[Bug 2184301] perl-Syntax-Feature-Loop-1.8.0-18.fc39 FTBFS: t/01_basic.t and 3 more tests fail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Release Engineering --- Dear Maintainer, your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 39. Action is required from you. If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report. Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2023-05-30). A week before the mass branching of Fedora 40 according to the schedule [3], any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 38 will be retired regardless of the status of this bug. [1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ [2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/ [3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-40/f-40-key-tasks.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2184301 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202184301%23c11 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Test-Announce] Kernel 6.9 Test Week 2024-05-26 to 2024-06-02
Hey All, I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.9 Test week is happening from 2024-05-26 to 2024-06-02. It's fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your results. As usual, the Fedora QA team will hangout at #fedora-test-...@libera.chat for questions and discussion. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Day:2024-05-26_Kernel_6.9_Test_Week https://testdays.fedoraproject.org/events/187 -- //sumantro Fedora QE TRIED AND PERSONALLY TESTED, ERGO TRUSTED -- ___ test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-17176c2215 cacti-1.2.27-1.el9 cacti-spine-1.2.27-1.el9 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-1f1aef9c1c roundcubemail-1.5.7-1.el9 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-3184c14a07 chromium-125.0.6422.76-1.el9 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-74745ddb2a helix-24.03-3.el9 rust-askalono-cli-0.4.6-9.el9 rust-bat-0.24.0-4.el9 rust-bindgen-cli-0.69.4-2.el9 rust-bitvec_helpers-3.1.4-1.el9 rust-cbindgen-0.26.0-3.el9 rust-difftastic-0.57.0-2.el9 rust-dolby_vision-3.3.0-2.el9 rust-dua-cli-2.29.0-2.el9 rust-eza-0.17.3-3.el9 rust-fd-find-9.0.0-3.el9 rust-git-delta-0.16.5-10.el9 rust-handlebars-5.1.2-2.el9 rust-hyperfine-1.18.0-3.el9 rust-is_ci-1.2.0-2.el9 rust-lscolors-0.17.0-2.el9 rust-nu-0.91.0-2.el9 rust-oxipng-9.1.1-3.el9 rust-pore-0.1.11-2.el9 rust-pretty-bytes-0.2.0-6.el9 rust-procs-0.14.4-5.el9 rust-pulldown-cmark-0.10.3-2.el9 rust-rav1e-0.7.1-2.el9 rust-ripgrep-14.1.0-3.el9 rust-routinator-0.13.2-2.el9 rust-routinator-ui-0.3.4-2.el9 rust-rpki-0.18.1-2.el9 rust-sd-1.0.0-2.el9 rust-sequoia-keyring-linter-1.0.1-7.el9 rust-sequoia-policy-config-0.6.0-8.el9 rust-sequoia-sq-0.35.0-2.el9 rust-sequoia-wot-0.11.0-4.el9 rust-sha1collisiondetection-0.3.4-2.el9 rust-szip-1 .0.0-7.el9 rust-termbg-0.4.4-3.el9 rust-tokei-12.1.2-9.el9 rust-weezl-0.1.8-2.el9 rust-zoxide-0.9.2-3.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing qownnotes-24.5.8-1.el9 Details about builds: qownnotes-24.5.8-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-f52d834ad7) Plain-text file markdown note taking with Nextcloud integration Update Information: Automatic update for qownnotes-24.5.8-1.el9. Changelog for qownnotes * Sat May 25 2024 Packit - 24.5.8-1 - Update to 24.5.8 upstream release - Resolves: rhbz#2282810 * Sat May 18 2024 Packit - 24.5.4-1 - Update to 24.5.4 upstream release - Resolves: rhbz#2281405 * Fri May 17 2024 Packit - 24.5.2-1 - Update to 24.5.2 upstream release - Resolves: rhbz#2280920 ChangeLog: * Sat May 25 2024 Packit - 24.5.8-1 - Update to 24.5.8 upstream release - Resolves: rhbz#2282810 * Sat May 18 2024 Packit - 24.5.4-1 - Update to 24.5.4 upstream release - Resolves: rhbz#2281405 References: [ 1 ] Bug #2280920 - qownnotes-24.5.2 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2280920 [ 2 ] Bug #2281405 - qownnotes-24.5.4 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281405 [ 3 ] Bug #2282810 - qownnotes-24.5.8 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282810 -- ___ epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-4ea9ddc0f7 cacti-1.2.27-1.el8 cacti-spine-1.2.27-1.el8 2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-1a95b76e46 chromium-125.0.6422.76-1.el8 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing python3.12-dns-epel-2.3.0-1.el8 python3.12-jinja2-epel-3.1.3-1.el8 python3.12-jmespath-epel-1.0.1-1.el8 python3.12-kerberos-epel-1.3.1-1.el8 python3.12-markupsafe-epel-2.1.5-1.el8 python3.12-netaddr-epel-1.2.1-1.el8 python3.12-ntlm-auth-epel-1.5.0-1.el8 python3.12-requests_ntlm-epel-1.2.0-1.el8 python3.12-six-epel-1.16.0-1.el8 python3.12-spnego-epel-0.10.2-1.el8 python3.12-xmltodict-epel-0.13.0-1.el8 Details about builds: python3.12-dns-epel-2.3.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d3da4a1014) DNS toolkit for Python Update Information: Build for Python 3.12 for EPEL8 ChangeLog: * Thu May 23 2024 Orion Poplawski - 2.3.0-1 - EPEL package for Python 3.12 python3.12-jinja2-epel-3.1.3-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d3da4a1014) General purpose template engine Update Information: Build for Python 3.12 for EPEL8 ChangeLog: * Fri May 24 2024 Orion Poplawski - 3.1.3-1 - Build for EPEL with Python 3.12 python3.12-jmespath-epel-1.0.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d3da4a1014) JSON Matching Expressions Update Information: Build for Python 3.12 for EPEL8 ChangeLog: * Thu May 23 2024 Orion Poplawski - 1.0.1-1 - EPEL package for Python 3.12 python3.12-kerberos-epel-1.3.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d3da4a1014) A high-level wrapper for Kerberos (GSSAPI) operations Update Information: Build for Python 3.12 for EPEL8 ChangeLog: * Thu May 23 2024 Orion Poplawski - 1.3.1-1 - Build for EPEL with Python 3.12 python3.12-markupsafe-epel-2.1.5-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d3da4a1014) Implements a XML/HTML/XHTML Markup safe string for Python Update Information: Build for Python 3.12 for EPEL8 ChangeLog: * Fri May 24 2024 Orion Poplawski - 2.1.5-1 - Build for EPEL with Python 3.12 python3.12-netaddr-epel-1.2.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d3da4a1014) A pure Python network address representation and manipulation library Update Information: Build for Python 3.12 for EPEL8 ChangeLog: * Thu May 23 2024 Orion Poplawski - 1.2.1-1 - Build for Python 3.12 python3.12-ntlm-auth-epel-1.5.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2024-d3da4a1014) Python 3 compatible NTLM library (requires md4, thus legacy OpenSSL settings) Update Information: Build for Python 3.12 for EPEL8 ChangeLog: * Thu May 23 2024 Orion Poplawski - 1.5.0-1 - EPEL package for Python 3.12
Re: Self Introduction: Jose Fernandez
Welcome to Fedora! On Sat, May 25, 2024, 09:37 Jose Fernandez wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm Jose. I work at Netflix on the Compute Runtime team. We manage the > multi-tenant container runtime and the base OS (Ubuntu-based). My expertise > is in observability, performance, and reliability. My current focus is on > container technology, the Linux kernel, CPU schedulers, and eBPF. > > I recently became a Kernel contributor with patches to bpf [1] and amdgpu > [2]. > I'm the author and maintainer of bpftop [3], a process monitor for eBPF > apps > built with Rust that leverages libbpf-rs and ratatui. > > I'm beginning to get involved in the sched_ext [4] project, primarily > contributing to libbpf-rs and scx_rustland, the Rust-based user-space CPU > scheduler. > > My main topic is packaging bpftop for Fedora [5]. I'm working on packaging > the missing crates [6] [7] and looking for a sponsor. > > I'm looking forward to learning more about Fedora and the packaging > ecosystem. > > - Jose > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ce09cbdd97662546a1175bcfdfc6c8fdd150 > [2] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=130afc8a886183a94cf6eab7d24f300014ff87ba > [3] https://github.com/Netflix/bpftop > [4] https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/285 > [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2281565 > [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2282282 > [7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2282804 > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2283268] New: perl-Module-Faker-0.027 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283268 Bug ID: 2283268 Summary: perl-Module-Faker-0.027 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Module-Faker Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: jples...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 0.027 Upstream release that is considered latest: 0.027 Current version/release in rawhide: 0.026-1.fc41 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/Module-Faker/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/6989/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Module-Faker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283268 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283268%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Self Introduction: Jose Fernandez
> Hello, Josh try making an issue in packager-sponsors as well > https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue Thank you for the suggestion. I found a sponsor via the issue tracker. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: [HEADS-UP] GStreamer 1.24 landing in Fedora 40 soon
On Sat, May 25, 2024 at 12:18 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > Hi all, > > The Multimedia SIG has been working on rebasing GStreamer from 1.22 to > 1.24 in Fedora 40. The update has now been submitted to bodhi: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-2aa4a3bbf0 I've set high limits for stable karma to make sure the update doesn't get pushed to stable too quickly. Please let us know if there are any GStreamer-related issues. The Multimedia SIG and some GStreamer upstream devs are in #multimedia:fedoraproject.org on matrix. Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Understanding noopenh264 in Fedora
On 25-05-2024 16:56, Leigh Scott wrote: ffmpeg Two more packages depend on it currently: $ fedrq wrsrc -Xs noopenh264 ffmpeg-6.1.1-13.fc41.src gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.24.3-1.fc41.src qt6-qtwebengine-6.7.1-1.fc41.src -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2283238] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.032 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283238 Bug ID: 2283238 Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-6.032 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Dist-Zilla Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 6.032 Upstream release that is considered latest: 6.032 Current version/release in rawhide: 6.031-3.fc40 URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Dist-Zilla/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5898/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Dist-Zilla -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283238 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283238%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Self Introduction: Jose Fernandez
Hello, Josh try making an issue in packager-sponsors as well https://pagure.io/packager-sponsors/issue Original Message On 5/25/24 18:06, Jose Fernandez wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'm Jose. I work at Netflix on the Compute Runtime team. We manage the > multi-tenant container runtime and the base OS (Ubuntu-based). My expertise > is in observability, performance, and reliability. My current focus is on > container technology, the Linux kernel, CPU schedulers, and eBPF. > > I recently became a Kernel contributor with patches to bpf [1] and amdgpu > [2]. > I'm the author and maintainer of bpftop [3], a process monitor for eBPF apps > built with Rust that leverages libbpf-rs and ratatui. > > I'm beginning to get involved in the sched_ext [4] project, primarily > contributing to libbpf-rs and scx_rustland, the Rust-based user-space CPU > scheduler. > > My main topic is packaging bpftop for Fedora [5]. I'm working on packaging > the missing crates [6] [7] and looking for a sponsor. > > I'm looking forward to learning more about Fedora and the packaging > ecosystem. > > - Jose > > [1] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ce09cbdd97662546a1175bcfdfc6c8fdd150 > [2] > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=130afc8a886183a94cf6eab7d24f300014ff87ba > [3] https://github.com/Netflix/bpftop > [4] https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/285 > [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2281565 > [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2282282 > [7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2282804 > -- > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Understanding noopenh264 in Fedora
ffmpeg https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ffmpeg/c/db2acb3681a85baed6bbc897cdac792d4b7d7c5f?branch=rawhide -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: Understanding noopenh264 in Fedora
On Sat, May 25 2024 at 12:55:05 PM +00:00:00, Byoungchan Lee via devel wrote: Is my understanding correct? Yes! That said, we're considering adding the Firefox plugin as well [1] so we can finally make Firefox support OpenH264 without requiring user intervention [2]. [1] https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/noopenh264/-/merge_requests/12 [2] https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/84#comment-899202 I also have some additional questions: 1. How is noopenh264 currently used in Fedora? Are there any package build dependencies that utilize it? noopenh264 is installed by default in Fedora Workstation. Then during the first system update, it should get replaced by the real openh264 package from Cisco's repository. I'm not sure if anything build depends on it yet. 2. I came across jgrulich's pull request for the Chromium package that proposes using dlopen with OpenH264 ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/29 ). I also found a WebRTC changelist addressing a similar issue ( https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/349301 ). Are these changes related to noopenh264? No. That's an example of what you no longer need to do now that noopenh264 is available in Fedora. Previously, dlopen() was required since you cannot build depend on the real openh264. Now, you can build depend on noopenh264 instead. Michael -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Self Introduction: Jose Fernandez
Hi folks, I'm Jose. I work at Netflix on the Compute Runtime team. We manage the multi-tenant container runtime and the base OS (Ubuntu-based). My expertise is in observability, performance, and reliability. My current focus is on container technology, the Linux kernel, CPU schedulers, and eBPF. I recently became a Kernel contributor with patches to bpf [1] and amdgpu [2]. I'm the author and maintainer of bpftop [3], a process monitor for eBPF apps built with Rust that leverages libbpf-rs and ratatui. I'm beginning to get involved in the sched_ext [4] project, primarily contributing to libbpf-rs and scx_rustland, the Rust-based user-space CPU scheduler. My main topic is packaging bpftop for Fedora [5]. I'm working on packaging the missing crates [6] [7] and looking for a sponsor. I'm looking forward to learning more about Fedora and the packaging ecosystem. - Jose [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=ce09cbdd97662546a1175bcfdfc6c8fdd150 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=130afc8a886183a94cf6eab7d24f300014ff87ba [3] https://github.com/Netflix/bpftop [4] https://github.com/sched-ext/scx/pull/285 [5] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2281565 [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2282282 [7] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2282804 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Understanding noopenh264 in Fedora
Understanding noopenh264 in Fedora Hello, as a software engineer who are working on multimedia applications, and a Fedora user, I have some questions about how noopenh264 is used in Fedora. Here's what I've gathered so far: 1. Patent-encumbered codecs like H.264 are a challenge for the FOSS community. 2. Cisco open-sourced their H.264 codec implementation, OpenH264, making it royalty-free for binary distribution. Fedora can utilize it from the separate fedora-cisco-openh264 repository. 3. noopenh264 is a library that copies only the header files from OpenH264. This allows FOSS community to build other software that uses H.264 without directly linking to the OpenH264 library itself. 4. Making H.264 available in Fedora is crucial because H.264 is widely used in industry and web content. Is my understanding correct? If not, please let me know. I also have some additional questions: 1. How is noopenh264 currently used in Fedora? Are there any package build dependencies that utilize it? 2. I came across jgrulich's pull request for the Chromium package that proposes using dlopen with OpenH264 ( https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/chromium/pull-request/29 ). I also found a WebRTC changelist addressing a similar issue ( https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/c/src/+/349301 ). Are these changes related to noopenh264? Thanks. -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[Bug 2283203] New: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240525 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283203 Bug ID: 2283203 Summary: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-5.20240525 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee: jples...@redhat.com Reporter: upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: iarn...@gmail.com, jples...@redhat.com, mspa...@redhat.com, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Releases retrieved: 5.20240525 Upstream release that is considered latest: 5.20240525 Current version/release in rawhide: 5.20240427-1.fc41 URL: https://metacpan.org/dist/CPAN-Perl-Releases/ Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/ More information about the service that created this bug can be found at: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Upstream_Release_Monitoring Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added upstream. Based on the information from Anitya: https://release-monitoring.org/project/5881/ To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283203 Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla=report-spam_desc=Report%20of%20Bug%202283203%23c0 -- ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
[HEADS-UP] GStreamer 1.24 landing in Fedora 40 soon
Hi all, The Multimedia SIG has been working on rebasing GStreamer from 1.22 to 1.24 in Fedora 40. We requested an exception to the Updates Policy, which was granted by FESCo: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/3204 This ticket also has more background why updating from 1.22 to 1.24 is desirable. The builds for GStreamer 1.24 itself are already done in a side-tag, and I will handle the necessary rebuilds (apparently things need to be rebuilt for the gstreamer-plugins-bad 1.22 -> 1.24 update): - caja-extensions - cheese - fractal - gnome-sound-recorder - gnome-subtitles - gtk4 - libva-nvidia-driver - nheko - pitivi - qt5-qtmultimedia - qt5-qtwebkit - qt6-qtmultimedia - snapshot - webkit2gtk4.0 - webkitgtk - wxGTK Fabio -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: small logic issue with system upgrades
Dnia Fri, May 24, 2024 at 01:33:44PM +0200, Marius Schwarz napisał(a): > Am 24.05.24 um 12:01 schrieb Roberto Ragusa: > > On 5/22/24 16:33, Marius Schwarz wrote: > > > > > So, atm, the server has a sshd that says, that openssl is newer as > > > the required openssl version. It does not start it nor can the > > > running sshd, that runs the upgrade connection, fork a new instance. > > > In other words: no login possible to rescue or recover the upgrade > > > session remotely. > > > > Why can't sshd fork a new instance? > > you have ask the sshd devs. > > First guess: they do not use fork(). The whole premise of this thread comes from doing incorrect, unsupported system upgrade on live system. Look, this method is even described with red Warning frame: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/upgrading-fedora-new-release/#_can_i_upgrade_between_fedora_linux_releases_using_only_dnf There's no need to continue digressing wrt sshd behaviour. -- Tomasz TorczOnly gods can safely risk perfection, to...@pipebreaker.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man. — Alia -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
