Re: Unresponsive packagers: suanand and vponcova

[Sundeep Anand]

(not sure how to update email at bugzilla.redhat.com)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   4  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c66806f4ad   
stb-0-0.45.20240213gitae721c5.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

zabbix50-5.0.42-1.el7

Details about builds:



 zabbix50-5.0.42-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-cbbbf134d3)
 Open-source monitoring solution for your IT infrastructure

Update Information:

Update to 5.0.42
Hopefully really get the zabbix_run_sudo SELinux boolean working for  zabbix-
agent and allow it to run lvm when enabled
Drop crypto-policies patch on EL7 - not applicable

ChangeLog:

* Fri May  3 2024 Orion Poplawski  - 5.0.42-1
- Update to 5.0.42
- Hopefully really get the zabbix_run_sudo SELinux boolean working for
  zabbix-agent and allow it to run lvm when enabled
- Drop crypto-policies patch on EL7 - not applicable


--
___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278129] perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-527f57dd1b has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2024-527f57dd1b`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-527f57dd1b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278129%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6002b14f95 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2024-6002b14f95`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6002b14f95

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c9
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-3de8ba209f has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2024-3de8ba209f`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3de8ba209f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c8
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Unresponsive packagers: suanand and vponcova

[Jens-Ulrik Petersen]

I cc'ed Sundeep (no longer in Red Hat for some time).

But I have been in contact with him recently and suggested to update his
email.

Jens

On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 4:59 PM Pierre-Yves Chibon 
wrote:

> Good Morning Everyone,
>
> We have been emailing daily the following users to notify that the email
> they
> have set in FAS does not correspond to a valid bugzilla account.
> This is a requirement for Fedora packagers.
>
> Does someone know how to contact them?
>
> suanand - emailed since April 5th
>
> suanand is maintainer of rpms/gettext
> suanand is main admin of rpms/php-gettext-gettext
>   rpms/php-gettext-gettext co-maintainers: @petersen
> suanand has a bugzilla override on rpms/php-gettext-gettext
> suanand is main admin of rpms/php-gettext-languages
>   rpms/php-gettext-languages co-maintainers: @petersen
> suanand has a bugzilla override on rpms/php-gettext-languages
> suanand is maintainer of rpms/python-polib
> suanand is maintainer of rpms/python-tinydb
> suanand is maintainer of rpms/translate-toolkit
> suanand is maintainer of rpms/transtats-cli
> suanand is maintainer of rpms/zanata-python-client
>
>
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8d89e9ee9f has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8d89e9ee9f

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c7
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-3a9183cf5b has been pushed to the Fedora 39 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2024-3a9183cf5b`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3a9183cf5b

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c6
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: OCaml flambda optimizations causing a compilation slow down

[Florian Weimer]

* Richard W. M. Jones:

> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:16:45AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>> 
>> > This email is mostly to notify that this is happening.  I'm not sure
>> > if a single package slowing down compilation means we need to do
>> > anything here, but if anyone else sees similar symptoms, let us know.
>> 
>> What blocks you from profiling it and fixing the performance issue?
>
> I did profile it down to a couple of functions in a very dark corner
> of the compiler (see the thread on cocci devel list that I posted).
> However in the time available last week I didn't have the time to
> understand what it was doing or fix it.

It's computing a transitive closure of a graph, but in a strange way.

The graph it chokes on has 12,732 vertices and 56,289 edges, and 3,449
vertices are Top.  So it's really not very large, and the original graph
is even quite sparse.

This should fix it:

  flambda: Improve transitive closure in invariant_params_in_recursion
  

Compilation is still not exactly fast, but I think it's bearable (less
than 40 seconds over here).

My original comment was a bit of a snark, admittedly.  This one was
slightly more challenging than usual because it takes a while until
invariant_params_in_recursion is reached, so if you hit ^C under GDB to
early, you won't see where it's really spending its time.  But I'm
pretty sure profiling with just 10 samples per second would have
revealed the problematic area just fine.

Thanks,
Florian
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

tunnelvision attack

[Neal Becker]

I'm assuming Fedora systems are vulnerable:

https://arstechnica.com/security/2024/05/novel-attack-against-virtually-all-vpn-apps-neuters-their-entire-purpose/

I hope we can find a fix soon!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Self Introduction: Jan André Reuter

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

Hello, Jan!

On Friday, 03 May 2024 at 11:29, Jan Andre Reuter wrote:
[...]
> I decided to learn a bit about the packaging and open a PR to update
> it to the latest release. I have still a lot to learn, but I'm eager
> to learn more about the packaging and everything around it.

Welcome to Fedora. Your achievements are quite impressive already and
we're definitely looking forward to more contributions from you.

Please consider joining the SciTech SIG:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:SciTech_SIG as this group's
interests seem to overlap with yours.

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and
oppression to develop psychic muscles.
-- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

GIMP 3.0 in F41?

[Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski]

Hi!

I noticed that GIMP 3.0 is scheduled[1] for release in June. It'd be
nice to have it in F41. Are there any plans to do so? Do the maintainers
(Cc'd) need any help?

[1] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gimp/-/issues/10373#timeline

Regards,
Dominik
-- 
Fedora   https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a pervasive need for a logical universe that
makes sense. But the real universe is always one step beyond logic.
-- from "The Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-05-06)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Text Log: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-05-06/fesco.2024-05-06-19.00.log.txt
HTML Log: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-05-06/fesco.2024-05-06-19.00.log.html
Text Minutes: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-05-06/fesco.2024-05-06-19.00.txt
HTML Minutes: 
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-05-06/fesco.2024-05-06-19.00.html

Meeting summary
---
* TOPIC: Init Process (@zbyszek:fedora.im, 19:00:54)
* TOPIC: #3204 Request for one-time Updates Policy Exception: GStreamer 1.24 
for Fedora 40
* AGREED: APPROVE (+8, 0, 0)

* TOPIC: #3200 provenpackager nomination for fche
* INFO: Request was withdrawn and may be resubmitted later on.

* TOPIC: #3186 Mandatory 2FA for all packagers
* AGREED: We want packagers to use 2FA and will start with proven
  packagers. As an initial step, the policy will be changed that
  PPs SHOULD enroll tokens for 2FA. Once the UX for packagers
  improved, we'll consider changing the policy to "MUST". (+6, 0, 0)

* TOPIC: Next week's chair
* ACTION: Tom Stellard will chair next meeting
* TOPIC: Open Floor
   * ACTION: Tom Stellard to mail admins of redhat-rpm-config for
 official access and do some reviews of open PRs.

Meeting ended at 2024-05-06 19:54:52

Action items

* Tom Stellard  will chair next meeting 
* Tom Stellard to mail admins of redhat-rpm-config for official access and do 
some reviews of open PRs. 

People Present (lines said)
---
* @zbyszek:fedora.im (65)
* @nirik:matrix.scrye.com (38)
* @tstellar:fedora.im (20)
* @zodbot:fedora.im (12)
* @mhayden:fedora.im (6)
* @jistone:fedora.im (6)
* @dcantrell:fedora.im (4)
* @humaton:fedora.im (3)
* @fche:fedora.im (3)
* @meetbot:fedora.im (2)
* @codonell:fedora.im (1)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Maxwell G]

Report started at 2024-05-06 17:14:29 UTC

The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life

Note: If you received this mail directly you (co)maintain one of the affected
packages or a package that depends on one. Please adopt the affected package or
retire your depending package to avoid broken dependencies, otherwise your
package will be retired when the affected package gets retired.

Request package ownership via the *Take* button in the left column on
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/

Full report available at:
https://a.gtmx.me/orphans/orphans.txt
grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain.

For human readable dependency chains,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/
For all orphaned packages,
see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan

Package  (co)maintainers   Status Change

bti   orphan   2 weeks ago  
container-workflow-tool   orphan   5 weeks ago  
emacs-htmlize orphan   6 weeks ago  
golang-github-elves-elvish@go-sig, orphan  2 weeks ago  
golang-github-xiaq-persistent @go-sig, orphan  2 weeks ago  
jolokia-jvm-agent orphan   4 weeks ago  
mingw-cppunit orphan   0 weeks ago  
mingw-freeimage   orphan   4 weeks ago  
mozilla-fira-fontsmaxamillion, orphan  0 weeks ago  
neofetch  orphan   0 weeks ago  
php-bantu-ini-get-wrapper adamwill, orphan 6 weeks ago  
php-christophwurst-id3parser  orphan   6 weeks ago  
php-deepdiver-zipstreamer orphan   6 weeks ago  
php-doctrine-dbal orphan, remi 6 weeks ago  
php-fgrosse-phpasn1   orphan   6 weeks ago  
php-giggsey-localeorphan   6 weeks ago  
php-league-uri-interfaces orphan   6 weeks ago  
php-opencloud-openstack   orphan   6 weeks ago  
php-opis-closure  orphan, remi 6 weeks ago  
php-pimpleorphan   6 weeks ago  
php-punic orphan   6 weeks ago  
php-scssphp   orphan   6 weeks ago  
php-stecman-symfony-console-  orphan   6 weeks ago  
completion  
prometheus-jmx-exporter   orphan   4 weeks ago  
prometheus-simpleclient-java  orphan   4 weeks ago  
python-jose   orphan   5 weeks ago  
rust-clap_lex @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks ago  
rust-digest_auth  @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks ago  
rust-lev_distance @rust-sig, orphan0 weeks ago  
rust-stratisd_proc_macros @rust-sig, bgurney, mulhern, 1 weeks ago  
  orphan
snakeyaml mizdebsk, orphan, sbluhm 4 weeks ago  
vim-editorconfig  orphan   4 weeks ago  
wdune orphan   1 weeks ago  

The following packages require above mentioned packages:
Depending on: golang-github-xiaq-persistent (1), status change: 2024-04-19 (2 
weeks ago)
golang-github-elves-elvish (maintained by: @go-sig, orphan)
golang-github-elves-elvish-0.15.0-11.fc40.src requires 
golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hash) = 0-0.12.20210113git3175cfb.fc40, 
golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hashmap) = 0-0.12.20210113git3175cfb.fc40, 
golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/vector) = 0-0.12.20210113git3175cfb.fc40
golang-github-elves-elvish-devel-0.15.0-11.fc40.noarch requires 
golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hash) = 0-0.12.20210113git3175cfb.fc40, 
golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/hashmap) = 0-0.12.20210113git3175cfb.fc40, 
golang(github.com/xiaq/persistent/vector) = 0-0.12.20210113git3175cfb.fc40

Depending on: mozilla-fira-fonts (1), status change: 2024-05-03 (0 weeks ago)
apostrophe (maintained by: atim)

Re: Feedback wanted: Testing side-tag for switching dnf5 in Rawhide

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Thu, May 02, 2024 at 01:28:19PM GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-05-02 at 15:41 -0400, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> > On 5/2/24 14:34, Gary Buhrmaster wrote:
> > > While I follow the philosophy of updating
> > > regularly, there are likely some who install Fnn, and
> > > never update, and then would expect an update to
> > > Fnn+2 to work without issue(s).
> > > --
> > 
> > The CLI update strongly suggests doing 'dnf update --refresh' before 
> > system-upgrade. It doesn't require it though.
> > 
> > I always thought it's an odd workflow; why doesn't it just force it? 
> > While it might take a long while to complete on a stale system, it's 
> > recommended anyway, isn't it?
> 
> I would actually hugely prefer we amend that to say `dnf --refresh
> offline-upgrade download; dnf offline-upgrade reboot` or so. It's a
> footgun as it stands.

Perhaps the dnf5 version could be just: 

dnf offline-upgrade

(and it automatically does --refresh and it downloads and then says "packages
downloaded, ok to reboot into the upgrade now? y/n)" ?

And if you pass it 'download' or 'reboot' it only does those steps?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: calendar.fp.o pointing to obsolete IRC for meetings

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, May 04, 2024 at 11:32:21AM GMT, Dominik Wombacher wrote:
> On 5/3/24 8:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > 
> > So, help would definitely be welcome fixing the matrix/irc issues in the
> > code, and then we could look at mass updating it.
> > 
> 
> I briefly looked into it, can be an easy fix. I put a comment into the
> open issue for matrix support in fedocal:
> https://pagure.io/fedocal/issue/213
> I suggest to label it as easyfix/good-first-issue and maybe someone is
> interested and has the time to work on it :)

ok. 

I don't know if anyone is really watching things there, but I will try
and find someone to do so. ;)

> > Or perhaps we should be looking at retiring fedocal, but would probibly
> > want an open source alternative we could use or deploy.
> 
> Are there other use-cases that are not covered by fedocal but urgently
> required?

Not that I know of. 

> If the main pain points are minor issue like the matrix url support in
> the meeting location, I would suggest to fix the current code.
> That's then still much less time consuming compared to replacing it with
> something else.

Agreed.

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

[Maxwell G]

On Fri May 3, 2024, Maxwell G wrote:
> Report started at 2024-04-27 20:06:57 UTC

Apologizes, I accidentally sent an outdated report. I will resend later
today.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Return-from-sleep display problems

[Christopher]

For a while now, I've noticed that whenever Fedora returns from sleep,
the native display resolution for at least one of my monitors seems to
be missing, and my display settings get messed up for multiple
monitors. I have a laptop with 3:2 ratio (from frame.work) whose
native resolution is 2256x1504. That one is not the problem. Then, I
have 2 HDMI monitors that are FHD 1920x1080, and 1 DisplayPort USB-C
monitor that is also FHD 1920x1080 natively. However, whenever I
return from sleep, the DisplayPort USB-C monitor is limited to 59.89Hz
and 1440x900 (16:10, instead of 16:9 ratio). The only 16:9 ratio
resolution available is 1280x720. There are a couple of 4:3
resolutions, one 5:4 resolution, and two 16:10 resolutions available.
None of these are native to the display, though, so I have no idea why
Gnome display settings is suggesting these. In addition, the monitor
does not seem to be recognized as the same monitor that was plugged in
when the computer went to sleep, so not only is the resolution
changed, but the order moves around as well. Instead of being
configured to the left of the other monitors, as I have it configured,
it gets moved to in-between the two HDMI monitors (the laptop display
is 1, the one that gets mangled is 3, and the other two monitors are
identified as 2 and 4; my preferred order is from left-to-right
3-1-2-4, but it changes to 1-2-3-4). The only thing that seems to work
is to completely shut off the computer and reboot.

I've also previously tried different set-ups, including using 1 HDMI
port and 2 DisplayPort, and 3 HDMI connections. Those sometimes work
for a time, but then one of them inevitably stops working entirely,
and I have to change things around again. None of these problems exist
on Windows, so I know it's not the hardware. I have set the "Screen
Blank" option to "Never" in the power saving settings. However, when I
lock my screen, the displays still go blank and the displays sleep. I
have also tried various xrandr commands that are suggested on various
forums, to force the use of 1920x1080, but although those sometimes
seem to work from the command-line, GNOME seems completely unaffected,
and will not provide the option to use 1920x1080.

I think I can distill these numerous issues down to a few specific points:

1. Fedora is not preserving display settings before and after sleep,
2. Fedora's default list of resolutions when it fails to recognize a
monitor's native resolution does not include the most commonly
supported resolution of FHD 1920x1080 at 60Hz and instead makes a
separate list of resolutions available (and these don't seem
configurable and it's not clear where they are even coming from),
3. Fedora/GNOME does not provide an option to prevent displays from
sleeping to avoid these issues, when the screen is locked.

Of these, #1 is the main problem, whereas #2 and #3 might help work
around the problem, but are not currently available in Fedora.

Any suggestions welcome. Google'ing for a solution has worn me out...
numerous people have the same issue (not all in Fedora), but nobody
seems to have a solution that works for me.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278464] perl-Devel-CheckOS-2.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278464

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Devel-CheckOS-2.01-1.f
   ||c41
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2024-05-06 14:23:52



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-d27e47b7b7 (perl-Devel-CheckOS-2.01-1.fc41) has been pushed to the
Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278464

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278464%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278464] perl-Devel-CheckOS-2.01 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278464

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-d27e47b7b7 (perl-Devel-CheckOS-2.01-1.fc41) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-d27e47b7b7


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278464

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278464%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

[Neal Gompa]

On Mon, May 6, 2024 at 8:17 AM Leon Fauster via devel
 wrote:
>
> Am 06.05.24 um 13:56 schrieb Florian Festi:
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > RPM has deprecated the %patchN syntax in favor of %patch -PN where N is
> > the patch number for a year now. See the RPM documentation for more
> > information [1]. In current RPM versions, this syntax only emits a
> > deprecation warning, but support for this syntax has been removed
> > completely in the upcoming RPM 4.20 release. As it will be added in
> > Fedora soon [2] it is time to switch over to the new syntax now.
> >
> > There are around 1800 packages that still use the old syntax. Later this
> > week/next week, we will run this script [3] over the affected packages
> > [4][5] to update them to the modern patch syntax. For example, the
> > script will change:
> >
> > %patch0 -p1 → %patch -P0 -p1
> > %patch0005 -p2 → %patch -P0005 -p2
> >
>
>
> Is this supported by rpm in RHEL8/9 (EPEL8/9 builds)?
>

Yes. It's been supported for a very long time.



-- 
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

[Leon Fauster via devel]

Am 06.05.24 um 13:56 schrieb Florian Festi:

Hi everyone,

RPM has deprecated the %patchN syntax in favor of %patch -PN where N is
the patch number for a year now. See the RPM documentation for more
information [1]. In current RPM versions, this syntax only emits a
deprecation warning, but support for this syntax has been removed
completely in the upcoming RPM 4.20 release. As it will be added in
Fedora soon [2] it is time to switch over to the new syntax now.

There are around 1800 packages that still use the old syntax. Later this
week/next week, we will run this script [3] over the affected packages
[4][5] to update them to the modern patch syntax. For example, the
script will change:

%patch0 -p1 → %patch -P0 -p1
%patch0005 -p2 → %patch -P0005 -p2




Is this supported by rpm in RHEL8/9 (EPEL8/9 builds)?




--
Leon

--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

[Miroslav Suchý]

Dne 06. 05. 24 v 1:56 odp. Florian Festi napsal(a):

RPM has deprecated the %patchN syntax in favor of %patch -PN where N is
the patch number for a year now. See the RPM documentation for more
information [1]. In current RPM versions, this syntax only emits a
deprecation warning, but support for this syntax has been removed
completely in the upcoming RPM 4.20 release. As it will be added in
Fedora soon [2] it is time to switch over to the new syntax now.


Packages maintained by Tito will be affected by this. But only builds that uses DistributionBuilder or UpstreamBuilder 
builder. Afaik no packages that goes to Fedora uses this so it should not affect any Fedora maintainer.


Adding link to issue I just created for reference: 
https://github.com/rpm-software-management/tito/issues/499

And thank you for doing this change.

--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278129] perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005-1.fc41
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2024-05-06 12:50:52



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-139e6a2bac (perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005-1.fc41) has been pushed to the
Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278129%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278129] perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-527f57dd1b (perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005-1.fc40) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-527f57dd1b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278129%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278129] perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-139e6a2bac (perl-DBD-MySQL-5.005-1.fc41) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-139e6a2bac


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278129

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278129%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20240506.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20240505.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20240506.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images:  3
Added packages:  0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages:   102
Downgraded packages: 1

Size of added packages:  0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded packages:   637.27 MiB
Size of downgraded packages: 2.85 MiB

Size change of upgraded packages:   9.82 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: -439.88 KiB

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Python_Classroom raw-xz aarch64
Path: 
Labs/aarch64/images/Fedora-Python-Classroom-Rawhide-20240506.n.0.aarch64.raw.xz
Image: LXQt live aarch64
Path: Spins/aarch64/iso/Fedora-LXQt-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20240506.n.0.iso

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Workstation live-osbuild aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-osb-Rawhide-20240505.n.0.aarch64.iso
Image: Workstation live aarch64
Path: 
Workstation/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-aarch64-Rawhide-20240505.n.0.iso
Image: Workstation live-osbuild x86_64
Path: 
Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-osb-Rawhide-20240505.n.0.x86_64.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =

= DROPPED PACKAGES =

= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  apt-2.9.2-1.fc41
Old package:  apt-2.9.1-1.fc41
Summary:  Command-line package manager for Debian packages
RPMs: apt apt-apidoc apt-devel apt-doc apt-libs apt-utils
Size: 14.72 MiB
Size change:  101.47 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Apr 22 2024 Packit  - 2.9.2-1
  - Update to version 2.9.2
  - Resolves: rhbz#2274776


Package:  attract-mode-2.7.0-9.fc41
Old package:  attract-mode-2.7.0-8.fc40
Summary:  A graphical front-end for command line emulators
RPMs: attract-mode attract-mode-data
Size: 13.50 MiB
Size change:  -13.04 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun May 05 2024 Robert-Andr?? Mauchin  - 2.7.0-9
  - Add compatibility with FFMPEG 7.0


Package:  aws-c-common-0.9.17-3.fc41
Old package:  aws-c-common-0.6.14-11.fc40
Summary:  Core c99 package for AWS SDK for C
RPMs: aws-c-common aws-c-common-devel aws-c-common-libs
Added RPMs:   aws-c-common
Size: 1.03 MiB
Size change:  -118.87 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat May 04 2024 Packit  - 0.9.17-1
  - Update to version 0.9.17
  - Resolves: rhbz#2246663


Package:  bgpq4-1.13-1.fc41
Old package:  bgpq4-1.12-1.fc41
Summary:  Automate BGP filter generation based on routing database 
information
RPMs: bgpq4
Size: 244.11 KiB
Size change:  -1.12 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon May 06 2024 Robert Scheck  1.13-1
  - Upgrade to 1.13 (#2278792)


Package:  breeze-icon-theme-6.2.0-1.fc41
Old package:  breeze-icon-theme-6.1.0-1.fc41
Summary:  Breeze icon theme
RPMs: breeze-icon-theme breeze-icon-theme-devel breeze-icon-theme-rcc
Size: 12.68 MiB
Size change:  17.18 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sat May 04 2024 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 6.2.0-1
  - 6.2.0


Package:  cairo-dock-3.5.99^20240505git13fb151-1.fc41
Old package:  cairo-dock-3.5.99^20240501git1f31686-1.fc41
Summary:  Light eye-candy fully themable animated dock
RPMs: cairo-dock cairo-dock-core cairo-dock-devel cairo-dock-libs
Size: 8.12 MiB
Size change:  314.06 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun May 05 2024 Mamoru TASAKA  - 
3.5.99^20240505git13fb151-1
  - Update to the latest git (20240505git13fb151)
  - Enable Wayfire IPC support


Package:  corectrl-1.4.0-2.fc41
Old package:  corectrl-1.3.11-1.fc41
Summary:  Friendly hardware control
RPMs: corectrl
Size: 3.48 MiB
Size change:  -417.42 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun May 05 2024 Artem Polishchuk  - 1.4.0-2
  - RPMAUTOSPEC: unresolvable merge


Package:  extra-cmake-modules-6.2.0-1.fc41
Old package:  extra-cmake-modules-6.1.0-1.fc41
Summary:  Additional modules for CMake build system
RPMs: extra-cmake-modules extra-cmake-modules-doc
Size: 356.20 KiB
Size change:  -678 B
Changelog:
  * Sat May 04 2024 Marc Deop i Argem??  - 6.2.0-1
  - 6.2.0


Package:  fractal-7-1.fc41
Old package:  fractal-6-1.fc40
Summary:  Matrix group messaging app
RPMs: fractal
Size: 74.68 MiB
Size change:  7.86 MiB
Changelog:
  * Sun May 05 2024 Pete Walter  - 7-1
  - Update to 7


Package:  gimp-2:2.10.38-1.fc41
Old package:  gimp-2:2.10.36-9.fc41
Summary:  GNU Image Manipulation Program
RPMs: gimp gimp-devel gimp-devel-tools gimp-libs
Size: 92.60 MiB
Size change:  156.28 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun May 05 2024 Nils Philippsen  - 2:2.10.38-1
  - Update to version 2.10.38


Package:  golang-x-sys-0.20.0-1.fc41
Old package:  golang-x-sys-0.19.0-1.fc41
Summary:  Go packages for low-level interaction with the operating system
RPMs: golang-x-sys-devel
Size: 545.58 KiB
Size change:  30.40 KiB
Changelog:
  * Sun May 05 2024 Mark E. Fuller  - 0.20.0-1
  - update to 0.20.0, close rhbz#2279138


Package:  golang-x-text-0.15.0-1.fc41
Old package:  golang-x-text-0.14.0-7.fc41
Summary:  Go text processing support

[Bug 2277607] perl-Module-Faker-0.026 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277607

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
   Fixed In Version||perl-Module-Faker-0.026-1.f
   ||c41
Last Closed||2024-05-06 11:59:55



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6179621d69 (perl-Module-Faker-0.026-1.fc41) has been pushed to the
Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277607

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277607%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2277607] perl-Module-Faker-0.026 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277607

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6179621d69 (perl-Module-Faker-0.026-1.fc41) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6179621d69


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277607

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277607%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

[Florian Festi]

Hi everyone,

RPM has deprecated the %patchN syntax in favor of %patch -PN where N is
the patch number for a year now. See the RPM documentation for more
information [1]. In current RPM versions, this syntax only emits a
deprecation warning, but support for this syntax has been removed
completely in the upcoming RPM 4.20 release. As it will be added in
Fedora soon [2] it is time to switch over to the new syntax now.

There are around 1800 packages that still use the old syntax. Later this
week/next week, we will run this script [3] over the affected packages
[4][5] to update them to the modern patch syntax. For example, the
script will change:

%patch0 -p1 → %patch -P0 -p1
%patch0005 -p2 → %patch -P0005 -p2

If anyone has any objections or would like to exclude a package, please
let me know.

As this change does not affect the resulting binary packages an
immediate rebuild is not needed. The change will "only" ensure the
packages still build with the new version of RPM.

This is the change with the highest compatibility (back to RPM 3.x).
There are more modern options (like %autosetup) that packagers are
encouraged to use but are out of scope here.

Florian

[1] https://rpm-software-management.github.io/rpm/manual/spec.html#patch-1
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.20
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:User-Ffesti-new_patch_syntax.sh
[4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:User-Ffesti-patchNN-packages.txt
[5]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/File:User-Ffesti-patchNN-package-owners.txt
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: OCaml flambda optimizations causing a compilation slow down

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 09:54:01AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:16:45AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Richard W. M. Jones:
> > 
> > > This email is mostly to notify that this is happening.  I'm not sure
> > > if a single package slowing down compilation means we need to do
> > > anything here, but if anyone else sees similar symptoms, let us know.
> > 
> > What blocks you from profiling it and fixing the performance issue?
> 
> I did profile it down to a couple of functions in a very dark corner
> of the compiler (see the thread on cocci devel list that I posted).
> However in the time available last week I didn't have the time to
> understand what it was doing or fix it.

(https://lore.kernel.org/cocci/20240502173148.gf30...@redhat.com/)

I was thinking about filing an upstream bug, but this comment is
interesting (not the bug itself, since the specific problem there is
different):

https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/issues/10014#issuecomment-725270460

Some things we could take away from this:

(1) It's expected.

(2) They're not going to fix it as they're working on an even newer
optimizer.

(3) You can add -Oclassic to affected files to get the regular
optimizer.  [This isn't exactly what the option does, but using it
does fix the issue.]

My proposed fix / workaround:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/coccinelle/pull-request/4

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-05-06)

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org
on Matrix.

To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto

or run:
  date -d '2024-05-06 19:00 UTC'

Links to all issues to be discussed can be found at: 
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

= Discussed and Voted in the Ticket =

#3202 Change: Python Built with gcc -O3
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3202
APPROVED (+3, 0, 0)

#3201 Change: Reproducible Package Builds
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3201
APPROVED (+5, 0, 0)


= Followups =


= New business =

#3204 Request for one-time Updates Policy Exception: GStreamer 1.24 for Fedora 
40
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3204

#3200 provenpackager nomination for fche
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3200

#3186 Mandatory 2FA for all packagers
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3186


= Open Floor = 

For more complete details, please visit each individual
issue.  The report of the agenda items can be found at
https://pagure.io/fesco/report/meeting_agenda

If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can
reply to this e-mail, file a new issue at
https://pagure.io/fesco, e-mail me directly, or bring it
up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: OCaml flambda optimizations causing a compilation slow down

[Richard W.M. Jones]

On Mon, May 06, 2024 at 10:16:45AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
> 
> > This email is mostly to notify that this is happening.  I'm not sure
> > if a single package slowing down compilation means we need to do
> > anything here, but if anyone else sees similar symptoms, let us know.
> 
> What blocks you from profiling it and fixing the performance issue?

I did profile it down to a couple of functions in a very dark corner
of the compiler (see the thread on cocci devel list that I posted).
However in the time available last week I didn't have the time to
understand what it was doing or fix it.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8d89e9ee9f (perl-Graphics-TIFF-21-1.el9) has been submitted as
an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-8d89e9ee9f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c5
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-3de8ba209f (perl-Graphics-TIFF-21-1.fc38) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3de8ba209f


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c4
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-3a9183cf5b (perl-Graphics-TIFF-21-1.fc39) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 39.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-3a9183cf5b


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-6002b14f95 (perl-Graphics-TIFF-21-1.fc40) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-6002b14f95


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Graphics-TIFF-21-1.fc4
   ||1
 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar  ---
A bug-fix release suitable for all Fedoras and EPEL ≥ 9.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202278978%23c1
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2278978] perl-Graphics-TIFF-21 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC|ppi...@redhat.com   |
   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2278978
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2277638] perl-App-cpm-0.997017 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277638

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-App-cpm-0.997.017-1.fc
   ||41
 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2024-05-06 08:17:52



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-b1bbc0ef04 (perl-App-cpm-0.997.017-1.fc41) has been pushed to the
Fedora 41 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277638

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277638%23c3
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: OCaml flambda optimizations causing a compilation slow down

[Florian Weimer]

* Richard W. M. Jones:

> This email is mostly to notify that this is happening.  I'm not sure
> if a single package slowing down compilation means we need to do
> anything here, but if anyone else sees similar symptoms, let us know.

What blocks you from profiling it and fixing the performance issue?

Thanks,
Florian
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2277638] perl-App-cpm-0.997017 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277638

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-2024-b1bbc0ef04 (perl-App-cpm-0.997.017-1.fc41) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 41.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-b1bbc0ef04


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277638

Report this comment as SPAM: 
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202277638%23c2
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2277607] perl-Module-Faker-0.026 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277607
Bug 2277607 depends on bug 2277730, which changed state.

Bug 2277730 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Fake - Declaratively generate 
fake structured data for testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277730

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277607
--
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue