Re: gdk-pixbuf removing several icon loaders
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 10:22 AM Benjamin Gilbert wrote: > gdk-pixbuf upstream opted to retain the loaders in the existing > project, so I've submitted a new package that builds them separately > from the same source tarball. These loaders are now available in the gdk-pixbuf2-modules-extra package on Fedora 41. I've posted packaging PRs to add the new dependency to GKrellM, GVim, perl-Gtk3, and XSane. --Benjamin Gilbert -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: gdk-pixbuf removing several icon loaders
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 3:58 PM Benjamin Gilbert wrote: > The affected image formats are ANI, BMP, ICNS, ICO, > PNM, QTIF, TGA, XBM, and XPM. > > [...] > > gdk-pixbuf upstream is discussing splitting these loaders out into a > separate project. Once the plan firms up, I'll package the new > project for F41. gdk-pixbuf upstream opted to retain the loaders in the existing project, so I've submitted a new package that builds them separately from the same source tarball. The review request is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2295748 --Benjamin Gilbert -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: gdk-pixbuf removing several icon loaders
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 1:36 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > gdk-pixbuf 2.42.11 has dropped support for several uncommon image > formats. This is causing several applications to crash in Fedora > rawhide [1][2]. (The change also got backported to F40 and F39, but > I've reverted it there.) Thanks Michael. The affected image formats are ANI, BMP, ICNS, ICO, PNM, QTIF, TGA, XBM, and XPM. Two classes of applications are affected: - Applications that use gdk-pixbuf for displaying UI elements in older formats, e.g. GKrellM and XSane both use XPMs and are both crashing in F41 right now. - Applications that use gdk-pixbuf for displaying user-supplied images, e.g. Eye of GNOME, Nautilus, and OpenSlide. These don't crash, but currently can't load the affected formats in F41. gdk-pixbuf upstream is discussing splitting these loaders out into a separate project. Once the plan firms up, I'll package the new project for F41. --Benjamin Gilbert -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
OpenSlide soname bump in Rawhide
Hi, OpenSlide 4.0.0 includes a soname bump to libopenslide.so.1. The API changes [1] are unlikely to cause issues: they remove functions deprecated since 2014 and change the behavior of some obscure corner cases. These packages are affected: vips vtk Please submit rebuilds in the side tag "f40-build-side-75382". Thanks! --Benjamin Gilbert [1]: https://github.com/openslide/openslide/blob/v4.0.0/CHANGELOG.md#breaking-changes ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
Re: libjpeg-turbo API/ABI bump in F19 (transition from jpeg6 to jpeg8 API/ABI)
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Adam Tkac wrote: > All packages which depends on libjpeg.so will have to be rebuilt. Since I > have > provenpackager privileges, I will cook some script which will rebuild all > pkgs automatically so no action will be required from maintainers. > Currently, new Rawhide builds of programs that use both libjpeg and libtiff/ImageMagick/gdk-pixbuf/etc. will load jpeg8 (direct dependency) *and* jpeg62 (indirect). This is somewhat sub-optimal. When do you expect to start the mass rebuild? Thanks, --Benjamin Gilbert -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Self Introduction
Hi all, My name is Benjamin Gilbert. I'm the upstream maintainer of the OpenSlide library, which reads "virtual slide" files produced by several commercial slide scanners used in digital pathology. Adam Goode has invited me to co-maintain the openslide, vips, and nip2 packages in Fedora. --Benjamin Gilbert -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
