[Bug 2247944] New: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.40 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247944 Bug ID: 2247944 Summary: perl-DateTime-Locale-1.40 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-Locale Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 1.40 Upstream release that is considered latest: 1.40 Current version/release in rawhide: 1.39-2.fc39 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/DateTime-Locale/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6477/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-DateTime-Locale -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247944 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202247944%23c0 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
PSA: Rawhide Server (and other xfs) installs broken
Hey folks! Just a heads up that Rawhide Server installs are broken in today's Rawhide compose (and any custom install using xfs). This is because a new version of xfsprogs went into Rawhide and grub2 cannot detect filesystems made with it: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2247926 I've identified the patches needed in grub2, but I can't patch it myself as I'm not on the list of people who can build packages that need to be Secure Boot signed, and anyway, working on the grub2 package is a bit of a nightmare for non-maintainers due to the whole "hundreds of patches that are pulled from an alternative upstream git repo" thing. I've requested xfsprogs be untagged for now: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11763 so if that gets done, things should work again after the next compose. Unfortunately openQA didn't catch this because we don't test xfs installs on updates :( Maybe I'll have to add a test somehow. -- Adam Williamson (he/him/his) Fedora QA Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org https://www.happyassassin.net ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686
I can take care of Abiword. Let me know when to do so.
\--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
\
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
\-d. bowie
Sent from Proton Mail mobile
\ Original Message
On Nov 4, 2023, 12:01 PM, Richard W.M. Jones < rjo...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote: > Hello, > >
> I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to 1.12.46 today. > After
> pushing the changes, it turned out that it no longer builds on > i686
> \[1\]\[2\]. Given that the use on i686 should be minimal, None at all, since
> we don't ship an i686 kernel. (Well, I suppose someone might be mad enough to
> try running gnumeric in an i686 container or chroot on top of an x86-64
> kernel, but why'd you want to do that ...) > I would > be inclined to just
> ExcludeArch: %\{ix86\} and move on. Definitely! > According to > leafdrop,
> gnumeric, abiword and gchemutils are the only downstream > consumers of
> goffice. I can take care of gnumeric and gchemutils, > but I do not have
> access to abiword so I would need help with that. > The alternative would be
> to revert to 0.10.45. What would be your > preference? > > Best regards, >
> Julian > > \[1\] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/goffice/-/issues/70 > \[2\]
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show\_bug.cgi?id=60846 Rich. -- Richard Jones,
> Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my
> programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-p2v
> converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a live CD or over
> the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
> http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
> \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an
> email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List
> Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing\_list\_guidelines List
> Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new\_issue
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686
On Sat, Nov 04, 2023 at 03:38:55PM +0100, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to 1.12.46 today.
> After pushing the changes, it turned out that it no longer builds on
> i686 [1][2]. Given that the use on i686 should be minimal,
None at all, since we don't ship an i686 kernel. (Well, I suppose
someone might be mad enough to try running gnumeric in an i686
container or chroot on top of an x86-64 kernel, but why'd you want to
do that ...)
> I would
> be inclined to just ExcludeArch: %{ix86} and move on.
Definitely!
> According to
> leafdrop, gnumeric, abiword and gchemutils are the only downstream
> consumers of goffice. I can take care of gnumeric and gchemutils,
> but I do not have access to abiword so I would need help with that.
> The alternative would be to revert to 0.10.45. What would be your
> preference?
>
> Best regards,
> Julian
>
> [1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/goffice/-/issues/70
> [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into KVM guests.
http://libguestfs.org/virt-v2v
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
goffice-0.10.46 no longer builds on i686
Hello,
I tried to update goffice to 0.10.46 and gnumeric to 1.12.46 today.
After pushing the changes, it turned out that it no longer builds on
i686 [1][2]. Given that the use on i686 should be minimal, I would be
inclined to just ExcludeArch: %{ix86} and move on. According to
leafdrop, gnumeric, abiword and gchemutils are the only downstream
consumers of goffice. I can take care of gnumeric and gchemutils, but I
do not have access to abiword so I would need help with that.
The alternative would be to revert to 0.10.45. What would be your
preference?
Best regards,
Julian
[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/goffice/-/issues/70
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60846
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
