Hangs with pkgs GIT
Hi All Git hangs and didnt complete ... http://i.imgur.com/TyQ8I3l.png Regards Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Hangs with pkgs GIT
No it didn't work ... http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png Subject: Re: Hangs with pkgs GIT To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org From: pe...@thecodergeek.com Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:51:10 -0700 On 07/12/2015 10:38 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > Git hangs and didnt complete ... > > http://i.imgur.com/TyQ8I3l.png Without any specific error message it's hard to know what precisely is causing the problem. Could it be that your certificate is invalid? This has happened in the past (for example, #1207178 [1]). Try regenerating your certificate with `fedora-cert -n` and see if that resolves the issue. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1207178 Hope that helps. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Hangs with pkgs GIT
New Bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242625 From: moc...@hotmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: RE: Hangs with pkgs GIT Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:28:13 +0200 No it didn't work ... http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png Subject: Re: Hangs with pkgs GIT To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org From: pe...@thecodergeek.com Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 22:51:10 -0700 On 07/12/2015 10:38 PM, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > Git hangs and didnt complete ... > > http://i.imgur.com/TyQ8I3l.png Without any specific error message it's hard to know what precisely is causing the problem. Could it be that your certificate is invalid? This has happened in the past (for example, #1207178 [1]). Try regenerating your certificate with `fedora-cert -n` and see if that resolves the issue. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1207178 Hope that helps. -- Peter Gordon (codergeek42) Who am I? :: http://thecodergeek.com/about-me -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Hangs with pkgs GIT
Now it works !! Was it server problem or software one ?!? Bug 1239384 FIXED fedpkg clone barry Cloning into 'barry'... remote: Counting objects: 443, done. remote: Compressing objects: 100% (318/318), done. remote: Total 443 (delta 200), reused 226 (delta 109) Receiving objects: 100% (443/443), 67.94 KiB | 0 bytes/s, done. Resolving deltas: 100% (200/200), done. Checking connectivity... done. Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 13:38:42 -0600 From: ke...@scrye.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Hangs with pkgs GIT On Mon, 13 Jul 2015 19:28:13 +0200 مصعب الزعبي wrote: > No it didn't work ... > > http://i.imgur.com/9mjEC8a.png And it hangs there forever? Can you ping pkgs.fedoraproject.org ? I see logins from you, perhaps there's just some slow or difficult network between you and pkgs. kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
COPR fail to build on F20
DEBUG util.py:378: failure: repodata/repomd.xml from updates: [Errno 256] No more mirrors to try. DEBUG util.py:378: http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/20/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/moceap/Ojuba/build/104585/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: COPR fail to build on F20
It fails just since 2 days ago .. not related to EOL .. > Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 04:11:42 +0200 > Subject: Re: COPR fail to build on F20 > From: timotheus.poko...@solidcharity.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > > DEBUG util.py:378: failure: repodata/repomd.xml from updates: [Errno 256] > > No more mirrors to try. > > DEBUG util.py:378: > > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/20/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: > > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found > F20 has reached end of life: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life > > Please target F22 instead. > > Timotheus > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: COPR fail to build on F20
Why COPR still allow that .. !!! If COPR wants to keep F20 , it must use new repo URLs .. and fix this issue or remove it from available options .. > Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:00:10 +0200 > From: mschwe...@gmail.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: COPR fail to build on F20 > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 14:44:03 +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > > It fails just since 2 days ago .. not related to EOL .. > > How do you know it's not related to EOL? > How can you tell it's not related to deleting the repos from > the servers? Perhaps that has been done just recently? > -> http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/20/README > > > > > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/20/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: > > > > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found > > > F20 has reached end of life: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: COPR fail to build on F20
No contact info or bug tracker ! > Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 18:58:40 +0200 > From: mschwe...@gmail.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: COPR fail to build on F20 > > On Sat, 18 Jul 2015 15:42:59 +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > > Why COPR still allow that .. !!! If COPR wants to keep F20 , it must use > > new repo URLs .. and fix this issue or remove it from available options .. > > > > It may be necessary to inform the Copr admins: > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/ > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: COPR fail to build on F20
Where is COPR ?? Can't find anymore > Subject: Re: COPR fail to build on F20 > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > From: msu...@redhat.com > Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:29:22 +0200 > > Dne 18.7.2015 v 04:11 Timotheus Pokorra napsal(a): > >> DEBUG util.py:378: failure: repodata/repomd.xml from updates: [Errno 256] > >> > No more mirrors to try. > >> > DEBUG util.py:378: > >> > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/20/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: > >> > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found > > F20 has reached end of life: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life > > > > Please target F22 instead. > > We removed F20 target from Copr today. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: COPR fail to build on F20
It's in Update progress ... hope to finish soon . From: moc...@hotmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: RE: COPR fail to build on F20 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:25:58 +0200 Where is COPR ?? Can't find anymore > Subject: Re: COPR fail to build on F20 > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > From: msu...@redhat.com > Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 16:29:22 +0200 > > Dne 18.7.2015 v 04:11 Timotheus Pokorra napsal(a): > >> DEBUG util.py:378: failure: repodata/repomd.xml from updates: [Errno 256] > >> > No more mirrors to try. > >> > DEBUG util.py:378: > >> > http://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/20/i386/repodata/repomd.xml: > >> > [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found > > F20 has reached end of life: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/End_of_life > > > > Please target F22 instead. > > We removed F20 target from Copr today. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCA > Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: COPR fail to build on F20
Big Thanx Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 03:46:53 -0600 From: ke...@scrye.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: COPR fail to build on F20 On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 02:42:05 -0600 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 10:25:58 +0200 > مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > > Where is COPR ?? Can't find anymore > > It's unfortunately down still from the planned outage last night. ;( > > It's being worked on, and we will bring it back up as soon as we are > able. > > Sorry for the trouble. The fedora infrastructure private cloud (and thus copr) is back up and processing now. Many thanks to the heroic efforts from Patrick Uiterwijk, along with openstack neutron maintainers who brought things back up. kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Some Big Data packages in need of co-maintainers
Approved. Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 23:14:10 +0530 Subject: Re: Some Big Data packages in need of co-maintainers From: cools...@gmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org CC: bigd...@lists.fedoraproject.org; java-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi Peter, I am co-maintaining hadoop and some other packages, I can co-maintain ambari, hive, pig I have requested for access rights. Please approve. Thanks!Best Regards, Swapnil Kulkarni irc : coolsvap coolsvap at gmail dot com On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Peter MacKinnon wrote: Hello, I own some packages that have been neglected due to my work on other projects. It would be great to have some co-maintainers to keep these in good health in Fedora. All are reasonably up-to-date but as the hadoop package revs (a key dependency), I fear breakdowns in the not too distant future. ambari datanucleus-* hive javolution jdo-api jspc pig Let me know if you're interested. Thanks! \Pete -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Copr too slow !!!
Results: No results yet Built packages: - Chroots: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 : pending fedora-rawhide-i386 : pending fedora-20-x86_64 : pending fedora-20-i386 : pending epel-7-x86_64 : pending fedora-21-x86_64 : pending fedora-21-i386 : pending fedora-22-x86_64 : pending fedora-22-i386 : pending Submitted: 2015-03-30 00:27 AST (2 hours ago) Started: Not yet Finished: Not yet Build time: - Networking enabled: True -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Copr too slow !!!
Thank You https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/4699 Mosaab Date: Sun, 29 Mar 2015 18:13:12 -0600 From: ke...@scrye.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Copr too slow !!! On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 01:37:23 +0200 مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > Results: > > No results yet > > > Built packages: ...snip... 1. So, the proper place to report issues with an infrastructure service is by filing a ticket here: https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/newticket Or you can let us know on IRC in #fedora-admin. 2. I am taking a look at the problem and hopefully it will be processing again soon. 3. We are working on moving things to a new cloud install that should be a good deal more reliable. Thanks, kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
FAILED: BuildError: package netbeans is blocked for tag f23
What's problem ? what's solve ? Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: FAILED: BuildError: package netbeans is blocked for tag f23
Every help is welcomed .. Co-maintainers requested of this important package . Can you give me links ? of your works. Mosaab > Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 12:07:06 +0200 > From: juj...@jujens.eu > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: FAILED: BuildError: package netbeans is blocked for tag f23 > > On 04/16/2015 11:12 AM, Mat Booth wrote: > > On 15 April 2015 at 16:29, مصعب الزعبي > <mailto:moc...@hotmail.com>> wrote: > > > > What's problem ? what's solve ? > > > > Mosaab > > > > > > -- > > devel mailing list > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org <mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > > > > > Package was retired due to lack of maintainership. > > > > No one from Java SIG was interested in keeping it alive any longer -- it > > was only here to support VisualVM, IIRC, but that is also now retired. > > > > -- > > Mat Booth > > http://fedoraproject.org/get-fedora > > > > > Hi, > > Which version of Netbeans are you trying to build? I am also trying to > build Netbeans and Netbeans-platform (version 8.0.2) on fedora 21 and I > have not succeed yet but I made some progress. Maybe I can help you. > > Regard, > Julien Enselme > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ROLLING FEDORA
Hi List, Any plans for rolling Fedora ?? Regards Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: ROLLING FEDORA
How we build a rolling Iso script .. don't effect by Fedora or Anaconda release ?? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: ROLLING FEDORA
There is a problem >> Packages of rawhide not all stable !!! we need a non-limited repo with only stable packages . Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Realted to "Fedora Release Engineering" is this OK?!!
Hi every one ,
This commit add number after %{?dist} .. is this OK !!
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/gnulib.git/commit/?id=c2f0d77aba7a2b745886654c42c943f6a9c1a4b7
See full package name
http://fr2.rpmfind.net//linux/RPM/fedora/devel/rawhide/src/g/gnulib-0-8.20140504git.fc21.1.src.html
Regards
Mosaab
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Millions of APKs.
Hi all. As you know there are millions of Android applications , there is a lot of emulators , but is time to run them native came ?? I saw this uncompleted project for (Android runtime) : https://github.com/icedrobot Regards Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Gharef - Easy GitHub Archives Downloader
Gharef Git Hub Archive Ready Employ Fedora
Fedora has rules for packaging projects that hosted
on GitHub.
Downloading and placing in the right position takes
time from developers so Gharef doing that so simply.
Usage of Gharef very easy, Just type:
gharef {owner} {project} {commit}
This is first try .. you can try and contribute at :
https://github.com/ojuba-org/gharef
-=-=-=-=-=-Mosaab AlzoubiSenior of Linux Arab Community
http://linuxac.orgMember of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.orgMember of Arab Eyes
project http://arabeyes.orgMaintainer of Almasa project
http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.htmlMember of
Fedora packaging teamMaintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - KDE - VLC -
MATE etcAlso member of Fedora Arabic translations team
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Introducing of Mosaab Alzoubi
Hi , For instructions here : https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers I am glad to Introduce myself to you , My name Mosaab Alzoubi , 24 years old. I hope to make opensource public in my Arabic world . So I worked and still working hard to doing that . I use fedora since fedora 9 , and I use linux since mandrake 9 . Before some months I joined to Arabic fedora translation team . My FAS : moceap -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - MATE etc Also member of Fedora and KDE Arabic translations team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Introducing of Mosaab Alzoubi
> Subject: Re: Introducing of Mosaab Alzoubi > From: jdie...@lesbg.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2013 08:20:13 +0300 > > > On Wed, 2013-10-02 at 12:53 +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > Hi , > > > > For instructions here : > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers > > I am glad to Introduce myself to you , > > > > My name Mosaab Alzoubi , 24 years old. > > > Ahlan wa-sahlan. If you're ever in Lebanon, look me up. > > Jonathan > > > > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct I'm Syrian and never visited Lebanon . I planned to that some years ago , but some problems happened . -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - MATE etc Also member of Fedora and KDE Arabic translations team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Lack of response about sponsorship
LOL ^_^ I have 7 review requests , 5 of them ready , but no sponsors !!! Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 20:19:11 -0700 From: l...@fedoraproject.org To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Lack of response about sponsorship Hello developers and packagers, I recently received an email from the reporter[1] from rhbz #913289. related to the sponsorship. The review was done. One of sponsors promised to take care of that step which never came to fruition. It has been more than two months the original reporter asked if there is a sponsored packager willing to take over the package. Considering the reporter is also a entrepreneur who took the time to port some of upstream packages to Fedora, I am utterly disappointed by the lack of communication from the sponsors for a simple task. The fact the reporter vainly tried to ask for sponsorship leaves a negative impression as if the communication are uninterested to bring more contributors outside Fedora. The way to get sponsored seemed harder because not everybody has the luxury to wait on IRC channel[2]. New contributors have tendency to use mail list so better clarifications are needed. I understand each one of us is busy with their life but a simple message would suffice to let know about the status. Is there a better way to address this concern to avoid repeating it in the future? Ref: [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-August/187357.html [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- Luya Tshimbalanga Graphic & Web Designer E: l...@fedoraproject.org W: http://www.coolest-storm.net -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one
بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, I try to build arched subpackage from main (noarch) package. I can't and have this message : error: line 153: Only noarch subpackages are supported: BuildArch: noarch noarch Any ideas ?? Regards Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one
Ok, I read that message, but I search for a tweak. So I'll separate main package into (-core) nonarched, and meta one arched. Regards == Mosaab > Subject: Re: Drive arched subpackage from nonarched one > From: boche...@fedoraproject.org > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:13:09 +0800 > > On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 09:05 +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > <بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم > > > > Hi, > > > > I try to build arched subpackage from main (noarch) package. I can't and > > have this message : > > > > error: line 153: Only noarch subpackages are supported: BuildArch: noarch > > noarch > > Any ideas ?? > > The message is clear: you can't do that. > > A subpackage must be either the same arch as the base package, or > noarch. > > > -- > Mathieu > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Packages have "proxy" word.
بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) , error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. In my country Syria (maybe others) all URLs have "proxy" word are forbidden and couldn't open by default way. In Fedora there are two common packages and have many updates: libproxy - sssd-proxy . Can to rename to : libproxies - sssd-proxies Or something else. Then do new rule to write "proxies" instead of proxy, at Fedora packaging guidlines. Regards -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - KDE etc Also member of Fedora Arabic translations team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Proxies not banned. Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 00:20:35 +0100 Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. From: mkkp...@gmail.com To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Hi, Renaming packages it is not user friendly thing because of few reasons: - there's some documentation/blog posts etc that use these names - this will break installation scripts - poeple who use these packages are familiar with these names What if your country also ban "proxies" word? 2013/11/1 مصعب الزعبي بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Hi, The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) , error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. In my country Syria (maybe others) all URLs have "proxy" word are forbidden and couldn't open by default way. In Fedora there are two common packages and have many updates: libproxy - sssd-proxy . Can to rename to : libproxies - sssd-proxies Or something else. Then do new rule to write "proxies" instead of proxy, at Fedora packaging guidlines. Regards -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - KDE etc Also member of Fedora Arabic translations team -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- Best regards, Michal http://eventhorizon.pl/ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
About me And also professional users, doing some thing to download these packages. What about normal users !! what about the beginners ?? > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:07:22 +0100 > From: zbys...@in.waw.pl > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:08:33AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم > > > > Hi, > > > > The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! > > > > When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) , error > > message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. > > > > In my country Syria (maybe others) all URLs have "proxy" word are forbidden > > and couldn't open by default way. > > I think you'll have to use a... proxy to work around this problem. > Or maybe it'll be enough to use a https connection to the mirror. > > > Zbyszek > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Not worked during updating !
Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:42:35 -0600
Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word.
From: li...@petetravis.com
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Oct 31, 2013 6:08 PM, "مصعب الزعبي" wrote:
>
> بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم
>
> Hi,
>
> The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !!
>
> When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) , error
> message will appear with http 403 error forbidden.
>
> In my country Syria (maybe others) all URLs have "proxy" word are forbidden
> and couldn't open by default way.
>
> In Fedora there are two common packages and have many updates:
>
> libproxy - sssd-proxy .
>
> Can to rename to :
>
> libproxies - sssd-proxies
>
> Or something else.
>
> Then do new rule to write "proxies" instead of proxy, at Fedora packaging
> guidlines.
>
>
>
> Regards
>
>
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-
> Mosaab Alzoubi
>
You might have some luck with rsync. I *think* there's some tooling out there
to enable a mirror with only your required packages; if not, you can create a
wrapper script for it. Something like --excludes=$("yum list all" - "yum list
installed") might do. [not actual code]
--Pete
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Also for old names we can use (provides:) function. I can turn around the problem but beginners can't. > From: cicku...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 10:42:16 +0800 > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Censorship? I think we have no reason to change the package name > because of some governments‘ being evil. > > Have you tried opening a ssh tunnel proxy for firewall breaking? > > Thanks. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Great idea to hash package names. Thanx > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:02:24 +0100 > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > From: drag...@gmail.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 3:42 AM, Christopher Meng wrote: > > Censorship? I think we have no reason to change the package name > > because of some governments‘ being evil. > > Well there are different ways to solve it then to rename the package. > Having the user use a vpn, ssh tunnel or a proxy is one thing but > requires user action. Another solution would be to have redirects on > the mirrors based on lets say the hash value of the package name ... I > doubt any country would censor a string like > "d799bae6088a90139b415fccb011d540531df83b" (sha1 of "proxy") ... the > question is whether this is worth the effort or not. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Ok , so what about last idea to hash package names ? > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:44:57 +0100 > From: msu...@redhat.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > > On 11/01/2013 12:38 AM, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > Proxies not banned. > > But can be. > > Renaming packages are non-trivial packages which can take full several days > of work. > > And if your goverment decide to add 'proxies' to list (which is 5 second > work) all this work will be vanished. > > -- > Miroslav Suchy, RHCE, RHCDS > Red Hat, Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Fedora is a global community, not company, published under free license for fredom of computers. Fedora has many many mirrors around the world, nobody can ban it to reach anywhere. Also this law is under restudy, Due to War in Syria. Source forge and many websites that banned them-contents for Syrian IPs, now these contents are allowed and open for Syria, also Youtube before 3 years we need proxies to reach it, Now It's open. I can't show Fedora out of Freedom under any name, or any stuation. Regards -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - KDE - MATE etc Also member of Fedora Arabic translations team > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 13:52:31 +0100 > From: zbys...@in.waw.pl > To: berra...@redhat.com; devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:09:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:07:22AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:08:33AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > > > بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! > > > > > > > > When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) , > > > > error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. > > > > > > > > In my country Syria (maybe others) all URLs have "proxy" word are > > > > forbidden and couldn't open by default way. > > > > > > I think you'll have to use a... proxy to work around this problem. > > > Or maybe it'll be enough to use a https connection to the mirror. > > > > NB, US export restrictions that Fedora is subject to mean users > > from Syria should not be downloading Fedora at all[1], via a proxy > > or not. > Let's consider how likely this export restriction is to prevent a > member of the Syrian government or military from obtaining a copy of > Fedora? Not very likely. How likely this export restriction is to hurt > a random person, e.g. trying to install open source to avoid > restrictions imposed by their government? The first is a joke, the > second is high enough to keep this restriction in the same contempt > as the Syrian government's ban on "proxy". > > Zbyszek > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word. (repeated to CC legal)
Fedora is a global community, not company, published under free license for fredom of computers. Fedora has many many mirrors around the world, nobody can ban it to reach anywhere. Also this law is under restudy, Due to War in Syria. Source forge and many websites that banned them-contents for Syrian IPs, now these contents are allowed and open for Syria, also Youtube before 3 years we need proxies to reach it, Now It's open. I can't show Fedora out of Freedom under any name, or any stuation. Regards -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - KDE - MATE etc Also member of Fedora Arabic translations team > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org; zbys...@in.waw.pl > From: sochotni...@redhat.com > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 14:54:15 +0100 > CC: le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Quoting Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (2013-11-01 13:52:31) > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 12:09:03PM +, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 02:07:22AM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 01:08:33AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > > > > بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم > > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > The result of updating Fedora by yum is fail !! > > > > > > > > > > When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) , > > > > > error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. > > > > > > > > > > In my country Syria (maybe others) all URLs have "proxy" word are > > > > > forbidden and couldn't open by default way. > > > > > > > > I think you'll have to use a... proxy to work around this problem. > > > > Or maybe it'll be enough to use a https connection to the mirror. > > > > > > NB, US export restrictions that Fedora is subject to mean users > > > from Syria should not be downloading Fedora at all[1], via a proxy > > > or not. > > Let's consider how likely this export restriction is to prevent a > > member of the Syrian government or military from obtaining a copy of > > Fedora? Not very likely. How likely this export restriction is to hurt > > a random person, e.g. trying to install open source to avoid > > restrictions imposed by their government? The first is a joke, the > > second is high enough to keep this restriction in the same contempt > > as the Syrian government's ban on "proxy". > > You are walking on thin ice and should stop immediately > > "You may not provide Fedora software or technical information to individuals > or > entities located in one of these countries or otherwise subject to these > restrictions." > > CCing fedora-legal for good measure > > -- > Stanislav Ochotnicky > Software Engineer - Developer Experience > > PGP: 7B087241 > Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Thank You for attention, Yes they are all downloadable, But only if I use https. > From: f...@deneb.enyo.de > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 20:00:54 +0100 > > * مصعب الزعبي: > > > When any package have "proxy" word marked to (install or update) , > > error message will appear with http 403 error forbidden. > > A curious problem. Could you use the repositories on > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/ instead? > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
Yes HTTPS works, I think add https://dl.fedoraproject.org to mirrorlist will solve this problem. -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - KDE - MATE etc Also member of Fedora Arabic translations team > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 11:57:26 -0500 > From: sand...@redhat.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Packages have "proxy" word. > > On 11/2/13 11:48 AM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote: >> On 11/02/2013 12:46 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >>> On 11/2/13 10:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>>> مصعب الزعبي wrote: >>>>> Then do new rule to write "proxies" instead of proxy, at Fedora packaging >>>>> guidlines. >>>> >>>> Renaming packages, censoring descriptions etc. in Fedora at the whims of >>>> governments (of countries Fedora isn't supposed to be exported to in the >>>> first place) is not going to happen. Sorry. >>>> >>>> Kevin Kofler >>>> >>> >>> I think your answer conflates two issues. >>> >>> If Syria is on the export control list, there's really no further discussion >>> to be had. >>> >>> But I wonder how many i.e. school nanny-filters ban URLs with the word >>> "proxy," and how that impacts the ability of users in any country to obtain >>> Fedora. >>> >>> The idea of an alternate URL using package hashes seemed reasonable to me, >>> to route around that sort of internet damage. >>> >>> -Eric >>> >> >> I think the solution in this case, that would require zero change to >> package names, and likely little else, would be to offer a way to choose >> only those repos that offer an https interface. > > If that works, sure. (I didn't read the whole thread, didn't realize that > it solved the problem.) > > -Eric > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Packages have "proxy" word.
First , I ask very important questions: Is Fedora a global community or not ?? Is Fedora working for Freedom or not ?? I need answers, truly. Fedora is a global community, not company, published under free license for fredom of computers. Fedora has many many mirrors around the world, nobody can ban it to reach anywhere. Also this law is under restudy, Due to War in Syria. Source forge and many websites that banned them-contents for Syrian IPs, now these contents are allowed and open for Syria, also Youtube before 3 years we need proxies to reach it, Now It's open. > Wasn't Syria actually READDED to the list of banned countries due to the > civil war? This US racial law only for old goverment , there are more than one goverment in Syria now. I can't show Fedora out of Freedom under any name, or any stuation. Regards -=-=-=-=-=- Mosaab Alzoubi Senior of Linux Arab Community http://linuxac.org Member of Ojuba Project http://ojuba.org Member of Arab Eyes project http://arabeyes.org Maintainer of Almasa project http://linux.softpedia.com/progMoreBy/Publisher-Almasa-47122.html Maintainer of Arabic Translations in : Wine - VLC - KDE - MATE etc Also member of Fedora Arabic translations team > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > From: kevin.kof...@chello.at > Subject: RE: Packages have "proxy" word. > Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2013 16:54:27 +0100 > > مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > > Also this law is under restudy, Due to War in Syria. > > Wasn't Syria actually READDED to the list of banned countries due to the > civil war? > > Kevin Kofler > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
NetBeans Re-Enable
Hi all Netbeans disabled on F16 due to lack of maintainers. I asked to take it on PkgDB No answer .. Regards Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: NetBeans Re-Enable
I'll try
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6071
thank you
Mosaab
Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 20:38:22 +0100
From: punto...@libero.it
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: NetBeans Re-Enable
Il 29/12/2014 19:56, Itamar Reis
Peixoto ha scritto:
On Mon, Dec 29, 2014 at 4:36 PM, مصعب
الزعبي
wrote:
Hi all
Netbeans disabled on F16 due to lack of maintainers.
I asked to take it on PkgDB No answer ..
Regards
Mosaab
I think you probably needs to file a new review request
--
Itamar Reis Peixoto
When the package is approved, you need to open an "rel-eng request":
e.g. https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6033
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: nonresponsive maintainer - Axel Thimm
Also I can help in some packages. Access Asked fakechroot,fakeroot,freenx-server,greylistd,synaptic,fedora-package-config-apt,apt Mosaab > From: fdc-li...@fcami.net > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 10:24:04 +0100 > Subject: Re: nonresponsive maintainer - Axel Thimm > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > CC: axel.th...@atrpms.net > > On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > I'm continuing the nonresponsive maintainer process for Axel Thimm > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186467 > > +1 > > > I've been effectively maintaining a number of Axel's packages for years now. > > Time to get them properly owned. > > Does anyone know how to contact Axel? > > I can help maintain vtk/vtkdata/fail2ban and possibly others if needed. > > François > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages
Alot taked ... Mosaab > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 17:19:38 +0800 > Subject: Orphaning and seeking comaintainers of some packages > From: cicku...@gmail.com > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Hi, > > There are some packages I don't use anymore, feel free to take them: > > libntlm > python-durus > barry > spambayes > rblcheck > tokyocabinet > jaxodraw > flterm > libquvi > libquvi-scripts > quvi > python-django-socialregistration > dayplanner > gengetopt > code2html > elementary-icon-theme > drehatlas-widelands-fonts > pycryptopp > drehatlas-xaporho-fonts > qdevelop > kawa > perl-BDB > txt2rss > scanssh > mimetex > perl-Date-HolidayParser > perl-Email-Find > python-pymtp(epel7) > > These below are packages I seldom use, feel free to comaintain them: > > NetPIPE > PyMca > roxterm > autoconf-archive > freetalk > unhide > firehol > npth > exaile > flickcurl > jwm > elektra > dmenu > profile-sync-daemon > python-eyed3 > oyranos > > Thanks. > -- > > Yours sincerely, > Christopher Meng > > http://cicku.me > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!
Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer. And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!! He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates enabled and controlled by NetworkManager , domains are : vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org proxy3.fedoraproject.org And both directed to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#FedoraApps I check my ( lsof -i :443 ) and didn't detect any connection .. - Can any body explain ... Regards Mosaab -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!
No it's a real problem .. What the information by 443 port that shared by NetworkManager !!! to un-local servers . THIS IS THE DEFINITION OF BACKDOOR !!! Regards Mosaab Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 21:48:57 +0100 From: h.rei...@thelounge.net To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Subject: Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?! Am 22.02.2015 um 21:41 schrieb مصعب الزعبي: > Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer. > > And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!! > > He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates > enabled and controlled by NetworkManager , domains are : > vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org > proxy3.fedoraproject.org > > And both directed to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#FedoraApps > > > I check my (||lsof -i :443 ) ||and didn't detect any connection .. > - > > Can any body explain ... "He got a two domains without any control of him" makes no sense -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!
Thank You for Care .. from everybody for this case .. I know that talking about Fedora as a backdoor container makes us angry .. But we must be careful about these sensitive issues. As a reply : My friend didn't have enabled auto-update. He completely Surprised of un-human-authorized connection by fedora. He disabled these actions by : sudo echo 127.0.0.1 vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org proxy3.fedoraproject.org apps.fedoraproject.org 6-55-236-85.rev.customer-net.de >> /etc/hosts As a Fedora Developers .. We must be Transparents Kind Regards Mosaab > From: f...@deneb.enyo.de > To: moc...@hotmail.com > CC: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?! > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 22:11:23 +0100 > > * مصعب الزعبي: > > > Hi , I got a message from my friend a programmer. > > > > And he asked me , Is Fedora have a backdoor !!! > > > > He got a two domains without any control of him and without updates enabled > > and controlled by NetworkManager , domains are : > > > > vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org > > > > proxy3.fedoraproject.org > > > > And both directed to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/#FedoraApps > > Hi Mosaab, > > Fedora uses a mirror list service. This service tells the Fedora > updater where it can download updates. Please tell your friend that > this is completely normal. In fact, it is required to keep his Fedora > installation up to date and secure. > > Florian > > PS: Please do not start a new discussion by replying to an existing > message. Please write your question as an email message from scratch. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
RE: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?!
Even it just a Meta headers , the user approve must be taken. May at Fedora installation , and a way to stop must be available , too. These issues must be in control by user . Kind Regards Mosaab > Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 17:44:59 -0500 > From: mat...@fedoraproject.org > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Subject: Re: Is Fedora Have Backdoor ?! > > On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 12:37:44AM +0200, مصعب الزعبي wrote: > > My friend didn't have enabled auto-update. > > There was an earlier discussion here. Even without updates > automatically applied, metadata about potential updates is downloaded > automatically. > > > > He completely Surprised of un-human-authorized connection by fedora. > > Preventing automatic system network interactions is not explicitly a > project goal, and we don't have any strong guidelines on this. If you > think it _should_ be, you wouldn't be alone — but on the other hand, > there are strong user benefits in making sure the system is up to date, > there's no waiting for metadata downloads, network connectivity is correct, > and so on; so, you'll need to build a strong case that this concern is > the most important. > > > He disabled these actions by : > > sudo echo 127.0.0.1 vm3.fedora.ibiblio.org proxy3.fedoraproject.org > > apps.fedoraproject.org 6-55-236-85.rev.customer-net.de >> /etc/hosts > > Since these connections really are innocuous, this seems more likely to > do harm than good, but of course your friend can do this if wanted. > > > -- > Matthew Miller > > Fedora Project Leader > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
رد: Non-responsive maintainer Mosaab Alzoubi
Replied on https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2212 من: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel تم الإرسال: 20/ذو الحجة/1440 11:27 ص إلى: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org نسخة: Vitaly Zaitsev الموضوع: Non-responsive maintainer Mosaab Alzoubi Hello all. According to non-responsive maintainer procedure for moceap, I'm asking here if anyone know how to reach out for the maintainer. RHBZ ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740611 RHBZ ticket with countdown: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733802 -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
رد: plocate?
It looks good to maintain. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1931141 Mosaab من: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek تم الإرسال: 08/رجب/1442 05:06 م إلى: Development discussions related to Fedora الموضوع: plocate? Debian is apparently switching to plocate as the the default locate/mlocate provider [0], a bit faster and more disk-efficient. Would it make sense to do the same in Fedora? I prepared a package [1, 2]. The code seems nice and clean enough. I'd be happy to take it through review, but I'm not particular keen on long-term maintenance… [0] https://lwn.net/Articles/846405/ [1] http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/plocate.spec [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/zbyszek/plocate Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Fresh-built Fedora CANT boot !
Hi all Three days ago , I can build Fedora ISO and it's ran without problems. Today I build it successfully but can't boot !! http://207.244.97.131/%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B7%D8%A9%20%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%A9%20%D9%85%D9%86%202017-02-27%2001-52-02.png [http://207.244.97.131/%D9%84%D9%82%D8%B7%D8%A9%20%D8%B4%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%A9%20%D9%85%D9%86%202017-02-27%2001-52-02.png] ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Enable Android Kernel Modules
Anbox is a productive thing like Wine. So I suggest that we care more about it. To run Anbox we need to enable 2 modules in Kernel. They are: ahmem_linux binder_linux So I hope to enable them ASAP. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1455411 Mosaab Alzoubi ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Two Years of Fedora Releases
Dear Fedora development community, As you know Fedora releases every 6 months for one year of lifetime. This is good for development and new features implementation. But it is not good for stability and sustainability. When upgrading the system every 6 months, alot of resources will be trashed!! For Fedora users and Fedora itself. It will be more stable, effective, natural-friendly and feasible if we make Fedora lifetime as: - One year between releases. - Two year of release lifetime. Kind Regards, MOSAAB ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
