Packit Workshop Invitation
Packit Workshop 1st Edition 2024 We, the packit team, are happy to invite you to our upcoming workshop about pulling upstream releases to Fedora using Packit. When: Wed, Mar 13, 9:30 AM - Wed, Mar 13, 12:30 PM (GMT+1) Where: Online! How: Join us as soon as you can on www.gather.town (more details will follow). We have prepared a guided tour with some material you can interactively consult by yourself. In the meantime we will be there to answer any question or doubt you may have and to help you onboarding your first package! Who should attend: Anyone who maintains a package in Fedora or EPEL and would like to automate syncing the upstream releases for it. The automation is most suitable for simple packages with straightforward update processes (e.g. without patches, or need to build in side-tags). It works without access to the upstream repository. No package? It’s not an issue. The workshop can help you understand the Fedora release process and the services involved. During the workshop, you can help someone else automate their package or ask someone around if you can help with the maintenance (that’s usually very welcome!). You can also bring an orphaned package back to life! Can’t make it this time? You can also follow our documentation ( https://packit.dev/docs/fedora-releases-guide) and ask for help in case of any issue: #packit:fedora.im (Matrix) / #team-packit (Slack). If you want to join us please fill the following form: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdJGOSubvfsl9d2Vlb1mrb02gE7_kRuxagi1lGLl9WBpEh2Dw/viewform we will send you further details. Looking forward to seeing you! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition
Going purely by upstream support status, yes, GConf2 should be retired; it’s been obsolete for a decade. Going by dependent packages, it’s not so simple. Some of these dependencies are no doubt spurious, optional, or otherwise “removable;” others are real hard dependencies from outdated-but-still-useful application packages. $ repoquery --repo=rawhide -q --whatrequires GConf2 --recursive GConf2-devel-0:3.2.6-41.fc40.i686 GConf2-devel-0:3.2.6-41.fc40.x86_64 GtkAda-devel-0:2.24.2-48.fc40.i686 GtkAda-devel-0:2.24.2-48.fc40.x86_64 GtkAda-gnome-0:2.24.2-48.fc40.i686 GtkAda-gnome-0:2.24.2-48.fc40.x86_64 alexandria-0:0.7.9-7.fc40.noarch apcupsd-gui-0:3.14.14-31.fc40.x86_64 cbrpager-0:0.9.22-31.fc40.x86_64 ccgo-0:0.3.6.5-22.fc40.x86_64 cdcollect-0:0.6.0-42.fc40.x86_64 fantasdic-0:1.0-0.25.beta7.fc40.noarch gconf-editor-0:3.0.1-29.fc40.x86_64 gconfmm26-0:2.28.3-72.fc40.i686 gconfmm26-0:2.28.3-72.fc40.x86_64 gconfmm26-devel-0:2.28.3-72.fc40.i686 gconfmm26-devel-0:2.28.3-72.fc40.x86_64 giver-0:0.1.8-38.fc40.x86_64 gnome-desktop-sharp-devel-0:2.26.0-49.fc40.i686 gnome-desktop-sharp-devel-0:2.26.0-49.fc40.x86_64 gnome-do-0:0.95.3-27.fc40.x86_64 gnome-do-devel-0:0.95.3-27.fc40.i686 gnome-do-devel-0:0.95.3-27.fc40.x86_64 gnome-phone-manager-0:0.69-45.fc40.x86_64 gnome-sharp-0:2.24.2-34.fc40.x86_64 gnome-sharp-devel-0:2.24.2-34.fc40.i686 gnome-sharp-devel-0:2.24.2-34.fc40.x86_64 gnome-translate-0:0.99-43.fc39.x86_64 gnome-vfs2-0:2.24.4-45.fc40.i686 gnome-vfs2-0:2.24.4-45.fc40.x86_64 gnome-vfs2-common-0:2.24.4-45.fc40.noarch gnome-vfs2-devel-0:2.24.4-45.fc40.i686 gnome-vfs2-devel-0:2.24.4-45.fc40.x86_64 gnome-vfs2-monikers-0:2.15.3-37.fc40.x86_64 gnome-vfs2-smb-0:2.24.4-45.fc40.x86_64 gphotoframe-0:2.0.2-24.hg2084299dffb6.fc40.noarch grhino-0:0.16.1-19.fc40.x86_64 gtk-sharp-beans-0:2.14.0-35.fc40.x86_64 gtk-sharp-beans-devel-0:2.14.0-35.fc40.i686 gtk-sharp-beans-devel-0:2.14.0-35.fc40.x86_64 icedtea-web-0:1.8.8-4.fc40.x86_64 icedtea-web-devel-0:1.8.8-4.fc40.noarch icedtea-web-javadoc-0:1.8.8-4.fc40.noarch ignuit-0:2.24.3-16.fc40.x86_64 libbonoboui-0:2.24.5-25.fc39.i686 libbonoboui-0:2.24.5-25.fc39.x86_64 libbonoboui-devel-0:2.24.5-25.fc39.i686 libbonoboui-devel-0:2.24.5-25.fc39.x86_64 libgnome-0:2.32.1-30.fc40.i686 libgnome-0:2.32.1-30.fc40.x86_64 libgnome-devel-0:2.32.1-30.fc40.i686 libgnome-devel-0:2.32.1-30.fc40.x86_64 libgnomeui-0:2.24.5-32.fc40.i686 libgnomeui-0:2.24.5-32.fc40.x86_64 libgnomeui-devel-0:2.24.5-32.fc40.i686 libgnomeui-devel-0:2.24.5-32.fc40.x86_64 librawstudio-0:2.1-0.35.20210527.gitc140a5e.s20231112gitc753388.fc40.i686 librawstudio-0:2.1-0.35.20210527.gitc140a5e.s20231112gitc753388.fc40.x86_64 librawstudio-devel-0:2.1-0.35.20210527.gitc140a5e.s20231112gitc753388.fc40.i686 librawstudio-devel-0:2.1-0.35.20210527.gitc140a5e.s20231112gitc753388.fc40.x86_64 linsmith-0:0.99.33-7.fc40.x86_64 mail-notification-0:5.4-111.git.9ae8768.fc40.x86_64 mono-addins-devel-0:1.3.3-6.fc40.i686 mono-addins-devel-0:1.3.3-6.fc40.x86_64 mono-tools-0:4.2-30.fc40.x86_64 mono-tools-devel-0:4.2-30.fc40.i686 mono-tools-devel-0:4.2-30.fc40.x86_64 mono-tools-gendarme-0:4.2-30.fc40.x86_64 mono-tools-monodoc-0:4.2-30.fc40.x86_64 monodevelop-0:5.10.0-27.fc40.x86_64 monodevelop-debugger-gdb-0:5.0.1-16.fc40.x86_64 monodevelop-devel-0:5.10.0-27.fc40.i686 monodevelop-devel-0:5.10.0-27.fc40.x86_64 mtn-browse-0:1.20-18.fc40.noarch pdfmod-0:0.9.1-32.fc40.x86_64 perl-Gnome2-0:1.048-12.fc40.x86_64 perl-Gnome2-GConf-0:1.047-12.fc40.x86_64 perl-Gnome2-VFS-0:1.084-12.fc40.x86_64 pinta-0:1.7.1-7.fc40.x86_64 rawstudio-0:2.1-0.35.20210527.gitc140a5e.s20231112gitc753388.fc40.x86_64 ruby-bonoboui2-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-bonoboui2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.i686 ruby-bonoboui2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-gconf2-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-gconf2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.i686 ruby-gconf2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-gnome2-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-gnome2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.i686 ruby-gnome2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-gnomevfs-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-gnomevfs-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.i686 ruby-gnomevfs-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-libglade2-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 ruby-libglade2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.i686 ruby-libglade2-devel-0:0.90.4-19.fc40.x86_64 sirius-0:0.8.0-46.fc40.x86_64 teg-0:0.12.0-7.fc40.x86_64 tomboy-0:1.15.9-20.fc40.x86_64 tomboy-devel-0:1.15.9-20.fc40.i686 tomboy-devel-0:1.15.9-20.fc40.x86_64 tomoe-gtk-devel-0:0.6.0-44.fc40.i686 tomoe-gtk-devel-0:0.6.0-44.fc40.x86_64 ucview-0:0.33-27.fc40.i686 ucview-0:0.33-27.fc40.x86_64 ucview-devel-0:0.33-27.fc40.i686 ucview-devel-0:0.33-27.fc40.x86_64 ufraw-0:0.23-0.17.20210425.fc39.x86_64 ufraw-common-0:0.23-0.17.20210425.fc39.x86_64 ufraw-gimp-0:0.23-0.17.20210425.fc39.x86_64 verbiste-gnome-0:0.1.48-3.fc40.x86_64 wallpapoz-0:0.6.2-16.fc40.noarch xoo-0:0.8-23.fc40.x86_64 Looking only at direct dependencies: $ fedrq wrsrc -s GConf2 GtkAda-2.24.2-48.fc40.src alexandria-0.7.9-7.fc40.src apcupsd-3.14.14-31.fc40.src cdrdao-1.2.5-9.fc40.src evolution-rspam-0.6.0
Fedora Linux 40 Bodhi updates-testing activation & Beta freeze
Hi all, Today's an important day on the Fedora Linux f40 schedule [1], with several significant cut-offs. First of all, today is the Bodhi updates-testing activation point [2]. That means that from now all Fedora Linux 40 packages must be submitted to updates-testing and pass the relevant requirements [3] before they will be marked as 'stable' and moved to the Fedora Repository. Today is also the Beta freeze [4]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs [5][6] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds will remain in updates-testing until the Beta release is approved, at which point the Beta freeze is lifted and packages can move to 'stable' as usual until the Final freeze. Today is also the Software String freeze [7], which means that strings marked for translation in Fedora-translated projects should not now be changed for Fedora Linux 40. Finally, today is the 'completion deadline' Change Checkpoint [8], meaning that Fedora Linux f40 Changes must now be 'feature complete or close enough to completion that a majority of its functionality can be tested'. All tracking bugs should be on ON_QA state or later to reflect this. Regards, Fedora Release Engineering [1] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Bodhi_enabling [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Branched_release [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Milestone_freezes [5] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_blocker_bug_process [6] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process [7] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/StringFreezePolicy [8] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy -- ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: dmesg restricted to root in Rawhide
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 2:16 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/commit/ed5ba266c61e01a52359b5793a627e7c9aae8854 > > Why wasn't this a Fedora change proposal? > > Also the justification given for such a major change is very thin. > I'm sure product security can give us some more details of precisely > what exploits will be mitigated, in the change proposal. In practice, this isn't that much of a lockdown for most fedora users. We give the default user on a system wheel access which means both 'sudo dmesg' and 'journalctl -k' work as is. While giving existing CVE numbers that are easier/possible to exploit doesn't much matter because they should be fixed already, It gets rid of a number of exploits where you need information that is only available via oops etc. Justin > Rich. > > -- > Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones > Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com > libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, > bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition
Dne 26. 02. 24 v 15:51 Richard Hughes napsal(a): If the SPDX listing isn't using src.fedoraproject.org and instead using something like bugzilla please yell. Being listed as maintaining all those also makes the packager-dashboard basically useless for me too. 🙂 I am using a script: https://pagure.io/fedora-misc-package-utilities/blob/master/f/find-package-maintainers And as you already found, it is using data from src.fedoraproject.org. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: dmesg restricted to root in Rawhide
Once upon a time, Richard W.M. Jones said: > https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/commit/ed5ba266c61e01a52359b5793a627e7c9aae8854 > > Why wasn't this a Fedora change proposal? > > Also the justification given for such a major change is very thin. > I'm sure product security can give us some more details of precisely > what exploits will be mitigated, in the change proposal. It's not just Rawhide, it was changed in F39 mid-stream with the 6.7 kernel (and no notice/announcement). -- Chris Adams -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
dmesg restricted to root in Rawhide
https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-ark/-/commit/ed5ba266c61e01a52359b5793a627e7c9aae8854 Why wasn't this a Fedora change proposal? Also the justification given for such a major change is very thin. I'm sure product security can give us some more details of precisely what exploits will be mitigated, in the change proposal. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com libguestfs lets you edit virtual machines. Supports shell scripting, bindings from many languages. http://libguestfs.org -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 02:51:34PM +, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 15:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > * 23711 spec files in Fedora > > I was looking through the list for any of my packages, and I've found > that I'm "maintaining" long dead packages like > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/GConf2 Should this package be retired? Zbyszek -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora 40 compose report: 20240227.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-40-20240226.n.0 NEW: Fedora-40-20240227.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:3 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 119 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 91.70 MiB Size of dropped packages:38.34 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 4.72 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 118.64 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: Kinoite ociarchive x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/images/Fedora-Kinoite-40.20240227.n.0.ociarchive Image: Kinoite ociarchive ppc64le Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Kinoite-40.20240227.n.0.ociarchive Image: Kinoite ociarchive aarch64 Path: Kinoite/aarch64/images/Fedora-Kinoite-40.20240227.n.0.ociarchive = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Silverblue ociarchive ppc64le Path: Silverblue/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Silverblue-40.20240226.n.0.ociarchive Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-x86_64-40-20240226.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: asl-20240106-1.20240201git2f5d9de.fc40 Summary: AMPL Solver Library RPMs:asl asl-devel Size:2.95 MiB Package: coin-or-HiGHS-1.6.0-1.fc40 Summary: Linear optimization software RPMs:coin-or-HiGHS coin-or-HiGHS-devel python3-highspy Size:7.30 MiB Package: dmidiplayer-1.7.3-1.fc40 Summary: Drumstick MIDI Player RPMs:dmidiplayer Size:2.00 MiB Package: embree3-3.13.5-8.fc40 Summary: Collection of high-performance ray tracing kernels RPMs:embree3 embree3-devel Size:13.05 MiB Package: kmidimon-1.4.0-1.fc40 Summary: Drumstick MIDI monitor RPMs:kmidimon Size:1.62 MiB Package: python-mailman-web-0.0.6-1.fc40 Summary: Mailman 3 Web interface RPMs:python3-mailman-web Size:39.26 KiB Package: python-snakemake-interface-report-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc40 Summary: The interface for Snakemake report plugins RPMs:python3-snakemake-interface-report-plugins Size:26.41 KiB Package: redsocks-0.5-1.fc40 Summary: SOCKS and HTTP proxy redirector RPMs:redsocks Size:311.96 KiB Package: rust-gif0.12-0.12.0-1.fc40 Summary: GIF de- and encoder RPMs:rust-gif0.12+color_quant-devel rust-gif0.12+default-devel rust-gif0.12+raii_no_panic-devel rust-gif0.12+std-devel rust-gif0.12-devel Size:653.82 KiB Package: scip-8.1.0-1.fc40 Summary: Solving Constraint Integer Programs RPMs:libscip libscip-devel libscip-doc scip Size:48.71 MiB Package: soplex-6.0.4-1.fc40 Summary: Sequential object-oriented simplex RPMs:libsoplex libsoplex-devel libsoplex-doc soplex Size:15.07 MiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: tomcatjss-8.4.1-3.fc40 Summary: JSS Connector for Apache Tomcat RPMs:dogtag-tomcatjss Size:38.34 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: NetworkManager-1:1.45.91-1.fc40 Old package: NetworkManager-1:1.45.9-1.fc40.2 Summary: Network connection manager and user applications RPMs: NetworkManager NetworkManager-adsl NetworkManager-bluetooth NetworkManager-cloud-setup NetworkManager-config-connectivity-fedora NetworkManager-config-server NetworkManager-dispatcher-routing-rules NetworkManager-initscripts-ifcfg-rh NetworkManager-initscripts-updown NetworkManager-libnm NetworkManager-libnm-devel NetworkManager-ovs NetworkManager-ppp NetworkManager-team NetworkManager-tui NetworkManager-wifi NetworkManager-wwan Size: 25.97 MiB Size change: 184.57 KiB Changelog: * Tue Feb 20 2024 Beniamino Galvani - 1:1.45.91-1 - Update to 1.46-rc2 (1.45.91) release - Enable stable MAC address based on SSID for Wi-Fi connections (rh #2258088) - Enable IPv4 ACD (duplicate address detection) by default (rh #2258083) Package: Singular-4.3.2p8-1.fc40 Old package: Singular-4.3.1p1-2.fc38 Summary: Computer Algebra System for polynomial computations RPMs: Singular Singular-devel Singular-doc Singular-emacs Singular-libpolys Singular-libpolys-devel Singular-libs factory factory-devel factory-gftables Size: 90.20 MiB Size change: -6.04 MiB Changelog: * Mon Apr 17 2023 Florian Weimer - 4.3.1p1-3 - Backport upstream patch to fix C99 compatibility issue * Fri Jan 19 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.3.1p1-4 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild * Mon Jan 22 2024 Fedora Release Engineering - 4.3.1p1-5 - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_40_Mass_Rebuild * Thu Feb 01 2024 Jerry James - 4.3.2p8-1 - Version 4.3.2p8 - Drop upstreamed -alias and -c99 patches - Stop building for 32-bit x86 - Build with ccluster and spasm support - Build docs only on x86_64 and ppc64le architectures Package: TOPCOM-1.1.2-1.fc40 Old package: TOPCOM-0.17.10-6.fc40 Summary: Triangulations Of Point Configurations and Oriented Matroids RPMs: TOPCOM TOPCOM-devel TOPCOM-examples TOPCOM-libs Size: 11.35 MiB Size change: 6.51 MiB Changelog: * Fri Feb 23 2024 Jerry
Re: SoPlex and SCIP builds
On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 7:21 PM Jerry James wrote: > The Rawhide side tag is being merged into Rawhide now. The F40 builds > have hit an unfortunate snag and have not progressed far. If anybody > from releng is reading this, I need > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11977 processed before I can make > further progress. I appreciate any help. The F40 builds are done and the side tag has been merged. The affected packages can now be built directly for Rawhide and F40. Thanks again to everyone who helped. -- Jerry James http://www.jamezone.org/ -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Login issues to lists.* and src.*? Any outages?
All that said, I have filed: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11799 for us to investigate why it's not properly disabling the unresponsive nodes and look into the underlying unresponsiveness issue. kevin signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: remnants of modularity in mock configs
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 9:52 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi, > > I was looking into mock configs, and mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39 still lists > for rawhide buildroots, repositories called rawhide-modular, > rawhide-modular-debuginfo, rawhide-modular-source, with enabled=0. > > Those urls lead to content like > http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Modular/x86_64/os/Packages/ > i.e. a bunch of modular packages built for F39 in early 2023. > IIUC, those will not get updated… Can we just drop those repo definitions > from mock so simplify things? > Yes. https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/pull/1340 -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:44, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general > creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages? > > I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit confused why I'm on > so many packages as a separate committer. I've been at Red Hat for a > lng time, so it might be various things being imported from cvs > for example. I also see alexl is in the same boat as me. > > Is there any automated way to drop these? e.g. a git repo with ACLs > that I could send a patch for? > > I think it is all stored in the pagure database and would need to be removed with either direct database commands or something similar. This might be better to ask in a releng ticket so they can give direct answers. > Richard. > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
remnants of modularity in mock configs
Hi, I was looking into mock configs, and mock-core-configs-40.1-1.fc39 still lists for rawhide buildroots, repositories called rawhide-modular, rawhide-modular-debuginfo, rawhide-modular-source, with enabled=0. Those urls lead to content like http://ftp.nluug.nl/pub/os/Linux/distr/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Modular/x86_64/os/Packages/ i.e. a bunch of modular packages built for F39 in early 2023. IIUC, those will not get updated… Can we just drop those repo definitions from mock so simplify things? Zbyszek -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general > creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages? I'm a packager and a provenpackager, so I'm a bit confused why I'm on so many packages as a separate committer. I've been at Red Hat for a lng time, so it might be various things being imported from cvs for example. I also see alexl is in the same boat as me. Is there any automated way to drop these? e.g. a git repo with ACLs that I could send a patch for? Richard. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240227.n.0 changes
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240225.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240227.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 12 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 190 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 63.39 MiB Size of dropped packages:232.97 KiB Size of upgraded packages: 4.17 GiB Size of downgraded packages: 0 B Size change of upgraded packages: 107.58 MiB Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B = ADDED IMAGES = Image: KDE live aarch64 Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-KDE-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20240227.n.0.iso Image: Workstation live-osbuild aarch64 Path: Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-osb-Rawhide-20240227.n.0.aarch64.iso Image: Workstation live-osbuild x86_64 Path: Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-osb-Rawhide-20240227.n.0.x86_64.iso Image: Kinoite ociarchive aarch64 Path: Kinoite/aarch64/images/Fedora-Kinoite-Rawhide.20240227.n.0.ociarchive Image: Cloud_Base tar-gz x86_64 Path: Cloud/x86_64/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-GCP-Rawhide-20240227.n.0.x86_64.tar.gz Image: Kinoite ociarchive ppc64le Path: Kinoite/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Kinoite-Rawhide.20240227.n.0.ociarchive Image: Kinoite ociarchive x86_64 Path: Kinoite/x86_64/images/Fedora-Kinoite-Rawhide.20240227.n.0.ociarchive Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20240227.n.0.iso = DROPPED IMAGES = Image: Onyx dvd-ostree x86_64 Path: Onyx/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Onyx-ostree-x86_64-Rawhide-20240225.n.0.iso = ADDED PACKAGES = Package: dbus-test-runner-19.04.0-1.fc41 Summary: Utility to run executables under a new DBus session for testing RPMs:dbus-test-runner dbus-test-runner-devel Size:348.50 KiB Package: dmidiplayer-1.7.3-1.fc41 Summary: Drumstick MIDI Player RPMs:dmidiplayer Size:2.00 MiB Package: golang-github-blackfireio-osinfo-1.0.5-1.fc41 Summary: Go OS Info library RPMs:golang-github-blackfireio-osinfo-devel Size:15.12 KiB Package: kmidimon-1.4.0-1.fc41 Summary: Drumstick MIDI monitor RPMs:kmidimon Size:1.62 MiB Package: libayatana-appindicator-0.5.93-1.fc41 Summary: Ayatana Application Indicators RPMs:libayatana-appindicator-gtk2 libayatana-appindicator-gtk2-devel libayatana-appindicator-gtk2-sharp libayatana-appindicator-gtk2-sharp-devel libayatana-appindicator-gtk3 libayatana-appindicator-gtk3-devel libayatana-appindicator-gtk3-sharp libayatana-appindicator-gtk3-sharp-devel Size:1.15 MiB Package: libayatana-ido-0.10.1-3.fc41 Summary: Ayatana Indicator Display Objects library RPMs:libayatana-ido-gtk3 libayatana-ido-gtk3-devel Size:534.51 KiB Package: libayatana-indicator-0.9.4-1.fc41 Summary: Ayatana Indicators Shared Library RPMs:libayatana-indicator-gtk2 libayatana-indicator-gtk2-devel libayatana-indicator-gtk3 libayatana-indicator-gtk3-devel libayatana-indicator-tools-gtk3 Size:716.27 KiB Package: python-mailman-web-0.0.6-1.fc41 Summary: Mailman 3 Web interface RPMs:python3-mailman-web Size:39.34 KiB Package: python-pyside6-6.6.2-1.fc41 Summary: Python bindings for the Qt 6 cross-platform application and UI framework RPMs:pyside6-tools python3-pyside6 python3-pyside6-devel python3-shiboken6 python3-shiboken6-devel shiboken6 Size:56.03 MiB Package: python-snakemake-interface-report-plugins-1.0.0-2.fc41 Summary: The interface for Snakemake report plugins RPMs:python3-snakemake-interface-report-plugins Size:26.39 KiB Package: redsocks-0.5-1.fc41 Summary: SOCKS and HTTP proxy redirector RPMs:redsocks Size:312.01 KiB Package: rust-gif0.12-0.12.0-1.fc41 Summary: GIF de- and encoder RPMs:rust-gif0.12+color_quant-devel rust-gif0.12+default-devel rust-gif0.12+raii_no_panic-devel rust-gif0.12+std-devel rust-gif0.12-devel Size:653.81 KiB = DROPPED PACKAGES = Package: rust-gdk4-sys0.6-0.6.3-2.fc40 Summary: FFI bindings of GDK 4 RPMs:rust-gdk4-sys0.6+default-devel rust-gdk4-sys0.6+dox-devel rust-gdk4-sys0.6+v4_10-devel rust-gdk4-sys0.6+v4_2-devel rust-gdk4-sys0.6+v4_4-devel rust-gdk4-sys0.6+v4_6-devel rust-gdk4-sys0.6+v4_8-devel rust-gdk4-sys0.6-devel Size:112.06 KiB Package: rust-graphene-sys0.17-0.17.10-2.fc40 Summary: FFI bindings to libgraphene-1.0 RPMs:rust-graphene-sys0.17+default-devel rust-graphene-sys0.17+dox-devel rust-graphene-sys0.17-devel Size:34.19 KiB Package: rust-smallstr0.2-0.2.0-2.fc40 Summary: String-like container based on smallvec RPMs:rust-smallstr0.2+default-devel rust-smallstr0.2+ffi-devel rust-smallstr0.2+serde-devel rust-smallstr0.2+union-devel rust-smallstr0.2-devel Size:48.38 KiB Package: tomcatjss-8.4.1-3.fc40 Summary: JSS Connector for Apache Tomcat RPMs:dogtag-tomcatjss Size:38.34 KiB = UPGRADED PACKAGES = Package: NetworkManager-1:1.45.91-1.fc41 Old package: NetworkManager-1:1.45.9-1.fc40.2 Summary: Network connection manager and user applications RPMs
