Re: Review swap: wlr-sunclock - Show the sun's shadows on earth (for wayland)
Ello, The review process is documented on the wiki here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process In short, set the fedora-review flag on the bug to ? when you're reviewing a package. When you approve a package, change the flag to +. I'll take this review swap. In return, I'd appreciate it if you reviewed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1869128, which is also a fairly straightforward package using meson. Thanks, -- Carson Black [ jan Pontajosi ] Am So., 16. Aug. 2020 um 21:16 Uhr schrieb Bob Hepple : > > Hi, > > I'm still not 100% sure that I'm able to approve a package - I have > "Fedora Packager GIT Commit Group (packager)", I've been through > sponsorship and I've had packages approved and released. If someone > can point out the doco on this point, I'd be grateful as my searches > haven't come up with anything yet. > > I'm willing to try a review swap for a simple package - I'm still new to this. > > This one has been open for 10 days, It's a simple meson package but > rather fun for the desktop: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1867267 > > > Thanks > > > Bob > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Default animated background for Fedora Workstation
That depends on the format of the animated wallpapers, which I can't seem to figure out from this thread nor the changes page. -- Carson Black [ jan Pontajosi ] Am Mo., 15. Juni 2020 um 21:06 Uhr schrieb Neal Gompa : > > On Mon, Jun 15, 2020 at 4:11 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DefaultAnimatedBackground > > > > == Summary == > > Fedora Workstation 33 uses animate background as default. > > > > == Owner == > > * Name: [[User:luya| Luya Tshimbalanga]] > > * Email: luyaATfedoraproject.org > > * Product: Workstation > > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > > > Starting from Release 33, Fedora Workstation uses default animated > > background as a visual showcase. Spins and lab maintainers running on > > desktop environment unable to support animated wallpaper will be able > > to select a different frame from the default (and variant) background. > > > > == Benefit to Fedora == > > > > Fedora Workstation will showcase its animated background seamlessly as > > default. > > > > Does this improve specific Spins or Editions? > > Design Suite Labs, which is based from Workstation, and > > Fedora Silverblue will take advantage of its change. Other Spins and > > Labs will remains unaffected unless their respective maintainers wish > > to use the default animated background. > > > > > > == Scope == > > * Proposal owners: > > Fedora Workstation may need a slight increase of its ISO file size in > > order to implement the animated backgrounds which are in PNG format. > > Each frame from animation will be selectable from the Background > > Settings. > > > > So I'm confused here, does anyone know why the animated wallpapers > don't work in KDE Plasma or any other desktop? I personally love > animated wallpapers and I'd like to see this on my KDE Plasma desktop > too... > > > > -- > 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Issues with linkage for a package in rpmbuild
Aye, thanks, that did the job. Much appreciated. :) -- Carson Black [ jan Pontaoski ] Am Fr., 17. Apr. 2020 um 16:38 Uhr schrieb Jerry James : > > On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:30 PM Carson Black wrote: > > When updating the 'ikona' package to 1.0, I ran across some linkage > > gore relating to dlopen: https://asciinema.org/a/321155 > > The linker is telling you that -ldl needs to come *after* libikonars.a > on the command line, since the latter needs symbols from the former. > -- > Jerry James > http://www.jamezone.org/ > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Issues with linkage for a package in rpmbuild
When updating the 'ikona' package to 1.0, I ran across some linkage gore relating to dlopen: https://asciinema.org/a/321155 I can only reproduce this within the rpmbuild environment, leading me to believe this is caused by bad compilation flags coming from macros or an issue with rpmbuild's faked root shenanigans (I've seen that compilers can gore heavily when you mess them up). The following work: - Building from source with patch [1] outside rpmbuild in a dirty environment (F32) - Building from source with patch outside rpmbuild in a clean environment (F31 chroot) The following do not work: - Building from source with patch inside rpmbuild's environment (F32) - Building from source with patch inside mock inside rpmbuild's environment (F31 chroot) The faulty package is located at: https://src.fedoraproject.org/fork/appadeia/rpms/ikona/tree/cblack/faulty. Any help or pointers would be much appreciated. [1] The patch consists of backported changes that I made on master. -- Carson Black [ jan Pontaoski ] ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: peek package
Peek only relies on ffmpeg for screen recording on non-GNOME desktops on X11, afaik. On GNOME, it uses the org.gnome.Shell.Screencast interface which offloads all of the heavy work to GNOME shell. -- Carson Black [jan Pontaoski] Am Mi., 1. Jan. 2020 um 09:51 Uhr schrieb Mattia Verga via devel : > > The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it > doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not > distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion): > > $ peek > Error: Child process exited with code 1 > Unable to create default screen recorder. > > The peek specfile contains a `Recommends: ffmpeg >= 3`, which is rather > confusing... I think this package should never have passed the review > process! It should really stay in rpmfusion repository. > > Is this something allowed? Should I file a ticket against the package or > against fedora-infra to suggest its retirement? > > Mattia > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1709029 > [2] https://github.com/phw/peek/issues/485 > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Self Introduction: Carson Black
"ale li pona" is a Toki Pona proverb that can mean a lot of things, but in this context, it means "all is good." -- Carson Black [jan Pontaoski] Am Do., 19. Dez. 2019 um 14:20 Uhr schrieb Silvia Sánchez : > > > Hello Carson! > > Welcome aboard! What does "ale li pona" means? > > Greetings, > Silvia > > > > > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 05:52, Carson Black wrote: >> >> Greetings y'all. >> >> My name is Carson Black & it's nice to meet y'all. >> I'm from Frankfort, Kentucky (and no, I'm not interested in bourbon), and >> I'm currently a student at one of the high schools here. I'd be lying if I >> said I had >> any explicit goals with the Fedora project, as I just do what I feel like >> doing when >> I feel like doing it. ale li pona. :) However, I'm writing this email >> because I recently submitted a >> package for review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784230). >> I've been doing stuff with >> OSS for about over a year now, from doing packaging for openSUSE to abusing >> every last facility GTK+ provides >> as maintainer of Breeze GTK for KDE. I have experience with a variety of >> programming languages, but I'm most >> familiar with C/C++, Python, Go, & Vala. >> >> My GPG fingerprint is A133 906C E9F6 6BFD 2F27 7D67 05DF 0193 8FF8 0320. >> >> Looking forward to participating here with y'all. >> >> -- Carson Black [jan Pontaoski] >> ___ >> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Fedora Code of Conduct: >> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ >> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines >> List Archives: >> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self Introduction: Carson Black
Greetings y'all. My name is Carson Black & it's nice to meet y'all. I'm from Frankfort, Kentucky (and no, I'm not interested in bourbon), and I'm currently a student at one of the high schools here. I'd be lying if I said I had any explicit goals with the Fedora project, as I just do what I feel like doing when I feel like doing it. ale li pona. :) However, I'm writing this email because I recently submitted a package for review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1784230). I've been doing stuff with OSS for about over a year now, from doing packaging for openSUSE to abusing every last facility GTK+ provides as maintainer of Breeze GTK for KDE. I have experience with a variety of programming languages, but I'm most familiar with C/C++, Python, Go, & Vala. My GPG fingerprint is A133 906C E9F6 6BFD 2F27 7D67 05DF 0193 8FF8 0320. Looking forward to participating here with y'all. -- Carson Black [jan Pontaoski] ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
