Re: Memory requirements

2011-08-30 Thread Jeremiah Summers
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Felix Miata mrma...@earthlink.net wrote:
 On 2011/08/29 15:04 (GMT-0700) Jeremiah Summers composed:

 I just repatched Anaconda to use 512M

 Literally? If so, does that work on systems with 512M installed but with 8M
 allocated to an onboard video chip?
 --
 The wise are known for their understanding, and pleasant
 words are persuasive. Proverbs 16:21 (New Living Translation)

  Team OS/2 ** Reg. Linux User #211409 ** a11y rocks!

 Felix Miata  ***  http://fm.no-ip.com/
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Yes Literally I did, but as Adam just pointed out running Live just
dumps the squashfs image to the drive and slaps grud on it. I'm not
sure about the install, however I have been tweaking initrd's for
doing a netinstall, I may just find out soon. I wonder though is there
a way to allow Anaconda to be semi smart and realize here I'm running
livecd let's bump down that mem require. In that case it would allow
those a install method with low mem.

Kind Regards,

Jeremiah
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Memory requirements (was: Re: Fedora 16 Alpha i386 does not install in VMWare)

2011-08-30 Thread Jeremiah Summers
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:15 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
 On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 22:02 +0200, drago01 wrote:
 On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 PM, Brian C. Lane b...@redhat.com wrote:
  On Sat, Aug 27, 2011 at 04:15:37PM -0700, a...@clueserver.org wrote:
 
  In both cases I had 2 gigs of ram. Should not be a memory issue.
 
  That is more than enough. Please file a bug(s) and include the logs
  from /tmp/*log
 
  Memory usage during install also depends on what the packages being
  installed do in their pre/post scripts. selinux is a big example of
  this, causing a large spike as it is installed.

 SELinux Enhancements. SELinux policy package now includes a pre-built
 policy that will only rebuild policy if any customizations have been
 made. A sample test run shows 4 times speedup on installing the
 package from 48 Seconds to 12 Seconds and max memory usage from 38M to
 6M. In addition to that, [1]


 1: http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/45414.html

 Yes. The reason why that work has been done is because everyone kicked
 up a stink about anaconda using too much memory, so the anaconda team
 looked closer into what was taking up so much memory, found out selinux
 policy installation caused quite a significant chunk of it, and told Dan
 about it. None of this is news to anyone actually involved in the
 relevant development teams =)

 this topic has really been done to death on this list and many others.
 anaconda team is aware of the memory use issue and is working on fixing
 it. this selinux change is one of the fixes.
 --
 Adam Williamson
 Fedora QA Community Monkey
 IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
 http://www.happyassassin.net

 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


I would say thank you but the tone I'm getting in the email seems
rather reluctant to try and be as memory efficient as possible, a
little bit like we just did it to stop your whining. I'm sure that's
not the tone you mean and even if so I'm sure you're not talking for
the anaconda team. So regardless.. Thank You all who have beaten this
thing to death and those who won't let it die until it's as efficient
as possible with the hardware given.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


Re: Memory requirements

2011-08-29 Thread Jeremiah Summers
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
 Brian C. Lane wrote:
 selinux is a big example of
 this, causing a large spike as it is installed.

 That should[1] no longer be an issue.

 [1] http://danwalsh.livejournal.com/45414.html
 --
 devel mailing list
 devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


I just repatched Anaconda to use 512M, it's slow for LiveMedia but it
works fine. Not sure why it was bumped to 768M I haven;t had any
issues yet, in virtual or physical environments.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel