Re: Abotu setting 'PermitRootLogin=no' in sshd_config
On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 12:41 PM, P J P pj.pan...@yahoo.co.in wrote: Hello, Sshd(8) daemon by default allows remote users to login as root. 1. Is that really necessary? 2. Lot of users use their systems as root, without even creating a non-root user. Such practices need to be discouraged, not allowing remote root login could be useful in that. Does it make sense to disable remote root login by default? If so, do we need to just report it to the maintainer or it would be treated as a feature? Being a Fedora user on my personal machine as well as maintainer of a few Fedora machines in production environment, I would gladly welcome this. Many people do disable root login anyway. Having it default would be a positive step from security stand point. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Re: Need some packages to be reviewed.
Hey Volker, I'll go through your package over the weekend and review it. I hope that would be fine. -- Aditya Patawari http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania India On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Volker Fröhlich volke...@gmx.at wrote: Am Mittwoch, 23. Mai 2012, 16:19:22 schrieb Aditya Patawari: Hey, I am looking for some kind people to review the following packages: Carbon: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824348 graphite-web: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824357 whisper: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824361 I'd trade whisper for: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812559 Volker Fröhlich -- Aditya Patawari http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania India -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Need some packages to be reviewed.
Hey, I am looking for some kind people to review the following packages: Carbon: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824348 graphite-web: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824357 whisper: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824361 -- Aditya Patawari http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania India -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: How to find out download URL for a given package through code ?
On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Kushal Das kushal...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, I am trying to find the best suitable way to get download URL for any given package ? Say, someone wants to find out download URL for libreoffice-calc-3.3.3.1-1.fc15.x86_64 . The user may not be on a Fedora 15 box. I saw yumdownloader --urls option. Any pointers ? If the rpm is installed, then you can use rpm -qi package name. Don't know if you are looking for this or not though. Aditya Patawari http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania India -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Anaconda memory requirements
Use the installer that is available on a Live spin, instead of using anaconda. Arun, lets use live installer. Anaconda won't help in schools. Live, anyway, has its advantages and kids/teachers can check it out before installation. -- Aditya Patawari http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ India -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Re: Starting Java SIG
Hi, I would love to join and contribute to any such SIG. I am a package maintainer but I am not maintaining any Java package as of now. It would be nice if we can help out newbies as well as other maintainers like me to package and maybe develop java apps. -- Aditya Patawari http://yaps.co.in http://blog.adityapatawari.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adimania India On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com wrote: Hi everyone, There has been an effort few years back to start Java SIG but it didn't work out in the end (no idea why). I decided it's time to try again :-) I would like to start Java SIG for a lot of reasons. Some of them: * Packaging guidelines are in need of an update (badly) * Consistency in java packages is somewhat lacking * More eyes see more approach, I'd like for all java related commits to go through an alias so we can all watch out for changes that can break our stuff * Have a place where we can collect tips tricks, solutions to common problems etc. Currently this information is scattered through people's wiki pages * Java needs collaboration more than most other areas, because problems cannot be safely discovered automatically when someone changes dependency. This can cause serious headaches (to me at least). Java SIG to the rescue! :-) * Other languages have their own SIGs and we don't! :-) Who am I? Owner/Co-maintainer of a bunch of Java packages (mostly maven plugins, apache-commons, junit, velocity, checkstyle, plexus libraries). Involved in recent update of maven to v2.2.1. Reply if you're interested with helping out and being able to see/influence where Java packaging in Fedora is going. I know there will be at least a few people joining in. I'll be starting Java SIG wiki page soon, plus I guess we can peruse java-devel mailing list for SIG discussions. -- Stanislav Ochotnicky sochotni...@redhat.com Associate Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno PGP: 71A1677C Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
