6.6-5.fc39 Summary: General Stream I/O RPMs: gensio libgensio libgensio-devel libgensio-ipmisol libgensio-mdns libgensio-sound libgensio-tcl python3-gensio Size: 5.17 MiB Size change: 15.48 KiB Changelog: * Mon Jul 10 2023 Felix Kaechele - 2.6.7-1 - Update to 2.6.7 - remove upstreamed patches - install systemd unit for gtlsshd Package: gtk-sharp3-3.22.2-5.20220808git3.22.2.fc39 Old package: gtk-sharp3-3.22.2-4.20220808git3.22.2.fc38 Summary: GTK+ 3 and GNOME 3 bindings for Mono RPMs: gtk-sharp3 gtk-sharp3-devel gtk-sharp3-doc gtk-sharp3-gapi Size: 5.63 MiB Size change: -2.88 KiB Changelog: * Mon Jul 10 2023 Timotheus Pokorra - 3.22.2-5 - copy the config file to live beside the gtk-sharp.dll Package: haruna-0.11.2-1.fc39 Old package: haruna-0.11.1-1.fc39 Summary: Open source video player built with Qt/QML and libmpv RPMs: haruna Size: 1.49 MiB Size change: 26.62 KiB Changelog: * Sun Jul 09 2023 Yaroslav Sidlovsky - 0.11.2-1 - version 0.11.2 Package: ibus-1.5.28-12.fc39 Old package: ibus-1.5.28-11.fc39 Summary: Intelligent Input Bus for Linux OS RPMs: ibus ibus-desktop-testing ibus-devel ibus-devel-docs ibus-gtk2 ibus-gtk3 ibus-gtk4 ibus-libs ibus-setup ibus-tests ibus-wayland Size: 51.56 MiB Size change: 11.95 KiB Changelog: * Sun Jul 09 2023 Takao Fujiwara - 1.5.28-12 - Fix sync ibus_input_context_process_key_event() #2 Package: jd-1:0.10.0-1.fc39 Old package: jd-1:0.10.0~beta-1.fc39 Summary: A 2ch browser RPMs: jd Size: 6.08 MiB Size change: 40.46 KiB Changelog: * Sun Jul 09 2023 Mamoru TASAKA - 1:0.10.0-1 - 0.10.0 Package: kid3-3.9.4-1.fc39 Old package: kid3-3.9.2-3.fc38 Summary: Efficient KDE ID3 tag editor RPMs: kid3 kid3-common kid3-qt Size: 13.36 MiB Size change: 69.88 KiB Changelog: * Sun Jul 09 2023 Hedayat Vatankhah - 3.9.4-1 - Release 3.9.4 Package: lensfun-0.3.3-5.fc39 Old package: lensfun
Re: Orphaning piper
Taken. On Fri, Jul 7, 2023 at 3:48 AM Peter Hutterer wrote: > > I've orphaned the piper package. This is the GTK GUI to interface with > the libratbag daemon to configure programmable mice. It's up for grabs > now if you want it, first come, first serve and so on. > > My personal take is that this should be flatpak only but who am I to > stand in the way of a motivated packager :) > > Cheers, > Peter > > PS: if you *are* motivated, Piper desparately needs upstream maintainers I'd love to help, but I already neglect too many side projects to make promises. > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system
On Monday, 10 July 2023 at 11:00, Olivier Fourdan wrote: [...] > Can't comment on all the packages you listed, but the C preprocessor > (CPP) is indeed required by xrdb (that's an option in xrdb, see "-cpp" > in man xrdb) and xrdb itself is required by GDM: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/blob/rawhide/f/gdm.spec#_80 > > GDM uses xrdb from its data/Init.in and data/Xsession.in: > > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Xsession.in#L118-129 > https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Init.in#L31-34 > > Please note that these commands all use "xrdb -nocpp" so cpp is not > actually used there, but the package dependencies still pull it of > course. xrdb does not hard-depend on cpp, only recommends it: $ rpm -qR xrdb |grep cpp $ rpm -q --recommends xrdb cpp $ On my system, only gcc hard-requires cpp. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system
Hi Vit On Mon, Jul 10, 2023 at 10:38 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Hi, > > I have recently installed Fedora Rawhide via netinstall and there are > some questionable packages installed by default, such as: > > cpp > libtomcrypt > libxcrypt-compat > exiv2 > > and I wonder what is the mechanism, which pulls these in? For example, > there is not much what would depend on cpp: > > ~~~ > $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatdepends cpp > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > NsCDE-0:2.2-2.fc38.x86_64 > buildah-0:1.30.0-1.fc39.x86_64 > calendar-0:1.37-7.20211220cvs.fc37.x86_64 > gcc-0:13.1.1-4.fc39.x86_64 > xrdb-0:1.2.1-5.fc38.x86_64 > ~~~ > > > I can't see it in comps: > > > ~~~ > $ grep -R cpp > comps-f16.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f16.xml.in: cpphs > comps-f15.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f15.xml.in: cpphs > comps-f8.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f11.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f11.xml.in: cpphs > comps-f18.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f7.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f12.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f12.xml.in: cpphs > comps-f9.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f17.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f17.xml.in: cpphs > comps-f13.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f13.xml.in: cpphs > comps-f14.xml.in: cppunit > comps-f14.xml.in: cpphs > comps-f10.xml.in: cppunit > grep: > .git/objects/pack/pack-8b71ed94572d14e6f4922239550f2e605ead175b.pack: > binární soubor odpovídá > grep: > .git/objects/pack/pack-e5b1b3c9ad6241515210e06736de0317714d0810.pack: > binární soubor odpovídá > comps-eln.xml.in.in: type="default">cppunit-devel > comps-eln.xml.in.in: arch="x86_64">mingw32-cpp > comps-eln.xml.in.in: arch="x86_64">mingw64-cpp > comps-eln.xml.in.in: ocaml-cppo > comps-eln.xml.in.in: type="default">poppler-cpp > comps-eln.xml.in.in: type="default">poppler-cpp-devel > > ~~~ > > > I can't see it in kickstarts: > > > ~~~ > $ grep -R cpp > custom/fedora-livedvd-haskell.ks:cpphs > > ~~~ > > > So what is the mechanism these are installed? Where I can report this? Can't comment on all the packages you listed, but the C preprocessor (CPP) is indeed required by xrdb (that's an option in xrdb, see "-cpp" in man xrdb) and xrdb itself is required by GDM: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gdm/blob/rawhide/f/gdm.spec#_80 GDM uses xrdb from its data/Init.in and data/Xsession.in: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Xsession.in#L118-129 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gdm/-/blob/main/data/Init.in#L31-34 Please note that these commands all use "xrdb -nocpp" so cpp is not actually used there, but the package dependencies still pull it of course. HTH Cheers Olivier ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)
On Friday, 07 July 2023 at 23:15, Michael Catanzaro wrote: [...] > The local collection is a bit of a hole, but I like your suggestion to > put a short time limit on that. Perhaps we can collect for something > like one hour locally, then delete if the user has not consented to > upload before then. Something like that. This is still collecting without consent. Can I look inside your bedroom and take pictures for something like one hour and then delete them if you haven't consented? This is ridiculous. Please stop even considering doing opt-out collection of any data. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://fedoraproject.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Several questionable packages installed on fresh system
On Mon, 10 Jul 2023 10:38:18 +0200 Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > I have recently installed Fedora Rawhide via netinstall and there are > some questionable packages installed by default, such as: > > cpp > libtomcrypt > libxcrypt-compat > exiv2 > > and I wonder what is the mechanism, which pulls these in? For example, > there is not much what would depend on cpp: > > ~~~ > $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatdepends cpp > Updating and loading repositories: > Repositories loaded. > NsCDE-0:2.2-2.fc38.x86_64 > buildah-0:1.30.0-1.fc39.x86_64 > calendar-0:1.37-7.20211220cvs.fc37.x86_64 > gcc-0:13.1.1-4.fc39.x86_64 > xrdb-0:1.2.1-5.fc38.x86_64 > ~~~ in such case I am trying to uninstall such packages and see what else will dnf report as to-be-removed Dan ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Several questionable packages installed on fresh system
Hi, I have recently installed Fedora Rawhide via netinstall and there are some questionable packages installed by default, such as: cpp libtomcrypt libxcrypt-compat exiv2 and I wonder what is the mechanism, which pulls these in? For example, there is not much what would depend on cpp: ~~~ $ sudo dnf repoquery --whatdepends cpp Updating and loading repositories: Repositories loaded. NsCDE-0:2.2-2.fc38.x86_64 buildah-0:1.30.0-1.fc39.x86_64 calendar-0:1.37-7.20211220cvs.fc37.x86_64 gcc-0:13.1.1-4.fc39.x86_64 xrdb-0:1.2.1-5.fc38.x86_64 ~~~ I can't see it in comps: ~~~ $ grep -R cpp comps-f16.xml.in: cppunit comps-f16.xml.in: cpphs comps-f15.xml.in: cppunit comps-f15.xml.in: cpphs comps-f8.xml.in: cppunit comps-f11.xml.in: cppunit comps-f11.xml.in: cpphs comps-f18.xml.in: cppunit comps-f7.xml.in: cppunit comps-f12.xml.in: cppunit comps-f12.xml.in: cpphs comps-f9.xml.in: cppunit comps-f17.xml.in: cppunit comps-f17.xml.in: cpphs comps-f13.xml.in: cppunit comps-f13.xml.in: cpphs comps-f14.xml.in: cppunit comps-f14.xml.in: cpphs comps-f10.xml.in: cppunit grep: .git/objects/pack/pack-8b71ed94572d14e6f4922239550f2e605ead175b.pack: binární soubor odpovídá grep: .git/objects/pack/pack-e5b1b3c9ad6241515210e06736de0317714d0810.pack: binární soubor odpovídá comps-eln.xml.in.in: type="default">cppunit-devel comps-eln.xml.in.in: arch="x86_64">mingw32-cpp comps-eln.xml.in.in: arch="x86_64">mingw64-cpp comps-eln.xml.in.in: ocaml-cppo comps-eln.xml.in.in: type="default">poppler-cpp comps-eln.xml.in.in: type="default">poppler-cpp-devel ~~~ I can't see it in kickstarts: ~~~ $ grep -R cpp custom/fedora-livedvd-haskell.ks:cpphs ~~~ So what is the mechanism these are installed? Where I can report this? Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2023
Hi Doug, thank you for the info! I've CCed Richard, who maintains pappl - you're right, this will have to be fixed in PAPPL before packaging pappl-retrofit - some with downstream patch, some with spec file changes. Zdenek On 7/4/23 04:12, Douglas Kosovic wrote: Hi Zdenek, Regarding packaging pappl-retrofit and printer applications, looking at the pappl-retrofit based snaps from Till Kamppeter, I suspect the existing Fedora pappl package might need to be modified. For example, extract from ps-printer-app's snapcraft.yaml file which modifies pappl's default build settings: https://github.com/OpenPrinting/ps-printer-app/blob/master/snap/snapcraft.yaml pappl: ... override-build: | set -eux # Raise the supported number of vendor-specific options/attributes in # PAPPL to 256, as the original 32 can be too small for some busy PPD # files perl -p -i -e 's/(define\s+PAPPL_MAX_VENDOR\s+)32/\1 256/' pappl/printer.h # De-activate log-rotating. It does not work with the forked processes # of the filters perl -p -i -e 's/(system->logmaxsize\s+=).*/\1 0;/' pappl/system.c # As we do not use PAPPL's own backends but the CUPS backends using the # "cups" device scheme of pappl-retrofit, we let the manual "Network # Printer" device on the "Add Printer" page of the web interface use a # "cups:socket://..." URI instead of simply "socket://..." perl -p -i -e 's/(httpAssembleURI\(.*?)"socket"(.*?\))/\1"cups:socket"\2/' pappl/system-webif.c # PAPPL's build system does not insert the LDFLAGS when linking. # Patching Makedefs.in to fix this perl -p -i -e 's/^(\s*DSOFLAGS\s*=\s*\S*\s+)/\1\$\(LDFLAGS\) /' Makedefs.in Cheers, Doug -Original Message- From: Zdenek Dohnal Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2023 4:26 AM To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: PWG+OpenPrinting meetup 2023 Hi all, I've joined annual PWG+OpenPrinting virtual meetup where the news and statuses from the current printing development are discussed. The main points are: - cups-filters 2.0 betas and release candidates are released and present in Fedora 38 - since new cups-filters are in Fedora 38, nothing stands in the way of packaging pappl-retrofit and printer applications based on it into Fedora as RPMs - any volunteers are welcome! - CUPS 2.4.x, CUPS 2.5 and CUPS 3.0 are delayed: - 2.4.x - there are several regressions I haven't able to tackle yet, but I hope there is a new version in a month - 2.5 - OAuth support took lot of time to implement - 3.0 - libcups (its version 3.0) has a beta which developers which uses libcups 2.0 can compile and link their applications and see what changed between major release - GTK (its version 4) has merged support for Common Print Dialog Backends - universal print dialog, which can work not only with cups, but with other possible backends (like google cloud print) - WIP on Printer Setup Tool for GNOME Control Center - full support for driverless printers and printers via printer applications The full report is attached. Zdenek -- Zdenek Dohnal Senior Software Engineer Red Hat, BRQ-TPBC ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221456] F39FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221456 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Alien-pkgconf-0.19-4.f ||c39 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221456 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2221456] F39FailsToInstall: perl-Alien-pkgconf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221456 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value CC|ppi...@redhat.com | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2221456 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Perl 5.38 upgrade
Hello, Perl 5.38 was released on July 3 2023 and Perl 5.38 change was approved by FESCo [1]. I have required `f39-perl' build-root for this purpose [2] and it was created. I will start the rebuild later today or tomorrow morning and you can be notified via mail about commits/builds in next days. Please do not build anything into `f39-perl'. Boot-strapping core modules is very peculiar. I also track all changes. You can do your upgrades into rawhide freely in parallel. You can check status on Perl 5.38 change page [3]. Regards, Jitka Plesnikova [1] https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2991 [2] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11474 [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.38#Current_status -- Jitka Plesnikova Senior Software Engineer Red Hat ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: F40 Change: Privacy-preserving Telemetry for Fedora Workstation (System-Wide)
On 10/07/2023 02:49, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: QtWebEngine (used by Falkon) was a month or more behind upstream Chromium last I checked. Qt5QtWebEngine is an extremely vulnerable thing. It still uses Chromium 87.0[1]. Current Chromium version: 105.0. [1]: https://wiki.qt.io/QtWebEngine/ChromiumVersions -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
