Re: Help with LDFLAGS for a golang package
Same result as you after re-install a few days later, looks like some cache issue... Sorry for the noise, and thanks for your time! On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 11:41 AM Alejandro Saez Morollon wrote: > Did you figure it out? > I installed the package from your COPR build and I can see the correct > version: > > ``` > Smug - tmux session manager. Version 0.2.2 > ``` > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Help with LDFLAGS for a golang package
Hello, I am trying to build a golang package in COPR, before opening the BZ for inclusion into fedora. go2rpm does almost everything, expect setting a LDFLAG needed for the binary to display the appropriate binary version [1]. When I build locally using mock (with a default config), the binary within the RPM generated is displaying the appropriate version. When I install the package from the COPR repository (built using the same SRPM), the binary is different and prints a version "dev build", like if the LDFLAG was ignored. Looking at the build.log [2], we can see the LDFLAG is set during the gobuild command. I suspected some cache at the COPR repository level, so I tried to clean everything and rebuild it. Same result. At this point I am a bit lost. Anybody to give some hint? My spec file and my SRPM can be found here. [3] Thanks in advance for your help. Jérémy [1] https://github.com/ivn/smug/blob/v0.2.2/Makefile [2] https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/jbertozzi/smug/fedora-34-x86_64/02166586-golang-github-ivn-smug/builder-live.log.gz [3] https://github.com/jbertozzi/copr-build-smug ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F31 to F32
$ sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 Before you continue ensure that your system is fully upgraded by running "dnf --refresh upgrade". Do you want to continue [y/N]: y Adobe Systems Incorporated 7.0 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 Fedora 32 openh264 (From Cisco) - x86_64 4.8 kB/s | 3.0 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 26 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00 Fedora Modular 32 - x86_64 - Updates 28 kB/s | 22 kB 00:00 Fedora 32 - x86_64 - Updates 28 kB/s | 22 kB 00:00 Fedora 32 - x86_64 68 kB/s | 19 kB 00:00 Copr repo for gnome-shell-extensions owned by jbertozzi 1.4 kB/s | 3.3 kB 00:02 RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree - Updates 29 kB/s | 9.3 kB 00:00 RPM Fusion for Fedora 32 - Nonfree 34 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00 teams 12 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00 Error: Problem 1: package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld-1.3-1.fc31.x86_64 requires libpulsecore-13.0.so()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed - pulseaudio-13.0-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package pulseaudio-module-bluetooth-freeworld-1.3-1.fc31.x86_64 Problem 2: package rpmfusion-free-release-31-1.noarch requires system-release(31), but none of the providers can be installed - fedora-release-31-2.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package rpmfusion-free-release-31-1.noarch (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages) On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:37 PM wrote: > I'm on Fedora 32 Beta now: > > 1. Took a few hours > 2. Some Error message packed from Modular Repo > 3. Other Packed Problem > > About it these steps before with the following command: > > sudo dnf system-upgrade download --releasever=32 --skip-broken --best > --allowerasing > > All working now > > See my first post: > > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UGFOXANDCRCL3DHPOK7P6CEAIUSZXYGI/ > > Regards and as usual _Nice Works_ again thx > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Self Introduction: Jérémy Bertozzi
Hello, My name is Jérémy Bertozzi. I have been working as a sysadmin for the last 10+ years, mainly on RHEL based systems. I have been packaging software into RPM for my job for quite some time now. I came accross a software called "upt"[1], and I realized it was not available on Fedora, so I got in touch with upstream and ask about the idea to have the project packaged in Fedora. And here I am, with a few review requests! :-) I have created a COPR repository [2] to test my work. This is my first contribution to Fedora, so I am seeking for a sponsor. I would be glad to perform some reviews, to the best of my (limited) knowledge. Regards, Jérémy [1] https://framagit.org/upt [2] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jbertozzi/upt/ Link to Review requests: * python-spdx (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756901, dependency) * python-spdx-lookup (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756905, dependency) * python-upt-fedora (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756906, backend for upt) * python-upt-pypi (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756907, frontend for upt) * python-upt-rubygems (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756908, frontend for upt) * upt (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756899) ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Re: Character limit for spec file summary?
Hi, >From the guideline : "Also, please make sure that there are no lines in the description longer than 80 characters." https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_summary_and_description On Sat, 6 Jul 2019, 22:25 Richard Shaw, wrote: > Is there an actual limit or guideline on the character length of the > summary tag? > > I can't seem to find anything one way or the other. > > Thanks, > Richard > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
