Re: how to explicitly disable rawhide while building a spin/remix
install the fedora-kickstarts rpm edit the fedora-repo.ks to use fedora-repo-not-rawhide.ks ksflatten your kickstart and it will use the normal fedora repos (when all else fails talk to the Fedora Respin SiG in #fedora-respins) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: getting kernel-devel added
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2017 16:35:50 + From: "Klosowski, Przemek (Fed)"<przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> Subject: Re: getting kernel-devel added To:"devel@lists.fedoraproject.org" <devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> Message-ID:<1d935df8-f710-94a2-cda0-afa670dee...@nist.gov> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1d935df8f71094a2cda0afa670dee62cnistgov_" --_000_1d935df8f71094a2cda0afa670dee62cnistgov_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/12/2017 11:35 AM, Ben Williams wrote: They used the F26 release so now have the release kernel and so they instal= l sudo dnf install kernel-devel and still have issues (kernel and kernel-de= vel versions do not match). You're saying that they need to reboot, because kernel-devel update forces = the new kernel but they still run on the old kernel? that's going to bite = them repeatedly every time kernel updates, if the virtual tools bypass the = system packaging. It needs to be solved by virtual tools integration, or by= more explicit warnings on kernel updates. no not what i said and the reboots are not the issue once kernel-devel is on the system with the correct kernel any future updates both will be updated. the issue is kernel-devel is not installed ootb with any of our DEs and i am giving the issue to you from the enduser prespective install the f26 release iso from get fedora do a rpm -qa |grep kernel kernel-devel is needed by lots of our endusers I produce the updated isos i have added kernel-devel to my ks but it would be a better exiperence going forward for the new enduser if kernel-devel was included by default in the woekstation and spins Ben ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
getting kernel-devel added
hello This is an issue i am seeing with new users: I was at a University installfest this weekend and this was the major issues for Endusers. case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this case) for a class. they are required for said class to install the guest additions. they are constantly running into errors that the guest addidions will not build (there install does not have kernel-devel install. They used the F26 release so now have the release kernel and so they install sudo dnf install kernel-devel and still have issues (kernel and kernel-devel versions do not match). Case B) third party video or wireless driver same issue no kernel-devel, no wireless no internet == fix by sneakernet Both of these issues can be easily fixed by including kernel-devel in a group or by adding kernel-devel to all the Desktop Environment kickstarts. To me this simple fix will help our new users and will not leave such a unfriendly feeling (and hopeful increase our contributor base down the road) Ben ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: devel Digest, Vol 153, Issue 91
I will give it a try I am sure i will be making a new batch of updated F24 lives later this week -- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 12:35:37 -0500 From: Neal GompaSubject: Re: Announcement: Python 3 port of livecd-creator (was: Re: Announcement: DNF port of livecd-creator) To: Development discussions related to Fedora Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 12:17 PM, John Florian wrote: On Sun, 2016-11-13 at 05:03 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: Hi, FYI, Neal Gompa has now put up a Copr with the DNF + Python 3 version of the livecd-tools: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/ngompa/livecd-creator/ This is interesting news for me. I'm a long time user (in an employed capacity) of livecd-tools and it sort of felt like the project was circling the drain. I've recently started playing with livemedia-creator and have found some aspects that look wonderfully powerful (e.g., the lorax templates) but have also found it frustrating to use when it doesn't like my kickstart. I'm past that frustration (for now), but have hit another bump. To make the spins from lm-c into what I need, I must modify the lorax templates and since our spins are done in our Koji there doesn't yet appear to be anyway to achieve that. In order to use alternative templates, the livemedia-creator command must have an additional parameter passed. Koji currently doesn't support this facility, which makes it difficult to use when you need to support custom layouts. If you'd like this capability, file a bug against koji in bugzilla for it. So I'm at a crossroad of enhancing Koji to support custom lorax templates or to maybe hold out for this breath of life in livecd-tools. Are you planning to get this work into the livecd-tools in the standard Fedora repos? What about Koji support? Would this work as is or will that require further work? Kevin has already submitted a request to merge our work into the canonical livecd-tools repository[1]. Once merged, we hope that upstream will push a new release to supported releases with the new code. The work we did shouldn't affect Koji support any, though if you run Koji on something other than Fedora, you'll need to have the latest DNF 1.1 version available on the system running Koji. With the release of RHEL 7.3 and EPEL7 subsequently bumping up to it, the version of DNF for EL7 can be bumped to the latest 1.1 release. Please request that in bugzilla, if you want it. I'm currently not providing EL7 packages because of the lack of DNF 1.1. With no CentOS 7.3 available yet, I cannot produce packages that would be installable by the vast majority of people. [1]: https://github.com/rhinstaller/livecd-tools/pull/37 I'm just trying to gauge where to focus my efforts project-wise. Hopefully I can contribute something here. I would encourage you to try out our new livecd-tools and see how it performs for your needs. Contributions are welcome as well. If upstream doesn't pull it in, the code will be maintained on Kevin's GitHub repository[2]. [2]: https://github.com/kkofler/livecd-tools ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora.NEXT Products and the fate of Spins
May take on the Spins 1) Spins have given us a great way to show people what is in Fedora without installing 2) We have been producing Multi-Live media for several years to give out at events. 3) The multi-lives make the display machines very easy to maintain (new release wipe hd and reinstall multi-live ) 4) I personally produce updated Live isos for the community. We have seen that they do and have many times solved issues that people had installing on the original release. 5) yes Spins create a overhead as far as testing etc. but in the end run they are the best way to get a enduser to experiment to see if they like running Fedora. 6) now do i think we need spins for any group other than Workstation no -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
Fedora 12 re-spins Released
The Fedora Unity Project is proud to announce the release of new ISO Re-Spins of Fedora 12. These Re-Spin ISOs are based on the officially released Fedora 12 installation media and include all updates released as of February 2nd, 2010. The ISO images are available for i386, x86_64, architectures via Jigdo or Torrent starting Wednesday February 10th, 2010 (saving about 437MB of updates for a default install). Go to http://spins.fedoraunity.org/spins to get the bits! We are glad to be able to announce the current Fedora 12 Re-Spin, 20100202, despite problems in this Re-Spin. Nonetheless, we, Fedora Unity, have decided to release this Re-Spin with the following side-note: Due to a newly discovered bug the re-spins do not include all the SCSI drivers (BUSLOGIC as an example which is used by VMware) *** We would like to give a special thanks to the following for testing this Re-Spin: - vwbusguy- Scott Williams - Southern_Gentleman Ben Williams - kanarip Jeroen van Meeuwen - fenrus2 Dennis Johnson - BobLfootBob Lightfoot - adm1Davis Leggett Fedora Unity Re-Spin 20100202 Changelog ( http://spins.fedoraunity.org/changelogs/20100202/ ) Testing Results A full test matrix can be found at our Test Matrix ( http://spins.fedoraunity.org/Members/Southern_Gentleman/F12-20100202-matrix/ ) About Fedora Unity Re-Spins Fedora Unity has taken up the Re-Spin task to provide the community with the chance to install Fedora with recent updates already included. This is a community project, for and by the community. You can contribute to the community by joining our test process. Go to http://spins.fedoraunity.org/spins to get the bits! Assistance Needed If you are interested in helping with the testing or mirroring efforts, please contact the Fedora Unity team. Contact information is available at http://fedoraunity.org/ or the #fedora-unity channel on the Freenode IRC Network (irc.freenode.net). To report bugs in the Re-Spins please use http://bugs.fedoraunity.org/ -- Ben Williams Windows-Linux Specialist 460 McBryde Hall Blacksburg VA 24061-0123 540 231-2739 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel