orphaning prometheus* and some other golang packages

2023-10-07 Thread Mark E. Fuller 

Hi all,

I picked up a number of prometheus packages (see below) a few months 
back during the golang scramble after an unresponsive maintainer.
I don't have the time or the interest (or the technical chops) to 
maintain them.


Obviously these are important packages, so at this time I am announcing 
my intention to orphan them.
Unless I hear from someone who would like to actively collaborate on 
their maintenance, I'm going to orphan them in approximately one week:


golang-github-prometheus
golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter
golang-github-prometheus-exporter-toolkit
golang-github-prometheus-community-runit

golang-opentelemetry-otel
golang-google-grpc


Best,
fuller
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Upgrades of Sundials and PETSc

2023-10-07 Thread Antonio T. sagitter 

Hi all.

In 1 week, i will upgrade Sundials and PETSc to their related newer 
versions:


PETSc-3.20.0
https://petsc.org/release/changes/320/

sundials-6.6.1
https://github.com/LLNL/sundials/releases

Following packages will be rebuilt:

bout++
freefem++
octave
cantera
dolfin

Regards.
--
---
Antonio Trande
Fedora Project
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
mailto: sagit...@fedoraproject.org
GPG key: 0x40FDA7B70789A9CD
GPG keys server: https://keys.openpgp.org/


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 39 compose report: 20231007.n.0 changes

2023-10-07 Thread Fedora Branched Report 
OLD: Fedora-39-20231006.n.0
NEW: Fedora-39-20231007.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  2
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   5
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  1015.23 KiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   23.59 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -212.12 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Server_KVM qcow2 s390x
Path: Server/s390x/images/Fedora-Server-KVM-39-20231007.n.0.s390x.qcow2
Image: KDE live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-39-20231007.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-39-20231006.n.0.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: RBTools-4.1-1.fc39
Summary: Tools for use with ReviewBoard
RPMs:RBTools
Size:893.82 KiB

Package: python-pydiffx-1.1-5.fc39
Summary: Python implementation of the DiffX specification
RPMs:python3-pydiffx
Size:121.41 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  breeze-icon-theme-5.110.0-2.fc39
Old package:  breeze-icon-theme-5.110.0-1.fc39
Summary:  Breeze icon theme
RPMs: breeze-icon-theme breeze-icon-theme-devel breeze-icon-theme-rcc
Size: 11.50 MiB
Size change:  -112 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Oct 04 2023 Neal Gompa  - 5.110.0-2
  - Fix CMakeLists to use noarch cmake package install path


Package:  dionaea-0.7.0-23.fc39
Old package:  dionaea-0.7.0-17.fc37
Summary:  Low interaction honeypot
RPMs: dionaea dionaea-doc python3-dionaea
Size: 3.36 MiB
Size change:  -83.38 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Jan 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.7.0-18
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_38_Mass_Rebuild

  * Wed Jun 14 2023 Python Maint  - 0.7.0-19
  - Rebuilt for Python 3.12

  * Wed Jul 19 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.7.0-20
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild

  * Sun Jul 23 2023 Python Maint  - 0.7.0-21
  - Rebuilt for Python 3.12

  * Thu Oct 05 2023 Michal Ambroz  0.7.0-22
  - add version metadata to the python module to fix FTBFS


Package:  libX11-1.8.7-1.fc39
Old package:  libX11-1.8.6-2.fc39
Summary:  Core X11 protocol client library
RPMs: libX11 libX11-common libX11-devel libX11-xcb
Size: 8.58 MiB
Size change:  -131.11 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Sep 07 2023 Jos?? Exp??sito  - 1.8.6-3
  - SPDX Migration

  * Wed Oct 04 2023 Peter Hutterer  - 1.8.7-1
  - libX11 1.8.7
- CVE-2023-43785 libX11: out-of-bounds memory access in _XkbReadKeySyms()
- CVE-2023-43786 libX11: stack exhaustion from infinite recursion in
  PutSubImage()
- CVE-2023-43787 libX11: integer overflow in XCreateImage() leading to
 a heap overflow
- CVE-2023-43788 libXpm: out of bounds read in XpmCreateXpmImageFromBuffer()
- CVE-2023-43789 libXpm: out of bounds read on XPM with corrupted colormap


Package:  python-logutils-0.3.5-24.fc39
Old package:  python-logutils-0.3.5-21.fc38
Summary:  Logging utilities
RPMs: python3-logutils
Size: 62.36 KiB
Size change:  -236 B
Changelog:
  * Tue Jun 13 2023 Python Maint  - 0.3.5-22
  - Rebuilt for Python 3.12

  * Fri Jul 21 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.3.5-23
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild

  * Mon Oct 02 2023 Justin Caratzas  - 0.3.5-24
  - Use setuptools instead of distutils, fix unit tests


Package:  python-smbpasswd-1.0.2-15.fc39
Old package:  python-smbpasswd-1.0.2-11.fc38
Summary:  Python SMB Password Hash Generator Module
RPMs: python3-smbpasswd
Size: 101.23 KiB
Size change:  2.71 KiB
Changelog:
  * Tue Jun 13 2023 Python Maint  - 1.0.2-12
  - Rebuilt for Python 3.12

  * Fri Jul 21 2023 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.0.2-13
  - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_39_Mass_Rebuild

  * Thu Oct 05 2023 Michal Ambroz  - 1.0.2-14
  - fix dependencies

  * Thu Oct 05 2023 Michal Ambroz  - 1.0.2-15
  - python 3.10 fix for PY_SSIZE_T_CLEAN s# formatting



= DOWNGRADED PACKAGES =___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: orphaning prometheus* and some other golang packages

2023-10-07 Thread Mikel Olasagasti 
Hi Mark,

Hau idatzi du Mark E. Fuller (ful...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak
(2023 urr. 7(a), lr. (12:22)):
>
> Hi all,
>
> I picked up a number of prometheus packages (see below) a few months
> back during the golang scramble after an unresponsive maintainer.
> I don't have the time or the interest (or the technical chops) to
> maintain them.
>
> Obviously these are important packages, so at this time I am announcing
> my intention to orphan them.
> Unless I hear from someone who would like to actively collaborate on
> their maintenance, I'm going to orphan them in approximately one week:

Thanks for alerting us in advance.

> golang-github-prometheus
> golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter
> golang-github-prometheus-exporter-toolkit
> golang-github-prometheus-community-runit
>
> golang-opentelemetry-otel
> golang-google-grpc

If you can add me as co-admin, I can have a look to all of them.

Kind regards,
Mikel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: orphaning prometheus* and some other golang packages

2023-10-07 Thread fuller 

done - thanks for stepping up Mikel

On 07/10/2023 15:16, Mikel Olasagasti  wrote:

Hi Mark,

Hau idatzi du Mark E. Fuller (ful...@fedoraproject.org) erabiltzaileak
(2023 urr. 7(a), lr. (12:22)):
>
> Hi all,
>
> I picked up a number of prometheus packages (see below) a few months
> back during the golang scramble after an unresponsive maintainer.
> I don't have the time or the interest (or the technical chops) to
> maintain them.
>
> Obviously these are important packages, so at this time I am announcing
> my intention to orphan them.
> Unless I hear from someone who would like to actively collaborate on
> their maintenance, I'm going to orphan them in approximately one week:

Thanks for alerting us in advance.

> golang-github-prometheus
> golang-github-prometheus-node-exporter
> golang-github-prometheus-exporter-toolkit
> golang-github-prometheus-community-runit
>
> golang-opentelemetry-otel
> golang-google-grpc

If you can add me as co-admin, I can have a look to all of them.

Kind regards,
Mikel
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Help running centpkg

2023-10-07 Thread stan via devel 
On Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:05:25 -
"Michael Dawson"  wrote:

> I'm trying to build
> https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs using centpkg but
> am running into errors.
> 
> I'm using Fedora 37 and get this error when I run centpkg mockbuild
> --with=bundled in the directory where I've cloned the
> https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs respository and
> switched to the stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.10.0 branch.
> 
> I'm getting this error:
> 
> Total
>3.7 MB/s |  50 MB
>00:13 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded.
> Running transaction test
> Error: Transaction test error:
>   file /usr/sbin/alternatives from install of
> chkconfig-1.19.2-1.el8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> alternatives-1.24-1.fc38.x86_64
  

This sounds like a package conflict error.  Two packages are trying to
manage the same file.  I find no bugzillas for chkconfig or
alternatives. I infer from that that packages within the same fedora
version don't have this conflict.  Thus, I suggest that you use an f38
instance, so that this package conflict doesn't occur.  No guarantees,
though, maybe no one else has hit this error.  If it still doesn't work,
you should open a bugzilla against one of the packages with the
information you have provided in this email.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Help running centpkg

2023-10-07 Thread Stephen Smoogen 
On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 10:50, stan via devel 
wrote:

> On Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:05:25 -
> "Michael Dawson"  wrote:
>
> > I'm trying to build
> > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs using centpkg but
> > am running into errors.
> >
> > I'm using Fedora 37 and get this error when I run centpkg mockbuild
> > --with=bundled in the directory where I've cloned the
> > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs respository and
> > switched to the stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.10.0 branch.
> >
> > I'm getting this error:
> >
> > Total
> >3.7 MB/s |  50 MB
> >00:13 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded.
> > Running transaction test
> > Error: Transaction test error:
> >   file /usr/sbin/alternatives from install of
> > chkconfig-1.19.2-1.el8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> > alternatives-1.24-1.fc38.x86_64
>   
>
>
Good catch. You should not mix and match el and fedora packages or
repositories like that.

Michael if you are using Fedora 37 as you say lower down, you have 3
different releases trying to put packages on the system:
EL8, Fedora 37 and Fedora 38. You can possibly match Fedora 37 and Fedora
38, but EL8 is like bringing in EL29 packages into the mix.. years of
changing file locations and such.

I generally use toolbox these days for this sort of development:
1. Install the Linux you want to use daily. Get it the way you want it for
that day driving work.
2. `dnf install toolbox`
3. some variation of `toolbox create --image
quay.io/toolbx-images/centos-toolbox centos-stream-9`
4. `toolbox enter centos-stream-9`
5. Do the package installs of centpkg
6. Do the builds




> This sounds like a package conflict error.  Two packages are trying to
> manage the same file.  I find no bugzillas for chkconfig or
> alternatives. I infer from that that packages within the same fedora
> version don't have this conflict.  Thus, I suggest that you use an f38
> instance, so that this package conflict doesn't occur.  No guarantees,
> though, maybe no one else has hit this error.  If it still doesn't work,
> you should open a bugzilla against one of the packages with the
> information you have provided in this email.
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>


-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: ELN build order (was: Re: OCaml 5.1 rebuild)

2023-10-07 Thread Stephen Smoogen 
On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 at 15:45, Richard W.M. Jones  wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 06, 2023 at 11:16:17AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > So, as we all know, build ordering is hard (and, despite intuitive
> > belief, not actually deterministic).
> >
> > ELN actually "cheats" somewhat when we do our builds. When we process
> > a batch of builds (triggered by a set of tag events that come in all
> > at the same time, such as when a side-tag is merged), we create a new
> > ELN side-tag, tag all of the new *Rawhide* builds into this side tag,
> > then trigger a rebuild of all of those builds for ELN. The result here
> > is that we use the Fedora build in the buildroot to avoid
> > bootstrapping issues. Now, there are some special-case packages for
> > which we do *NOT* automatically tag in the Fedora builds because they
> > have known incompatibilities. All OCAML packages fall into this
> > category, since we discovered about 9 months ago that we absolutely
> > cannot mix Fedora's OCAML builds with ELN's (I don't recall the exact
> > reason).
>
> It's probably because the build flags are different and
> (unnecessarily) OCaml encodes the build flags into the hashes of one
> of the base modules.  I forget the exact details but there's an email
> on this list about it somewhere.  Anyway the upshot is that if the
> build flags change at all, as they obviously do in Fedora vs RHEL,
> then the hashes change.  We ought to fix this upstream ...
>
> Anyway I was going to say why not order the packages by their original
> build date in Koji?
>

Mass rebuilds and multiple developers can make this much harder than
expected. The history looks linear, but it may be that the bootstrap blew
up and had to be restarted OR it does need to do a double loop. Or
developer A rebuilt something when it wasn't needed while B was doing
something in a side tag at the same time. Or you find that rust or go
needed to have old/new mixes which weren't needed last time because
ordering didn't matter that time but does now (this can be due to flags or
package differences.) Many of these things are things which the regular
package maintainers know to do with their pets, but other people do not.

-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Help running centpkg

2023-10-07 Thread Leon Fauster via devel 

Am 07.10.23 um 17:30 schrieb Stephen Smoogen:



On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 10:50, stan via devel 
mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>> 
wrote:


On Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:05:25 -
"Michael Dawson" mailto:midaw...@redhat.com>>
wrote:

 > I'm trying to build
 > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs
 using centpkg but
 > am running into errors.
 >
 > I'm using Fedora 37 and get this error when I run centpkg mockbuild
 > --with=bundled in the directory where I've cloned the
 > https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs
 respository and
 > switched to the stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.10.0 branch.
 >
 > I'm getting this error:
 >
 > Total
 >                                                    3.7 MB/s |  50 MB
 >    00:13 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded.
 > Running transaction test
 > Error: Transaction test error:
 >   file /usr/sbin/alternatives from install of
 > chkconfig-1.19.2-1.el8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
 > alternatives-1.24-1.fc38.x86_64
                       


Good catch. You should not mix and match el and fedora packages or 
repositories like that.


Michael if you are using Fedora 37 as you say lower down, you have 3 
different releases trying to put packages on the system:
EL8, Fedora 37 and Fedora 38. You can possibly match Fedora 37 and 
Fedora 38, but EL8 is like bringing in EL29 packages into the mix.. 
years of changing file locations and such.


I generally use toolbox these days for this sort of development:
1. Install the Linux you want to use daily. Get it the way you want it 
for that day driving work.

2. `dnf install toolbox`
3. some variation of `toolbox create --image 
quay.io/toolbx-images/centos-toolbox 
 centos-stream-9`

4. `toolbox enter centos-stream-9`
5. Do the package installs of centpkg
6. Do the builds



Just out of curiosity because I never used toolbox.
Is the above not also accomplishable with a local container?

podman run -ti --name=dev quay.io/centos/centos:stream bash -li

Or does it have additional features?

--
Leon

















___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Help running centpkg

2023-10-07 Thread Otto Liljalaakso 

Stephen Smoogen kirjoitti 7.10.2023 klo 18.30:


On Sat, 7 Oct 2023 at 10:50, stan via devel 
 wrote:


On Fri, 06 Oct 2023 16:05:25 -
"Michael Dawson"  wrote:

> I'm trying to build
> https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs using
centpkg but
> am running into errors.
>
> I'm using Fedora 37 and get this error when I run centpkg mockbuild
> --with=bundled in the directory where I've cloned the
> https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/rpms/nodejs respository and
> switched to the stream-nodejs-18-rhel-8.10.0 branch.
>
> I'm getting this error:
>
> Total
>                                                    3.7 MB/s |  50 MB
>    00:13 Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded.
> Running transaction test
> Error: Transaction test error:
>   file /usr/sbin/alternatives from install of
> chkconfig-1.19.2-1.el8.x86_64 conflicts with file from package
> alternatives-1.24-1.fc38.x86_64
                      


Good catch. You should not mix and match el and fedora packages or 
repositories like that.


Michael if you are using Fedora 37 as you say lower down, you have 3 
different releases trying to put packages on the system:
EL8, Fedora 37 and Fedora 38. You can possibly match Fedora 37 and 
Fedora 38, but EL8 is like bringing in EL29 packages into the mix.. 
years of changing file locations and such.


Actually, Michael says he is using `centpkg mockbuild` here, so my 
expectation is that Mock bootstraps an appropriate chroot and performs 
the build there. The base system's Fedora version (37 here) should not 
matter, apart from providing a working version of `centpkg` and Mock. 
Because the bootstrapping fails, to me this sounds like a bug in either 
Mock or `centpkg` configuration. Unfortunately, I do not package for 
CentOS Stream, so I do not have a guess what it could be exactly. I 
agree that seeing Fedora 38 mixed in there seems strange.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue